Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Linewidth-tolerant 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM transmission using a pilot-carrier based phase-noise cancelling technique

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We experimentally demonstrated linewidth-tolerant 10-Gbit/s (2.5-Gsymbol/s) 16-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) by using a distributed-feedback laser diode (DFB-LD) with a linewidth of 30 MHz. Error-free operation, a bit-error rate (BER) of <10-9 was achieved in transmission over 120 km of standard single mode fiber (SSMF) without any dispersion compensation. The phase-noise canceling capability provided by a pilot-carrier and standard electronic pre-equalization to suppress inter-symbol interference (ISI) gave clear 16-QAM constellations and floor-less BER characteristics. We evaluated the BER characteristics by real-time measurement of six (three different thresholds for each I- and Q-component) symbol error rates (SERs) with simultaneous constellation observation.

©2008 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Multi-level modulation/demodulation techniques are expected to effectively accommodate the endlessly growing internet traffic on photonic networks by saving lambda and bandwidth resources, just like in wireless communication systems. M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (M-QAM) is an important technique for attaining higher than four-bits-per-symbol modulation [1-4]. In M-QAM optical multi-level transmission, however, there are several technical issues to be overcome. First, the spectral linewidth requirements of the light source are extremely stringent. For example, for 16-QAM detection in optical phase-locked loop homodyne detection even with zero loop delay, a linewidth-to-bit-rate ratio of 1.4×10-6 (14 kHz linewidth for 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM) is theoretically required [1]. Even when using digital carrier phase estimation, a 16-QAM system must attain a ratio of 3.0×10-6 (30 kHz linewidth for 10 Gbit/s) [5]. For instance, 64-QAM and 128-QAM at 1-Gsymbol/s transmission have been experimentally demonstrated using a frequency-stabilized light source with 4-kHz linewidth [4]. Second, suppression of inter-symbol interference (ISI) in multi-level modulation should be seriously taken into account [1,6]. Specially-designed modulators, which can work in binary mode to suppress ISI, for 16-QAM with a modulation speed of more than 10 Gsymbol/s have been reported [7,8]. However, error-free performance has not yet been achieved. Finally, all of these reported M-QAM experiments have been demonstrated only in off-line mode; therefore, the constellation and bit-error-rate (BER) were not measured simultaneously in real time, and the obtained BER performance was limited to larger than 10-5.

In this paper, we report, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, the demonstration of 2.5-Gsymbol/s (10-Gbit/s) 16-QAM transmission over 120 km of standard single-mode fiber (SSMF) without offline processing after detection and without any dispersion compensation, achieving a floor-less BER performance of less than 10-9 using a distributed-feedback laser diode (DFB-LD) with a linewidth of 30 MHz. We employed an optical phase-noise canceling technique based on a polarization-multiplexed pilot-carrier to take advantage of the linewidth-tolerant characteristics of the scheme [9]. Some other phase-noise insensitive coherent systems in a binary modulation scheme were studied in [10]. The 16-QAM signal was modulated by a simple I-Q vector modulator with a branch for the pilot-carrier supply. ISI mainly caused in the modulator and driver electric amplifiers was compensated by applying a standard electronic pre-equalization (pre-EQ) technique, which is also applicable to the compensation of dispersion and optical nonlinearity [11,12].

