1. Introduction

Thermal infrared cameras provide images at infrared wavelengths, typically in the long-wave infrared (LWIR) range of $8\mu m$ to $14\mu m$, thus allowing us to transcend the visible-spectrum limitation of human eyes [1]. The infrared cameras consist of an imaging system and infrared detectors of which there are two types, namely photon detectors [2–4] and thermal detectors [5,6]. The former rely on the conversion of incident IR photons to electrons by using low-bandgap semiconductor detectors which typically require low cryogenic temperatures. The latter rely on the conversion of incident IR photons to heat using microbolometer detector pixels. The converted heat results into small temperature variations which can then be measured to form an image. Such thermal detectors can operate at or near room temperature. Based on operating temperatures, photon detectors and thermal detectors are also called as cooled and uncooled IR detectors respectively. The advantages of thermal detectors over photon detectors are lower cost, smaller size, lighter weight, lower maintenance, longer lifetime, immediate power-up capability and reduced power consumption, while the disadvantages are lower sensitivity and intrinsically slower response speed (typical time constant of few $ms$). Despite some of these disadvantages, the thermal detectors and cameras are used for an increasing number of cost-sensitive applications that do not necessarily demand high performance and speeds of photon detectors [7,8]. Microbolometers are now produced in larger volumes than all other IR detector array technologies together [9].

In this work, we introduce a new nanophotonic detector in place of microbolometer to considerably simplify the overall architecture of the thermal IR imaging system, where ‘thermal’ indicates the underlying thermal detector as well as our focus on the detection of LWIR radiation generated thermally in the far-field. Our proposed design is schematically illustrated in the left panel of Fig. 1(a) along with the schematic design of the standard thermal IR imaging system in the right panel (with dimensions not to scale). In both cases, LWIR radiation from the far field is focused by an infrared-transparent lens onto the focal plane array (FPA) which consists of micron-size detector pixels suspended on top of a substrate and designed to be good LWIR absorbers. In the standard design based on bolometers, such a pixel contains a phase change material (e.g. vanadium oxide) having temperature-sensitive electrical resistivity. A bias current is passed through the pixel and the voltage difference across it is measured using a readout integrated circuit (ROIC). The IR-absorption-induced temperature change of the bolometer causes its resistivity to change (typically few $\%/K$). The resulting voltage change signals measured by ROIC are fed to A/D converters and after additional digital processing, final IR image is presented on a separate information display screen.

 

Fig. 1. (a) The proposed architecture is schematically shown in comparison to the standard thermal IR imaging system. The IR light from the far field is focused onto the array of detector pixels (also referred to as FPA) which are suspended on top of a substrate. The absorption of IR photons causes heating of these suspended detector pixels. In the standard design (right panel), the detector pixel is a bolometer whose resistivity changes sensitively with its temperature variation relative to the substrate. The resistivity change is measured using an electronic readout circuit (ROIC). After additional A/D conversion and image processing, the final IR image is presented on a separate display screen. We propose a new design (left panel) where the final IR image can be directly visualized via reflection of visible laser light illuminating the FPA. We realize this functionality by designing the detector in such a way that its reflectivity changes from low to high in response to IR-absorption-induced heating as illustrated in (b) so that cold and hot objects in the far field can be distinguished. In particular, our detector is a resonant waveguide grating structure illustrated by the right schematic in (b). Its underlying working principle is based on sensing small temperature changes of the detector pixel caused by thermo-optic effect. Diffractive optical waveguide is used to incouple visible light and illuminate the detector array as shown. The wavefront of the reflected light spatially modulated by the temperature map of the detector pixels carries the final IR image which can be directly viewed.

Download Full Size | PDF

Our design is motivated by the idea of directly visualizing the pixel temperature changes relative to the substrate by measuring the reflection of visible light. This will eliminate the need for A/D conversion, image processing, and a separate display screen (red box). In this architecture, visible light is projected onto the array of detector pixels using a diffractive optical waveguide which is used in augmented reality eye-wearables that overlay digital content on top of the real-world scene [10]. As illustrated in Fig. 1(b), the detector pixel is designed such that large temperature changes relative to the supporting substrate corresponding to hot objects in the far field lead to high reflectivity ($R \approx 1$) while small temperature changes corresponding to cold objects in the far field lead to low reflectivity ($R \approx 0$). The light reflected from the pixel array is spatially modulated by the map of the temperature changes of the detectors. The diffractive optical waveguide is usually designed with a small diffraction efficiency, such that the reflected light from the pixel array can transmit through the waveguide layer in the perpendicular direction. The resulting temperature map of few $mm^2$ spot size can be directly viewed through a suitable optical lens as shown in Fig. 1(a). While many parts of this optical architecture currently exist, the detector pixel for performing the intended functionality needs to be specially designed, and that is the focus of this work.

