Open Access
Add to BibSonomyAbstract
We present a setup for complete characterization of femtosecond pulses generated by seeded free-electron lasers (FELs) in the extreme-ultraviolet spectral region. Two delayed and spectrally shifted replicas are produced and used for spectral phase interferometry for direct electric field reconstruction (SPIDER). We show that it can be achieved by a simple arrangement of the seed laser. Temporal shape and phase obtained in FEL simulations are well retrieved by SPIDER reconstructions, allowing to foresee the implementation of this diagnostics tool on existing and future sources. This will be a significant step towards an experimental investigation and control of FEL spectral phase.
© 2015 Optical Society of America
1. Introduction
In recent years, seeded free-electron lasers (FELs) have demonstrated to be very attractive sources for intense light production, revealing improved shot-to-shot stability, tunability, spatial quality and longitudinal coherence [1–3]. Notably, the high-gain harmonic generation (HGHG) scheme [4] enables the generation of powerful and ultrashort extreme-ultraviolet (XUV) pulses. In such a configuration, an external source (the seed) interacts with a relativistic electron beam wiggling in a first undulator chain (the modulator). This interaction leads to an energy modulation of the electrons, further transposed to a spatial bunching after the electrons experience an energy-dependent path into a magnetic chicane, called the dispersive section. The bunched electron beam is then injected into a long undulator chain (the radiator). The bunching has a periodicity determined by the seed frequency but also presents significant components at the harmonics of the latter, so that the electron beam can emit coherently at one of the seed harmonics. In the radiator, the light is amplified at the chosen harmonic until the process reaches saturation, due to bunching deterioration.
In ideal conditions, the spectro-temporal properties of HGHG mimic those of the seed [1], that is usually a Gaussian quasi-monochromatic pulse (e.g., from a Ti:Sapphire laser or an harmonic of the latter). However, due to the possibility of spectral phase distortion during amplification [5], pure spectral characterizations do not allow for inferring the temporal pulse shape, except particular cases [6]. Few techniques have been tested on FELs for directly measuring the temporal profile. They usually rely on photoionization in gaseous targets and remain rather complicated to implement. Most known are autocorrelation [7] and cross-correlation [8]. In their standard layouts, they require a multi-shot scan (implying source stability), in which case they are not suitable for providing pulse analysis in real time and direct interconnection with experiments. In addition, autocorrelation cannot resolve pulse asymmetries. More accurate, terahertz streaking spectroscopy [9] needs, as cross-correlation, an external source. Overall, these three techniques do not lift the uncertainty on the spectral phase, which is a crucial piece of information for a comprehensive pulse characterization required by the users and for a better understanding of FEL dynamics.
Spectral phase interferometry for direct electric field reconstruction (SPIDER) has the potential for obtaining accurate and complete spectro-temporal information [10] on a single shot by means of an inexpensive setup. The technique consists in measuring the spectral interference between the pulse itself and a replica delayed in time and slightly shifted in frequency. A direct inversion procedure of the interferogram yields the electric field of the pulse. The article is structured as follows: first, we propose an experimental layout for carrying out such a measurement on a seeded XUV FEL; then, we study the possibility to provide seed pulses that are suitable for the experiment; next, parameters of the SPIDER setup and of the FEL simulations are given; finally, numerical results are shown and discussed, before concluding.
