Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Effects of pump recycling technique on stimulated Brillouin scattering threshold: A theoretical model

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We develop a theoretical model that can be used to predict stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) threshold in optical fibers that arises through the effect of Brillouin pump recycling technique. Obtained simulation results from our model are in close agreement with our experimental results. The developed model utilizes single mode optical fiber of different lengths as the Brillouin gain media. For 5-km long single mode fiber, the calculated threshold power for SBS is about 16 mW for conventional technique. This value is reduced to about 8 mW when the residual Brillouin pump is recycled at the end of the fiber. The decrement of SBS threshold is due to longer interaction lengths between Brillouin pump and Stokes wave.

©2010 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) is a fundamental nonlinear optical process in optical-fiber communication systems [1]. Classically, in SBS a portion of laser power incident on an optical medium is converted to a second wave, slightly shifted in frequency. This wave is known to propagate in the backward direction to the incoming photons, and is called back-scattered Stokes wave. The process of frequency shift, which is also called the Brillouin shift, comes from the Doppler effect. The incident coherent pump light generates an acoustic wave in the optical fiber through the process of electrostriction, which causes an index grating to form in the fiber due to the longitudinal nature of the acoustic wave. This induced grating scatters the pump wave by Bragg reflection via the elasto-optic phenomenon, generating the Stokes wave and producing the attenuation of the pump and the amplification of the Stokes wave [2, 3]. SBS has been subject of intensive theoretical as well as experimental investigations over the years. In this regard, various techniques have been developed to suppress SBS [47]. Various analyses of SBS have been considered in the past by different researchers. However, recent research has proved that SBS can be utilized for highly desirable applications [813]. The start of SBS is dictated by an input power called SBS threshold [14]. Achieving a low threshold value is of utmost importance in most applications. SBS threshold reduction, through bidirectional pumping methods, in order to quicken the SBS establishment time have also been considered by a number of researchers [1517]. Modeling of SBS has been considered [18] in order to predict the strength of the phenomenon in optical fibers.

In this paper, we report the development, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, a theoretical model that can be used to predict SBS threshold in an optical fiber where Brillouin pump signal is recycled back into the Brillouin gain medium by the use of an optical mirror, thereby acting as a bidirectional pump. We propose a new expression of stimulated Brillouin scattering threshold that depends on fiber length and the degree of reflectivity of an optical mirror. Results obtained from solving our model equations show that SBS threshold is reduced by ≈50% in a 5 km long single mode fiber, thereby validating experimental results obtained in [16].

2. Theoretical model

We start the modeling by referring to the experimental setup given in Fig. 1 [16], and by finding the evolution of the pump power Pp(z)with distance as reported in [1]

zPp(z)=gBPp(z)Ps(z)AeffαPp(z),
where, Ps(z)represents the power of first-order backward scattered Stokes waves. The Brillouin gain coefficient, the attenuation coefficient and the effective core area of the fiber are all represented by gB, α and Aeff, respectively. The change in pump power due to SBS is dependent on the pump power and the backward scattered Stokes wave power as shown in Eq. (1).

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of Brillouin pump power recycling technique [16].

Download Full Size | PDF

Let Ppf(z) represents the Brillouin pump (BP) power coupled into the fiber front end and Ppb(z) represents the recycled BP power coupled into the other fiber end, to account for pumping from the two ends of the fiber. In this case, the pump absorption characteristics from these two directions are assumed to be independent. In the absence of pump power depletion at the threshold, we neglect the first term at the right hand side of Eq. (1) as proposed in [1] and obtain the pump power along the length of the fiber from the two sides,

zPpf(z)=ααcfPpf(z),
zPpb(z)=αPpb(z).
We introduce αcf in Eq. (2a), to represent the loss factor of the circulator between ports 1 and 2 and is defined by αcf=10αc110.