We note that optical measurement of thermal IR detector pixels has been explored previously in Refs. [11–17]. Moreover, Refs. [12] and [17] also show the use of charge-coupled device (CCD) imagers to form an image based on light reflected from the detector pixels. In contrast to these works, here we envision that the temperature map on the detector pixel array to be directly viewed by human eyes in order to further simplify the design of thermal imaging systems. For this purpose, we design the pixels to achieve low to high reflectivity change at visible illumination wavelength indicating high contrast between cold and hot objects in the far field as illustrated in Fig. 1(b). Our design utilizes resonant waveguide gratings [18,19] which are different in terms of both geometry and material options from all above-mentioned works [11–17] in the context of optical measurement of IR detectors.

The commercial uncooled thermal IR cameras, which have matured after many decades of research [9], primarily use bolometers with electronic ROIC measurements. Although comparable or better performance may be achieved, introducing optical measurement instead of electronic readout in this well-established technology is challenging unless there is a significant (order of magnitude) improvement in performance or a distinct technological advantage of doing so. Our work advances this line of research by bringing to attention the unique advantage of optical readout in enabling direct thermal IR vision with a carefully engineered system such that additional components for A/D conversion, image processing, and a separate information display are no longer required. Since electronic readout is fundamentally not sufficient for presenting the final IR image and these additional components are necessarily required for standard thermal IR cameras, the capability to realize direct thermal IR vision is in principle a distinct advantage of optical readout over electronic readout. Our nanophotonic design can potentially help to further advance the thermal IR imaging technology by reducing the form factor (size, weight), cost, and power consumption. It can pave the way for developing small-size, light-weight near-eye display device (to be mounted on a headset) which can potentially augment human vision with thermal infrared vision.

2. Nanophotonic detector array design

The proposed functionality illustrated in Fig. 1(b) requires each detector pixel to satisfy the following conditions. First, the pixel’s reflectivity $R$ at the visible illumination wavelength should change substantially with its temperature changes relative to the substrate. Moreover, it should change from low to high for increasing temperature differentials to indicate contrast between cold and hot objects in the far field. Second, the pixel should be a good absorber around the wavelength of $10\mu$m which corresponds to the peak wavelength of thermal radiation from near-room-temperature bodies. Third, the pixel should have good thermal isolation from its surroundings so that the absorbed thermal radiation can lead to a reasonable change in temperature, typically of the order of a few Kelvins compared to the substrate. Fourth, the thermal time constant of the pixel should be small so that the response speed to the temporal variation of the incident thermal radiation is fast. Since the third requirement above limits the thermal conductance of the pixel to the surrounding environment, the thermal mass of the pixel should be sufficiently small. For standard thermal IR cameras, the third requirement is addressed by the suspension of microbolometer pixels on top of a substrate inside vacuum packaging such that the heat exchange occurs primarily via conduction between the detector and the substrate. Additionally, radiation shields are used to prevent any unwanted IR radiation from the packaging which is unrelated to the far-field scene [20]. In the following, assuming the use of vacuum packaging and radiation shields, we describe our nanophotonic design that addresses the four requirements above for the pixel. We also analyze the effects of any spurious temperature drifts and potential fabrication nonuniformity within or across detector pixels on the device performance, and clarify the related requirements and calibration methods to tackle them.

