Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Observation of quintuplet spectrum including twice the ground-state Rabi frequency in F = 3/2 metastable state of 3He atoms

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A novel quintuplet spectrum is observed in  3He atoms’ metastable state 23S1, when linear polarized light is adopted to probe the alignment component of its F=3/2 hyperfine structure. Static and oscillating magnetic fields produce magnetic resonance and Rabi nutation in ground state 11S0, respectively. After Fourier transform, centre frequency of the metastable-state quintuplet spectrum coincidences with the ground state Larmor frequency, and frequency separations between the five peaks equal to that of ground state Rabi nutation. Similar quintuplet spectrum is observed in  4He metastable state mixed with  3He hybrid vapor.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Thanks to its simple atomic structure, Helium atoms play an important role in metrology, e.g. measurement of fine-structure constant [1–3], neutron electric dipole moments [4, 5], and is useful for high sensitivity magnetometer [6–10]. Two isotopes exist,  3He and  4He, both with two electrons, and can be distinguished by nuclear spin I.  3He has richer energy level structure with I=1/2 (see, Fig. 1), while  4He having no nuclear spin at all. For both  3He and  4He, since ground state 11S0 is normally spectroscopically inaccessible, the lowest metastable state 23S1, which is usually produced by discharge in atomic vapor, is more favorable.

Study on interaction between  3He ground state 11S0 and metastable state 23S1 can be traced back to the 1960s [11, 12]. The original motivation is to indirectly produce populationdifference between Zeeman sublevels of the ground state 11S0, or “polarization” in the language of multipole moment formalism (see, Chap. 5 of [13]) by the means of optical pumping induced repopulation among metastable state 23S1 sublevels. This interaction is named “metastability exchange collisions” (MECs), where during a rapid collision process between  3He atoms, there is a good chance that the nuclei of those in ground state combines with the electron of those in metastable state to get “metastability”. Here “metastability” stands for electron energy level 1s2s of metastable state 23S1, in contrary to 1s2 of 11S0. Angular momentum is conserved in MECs, so the aforementioned process can be viewed as transfer of polarization between 11S0 and 23S1. A natural extension would be transfer of coherence, i.e., off-diagonal elements of density matrix in angular momentum representation, which enables full capacity of manipulation on ground state 11S0 by optical pumping of the metastable state 23S1 [14, 15].

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Energy-level diagram for 3He atoms (not in scale). The nuclear spin for 3He is 1/2. There is no electronic spin or orbit angular momentum for the ground state 11 S0. For the metastable state 23 S1, the electronic spin is 1 and the orbit angular momentum is 0. For the excited state 23 P0 the electronic spin is 1 and angular momentum is 0. The ground-state atoms can be excited to the metastable state by RF discharge, and atomic polarization canbe exchanged between the ground state and the metastable state by metastability-exchange collisions (MECs). The gyromagnetic ratios for the ground and the metastable states are different, i.e., γg= -32 Hz/μT, γμ= -38 kHz/μT, and γμ= -19 kHz/μT for the ground state and the two metastable hyperfine levels F = 1/2 and F = 3/2, respectively [11]. Atoms in the metastable state can be optically pumped or detected by C8 or C9 line with a 1083.353 nm or 1083.326 nm wavelength laser beam [14].

Download Full Size | PDF

In this work, a quintuplet spectrum is observed in the metastable-state  3He atoms, which is coupled with the magnetically-driven ground-state  3He atoms via the metastable state by MECs. The quintuplet spectrum includes Larmor frequency, sidebands of Rabi frequency and twice the Rabi frequency of the ground state, and only can be detected by linearly polarized light in F=3/2 hyperfine level in pure  3He atomic cell. Furthermore, the quintuplet spectrum can also be observed in metastable  4He atoms with the angular momentum quantum number to be J = 1 in a hybrid atomic vapor cell mixed with  3He atoms. The novel quintuplet spectrum detected in the metastable-state atoms has not been reported, which is relevant to the rank-two multipole moment (alignment component) coupled with transferred Rabi nutation via MECs.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Experimental setup. PBS, polarization beam splitter; QWP, quarter wave plate; HWP, half wave plate; BE, beam expander; BT, beam trap and PD, photo detector.