2. Experimental setup

Figure 1(a) shows the experimental setup for the 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM transmission. A DFB-LD with an emission wavelength of 1551 nm and a linewidth of 30 MHz was employed as a light source. We used a pilot-carrier vector modulator, where only the TM polarization component was modulated through an I-Q vector modulator for 16-QAM, and the TE component served to generate a polarization-multiplexed pilot-carrier for optical phase-noise cancellation in a self-homodyne receiver [9]. Though the pilot-carrier can be used to carry independent information as experimentally demonstrated in [9], it was kept unmodulated for simplicity in this experiment. For this purpose, the modulator consisted of polarization beam splitters (PBSs), a dual-electrode I-Q vector modulator in the TM path, and a TE path for the pilot-carrier, as shown in Fig. 1(b). All of these elements were monolithically integrated in a LiNbO3 waveguide. The optical insertion loss and half-wave voltage of the modulator were 11 dB and 3 V, respectively. To attain best performance, the optical power of the pilot-carrier was adjusted to be about 50 % of the total modulator output power, by a first polarization controller (PC1) [13]. Two sets of complementary four-level electrical 2.5-Gsymbol/s 16-QAM signals, ±Data-I and ±Data-Q (−Data-I,Q is complementary logic to +Data-I,Q), were applied to the modulator from an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG). 16-QAM patterns for Data-I and Data-Q were generated from two sets of two binary 29-1 pseudo-random bit sequence (PRBS) patterns having 40-bit mutual delay to obtain de-correlation. Here, electronic pre-EQ by digital equalization with a 16-tap transversal filter was applied to Data-I and Data-Q independently to suppress ISI distortion caused by non-ideal frequency characteristics of the modulator and electric devices. The gain coefficients of the 16 taps were determined by a least mean squares (LMS) algorithm. The 120-km fiber transmission line consisted of two 60-km lengths of SSMF without any dispersion compensation (17 ps/nm/km), with a coupled optical power of +6 dBm. The polarization mode dispersion (PMD) coefficient of the transmission fiber was 0.05 ps/km0.5. At the receiver side, an optical preamplifier was followed by an optical band pass filter (OBPF) with 1-nm pass bandwidth, and the signal was divided by a 3-dB coupler into in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) arms, each including manual polarization controllers (PC2, PC3), PBSs, and balanced photo-detectors (PDs) with RF pre-amplifiers for self-homodyne detection. PC2 and PC3 were used not only to control the polarizations, but also to make π/2 phase difference between I and Q arms. PBSs work to coherently mix the two polarization components of optical signal and pilot-carrier in the same manner as common homodyne does [14]. The symbol-error-rate (SER) at 2.5 Gsymbol/s was measured with an error detector (ED) in real time by adjusting the threshold levels, Tha, Thb, and Thc, one by one, for each I- and Q-component, as shown in Fig. 2. The total SER of the 16-QAM transmission can be obtained by summing the measured error rates at all threshold levels of the I- and Q-components. Assuming Gray-coding, the BER is one-fourth of the total SER because 16-QAM is four-bits-per-symbol modulation. We simultaneously observed the constellation and eye-diagram using an oscilloscope.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) Experimental setup for 10-Gbit/s (2.5-Gsymbol/s) 16-QAM self-homodyne transmission and (b) pilot-carrier vector modulator.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. 16-QAM constellation and threshold levels to characterize the SER performance.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Constellation and eye-diagrams of the received 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM signals using EC-LD (a), DFB-LD (b), and DFB-LD with 120-km SSMF transmission (c).