Figure 2(a) illustrates the pixel design (dimensions not to scale). It consists of a multi-layered patterned slab depicted in the top inset consisting of layers of silicon nitride (Si$_3$N$_4$), silicon dioxide (SiO$_2$), silicon carbide (SiC) with patterning in the form of a two-dimensional lattice of cylinders as depicted in the bottom inset. This constitutes a detector pixel which is suspended on top of four insulating posts on a substrate. For calculations below, we assume substrate to be silica glass. The individual layer thicknesses and the lattice periods are mentioned in the schematic in Fig. 2(a). We assume that each pixel is $12\mu m$ $\times 12\mu m$ in lateral directions and separated by $1\mu m$ from the neighboring pixel. Such pixel dimensions are common in photon IR and thermal IR detectors with the latest research reporting pixel sizes down to $5\mu m$ [21]. Since refractive indices of SiC and Si$_3$N$_4$ are larger than that of SiO$_2$ at visible wavelengths, these layers support guided modes which can couple to normally incident light via periodic grating, resulting into sharp resonant features in reflection and transmission spectra [22–25]. Because the materials are low-loss and transparent in this wavelength range, it is possible to realize high quality factor ($Q \gtrsim 10^4$) resonances. In the literature, such guided mode resonance structures, also referred as resonant waveguide gratings (RWG) [18,19] or high contrast gratings with additional specification (use of high refractive index contrast) [26], have been well-studied and also used for sensing small changes in refractive index [27,28], and for making optial biosensor [29,30]. However, their use for the optical readout of IR detectors was not previously considered.

 

Fig. 2. (a) Design of suspended photonic detector pixel whose reflectivity is highly sensitive to its temperature change. (b) The reflectivity ($R$) and transmission ($T$) spectra at $T_b=300K$ and $T_b=305K$. The red arrow indicates the illumination wavelength where large reflectivity change can be obtained. (c) $R$ as a function of $T_b$ shows strong variation over the small temperature change arising from the absorption of incident IR light. The absorptivity $A$ is also plotted in the same range. (d) The IR absorption spectrum of the detector pixel shows broadband nature in the LWIR range of $8-14\mu m$.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 2(b) demonstrates the reflection (solid lines) and transmission (dashed lines) spectra for normal incidence of light around $\lambda = 550$nm and for two different detector temperatures $T_b=300$K and $T_b=305$K. The small temperature change induced by the absorbed thermal IR signals from the far-field causes a small change in the refractive index via thermo-optic effect. The thermo-optic coefficient of SiC given by $\frac {\partial n_{\text{SiC}}}{\partial T} = 5.8\times 10^{-5}/K.$ is much larger than the coefficients of SiO$_2$ and Si$_3$N$_4$ (of the order of $10^{-6}/K$) [31,32]. As shown in Fig. 2(b), the high $Q$-factor resonant dip in the reflection spectrum shifts noticeably toward larger wavelength upon increasing the pixel temperature. When this structure is illuminated by a laser source close to $\lambda =548$nm (green light), a large change in the reflectivity is observed as indicated by the red arrow. $R\approx 10^{-3}$ at $T_b=300K$ changes to $R\approx 1$ at $T_b=305K$. The temperature dependence of the reflectivity $R$ is demonstrated in Fig. 2(c) assuming normal incidence of monochromatic laser light at $548$nm. The plot indicates that the reflectivity $R$ increases monotonically as the temperature $T_b$ increases from $299.1K$ up to $302K$. Thus, if the substrate temperature is fixed at $T_s=299.1K$, this specific example system with illumination at $548$nm can be used to sense the differentials of $(T_b-T_s)$ induced by IR absorption. Although we fixed $T_s$ and illumination wavelength for explaining this underlying mechanism, we explain further below that the illumination wavelength can be readily tuned in real time by sensing the substrate temperature such that $R \approx 0$ in the absence of any incident thermal IR signals. We also note that the laser illumination can cause the detector pixel to heat up depending on illumination intensity, pixel area and pixel absorptivity. The proposed structure exhibits low absorptivity ($A\approx 10^{-2}$) as shown by the red curve in Fig. 2(c). For our specific design, we show below that the heating induced by the laser for typical illumination intensity appropriate for human vision is much smaller than the typical absorbed thermal IR power because of this low absorptivity.