2. Setup
Though the implementation of a classical SPIDER apparatus remains rather simple at infrared, visible or even deep-ultraviolet wavelengths (at which it has been used on FEL pulses [11]), the issue of creating a replica at shorter wavelengths leads us to reconsider its arrangement, as was done on high order harmonic generation sources [12,13]. Following the successful pump-probe experiments on the FERMI FEL facility [14] that were based on a twin-seeding scheme, we here show that the same setup is suitable for carrying out SPIDER measurements. The arrangement we propose does not require any further implementation and can be non-invasive for users since the on-line spectrometer [15] records the SPIDER interferogram. The layout is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1 Setup for XUV SPIDER on HGHG FEL. The first seed pulse, of central frequency ω0, and its replica, delayed by τ and spectrally shifted by Ω, overlap in space and time with a relativistic electron beam wiggling into the modulator. After the dispersive section, the interaction gives rise to bunching at both seed positions, so that dual FEL emission occurs in the radiator, at the harmonic number n of the seed frequencies. The two successive XUV pulses are sent to the spectrometer, which records their interferometric pattern. The latter is analyzed by the direct SPIDER algorithm so that the complete field of the XUV emission is retrieved. In parallel of the measurement, the direct beam (zero-th diffraction order of the spectrometer’s grating) is sent to users beamlines.
Taking advantadge of the HGHG configuration, the requirement of a spectrally-sheared and temporally delayed replica is transferred to the seed before harmonic frequency upconversion to the XUV. The seed is split in two replicas, temporally delayed and spectrally shifted. The successive seed pulses then interact with a sufficiently long and uniform electron bunch, so as to generate two spectrally sheared and temporally delayed FEL pulses. The two replicas of the measured pulse are thus directly produced, while in a classical SPIDER apparatus the pulse under study is indirectly characterized.
3. Experimental study of the seeding stage
As a first step, we wish to show the possibility of generating conveniently two similar seed pulses. An experimental demonstration has been carried out at the Laboratoire d’Optique Appliquée, on a Ti:Sapphire source delivering 5 mJ pulses of duration 45 fs, centered at a wavelength of 815 nm, at a repetition rate of 1 kHz using a Mach-Zehnder setup depicted in Fig. 2. On each arm of the interferometer, a 200 μm–thick BBO type I crystal in the ooe configuration has been chosen, thus generating the second harmonic of the fundamental beam, with an efficiency of about 15%. The advantadge of a Mach-Zehnder configuration is to independently control beam properties on each arm so that, as shown in Fig. 3(a), two spectrally sheared replicas are easily produced. Incidentally, deeper control, like variable attenuation or spatial shaping, can eventually be done on each arm for further applications.
Fig. 2 Test setup for twin seed generation. The fundamental laser beam coming from a classical Ti:Sapphire femtosecond source is split in two paths. In each of them, an harmonic is generated in a nonlinear crystal. By slightly tilting a crystal, phase-matching conditions are changed, leading to a small and controllable spectral shift of the generated harmonic. The two beams are then recombined, a micrometric-precision motorized stage allowing to adjust the delay between the two pulses. A filter is eventually placed after recombination to leave out the residual part of the fundamental laser.
Fig. 3 Experimental characterization of the Mach-Zehnder setup. (a) measured reference spectrum (plain line) and spectrally sheared replica (dashed line, intensity multiplied by a factor 1.5). (b) measured interferogram, with a delay of 600 fs between the two replicas. (c) SPIDER retrieval of the phase with (plain line) and without (dashed line) a 1 cm–thick fused silica plate placed after recombination. Single spectra and interferogram correspond to the integration of 3 successive pulses.
Before extending our study to the XUV, a SPIDER experimental analysis on the seeding stage under test has been performed. When the two replicas are sent together, with an appropriate delay, to the visible spectrometer, an interferogram is observed, such as shown in Fig. 3(b). This trace can then be analyzed by the algorithm described in [16], resulting in the calculation of the spectral phase (Fig. 3(c)). When no dispersive element is present, a small residual third order dispersion is retrieved (dashed line), probably ensuing from the compressor settings. As expected, quadratic phase shows up when adding dispersive material on the beam path (plain line). In this article, we chose the following convention for the sign of the phase: to an up-chirped pulse corresponds a positive curvature of the temporal phase, that is a negative curvature of the spectral phase, and vice-versa.