Download Full Size | PDF

2. Experimental results

The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2. The metastable  3He atoms are optically pumped with a circular polarized laser beam propagating in the z direction with the 1/e2 waist diameter to be ∼ 20 mm and the power to be ∼ 15 W. The probe beam propagating in the x direction is applied to detect the atomic polarization in the metastable state with the 1/e2 waist diameter to be ∼ 1 mm and the power to be ∼ 0.3 W. Both the pump and probe beams are from the laser source NKT Photonics Y10 and the pump beam is power-enhanced with a laser amplifier (LEA Photonics MLXX-EYFA-CW-SLM-P-TKS). The home-made pure  3He cylindrical atomic cell (0.6 Torr, ϕ = 50 mm, L=70 mm) is located in the seven-layer magnetic shield and excited with a radio-frequency power source module (50 MHz, 0.8 W) to continuously discharge and generate metastable-state atoms. The static magnetic field B0 oriented in the z axis is generated by the solenoid and a set of Helmholtz coils is applied to generate an oscillating magnetic field BMcos (2πfMt) aligned with the y axis. The digital processing system used to control the Helmholtz coils and acquire the signals consists of the sound and vibration modules (PXI-4461 and PXI-4462, resolution@24-Bit, sampling rate@204.8 kS/s) of National Instruments. The oscillating magnetic field can be switched on or off by the digital processing system and its frequency is fixed at the ground-state Larmor frequency.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Frequency spectrums for C8- or C9-line probe. Black dots are the experimental data, and red lines are the connecting lines of adjacent data points. (a) and (b) are probed with C8 line, and (c) and (d) are probed with C9 line. The probe beams for (a) and (c) are circularly polarized, and for (b) and (d) are linearly polarized.

Download Full Size | PDF

Both the pump and probe beams continuously interact with atoms, and the oscillating magnetic field interacts with atoms impulsively. The Larmor frequency of ground state is fg=γgB0, where γg is the gyromagnetic ratio. The frequency of the oscillating magnetic field is set as Larmor frequency of the ground state, i.e., fM=fg, and it induces Rabi nutation whose frequency is fR=1/2γgBM in ground state [16]. When the probe beam is circularly polarized, and tuned to the C 8 or C 9 line, a triplet spectrum is detected, as is shown in Fig. 3(a) and 3(c). The spectrum is similar to Ref. [17], where the center peak is located at Larmor frequency fg and the two sidebands are with an interval of Rabi frequency fR to the central peak. It demonstrates that the Rabi nutation (or dressed effect) is transferred from the ground state to the metastable state via MECs, as both the Larmor and the Rabi frequencies bear the ground-state features. Additional two peaks appear in the spectrum when the probe beam is linearly polarized and tuned to the C 9 line, while almost no signal is detected when the linearly polarized light is tuned to the C 8 line, as is shown in Fig. 3(d) and 3(b). The interval between the central peak and the two additional peaks is twice the Rabi frequency. We also find that the quintuplet spectrum varies with the polarization direction of the probe beam, as is shown in Fig. 4. When the polarization of the linearly polarized probe beam is rotated in the yz plane, denoting the angle between the polarization direction and the y axis by θ, one can find that the heights of the peaks in the quintuplet spectrum are almost zero at θ = 0 and 90°, and reach the maximum at θ=45 and 135°. We measure the height of the central peak at different angles, and find that it can be well described by the function sin 2θ, as is shown in Fig. 4(d). The intervals of the peaks are investigated at different strength of the oscillating magnetic field, as is shown in Fig. 5(a). We fix the angle θ at 45° and change the strength of oscillating magnetic field BM. The interval between the two adjacent peaks is almost linearly dependent on BM, consistent with the formula to calculate Rabi frequency at resonance, i.e., fR=1/2γgBM. The fact that spectral line is not strictly straightis due to the instability of the oscillating field’s frequency while changing its amplitude. We also measure the spectrum when the oscillating field is detuned from Larmor frequency, as is shown in Fig. 5(b). The effective Rabi frequency at detuning can be calculated by fR,eff=(1/2γgBM)2+(fMγgB0)2.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Quintuplet spectrums for linearly polarized probe laser beams with different polarization directions. Black dots in (c) and (d) are the experimental data, red lines in (c) are the connecting lines of adjacent data points, and blue line in (d)is a mathematical curve. (a) the polarization direction of the linearly polarized laser beam; it rotates in the z - y plane and θ is the titled angle with respect to y axis. (b) and (c) show the heights of the quintuplet spectrum at different angles. (d) The heights of the central peaks at differen angles; the black dots is the measured and normalized value and the blue line is a mathematical curve with function sin (2θ). The static magnetic field is ∼41 μT.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Quintuplet spectrums at different oscillating magnetic field. (a) the oscillating magnetic field’s frequency is tuned to Larmor frequency while changing its amplitude; (b) the oscillating magnetic field’s amplitude is fixed at 3 μT while changing its detuning. Larmor frequency is equal to ∼1300 Hz.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Discussion

