Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Enhanced stimulated Raman scattering of water by KOH

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) of water and a 1 M KOH–H2O solution are investigated using a Nd:YAG laser in both forward and backward directions. An obvious enhanced SRS signal is realized by dissolving KOH in liquid water. Compared with pure water, the performance improvements include the appearance of low-wavenumber Raman peaks, higher Raman intensity, an increased Raman gain, and an enhanced hydrogen bonding network. In this paper, the SRS enhancement phenomenon is explained from both the hydrogen bonding structure and the mechanism of stimulated Raman scattering. We consider it to be a very important SRS enhancement technique, which is low cost, simple, but reliable. Meanwhile, it can easily be extended to other alkali hydroxides.

© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Water is one of the most important substances in nature and has been extensively investigated over the past decades [15]. Despite its apparent molecular simplicity, it has been long considered with complex properties. More importantly, as a common solvent, water can dissolve various solutes. It is always a fascinating research field because of the role in chemistry, biology, electrochemistry, geography and so on [69]. Many researches have been conducted to analyze the structure and properties of water over the past decades. Experiment probes include nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray diffraction, neutron scattering, IR absorption, and Raman spectroscopy [1013]. Among them, SRS has been proved a useful tool to investigate water structure under different conditions [1417]. SRS study of liquid water can give important information about H-bonds network structure and dynamics. Particularly, OH vibration modes of water molecules can be easily and accurately identified by the sharp peaks in SRS spectra [1822]. With the discovery of the SRS phenomenon, the study of water structure is presented with a novel breakthrough [1618].

However, Raman scattering cross section of water is inherently small, which is about 10−30 cm2 for a single molecule. High-quality Raman spectra require not only a long integration time and high-power excitation, but also the low excitation wavelength. Due to the basic and practical application of SRS method in detecting water, how to provide a cheap but convenient method to enhance the SRS signals of water has been of great interest. Previously, several different methods have been attempted to solve this problem, including cooling [16], focusing [19,23], and pumping with stimulated Brillouin scattering [24]. These methods are very important and useful, but have relatively high requirements on external environment and experimental equipment. Some studies have achieved SRS enhancement through the resonance method, but need to limit the wavelength of the incident laser [20].

In this paper, we realized an obvious enhanced SRS signal by dissolving KOH in liquid water. The spectra of water and KOH-H2O solution exhibit different characteristics. Only one peak appears in the FSRS (forward stimulated Raman scattering) spectrum of water, comparing with two peaks in KOH-H2O solution. Especially, a relatively low-wavenumber peak appears at 3200 cm−1 in BSRS (backward stimulated Raman scattering) spectrum of KOH-H2O solution, representing the formation of ice Ih-like structure. Meanwhile, the normalized SRS peak intensity of KOH-H2O solution is also higher than that of water at same conditions. The reason for enhanced SRS signals can be divided into two aspects: i) the electric field generated by KOH softens and elongates the O-H bond and stiffens and shortens the O:H nonbond, leading to the enhancement of H-bonds network in water molecules; and ii) dissolving KOH in water increases the third-order Raman susceptibility, thereby increases the Raman gain coefficient of water molecules. Compared to previous research, the solute in our research undergoes dissociation in water forming mono-atomic ions (K+ and OH-) that are not Raman-active. This makes our stimulated Raman spectra simpler, which also excludes some influencing effects (for example, the assignment of some overlapping peaks). SRS enhancement phenomenon is explained not only from hydrogen bonds structure but also from the mechanism of stimulated Raman scattering. We quite optimistically believe that our results can open the way to understand the interaction between water molecules and other alkali hydroxides. More importantly, from the application point of view, we provide a simple but convenient method for enhanced SRS signals of water molecules.

2. Experimental step

The pure water and the liquid water of KOH-H2O solution (1 M) have been deionized from triple distilled water. The resistivity of the water is 17.3 M.Ω·cm. Samples are kept in a quartz cell whose width, height, and length are 1, 5, and 10 cm, respectively. The focal length of the lens is 15 cm. The length, width and thickness of dichroic (transmission: reflectivity=50%: 50%) are 80, 80 and 1.1 mm, respectively. Second harmonic of the pulsed Nd-YAG laser with a wavelength of 532 nm is used as excitation laser and focused in the quartz cell. The pulse duration is 12 ns, and the repetition rate is 10 Hz. Optical power density and diameter are 1.4×1012 Wcm−2 and 4 mm, respectively. Spectra are obtained by using an objective lens with times 50 long working distance. Output light is accepted by a spectrometer and signals are analyzed by a computer. The experimental setup is shown as Fig. 1.

