Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Instability transverse mode phase transition of fiber oscillator for extreme power lasers

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

High-power fiber lasers have been widely explored in engineering and science, and improving the beam quality restricted by transverse mode instability (TMI) is waiting to be solved for extra high-power applications. Here, we theoretically propose a phase transition model for understanding TMI in a fiber oscillator. A general dynamics model describing TMI is established by modifying the heat equation, and then a special dynamics model of a two-mode fiber (TMF) oscillator is obtained by applying this general dynamics model to TMF oscillator case. Theoretical analysis shows that there is a reversible phase transition point in this TMF oscillator model, which can well explain the sudden and reversible change of TMI. Based on linear stability analysis near the phase transition point, an analytical threshold formula of TMI is given to calculate the TMI threshold in the TMF oscillator. The calculated results are consistent with the reported experimental results. Furthermore, the relationship between the TMI threshold and several parameters was also discussed in detail such as laser wavelength, pump wavelength, core radius, cladding radius, etc. This theoretical model will be useful to understand and suppress the TMI in fiber oscillators.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

High power fiber lasers have earned a wide variety of application in industry, science and defense due to high conversion efficiency, excellent beam quality, and robustness [1, 2]. The Large-Mode-Area (LMA) double-cladding gain fibers lead to an exponential evolution of the output power of fiber lasers over the past two decades [3]. However, the evolution is suffering from a sudden halt [4] due to transverse mode instability (TMI). The TMI occurs suddenly once the output power of fiber laser exceeds a certain value (several hundred to several thousand watts), which exhibits obvious threshold-like behaviors [5]. When the TMI emerges, the beam quality of fiberlaser is getting worse suddenly, which has become a major limitation for further enhancing the output power of fiber lasers [1, 4]. Therefore, it is very important to understand the underlying physics of TMI and find out efficient strategies to suppress it.

Since TMI was firstly observed in 2011 [5], a series of important characteristics of TMI have been reported, such as obvious threshold-like behavior [5], temporal fluctuations in kHz frequency towards chaos with increased power [6–8], the TMI threshold and fluctuation frequency sensitive to fiber parameters such as core-cladding ratio [6], and so on. An initial physical interpretation for TMI was that a self-induced long period refractive index grating (RIG) could cause energy transfer between two transverse modes due to quantum-defect heating [9]. Shortly after, Smith et al. pointed out that it must be a phase shift between RIG and the inter-mode interference pattern for efficient energy coupling within transverse modes [10]. The RIG was considered as moving grating rather than stationary grating and a frequency detuning between two transverse modes is necessary for the moving gratings [11]. A Semi-static numerical model in fiber amplifiers was proposed and explains the effects of different cooling configurations on the threshold based on full numerical simulation [12]. Afterwards, a static TMI model in double-pass fiber amplifiers was also established [13]. Very recently, M. N. Zervas proposed the first TMI threshold formula by linear stability analysis in spatial domain in fiber amplifiers and pointed out that the relative phase between the fundamental mode and the transverse perturbation significantly affects the local TMI gain [14, 15].

Despite the proposed theories can explain the main characteristics of TMI, however, the suddenness and reversibility of TMI are still not clearly explained. Furthermore, the analysis results based on these theories only provides qualitative agreement with experimental results. Therefore, there remains the need for further work to provide clarity on the validity of the theoretical model. Moreover, the characteristics of TMI, such as spontaneity and criticality, indicate that TMI is a non-equilibrium phase transition phenomenon and has a striking resemblance to those found in other research fields such as hydrodynamics [16], plasma physics [17], nonlinear chemical reactions [18]. Therefore, we can try to explain this problem from the perspective of non-equilibrium phase transition.

In this paper, we established a general dynamics model (containing time) of TMI by modifying the heat equation and dimensionless transformation. A special phase transition model of a TMF oscillator was established by applying this general dynamic model to TMF oscillator case based on eigenmodes expansion analysis (spectral method). Theoretical analysis shows that there is a reversible phase transition point in this TMF oscillator model, which can well explain the abrupt and reversible change of TMI. Finally, an analytical threshold formula of TMI was given to calculate the TMI threshold in the TMF oscillator with help of linear stability analysis near the phase transition point. The calculated results are consistent with the reported experimental results. The relationship between the TMI threshold and several parameters was also discussed in detail such as laser wavelength, pump wavelength, core radius, cladding radius, etc. This theoretical model will provide a clear explanation for TMI, which will be useful to understand and suppress TMI.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schematic of the double-cladding Yb-doped fiber. a and b are the core radius and cladding radius of the active fiber, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

2. General model

Here, a resonant cavity based on double-cladding Yb-doped fibers was considered, as shown in Fig. 1. The total length of the cavity is L, while a is the core radius and b is the cladding radius of the active fiber. The laser is assumed to be operated at single-frequency state and the pump light is transmitted in the cladding and evenly distributed along the fiber. Based on scalar wave equation of electric field [19]:

2E++2E+z2n2c22E+t2=μ02P+t2
where 2 is the transverse Laplacian. E+ and P+ are the signal electric field and resonant polarization intensity. n is refractive index of the fiber. By setting E+=F+(r,φ,z,t)exp [i(βzω0t)], P+=P+(x,y,z,t)exp [i(βzω0t)] and utilizing slowly varying amplitude approximation yields:
2iω0n2c2tF++2iω0neffczF++[2F++ω02c2(n2neff2)F+]=ω02μ0P+
where β is the propagation constant and ω0 is angular frequency of signal laser. neff=cβω01 is effective refractive index. The refractive index n depends on temperature change of the active fiber due to thermo-optic effect in high power fiber lasers. In the first two terms of Eq. (2), nneffn0 is used because the perturbation of the refractive index hardly affects the group velocity. By applying the first approximation of the refractive index perturbation [20] in the bracket of Eq. (2) and considering thermo-optic effect [9]:
n2neff2=(n0+Δn)2neff2(n0 2neff2)+2n0Δn
Δn=κT

Eq. (2) can be rewritten as:

2iω0n02c2tF++2iω0n0czF++2κn0ω02c2TF+=ω02μ0P+
where κ is thermo-optic coefficient and T is the temperature change. Note that the Helmholtz equation 2F++(ω02 c2)(n02neff2)F+=0 has been used in the derivation of Eq. (5). In two-level atoms system, P+ can be expressed as [21]:
P+=in0ε0cω0[(σes+σas)N2σasN]F+
where σes is the signal emission cross section, σas is the signal absorption cross section, N is doping concentration in the core of the active fiber. N2 is population of the upper level, which obey the time-evolution equation [14]:
N2t=N2τ[(σep+σap)N2σapN]P0πb2ωpn02μ0cω0[(σes+σas)N2σasN]|F|2
where τ is the upper state lifetime, σep is the pump emission cross section, σap is the pump absorption cross section, P0 is the pump power, ωp is the angular frequency of pump light. Noted that the terms containing |F|2 represents the total the upper numbers of atoms consumed by stimulated radiation per unit time and volume, which can be defined as ΔN=n02μ0cω0[(σes+σas)N2σasN]|F|2.