4. Simulation parameters
For the FEL simulations, we chose to consider realistic FERMI FEL parameters (see [2,14,17]), summarized in Table 1. The seeding wavelength used here, corresponding to the third harmonic of a Ti:Sapphire source, enables to adopt a similar twin-seeding scheme as described above.
Table 1. Main parameters used for simulations. FWHM stands for the full-width at half-maximum value of the intensity. The seed bandwidth, the FEL bandwidth and the FEL spectrometer resolution are given in relative terms of the corresponding wavelengths. Undulator characteristics can be found in [18].
We need to choose the delay τ between the two pulses according to two conditions, depending on the spectrometer resolution dωFEL and the FEL bandwidth ΔωFEL [19]. First, in order to have a correct fringe resolution on the detector, τ must be shorter than π/dωFEL = 1.5 ps. Also, to obtain enough fringes, τ must be longer than 4π/ΔωFEL ≈ 100 fs. We thus choose τ = 600 fs. Finally, for satisfying the Whittaker-Shannon criterion, the frequency shear between the interfering FEL pulses has to be smaller than 2π/T, where T is the time interval whithin which the FEL pulse is expected to be contained. T = 200 fs seems reasonable, which leads to a maximum wavelength shear of 0.2 nm on the seed pulses. We opt for a value of 0.1 nm in the simulations i.e., 10% of the seed bandwidth.
The FEL simulations have been carried out with the Perseo code [20]. In order to account for prospective effects stemming from the transverse field distribution, three-dimensional FEL simulations (not shown) were also performed using the GENESIS code [21]. Final results were similar to those relying on the one-dimensional case. This is why the comprehensive work of systematic time-dependent FEL simulations used for the results presented below was done using Perseo, which is much less time-consuming while leading to the same conclusions.
The FEL simulation output provides the temporal profile of the FEL emission. In order to consider possible uncertainties and inhomogeneities (seed and current shape, phase and bandwidth of the seed pulses, slice emittance and energy spread along the electron beam, relative intensity of FEL pulses, etc.), the output phase and amplitude have been independently multiplied by a random error included within a range of ±5% of the calculated value. The SPIDER interferogram is obtained by Fourier transform of the FEL temporal field. One has to note that a full spatial modelling of the spectrometer has not been done. However, noise is artificially added to the interferogram and a background threshold is taken into account, so as to come closer to the experiment.
5. Numerical results
5.1. Fourier-limited seed
Seed pulses with flat phase are first considered. The output of the simulation is shown in Fig. 4. As expected, the shapes of the FEL pulses mirror the one of the seed i.e., a Gaussian profile (Fig. 4(a)). The twin output FEL pulses are 60 fs-long (measured at FWHM) and their phases present a small quadratic curvature resulting from the FEL dynamics [5]. The spectral interference pattern (Fig. 4(b)) of the FEL emission presents about 10 fringes within a wavelength window of 0.1 nm. According to the FERMI spectrometer resolution at 43.5 nm (see Table 1), a maximum number of about 15 fringes can be resolved within this spectral window.
Fig. 4 FEL simulation output with Fourier-transform limited seed pulses. (a) Longitudinal profile (plain line) and phase (dashed line). (b) Spectrum.
The temporal intensity retrieved by the SPIDER calculation is shown in Fig. 5(b), where it is overlapped with the first pulse (towards the head of the electron bunch and negative times in Fig. 4(a)) of the FEL simulation, taken as the reference one. As it can be seen, the agreement is satisfactory and the FWHM duration obtained from the SPIDER reconstruction is slightly shorter than the FEL simulation (55 fs). The small quadratic curvature of the phase is recovered (Fig. 5(a)), demonstrating the accuracy of the method.
Fig. 5 SPIDER reconstruction corresponding to FEL simulations carried out with Fourier-transform limited seed. (a) Spectrum (plain line) and spectral phase (dashed line). (b) Temporal intensity (plain line) compared to the direct output of the FEL simulation (dashed line).
