Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Frequency tunable single photon diode based on giant atom coupling to a waveguide

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

The single photon scattering properties in a waveguide coupling to a giant atom with a three-level system are investigated theoretically. One of the transitions of the giant atom couples to the waveguide at two points while the other one is driven by a classical field. Using the analytical expressions of the single photon scattering amplitudes, the conditions for realizing perfect single photon nonreciprocal scattering are discussed in both Markovian regime and non-Markovian regime. In the Markovian regime, the perfect non-reciprocity can be realized by adjusting the external classical field, the energy dissipation of the giant atom, the phase difference between the two coupling strengths and the accumulated phase resulting from the photon propagating between the two coupling points. In the non-Markovian regime, the non-reciprocal scattering phenomenon becomes more abundant due to the time delay. However, the analytical results show that the perfect non-reciprocity can still be achieved. When the incident photon is resonant with the giant atom, the nonreciprocity can be switched by controlling the classical field. For the non-resonant single photon, one can adjust the Rabi frequency of the classical field to obtain the perfect non-reciprocal single photon transmission. Our work provides a manner to realize a frequency tunable single photon diode.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

On-chip optical nonreciprocal propagation in one-dimensional waveguide has attracted much attention in recent years due to its potential applications in quantum communications and quantum computations [110]. Due to the fast developments of waveguide quantum electrodynamics, the nonreciprocal single photon scattering in waveguide coupled directly to atoms or indirectly interacting with atoms mediated by resonators have been studied widely. Hafezi and Rabl firstly proposed an approach for on-chip optical non-reciprocity at the single-photon level by using strong optomechanical interaction in micro-ring resonators in 2012 [1]. After that, Xia et al. proposed a reversible nonmagnetic single-photon isolation using unbalanced quantum coupling in 2014 [4]. Their proposal was demonstrated by Scheucher et al. in 2016 [11]. Chiral atom-photon interactions in waveguide [1215], which means the interaction strength between the atom and photon depends on the propagation direction of the photon, is considered as an important method to realize the single photon non-reciprocal propagation [1628]. Controlling the phase differences between the coupling strengths is also a possible method to exhibit incident direction-dependent single photon scattering [2931]. Concurrently, the optical non-reciprocity can be also achieved via diverse mechanisms such as introducing the non-Hermiticity [3234] and dynamical modulations [35].

In traditional waveguide electrodynamics, the wavelength of light in waveguide is much larger than the size of atoms. So the atoms can be regarded as point-like objects and the dipole approximation can be used to deal with the interactions between them [36]. However, recent reports show that in some systems, such as superconducting qubits coupling to surface acoustic waves or microwave waveguide and ferro-magnetic spin ensemble interacting with meandering waveguide [3740], the coupling points are multiple and thus the dipole approximation is broken. Quantum interference will take place due to the multiple coupling which can provide a new path for the interaction between the photon and the emitter. In fact, the quantum interference effect can also be generated in small atom systems due to coherent feedback loops generated by different waveguide coupling model structures [41,42]. In the giant atom system, the quantum interference effect can contribute to many interesting quantum optical phenomena, such as frequency-dependent Lamb shifts and relaxation rates [43], decoherence-free interaction [4447], collective radiation [48], nonexponential decay [38,49] and bound states [5053]. The entanglement generation [5456] and disentanglement dynamics [57] in the giant atom-waveguide system have also been explored.

The single photon scattering properties in one-dimensional waveguide coupling to giant atoms are also investigated [5863]. The quantum interference induced by multiple-point coupling plays important roles in controlling single photon scattering properties. Some important quantum devices at single-photon level, such as frequency converter, router have been proposed [6466]. Recently, Chen et al. investigated nonreciprocal and chiral single-photon scattering for giant atoms [58]. In their model, the coupling phase between the giant atom and the waveguide are different. Together with dissipation, the nonreciprocal single photon scattering can be realized. Their model can work for the photon with fixed frequency. Here, we further study the single photon scattering properties in the waveguide coupling with a giant atom. The giant atom is a $\Lambda$ system with one transition driven by a classical field. We discuss how to control the single photon scattering properties in this system by the classical field. The time delay due to the size of the giant atom may play important roles in quantum devices based on giant atom, which may result in many interesting non-Markovian effects. We investigate detailedly the non-reciprocity of single photon propagation in the non-Markovian regime. Our results are helpful in designing nonreciprocal devices at single-photon level based on giant atom.

2. Configuration and theoretical model

The model we considered is shown in Fig. 1. A giant atom couples to a waveguide at $x_{1}=0$ and $x_{2}=d$. The giant atom is a three-level system with ground state $|g\rangle$, excited state $|e\rangle$, and metastable state $|s\rangle$. The transition between $|g\rangle$ and $|e\rangle$ is coupled by the modes of the waveguide with coupling strengths $g_{1}$ at $x=x_{1}$ and $g_{2}$ at $x=x_{2}$. The transition between $|e\rangle$ and $|s\rangle$ is decoupled from the waveguide but driven by a classical filed with Rabi frequency $\Omega$. In our previous studies [59], we considered that the coupling between the giant atom and waveguide is chiral, which means that the coupling strength between the giant atom and the photon depends on the propagation direction of the photon. In this paper, instead, we consider that the coupling is non-chiral but $g_{1}$ and $g_{2}$ are complex numbers, which can be given as $g_{1}=ge^{i\theta _{1}}$ and $g_{2}=ge^{i\theta _{2}}$ [58]. Here, $g$ is a real number.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. A three-level giant atom coupled to the waveguide, where the coupling points at $x=0$ and $x=d$. $ge^{i\theta _{1}}$ and $ge^{i\theta _{2}}$ are the coupling strength, $|g\rangle$ represents the ground state, $|e\rangle$ and $|s\rangle$ represents different excited states. $\gamma _{e}(\gamma _{s})$ represents the energy loss of state $|e\rangle (|s\rangle )$. The transition $|e\rangle \leftrightarrow |s\rangle$ is driven by a classical laser beam with Rabi frequency $\Omega$.