The scanning speed of spontaneous Raman spectra is 10 cm−1/s and the spectral resolution is 1 cm−1. Samples are kept in a quartz disk of 10 mm radius and excited by an Argon laser at 514.5 nm with an output power of 10 mW. A 50× long working distance objective lens is located in different samples. Spectra are measured by Renishaw InVia Raman micro spectrometer and detected with a CCD detector. THMSG Linkam G600 heating-freezing with 0.1 K accuracy is used to control the temperature of ice Ih in spontaneous Raman scattering process. All experiments are carried out at ambient pressure.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup to measure SRS spectra. Insert: SRS spectra of liquid water.

Download Full Size | PDF

Preparation of ice Ih samples: Oriented single crystals of H2O are grown inside sample cell using the following technique. Cold air from a laminar flow cooler is directed across the sample cell. The temperature is lowered a few degrees below the freezing point of water to initiate freezing. Slowly cool the sample to avoid the generation of bubbles. If little bubbles still generated during this process, warm solution can be injected to milt the surrounding water molecules, and then completely eliminate the bubbles. The temperature of the cold air can be adjusted to melt back the polycrystalline mass to one seed crystal which may be regrown to fill the entire cooled volume of the sample cell. Reorientation of a crystal whose axis is not quite horizontal is accomplished by the following steps: the melting zone of the crystal is rarely completely parallel to the walls of sample cell in a warm air flow. A slanted interface forms between solid and liquid. As the crystal melts it tends to rotate about a horizontal axis as it floats upward. The rotation can be stopped by abruptly lowering the temperature of the air flow a few degrees below the freezing point. Then reoriented crystal can be regrown to fill the cooled sample cell volume.

3. Results and discussions

Figure 2(a) is FSRS spectra of liquid water and 1 M KOH-H2O solution. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the Raman shift of the main peak in liquid water is 3390 cm−1, which corresponds to the ordinary OH stretching vibration of water molecules [2,25]. However, two peaks appear approximately at 3350 and 3409 cm−1 in the spectrum of KOH-H2O solution. The assignment of peak at 3409 cm−1 (of KOH-H2O solution) is the same as the main peak of pure water. The peak at 3350 cm−1 attributes to OH stretching vibration of water in the liquid phase. According to previous researches, the Raman shift is inversely proportional to the bond energy [2628]. When the hydrogen bond energy is lower than 15 kJ/ mol, it belongs to weak hydrogen bond [27,28]; Otherwise, it belongs to strong hydrogen bond. Hydrogen bond strength of the peak at 3350 cm−1 (15.5 kJ/mol, strong hydrogen bond) is greater than that of 3390 cm−1 (13 kJ/mol, weak hydrogen bond), as shown in Fig. 3.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. SRS spectra of liquid water and 1 M KOH-H2O solution in (a) forward direction and (b) backward direction.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. The relationship between OH stretching vibration and hydrogen bonds energy. Purple: pure water. Light blue: KOH-H2O solution. The horizontal axis is attained from electronic structure calculations. The model used in calculation is Lewis structure mode [29].

Download Full Size | PDF

Simultaneously, the BSRS spectra of liquid water and KOH-H2O solution are also measured under same conditions as shown in Fig. 2(b). The BSRS spectrum of liquid water shows two characteristic peaks which cannot be observed in FSRS. The stronger peak appears at 3359 cm−1. The shoulder peak appears at 3385 cm−1. Meanwhile, there are also two peaks appear in the spectrum of KOH-H2O solution in backward direction. The Raman shifts of them are 3200 and 3359 cm−1. Hydrogen bonds energies of the peaks at 3200 (22.3 kJ/mol, strong hydrogen bonds) and 3359 cm−1 are respectively higher than that of 3359 and 3385 cm−1 as shown in Fig. 3. The SRS peak intensity of KOH-H2O solution is also much greater than that of pure water in both forward and backward direction.