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Results and discussion

First, for comparison, we conducted an experiment using an external-cavity laser diode (EC-LD), having a linewidth of 200 kHz, as the light source in a back-to-back (BtB) configuration without the SSMF. The observed constellation and eye-diagrams of the I- and Q-components for the EC-LD setup are shown in Fig. 3(a). Clear signal-point spacing and four-level eye-opening were observed, thanks to the suppression of ISI by the pre-EQ. The received optical power was set at −20 dBm (the received optical power includes the power of the pilot-carrier). The eye-opening of the Q-component was degraded by about 20 % as compared with that of the I-component. We believe this was caused chiefly by un-balancing of the sub-Mach-Zehnder for the Q-component in the vector modulator. Figure 3(b) shows the observed constellation and eye-diagrams of the self-homodyne detection in the BtB configuration using the 30-MHz DFB-LD. It should be noted that clear signal-point spacing and eye-opening were observed in spite of the large phase noise of the DFB-LD; this is thanks to the phase-noise cancelling capability of the pilot-carrier scheme. Figure 3(c) shows the constellation and eye-diagrams after transmission through the 120-km SSMF. The eye-diagrams were distorted slightly, mainly by the accumulated dispersion of the SSMF. Nevertheless, a clear eye-opening was obtained due to the bandwidth efficient 16-QAM format at 2.5 Gsymbol/s. Figure 4 shows the optical spectrum (0.01-nm resolution) of the 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM optical signal measured at the output of the modulator. We observed the spectral-efficient spectrum with a 20-dB-down full bandwidth of only 5 GHz, achieving the spectral efficiency of 2 bit/s/Hz. Higher spectral efficiency for multi-carrier transmission can be achieved by polarization-division multiplexing where the polarization-multiplexed pilot-carrier is modulated. Furthermore, tight optical filtering supported by forward-error correction (FEC) will improve the spectral efficiency. Figure 5 shows the SER measured at each threshold level explained in Fig. 2 above. The SER performance using the EC-LD in the BtB configuration is shown in Fig. 5(a). Negligibly small SER-performance difference was observed for all threshold levels, Tha to Thc in each I- and Q-component, whereas the error-performance of the Q-component was worse than that of the I-component by less than 4 dB because of the smaller eye-opening explained above. Figure 5(b) shows the SER performance using the DFB-LD in the BtB configuration. We could not observe any error floor at all threshold levels in spite of the large phase-noise of the DFB-LD. However, we observed comparatively large error-performance degradation in the outer inter-symbol transition at the threshold levels Tha and Thc, which is apparent from the constellation in Fig. 3(b). The SER performance after the 120-km SSMF transmission is shown in Fig. 5(c); we did not observe any notable large penalty because of the clear eye-opening, as shown in Fig. 3(c). Finally, the BER performance of the 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM signals was obtained from the measured SERs and is plotted in Fig. 6. It should be noted that floor-less BER characteristics of less than 10-9 were achieved in all cases. The power penalty for using the 30-MHz DFB-LD in the BtB configuration was less than 2 dB at a BER of 10-9 compared with the performance using the 200-kHz EC-LD. Furthermore, the power penalty for the 120-km SSMF transmission without any dispersion compensation was less than 1 dB at a BER of 10-9. In our previous report [13], the proposed scheme with quadrature phase-shift-keying (QPSK) data format showed dispersion and PMD tolerance which was comparable with that of differential QPSK at 10-Gsymbol/s. One different point from conventional schemes is that coherency between the signal and pilot-carrier affects the performance of the system. However, it is not a serious problem because PMD in a long-haul transmission line is usually smaller enough than coherent time of a DFB-LD even when the linewidth is as large as 30 MHz. Therefore, longer transmission is possible if the dispersion is compensated. The experimental results clearly show the advantage of the linewidth-tolerant characteristics of the pilot-carrier scheme, even in the case of 16-QAM.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Optical spectrum for 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM optical signal using DFB-LD.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. SER characteristics of the 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM signals using EC-LD (a), DFB-LD (b), and DFB-LD with 120-km SSMF transmission (c).

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. BER characteristics of the 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM signals using EC-LD, DFB-LD, and DFB-LD with 120-km SSMF transmission.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

We experimentally demonstrated 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM transmission using a DFB-LD with a linewidth of 30 MHz for the first time. Thanks to the combination of the phase-noise cancelling capability of the self-homodyne technique and a standard electronic pre-equalization technique, we confirmed clear 16-QAM constellations and error-free characteristics with a BER of less than 10-9, as well as a receiver sensitivity penalty of less than 2 dB compared with the case using the EC-LD with 200-kHz linewidth. Furthermore, we also successfully demonstrated error-free transmission over 120-km SSMF without any dispersion compensation. We evaluated BER characteristics of the 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM signals from all six (three different thresholds for each of the I and Q components) SERs measured in real-time at 2.5 Gsymbol/s. Our proposed scheme will allow the use of inexpensive light sources and less-complex transmitters with fewer driver amplifiers for M-QAM multi-bit-per-symbol transmission systems.