Equations (2a) and (2b) describe the evolution of the initial BP and recycled BP respectively as a function of fiber length. Integrating both sides of Eq. (2a) from the near end of the optical fiber to z, and Eq. (2b) from the far end of the optical fiber to z, we get

Ppf(z)=Ppf(0)eααcfz,
Ppb(z)=Ppb(L)eα(zL),
where Ppb(L)represents the recycled BP power at the far end of the fiber, which relates to the initial BP power at the near end of the fiber by (Ppf(z=L).R), substituting this into Eq. (3b) we get,
Ppb(z)=RPpf(0)eααcfLeα(zL),
where R is the reflectivity of the optical mirror.

The change in the power of the first-order backward scattered Stokes waves at point 2 in Fig. 1, is given as reported in [1,19],

zPsb(z)=gBAeffPpf(z)Psb(z)+αPsb(z).

Substituting Eq. (3a) into Eq. (5) and integrating it in order to find an equation for the first-order Stokes wave power as a function of fiber length

Psb(z)=Psb(L)exp[gBααcfAeffPpf(0)(eααcfLe-ααcfz)α(Lz)].

We need to consider the contribution of the recycled BP power in generating a Stokes wave. Therefore we introduce Psf(z)as the Stokes wave generated by Ppb(z), which propagates in the same direction as Ppf(z), is derived as

zPsf(z)=gBAeffPpb(z)Psf(z)αPsf(z).
Integrating Eq. (7) from the near end of the fiber to z, admits a solution in the form of:

Psf(z)=Psf(0)exp[gBRαAeffPpf(0)(eα((αcf+1)Lz)e-αL(αcf+1))αz].

In this case, Psf(z)propagates in the same direction of Ppf(z) and then it is reflected back from the far end of optical fiber by the optical mirror. This reflected Psf(z) becomes the additional Stokes wave propagating again to the near end of the fiber (z = 0) in the same direction of Psb(z), and hence we have

Psfb(z)=RPsf(L)eα(zL).
Substituting Eq. (8) into Eq. (9), gives:
Psfb(z)=RPsf(0)exp[gBRαAeffPpf(0)(eααcfLe-αL(αcf+1))α(2Lz)].
Finally, the Stokes wave power at output is given by:
Ps(z)=αcb(Psb(z)+Psfb(z)),
where αcb is the loss factor of the circulator between ports 2 and 3.

The most important parameter for characterizing and determining the SBS threshold is the Stokes wave gain parameter, GSBS=Ps(0)/Ps(L). The use of Eq. (11) requiresPpf(0), Psf(0) andPsb(L)at the near end and the far end of the optical fiber. If Psf(0)and Psb(L)are equal to zero, the optical power of the Stokes waves, Psf(z) and Psb(z) are also equal to zero based on Eq. (6) and 10 respectively. This reflects to the fact that these two Stokes waves must start from a seed power. In practice, Psf(0) and Psb(L)are generated by a fictitious Stokes photon from noise or spontaneous Brillouin scattering occurring throughout the fiber length [2]. In the SBS process, this is done by summing all the contributions of each frequency component of energy (hv) and multiplying byGSBS. This is equivalent to injecting a single Stokes photon per longitudinal mode falling within the Brillouin bandwidth at the point where the gain equals the loss of the fiber [2],

Ps(L)=(hv)GSBSdv.

There are various definitions of the SBS threshold in optical fibers. One is based on the condition when the backward scattered Stokes optical power at (z = 0) is equal to the input power. However, SBS threshold power can also be defined as the input power where the backward scattered Stokes optical power is equal to some fraction, of the pump power. One might also identify the SBS Brillouin threshold based on the input pump power at which the backward scattered Stokes optical power becomes equal to the pump power at the fiber length (l) [20]. Then,

Ps(l)=Ppf(l) and Ppf(0)=Pth
By using Eqs. (3a), (11), (12) and (13), we get the SBS threshold for the pump recycling power technique as,
Pth=CAeffgBLeff1,
where,

C=Psb(L)+R(1αL)Psf(0)αAeffαcbgB+αR2LeffPsf(0),
Leff1=eααcfLα, and Leff=1eαLα.