These phenomena indicate an obvious improvement in the SRS signal of liquid water with the presence of KOH. In addition, hydrogen bonds network in KOH-H2O solution is also stronger than that of pure water. We obtain the spontaneous Raman spectrum (at 253 K) and FSRS spectrum of ice Ih at the same time (Fig. 4). These spectra show that the characteristic peak of ice Ih is at around 3200 cm−1. Therefore, the peak at 3200 cm−1 of 1 M KOH-H2O solution represents the formation of ice Ih-like structure. The appearance of ice-like structure further verifies the idea that hydrogen bonding structure of water molecules is strengthened in KOH-H2O solution.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a) Spontaneous Raman spectrum of ice Ih at 253 K; (b) FSRS spectrum of ice Ih.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 5 is spontaneous Raman spectra of pure water and KOH-H2O solution in the range from 2800 to 4000 cm−1. Raman shifts and FWHMs of peaks are listed in Table 1. The bands of pure water at 3190 and 3418 cm−1 are assigned to the symmetric and asymmetric O-H stretching vibrations, respectively. Three Raman peaks appear at 3200, 3432 and 3612 cm−1 in the spectra of 1 M KOH-H2O solution. The assignments of the peaks at 3200 and 3432 cm−1 are the same as the peak at 3190 and 3418 cm−1. The shoulder peak at 3612 cm−1 attributes to free OH vibrational mode. Raman spectra show that the FWHMs (full width at half maximum) of peaks in 1 M KOH-H2O solution are narrower than that of pure water. As it known to all, the Raman gain coefficient (gss) is proportional to the probability of Raman transition $\left( {\frac{{dw{f_i}}}{{d({\hbar w} )}}} \right)$, but it is inversely proportional to the FWHM ($\hbar {\Gamma }$) as shown in Eq. (1) [30].

$$\frac{{dw{f_i}}}{{d({\hbar w} )}} \propto \textrm{g}({\hbar \delta w} )= \frac{{\hbar {\Gamma }/\pi }}{{{\hbar ^2}({\delta {w^2}} )+ {\hbar ^2}{{\Gamma }^2}}} \propto \frac{1}{{\hbar {\Gamma }}}$$

The g$({\hbar \delta w})$ is joint state density of Raman transition. So, we draw a conclusion that the Raman gain coefficient of water molecules is increasing with the presence of KOH.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Spontaneous Raman spectra of (a) KOH-H2O solution and (b) pure water. Peak fitting of the spectra was achieved by Origin software.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparison of the Raman bands observed in pure water and KOH-H2O solution.

In summary, above all experimental results show that SRS signal is enhanced by the dissolution of KOH. Meanwhile, we also performed above experiments on NaOH-H2O solution and obtained the same experimental results: SRS signal is also enhanced with the presence of NaOH.

We propose that the enhancement mechanism of SRS in water induced by KOH is as follows. It is known that the entire hydrogen bond is defined to be O:H−O [31,32]. The H−O bond represents the intramolecular polar-covalent bond and the O:H bond means the intermolecular van der Waals bond. The H−O bond (∼4.0 eV) is much shorter, stronger, and stiffer than the O:H bond (∼0.1 eV). H atom serves as the point of reference in the O:H−O system. Dissociation of KOH in water yields the monovalent K+ and OH- ions. Each K+ and OH- ion acts as a charge center, generating a radial electrostatic field (E), as shown in Fig. 6(a). The electric field modulates the two segments (H−O and O:H) cooperatively through the repulsion between electron pairs on the adjacent oxygen anions. It softens and elongates the O-H bond and stiffens and shortens the O:H nonbond, which has the same effect as high pressure to pure water [Fig. 6(b)] [30]. However, the softer O:H bond always relaxes more in length than the stiffer H−O bond does in the same direction. So, the hydrogen bonds between water molecules in KOH-H2O solution are strengthened under the compression of the electric field. At the same time, due to the effect of the electric field, water molecules move towards the OH- ions and aggregate together [30], resulting in the formation of more hydrogen bonds between the water molecules. So, an ice-like structure appears in this condition. Therefore, we consider that this electrostatic field causes the enhanced SRS of liquid water.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. (a) Schematic diagram of KOH dissolved in liquid water; (b) Cooperative relaxation of the segmented O:H-O bond in KOH-H2O solution. White ball: oxygen atom; red ball: hydrogen atom; blue ball: the nonbonding lone pair; and dotted line: the original position of the water. H atom is the reference origin. This is only a schematic diagram and does not represent the actual molecular size and number of binding molecules.