5.2. Double-peak emission
In order to better test the robustness of the technique, we investigate thereafter a particular FEL regime using pretty near simulation parameters. As detailed in [17, 22], in specific conditions (intense seed and/or strong dispersive section, plus chirped seed), the FEL emission temporally splits into two sub-pulses, each with a distinct central wavelength. This two-colour structure is found in the reconstruction of the spectrum (Fig. 6(a)). The curve in the temporal domain (Fig. 6(b)) shows that the reconstruction remains quite good: the split structure is correctly recovered and the duration of each sub-pulse is close to the FEL simulation as is the duration of the overall envelope (≈ 300 fs). Notably, quite successful SPIDER reconstructions, not shown here, have also been obtained for different kinds of distorted FEL emission, resulting from other specific sets of machine parameters.
Fig. 6 SPIDER reconstruction corresponding to FEL simulations carried out in double-peak regime. (a) Spectrum (plain line) and spectral phase (dashed line). (b) Temporal intensity (plain line) compared to the direct output of the FEL simulation (dashed line).
5.3. Phase distortions
Let us now stress the relevance of the temporal phase profile reconstructed with SPIDER. The theory [23, 24] predicts that the seed phase structure is transferred to the FEL emission. Nonetheless, additional phase term (see Fig. 4(a)) and distortion can result from the FEL dynamics, especially when the FEL amplification reaches the saturation. One example of such an effect is shown in Fig. 7. The parabola in blue plain line represents the direct phase transfer from the seed to the FEL emission. Large variations from this parabola can be associated to phase distortion occurring at saturation.
Fig. 7 Simulated distorted FEL phase (dashed line) and its SPIDER reconstruction (green plain line). The parabola in blue plain line represents the direct phase transfer from the seed, calculated as the seed phase times the harmonic order.
It is worth noting that in this case, slight differences can be observed between the simulated FEL phase output and its SPIDER retrieval. It stems from the dissimilarity of the XUV replicas, consequence of the stochastic character of the FEL process at saturation. Because of this, deep saturation may be a limitation of our technique.
Nevertheless, this study underlines the attractiveness of FEL SPIDER measurements for investigating the amplification dynamics in the FEL and the consequences of errors or high-order terms in the seed phase and of electron beam structurations. Such investigations could be experimentally accomplished by performing a SPIDER characterization on the FEL emission and, in parallel, on the seed (see Fig. 3), building therewith a control loop for efficient FEL pulse shaping.
6. Conclusion
The feasibility of a SPIDER experiment on a seeded FEL has been demonstrated, especially in the attractive case of XUV radiation produced in a HGHG scheme. The latter does not represent a limit: our scheme can be expanded, for instance, to direct seeding with high order harmonics [3], echo-enabled harmonic generation [25] or self-seeding [26, 27]. The main requirement of the proposed scheme is a sufficently long and uniform electron bunch, which has already been experimentally achieved. The method is then non-invasive and single-shot, can be performed in real time (together with experiments), and has the great advantadge to pull the necessary handling onto the seed instead of electron beam or XUV field. Besides, control of the FEL chirp by the seed makes feasible the generation of Fourier-limited FEL pulses that can then be measured by SPIDER.
We also demonstrated the large scope and the robustness of this method by studying a peculiar case of non-Gaussian, double-peak, emission. The characterization of the latter has a significant interest since such an emission is suitable for XUV pump-probe experiments. Moreover, a single-seed SPIDER experiment in double-peak regime could be foreseen: the split sub-pulses, originating from one seed only, may be two suitable replicas (see Fig. 6).
Finally, experimental demonstration of the XUV FEL SPIDER would allow to measure the effective transfer of the seed phase and possible phase distortions, occurring through FEL amplification in different regimes. This will have an important impact for a better understanding of FEL physics and for further developments, such as the design of chirped-pulse amplification schemes [28–31].