We now discuss the details of our design related to the problem of IR detection. The thicknesses and lattice periods in the proposed design are obtained using optimization informed by the physics of RWG structures as described in the appendix. The example system discussed above is by no means unique, and many solutions at various visible wavelengths can be readily obtained for different geometric parameters (thicknesses and lattice periods) using the same material layers. We also note that this optimization is performed with respect to the optical readout and not with respect to thermal IR absorption. Nonetheless, the proposed pixel structure is already a reasonably good absorber of thermal radiation as shown in Fig. 2(d) which is ensured by the specific choice of materials. In particular, the material choice in our design is governed by the fulfillment of two conditions, namely good infrared photon absorption in $8-14\mu m$ range for LWIR detection and low-loss transparent nature at visible wavelengths ($\sim 300-700 nm$) for realizing high $Q$-resonance to detect small changes in pixel temperature. In microbolometers used in standard thermal IR detectors, Si$_3$N$_4$ is already used because of its broadband LWIR absorption. While SiC and SiO$_2$ also lead to resonant absorption in $8-12\mu$m due to their optical phonon polaritons, the resulting absorption spectrum is rather narrowband. Therefore, addition of Si$_3$N$_4$ layer in the present design helps enhance and broaden the LWIR absorption. In standard microbolometers, phase-transition materials such as vanadium oxide (VO$_x$) and amorphous silicon (aSi) which exhibit large thermal coefficient of resistance (TCR) of few $\%/K$ are typically used. While the same materials also exhibit large thermo-optic effect, they are quite lossy at visible wavelengths. Therefore, these materials as well as metals and metal oxides cannot be used for the intended detector pixel design.

Below, we quantitatively describe the thermal aspects of our nanophotonic design. The temperature of the detector pixel follows the heat equation:

Figure 3(a) depicts the change in the reflectivity for the specific example system analyzed above as a function of absorbed thermal IR power. We assume that the intensity of incident visible light coming from the diffractive optical waveguide is around $2W/m^2$ (approximately $800Cd/m^2$ (nits) similar to the brightness levels of displays like computer monitors). Because of small absorptivity $A \sim 0.01$ of the pixels of area $A_p=144 \mu m^2$, the absorbed optical power is $3pW$ which is much smaller than the typical values of absorbed thermal IR power. The heating due to thermal IR absorption leads to small changes in the detector temperature ($T_b$) which is demonstrated in Fig. 3(b). Accordingly, the reflectivity is changed leading to strong reflection corresponding to LWIR radiation coming from hot objects in the far field. We note that the reflectivity changes over wider temperature ranges of $T_b$ can also be engineered with different optimized nanophotonic design. The possible temperature swing of the detector pixel primarily depends on the thermal conductance $G$ and the maximum absorbed thermal IR power by the relation $\Delta T_b = \text {max}\{P_t\}/G$. These parameters can be estimated in separate experiments and the design can be iterated to realize optimized performance.

 

Fig. 3. (a) For a fixed substrate temperature $T_s$ and illumination wavelength, the reflectivity $R$ increases monotonically with increasing absorbed thermal IR power. The underlying increase in the detector pixel temperature $T_b$ is shown in (b). These changes are obtained by solving Eq. (1) in the main text.

Download Full Size | PDF

We note that the pixel uniformity across all pixels is important for recreating reliable final IR image of the far-field scene. Because the proposed detector uses high $Q$ resonance for refractive index sensing, it will also respond sensitively to design perturbations. For a fabricated device, each nanocylinder usually has local imperfections such as small bumps or small variations in the height or the diameter. Such local imperfections are randomly distributed across all detector pixels. The reflection from a single detector pixel containing a lattice of these cylinders averages out the impact of these local imperfections on the overall response of that detector pixel to the light. While such local imperfections of a single detector pixel can be ignored, it is conceivable that averaged geometric parameters for different detector pixels in the array may have small variation. For example, Fig. 4(a) demonstrates the reflectivity dependence on $P_t$ by introducing small perturbation $\Delta t_g$ in the grating thickness of the detector. We assume that the lattice periods are accurate and match for all detector pixels which is usually the case for standard lithography techniques. As evident from the figure, the nanometric mismatch between averaged structural parameters of distinct detector pixels can lead to small mismatch in their reflectivity response for small values of $R$. In order to capture the performance of the detector array under such non-idealistic conditions, we assume a zero-mean Gaussian-distributed error of standard deviation $\sigma$ in the grating thickness and plot the averaged reflectivity representative of the response of the detector array in Fig. 4(b). At small values of $P_t$, the averaged reflectivity at $\sigma \approx 2nm$ deviates from the averaged reflectivity for the design with small values of $\sigma \approx 0.1nm$. Consequently, the contrast defined as $C_R = (I_{\text {max}}-I_{\text {min}})/(I_{\text {max}}+I_{\text {min}})$ reduces as the averaged reflectivity at $P_t=0$ increases. For instance, $C_R(\sigma = 0.5nm) = 0.99$ reduces to $C_R(\sigma = 2nm)=0.92$. Similar sensitivity dependence is numerically observed (but not demonstrated here) for a perturbation in the diameter of the cylindrical grating structure. This sensitivity analysis provides useful approximate fabrication requirements. For example, for the detector FPA of $1024 \times 1024$ pixels, fabrication mismatch of few $nm$ standard deviation between distinct detector pixels over $\sim mm^2$ area of the detector array is sufficient and acceptable. The advances in lithography techniques such as nanoimprint lithography have enabled low-cost fabrication of large-area patterned surfaces [37]. In a separate work [38], subnanometer precision in terms of surface roughness of approximately $0.15nm$ has also been realized for SiC on insulator surfaces. Therefore, we believe that fabrication requirements for the proposed detector array can be ensured using state-of-the-art lithography techniques. We also note that the resonant mode being used for IR detection resides inside the suspended grating structure. Since it is spatially far removed from the substrate, the substrate nonuniformities (already present or due to real-time thermal expansion effects) do not influence the optical performance of the detector pixel. Thermal expansion effects of the detector pixel are negligible compared to the nanometric perturbations considered above. For example, considering the largest thermal expansion coefficient of $\alpha _L = 3.2\times 10^{-6} K^{-1}$, the SiC layer of thickness $t_L = 264nm$ approximately changes by $\Delta L = \alpha _L t_L \Delta T_b \approx 0.004nm$ which is quite small compared to perturbations considered above.