Download Full Size | PDF

It is well known that the polarization of nonlinear light scattering (PNL) is an expansion starting with a second-order P(2) and third-order P(3) polarization, followed by higher order terms [33].

$${P_{NL}}({{w_0}} )= {P^{(2 )}}({{w_0}} )+ {P^{(3 )}}({{w_0}} )+ \cdots ,$$

SRS is a coherent and strong excitation nonlinear process: initially, excited photons and Stokes photons (${w_s}$) are generated by the collision of pump light incident photons (${w_p}$) and thermal vibrational phonons (${w_v} = {w_p} - {w_s}$). Then the incident photons collide with the excited phonons to produce Stokes photons and more excited phonons. Finally, an avalanche process is formed, as shown in Fig. 7 [34]. We only need to consider third-order P(3) polarization at SRS process.

$${P^{(3 )}}({{w_s}} )= 6{\varepsilon _0}{\chi ^{(3 )}}({ - {w_s};{w_p}, - {w_p},{w_s}} ):{E_p}E_P^{\ast}{E_s}$$

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of stimulated Raman scattering.

Download Full Size | PDF

Where ${\varepsilon _0}$ and ${\chi ^{(3 )}}$ are the dielectric constant and third-order Raman susceptibility, respectively. Adding an electrostatic field (${E_{dc}}$) to water (${E_{dc}}$ of pure water is 0) does not influence the Stokes (${w_s}$) and thermal vibrational (${w_v}$) frequencies. Previous research shows that third-order susceptibility is proportional to the potential difference generated by the electrostatic field. So, the electrostatic field (generated by the dissolution of KOH in water) can enhance the third-order nonlinear Raman susceptibility ${\chi ^{(3 )}}$ of water molecules.

$${G_{ss}} \propto {\chi^{(3 )}}$$

Raman gain coefficient (${G_{ss}}$) is proportional to ${\chi ^{(3 )}}$ [Eq. (4)]. Therefore, SRS signals are greatly enhanced by dissolving a small amount of KOH.

4. Conclusion

We investigate water and KOH-H2O solution by SRS in both forward and backward directions. It is found that the hydrogen bonds in KOH-H2O solution is stronger than that in pure water at same conditions. Importantly, we observe an ice Ih-like structure in KOH-H2O solution. Moreover, the normalized SRS intensity of KOH-H2O solution is also higher than that of liquid water. These phenomena indicate that KOH can enhance the stimulated Raman scattering of water molecules. The enhancement mechanism is attributed to the effect of electric field induced by KOH. This electric field not only strengthens the network structure in the water, but also increases the Raman gain coefficient, leading to the enhancement stimulated Raman scattering of water molecules. Our experimental results not only shed light on the interaction between alkali and water molecules, but also provide a simple and convenient method for enhancing stimulated Raman scattering of water molecules.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11574113, 11604024).

Acknowledgments

I would like to show my deepest gratitude to Boufei Hou, Ye Zhang and Xin Li, who have been such good friends to me over the years. You are an indispensable part of my life.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. S. Meng, L. F. Xu, E. G. Wang, and S. Gao, “Vibrational recognition of hydrogen-bonded water networks on a metal surface,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(17), 176104 (2002). [CrossRef]  

2. H. Yui, M. Fujinami, T. Kitamori, and T. Sawada, “Spectroscopic analysis of stimulated Raman scattering in the early stage of laser-induced breakdown in water,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82(20), 4110–4113 (1999). [CrossRef]  

3. W. R. Fawcett, “The role of lateral interactions in determining the properties of a dipolar monolayer at a polarizable interface,” J. Chem. Phys. 93(9), 6813–6819 (1990). [CrossRef]  

4. Y. Wang, F. Li, C. Sun, W. Fang, and Z. Men, “Exploring hydrogen bonds network behavior of ethanol-water systems on stimulated Raman scattering,” J. Mol. Liq. 295, 111705 (2019). [CrossRef]  

5. Y. Marcus, “Structure of Mixtures of Water and Methanol Derived from Their Cohesive Energy Densities and Internal Pressures from Subambient Temperatures to 473 K,” J. Phys. Chem. B 121(4), 863–866 (2017). [CrossRef]  

