Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

240 kW peak power at 266 nm in nonlinear YAl3(BO3)4 single crystal

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We report the fourth harmonic generation at 266 nm using a type I YAl3(BO3)4 (YAB) single crystal from a Q-switch microchip laser Nd:YAG/Cr4+:YAG frequency doubled with a LiB3O5 (LBO) crystal. 240 kW peak power at 266 nm corresponding to a mean conversion efficiency of 12.2% from 532 to 266 nm has been obtained with a 2.94 mm thick YAB crystal. The influences of optical homogeneity and absorption on the conversion efficiency are discussed.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

UV solid-state lasers emitting at 266 nm are used in various applications such as microelectronics, precise cutting of some materials (polymer, glasses) which only absorb below 300 nm, mass spectrometry etc. Such UV solid-state devices can be achieved from an infrared fundamental laser light through several stages of frequency conversion using nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals. Borate crystals are often chosen because of their wide transparency in visible and UV range, their good chemical stability and their high damage threshold [1]. Nevertheless, materials which are transparent at 266 nm, which have a phase matching angle for SHG of the 532 nm fundamental wavelenght, and which possess a high conversion efficiency are less numerous. Two main nonlinear crystals are currently commercially available for the fourth harmonic generation (FHG) at 266 nm: β-BaB2O4 (BBO) and CsLiB6O10 (CLBO). Although these crystals demonstrate good performances for UV generation at 266 nm [2–4], they present some practical drawbacks which limit their application as high hygroscopy for CLBO and large walk-off angle as well as high two-photon absorption for normal BBO [5]. Until recently, YAl3(BO3)4 (YAB) single crystal, which is a negative uniaxial crystal and belongs to space group R32, was only studied doped by rare earth ions as Nd3+ and Yb3+ for self-doubling application at 532 nm. The growth of YAB by Top Seeded Solution Growth (TSSG) using flux based on K2Mo3O10 did not allow obtaining transparent crystals below 300 nm. Since 2008, undoped YAB arouse a renewed interest as a nonlinear crystal for applications below 300 nm thanks to the use of new flux (Li2WO4-B2O3 [6], Li2O-B2O3 [7] and Li2O-Al2O3-B2O3 [8]). YAB is a promising nonlinear material because of similar nonlinear properties to CLBO [9], a relative high hardness and chemical stability (non-hygroscopic) which make it easy to cut and polish [10]. So far, only two experimental reports on the use of YAB as NLO crystal for 266 nm generation were published [7,9]. Q. Liu et al [9] obtained 5.05 W average power of a 266 nm UV laser at 65 kHz pulse repetition frequency and 19.5 ns pulse width by performing type I SHG in a YAB single crystal of dimensions 3 x 3 x 6 mm3. They obtained a pulse peak power of 4 kW and a conversion efficiency of 12.3% from 532 to 266 nm.

In this paper, we report the fourth harmonic generation of microchip laser Nd:YAG/Cr4+: YAG by performing type I SHG in a YAB single crystal. The fundamental wavelength at 1064 nm was first doubled in frequency at 532 nm with a LBO crystal of dimensions 5 x 5 x 10 mm3. The optical transmittance of the YAB crystal over the range 180-1200 nm as well as the optical conversion efficiency from 532 to 266 nm were measured. The influences of optical homogeneity and absorption of YAB on the conversion efficiency are discussed.

2. Crystal characterization

A YAB single crystal was grown using the top seeded solution growth (TSSG) method with La2O3-B2O3 as a flux [11]. A YAB slab of dimensions 15 x 15 x 2.94 mm3 (Fig. 1) was cut in ZX plane with θ = 66.9 ° and φ = 0° for type I SHG leading to 266 nm generation according to the Sellmeier equations determined by J. Yu et al [8]. The value of the effective nonlinear coefficient deff is 0.69 pm/V with d11 = 1.7 pm/V [10]. The crystal was optically polished but uncoated. A large section of 15 x 15 mm2 has been chosen for probing in order to evaluate the homogeneity of the crystal. The moderate thickness of the crystal (2.94 mm) is limited by the absorption at 266 nm (see below).

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Photograph of the polished slab of YAB single crystal cut in the XZ plane (θ = 66.9°, φ = 0°).