Download Full Size | PDF

The system can be modeled by the Hamiltonian

$$H=H_{a}+H_{w}+H_{int},$$
where $H_{a}$, $H_{w}$ and $H_{int}$ respectively describe the giant atom, waveguide modes, and the interaction between them. Using rotation wave approximation, the Hamiltonian of the giant atom reads ($\hbar =1$)
$$H_{a}=(\omega_{e}-i\frac{\gamma_{e}}{2})\sigma_{ee}+(\omega_{e}-i\frac{\gamma_{s}}{2})\sigma_{ss}+\frac{\Omega}{2}(\sigma_{es}+\sigma_{se}),$$
where $\omega _{e}$ is the resonance frequency of the transition between $|e\rangle$ and $|g\rangle$. $\gamma _{e}$ denotes the energy loss rate from the excited state $|e\rangle$ to the non-waveguide mode. $\gamma _{s}$ is the decay rate from the metastable state $|s\rangle$. $\sigma _{p,q} (p,q=e,s,g)$ represents the dipole transition operator between the state $|p\rangle$ and $|q\rangle$. Assuming the waveguide mode be linear, i.e. $\omega =\omega _{0}+kv_{g}$, where $\omega _{0}$ is the reference frequency near the transition between $|e\rangle$ and $|g\rangle$. $k$ and $v_{g}$ are the wave vector and group velocity, respectively. In the real space, $H_{w}$ and $H_{int}$ can be given as [67,68]
$$H_{w}={-}iv_{g}\int dxc^{\dagger}_{R}(x)\frac{\partial}{\partial x}c_{R}(x)+iv_{g}\int dxc^{\dagger}_{L}(x)\frac{\partial}{\partial x}c_{L}(x),$$
$$H_{int}=\sum_{j=1,2} \int\delta(x-x_{j})g_{j}[c^{\dagger}_{R}(x)\sigma_{ge}+c^{\dagger}_{L}(x)\sigma_{ge}]+\text{H.c.}$$
$c^{\dagger }_{R}(x)$ ($c^{\dagger }_{L}(x))$ represents the creation operator for a right(left)-propagation photon at position $x$. $\delta (x)$ is the Dirac delta function. H.c. represents Hermitian conjugation.

Since we only consider the single photon scattering and the excitation number is conserved, the wavefunction of the system is given as

$$|\Psi\rangle=\int dx[u_{R}(x)c^{\dagger}_{R}(x)+u_{L}(x)c^{\dagger}_{L}(x)]|0,v\rangle+u_{e}|0,e\rangle+u_{s}|0,s\rangle,$$
where $|0,m\rangle (m=e,g,s)$ denotes no photon in the system and the giant atom is in the state $|m\rangle$. $u_{e}$ and $u_{s}$ are the corresponding probability amplitudes. $u_{R}(x)$ and $u_{L}(x)$ denote the single photon wave function of the right (left)-propagation in the waveguide. From the eigenvalue equation $H|\Psi \rangle =\omega |\Psi \rangle$, one can obtain the following set of equations of motion
$$\omega u_{R}(x)={-}iv_{g}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}u_{R}(x)+ge^{i\theta_{1}}\delta(x)u_{e}+ge^{i\theta_{2}}\delta(x-d)u_{e},$$
$$\omega u_{L}(x)=iv_{g}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}u_{L}(x)+ge^{i\theta_{1}}\delta(x)u_{e}+ge^{i\theta_{2}}\delta(x-d)u_{e},$$
$$\omega u_{e}=ge^{{-}i\theta_{1}}[u_{L}(0)+u_{R}(0)]+ge^{{-}i\theta_{2}}[u_{L}(d)+u_{R}(d)]+(\omega_{e}-i\frac{\gamma_{e}}{2})u_{e}+\frac{\Omega}{2}u_{s},$$
$$\omega u_{s}=(\omega_{e}-i\frac{\gamma_{s}}{2})u_{s}+\frac{\Omega}{2}u_{s}.$$

For any given initial state $|\Psi \rangle$, the dynamics of the system can be obtained straight forwardly by numerically integrating the set of above equations. In this work, our target is to solve for the single photon transmission and reflection probability amplitudes. For this purpose, supposing at the initial moment, the single photon incident from the left of the waveguide, then $u_{R}(x)$ and $u_{L}(x)$ can be written as

$$u_{R}(x)=e^{ikx}[h({-}x)+ah({-}x)h(d-x)+t_{l}h(x-d)],$$
$$u_{L}(x)=e^{{-}ikx}[r_{l}h({-}x)+bh({-}x)h(d-x)].$$

Here, $t_{l}$ and $r_{l}$, respectively, denote the single photon transmission and reflection amplitudes when the photon incidents from the left of the waveguide. $h(x)$ is the Heaviside step function with $h(0)=1/2$. $ae^{ikx}h(x)h(d-x)$ and $be^{-ikx}h(x)h(d-x)$ describe the wavefunction of the single photon between 0 and $d$. Substituting Eqs. (10) and (11) into Eqs. (69), one can obtain that

$$t_{l}=\frac{\Delta_{e}+D(\omega)-2\Gamma e^{i\Delta\theta}\sin\varphi}{\Delta_{e}+D(\omega)+2i\Gamma(1+e^{i\varphi}\cos\Delta\theta)},$$
$$r_{l}=\frac{2i\Gamma e^{i\varphi}(\cos\Delta\theta+\cos\varphi)}{\Delta_{e}+D(\omega)+2i\Gamma(1+e^{i\varphi}\cos\Delta\theta)},$$
where $D(\omega )=i\gamma _{e}/2-\Omega ^{2}/[4(\omega -\omega _{e})]$. $\Delta _{e}=\omega -\omega _{e}$ is the frequency detuning between the incident photon and the atomic transition frequency. $\Gamma =g^{2}/v_{g}$ denotes the rate of the atomic emission into the waveguide. $\Delta \theta =\theta _{2}-\theta _{1}$ is the phase difference between the two coupling points. The accumulated phase due to the photon propagation between the two coupling points is $\varphi =kd=\tau (\omega _{e}-\omega _{0}+\Delta _{e})=\varphi _{0}+\tau \Delta _{e}$, where time delay $\tau =d/v_{g}$ and $\varphi _{0}=\tau (\omega _{e}-\omega _{0})$. In the above calculations, we have set $\gamma _{s}=0$ since $|s\rangle$ is the metastable state.