According to the observed phenomena, we give an interpretation that the quintuplet spectrum is induced by three process including Rabi nutation’s generation in ground state 11S0, transfer to metastable state 23S1 by MECs,and detection of alignment component among rank-two multipole moment.

3.1. Rabi nutation of ground state 11S0

The ground state of  3He atom splits into two sublevels mI=1/2 and mI=1/2, with the frequency difference of the Larmor frequency fg=γgB0. The frequency of oscillating magnetic field is set as fM=fg to maintain magnetic resonance. The magnetic moment of ground state is μI=γgI, where I is the nuclei spin, since the spin electrons s = 0. This two-level system connected by dipole experiencing external electromagnetic field would have a typical Rabi oscillation, called Rabi nutation in particular, which would result in two symmetric sidebands to the main peak with Lamour frequency fg, each separated by Rabi frequency fR=1/2γgBM. Please note that γg is the gyromagnetic ratio of the ground state.

3.2. Metastability exchange collisions transfer coherence

The MECs of pure  3He atoms are modeled that the metastable-state atoms immediately after the collision are constructed by the nuclei of ground-state atoms ρg and electrons of metastable-state atoms before MECs, and the model can be expressed as the following equation [14, 15]

ρm=FPF(ρgTrnρm ')PF,
where ρg is the density matrix of the ground state, ρm (ρm ') is the density matrix of metastable states after (before) MECs, Trn is trace operator over the nuclear variables, PF is the projector on each hyperfine level of the metastable states. Equation (1) reveals that the metastable states are influenced by ground state, and both population and coherence of ground state, i.e., diagonal and off-diagonal elements of ρg, can be transferred to each hyperfine levels via MECs [15].

Rabi nutation of ground state is a kind of coherence among Zeeman sublevels, which can be transferred to metastable states via MECs according to Eq. (1). The experimental results shown in Fig. 3(a) and 3(c) are detected in both F=3/2 and F=1/2 metastable states. The central peak and sidebands are corresponding with the Larmor and Rabi frequencies of ground state, respectively. Figures. 3(a) and 3(c) demonstrate that the Rabi nutation of ground state 11S0 has transferred to metastable state clearly. To be more clear, the evolution equations of  3He metastable-state’s orientation component based on Eq. (1), when no coherence between hyperfine structure levels exists, are [21]

ddt3/2F=49τ3/2F+109τ1/2F+109τIf,
ddt1/2F=19τ3/2F79τ1/2F19τIf,
where  3/2F and  1/2F are the orientation components of F=3/2 and F=1/2 hyperfine structure sublevels, respectively, If is the orientation of ground state, and τ is the MECs relaxation time for metastable states. Equations (2) and (3) reveal that the orientation of each metastable states can be influenced by the orientation of ground state. That is how the Larmor and Rabi frequencies of ground state appears in the evolution of metastable-state orientation, in particular, which results in a triplet spectrum shown in Fig. 3(a) and 3(c).