 

Fig. 4. (a) Reflectivity variation is plotted by introducing perturbation in the grating height ($\Delta t_g$). (b) Since the fabricated design will have nonuniformities related to etching and patterning, we assume a random Gaussian perturbation of zero mean and standard deviation $\sigma$ in the grating height of the detector pixel. The averaged reflectivity plotted in the figure for $\sigma =2 nm$ indicates the monotonic increase of $R$ for all pixels which is sufficient for producing a reliable IR image using the detector array. (c) Reflectivity variation is plotted by introducing variation in the substrate temperature denoted as $\Delta T_s$. Large deviation for small $\Delta T_s=0.5K$ indicates the requirement of either $T_s$ stabilization or wavelength calibration. (d) Contour plot of reflectivity as function of wavelength and $T_s$ reveals the resonant dips (red) corresponding to the condition $R \approx 0$. By calibrating the operating wavelength to approximately follow this condition based on real-time measurement of $T_s$, significant variations due to temperature drifts can be avoided.

Download Full Size | PDF

In the design of microbolometer IR detectors, significant importance is given to drifts or small changes in the substrate temperature ($T_s$). The detector is designed to be highly sensitive to $T_b$ which depends on the absorbed IR power and the substrate temperature $T_s$. Variation in $T_s$ causes an equal variation in $T_b$, and this becomes a major source of unwanted signal which is unrelated to IR signals coming from the far field. Various calibration or compensation approaches are used in standard microbolometer IR detectors to tackle this important issue [39,40]. The same holds true for the proposed design. For instance, Fig. 4(c) demonstrates the reflectivity dependence on $P_t$ for small variations in the substrate temperature ($\Delta T_s$) for fixed illumination wavelength. Evidently, the deviation in $R$ is quite large for small $\Delta T_s \sim 0.5K$. This problem can be solved by tuning the illumination wavelength in real time based on prior measurements of reflectivity for different values of $T_s$. The contour plot in Fig. 4(d) illustrates that the illumination wavelength which should coincide with the resonant dip ($R \lesssim 10^{-3}$) in the reflectivity spectrum increases linearly with $T_s$. Such linear tunability can be achieved with on-chip microheaters with integrated tunable visible laser sources [41–43]. While our proposed architecture does not involve electronic readout and digital processing, it will require a thermocouple to measure $T_s$ and a controller system to tune the illumination wavelength in a predetermined manner in real time. An alternative to such a controller system can be temperature stabilization using small Peltier elements used in some versions of thermal IR cameras. On-chip device temperatures can be stabilized within few $mK$ temperature variations [17] and the operating wavelength can be fixed to coincide with the resonant dip in the reflectivity spectrum. We note that the fabrication nonuniformity and the temperature drifts can also be mitigated by using illumination light of bandwidth comparable or close to the bandwidth of the resonant dip in the reflection spectrum instead of using monochromatic light [30,44]. Since the response is integrated (or averaged) over a bandwidth of wavelengths, the sensitivity to unwanted design perturbations is reduced. We note that our work focusses primarily on the design of the detector array. For developing a proof-of-concept monocular thermal IR vision system, additional components such as vacuum packaging, radiation shields and optical lenses are also required. However the same components used for traditional IR cameras using microbolometer FPAs [20] can be directly used. While we do not discuss in detail these additional system components, we briefly estimate one important aspect concerning the direct IR vision namely angular field of view which also depends on the IR lens being used. Assuming the detector FPA of $1024 \times 1024$ pixels of size $12\mu m \times 12 \mu m.$ and inter-pixel spacing of $1\mu$m., the overall detector array size is $\approx 13.3 mm \times 13.3 mm$. Assuming an IR lens of focal length $9mm$ (typical for small form-factor IR cameras), the angular field of view for thermal IR vision is approximately $73^{\circ } (H) \times 73^{\circ } (V)$. The resulting two-dimensional image of the far-field scene can be readily observed over approximately the same area of the device which can be either held or mounted on a headset at a suitable eye-relief distance.