The temperature change T can be given by heat equation:

CρTtK2T=Q
where ρ, C and K are the density, the specific heat capacity and the thermal conductivity of the fiber material, respectively. For the high power fiber lasers, the quantum-defect is the main reason of fiber temperature increase. Ignoring longitudinal heat conduction and heat generated by linear loss of signal light and pump light, the heat source can be expressed as:
Q=ΔN(ωpω0)=n0(ωpω0)2μ0cω0[(σes+σas)N2σasN]|F|2

It is worth noting that this quantum-defect heat expressed by the above polynomial expression (Q) is more accurate than that by pump power (P0) [21] or signal intensity change (|F|2z) [14]. The reason is that the heat source is obtained in general cases, rather than in special cases (such as steady-state case t=0). Furthermore, unlike the expression in previous investigation, this modified polynomial expression is also easy for the following eigenmodes expansion analysis according to phase transition theory.

By setting D=N2σas(σes+σas)1N and using the results from Appendix A, taking the results from Appendix A, Eqs. (5), (7) and (8) can be transformed to the following dimensionless equations:

F+t+F+z=iηTF++ηF+D
Dt=γD+D0|F|2D
Ttμ2T=α|F|2D
where γ is dimensionless relaxation rate of reverse population and D0 is dimensionless initial inverted population. The detailed definitions of η, γ, μ, α and D0 can be found in Appendix A. Eqs. (10a) and (10b) represent a semi-classical laser equation with a phase modulation iηTF+ dependent on the temperature change. This temperature change is in turn dominated by stimulated radiation α|F|2D (see also in Eq. (10c)). Therefore, Eqs. (10a)-(10c) is a general dynamic model of TMI, which will be the starting point for the further analysis.

3. TMI model in TMF oscillator

In this section, by controlling the V-parameter of the fiber, one case on TMI emerges as a two-mode fiber (TMF) oscillator. Based on eigenmodes expansion analysis (spectral method, see also in Appendix B) and the results of Appendix C, a phase transition model of TMI in the TMF oscillator can be expressed as:

f0t=Γ0f0ηc102c2τ^1f1+ηc6c2f0d0
f1t=Γ1f1+ηc10c3τ^1f0+ηc7c3f1d0
d0t=γd0+c0c1D0(c11c1|f0|2d0+c122c1|f1|2d0)
τ^1t=μa2x112b2τ^1+αc15c5f0f1d0
where f0 and f1 are the real amplitudes with corresponding dimensionless relaxation rate Γ0 and Γ1 of LP01 mode and LP11 mode, respectively. d0 is the first term of cylindrical harmonic expansion of D. τ^1 is defined by τ1=2τ^1sin (Ωz+ϕ), and τ1 is the amplitude of T11 mode. ϕ=(ϕ0ϕ1) is the initial phase difference and Ω=(β0β1)cτn01 is dimensionless propagation constant difference. x11 is the first zeros of 1st order Bessel function of the first kind. The detailed form of ci(i=0,1,,15) can be found in Appendix C. Eqs. (11a) and (11b) represent the evolution of LP01 and LP11 mode over time. The first and third term of this two equations represent the loss and gain of the fiber oscillator respectively, and the second term represents the nonlinear coupling due to thermo-optic effect. Eq. (11c) represents the evolution of inverted population and the term in brackets represents stimulated radiation of the two modes. Eq. (11d) is evolution equation of thermal-induced grating.

In the following section, we look for a phase transition point based on Eqs. (11a)-(11d) with help of linear stability analysis near the single-mode (LP01) solution.

When pump power is low, the fiber oscillator generally operates in the LP01 mode. Correspondingly, Eqs. (11a)-(11d) must have a single-mode stationary solution. Therefore, by setting t=0, f00 and f1=0, the single-mode stationary solution can be obtained from Eqs. (11a)-(11d):

f1c=τ^1c=0,d0c=c2Γ0ηc6,|f0c|2=c0c6ηD0c2c11Γ0c1c11γc0c6ηD0c2c11Γ0

The linear stability of this single-mode solution is obtained by substituting f0=f0c+eλtδf0, f1=eλtδf1, d0=d0c+eλtδd0 and τ^1=eλtδτ^1 into Eqs. (11a)-(11d) and linearizing Eqs. (11a)-(11d) for small δ to obtain the eigenvalue problem:

Lv=λv
where v=(δf0,δf1,δd0,δτ^1)T, aT denotes the transpose of the matrix a, the coefficient matrix L can be expressed as:
L=[Γ0+ηc6c2d0c0ηc6c2f0c00Γ1+ηc7c3d0c0ηc10c3f0c2c11c1f0cd0c0γc11c1|f0c|200c15c5αf0cd0c0μa2x112b2]

Four eigenvalues are obtained in total, which can be ordered as:

Re(λ4)Re(λ3)Re(λ2)Re(λ1)

Eigenvalue λn with the lowest n or the largest Re(λn) is the so-called critical one. In other words, the stability of this single-mode solution is determined by λ1 under small perturbation. λ1 can be expressed as:

λ1= 12{(Γ1c2c7c3c6Γ0+μa2x112b2)24[(Γ1c2c7c3c6Γ0)(μa2x112b2)ηαc0c10c15c3c5c11D0]}1212(Γ1c2c7c3c6Γ0+μa2x112b2)

According to linear stability analysis, when Re(λ1)>0, the single-mode solution becomes unstable. Therefore, the unstable condition of the single-mode stationary solution is as following:

D0>D0th=c3c5c11c0c10c15μa2x112ηαb2(Γ1c2c7c3c6Γ0)
where D0 and D0th are the initial reverse population and the critical initial reverse population, respectively. Initially when D0<D0th (Re(λ1)<0), the heat production rate due to quantum-defect is relatively low and quantum-defect heating can be dissipated instantaneously by thermal diffusion, thus the thermally-induced RIG cannot be formed (τ^1=0) and the oscillator is operated in the LP01 mode. When increasing D0 and D0=D0th (Re(λ1)=0), the system is operated in a phase transition point and the RIG is initially triggered. When continuing to increase D0 and D0>D0th (Re(λ1)>0), the heat production rate is relatively high and the quantum-defect heating cannot be dissipated instantaneously by thermal diffusion, thus the thermally-induced RIG can be spontaneously formed (τ^10) and the oscillator jumps from LP01 mode state to a mixed state of LP01 mode and LP11 mode (f00,f10). Reversely, When reducing D0 and D0<D0th (Re(λ1)<0) again, the oscillator returns to the LP01 mode state.