For the single photon incident from the right of the waveguide, the propagation process is equivalent to the case that the left-incident one with exchanging the positions of two coupling points. Thus, one can get the transmission and reflection amplitudes for the right-incident photon as following:

$$t_{r}=\frac{\Delta_{e}+D(\omega)-2\Gamma e^{{-}i\Delta\theta}\sin\varphi}{\Delta_{e}+D(\omega)+2i\Gamma(1+e^{i\varphi}\cos\Delta\theta)},$$
$$r_{r}=\frac{2i\Gamma e^{{-}i\varphi}(\cos\Delta\theta+\cos\varphi)}{\Delta_{e}+D(\omega)+2i\Gamma(1+e^{i\varphi}\cos\Delta\theta)},$$

It shows that $t_{r}\neq t_{l}$, which indicates that the nonreciprocal single photon scattering properties can be obtained in this system. And this property is mainly due to the broken time-reversal symmetry. In detail, when the photon input from the left-side, the coupling phase difference $\Delta \theta =\theta _{2}-\theta _{1}$ generated by different coupling points. Nevertheless, for the single photon incident from the right of the waveguide, one can find that the coupling phase factors are exchanged by comparing Eq. (12) and Eq. (14), i.e. $\Delta \theta \to -\Delta \theta$, which means that the broken time-reversal symmetry is realized.

In our previous studies, the delay time $\tau$ is always neglected, which means that only the Markovian regime is considered [59,60]. However, if $\tau$ is large, $\varphi$ is sensitive to the detuning $\Delta _{e}$, which results in non-Markovian features in the transmission and reflection spectra. In the following, we will discuss the frequency tunable single photon nonreciprocal transmission in the Markovian and non-Markovian regime, respectively.

3. Frequency tunable nonreciprocal transmissions in the Markovian regime

In this section, we consider the case with $\varphi \approx \varphi _{0}$. It is worth mentioning that when the classical field is turned off, i.e. $\Omega =0$, the transmission and reflection amplitudes are the same as those reported in Ref. [58]. $T_{j}=|t_{j}|^2$ and $R_{j}=|r_{j}|^2(j=L,R)$ are introduced to represent the transmission and reflection probabilities. In particular, we find that although photons are incident from different sides of the waveguide, reflection probabilities are identical, even if there is the slightest difference in the numerator by comparing Eq. (13) and Eq. (15). To show the nonreciprocity more clearly, $\Delta T=|T_{R}-T_{L}|$ is introduced as the nonreciprocal degree. When $\Delta T=0$, which means $T_{R}=T_{L}$, the transmission is reciprocal. When $\Delta T=1$, the system shows perfect non-reciprocity. After corresponding calculations, one can obtain

$$\Delta T=\frac{4\gamma_{e}\Gamma|\sin\Delta\theta \sin\varphi_{0}|}{[\Delta_{e}-\frac{\Omega^2}{4\Delta_{e}}-2\Gamma\sin\varphi_{0}\cos\Delta\theta]^{2}+[\frac{\gamma_{e}}{2}+2\Gamma(1+\cos\varphi_{0}\cos\Delta\theta)]^{2}}.$$

The above equation shows that $\Delta T$ is strongly dependent on Rabi frequency, phase factors, and frequency detuning. By analyzing the Eq. (16), one can get $\Delta T=1$ when

$$\Delta_{e}=2\Gamma\sin\varphi_{0}\cos\Delta\theta+\Omega^2/4\Delta_{e},$$
$$4\gamma_{e}\Gamma|\sin\Delta\theta\sin\varphi_{0}|=[\gamma_{e}/2+2\Gamma(1+\cos\varphi_{0}\cos\Delta\theta)]^{2}.$$

We first investigate the effect of phase factors on nonreciprocal scattering properties with a certain intensity of the classical field, as depicted in Fig. 2(a) and (b). It can be seen clearly that the nonreciprocal phenomenon is mainly manifested in the two regions that are symmetric about $\Delta _{e}=0$. In detail, Fig. 2(a) shows the effect of $\varphi _{0}$ on $\Delta T$ with $\Delta \theta =\pi /2$, $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$ and $\Omega =8\Gamma$. When the incident photon frequency is in resonance with the atomic energy transition frequency, i.e. $\Delta _{e}=0$, the transmission probability can reach the maximum value 1. The photon incident from both sides of the waveguide is completely transmitted, which means that the giant atom is decoupled from the waveguide, this is similar to the traditional electromagnetically induced transparency phenomenon [6972]. The nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ decreases to 0, which is quite different from what happens with two-level giant atom [58]. When $\varphi _{0}=n\pi /2(n=1,3,5\cdots )$ and $\Delta _{e}=\pm 4\Gamma$, for the photon incident from the left of the waveguide, the system shows perfect absorption since $T_{L}=R_{L}=0$. The energy of the incident photon is absorbed by the giant atom and then emits it to the non-waveguide modes. The photon incident from the right-side of the waveguide is completely transmitted and $\Delta T$ reaches the maximum value $\Delta T=1$. When the frequency of the incident photon is far away from the resonance frequency, the nonreciprocal transmission disappears. Fig. 2(c) illustrates the above phenomenon more directly. $\Delta T$ is exhibited by the red dashed lines. In particular, when $\varphi _{0}=n\pi$, $\Delta T=0$, which means the transmission probability $T_{L}=T_{R}$, but not equal to 1. $T_{L}$ and $T_{R}$ can be written as $T_{L}=T_{R}=[(\Delta _{e}-16\Gamma ^2/\Delta _{e})^2+4\Gamma ^2]/[(\Delta _{e}-16\Gamma ^2/\Delta _{e})^2+16\Gamma ^2]$. The reflection probabilities $R_{L}=R_{R}=4\Gamma ^2/[(\Delta _{e}-16\Gamma ^2/\Delta _{e})^2+16\Gamma ^2]$. It can be found that $T_{L(R)}+R_{L(R)}\neq 1$ due to the dissipation effect. Furthermore, Fig. 2(b) depicts the effect of $\Delta \theta$ on nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$. Similarly, when the detuning $\Delta _{e}=0$ and $\Delta \theta =n\pi (n=0,1,2\cdots )$, the nonreciprocal transmission phenomenon also disappears. When the Rabi frequency of the classical field and resonance frequency satisfy the relation $\Delta _{e}=\pm \Omega /2$ and $\Delta \theta =n\pi /2(n=1,3,5\cdots )$, as we mentioned above, $\Delta T$ increases to 1. The perfect nonreciprocal transmission is realized.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. The effect of phase factors on $\Delta T$ with a certainly Rabi frequency $\Omega$. (a) shows the influence of phase accumulation $\varphi _{0}$ on $\Delta T$ with $\Delta \theta =\pi /2$, $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$ and $\Omega =8\Gamma$; (b) shows the influence of coupling phase difference $\Delta \theta$ on $\Delta T$ with $\varphi =\pi /2$, $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$ and $\Omega =8\Gamma$; (c) The transmission probability and the nonreciprocal degree as a function of $\Delta _{e}$, the other parameters are shown in the figure; (d) shows the influence of dissipation $\gamma _{e}$ on $\Delta T$ with $\Delta \theta =\varphi _{0}=\pi /2$ and $\Omega =8\Gamma$.