Download Full Size | PDF

The crystal transmittance through a 2.94 mm thick slab cut and polished for FHG was measured over the range 180-1200 nm at room temperature using unpolarized light with a Cary 6000i UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (spectral bandwidth (SBW) is 2 nm). We can observe on the transmittance spectrum (Fig. 2) two weak absorption bands (1, 2) in the visible region at λ1 = 585 nm, λ2 = 415 nm and two strong absorption bands (3, 4) in the UV region at λ3 = 285 nm and λ4 = 245 nm. Because of the strong absorption in UV, the transmittance drops sharply from T = 81% at 338 nm to T = 38% at 266 nm. Considering the optical loss by reflection calculated using Sellmeier equations [8], the absorption of the crystal at 266 nm is 55% corresponding to an absorption coefficient of 2.7 cm−1. Normally, the cut-off wavelength is about 170 nm [7] but it is 200 nm in this study because of the absorption and the thickness of the sample.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Transmittance at room temperature with unpolarized light of a 2.94 mm thick type I YAB single crystal (θ = 66.9 °, φ = 0°).

Download Full Size | PDF

The absorption bands result from the presence of transition metal impurities in the crystal and more precisely from chromium Cr3+ and iron Fe3+, which can come from the raw materials and even from the platinum crucible. Fe3+ and Cr3+ ions can easily substitute Al3+ which is 6-fold coordinated in YAB. The two absorption bands in the visible (1, 2) are characteristic of Cr3+ ion (Fig. 2) and correspond respectively to d-d transitions: A42gT42g and A42gT41g [12]. The two strong absorption bands (3, 4) at 285 nm and 245 nm are assigned to charge transfer transitions between O2- and Fe3+. They are similar to the ones observed in YAB crystals grown in air using other flux (Li2O – B2O3 [7], Li2O – B2O3 – Al2O3 [8]). A similar phenomenon was also observed in others crystals as BaAlBO3F2 (BABF) [13] and especially in K2Al2B2O7 (KABO) where the UV absorption is consistent with a charge transfer between the surrounding ligands O2- and Fe3+ [14].

3. Experimental set-up and laser beams characteristics

The fundamental wavelength at 1064 nm is produced by an amplified diode pumped passively [110]-cut Cr4+:YAG Q-switched microchip Nd:YAG laser (100Hz rep. rate). The pulse duration is 580 ps with a maximum energy of 1.7 mJ which corresponds to a maximum peak power of 3 MW [15].

The experimental setup used for the fourth harmonic generation with YAB crystal is presented in Fig. 3. A type I LBO crystal, cut in the XY plan (θ = 90°, φ = 11.3°) with dimensions of 5 x 5 x 10 mm3 was used as frequency doubling material to generate the 532 nm laser beam. The choice of LBO for this first stage of conversion is explained by its high crystalline quality and both high angular acceptance (7.4 mrad.cm) [16] and good nonlinear effective coefficient (0.83 pm/V) [17]. Two half-wave plates (λ/2) and a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) are used to control the power and the polarization of the infrared beam which is focused in the LBO crystal through a lens of focal length f1 = 175 mm. The waist of IR laser beam in LBO crystal is 350 μm. An energy of 0.9 mJ at 532 nm with 530 ps pulse width corresponding to a mean conversion efficiency of 53% (energy ratio) was obtained.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Experimental setup for fourth harmonic generation with YAB crystal.

Download Full Size | PDF

Then, two dichroic mirrors M1 coated for HR at 532 nm and HT at 1064 nm are used to filter the residual 1064 nm beam. A silica window (S) was used to take off a part of the beam in order to measure precisely the input energy at 532 nm which value is varied thanks to the use of half wave plate at 532 nm and PBS. The green beam is then focused in the YAB crystal through a lens of focal f2 = 150 mm. The beam quality M2 and the waist of the green beam were measured by the knife-edge method and were calculated to be 1.2 and 115 μm respectively (Fig. 4). The UV beam and the residual 532 nm beam are respectively transmitted and reflected to power meters thanks to the dichroic mirror M2 coated for HR at 266 nm and HT at 532 nm. The confocal length (2 x Rayleigh range) is 13.3 cm, so we can consider that for the YAB crystal, the input beam is almost parallel. Knowing that the walk-off of YAB for second harmonic generation of 532 to 266 is 33 mrad [17], the interaction length LC,which is the maximum length before the beams of the interacting fields separate, can be calculated as follows:

LC=w0πρ
where w0 is the waist of the green beam and ρis the walk-off of YAB. LCis 6.2 mm, which is much longer than the length of the crystal (2.94 mm). The walk-off effects are so negligible.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 M2 and waist measurements for the laser beam at 532 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Fourth harmonic generation at 266 nm

Measurements of conversion efficiency from 532 nm to 266 nm have revealed significates inhomogeneities in YAB crystals. Some areas in the crystal scatter the laser beam. As we can see from Fig. 5, the quality of the UV beam is variable depending on the position in the crystal where we do the measurement. Moreover, for each position in the crystal, the orientation of the crystal has to be modified in order to maximize the UV energy. Twins which have been already observed in YAB crystals [18–20] could be responsible for these effects. Fourth harmonic generation experiments were, therefore, performed in positions where losses by scattering were negligible.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Photographs of two UV beams at 266 nm taken in two different positions in the crystal.

Download Full Size | PDF

The conversion efficiency from 532 nm to 266 nm and output energy at 266 nm versus input energy and intensity at 532 nm were measured. The results are shown in Fig. 6. Considering the losses by reflection of the crystal at 532 nm and 266 nm, an energy of 113 μJ at 266 nm with 445 ps (Fig. 7) pulse width corresponding to a mean conversion efficiency of 12.2% has been obtained. The pulse width was measured by a 12.5 GHz GaAs detector (ET-4000, Electro-Optics Technology, Inc.) and a 12 GHz oscilloscope (DSO 81204B, Agilent Technology). Assuming a Gaussian pulse shape, the pulse peak power Pand the intensity Iat 266 nm can be expressed as follows:

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 Conversion efficiency from 532 nm to 266 nm and output energy at 266 nm versus input energy and intensity at 532 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 Pulse width of UV beam at 266 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

P=0.94Eτ
I=2Pπw02

The pulse peak power is 240 kW. If we assume that UV and green waists are similar, UV intensity is 1.15 GW.cm−2. No damage in YAB crystal was observed for this test.

5. Discussion

The results shown above highlighted a substantial loss of energyELOSSwhich can be calculated as follows:

ELOSS=E5320E532RE266
where E5320 is the input energy at 532 nm, E532R is the residual energy at 532 nm and E266 is the output energy at 266 nm. ELOSS, E266 and E532R versus E5320 are shown in Fig. 8.

 figure: Fig. 8

Fig. 8 ELOSS, E266 and E532R versus E5320.

Download Full Size | PDF

For example, the maximum obtained energy of 113 μJ at 266 nm corresponds with a loss of energy of 317 μJ. This loss of energy can have multiple origins:

  • Scattering
  • Linear absorption at 532 nm
  • Linear absorption at 266 nm
  • Two-photon absorption at 266 nm
  • Two photon absorption at 532 nm
  • Absorption of one photon at 532 nm and one photon at 266 nm

Losses by scattering can be neglected because the experiment was performed at a position where the scattering was very low. Linear absorption at 532 nm is also negligible because of the low linear absorption coefficient (α532 = 0.069 cm−1). These two latter assumptions were checked by rotating the polarization of 532 nm laser beam by 90°. In this situation, there is no phase matching and no 266 nm generated beam. Then, we checked that ELOSS=E5320E532R0.Two-photon absorption (TPA) is a nonlinear phenomenon which is characterized by the coefficient β(cm.GW−1) in the following equation:

dIdz=αIβI2
where I is the light intensity, αthe linear absorption coefficient, β the two-photon absorption coefficient and z the direction of propagation. β is often determined by measuring the transmittance (T=E(λ)/E0(λ)) versus the intensity at the UV wavelength λ where E(λ) and E0(λ) are respectively the output and input energies. TPA is characterized by a nonlinear decrease of the transmittance when intensity is increased. Moreover, TPA is dependent on the energy band gap of the material [21] (the closer the UV cut-off edge of the material to λ, the more losses by TPA). The absorption of two photons at 532 nm of YAB was studied by turning the polarization of 90°. As mentioned above, the TPA at 532 nm in YAB is negligible because the transmittance of the sample remains constant whatever the green intensity when turning the polarization of light to avoid phase matching. Concerning the TPA of one photon at 532 nm and one photon at 266, it could not be measured.

It is highly likely, therefore, that linear absorption at 266 nm and absorption of two photons at 266 are mostly responsible for the energy loss. Indeed, the linear absorption at 266 nm is about 55% (Fig. 2) so that we can assume that most of the energy loss comes from the linear absorption at 266 nm. Regarding the TPA at 266 nm, it could not be measured directly. Nevertheless, the plot of the transmittance T=E266/E266TOTAL where E266TOTAL=E266+ELOSS versus the total intensity at 266 nm is significant of the occurrence of TPA. In our case, the total intensity is the sum of the loss and of the measured intensity at 266 nm. As shown in Fig. 9, the transmittance decreases nonlinearly with increasing total intensity while it should have been constant if no TPA. Moreover, the intensity at 266 nm is in the order of GW.cm−2 where TPA is generally assumed to occur. We can conclude that the energy loss mostly comes from linear absorption at 266 nm but also from TPA at 266 nm. If we assume no linear absorption and no TPA at 266 nm, the conversion efficiency would be 46%.

 figure: Fig. 9

Fig. 9 Intensity-dependent transmittance at 266 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

6. Conclusion

A YAB single crystal was grown using La2O3-B2O3 as a flux. A 2.94 mm thick type I YAB crystal was cut in ZX plane (θ = 66.9°, φ = 0°) for 266 nm generation. The transmittance spectrum reveals two strong absorption bands at 216 nm and 264 nm with an absorption coefficient of 2.7 cm−1 at 266 nm. In spite of this absorption, 240 kW peak power at 266 nm with 445 ps pulse width corresponding to a mean conversion efficiency of 12.2% has been obtained. These results reveal that YAB is a promising NLO crystal for 266 nm generation.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to acknowledge the Airbus Group Foundation for PhD funding (project 088-A009-1006). This work is supported by a public grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) (ANR UV Challenge, 12-B504-0014-01)

References and links

1. P. Becker, “Borate materials in nonlinear optics,” Adv. Mater. 10(13), 979–992 (1998). [CrossRef]  

2. G. Wang, A. Geng, Y. Bo, H. Li, Z. Sun, Y. Bi, D. Cui, Z. Xu, X. Yuan, X. Wang, G. Shen, and D. Shen, “28.4 W 266 nm ultraviolet-beam generation by fourth-harmonic generation of an all-solid-state laser,” Opt. Commun. 259(2), 820–822 (2006). [CrossRef]  

3. R. Bhandari, T. Taira, A. Miyamoto, Y. Furukawa, and T. Tago, “>3 MW peak power at 266 nm using Nd: YAG/Cr4+: YAG microchip laser and fluxless-BBO,” Opt. Mater. Express 2(7), 907–913 (2012). [CrossRef]  

4. Q. Liu, X. P. Yan, X. Fu, M. Gong, and D. S. Wang, “High power all-solid-state fourth harmonic generation of 266 nm at the pulse repetition rate of 100 kHz,” Laser Phys. Lett. 6(3), 203–206 (2009). [CrossRef]  

5. K. Takachiho, M. Yoshimura, Y. Takahashi, M. Imade, T. Sasaki, and Y. Mori, “Ultraviolet laser-induced degradation of CsLiB6O10 and β-BaB2O4,” Opt. Mater. Express 4(3), 559–567 (2014). [CrossRef]  

6. H. Liu, J. Li, S. H. Fang, J. Y. Wang, and N. Ye, “Growth of YAl3(BO3)4 crystals with tungstate based flux,” Mater. Res. Innov 15(2), 102–106 (2011). [CrossRef]  

7. X. Yu, Y. Yue, J. Yao, and Z. Hu, “YAl3(BO3)4: crystal growth and characterization,” J. Cryst. Growth 312(20), 3029–3033 (2010). [CrossRef]  