Therefore, there is a phase transition point in the vicinity of the single-mode stationary solution. This phase transition point can well explain the sudden change characteristic of TMI. Furthermore, this phase transition process is reversible according to the above analysis, which also can explain why TMI is reversible effect. It is worth to mention that the above-mentioned two points are basic characteristics of TMI, but previous theories cannot clearly explain them.

4. Threshold discussion

Based on the above analysis, the RIG is initially triggered at D0=D0th, suggesting the pump power is equal to threshold power. Using the definition of D0 in appendix A and substituting it to D0=D0th, an analytical threshold formula of TMI can be obtained:

P0th=c3c5c11c0c10c15n0πKωp(σes+σas)x112Nκω0(ωpω0)(σesσapσasσep)(1τLP11c2c7c3c61τLP10)
where ci(i=0,2,,15) depends on the fiber parameters and can be calculated by MATLAB according to definitions of ci in Appendix C. ωp=2πcλp1 is the angular frequency of pump light, ω0=2πcλ01 is the angular frequency of signal light. τLP01=τ Γ0 and τLP11=τ Γ1 are the lifetime of LP01 and LP11 in the cavity, respectively. black

Tables Icon

Table 1. Parameters used in calculation

Here, the TMI threshold value is estimated for a typical fiber oscillator comprising a commercial fiber (Nufern, LMA-YDF-20/400-9M) and a pair commercial fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs, HR-99.6%, OC-8.7%), which is also used in the experimental study of fiber oscillators [22]. By using the parameters values in Table 1, we can obtain P0th=2.2 kW according to Eq. (18). This TMI threshold is quite close to the experimental pump power value 2.6kW (slope efficiency∼73%) in counter-pump scheme [22]. It is worth noted that the overlap factors ci(i=0,2,,15) in Table 1 are obtained when a=10μm and b=200μm. The lifetimes τLP01 and τLP11 in Table 1 is calculated according to the reflectivity of two fiber gratings and the bending losses of two modes. The bending losses of the two modes is mainly determined by the selected window of bending loss [23].

In the following section, the relationship between the TMI threshold and parameters is discussed. As seen in Eq. (18), the TMI threshold power is proportional to the thermal conductivity (K) and inversely proportional to the thermo-optic coefficient (κ), suggesting higher the thermal conductivity, the lower is temperature caused by quantum-defect and the higher power threshold. Similarly, larger is thermo-optic coefficient, smaller is the refractive change caused by the temperature and the higher power threshold. This relationship is consistent with the TMI threshold relationship in fiber amplifiers [14, 15].

Eq. (18) also presents the TMI threshold power inversely proportional to quantum-defect (ωpω0). Although there is a simple inverse relationship between the threshold and quantum-defect, the threshold is still complicatedly dependent on the pump and the signal frequency. Because the σes, σas, σep, σap of Eq. (18) are also dependent on the pump and signal frequency (or wavelength). In order to gain abetter understanding on the relationship with the signal and pump wavelength, we can calculate the TMI threshold value according to Eq. (18). Parameters used in calculation are also seen in Table 1.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) Threshold power vs the signal wavelength (λp = 976 nm); (b) Threshold power vs the pump wavelength in the long-wavelength pumping technology scheme (λ0 = 1.08 μm). Other parameters: a = 12 μm, b = 250 μm, τLP10=84 ns, τLP11=18 ns.

Download Full Size | PDF

Fig. 2(a) shows that the TMI threshold power decreases with the increasing of signal wavelength. This result has also been experimentally confirmed [24]. The main reason for this change is the increase of quantum-defect with the increasing of signal wavelength. Indeed, when λp=const=976 nm, it can be obtained by Eq. (18):

P0thωp(σes+σas)Nω0(ωpω0)(σesσapσasσep)λ02(λ0λp)Nσapλp2λ0λp+2λpλp2λ0λp1λ0λp

Note that we have assumed σesσas, σesσapσasσep and ignored the effect of signal wavelength change on the integral constants ci(i=0,2,,15) in the derivation of Eq. (19). Therefore, the TMI threshold can be improved by reducing the signal wavelength.

Another effective way to improve the TMI threshold is to adopt long-wavelength pump, such as the tandem-pumping technology [25]. Fig. 2(b) shows that the TMI threshold dramatically increases with the increasing of pump wavelength. Similarly, when λ0=const=1.08 μm, the relationship between the TMI threshold and the pump wavelength P0th(λ0λp)1σap1(λp) can be obtained by Eq. (19). Therefore, there are two reasons for the surprising increase of the TMI threshold with pump wavelength, namley λ0λp and σap(λp). But the effect of σap(λp) on the TMI threshold is much greater than that of λ0λp, For example, when pump wavelength λp=1020 nm is adopted, the TMI threshold is increased by 33 times comparing with λp=976 nm. Among them, λ0λp makes 1.7% contribution to increase of the TMI threshold, whereas σap(λp) makes 98.3% contribution. Therefore, the main reason for surprising increase of the TMI threshold by long-wavelength pumping is reduction of absorption cross section of pumped light. It is worth to mention that the important effect of σap(λp) on the TMI threshold have not been clarified in previous studies. Furthermore, this result is supported by the tandem-pumping scheme, by which IPG Photonics generates a 10-20 kW single-mode beam by utilizing λp=1018 nm [26].