Download Full Size | PDF

From Eq. (16), one can find that the dissipation of the giant atom plays important roles in realization the nonreciprocal single photon transmission. Fig. 2(d) shows the effect of dissipation and detuning on nonreciprocity with $\Delta \theta =\varphi _{0}=\pi /2$ and $\Omega =8\Gamma$. Eq. (16 can be written as $\Delta T=4\gamma _{e}\Gamma /[(\Delta _{e}-16\Gamma ^2/\Delta _{e})^2+(\gamma _{e}/2+2\Gamma )^2]$. When $\Delta _{e}=0$, the nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T=0$ over the whole range of $\gamma _{e}$ and the transmission probability $T_{L}=T_{R}=1$ even though the dissipation exists. It’s worth noting that when the system is in an ideal environment, i.e. dissipation $\gamma _{e}=0$, the nonreciprocal transmission will also disappear, $\Delta T=0$. This phenomenon can be explained as follows. Physically, when $\gamma _{e}\neq 0$ ($\gamma _{e}=0$), the giant atom can be treated as a non-Hermitian (Hermitian) scattering center. When $\gamma _{e}\neq 0$ and $\Delta \theta \neq n\pi$, the nonreciprocal scattering can be achieved, and the nonreciprocal scattering process of this system results from the combination of the non-Hermiticity and the broken time-reversal symmetry [58]. When $\Delta _{e}=\pm 4\Gamma$ and $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$, $\Delta T$ reaches the maximum value $\Delta T=1$. As the dissipation increases, the nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ decreases to 0 gradually.

In the following, we discuss how to manipulate the nonreciprocal single photon scattering properties by the classical field. To study the effect of Rabi frequency on nonreciprocal scattering more clearly, we assume that $\varphi _{0}=\Delta \theta =\pi /2$ and $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$. Then Eq. (16) can be reduced as

$$\Delta T=\frac{16\Gamma^2}{(\Delta_{e}-\Omega^2/4\Delta_{e})^2+16\Gamma^2}.$$

Figure 3(a) exhibits the effect of Rabi frequency and detuning on $\Delta T$. When $\Delta _{e}=0$, the nonreciprocal transmission does not exist. However, the perfect nonreciprocal transmission can be achieved in the vicinity of the single photon resonance frequency. Fig. 3(b) shows the partial value interception of Fig. 3(a). When the Rabi frequency $\Omega =0$, the three-level system degenerates to a two-level system and the nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ shows the standard Lorentzian linear distribution. With the increasing Rabi frequency, it can be seen intuitively that due to the introduction of classical field, the peak value of nonreciprocal scattering spectrum is shifted and the nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ has an obvious splitting phenomenon. The difference in the Rabi frequency $\Omega$ causes a change in peaks and evolutionary processes. This phenomenon can be explained by Eq. (19). From Eq. (19), one can obtain that when $\Delta _{e}=\pm \Omega /2$, $\Delta T$ reaches the maximum value $\Delta T=1$, corresponding to the multi-peaks in Fig. 3(b). In particular, for the resonant photon, one can also find that when $\Omega =0$, the perfect nonreciprocal transmission can be achieved. But when $\Omega \neq 0$, the nonreciprocal transmission degree $\Delta T\equiv 0$. This interesting phenomenon can be used to design a switch diode by controlling the classical field. According to the above analysis, it can be found that we can adjust the Rabi frequency to realize the perfect nonreciprocal transmission at arbitrary detuning frequency, which provides an alternative effective method besides changing the phase difference to realize perfect nonreciprocal scattering.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a) The effect of Rabi frequency $\Omega$ and detuning $\Delta _{e}$ on nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$; (b) The nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ as a function of $\Delta _{e}$ with a certain Rabi frequency $\Omega$. The other parameters $\varphi _{0}=\Delta \theta =\pi /2$ and $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Frequency tunable nonreciprocal transmissions in the non-Markovian regime

Now we turn to consider the non-Markovian regime. Giant atom has been widely studied due to the self-interference effect caused by the structure of the multi-coupled point model. Experimentally, this regime corresponds to the case of superconducting transmon qubit coupled with surface acoustic waves on a piezoelectric substrate owing to the slow propagation speed of sound in solids [3840,43]. In this work, when the input wave length is smaller than the atom size, the transmission delay time $\tau$ caused by the distance between the coupling points is non-negligible. The phase $\varphi =\varphi _{0}+\tau \Delta _{e}$ strongly depends on the detuning $\Delta _{e}$. Then Eq. (16) can be written as

$$\Delta T=\frac{4\gamma_{e}\Gamma|\sin\Delta\theta \sin(\varphi_{0}+\tau\Delta_{e})|}{[\Delta_{e}-\frac{\Omega^2}{4\Delta_{e}}-2\Gamma\sin(\varphi_{0}+\tau\Delta_{e})\cos\Delta\theta]^{2}+[\frac{\gamma_{e}}{2}+2\Gamma(1+\cos(\varphi_{0}+\tau\Delta_{e})\cos\Delta\theta)]^{2}}.$$

The phenomenon of nonreciprocal transmission of single photon scattering caused by the non-Markovian effect is depicted in Fig. 4(a)-(b). To be specific, Fig. 4(a) shows the effect of detuning and time delay on the nonreciprocal degree with parameters $\varphi _{0}=\Delta \theta =\pi /2$, $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$ and Rabi frequency $\Omega =8\Gamma$. Similarly, when $\Delta _{e}=0$, the nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T=0$ and the incident photon is completely transmitted after interacting with the atom. Additionally, the nonreciprocal transmission can be achieved around $\Delta _{e}=\pm 4\Gamma$ and shows the characteristics of multiple segments when the time delay increases. This phenomenon is similar to the multiple excitations of the giant atom [73]. In order to see the impact of time delay directly, we investigate the $\Delta T$ with the changing of the detuning $\Delta _{e}$ when the time delay is fixed, as shown in Fig. 4(b). Indeed, as the time delay increases, the oscillation frequency becomes drastic and shows a certain periodicity. This phenomenon can be understood as follows. When $\varphi _{0}=\Delta \theta =\pi /2$, $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$ and $\Omega =8\Gamma$, Eq. (20) can be reduced as

$$\Delta T=\frac{16\Gamma^2|\cos\tau\Delta_{e}|}{[\Delta_{e}-\frac{16\Gamma^2}{\Delta_{e}}]^{2}+16\Gamma^2}.$$