3.3. Alignment of F=3/2 metastable-state and quintuplet with twice Rabi frequency

The creation of twice the Rabi frequency can be further interpreted with rank-two multipole moment (alignment) of F=3/2 metastable-state, for which the F=1/2 hyperfine structure does not have. The metastable-state density matrix ρm can be expressed in terms of multipole moments mk,q according to [18]

ρm=kqmk,qTq(k),
where multipole moments mk,q are defined as
mk,q=Tq(k)=Tr(ρmTq(k)),
where Tq(k) are irreducible tensor operators of rank k,
Tq(k)=MM(1)FMF,M,F,M|k,q|F,MF,M|,
with |F,M being the Zeeman sublevels in non-coupling picture. The value of rank k is limited by the total angular momentum F, i.e., 0k2F. The value of q is limited by the rank k, i.e., kqk. M is themagnetic quantum number of the Zeeman sublevels. Hence, the hyperfine level F=1/2 has no rank-two tensor. In theory, when both the pump and the probe beams in quantization axis z, only the m2,0 component can be detected with linearly polarized light [19]. Generally, when the pump (probe) beam is in z (x) axis, observed absorption of probe light, rather than m2,0, varies as [20]
SC0m2,0(1+3cos 2α)+C1(m2,1+m2,1)sin 2α+C2(m2,2+m2,2)sin2α.
where α denotes the angle between the quantization axis z and the polarization direction of linearly polarized probe light, and C0, C1, C2 are coefficients.

The alignment component of  3He metastable state Qij m can consider m2,q for F=3/2 metastable state, where i,j=x,y,z. The evolution equations of alignment component of F=3/2 sublevel  3/2Qij m, when no coherence between hyperfine structure levels exist, are [21]

ddt3/2Qij m=23τ3/2Qij m+19τ(3Ii fSj m+Ij fSi m2IfSm),
If=13[ 3/2F1/2F],
Sm=23[ 3/2F+21/2F],
where Sm is the electrons’ orientation of metastable states. Substituting Eqs. (9) and (10) into Eq. (8), we can obtain
ddt3/2Qij m=23τ3/2Qij m+19τ[ 3/2Fi 3/2Fj+3/2Fi 1/2Fj+3/2Fj 1/2Fi41/2Fi 1/2Fj329( 3/2F2+3/2F1/2F21/2F2)].

Equations (2) and (3) reveal that the orientation terms of both the F=3/2 and F=1/2 metastable states are influenced by the ground state, which demonstrates the Larmor and Rabi frequencies of the ground state transfer to metastablestates. Equation (11) further reveals that the alignment of F=3/2 hyperfine structure levels is influenced by orientation terms of F=3/2 and F=1/2 levels. The products of orientation terms includes twice the Larmor frequency and twice the Rabi frequency of ground state. The longitudinal orientation like  1/2Fz includes the Rabi frequency, while the transverse orientation like  1/2Fx includes the Larmor frequency and Rabi frequency. The terms multiplied by longitudinal and transverse orientation (like  1/2Fx 1/2Fz) give the quintuplet spectrum includes fg, fg±fR, and fg±2fR.

The alignment of metastable state can be detected with linearly polarized light, and hyperfine level F=3/2 (F=1/2) observed quintuplet spectrum (no signal) shown in Fig. 3(d) (3(b)), which demonstrates that alignment of metastable state coupled Rabi nutation of ground state via MECs can create quintuplet spectrum. In order to confirm the interpretation, the similar experiment is achieved in hybrid atomic cell of  4He and  3He atoms [22]. The central frequency of pump and probe laser is tuned to D 0 line of  4He atoms. The density matrix of  4He metastable-state atoms also has rank-two multipole moment (alignment) due to J = 1. The similar quintuplet spectrum with hyperfine level F=3/2 of pure  3He atomic cell is shown in Fig. 6(b). The experimental results in hybrid cell give more evidence for alignment inducing quintuplet spectrum.

In addition, the angle-dependence of the quintuplet spectrum detected in F=3/2 level with linearly polarized light in x axis at the Larmor frequency of ground state shown in Fig. 4 agrees with that of m2,±1 component in Eq. (7),

SQSsin 2α(m2,1+m2,1).