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) Threshold power vs core radius (b = 250 μm). (b) Threshold power vs cladding radius (a = 12 μm). Other parameters: λp = 976 nm, λ0 = 1.08 μm, τrmLP10=84 ns, τLP11=18 ns.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) shows the TMI threshold as function of core radius and cladding radius. It can be observed that the TMI threshold decreases with the increasing of core radius, whereas the TMI threshold increases with the increasing of cladding radius. The relationship between threshold and core radius is qualitatively consistent with the results in [15], which is expressed as P0tha2. The above two relationships can be explained by the overlap ratio of temperature mode and laser mode. The TMI threshold is dependent on overlap integral ci(i=0,2,,15) due to P0thc3c5c11(c0c10c15)1. This bears a resemblance to the stimulated Brillouin scattering threshold, which depends on the overlap ratio between the laser mode and the excited acoustic mode [27]. When the core radius is reduced or the cladding radius is increased, the overlap ratio between the temperature mode and the laser mode is reduced. As a consequence, the temperature effect on the laser becomes smaller and the TMI threshold increases. Furthermore, the relationship between threshold and cladding radius can be approximately expressed as P0thb4 (see also Appendix C) in the TMF oscillator. Therefore, we can increase the threshold mainly by increasing the cladding radius. This is due to reducing the core radius may result in strong nonlinear effects.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 (a) Threshold power vs lifetime of LP01 (τLP11=18 ns). (b) Threshold power vs lifetime of LP11 (τLP01=84 ns). Other parameters: λp = 976 nm, λ0 = 1.08 μm, a = 12 μm, b = 250 μm.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figs. 4(a) and 4(b) shows the TMI threshold as function of the lifetime of LP01 and LP11 in the cavity. It can be seen that the TMI threshold increases with the increasing of the lifetime of LP01, whereas the TMI threshold decreases with the increasing of the lifetime of LP11. This can be explained by mode competition between LP01 and LP11. The longer the lifetime of LP01 or the shorter the lifetime of LP11, the stronger the competition ability of LP01 has. As a result, the higher TMI threshold can be obtained, vice versa. As seen in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), the TMI threshold is increased by 35 W when the lifetime of LP01is changed by 10 ns (from 80 ns to 90 ns), whereas the TMI threshold is increased by 1274 W when the lifetime of LP01 is changed by 10 ns (from 25 ns to 15 ns). Therefore, the TMI threshold can be mainly improved by reducing the lifetime ofLP11 mode such as reducing the fiber bending radius, adopting fiber Bragg gratings with low reflectivity for LP11 mode, which can be also useful to suppress the TMI in fiber oscillators.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, a phase transition model for understanding TMI in a TMF oscillator was established. Theoretical analysis shows that there is a reversible phase transition point in this TMF oscillator model, which can well explain the characteristic of sudden and reversible change of TMI. It is worth to mention that phase transition was used to understand TMI in fiber oscillators at the first time, which can provide a more clear explanation for TMI than previous studies. Furthermore, an analytical threshold formula of TMI was given to calculate the TMI threshold in TMF oscillator with help of linear stability analysis near the phase transition point. The calculated results are consistent with the reported experimental results. The relationship between the TMI threshold and several parameters was also discussed in detail such as laser wavelength, pump wavelength, core radius, cladding radius, lifetime of modes, etc. As a consequence, the TMI threshold can be dramatically increased by the increasing of pump wavelength. The main reason for surprising increase of the TMI threshold by long-wavelength pumping is reduction of absorption cross section of pumped light. The TMI threshold in the TMF oscillator is also found to be proportional to the fourth power of the cladding radius. Thus, the TMI threshold can be increased mainly by the increasing of cladding radius. Moreover, the TMI threshold also can be improved by reducing the lifetime of LP11 mode. This theoretical model and findings will be useful to understand and suppress the TMI in fiber oscillators.

Appendix A: Dimensionless equations

Substituting D=N2σas(σes+σas)1N into Eqs. (5), (7) and (8) yields:

2iω0n02c2tF++2iω0n0czF++2κn0ω0 2c2TF+=in0ω0(σes+σas)cF+D
tD=[πb2ωp+τ(σep+σap)P0τπb2ωp]D+[τ(σesσapσasσep)P0πb2ωpσasπb2ωp(σes+σas)τ]Nn0(σes+σas)2μ0cω0|F|2D
CρTtK2T=n0(ωpω0)(σes+σas)2μ0cω0|F|2D

For analytical convenience, let

F0=2μ0cω0n0(σes+σas)τD0=2ω0(σes+σas)cT0=1κt0=τr0=az0=cτn0
and
F+=F0F+ D=D0DT=T0T t=t0t r=r0r z=z0z 

By substituting Eqs. (21) and (22) into Eqs. (20a)-(20c) and removing the superscript " " of the variables, a set of non-dimensionlized equations is obtained

iF+t+iF+z+τω0n0TF+=iτω0n0F+D
Dt=[πb2ωp+τ(σep+σap)P0πb2ωp]D +[τc(σesσapσasσep)P0πcb2ωpσas2πb2ωpω0]N|F|2D
TtτKCρa22T=2κ(ωpω0)ω0Cρ(σes+σas)c|F|2D

By setting

η=τω0n0, μ=τKCρa2, α=2κ(ωpω0)ω0Cρ(σes+σas)c, γ=[πb2ωp+τ(σep+σap)P0πb2ωp]D0=[τc(σesσapσasσep)P0πcb2ωpσas2πb2ωpω0]Nτc(σesσapσasσep)NP02πb2ωpω0

Thus dimensionless equations are rewritten as:

F+t+F+z=iηTF++ηF+D
Dt=γD+D0|F|2D
Ttμ2T=α|F|2D

Appendix B: Reducing dimensions of Eqs. (25a)-(25c) by using spectral method

In order to obtain the analytical solution of Eqs. (25a)-(25c), spectral method is adopted, which is widely used to solve nonlinear partial differential equations [28]. F+ in Eq. (25a) meets the dimensionless Helmholtz equation

1a22F++ω02c2(n02neff2)F+=0

By setting

Bmn(r)={Jm(Umnr)r1Jm(Umn)Km(Wmn)Km(Wmnr)r1
where Jm and Km are m-th order Bessel function of the first kind and m-th order modified Bessel function of the second kind, respectively. Umn and Wmn are mode eigenvalue (Umn2+Kmn2=V2). V is V-parameter of the fiber. Then fiber mode fields are written as:
LPmnBmn(r)[sin mφcos mφ]

In TMF, F+ can be expressed as:

F+=f0+B01(r)exp [i(cτβ0n01zτω0t)]+f1+B11(r)sin φexp[i(cτβ1n01zτω0t)]=f0B01(r)exp [i(cτβ0n01zτω0t+ϕ0)]+f1B11(r)sin φexp [i(cτβ1n01zτω0t+ϕ1)]
where we have scaled r to a, z to cτn01 and t to τ. f0+ and f1+ are amplitudes with corresponding initial phase ϕ0 and ϕ1 and propagation constants β0 and β1 of LP01 and LP11 mode, respectively. Let
Ω=(β0β1)cτn01ϕ=(ϕ0ϕ1)
then |F|2 can be obtained from Eq. (29)
|F|2=|f0|2B012(r)+2f0f1B01(r)B11(r)sin φcos (Ωz+ϕ)+|f1|2B112(r)sin2φ

It is possible to expand D as cylindrical harmonic function series

DmnJm(xmnr)[sin mφcos mφ]
where xmn is n-th zeros of mst order Bessel function of the first kind. For simplicity, the first terms of the series is taken
D=d0J0(x01r)
where d0 is the coefficient of the first term.