According to Eq. (21), it is easy to find that the oscillating items of $\Delta T$ are mainly given by the numerator and the peaks are determined by the denominator. The oscillation frequency $\omega _{f}\propto \Gamma \tau$, which causes the oscillations to become more intense over time, as exhibited in Fig. 4(b). When $\tau \Delta _{e}=n\pi /2(n=1,3,5\cdots )$, $\Delta T=0$. The nonreciprocal phenomenon does not exist.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a) The nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ with the change of the detuning $\Delta _{e}$ and time delay $\Gamma \tau$ with $\Omega =8\Gamma$; (b) The nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ changes with $\Delta _{e}$ when the time delay $\Gamma \tau$ is fixed, with $\Omega =8\Gamma$; (c) The nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ as a function of $\Delta _{e}$ with different the Rabi frequencies $\Omega$. $\Gamma \tau$ is fixed as $\pi /2$. The other parameters $\Delta \theta =\varphi _{0}=\pi /2$ and $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$.

Download Full Size | PDF

Another important feature is that the system can still achieve perfect nonreciprocal transmission in the non-Markovian regime, as shown in Fig. 4(a). By analyzing Eq. (20), one can find that when

$$\Delta_{e}=2\Gamma\sin(\varphi_{0}+\tau\Delta_{e})\cos\Delta\theta+\Omega^2/(4\Delta_{e}),$$
$$4\gamma_{e}\Gamma|\sin\Delta\theta\sin(\varphi_{0}+\tau\Delta_{e})|=[\gamma_{e}/2+2\Gamma(1+\cos(\varphi_{0}+\tau\Delta_{e})\cos\Delta\theta)]^2,$$

$\Delta T$ reaches the maximum value $\Delta T=1$. To simplify the analyzing process, we continue to assume that $\varphi _{0}=\Delta \theta =\pi /2$. The Eqs. (22) and (23) can be rewritten as

$$\Delta_{e}=\Omega^2/(4\Delta_{e}),$$
$$4\gamma_{e}\Gamma|\cos\tau\Delta_{e}|=[\gamma_{e}/2+2\Gamma]^2.$$

The above equations show that when $\Delta _{e}=\pm \Omega /2$, $\tau \Delta _{e}=n\pi$ and $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$, $\Delta T$ is equal to 1. The perfect nonreciprocal transmission is achieved. The locations that $\Delta T$ can reach the maximum value of 1 are shifted by the classical field. For example, Fig.4(c) depicts the effect of $\Delta _{e}$ on the nonreciprocal transmission degree $\Delta T$ when the time delay $\Gamma \tau =\pi /2$. Based on the above analysis, one can observe that the perfect nonreciprocal transmission can be realized when $\Delta _{e}= 2n\Gamma (n=1,2,3{\ldots })$ with different Rabi frequencies. Compared with the Markovian regime, the existence of time delay makes that realization of perfect nonreciprocal transmission becomes more difficult. But the resulting physical phenomena are more abundant.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a frequency tunable single photon nonreciprocal scattering device in a waveguide coupling to a giant system has been presented. The scattering probability amplitudes of single photon incident from different directions of the waveguide are calculated in both the Markovian and non-Markovian regime. In the Markovian regime, the perfect nonreciprocal transmission $\Delta T=1$ can be realized at different single photon frequencies $\Delta _{e}$ by adjusting the Rabi frequency of the classical field. In the non-Markovian regime, the time delay resulting from the photon propagation between two coupling points leads to transmission spectrum showing periodic oscillations and reviving with multiple peaks. The oscillation period is determined by $\Gamma \tau$. The conditions for realization the perfect nonreciprocal transmission are also given based on the analytical results in the non-Markovian regime. The final results show that the nonreciprocal single photon transmission can be realized for the non-resonant photon by adjusting the classical field both in Markovian regime and non-Markovian regime. For the resonant photon, one can design a switchful diode by turning on/off the classical field.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (119075023); Major Project of Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Provincial Department of Education (2022AH040053); Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Quantum Technology and Device (20220101).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. M. Hafezi and P. Rabl, “Optomechanically induced non-reciprocity in microring resonators,” Opt. Express 20(7), 7672–7684 (2012). [CrossRef]  

2. A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, “Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering,” Phys. Rev. X 5(2), 021025 (2015). [CrossRef]  

3. E. J. Lenferink, G. Wei, and N. P. Stern, “Coherent optical non-reciprocity in axisymmetric resonators,” Opt. Express 22(13), 16099–16111 (2014). [CrossRef]  

4. K. Xia, G. Lu, G. Lin, Y. Cheng, Y. Niu, S. Gong, and J. Twamley, “Reversible nonmagnetic single-photon isolation using unbalanced quantum coupling,” Phys. Rev. A 90(4), 043802 (2014). [CrossRef]  

5. L. Bi, J. Hu, P. Jiang, D. H. Kim, G. F. Dionne, L. C. Kimerling, and C. Ross, “On-chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non-reciprocal optical resonators,” Nat. Photonics 5(12), 758–762 (2011). [CrossRef]  

6. Z. Yu and S. Fan, “Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions,” Nat. Photonics 3(2), 91–94 (2009). [CrossRef]  

7. S. F. Mingaleev and Y. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear transmission and light localization in photonic-crystal waveguides,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19(9), 2241–2249 (2002). [CrossRef]  

8. E. Verhagen and A. Alù, “Optomechanical nonreciprocity,” Nat. Phys. 13(10), 922–924 (2017). [CrossRef]  

9. X. Wang, W.-X. Yang, A.-X. Chen, L. Li, T. Shui, X. Li, and Z. Wu, “Phase-modulated single-photon nonreciprocal transport and directional router in a waveguide–cavity–emitter system beyond the chiral coupling,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 7(1), 015025 (2022). [CrossRef]  

10. X.-W. Xu, A.-X. Chen, Y. Li, and Y.-x. Liu, “Nonreciprocal single-photon frequency converter via multiple semi-infinite coupled-resonator waveguides,” Phys. Rev. A 96(5), 053853 (2017). [CrossRef]  

11. M. Scheucher, A. Hilico, E. Will, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Quantum optical circulator controlled by a single chirally coupled atom,” Science 354(6319), 1577–1580 (2016). [CrossRef]  