6. H. Kanno and J. Hiraishi, “A Raman study of aqueous KOH solution in glassy state,” Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 58(9), 2701–2702 (1985). [CrossRef]  

7. G. E. Walrafen and R. T. W. Douglas, “Raman spectra from very concentrated aqueous NaOH and from wet and dry, solid, and anhydrous molten, LiOH, NaOH, and KOH,” J. Chem. Phys. 124(11), 114504 (2006). [CrossRef]  

8. X. Zhang, Y. Xu, Y. Zhou, Y. Gong, Y. Huang, and C. Q. Sun, “HCl, KCl and KOH solvation resolved solute-solvent interactions and solution surface stress,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 422, 475–481 (2017). [CrossRef]  

9. F. Li, Z. Li, S. Wang, S. Li, Z. Men, S. Ouyang, and C. Sun, “Structure of water molecules from Raman measurements of cooling different concentrations of NaOH solutions,” Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 183, 425–430 (2017). [CrossRef]  

10. M. Vedadi, A. Choubey, K. Nomura, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, P. Vashishta, and A. C. T. van Duin, “Structure and dynamics of shock-induced nanobubble collapse in water,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(1), 014503 (2010). [CrossRef]  

11. Z. Sun, L. Zheng, M. Chen, M. L. Klein, F. Paesani, and X. Wu, “Electron-hole Theory of the Effect of Quantum Nuclei on the X-ray Absorption Spectra of Liquid Water,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(13), 137401 (2018). [CrossRef]  

12. T. R. Prisk, C. Hoffmann, A. I. Kolesnikov, E. Mamontov, A. A. Podlesnyak, X. Wang, P. R. C. Kent, and L. M. Anovitz, “Fast Rotational Diffusion of Water Molecules in a 2D Hydrogen Bond Network at Cryogenic Temperatures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(19), 196001 (2018). [CrossRef]  

13. M. Kropman and H. Bakker, “Dynamics of water molecules in aqueous solvation shells,” Science 291(5511), 2118–2120 (2001). [CrossRef]  

14. B. G. Saar, C. W. Freudiger, J. Reichman, C. M. Stanley, G. R. Holtom, and X. S. Xie, “Video-rate molecular imaging in vivo with stimulated Raman scattering,” Science 330(6009), 1368–1370 (2010). [CrossRef]  

15. Y. Ozeki, W. Umemura, Y. Otsuka, S. Satoh, H. Hashimoto, K. Sumimura, N. Nishizawa, K. Fukui, and K. Itoh, “High-speed molecular spectral imaging of tissue with stimulated Raman scattering,” Nat. Photonics 6(12), 845–851 (2012). [CrossRef]  

16. Y. Ganot, S. Shrenkel, B. D. Barmashenko, and I. Bar, “Enhanced stimulated Raman scattering in temperature controlled liquid water,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105(6), 061107 (2014). [CrossRef]  

17. Z. Men, W. Fang, D. Li, Z. Li, and C. Sun, “Raman spectra from symmetric hydrogen bonds in water by high-intensity laser-induced breakdown,” Sci. Rep. 4(1), 4606 (2015). [CrossRef]  

18. Y. Wang, F. Li, Z. Li, C. Sun, and Z. Men, “Si quantum dots enhanced hydrogen bonds networks of liquid water in a stimulated Raman scattering process,” Opt. Lett. 44(14), 3450–3453 (2019). [CrossRef]  

19. V. R. Kumar and P. P. Kiran, “Onset of ice VII phase of liquid water: Role of filamentation in stimulated Raman scattering,” Opt. Lett. 40(12), 2802–2805 (2015). [CrossRef]  

20. Z. L. Li, H. D. Li, W. H. Fang, S. H. Wang, C. L. Sun, and Z. W. Men, “Pre-resonance-stimulated Raman scattering for water bilayer structure on laser-induced plasma bubble surface,” Opt. Lett. 40(14), 3253–3255 (2015). [CrossRef]  

21. F. Li, Y. Wang, Z. Li, C. Sun, and Z. Men, “Si quantum dots enhancement stimulated Raman scattering of water molecules,” J. Raman Spectrosc. 50(1), 85–90 (2019). [CrossRef]  

22. F. Li, Y. Wang, Z. Li, C. Sun, and Z. Men, “H2O2-induced hydrogen bond water networks enhanced on stimulated Raman scattering,” J. Raman Spectrosc. 50(12), 1890–1895 (2019). [CrossRef]  