3. Conclusion

We introduced a new nanophotonic detector array in place of traditional microbolometer as a potential minimalist approach to enable direct thermal IR vision. Our proposed design produces an IR image as spatially modulated wavefront of visible light reflected by the detector array which can be directly viewed by the human eye. This design eliminates the need for additional components for electronic readout, A/D conversion, image processing and information display, otherwise necessary in standard thermal IR cameras. The proposed design can be useful for achieving the same functionality as IR cameras potentially at reduced cost, form factor and power consumption. We note that additional post-processing of electronic or optical readout signals from the detector pixels based on radiometry is necessary to provide quantitative estimates (in numbers) of temperatures of far-field objects. However, the focus of our present work is to provide a direct IR image to the human eye and not the temperatures of far-field objects (in numbers). Nonetheless, there are many use cases where the proposed minimalist approach can be potentially employed. For many practical applications of IR cameras such as inspection and detection in industrial, infrastructure, agriculture, healthcare settings, night vision or low-light vision for military, fire-fighters, camping enthusiasts, the objective of the device is often to provide an IR image to the human eye. In some of these use cases, the final human evaluation is often based on the IR image, thus requiring strong contrast and good quality of the IR image. Therefore, we believe that the proposed minimalist approach can be practically useful and can be advantageous in terms of cost, form factor and power consumption as noted above.

We also note that optical readout of microbolometers has been explored in research, but it has never been used in commercialized uncooled IR cameras. Significant performance improvement or distinct advantage over already well-developed electronic-readout-based approach is necessary to justify further research and development based on optical approach. Our approach of using nanophotonic detector array essentially emphasizes this selective advantage of optical readout over electronic readout in terms of enabling direct (without using a separate information display) thermal IR vision, which is fundamentally not possible with electronic readout. We further point out that diffractive optical waveguide, a crucial component of our design, is currently highly sought-after technology for developing small form-factor augmented reality displays. In other words, our work makes a new connection and showcases unexpected technology potential of diffractive optics waveguides for the topic of IR detection.

IR detection and sensing is important and active research area. In the near future, apart from an actual experimental implementation of the proposed idea, there are also other aspects which can be extended. For instance, all components used in the design are transparent at visible wavelengths. If the optical lenses are optimized simultaneously for visible and infrared wavelengths to reduce chromatic aberration, it is conceivable that the final image will contain IR image at the specific laser illumination wavelength overlaid on top of the visible image. Such augmented thermal vision functionality with frugal resources can be an interesting new technology. The underlying detector concept can be viewed as an infrared upconverter of which there are many other examples based on different working principles. A detailed investigation of advantages and disadvantages of using the proposed approach as infrared upconverter can be carried out in a separate future work. One can also design multi-spectral IR imaging where different IR wavelengths are mapped to different visible wavelengths using multiple optimized pixels. For example, two types of detector pixels can be designed to potentially map SWIR ($3-8\mu m$) light to green light and LWIR ($8-14\mu m$) light to red light. We believe that our work paves the way for developing such novel IR imaging capabilities in the future.