12. I. Söllner, S. Mahmoodian, S. L. Hansen, L. Midolo, A. Javadi, G. Kiršanskė, T. Pregnolato, H. El-Ella, E. H. Lee, J. D. Song, S. Stobbe, and P. Lodahl, “Deterministic photon–emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(9), 775–778 (2015). [CrossRef]  

13. P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeutel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, “Chiral quantum optics,” Nature 541(7638), 473–480 (2017). [CrossRef]  

14. A. Soro and A. F. Kockum, “Chiral quantum optics with giant atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 105(2), 023712 (2022). [CrossRef]  

15. X. Wang and H.-R. Li, “Chiral quantum network with giant atoms,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 7(3), 035007 (2022). [CrossRef]  

16. W.-B. Yan, W.-Y. Ni, J. Zhang, F.-Y. Zhang, and H. Fan, “Tunable single-photon diode by chiral quantum physics,” Phys. Rev. A 98(4), 043852 (2018). [CrossRef]  

17. C.-H. Yan, Y. Li, H. Yuan, and L. Wei, “Targeted photonic routers with chiral photon-atom interactions,” Phys. Rev. A 97(2), 023821 (2018). [CrossRef]  

18. L. Tang, J. Tang, W. Zhang, G. Lu, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, K. Xia, and M. Xiao, “On-chip chiral single-photon interface: Isolation and unidirectional emission,” Phys. Rev. A 99(4), 043833 (2019). [CrossRef]  

19. C.-H. Yan, M. Li, X.-B. Xu, Y.-L. Zhang, H. Yuan, and C.-L. Zou, “Unidirectional transmission of single photons under nonideal chiral photon-atom interactions,” Phys. Rev. A 102(5), 053719 (2020). [CrossRef]  

20. C. Sayrin, C. Junge, R. Mitsch, B. Albrecht, D. O’Shea, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Nanophotonic optical isolator controlled by the internal state of cold atoms,” Phys. Rev. X 5(4), 041036 (2015). [CrossRef]  

21. D. Hurst, D. Price, C. Bentham, M. Makhonin, B. Royall, E. Clarke, P. Kok, L. Wilson, M. Skolnick, and A. Fox, “Nonreciprocal transmission and reflection of a chirally coupled quantum dot,” Nano Lett. 18(9), 5475–5481 (2018). [CrossRef]  

22. Y. You, Y. Hu, G. Lin, Y. Qi, Y. Niu, and S. Gong, “Quantum nonreciprocity based on electromagnetically induced transparency in chiral quantum-optical systems,” Phys. Rev. A 103(6), 063706 (2021). [CrossRef]  

23. C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, E. Moreno, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and A. Gonzalez-Tudela, “Nonreciprocal few-photon routing schemes based on chiral waveguide-emitter couplings,” Phys. Rev. A 94(6), 063817 (2016). [CrossRef]  

24. X.-W. Xu, A.-X. Chen, Y. Li, and Y.-X. Liu, “Single-photon nonreciprocal transport in one-dimensional coupled-resonator waveguides,” Phys. Rev. A 95(6), 063808 (2017). [CrossRef]  

25. X. Xu, Y. Zhao, H. Wang, A. Chen, and Y.-X. Liu, “Nonreciprocal transition between two nondegenerate energy levels,” Photonics Res. 9(5), 879–886 (2021). [CrossRef]  

26. X. Wang, T. Shui, L. Li, X. Li, Z. Wu, and W.-X. Yang, “Tunable single-photon diode and circulator via chiral waveguide–emitter couplings,” Laser Phys. Lett. 17(6), 065201 (2020). [CrossRef]  

27. C.-M. Kim, N.-C. Kim, M.-C. Ko, J.-S. Ryom, and H.-C. Choe, “Single plasmon routing with the four quantum dots coupled to a cross-type plasmonic waveguide,” Quantum Inf. Process. 22(6), 226 (2023). [CrossRef]  

28. S.-G. Kim, N.-C. Kim, M.-C. Ko, J.-S. Ryom, S.-R. Ri, C.-M. Kim, and S.-I. Choe, “Wavelength division multiplexing-like quantum routing for single plasmons in the quantum dots–waveguides hybrid system,” J. Low Temp. Phys. 209(1-2), 54–67 (2022). [CrossRef]  

29. L. Yuan, S. Xu, and S. Fan, “Achieving nonreciprocal unidirectional single-photon quantum transport using the photonic aharonov–bohm effect,” Opt. Lett. 40(22), 5140–5143 (2015). [CrossRef]  

30. Y.-L. Ren, S.-L. Ma, J.-K. Xie, X.-K. Li, M.-T. Cao, and F.-L. Li, “Nonreciprocal single-photon quantum router,” Phys. Rev. A 105(1), 013711 (2022). [CrossRef]  

31. Z. Wang, L. Du, Y. Li, and Y.-X. Liu, “Phase-controlled single-photon nonreciprocal transmission in a one-dimensional waveguide,” Phys. Rev. A 100(5), 053809 (2019). [CrossRef]  

32. L. Jin and Z. Song, “Incident direction independent wave propagation and unidirectional lasing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(7), 073901 (2018). [CrossRef]  

33. L. Jin, “Asymmetric lasing at spectral singularities,” Phys. Rev. A 97(3), 033840 (2018). [CrossRef]  

34. C. Li, L. Jin, and Z. Song, “Non-hermitian interferometer: Unidirectional amplification without distortion,” Phys. Rev. A 95(2), 022125 (2017). [CrossRef]  

35. K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, “Generalized non-reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering,” Nat. Phys. 13(5), 465–471 (2017). [CrossRef]  

36. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-photon interactions: basic processes and applications (John Wiley & Sons, 1998), chap. 2.

37. Z.-Q. Wang, Y.-P. Wang, J. Yao, R.-C. Shen, W.-J. Wu, J. Qian, J. Li, S.-Y. Zhu, and J. You, “Giant spin ensembles in waveguide magnonics,” Nat. Commun. 13(1), 7580 (2022). [CrossRef]  

38. G. Andersson, B. Suri, L. Guo, T. Aref, and P. Delsing, “Non-exponential decay of a giant artificial atom,” Nat. Phys. 15(11), 1123–1127 (2019). [CrossRef]  

39. B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. Frisk Kockum, J. Braumüller, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Vepsäläinen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, “Waveguide quantum electrodynamics with superconducting artificial giant atoms,” Nature 583(7818), 775–779 (2020). [CrossRef]  

40. A. Vadiraj, A. Ask, T. McConkey, I. Nsanzineza, C. S. Chang, A. F. Kockum, and C. Wilson, “Engineering the level structure of a giant artificial atom in waveguide quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. A 103(2), 023710 (2021). [CrossRef]  

41. G. Zhang and Z. Dong, “Linear quantum systems: a tutorial,” Annu. Rev. Control 54, 274–294 (2022). [CrossRef]  

42. H. Ding and G. Zhang, “Quantum coherent feedback control with photons,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (2023).