23. H. Yui and T. Sawada, “Interaction of Excess Electrons with Water Molecules at the Early Stage of Laser-Induced Plasma Generation in Water,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(16), 3512–3515 (2000). [CrossRef]  

24. D. Liu, J. Shi, M. Ouyang, X. Chen, J. Liu, and X. He, “Pumping effect of stimulated Brillouin scattering on stimulated Raman scattering in water,” Phys. Rev. A 80(3), 033808 (2009). [CrossRef]  

25. G. E. Walrafen and L. A. Blatz, “Raman Spectral Studies of HTO in H2O,” J. Chem. Phys. 56(8), 4216–4222 (1972). [CrossRef]  

26. T. Li, F. Li, Z. Li, C. Sun, J. Tong, W. Fang, and Z. Men, “Influence of strong and weak hydrogen bonds in ices on stimulated Raman scattering,” Opt. Lett. 41(6), 1297–1300 (2016). [CrossRef]  

27. N. A. Chumaevskii, M. N. Rodnikova, and J. Barthel, “Some peculiarities of compounds with spatial H-bond network: H2O, H2O2, HOCH2CH2OH,” J. Mol. Liq. 115(2-3), 63–67 (2004). [CrossRef]  

28. N. A. Chumaevskii and M. N. Rodnikova, “Some peculiarities of liquid water structure,” J. Mol. Liq. 106(2-3), 167–177 (2003). [CrossRef]  

29. F. Weinhold, “Resonance character of hydrogen-bonding interactions in water and other H-bonded species,” Adv. Protein Chem. 72, 121–155 (2005). [CrossRef]  

30. F. Li, Y. Wang, Z. L. Li, Z. Men, and C. Sun, “Enhanced Stimulated Raman Scattering by a Pressure-Controlled Shock Wave in Liquid Water,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10(17), 4812–4816 (2019). [CrossRef]  

31. Y. Sun and C. Q. Sun, “The Soul of Water: Single Notion,” Multiple Myths. Springer-Verlag, Germany, 2016.

32. C. Q. Sun, X. Zhang, J. Zhou, Y. L. Huang, Y. C. Zhou, and W. T. Zheng, “Density and phonon-stiffness anomalies of water and ice in the full temperature range,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4(15), 2565–2570 (2013). [CrossRef]  

33. A. G. F. de Beer, R. K. Campen, and S. Roke, “Separating surface structure and surface charge with second-harmonic and sum-frequency scattering,” Phys. Rev. B 82(23), 235431 (2010). [CrossRef]  

34. R. Prince, R. Frontiera, and E. Potma, “Stimulated Raman scattering: from bulk to nano,” Chem. Rev. 117(7), 5070–5094 (2017). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup to measure SRS spectra. Insert: SRS spectra of liquid water.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. SRS spectra of liquid water and 1 M KOH-H2O solution in (a) forward direction and (b) backward direction.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The relationship between OH stretching vibration and hydrogen bonds energy. Purple: pure water. Light blue: KOH-H2O solution. The horizontal axis is attained from electronic structure calculations. The model used in calculation is Lewis structure mode [29].
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) Spontaneous Raman spectrum of ice Ih at 253 K; (b) FSRS spectrum of ice Ih.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Spontaneous Raman spectra of (a) KOH-H2O solution and (b) pure water. Peak fitting of the spectra was achieved by Origin software.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. (a) Schematic diagram of KOH dissolved in liquid water; (b) Cooperative relaxation of the segmented O:H-O bond in KOH-H2O solution. White ball: oxygen atom; red ball: hydrogen atom; blue ball: the nonbonding lone pair; and dotted line: the original position of the water. H atom is the reference origin. This is only a schematic diagram and does not represent the actual molecular size and number of binding molecules.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of stimulated Raman scattering.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparison of the Raman bands observed in pure water and KOH-H2O solution.

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

d w f i d ( w ) g ( δ w ) = Γ / π 2 ( δ w 2 ) + 2 Γ 2 1 Γ
P N L ( w 0 ) = P ( 2 ) ( w 0 ) + P ( 3 ) ( w 0 ) + ,
P ( 3 ) ( w s ) = 6 ε 0 χ ( 3 ) ( w s ; w p , w p , w s ) : E p E P E s
G s s χ ( 3 )
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.