8. J. Yu, L. Liu, N. Zhai, X. Zhang, G. Wang, X. Wang, and C. Chen, “Crystal growth and optical properties of YAl3(BO3)4 for UV applications,” J. Cryst. Growth 341(1), 61–65 (2012). [CrossRef]  

9. Q. Liu, X. Yan, M. Gong, H. Liu, G. Zhang, and N. Ye, “High-power 266 nm ultraviolet generation in yttrium aluminum borate,” Opt. Lett. 36(14), 2653–2655 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. D. Rytz, A. Gross, S. Vernay, and V. Wesemann, “YAl3(BO3)4: a novel NLO crystal for frequency conversion to UV wavelengths,” Proc. SPIE 6998, 699814 (2008). [CrossRef]  

11. T. Alekel, D. A. Keszler, and N. Ye, “Methods and structure for non-linear optics,” US patent application US2006/0054864 A1.

12. G. Wang, H. G. Gallagher, T. P. J. Han, and B. Henderson, “Crystal growth and optical characterization of Cr3+ - doped YAl3(BO3)4,” J. Cryst. Growth 153(3-4), 169–174 (1995). [CrossRef]  

13. Y. Yue, Z. Hu, Y. Zhou, J. Wang, X. Zhang, C. Chen, and Z. Xu, “Growth and nonlinear optical properties of BaAlBO3F2 crystal,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28(4), 861–866 (2011). [CrossRef]  

14. L. Liu, C. Liu, X. Wang, Z. G. Hu, R. K. Li, and C. T. Chen, “Impact of Fe3+ on UV absorption of K2Al2B2O7 crystals,” Solid State Sci. 11(4), 841–844 (2009). [CrossRef]  

15. H. Sakai, H. Kan, and T. Taira, “>1 MW peak power single-mode high-brightness passively Q-switched Nd 3+:YAG microchip laser,” Opt. Express 16(24), 19891–19899 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. C. Chen, T. Sasaki, R. Li, Y. Wu, Z. Lin, Y. Mori, Z. Hu, J. Wang, S. Uda, M. Yoshimura, and Y. Kaneda, Nonlinear Optical Borate Crystals (Wiley, 2012), Chap. 3.

17. D. A. Roberts, “Simplified characterization of uniaxial and biaxial nonlinear optical crystals: a plea for standardization of nomenclature and conventions,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 28(10), 2057–2074 (1992). [CrossRef]  

18. A. Péter, K. Polgar, and E. Beregi, “Revealing growth defects in non-linear borate single crystals by chemical etching,” J. Cryst. Growth 209(1), 102–109 (2000). [CrossRef]  

19. S. Zhao, J. Wang, D. Sun, X. Hu, and H. Liu, “Twin structure in Yb: YAl3(BO3)4 crystal,” J. Appl. Cryst. 34(5), 661–662 (2001). [CrossRef]  

20. P. Dekker and J. Dawes, “Twinning and “natural quasi-phase matching” in Yb:YAB,” Appl. Phys. B 83(2), 267–271 (2006). [CrossRef]  

21. E. W. Van Stryland, M. A. Woodall, H. Vanherzeele, and M. J. Soileau, “Energy band-gap dependence of two-photon absorption,” Opt. Lett. 10(10), 490–492 (1985). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (9)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Photograph of the polished slab of YAB single crystal cut in the XZ plane (θ = 66.9°, φ = 0°).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Transmittance at room temperature with unpolarized light of a 2.94 mm thick type I YAB single crystal (θ = 66.9 °, φ = 0°).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Experimental setup for fourth harmonic generation with YAB crystal.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 M2 and waist measurements for the laser beam at 532 nm.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Photographs of two UV beams at 266 nm taken in two different positions in the crystal.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Conversion efficiency from 532 nm to 266 nm and output energy at 266 nm versus input energy and intensity at 532 nm.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Pulse width of UV beam at 266 nm.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8 E LOSS , E 266 and E 532 R versus E 532 0 .
Fig. 9
Fig. 9 Intensity-dependent transmittance at 266 nm.

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

L C = w 0 π ρ
P=0.94 E τ
I= 2P π w 0 2
E LOSS = E 532 0 E 532 R E 266
dI dz =αIβ I 2
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.