43. A. F. Kockum, P. Delsing, and G. Johansson, “Designing frequency-dependent relaxation rates and lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom,” Phys. Rev. A 90(1), 013837 (2014). [CrossRef]  

44. A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, “Decoherence-free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(14), 140404 (2018). [CrossRef]  

45. A. Carollo, D. Cilluffo, and F. Ciccarello, “Mechanism of decoherence-free coupling between giant atoms,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2(4), 043184 (2020). [CrossRef]  

46. L. Du, L. Guo, and Y. Li, “Complex decoherence-free interactions between giant atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 107(2), 023705 (2023). [CrossRef]  

47. A. Soro, C. S. Mu noz, and A. F. Kockum, “Interaction between giant atoms in a one-dimensional structured environment,” Phys. Rev. A 107(1), 013710 (2023). [CrossRef]  

48. Q.-Y. Qiu, Y. Wu, and X.-Y. Lü, “Collective radiance of giant atoms in non-markovian regime,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66(2), 224212 (2023). [CrossRef]  

49. L. Du, Y. Zhang, and Y. Li, “A giant atom with modulated transition frequency,” Front. Phys. 18(1), 12301 (2023). [CrossRef]  

50. L. Guo, A. F. Kockum, F. Marquardt, and G. Johansson, “Oscillating bound states for a giant atom,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2(4), 043014 (2020). [CrossRef]  

51. X. Wang, T. Liu, A. F. Kockum, H.-R. Li, and F. Nori, “Tunable chiral bound states with giant atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(4), 043602 (2021). [CrossRef]  

52. K. H. Lim, W.-K. Mok, and L.-C. Kwek, “Oscillating bound states in non-markovian photonic lattices,” Phys. Rev. A 107(2), 023716 (2023). [CrossRef]  

53. H. Xiao, L. Wang, Z.-H. Li, X. Chen, and L. Yuan, “Bound state in a giant atom-modulated resonators system,” npj Quantum Inf. 8(1), 80 (2022). [CrossRef]  

54. X.-L. Yin and J.-Q. Liao, “Giant-atom entanglement in waveguide-qed systems including non-markovian effect,” arXiv, arXiv:2303.14746 (2023). [CrossRef]  

55. H. Yu, Z. Wang, and J.-H. Wu, “Entanglement preparation and nonreciprocal excitation evolution in giant atoms by controllable dissipation and coupling,” Phys. Rev. A 104(1), 013720 (2021). [CrossRef]  

56. A. C. Santos and R. Bachelard, “Generation of maximally entangled long-lived states with giant atoms in a waveguide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(5), 053601 (2023). [CrossRef]  

57. X.-L. Yin, W.-B. Luo, and J.-Q. Liao, “Non-markovian disentanglement dynamics in double-giant-atom waveguide-qed systems,” Phys. Rev. A 106(6), 063703 (2022). [CrossRef]  

58. Y.-T. Chen, L. Du, L. Guo, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and J.-H. Wu, “Nonreciprocal and chiral single-photon scattering for giant atoms,” Commun. Phys. 5(1), 215 (2022). [CrossRef]  

59. N. Liu, X. Wang, X. Wang, X.-S. Ma, and M.-T. Cheng, “Tunable single photon nonreciprocal scattering based on giant atom-waveguide chiral couplings,” Opt. Express 30(13), 23428–23438 (2022). [CrossRef]  

60. C. Wang, X.-S. Ma, and M.-T. Cheng, “Giant atom-mediated single photon routing between two waveguides,” Opt. Express 29(24), 40116–40124 (2021). [CrossRef]  

61. Q. Cai and W. Jia, “Coherent single-photon scattering spectra for a giant-atom waveguide-qed system beyond the dipole approximation,” Phys. Rev. A 104(3), 033710 (2021). [CrossRef]  

62. S. Feng and W. Jia, “Manipulating single-photon transport in a waveguide-qed structure containing two giant atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 104(6), 063712 (2021). [CrossRef]  

63. W. Zhao and Z. Wang, “Single-photon scattering and bound states in an atom-waveguide system with two or multiple coupling points,” Phys. Rev. A 101(5), 053855 (2020). [CrossRef]  

64. L. Du and Y. Li, “Single-photon frequency conversion via a giant Λ-type atom,” Phys. Rev. A 104(2), 023712 (2021). [CrossRef]  

65. L. Du, Y.-T. Chen, and Y. Li, “Nonreciprocal frequency conversion with chiral Λ-type atoms,” Phys. Rev. Res. 3(4), 043226 (2021). [CrossRef]  

66. X.-J. Sun, W.-X. Liu, H. Chen, and H.-R. Li, “Tunable single-photon nonreciprocal scattering and targeted router in a giant atom-waveguide system with chiral couplings,” Commun. Theor. Phys. 75(3), 035103 (2023). [CrossRef]  

67. J.-T. Shen and S. Fan, “Coherent photon transport from spontaneous emission in one-dimensional waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 30(15), 2001–2003 (2005). [CrossRef]  

68. J.-T. Shen and S. Fan, “Theory of single-photon transport in a single-mode waveguide. i. coupling to a cavity containing a two-level atom,” Phys. Rev. A 79(2), 023837 (2009). [CrossRef]  

69. D. Mukhopadhyay and G. S. Agarwal, “Transparency in a chain of disparate quantum emitters strongly coupled to a waveguide,” Phys. Rev. A 101(6), 063814 (2020). [CrossRef]  

70. X.-T. Xie, W. Li, J. Li, W.-X. Yang, A. Yuan, and X. Yang, “Transverse acoustic wave in molecular magnets via electromagnetically induced transparency,” Phys. Rev. B 75(18), 184423 (2007). [CrossRef]  

71. Z. Liao, X. Zeng, H. Nha, and M. S. Zubairy, “Photon transport in a one-dimensional nanophotonic waveguide qed system,” Phys. Scr. 91(6), 063004 (2016). [CrossRef]  

72. Z. Liao, X. Zeng, S.-Y. Zhu, and M. S. Zubairy, “Single-photon transport through an atomic chain coupled to a one-dimensional nanophotonic waveguide,” Phys. Rev. A 92(2), 023806 (2015). [CrossRef]  