3. Experimental validation

In this paper, both experimental and simulation works using single mode fiber (SMF) as the Brillouin gain media are performed. The experimental work is very critical to validate our mathematical models. There are two configurations studied in this research work; conventional and BP recycling techniques. The conventional technique refers to the configuration which does not have a mirror to reflect the residual BP back into the fiber. Parameters employed in the simulation by using MATLAB software are given in Table 1 . To perform simulation for the conventional technique, we set R and Psf(0) equal to zero.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Parameters used for the simulation work

Figure 2 shows the Stokes wave power dependence of the BP power in the SMF. In Fig. 2, the solid line and squares show the theoretical and experimental results, respectively. For these findings, the BP wavelength is located near 1550 nm.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Stokes wave power with variation in BP power for 5 km long SMF, (a) conventional technique, and (b) recycling pump technique.

Download Full Size | PDF

It could be noted that by increasing the pump power from 0 to 30 mW for SMF, the backward scattered Stokes wave power increases. We consider that the SBS threshold power Pth is the condition where the back-scattered Stokes wave power begins to rise above the spontaneous back-scattered power (when the exponential growth of the Stokes wave due to electrostriction is larger than the linear growth of the Stokes wave due to the thermal acoustic waves). At a low pump power the SBS shows no real gain and is very small and the transmitted power experiences only linear loss due to the loss of the fiber. When this threshold power is reached, the SBS power grows exponentially and the pump power starts to show depletion due to its conversion to the backward scattered Stokes wave. The pump depletion causes the gain of the process, gBPpf, to decrease and so the rate of increase of the backward scattered Stokes wave decreases as the pump power is further increased. Therefore, the value of Pth16 mW by using the conventional technique when the residual BP power is not recycled back into the fiber. Thus, the reduction coefficient in the SBS threshold is nearly ≈50%, by using the pump recycling technique to Pth8 mW. This calculation result of the SBS threshold is evaluated by using Eq. (14). The additional energies provided by the recycling transmitted BP power to the Brillouin gain medium increases the effective fiber length, thus initiating SBS emissions in the forward direction (Psf(z)). The forward Stokes wave is then reflected by the optical mirror (Psfb(z)) and it becomes a probe signal to the initial BP (Ppf(z)). Consquently, the SBS process increases which translates to the additional gain of the scattered Stokes wave power (Psb(z)). The reduction coefficient pattern is similar to our experimental coefficient. Based on the findings, the agreement is very good between theoretical and experimental results.

The simulation results of the backward scattered Stokes wave for different lengths of SMF for conventional and recycling pump techniques have each been compared with the plots obtained from our experimental results, which are shown in Fig. 3 . For the simulation results, the Stokes wave power is calculated in the range of 4.0 and 11.5 mW for conventional and pump power recycling techniques respectively. The increment of Stokes wave power for the proposed technique is due to the additional gain provided by the recycled BP. Physically, this represents a complete conversion of the pump power above the SBS threshold into backward scattered Stokes wave power and represents the saturation of the gain. At high power it can be seen that the transmitted pump power saturates and shows no significant increase with the increment of pump power. Therefore, the maximum power that can be transmitted by an optical fiber is limited by the process of SBS.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Output Stokes wave power distribution at different SMF lengths for 30 mW BP power, (a) conventional technique, and (b) recycling pump technique.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 4 shows the characteristics of SBS threshold power with respect to the fiber length. In this case, the theoretical SBS threshold power is calculated using Eq. (14). The experimental and theoretical results show small discrepancy which indicates a good agreement between those values. For the conventional technique, the SBS threshold power decreases from 15 to 7 mW with the increment of fiber length from 5 to 17 km respectively. On the other hand, the SBS threshold power reduces from 7.5 to 4.5 mW with respect to the variation of fiber length from 5 to 17 km respectively.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Brillouin threshold power at different SMF lengths, (a) conventional technique, and (b) recycling pump technique.