References and links

1. E. Ip and J. M. Kahn, “Carrier synchronization for 3- and 4-bit-per-symbol optical transmission,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23, 4110–4124 (2005). [CrossRef]  

2. A. P. T. Lau and J. M. Kahn, “16-QAM signal design and detection in presence of nonlinear phase noise,” in Proc. LEOS Summer Topical Meetings, Portland, USA, paper TuA4.4 (2007).

3. M. Seimetz“Performance of coherent optical square-16-QAM-systems based on IQ-transmitters and homodyne receivers with digital phase estimation,” in Proc. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC2006), Anaheim, USA, paper NWA4 (2006).

4. M. Yoshida, H. Goto, K. Kasai, and M. Nakazawa, “64 and 128 coherent QAM optical transmission over 150 km using frequency-stabilized laser and heterodyne PLL detection,” Opt. Express 16, 829–840 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. M. Seimetz, “Laser linewidth limitations for optical systems with high-order modulation employing feed forward digital carrier phase estimation,” in Proc. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC2008), San Diego, USA, paper OTuM2 (2008).

6. N. Kikuchi, “Intersymbol interference (ISI) suppression technique for optical binary and multilevel signal generation,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25, 2060–2068 (2007). [CrossRef]  

7. C. R. Doerr, P. J. Winzer, L. Zhang, L. L. Buhl, and N. J. Sauer, “Monolithic InP 16-QAM modulator,” in Proc. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC2008), San Diego, USA, paper PDP20 (2008).

8. T. Sakamoto, A. Chiba, and T. Kawanishi, “50-Gb/s 16 QAM by a quad-parallel Mach-Zehnder modulator,” in Proc. European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC2007), Berlin, Germany, paper PD2.8 (2007).

9. M. Nakamura, Y. Kamio, and T. Miyazaki, “Pilot-carrier based linewidth-tolerant 8PSK self-homodyne using only one modulator” in Proc. European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC2007), Berlin, Germany, paper 8.3.6 (2007).

10. S. Betti, F. Curti, G. De Marchis, and E. Iannone, “Phase noise and polarization state insensitive optical coherent systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 8, 756–767 (1990). [CrossRef]  

11. R. I. Killey, P. M. Watts, V. Mikhailov, M. Glick, and P. Bayvel, “Electronic dispersion compensation by signal predistortion using digital processing and a dual-drive Mach-Zehnder modulator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17, 714–716 (2005). [CrossRef]  

12. K. Roberts, C. Li, L. Strawczynski, M. O‘Sullivan, and I. Hardcastle, “Electronic precompensation of optical nonlinearity,” IEEE Photon. Techol. Lett. 18, 403–405 (2006). [CrossRef]  

13. M. Nakamura, Y. Kamio, and T. Miyazaki, “PMD- and dispersion-tolerance of QPSK homodyne detection using a polarization-multiplexed pilot carrier,” in Proc. European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC2006), Cannes, France, paper Mo4.2.5 (2006). [CrossRef]  

14. Govind P. Agrawal, Fiber-optic communication systems, Second Edition, (Wiley-Interscience, 1997) Chapter 6.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Experimental setup for 10-Gbit/s (2.5-Gsymbol/s) 16-QAM self-homodyne transmission and (b) pilot-carrier vector modulator.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. 16-QAM constellation and threshold levels to characterize the SER performance.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Constellation and eye-diagrams of the received 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM signals using EC-LD (a), DFB-LD (b), and DFB-LD with 120-km SSMF transmission (c).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Optical spectrum for 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM optical signal using DFB-LD.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. SER characteristics of the 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM signals using EC-LD (a), DFB-LD (b), and DFB-LD with 120-km SSMF transmission (c).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. BER characteristics of the 10-Gbit/s 16-QAM signals using EC-LD, DFB-LD, and DFB-LD with 120-km SSMF transmission.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.