73. L. Du, Y.-T. Chen, Y. Zhang, and Y. Li, “Giant atoms with time-dependent couplings,” Phys. Rev. Res. 4(2), 023198 (2022). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. A three-level giant atom coupled to the waveguide, where the coupling points at $x=0$ and $x=d$. $ge^{i\theta _{1}}$ and $ge^{i\theta _{2}}$ are the coupling strength, $|g\rangle$ represents the ground state, $|e\rangle$ and $|s\rangle$ represents different excited states. $\gamma _{e}(\gamma _{s})$ represents the energy loss of state $|e\rangle (|s\rangle )$. The transition $|e\rangle \leftrightarrow |s\rangle$ is driven by a classical laser beam with Rabi frequency $\Omega$.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The effect of phase factors on $\Delta T$ with a certainly Rabi frequency $\Omega$. (a) shows the influence of phase accumulation $\varphi _{0}$ on $\Delta T$ with $\Delta \theta =\pi /2$, $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$ and $\Omega =8\Gamma$; (b) shows the influence of coupling phase difference $\Delta \theta$ on $\Delta T$ with $\varphi =\pi /2$, $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$ and $\Omega =8\Gamma$; (c) The transmission probability and the nonreciprocal degree as a function of $\Delta _{e}$, the other parameters are shown in the figure; (d) shows the influence of dissipation $\gamma _{e}$ on $\Delta T$ with $\Delta \theta =\varphi _{0}=\pi /2$ and $\Omega =8\Gamma$.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) The effect of Rabi frequency $\Omega$ and detuning $\Delta _{e}$ on nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$; (b) The nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ as a function of $\Delta _{e}$ with a certain Rabi frequency $\Omega$. The other parameters $\varphi _{0}=\Delta \theta =\pi /2$ and $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) The nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ with the change of the detuning $\Delta _{e}$ and time delay $\Gamma \tau$ with $\Omega =8\Gamma$; (b) The nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ changes with $\Delta _{e}$ when the time delay $\Gamma \tau$ is fixed, with $\Omega =8\Gamma$; (c) The nonreciprocal degree $\Delta T$ as a function of $\Delta _{e}$ with different the Rabi frequencies $\Omega$. $\Gamma \tau$ is fixed as $\pi /2$. The other parameters $\Delta \theta =\varphi _{0}=\pi /2$ and $\gamma _{e}=4\Gamma$.

Equations (25)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H = H a + H w + H i n t ,
H a = ( ω e i γ e 2 ) σ e e + ( ω e i γ s 2 ) σ s s + Ω 2 ( σ e s + σ s e ) ,
H w = i v g d x c R ( x ) x c R ( x ) + i v g d x c L ( x ) x c L ( x ) ,
H i n t = j = 1 , 2 δ ( x x j ) g j [ c R ( x ) σ g e + c L ( x ) σ g e ] + H.c.
| Ψ = d x [ u R ( x ) c R ( x ) + u L ( x ) c L ( x ) ] | 0 , v + u e | 0 , e + u s | 0 , s ,
ω u R ( x ) = i v g x u R ( x ) + g e i θ 1 δ ( x ) u e + g e i θ 2 δ ( x d ) u e ,
ω u L ( x ) = i v g x u L ( x ) + g e i θ 1 δ ( x ) u e + g e i θ 2 δ ( x d ) u e ,
ω u e = g e i θ 1 [ u L ( 0 ) + u R ( 0 ) ] + g e i θ 2 [ u L ( d ) + u R ( d ) ] + ( ω e i γ e 2 ) u e + Ω 2 u s ,
ω u s = ( ω e i γ s 2 ) u s + Ω 2 u s .
u R ( x ) = e i k x [ h ( x ) + a h ( x ) h ( d x ) + t l h ( x d ) ] ,
u L ( x ) = e i k x [ r l h ( x ) + b h ( x ) h ( d x ) ] .
t l = Δ e + D ( ω ) 2 Γ e i Δ θ sin φ Δ e + D ( ω ) + 2 i Γ ( 1 + e i φ cos Δ θ ) ,
r l = 2 i Γ e i φ ( cos Δ θ + cos φ ) Δ e + D ( ω ) + 2 i Γ ( 1 + e i φ cos Δ θ ) ,
t r = Δ e + D ( ω ) 2 Γ e i Δ θ sin φ Δ e + D ( ω ) + 2 i Γ ( 1 + e i φ cos Δ θ ) ,
r r = 2 i Γ e i φ ( cos Δ θ + cos φ ) Δ e + D ( ω ) + 2 i Γ ( 1 + e i φ cos Δ θ ) ,
Δ T = 4 γ e Γ | sin Δ θ sin φ 0 | [ Δ e Ω 2 4 Δ e 2 Γ sin φ 0 cos Δ θ ] 2 + [ γ e 2 + 2 Γ ( 1 + cos φ 0 cos Δ θ ) ] 2 .
Δ e = 2 Γ sin φ 0 cos Δ θ + Ω 2 / 4 Δ e ,
4 γ e Γ | sin Δ θ sin φ 0 | = [ γ e / 2 + 2 Γ ( 1 + cos φ 0 cos Δ θ ) ] 2 .
Δ T = 16 Γ 2 ( Δ e Ω 2 / 4 Δ e ) 2 + 16 Γ 2 .
Δ T = 4 γ e Γ | sin Δ θ sin ( φ 0 + τ Δ e ) | [ Δ e Ω 2 4 Δ e 2 Γ sin ( φ 0 + τ Δ e ) cos Δ θ ] 2 + [ γ e 2 + 2 Γ ( 1 + cos ( φ 0 + τ Δ e ) cos Δ θ ) ] 2 .
Δ T = 16 Γ 2 | cos τ Δ e | [ Δ e 16 Γ 2 Δ e ] 2 + 16 Γ 2 .
Δ e = 2 Γ sin ( φ 0 + τ Δ e ) cos Δ θ + Ω 2 / ( 4 Δ e ) ,
4 γ e Γ | sin Δ θ sin ( φ 0 + τ Δ e ) | = [ γ e / 2 + 2 Γ ( 1 + cos ( φ 0 + τ Δ e ) cos Δ θ ) ] 2 ,
Δ e = Ω 2 / ( 4 Δ e ) ,
4 γ e Γ | cos τ Δ e | = [ γ e / 2 + 2 Γ ] 2 .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.