Notice that operators T±1(2)(3/2F) for F=3/2 metastable state corresponding to m2,±1 can be expressed as [18]

T±1(2)(3/2F)[( 3/2Fx3/2Fz+3/2Fz3/2Fx)±i( 3/2Fy3/2Fz+3/2Fz3/2Fy)],
where  3/2Fi (i=x,y,z) is the angular momentum operator of F=3/2 metastable state. Equation (13) only includes the products of longitudinal and transverse angular momentum operators. As θ denotes the angle between the polarization direction of the linearly polarized probe beam and the y axis, we found that α=π/2θ. Therefore, the quintuplet spectrum depends on the θ in the sin (2θ) manner, which agrees with the experimental results shown in Fig. 4(d).

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 Frequency spectrums for 4He atoms in a hybrid atomic vapor cell mixed with 3He atoms. All the experimental conditions are similar to that of the pure 3He atomic vapor, except for that, the metastable 4He atoms are optically pumped and probed rather than the 3He. The 3He atoms are polarized via MECs with the 4He atoms. Black dots are the experimental data, and red lines are the connecting lines of adjacent data points. (a) triplet spectrum probed with circularly polarized laser beam; (b) quintuplet spectrum probed with linearly polarized laser beam. Both the pump and probe laser beams are tuned to D0 line and the pump beam is circular polarized.

Download Full Size | PDF

In summary, the experimental results provide three major evidences that the observed quintuplet spectrum is induced by rank-two multipole moment (alignment component) of metastable state coupled with transferred Rabi nutation from ground state via MECs:

  1. The quintuplet spectrum is detected in metastable state by optical methods. The central frequency of quintuplet spectrum is the Larmor frequency of ground state, and the interval of each peak is the Rabi frequency of ground state, too. The evidence supports the MECs transferring the Rabi nutation of ground state to metastable states.
  2. The experimental results detected F=1/2, F=3/2, J = 1 metastable states with different polarization light in pure  3He and hybrid cell of  4He and  3He atoms show the quintuplet spectrum can be observed only when there is the rank-two multipole moment.
  3. The angle-dependence of quintuplet spectrum agrees with that of rank-two multipole moment in theory.

4. Conclusion

In this work, we present a quintuplet spectrum that is optically observed in the F=3/2 metastable  3He hyperfine level. The phenomenon is induced by the rank-two multipole moment (alignment component) of metastable state coupled with transferred Rabi nutation from ground state via MECs, and the experimental results support our the preliminary interpretation including comparison of detection via different polarized light in different metastable states and angle-dependence of quintuplet spectrum. We areworking on more details about the quintuplet spectrum like the spatial distribution of metastable-state atoms changed by cell shape and discharge. A comprehensive and in-depth analysis will be presented in our subsequent work.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61571018, 61531003, 91436210); National key research and development program.

Acknowledgments

We thank for H.W. and H.d.W. with experimental and technical assistance. We also thank for Prof. Pierre-Jean Nacher (Kastler-Brossel Laboratory) for discussions.

References

1. K. Pachucki and V. A. Yerokhin, “Reexamination of the helium fine structure,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 062516 (2009). [CrossRef]  

2. G.-P. Feng, X. Zheng, Y. R. Sun, and S.-M. Hu, “Laser-spectroscopy measurement of the fine-structure splitting 23P123P2 of  4He,” Phys. Rev. A ,91, 030502 (2015). [CrossRef]  

3. M. Smiciklas and D. Shiner, “Determination of the Fine Structure Constant Using Helium Fine Structure,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 123001 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. T. R. Gentile, P.-J. Nacher, B. Saam, and T. G. Walker, “Optically polarized  3He,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 045004 (2017). [CrossRef]  

5. T. E. Chupp, P. Fierlinger, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and J. T. Singh, “Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015001 (2019). [CrossRef]  

6. C. Gemmel, W. Heil, S. Karpuk, K. Lenz, C. Ludwig, Y. Sobolev, K. Tullney, M. Burghoff, W. Kilian, S. Knappe-Grüneberg, W. Müller, A. Schnabel, F. Seifert, L. Trahms, and S. Baessler, “Ultra-sensitive magnetometry based onfree precession of nuclear spins,” Eur. Phys. J. D 57, 303–320 (2010). [CrossRef]  

7. A. Nikiel, P. Blümler, W. Heil, M. Hehn, S. Karpuk, A. Maul, E. Otten, L. Schreiber, and M. Terekhov, Ültrasensitive  3He magnetometer for measurements of high magnetic fields,” Eur. Phys. J. D 68, 330 (2014) [CrossRef]  

8. H.-C. Koch, G. Bison, Z.D. Grujić, W. Heil, M. Kasprzak, P. Knowles, A. Kraft, A. Pazgalev, A. Schnabel, J. Voigt, and A. Weis, “Investigation of the intrinsic sensitivity of a  3He/Cs magnetometer,” Eur. Phys. J. D 69, 262 (2015). [CrossRef]  

9. S. Morales, M. C. Corsi, W. Fourcault, F. Bertrand, G. Cauffet, C. Gobbo, F. Alcouffe, F. Lenouvel, M. Le Prado, F. Berger, G. Vanzetto, and E. Labyt, “Magnetocardiography measurements with  4He vector optically pumped magnetometers at room temperature,” Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 7267–7279 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. F. Beato, E. Belorizky, E. Labyt, M. Le Prado, and A. Palacios-Laloy, “Theory of a  4He parametric-resonance magnetometer based on atomic alignment,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 053431 (2018). [CrossRef]  

11. F. D. Colegrove, L. D. Schearer, and G. K. Walters, “Polarization of  3He Gas by Optical Pumping,” Phys. Rev. 132, 2561–2572 (1963). [CrossRef]  

12. R. C. Greenhow, “Optical pumping in He3,” Phys. Rev. 136, A660–A662 (1964). [CrossRef]  

13. M. Auzinsh, D. Budker, and S. M. Rochester, Optically Polarized Atoms (Oxford University, 2010).

14. P.-J. Nacher and M. Leduc, “Optical pumping in  3He with a laser,” J. Phys. 46, 2057–2073 (1985). [CrossRef]  

15. R. B. Partridge and G. W. Series, “The transfer of coherence by collisions of  3He atoms,” Proc. Phys. Soc. 88, 983–993 (1966). [CrossRef]  

16. H. C. Koch, G. Bison, Z. D. Grujic, W. Heil, M. Kasprzak, P. Knowles, A. Kraft, A. Pazgalev, A. Schnabel, J. Voigt, and A. Weis, “Study of  3He Rabi nutations by optically-pumped cesium magnetometers,” Eur. Phys. J. D 71, 262 (2017). [CrossRef]  

17. C. Basler, J. Grzesiak, and H. Helm, “Radio-frequency-assisted electromagnetically induced transparency,” Phys. Rev. A 92, 013809 (2015). [CrossRef]  

18. K. Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications (Plemum, 1996). [CrossRef]  

19. A. Weis and G. Bison, “Theory of double resonance magnetometers based on atomic alignment,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 033401 (2006). [CrossRef]  

20. This equation is derived by simply implementing a ratotion on the zeroth component of the second order tensor. It can be easily done with the WignerD function in the ADM package of Mathematica, which can be found in http://rochesterscientific.com/ADM/AtomicDensityMatrix.

21. J. Dupont-Roc, “Etude de quelques effets lié au pompage optique en champ faible,” Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI (1972).

22. E. Stoltz, M. Meyerhoff, N. Bigelow, M. Leduc, P.-J. Nacher, and G. Tastevin, “High nuclear polarization in  3He and  3He- 4He gas mixtures by optical pumping with a laser diode,” Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 63, 629–633 (1996).