The eigenvalue problem corresponding to the temperature T of Eq. (26) is

{1a22T=X2TT|r=b a=0
where X2 is constant. In this model, boundary condition is assumed to be homogeneous (Dirchlet boundary condition). This is because we can make the surface temperature of optical fiber cladding equal to surrounding temperature by water cooling in practice. Similarly, temperature field components are written as:
TmnJm(Xmnar)[sin mφcos mφ]
where Xmn=xmnb is eigenvalue of Tmn mode. For simplicity we take the first two terms of the series and T can be expressed as:
T=τ0J0(x01abr)+τ1J1(x11abr)sin φ
where τ0

and τ1 are mode amplitude functions of T01 and T11, respectively.

Appendix C: Dynamics model in TMF oscillator

In laser oscillators, mean field approximation (z=0) is usually utilized. Substitute Eqs. (29), (33) and (36) into Eq. (25), multiplying both sides by B01(r) and integrating both sides over the fiber cross section, one finds the mode amplitude f0+ obey:

f0+t=iη(c8c2τ0f0++c102c2f1+τ1exp [iΩz])+ηc6c2f0+d0

Similarly

f1+t=iη(c9c3τ0f1++c10c3τ1f0+exp [iΩz])+ηc7c3f1+d0
d0t=γd0+c0c1D0(c11c1|f0|2d0+c122c1|f1|2d0)
τ0t=μa2x012b2τ0+α(c13c4|f0|2d0+c142c4|f1|2d0)
τ1t=μa2x112b2τ1+2αc15c5f0f1d0cos (Ωz+ϕ)
where ci(i=0,1,,15) are the overlap factors between laser eigenmodes, temperature eigenmodes and inverted population, which will be given below. Eq. (41) shows that a thermally-induced RIG is produced due to the interference pattern between LP01 and LP11. From Eqs. (37), (38) and (41), the wave-vector mismatch is calculated as δ=ta0β1Ω(cτn01)1=0. Therefore, the phase matching condition is automatically satisfied. Note that the phase shift between RIG and the initial inter-mode interference pattern is taken as π 2, and the energy coupling is strongest according to the analysis [29]. In fact it can be proven from Eqs. (37), (38) and (41) that the energy coupling between the two modes does not exist if the phase shift is zero. Thus, Eq. (41) can be rewritten as:
τ1t=μa2x112b2τ1+2αc15c5f0f1d0cos (Ωz+ϕ+π2)

The overlap factor can be defined as:

c0=01J0(x01r)rdrc8=0b/aB012(r)J0(x01abr)rdrc1=01J02(x01r)rdrc9=0b/aB112(r)J0(x01abr)rdrc2=0b/aB012(r)rdrc10=0b/aB01(r)B11(r)J1(x11abr)rdrc3=0b/aB112(r)rdrc11=01B012(r)J02(x01r)rdrc4=0b/aJ02(x01abr)rdrc12=01B112(r)J02(x01r)rdrc5=0b/aJ12(x11abr)rdrc13=01B012(r)J0(x01r)J0(x01abr)rdrc6=01B012(r)J0(x01r)rdrc14=01B112(r)J0(x01r)J0(x01abr)rdrc7=01B112(r)J0(x01r)rdrc15=01B01(r)B11(r)J0(x01r)J1(x11abr)rdr

When core radius a, cladding radius b, and numerical aperture of the core are given, the overlap factor can be calculated by MATLAB. Moreover, when ba, we can obtain:

c8=0b/aB012(r)J0(x01abr)rdrJ0(0)0b/aB012(r)rdr=c2
c9=0b/aB112(r)J0(x01abr)rdrJ0(0)0b/aB112(r)rdr=c3

And

c5=0b/aJ12(x11abr)rdr=b2a201J12(x11R)RdR
c10=0b/aB01(r)B11(r)J1(x11abr)rdrx11ab01B01(r)B11(r)J1 (0)r2dr
c15=01B01(r)B11(r)J0(x01r)J1(x11abr)rdrx11ab01B01(r)B11(r)J0(x01r)J1 (0)r2dr

In the following section, Eqs. (37), (38) and (42) will be simplified by transforming complex equations into real ones. By setting τ1=2τ^1sin (Ωz+ϕ)=iτ^1(exp[i(Ωz+ϕ)]exp [i(Ωz+ϕ)] and substituting it into Eqs. (37) and (38) yields:

f0+t=iηc8c2τ0f0+ηc102c2f1+τ^1exp (iϕ)+ηc6c2f0+d0
f1+t=iηc9c3τ0f1++ηc10c3τ^1f0+exp (iϕ)+ηc7c3f1+d0

By substituting f0+=f0exp (iϕ0),f1+=f1exp (iϕ1) into Eqs. (46a) and (46b), assuming that Γ0 and Γ1 are dimensionless relaxation rates of LP01 and LP11 in the cavity and separating the real and imaginary parts of the equations, yields:

ϕt=iη(c8c2c9c3)τ0
f0t=Γ0f0ηc102c2f1τ^1+c6c2ηf0d0
f1t=Γ1f1+ηc10c3τ^1f0+c7c3ηf1d0

As seen in Eqs. (47a)-(47c), τ0 has no effect on the amplitude changes of the two modes. Although τ0 can modulate the phase of two modes, the phase difference ϕ is almost remained ϕt0, which can be obtain by Eqs. (47a), (44a) and (45b). Therefore, the evolution equations of τ0 and ϕ (Eqs. (40) and (47a)) can be decoupled from the equation system, and can also be ignored. By utilizing τ1=2τ^1sin (Ωz+ϕ), Eq. (42) can be rewritten as:

τ^1t=μa2x112b2τ^1+αc15c5f0f1d0

Thus, Eqs. (47b), (47c), (39) and (48) together form the dynamics model describing the TMI in the TMF oscillator, which can be rewritten as:

f0t=Γ0f0ηc102c2f1τ^1+c6c2ηf0d0
f1t=Γ1f1+ηc10c3τ^1f0+c7c3ηf1d0
d0t=γd0+c0c1D0(c11c1|f0|2d0+c122c1|f1|2d0)
τ^1t=μa2x112b2τ^1+αc15c5f0f1d0

Moreover, when a=const, the coefficient c3c5c11(c0c10c15)1 of the analytical threshold formula (see in Eq. (18)) can be approximately expressed as:

c3c5c11c0c10c15c5c10c15b2a2(x11ab)2b4

Funding

National Key R& D Program of China (2017YFB1104400).

References

1. C. Jauregui, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “High-power fibre lasers,” Nat. Photonics 7, 861–867 (2013). [CrossRef]  

2. J. Nilsson and D. N. Payne, “High-power fiber lasers,” Science 332, 921–922 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. D. J. Richardson, J. Nilsson, and W. A. Clarkson, “High power fiber lasers: current status and future perspectives [invited],” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, B63–B92 (2010). [CrossRef]  

4. C. Stihler, C. Jauregui, A. Tünnermann, and J. Limpert, “Modal energy transfer by thermally induced refractive index gratings in Yb-doped fibers,” Light. Sci. & Appl. 7, 59 (2018). [CrossRef]  

5. T. Eidam, C. Wirth, C. Jauregui, F. Stutzki, F. Jansen, H.-J. Otto, O. Schmidt, T. Schreiber, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Experimental observations of the threshold-like onset of mode instabilities in high power fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 19, 13218–13224 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. H.-J. Otto, F. Stutzki, F. Jansen, T. Eidam, C. Jauregui, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Temporal dynamics of mode instabilities in high-power fiber lasers and amplifiers,” Opt. Express 20, 15710–15722 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. H.-J. Otto, N. Modsching, C. Jauregui, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Impact of photodarkening on the mode instability threshold,” Opt. Express 23, 15265–15277 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. F. Stutzki, H.-J. Otto, F. Jansen, C. Gaida, C. Jauregui, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “High-speed modal decomposition of mode instabilities in high-power fiber lasers,” Opt. Lett. 36, 4572–4574 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. C. Jauregui, T. Eidam, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “The impact of modal interference on the beam quality of high-power fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 19, 3258–3271 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. A. V. Smith and J. J. Smith, “Mode instability in high power fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 19, 10180–10192 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. A. V. Smith and J. J. Smith, “Increasing mode instability thresholds of fiber amplifiers by gain saturation,” Opt. Express 21, 15168–15182 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. B. Ward, C. Robin, and I. Dajani, “Origin of thermal modal instabilities in large mode area fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 20, 11407–11422 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. J. Lægsgaard, “Static thermo-optic instability in double-pass fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 24, 13429–13443 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. M. N. Zervas, “Transverse mode instability analysis in fiber amplifiers,” Proc. SPIE 10083, 100830M (2017). [CrossRef]  

15. M. N. Zervas, “Transverse-modal-instability gain in high power fiber amplifiers: Effect of the perturbation relative phase,” APL Photonics 4, 022802 (2019). [CrossRef]  

16. G. Lemoult, L. Shi, K. Avila, S. V. Jalikop, M. Avila, and B. Hof, “Directed percolation phase transition to sustained turbulence in Couette flow,” Nat. Phys. 12, 254 (2016). [CrossRef]  

17. T. Ito, C. V. Young, and M. A. Cappelli, “Self-organization in planar magnetron microdischarge plasmas,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 254104 (2015). [CrossRef]  

18. E. Nakouzi and O. Steinbock, “Self-organization in precipitation reactions far from the equilibrium,” Sci. Adv. 2, e1601144 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. S. Hooker and C. Webb, Laser Physics (Oxford University, 2010).

20. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic, 2012).

21. S. Iakushev, M. Steinke, D. Kracht, J. Neumann, and P. Weßels, “Development of a comprehensive 3D model for transversal mode instability investigations,” Proc. SPIE 10683, 1068337 (2018).

22. B. Yang, H. Zhang, S. Chen, R. Tao, R. Su, P. Ma, X. Wang, P. Zhou, X. Xu, and Q. Lu, “3.05 kW monolithic fiber laser oscillator with simultaneous optimizations of stimulated raman scattering and transverse mode instability,” J.Opt. 20, 025802 (2018).

23. C. Ye, J. Koponen, V. Aallos, T. Kokki, L. Petit, and O. Kimmelma, “Measuring bend losses in large-mode-area fibers,” Proc. SPIE 9344, 934425 (2015). [CrossRef]  

24. R. Yagodkin, N. Platonov, A. Yusim, and V. P. Gapontsev, “>1.5kW narrow linewidth CW diffraction-limited fiber amplifier with 40nm bandwidth,” Proc. SPIE 9728, 972807 (2018).

25. C. A. Codemard, J. K. Sahu, and J. Nilsson, “Tandem cladding-pumping for control of excess gain in ytterbium-doped fiber amplifiers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46, 1860–1869 (2010). [CrossRef]  

26. J. Hecht, “Photonic frontiers: fiber lasers ramp up the power,” Laser Focus. World 45, 53–58 (2009).

27. A. Kobyakov, M. Sauer, and D. Chowdhury, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 2, 1–59 (2010). [CrossRef]  

28. T. Kapitula and K. Promislow, Spectral and Dynamical Stability of Nonlinear Waves (Springer, 2013). [CrossRef]  

29. C. Stihler, C. Jauregui, A. Tünnermann, and J. Limpert, “Phase-shift evolution of the thermally-induced refractive index grating in high-power fiber laser systems induced by pump-power variations,” Opt. Express 26, 19489–19497 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic of the double-cladding Yb-doped fiber. a and b are the core radius and cladding radius of the active fiber, respectively.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) Threshold power vs the signal wavelength (λp = 976 nm); (b) Threshold power vs the pump wavelength in the long-wavelength pumping technology scheme (λ0 = 1.08 μm). Other parameters: a = 12 μm, b = 250 μm, τ LP 10 = 84   ns, τ LP 11 = 18   ns.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Threshold power vs core radius (b = 250 μm). (b) Threshold power vs cladding radius (a = 12 μm). Other parameters: λp = 976 nm, λ0 = 1.08 μm, τ r m L P 10 = 84   ns, τ LP 11 = 18   ns.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) Threshold power vs lifetime of LP01 ( τ LP 11 = 18   ns). (b) Threshold power vs lifetime of LP11 ( τ LP 01 = 84   ns). Other parameters: λp = 976 nm, λ0 = 1.08 μm, a = 12 μm, b = 250 μm.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Parameters used in calculation

Equations (70)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

2 E + + 2 E + z 2 n 2 c 2 2 E + t 2 = μ 0 2 P + t 2
2 i ω 0 n 2 c 2 t F + + 2 i ω 0 n e f f c z F + + [ 2 F + + ω 0 2 c 2 ( n 2 n e f f 2 ) F + ] = ω 0 2 μ 0 P +
n 2 n e f f 2 = ( n 0 + Δ n ) 2 n e f f 2 ( n 0   2 n e f f 2 ) + 2 n 0 Δ n
Δ n = κ T
2 i ω 0 n 0 2 c 2 t F + + 2 i ω 0 n 0 c z F + + 2 κ n 0 ω 0 2 c 2 T F + = ω 0 2 μ 0 P +
P + = i n 0 ε 0 c ω 0 [ ( σ e s + σ a s ) N 2 σ a s N ] F +
N 2 t = N 2 τ [ ( σ e p + σ a p ) N 2 σ a p N ] P 0 π b 2 ω p n 0 2 μ 0 c ω 0 [ ( σ e s + σ a s ) N 2 σ a s N ] | F | 2
C ρ T t K 2 T = Q
Q = Δ N ( ω p ω 0 ) = n 0 ( ω p ω 0 ) 2 μ 0 c ω 0 [ ( σ e s + σ a s ) N 2 σ a s N ] | F | 2
F + t + F + z = i η T F + + η F + D
D t = γ D + D 0 | F | 2 D
T t μ 2 T = α | F | 2 D
f 0 t = Γ 0 f 0 η c 10 2 c 2 τ ^ 1 f 1 + η c 6 c 2 f 0 d 0
f 1 t = Γ 1 f 1 + η c 10 c 3 τ ^ 1 f 0 + η c 7 c 3 f 1 d 0
d 0 t = γ d 0 + c 0 c 1 D 0 ( c 11 c 1 | f 0 | 2 d 0 + c 12 2 c 1 | f 1 | 2 d 0 )
τ ^ 1 t = μ a 2 x 11 2 b 2 τ ^ 1 + α c 15 c 5 f 0 f 1 d 0
f 1 c = τ ^ 1 c = 0 , d 0 c = c 2 Γ 0 η c 6 , | f 0 c | 2 = c 0 c 6 η D 0 c 2 c 11 Γ 0 c 1 c 11 γ c 0 c 6 η D 0 c 2 c 11 Γ 0
L v = λ v
L = [ Γ 0 + η c 6 c 2 d 0 c 0 η c 6 c 2 f 0 c 0 0 Γ 1 + η c 7 c 3 d 0 c 0 η c 10 c 3 f 0 c 2 c 11 c 1 f 0 c d 0 c 0 γ c 11 c 1 | f 0 c | 2 0 0 c 15 c 5 α f 0 c d 0 c 0 μ a 2 x 11 2 b 2 ]
Re ( λ 4 ) Re ( λ 3 ) Re ( λ 2 ) Re ( λ 1 )
λ 1 =   1 2 { ( Γ 1 c 2 c 7 c 3 c 6 Γ 0 + μ a 2 x 11 2 b 2 ) 2 4 [ ( Γ 1 c 2 c 7 c 3 c 6 Γ 0 ) ( μ a 2 x 11 2 b 2 ) η α c 0 c 10 c 15 c 3 c 5 c 11 D 0 ] } 1 2 1 2 ( Γ 1 c 2 c 7 c 3 c 6 Γ 0 + μ a 2 x 11 2 b 2 )
D 0 > D 0 th = c 3 c 5 c 11 c 0 c 10 c 15 μ a 2 x 11 2 η α b 2 ( Γ 1 c 2 c 7 c 3 c 6 Γ 0 )
P 0 th = c 3 c 5 c 11 c 0 c 10 c 15 n 0 π K ω p ( σ e s + σ a s ) x 11 2 N κ ω 0 ( ω p ω 0 ) ( σ e s σ a p σ a s σ e p ) ( 1 τ LP 11 c 2 c 7 c 3 c 6 1 τ LP 10 )
P 0 th ω p ( σ e s + σ a s ) N ω 0 ( ω p ω 0 ) ( σ e s σ a p σ a s σ e p ) λ 0 2 ( λ 0 λ p ) N σ a p λ p 2 λ 0 λ p + 2 λ p λ p 2 λ 0 λ p 1 λ 0 λ p
2 i ω 0 n 0 2 c 2 t F + + 2 i ω 0 n 0 c z F + + 2 κ n 0 ω 0   2 c 2 T F + = i n 0 ω 0 ( σ e s + σ a s ) c F + D
t D = [ π b 2 ω p + τ ( σ e p + σ a p ) P 0 τ π b 2 ω p ] D + [ τ ( σ e s σ a p σ a s σ e p ) P 0 π b 2 ω p σ a s π b 2 ω p ( σ e s + σ a s ) τ ] N n 0 ( σ e s + σ a s ) 2 μ 0 c ω 0 | F | 2 D
C ρ T t K 2 T = n 0 ( ω p ω 0 ) ( σ e s + σ a s ) 2 μ 0 c ω 0 | F | 2 D
F 0 = 2 μ 0 c ω 0 n 0 ( σ e s + σ a s ) τ D 0 = 2 ω 0 ( σ e s + σ a s ) c T 0 = 1 κ t 0 = τ r 0 = a z 0 = c τ n 0
F + = F 0 F +   D = D 0 D T = T 0 T   t = t 0 t   r = r 0 r   z = z 0 z  
i F + t + i F + z + τ ω 0 n 0 T F + = i τ ω 0 n 0 F + D
D t = [ π b 2 ω p + τ ( σ e p + σ a p ) P 0 π b 2 ω p ] D   + [ τ c ( σ e s σ a p σ a s σ e p ) P 0 π c b 2 ω p σ a s 2 π b 2 ω p ω 0 ] N | F | 2 D
T t τ K C ρ a 2 2 T = 2 κ ( ω p ω 0 ) ω 0 C ρ ( σ e s + σ a s ) c | F | 2 D
η = τ ω 0 n 0 ,   μ = τ K C ρ a 2 ,   α = 2 κ ( ω p ω 0 ) ω 0 C ρ ( σ e s + σ a s ) c ,   γ = [ π b 2 ω p + τ ( σ e p + σ a p ) P 0 π b 2 ω p ] D 0 = [ τ c ( σ e s σ a p σ a s σ e p ) P 0 π c b 2 ω p σ a s 2 π b 2 ω p ω 0 ] N τ c ( σ e s σ a p σ a s σ e p ) N P 0 2 π b 2 ω p ω 0
F + t + F + z = i η T F + + η F + D
D t = γ D + D 0 | F | 2 D
T t μ 2 T = α | F | 2 D
1 a 2 2 F + + ω 0 2 c 2 ( n 0 2 n e f f 2 ) F + = 0
B m n ( r ) = { J m ( U m n r ) r 1 J m ( U m n ) K m ( W m n ) K m ( W m n r ) r 1
L P m n B m n ( r ) [ sin  m φ cos  m φ ]
F + = f 0 + B 01 ( r ) exp   [ i ( c τ β 0 n 0 1 z τ ω 0 t ) ] + f 1 + B 11 ( r ) sin   φ exp [ i ( c τ β 1 n 0 1 z τ ω 0 t ) ] = f 0 B 01 ( r ) exp   [ i ( c τ β 0 n 0 1 z τ ω 0 t + ϕ 0 ) ] + f 1 B 11 ( r ) sin   φ exp   [ i ( c τ β 1 n 0 1 z τ ω 0 t + ϕ 1 ) ]
Ω = ( β 0 β 1 ) c τ n 0 1 ϕ = ( ϕ 0 ϕ 1 )
| F | 2 = | f 0 | 2 B 01 2 ( r ) + 2 f 0 f 1 B 01 ( r ) B 11 ( r ) sin  φ cos  ( Ω z + ϕ ) + | f 1 | 2 B 11 2 ( r ) sin 2 φ
D m n J m ( x m n r ) [ sin  m φ cos  m φ ]
D = d 0 J 0 ( x 01 r )
{ 1 a 2 2 T = X 2 T T | r = b   a = 0
T m n J m ( X m n a r ) [ sin  m φ cos  m φ ]
T = τ 0 J 0 ( x 01 a b r ) + τ 1 J 1 ( x 11 a b r ) sin  φ
f 0 + t = i η ( c 8 c 2 τ 0 f 0 + + c 10 2 c 2 f 1 + τ 1 exp  [ i Ω z ] ) + η c 6 c 2 f 0 + d 0
f 1 + t = i η ( c 9 c 3 τ 0 f 1 + + c 10 c 3 τ 1 f 0 + exp  [ i Ω z ] ) + η c 7 c 3 f 1 + d 0
d 0 t = γ d 0 + c 0 c 1 D 0 ( c 11 c 1 | f 0 | 2 d 0 + c 12 2 c 1 | f 1 | 2 d 0 )
τ 0 t = μ a 2 x 01 2 b 2 τ 0 + α ( c 13 c 4 | f 0 | 2 d 0 + c 14 2 c 4 | f 1 | 2 d 0 )
τ 1 t = μ a 2 x 11 2 b 2 τ 1 + 2 α c 15 c 5 f 0 f 1 d 0 c o s   ( Ω z + ϕ )
τ 1 t = μ a 2 x 11 2 b 2 τ 1 + 2 α c 15 c 5 f 0 f 1 d 0 cos  ( Ω z + ϕ + π 2 )
c 0 = 0 1 J 0 ( x 01 r ) r d r c 8 = 0 b / a B 01 2 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 a b r ) r d r c 1 = 0 1 J 0 2 ( x 01 r ) r d r c 9 = 0 b / a B 11 2 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 a b r ) r d r c 2 = 0 b / a B 01 2 ( r ) r d r c 10 = 0 b / a B 01 ( r ) B 11 ( r ) J 1 ( x 11 a b r ) r d r c 3 = 0 b / a B 11 2 ( r ) r d r c 11 = 0 1 B 01 2 ( r ) J 0 2 ( x 01 r ) r d r c 4 = 0 b / a J 0 2 ( x 01 a b r ) r d r c 12 = 0 1 B 11 2 ( r ) J 0 2 ( x 01 r ) r d r c 5 = 0 b / a J 1 2 ( x 11 a b r ) r d r c 13 = 0 1 B 01 2 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 r ) J 0 ( x 01 a b r ) r d r c 6 = 0 1 B 01 2 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 r ) r d r c 14 = 0 1 B 11 2 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 r ) J 0 ( x 01 a b r ) r d r c 7 = 0 1 B 11 2 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 r ) r d r c 15 = 0 1 B 01 ( r ) B 11 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 r ) J 1 ( x 11 a b r ) r d r
c 8 = 0 b / a B 01 2 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 a b r ) r d r J 0 ( 0 ) 0 b / a B 01 2 ( r ) r d r = c 2
c 9 = 0 b / a B 11 2 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 a b r ) r d r J 0 ( 0 ) 0 b / a B 11 2 ( r ) r d r = c 3
c 5 = 0 b / a J 1 2 ( x 11 a b r ) r d r = b 2 a 2 0 1 J 1 2 ( x 11 R ) R d R
c 10 = 0 b / a B 01 ( r ) B 11 ( r ) J 1 ( x 11 a b r ) r d r x 11 a b 0 1 B 01 ( r ) B 11 ( r ) J 1   ( 0 ) r 2 d r
c 15 = 0 1 B 01 ( r ) B 11 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 r ) J 1 ( x 11 a b r ) r d r x 11 a b 0 1 B 01 ( r ) B 11 ( r ) J 0 ( x 01 r ) J 1   ( 0 ) r 2 d r
f 0 + t = i η c 8 c 2 τ 0 f 0 + η c 10 2 c 2 f 1 + τ ^ 1 exp  ( i ϕ ) + η c 6 c 2 f 0 + d 0
f 1 + t = i η c 9 c 3 τ 0 f 1 + + η c 10 c 3 τ ^ 1 f 0 + exp  ( i ϕ ) + η c 7 c 3 f 1 + d 0
ϕ t = i η ( c 8 c 2 c 9 c 3 ) τ 0
f 0 t = Γ 0 f 0 η c 10 2 c 2 f 1 τ ^ 1 + c 6 c 2 η f 0 d 0
f 1 t = Γ 1 f 1 + η c 10 c 3 τ ^ 1 f 0 + c 7 c 3 η f 1 d 0
τ ^ 1 t = μ a 2 x 11 2 b 2 τ ^ 1 + α c 15 c 5 f 0 f 1 d 0
f 0 t = Γ 0 f 0 η c 10 2 c 2 f 1 τ ^ 1 + c 6 c 2 η f 0 d 0
f 1 t = Γ 1 f 1 + η c 10 c 3 τ ^ 1 f 0 + c 7 c 3 η f 1 d 0
d 0 t = γ d 0 + c 0 c 1 D 0 ( c 11 c 1 | f 0 | 2 d 0 + c 12 2 c 1 | f 1 | 2 d 0 )
τ ^ 1 t = μ a 2 x 11 2 b 2 τ ^ 1 + α c 15 c 5 f 0 f 1 d 0
c 3 c 5 c 11 c 0 c 10 c 15 c 5 c 10 c 15 b 2 a 2 ( x 11 a b ) 2 b 4
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.