Download Full Size | PDF

Based on these findings, the BP power recycling technique lowers the SBS threshold as the fiber length increases because the interaction length for Brillouin Stokes wave generation is increased. With attenuation loss and reflectivity of the optical mirror taken into account, the backward scattered Stokes intensity distribution in the fiber has a strong dependence on the pump power coupled into the fiber. At high pump power, the Stokes wave grows very quickly near the front of the fiber resulting in a short effective length. At low pump power, the Stokes wave has a slow growth in a backward direction, resulting in a relatively long effective length. We found that with longer fiber lengths in the BP power recycling method, the Brillouin threshold saturates at the input signal power of 4.5 mW. With the use of high reflectivity mirror, the SBS establishment time is significantly shorter, which means less pump power is required. Adding reflectivity reduces the SBS threshold, increases the SBS conversion efficiency, reduces the saturation level for the transmitted pump power and has the same effect as increasing the Brillouin gain.

4. Conclusion

A new theoretical model of Brillouin threshold reduction through BP recycling has been presented. The SBS threshold of different fibers can be estimated by using the derived equations. The modeling results are compared and concur with our experimental results. Typical threshold power for SBS is about 16 mW in a simulation when the BP power is not recycled while for the BP recycling technique, it is found to be 8 mW, at 5 km long SMF. The reduction of SBS threshold for the BP recycling technique is due to the increment of interaction length for Brillouin Stokes wave generation. In a different perspective, the additional energy provided by the reflected Stokes wave from the recycled BP becomes a probe signal that increasingly stimulates the process of SBS. Thus, the SBS threshold is reduced as the result of output Stokes wave power increment.

References and links

1. R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 2nd ed. (New York: Academic Press, 2003).

2. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 4th ed. (New York: Academic Press, 2004).

3. E. L. Buckland and R. W. Boyd, “Measurement of the frequency response of the electrostrictive nonlinearity in optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 22(10), 676–678 (1997). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. M. M. Howerton, W. K. Burns, and G. K. Gopalakrishnan, “SBS suppression using a depolarized source for high power fiber applications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 14(3), 417–422 (1996). [CrossRef]  

5. C. Hänisch, A. Heuer, and R. Menzel, “Threshold reduction of stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) using fiber loop schemes,” Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 73(8), 851–854 (2001). [CrossRef]  

6. T. Sakamoto, T. Matsui, K. Shiraki, and T. Kurashima, “SBS suppressed fiber with hole-assisted structure,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(20), 4401–4406 (2009). [CrossRef]  

7. P. Weßels, P. Adel, M. Auerbach, D. Wandt, and C. Fallnich, “Novel suppression scheme for Brillouin scattering,” Opt. Express 12(19), 4443–4448 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. S. Norcia, S. Tonda-Goldstein, D. Dolfi, J.-P. Huignard, and R. Frey, “Efficient single-mode Brillouin fiber laser for low-noise optical carrier reduction of microwave signals,” Opt. Lett. 28(20), 1888–1890 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. V. P. Kalosha, L. Chen, and X. Bao, “Slow and fast light via SBS in optical fibers for short pulses and broadband pump,” Opt. Express 14(26), 12693–12703 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. F. Ravet, X. Bao, Y. Li, Q. Yu, A. Yale, V. P. Kalosha, and L. Chen, “Signal processing technique for distributed Brillouin sensing at centimeter spatial resolution,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25(11), 3610–3618 (2007). [CrossRef]  

11. A. Minardo, R. Bernini, and L. Zeni, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering modeling for high-resolution, time-domain distributed sensing,” Opt. Express 15(16), 10397–10407 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. M. H. Al-Mansoori and M. A. Mahdi, “Multiwavelength L-band Brillouin–Erbium comb fiber laser utilizing nonlinear amplifying loop mirror,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(22), 5038–5044 (2009). [CrossRef]  

13. Y. G. Shee, M. A. Mahdi, M. H. Al-Mansoori, S. Yaakob, R. Mohamed, A. K. Zamzuri, A. Man, A. Ismail, and S. Hitam, “All-optical generation of a 21 GHz microwave carrier by incorporating a double-Brillouin frequency shifter,” Opt. Lett. 35(9), 1461–1463 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. A. Kobyakov, S. Kumar, D. Q. Chowdhury, A. B. Ruffin, M. Sauer, S. R. Bickham, and R. Mishra, “Design concept for optical fibers with enhanced SBS threshold,” Opt. Express 13(14), 5338–5346 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. K. Inoue, “Brillouin threshold in an optical fiber with bidirectional pump lights,” Opt. Commun. 120(1-2), 34–38 (1995). [CrossRef]  

16. M. Ajiya, M. A. Mahdi, M. H. Al-Mansoori, Y. G. Shee, S. Hitam, and M. Mokhtar, “Reduction of stimulated Brillouin scattering threshold through pump recycling technique,” Laser Phys. Lett. 6(7), 535–538 (2009). [CrossRef]  

17. Y. G. Shee, M. A. Mahdi, M. H. Al-Mansoori, A. Ismail, N. Hambali, A. K. Zamzuri, R. Mohamad, and S. Yaakob, “Threshold reduction of stimulated Brillouin scattering in photonic crystal fiber,” Laser Phys. 19(12), 2194–2196 (2009). [CrossRef]  

18. A. H. McCurdy, “Modeling of stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers with arbitrary radial index profile,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23(11), 3509–3516 (2005). [CrossRef]  

19. J. Shi, X. Chen, M. Ouyang, J. Liu, and D. Liu, “Theoretical investigation on the threshold value of stimulated Brillouin scattering in terms of laser intensity,” Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 95(4), 657–660 (2009). [CrossRef]  

20. C. A. S. De Oliveira, C. K. Jen, and C. A. S. de Oliveira, “Effects of Bragg diffraction on stimulated backward Brillouin scattering,” Electron. Lett. 27(9), 780–781 (1991). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of Brillouin pump power recycling technique [16].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Stokes wave power with variation in BP power for 5 km long SMF, (a) conventional technique, and (b) recycling pump technique.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Output Stokes wave power distribution at different SMF lengths for 30 mW BP power, (a) conventional technique, and (b) recycling pump technique.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Brillouin threshold power at different SMF lengths, (a) conventional technique, and (b) recycling pump technique.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Parameters used for the simulation work

Equations (20)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

z P p ( z ) = g B P p ( z ) P s ( z ) A e f f α P p ( z ) ,
z P p f ( z ) = α α c f P p f ( z ) ,
z P p b ( z ) = α P p b ( z ) .
P p f ( z ) = P p f ( 0 ) e α α c f z ,
P p b ( z ) = P p b ( L ) e α ( z L ) ,
P p b ( z ) = R P p f ( 0 ) e α α c f L e α ( z L ) ,
z P s b ( z ) = g B A e f f P p f ( z ) P s b ( z ) + α P s b ( z ) .
P s b ( z ) = P s b ( L ) exp [ g B α α c f A e f f P p f ( 0 ) ( e α α c f L e - α α cf z ) α ( L z ) ] .
z P s f ( z ) = g B A e f f P p b ( z ) P s f ( z ) α P s f ( z ) .
P s f ( z ) = P s f ( 0 ) exp [ g B R α A e f f P p f ( 0 ) ( e α (( α c f + 1 ) L z ) e - α L ( α cf + 1 ) ) α z ] .
P s f b ( z ) = R P s f ( L ) e α ( z L ) .
P s f b ( z ) = R P s f ( 0 ) exp [ g B R α A e f f P p f ( 0 ) ( e α α c f L e - α L ( α c f + 1 ) ) α ( 2 L z ) ] .
P s ( z ) = α c b ( P s b ( z ) + P s f b ( z ) ) ,
P s ( L ) = ( h v ) G S B S d v .
P s ( l ) = P p f ( l )
P p f ( 0 ) = P t h
P t h = C A e f f g B L e f f 1 ,
C = P s b ( L ) + R ( 1 α L ) P s f ( 0 ) α A eff α c b g B + α R 2 L e f f P s f ( 0 ) ,
L e f f 1 = e α α c f L α
L e f f = 1 e α L α .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.