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Energy-level diagram for 3He atoms (not in scale). The nuclear spin for 3He is 1/2. There is no electronic spin or orbit angular momentum for the ground state 11 S0. For the metastable state 23 S1, the electronic spin is 1 and the orbit angular momentum is 0. For the excited state 23 P0 the electronic spin is 1 and angular momentum is 0. The ground-state atoms can be excited to the metastable state by RF discharge, and atomic polarization canbe exchanged between the ground state and the metastable state by metastability-exchange collisions (MECs). The gyromagnetic ratios for the ground and the metastable states are different, i.e., γg= -32 Hz/μT, γμ= -38 kHz/μT, and γ μ = -19 kHz/μT for the ground state and the two metastable hyperfine levels F = 1/2 and F = 3/2, respectively [11]. Atoms in the metastable state can be optically pumped or detected by C8 or C9 line with a 1083.353 nm or 1083.326 nm wavelength laser beam [14].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Experimental setup. PBS, polarization beam splitter; QWP, quarter wave plate; HWP, half wave plate; BE, beam expander; BT, beam trap and PD, photo detector.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Frequency spectrums for C8- or C9-line probe. Black dots are the experimental data, and red lines are the connecting lines of adjacent data points. (a) and (b) are probed with C8 line, and (c) and (d) are probed with C9 line. The probe beams for (a) and (c) are circularly polarized, and for (b) and (d) are linearly polarized.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Quintuplet spectrums for linearly polarized probe laser beams with different polarization directions. Black dots in (c) and (d) are the experimental data, red lines in (c) are the connecting lines of adjacent data points, and blue line in (d)is a mathematical curve. (a) the polarization direction of the linearly polarized laser beam; it rotates in the z - y plane and θ is the titled angle with respect to y axis. (b) and (c) show the heights of the quintuplet spectrum at different angles. (d) The heights of the central peaks at differen angles; the black dots is the measured and normalized value and the blue line is a mathematical curve with function sin (2θ). The static magnetic field is ∼41 μT.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Quintuplet spectrums at different oscillating magnetic field. (a) the oscillating magnetic field’s frequency is tuned to Larmor frequency while changing its amplitude; (b) the oscillating magnetic field’s amplitude is fixed at 3 μT while changing its detuning. Larmor frequency is equal to ∼1300 Hz.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Frequency spectrums for 4He atoms in a hybrid atomic vapor cell mixed with 3He atoms. All the experimental conditions are similar to that of the pure 3He atomic vapor, except for that, the metastable 4He atoms are optically pumped and probed rather than the 3He. The 3He atoms are polarized via MECs with the 4He atoms. Black dots are the experimental data, and red lines are the connecting lines of adjacent data points. (a) triplet spectrum probed with circularly polarized laser beam; (b) quintuplet spectrum probed with linearly polarized laser beam. Both the pump and probe laser beams are tuned to D0 line and the pump beam is circular polarized.

Equations (13)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

ρ m = F P F ( ρ g Tr n ρ m   ' ) P F ,
d d t 3 / 2 F = 4 9 τ 3 / 2 F + 10 9 τ 1 / 2 F + 10 9 τ I f ,
d d t 1 / 2 F = 1 9 τ 3 / 2 F 7 9 τ 1 / 2 F 1 9 τ I f ,
ρ m = k q m k , q T q ( k ) ,
m k , q = T q ( k ) = Tr ( ρ m T q ( k ) ) ,
T q ( k ) = M M ( 1 ) F M F , M , F , M | k , q | F , M F , M | ,
S C 0 m 2 , 0 ( 1 + 3 cos  2 α ) + C 1 ( m 2 , 1 + m 2 , 1 ) sin  2 α + C 2 ( m 2 , 2 + m 2 , 2 ) sin 2 α .
d d t 3 / 2 Q i j   m = 2 3 τ 3 / 2 Q i j   m + 1 9 τ ( 3 I i   f S j   m + I j   f S i   m 2 I f S m ) ,
I f = 1 3 [   3 / 2 F 1 / 2 F ] ,
S m = 2 3 [   3 / 2 F + 2 1 / 2 F ] ,
d d t 3 / 2 Q i j   m = 2 3 τ 3 / 2 Q i j   m + 1 9 τ [   3 / 2 F i   3 / 2 F j + 3 / 2 F i   1 / 2 F j + 3 / 2 F j   1 / 2 F i 4 1 / 2 F i   1 / 2 F j 3 2 9 (   3 / 2 F 2 + 3 / 2 F 1 / 2 F 2 1 / 2 F 2 ) ] .
S QS sin  2 α ( m 2 , 1 + m 2 , 1 ) .
T ± 1 ( 2 ) ( 3 / 2 F ) [ (   3 / 2 F x 3 / 2 F z + 3 / 2 F z 3 / 2 F x ) ± i (   3 / 2 F y 3 / 2 F z + 3 / 2 F z 3 / 2 F y ) ] ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.