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the COST MP1203 action and the LabEx PALM program (RAMSES project) for their financial support, and the FERMI team for their constructive discussions.
References and links
1. G. De Ninno, E. Allaria, M. Coreno, F. Curbis, M. B. Danailov, E. Karantzoulis, A. Locatelli, T. O. Mentes, M. A. Nino, C. Spezzani, and M. Trovò, “Generation of ultrashort coherent vacuum-ultraviolet pulses using electron storage rings: a new bright light source for experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 053902 (2008). [CrossRef]
2. E. Allaria, R. Appio, L. Badano, W.A. Barletta, S. Bassanese, S.G. Biedron, A. Borga, E. Busetto, D. Castronovo, P. Cinquegrana, S. Cleva, D. Cocco, M. Cornacchia, P. Craievich, I. Cudin, G. DAuria, M. Dal Forno, M.B. Danailov, R. De Monte, G. De Ninno, P. Delgiusto, A. Demidovich, S. Di Mitri, B. Diviacco, A. Fabris, R. Fabris, W. Fawley, M. Ferianis, E. Ferrari, S. Ferry, L. Fröhlich, P. Furlan, G. Gaio, F. Gelmetti, L. Giannessi, M. Giannini, R. Gobessi, R. Ivanov, E. Karantzoulis, M. Lonza, A. Lutman, B. Mahieu, M. Milloch, S.V. Milton, M. Musardo, I. Nikolov, S. Noe, F. Parmigiani, G. Penco, M. Petronio, L. Pivetta, M. Predonzani, F. Rossi, L. Rumiz, A. Salom, C. Scafuri, C. Serpico, P. Sigalotti, S. Spampinati, C. Spezzani, M. Svandrlik, C. Svetina, S. Tazzari, M. Trovò, R. Umer, A. Vascotto, M. Veronese, R. Visintini, M. Zaccaria, D. Zangrando, and M. Zangrando, “Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free-electron laser in the extreme ultraviolet,” Nat. Photon. 6, 699–704 (2012). [CrossRef]
3. G. Lambert, T. Hara, D. Garzella, T. Tanikawa, M. Labat, B. Carré, H. Kitamura, T. Shintake, M. Bougeard, S. Inoue, Y. Tanaka, P. Salières, H. Merdji, O. Chubar, O. Gobert, K. Tahara, and M.-E. Couprie, “Injection of harmonics generated in gas in a free-electron laser providing intense and coherent extreme ultraviolet light,” Nat. Phys. 4, 296 (2008). [CrossRef]
4. L. H. Yu, “Generation of intense uv radiation by subharmonically seeded single-pass free-electron lasers,” Phys. Rev. A 44, 5178 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. J. Wu, J. B. Murphy, P. J. Emma, X. Wang, T. Watanabe, and X. Zhong, “Interplay of the chirps and chirped pulse compression in a high-gain seeded free-electron laser,” JOSA B 24, 484–495 (2007). [CrossRef]
6. D. Gauthier, B. Mahieu, and G. De Ninno, ‘Direct spectrotemporal characterization of femtosecond extreme-ultraviolet pulses,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 033849 (2013). [CrossRef]
7. R. Mitzner, A. A. Sorokin, B. Siemer, S. Roling, M. Rutkowski, H. Zacharias, M. Neeb, T. Noll, F. Siewert, W. Eberhardt, M. Richter, P. Juranic, K. Tiedtke, and J. Feldhaus, “Direct autocorrelation of soft-x-ray free-electron-laser pulses by time-resolved two-photon double ionization of He,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 025402 (2009). [CrossRef]
8. P. Radcliffe, S. Dsterer, A. Azima, H. Redlin, J. Feldhaus, J. Dardis, K. Kavanagh, H. Luna, J. Pedregosa Gutierrez, P. Yeates, E. T. Kennedy, J. T. Costello, A. Delserieys, C. L. S. Lewis, R. