Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Incoherent optical frequency domain reflectometry based on a Kerr phase-interrogator

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We present a novel approach for incoherent optical frequency-domain reflectometry based on a frequency-swept sinusoidal optical signal and a Kerr phase-interrogator. The novel approach eliminates dependence on the laser coherence-length allowing for long-range operation. Long-range detection of reflection points as far as 151 km at a spatial-resolution of 11.2 cm is experimentally demonstrated.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Optical frequency-domain reflectometry (OFDR) is one of the most popular approaches for high-resolution fault allocation [1], optical fiber component characterization [14], and distributed temperature and strain sensing [5]. Coherent optical frequency domain reflectometry (C-OFDR) utilizes a tunable laser and an interferometer to superpose a swept-laser signal with a time-delayed version of the same signal leading to a beat [1]. Spectral analysis of the beat signal allows for the location of reflection points along a laser path at high spatial-resolution and high dynamic-range [1, 2, 6]. The utilization of an interferometer makes C-OFDR highly dependent of the laser coherence properties limiting the range of reflection detection [1].

Several approaches have been used for range extension in C-OFDR. Utilization of a highly-coherent swept-laser implemented using a narrow linewidth fiber laser and a piezoelectric tuner has allowed for the location of Fresnel reflection from the end of a 95 km long fiber at an unspecified spatial-resolution [7]. Phase-noise-compensation has allowed for the location of reflection points as far as 80 km at a spatial-resolution of 20 cm [8]. Band-width division has been combined with phase-noise-compensation to locate reflections as far as 40 km at an improved spatial-resolution of 5 cm [9]. Most recent, phase-noise measurement for a swept-laser reflected from points beyond the laser coherence length has allowed the location of Fresnel reflections as far as 170 km at a spatial resolution of 200 m [10].

Incoherent optical frequency domain reflectometry (I-OFDR) has been investigated as an alternative for C-OFDR because it intrinsically allows for long-range reflection measurements [1113]. In I-OFDR, the beat between a frequency-swept sinusoidal optical signal and a time-delayed version of the same signal determines the location of reflection points along the signal path. Existing implementations of I-OFDR utilize opto-electronic components and electronic signal processors for beat acquisition. Unfortunately, the bandwidth cap of electronic and opto-electronic devices limits the maximum sweep frequency-span and the minimum achievable spatial-resolution. The bandwidth cap can be eliminated by development of an all-optical approach for beat acquisition. The Kerr phase-interrogator presented in [14] can be utilized for all-optical beat acquisition which will potentially allow for long-range I-OFDR at micron-level spatial-resolution.

In this paper, we present a novel approach for I-OFDR based on Kerr phase-interrogator. The I-OFDR setup based on a Kerr phase-interrogator and frequency-swept sinusoidal optical signal is presented first. Theoretical analysis shows that the output of the Kerr phase-interrogator corresponds to the beat of the powers of orthogonally-polarized frequency-swept sinusoidal optical signals. Utilization of the novel I-OFDR approach for the location of reflection points on a fiber is experimentally demonstrated.

2. Experimental setup

Figure 1(a) shows the Kerr phase-interrogator configured for optical frequency domain reflectometry. A continuous-wave (CW) laser (Agilent 81980A), illustrated in Fig. 1(b), is amplitude-modulated using an electro-optic modulator (EO-Space) and a sinusoidal electrical signal generator (HP 83752A) with a time-varying frequency fm (t) = 0.5 (f0 + ρt). The output of the modulator is a sinusoidal optical signal with a frequency fs (t) = f0 + ρt, and the optical spectrum of this sinusoidal signal is composed of two distinct peaks with time-varying separation Δν = fs (t) where ν is the optical frequency, as illustrated in Fig. 1(c). The power of the sinusoidal signal is split using a fiber-coupled polarization beam splitter with polarization maintaining fiber ports into a sensor path and a reference path corresponding to the parallel and perpendicular components, respectively. A circulator connects the a fiber under test (FUT) that is terminated with a reflector to the sensor path. The signals from the reference and the sensor paths are recombined using fiber-coupled polarization beam combiner with polarization maintaining fiber ports. Figure 1(d) illustrates the spectrum and the time-trace of the combined signal at the output of the fiber polarization combiner.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schematic of (a) the I-OFDR setup based on a Kerr phase-interrogator, and illustrations of the spectrum and the power trace of (b) the CW laser signal, (c) the sinusoidal laser signal, (d) the combined reference and reflected sinusoidal signals, (e) the phase-modulated sinusoidal signal, and (f) the filtered side-band. RF: radio-frequency; CW: continuous-wave; EOM: electro-optic modulator; FUT: fiber under test; FPS: fiber polarization splitter; FPC: fiber polarization combiner; EDFA: Erbium-doped fiber amplifier; PD: photo-diode.

Download Full Size | PDF

The parallel and perpendicular components at the output of the polarization beam combiner are given by A=Pp/2cos(πfreft+ϕ), A=Pp/2cos(πfsent+ϕ), where ϕ = πfreft, ϕ = πfsent, fref = f0 + ρ (tt), and fsen = f0 + ρ (tt) with t and t being the delay-times required for the sinusoidal signal to travel the reference and the sensor paths, respectively. The combined signal at the output of the fiber polarization combiner is amplified using an Erbium-doped fiber amplifier (Amonics AEDFA-33-B-FA) and then launched into a 4 km long fiber with low chromatic dispersion D = 3 ps/nm-km, which serves as a nonlinear Kerr medium. The amplitudes of the perpendicular and the parallel field components at the output of the Kerr medium become

A=Pp/2cos(πfreft+ϕ)exp[jγP(t)L],
A=Pp/2cos(πfsent+ϕ)exp[jγP(t)L],
where γ, L are the waveguide nonlinearity and the length of the Kerr medium, respectively, and P(t) = |A|2 + |A|2 is the combined power given by
P(t)=Pp/2[cos2(πfreft+ϕ)+cos2(πfsent+ϕ)].

The Kerr-induced sinusoidal phase modulation of A and A leads to the formation of distinct sidebands Pi with i = 1, 2, 3,..., as illustrated in Fig. 1(e). The ratio of P1 (t) to P0 (t) is obtained analytically by applying the Jacobi–Anger expansion to Eqs. (1)(2) [1416] leading to

P1(t)P0(t)=J12[(ϕSPM/2)cos(πfdt+ϕΔ)]+J22[(ϕSPM/2)cos(πfdt+ϕΔ)]J02[(ϕSPM/2)cos(πfdt+ϕΔ)]+J12[(ϕSPM/2)cos(πfdt+ϕΔ)],
where ϕSPM = γPpL is the maximum nonlinear-phase accumulated in the Kerr medium, ϕΔ = ϕϕ = πfdtπ(freffd) td, fd = freffsen = ρtd, and td = tt. Utilization of the multiplication theorem for Bessel functions as described in [14] leads to
P1(t)=P1maxcos2(πfdt+ϕΔ),
where P1max is the maximum value that P1 attains. Eq. (5) shows that the output of the Kerr phase-interrogator corresponds to the beat of of the powers of two orthogonally polarized sinusoidal optical signals that oscillate at two different frequencies freffsen. This beat depends only on the powers of the sinusoidal optical signals allowing for I-OFDR implementation. For the special case fref = fsen, Eq. (5) reduces to P1=P1maxcos2(ϕΔ)=P1maxcos2(πfreftd) which is identical to the relation derived in [14]. A band-pass filter (TeraXion TFC 3 GHz bandwidth) with a center frequency at (ν0+1.5(fsmax+fsmin)/2), where ν0 = c/λ0, is placed at the output of the Kerr medium and is followed by a photo-detector (New-Focus 1811) that is connected to an oscilloscope (Agilent DSO81204B) to obtain a time-trace of P1 (t).

3. Experimental results

A CW laser with a wavelength λ0 = 1550.202 nm is amplitude-modulated using a Mach-Zehnder modulator and a sinusoidal electrical signal generator to obtain a sinusoidal optical signal with a frequency varying linearly from fsmin=18.5 GHz to fsmax=19.5 GHz over a duration of 50 ms leading to ρ = 20 GHz/s. The FUT has a length of 2.2 km and is terminated with an ultra-polished connector (UPC) to induce Fresnel back reflection. Figure 2(a) presents the measured value of P1 (t) at the oscilloscope, and Fig. 2(b) presents a magnified section of P1 (t) showing a sinusoidal variation with time in agreement with Eq. (5). The spectrum of P1 (t) is calculated using | {P1 (t)}|2, where is the Fourier transform operator, and then the frequency f is replaced by the distance d = fc/2ρng, where c is the speed of light and ng = 1.46 is the group refractive index of the FUT, to obtain the relative reflectivity as a function of distance, as shown in Fig. 2(c). The signal P1 (t) is zero-padded to increase the frequency resolution of the Fourier transform allowing for the determination of the spatial-resolution Δd3dB = 9.3 cm, as shown in Fig. 2(d).

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) Measured P1 (t), (b) magnified section of P1 (t), (c) relative reflectivity as a function of distance in the fiber under test, and (d) magnified section of the reflection at dpeak = 2272.49278 m.

Download Full Size | PDF

Similar to existing implementations of I-OFDR, the novel approach allows for the detection of multiple reflection points. Figure 3(a) presents the measured reflectivity as a function of distance for a combination of two fibers connected using non-matching fiber connectors, a UPC connector and an angle-polished connector (APC), to induce strong back-reflection at the interface between the two fibers. Reflection peaks are observed at d = 2.2725 km and d = 6.6480 km corresponding to the locations of end-facets of the first and the second fibers. Furthermore, the novel approach can detect reflection points on hundreds of kilometers of fiber. Figure 3(c) presents the measured reflection at the end of 151 km long fiber obtained with ρ = 4 GHz/s. An erbium doped fiber amplifier is used for amplification of the signal reflected from the end of the 151 km long fiber to compensate for the attenuation induced by traveling along the fiber.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) Relative reflectivity for two concatenated fibers, (b) magnified image of the peak at dpeak = 6.6480 km, (c) relative reflectivity for a 151 km long fiber, and (d) reflection peaks at the end of the 151 km fiber (solid curve) and at the end of a 37.4 cm fiber cord connected to the 151 km fiber (dashed curve).

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Spatial-resolution

The frequency corresponding to a reflection point located at distance d is given by f = 2ρdng/c leading to a spatial resolution Δd = Δfc/2ρng. The spectrum of the measured time-trace P1 (t) is a squared sinc function for which the 3 dB frequency resolution is calculated from the measured time-trace interval tspan using Δf3dB = 0.88/tspan leading to Δd3dB = 0.88c/2ρngtspan. Using ρ = 20 GHz/s, ng = 1.46, and tspan = 50 ms leads to Δd3dB = 9.04 cm in close agreement of the measured values at Δd3dB = 9.3 cm at d = 2.2725 km and Δd3dB = 9.4 cm at d = 6.6480 km, as shown in Fig. 2(d) and Fig. 3(b), respectively. To further investigate the spatial-resolution, Fig. 3(d) presents the reflection peak at the end of the 151 km fiber and the peak that results after connecting a 37.4 cm fiber cord at the 151 km fiber end. The 3 dB spatial-resolution for the peak at d = 151.2952 km is Δd3dB = 11.2 cm showing that the spatial-resolution is maintained over long distances. Furthermore, the reflection peaks in Fig. 3(d) are clearly distinguishable and are separated by 38.5 cm in close agreement with the length of the fiber cord.

The sweep frequency-span in the presented experiments is fspan=fsmaxfsmin=ρtspan=1.0 GHz. Utilization of wide-bandwidth electro-optic modulators and sinusoidal electrical signal generators can increase fspan up-to ∼ 100.0 GHz allowing for Δd3dB ∼ 0.9 mm. Furthermore, the presented approach for I-OFDR utilizes all-optical signal processing which eliminates the electronic bandwidth limitation in existing I-OFDR implementations. A frequency-swept sinusoidal optical signal with fspan > 1.0 THz can be generated by superposition of a continuous-wave laser and a swept-laser allowing for micron-level spatial-resolution Δd3dB < 90 μm.

5. Dynamic-range

The measured signal is given by P1meas(t)=[P1ideal(t)+ν(t)]×rect(t) where P1ideal(t) is the ideal signal, ν(t) is the noise, and rect(t) is a square pulse with a duration tspan. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of P1meas(t) can be increased by using a highly-nonlinear chalcogenide fiber as a Kerr medium to induce nonlinear Kerr effects at lower signal powers eliminating the need for optical amplifiers that generate noise through amplified spontaneous emission. The SNR can also be increased by using low-noise photo-diodes to reduce dark-current noise and shot-noise such that P1ideal(t)ν(t). Finally, the SNR penalty induced by the finite measurement duration tspan is obtained from the normalized spectrum of rect (t) given by sin2 (πftspan) / (πftspan)2. Increasing the sweep frequency-span N times increases tspan by a factor N, and consequently, reduces the SNR penalty of rect(t) by a factor N2.

Similar to C-OFDR, the power of the reflected signal must be weak in the presence of multiple reflectors to prevent the generation of artificial peaks that arise from mixing of the frequencies corresponding to actual reflection peaks. Unfortunately, the dynamic-range is reduced when the signal from the sensor path is weaker than the signal from the reference path. Enhancement of the dynamic-range is essential for the detection of Rayleigh back-scattering in the FUT allowing for distributed sensing of strain and temperature [5, 17]. Future work will focus on enhancement of the dynamic-range for the implementation of distributed temperature and strain sensors.

6. Conclusion

We present a novel approach for incoherent optical frequency domain reflectometry based on a Kerr phase-interrogator. Reflections measurement as far as 151 km at a spatial-resolution of 11.2 cm has been experimentally demonstrated. The novel approach for I-OFDR utilizes all-optical signal processing to obtain the beat between two frequency-swept sinusoidal optical signals. This approach will enable processing a wide sweep frequency-span for long range detection of reflection points at micron level spatial-resolution.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the NSERC Discovery Grant and Canada Research Chair Program (CRC in Fiber Optics and Photonics).

References

1. W. Eickhoff and R. Ulrich, “Optical frequency domain reflectometry in single-mode fiber,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 693–695 (1981). [CrossRef]  

2. H. Barfuss and E. Brinkmeyer, “Modified optical frequency domain reflectometry with high spatial resolution for components of integrated optic systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 7, 3–10 (1989). [CrossRef]  

3. U. Glombitza and E. Brinkmeyer, “Coherent frequency-domain reflectometry for characterization of single-mode integrated-optical waveguides,” J. Lightwave Technol. 11, 1377–1384 (1993). [CrossRef]  

4. J. P. Von der Weid, R. Passy, G. Mussi, and N. Gisin, “On the characterization of optical fiber network components with optical frequency domain reflectometry,” J. Lightwave Technol. 15, 1131–1141 (1997). [CrossRef]  

5. M. Froggatt and J. Moore, “High-spatial-resolution distributed strain measurement in optical fiber with rayleigh scatter,” Appl. Opt. 37, 1735–1740 (1998). [CrossRef]  

6. G. Mussi, N. Gisin, R. Passy, and J. P. vonderWeid, “−152.5 dB sensitivity high dynamic-range optical frequency-domain reflectometry,” Electron. Lett. 32, 926–927 (1996). [CrossRef]  

7. J. Geng, C. Spiegelberg, and S. Jiang, “Narrow linewidth fiber laser for 100-km optical frequency domain reflectometry,” Photonics Tech. Lett. 17, 1827–1829 (2005). [CrossRef]  

8. X. Fan, Y. Koshikiya, N. Araki, and F. Ito, “Field trials of PNC-OFDR in different environments for detecting short beat lengths,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24, 1288–1291 (2012). [CrossRef]  

9. X. Fan, Y. Koshikiya, and F. Ito, “Centimeter-level spatial resolution over 40 km realized by bandwidth-division phase-noise-compensated ofdr,” Opt. Express 19, 19122–19128 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. Z. Ding, X. S. Yao, T. Liu, Y. Du, K. Liu, Q. Han, Z. Meng, J. Jiang, and H. Chen, “Long measurement range ofdr beyond laser coherence length,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 25, 202–205 (2013). [CrossRef]  

11. R. I. MacDonald, “Frequency domain optical reflectometer,” Appl. Opt. 20, 1840–1844 (1981). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. S. Venkatesh and D. W. Dolfi, “Incoherent frequency modulated cw optical reflectometry with centimeter resolution,” Appl. Opt. 29, 1323–1326 (1990). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. B. Schlemmer, “A simple and very effective method with improved sensitivity for fault location in optical fibers,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 3, 1037–1039 (1991). [CrossRef]  

14. C. Baker and X. Bao, “Displacement sensor based on kerr induced phase-modulation of orthogonally polarized sinusoidal optical signals,” Opt. Express 22, 9095–9100 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. A. Boskovic, S. V. Chernikov, J. R. Taylor, L. Gruner-Nielsen, and O. A. Levring, “Direct continuous-wave measurement of n2 in various types of telecommunication fiber at 1.55 μm,” Opt. Lett. 21, 1966–1968 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. M. Rochette, C. Baker, and R. Ahmad, “All-optical polarization-mode dispersion monitor for return-to-zero optical signals at 40 gbits/s and beyond,” Opt. Lett. 35, 3703–3705 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. X. Bao and L. Chen, “Recent progress in distributed fiber optic sensors,” Sensors 12, 8601–8639 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (3)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic of (a) the I-OFDR setup based on a Kerr phase-interrogator, and illustrations of the spectrum and the power trace of (b) the CW laser signal, (c) the sinusoidal laser signal, (d) the combined reference and reflected sinusoidal signals, (e) the phase-modulated sinusoidal signal, and (f) the filtered side-band. RF: radio-frequency; CW: continuous-wave; EOM: electro-optic modulator; FUT: fiber under test; FPS: fiber polarization splitter; FPC: fiber polarization combiner; EDFA: Erbium-doped fiber amplifier; PD: photo-diode.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) Measured P1 (t), (b) magnified section of P1 (t), (c) relative reflectivity as a function of distance in the fiber under test, and (d) magnified section of the reflection at dpeak = 2272.49278 m.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Relative reflectivity for two concatenated fibers, (b) magnified image of the peak at dpeak = 6.6480 km, (c) relative reflectivity for a 151 km long fiber, and (d) reflection peaks at the end of the 151 km fiber (solid curve) and at the end of a 37.4 cm fiber cord connected to the 151 km fiber (dashed curve).

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

A = P p / 2 cos ( π f r e f t + ϕ ) exp [ j γ P ( t ) L ] ,
A = P p / 2 cos ( π f s e n t + ϕ ) exp [ j γ P ( t ) L ] ,
P ( t ) = P p / 2 [ cos 2 ( π f ref t + ϕ ) + cos 2 ( π f sen t + ϕ ) ] .
P 1 ( t ) P 0 ( t ) = J 1 2 [ ( ϕ SPM / 2 ) cos ( π f d t + ϕ Δ ) ] + J 2 2 [ ( ϕ SPM / 2 ) cos ( π f d t + ϕ Δ ) ] J 0 2 [ ( ϕ SPM / 2 ) cos ( π f d t + ϕ Δ ) ] + J 1 2 [ ( ϕ SPM / 2 ) cos ( π f d t + ϕ Δ ) ] ,
P 1 ( t ) = P 1 max cos 2 ( π f d t + ϕ Δ ) ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.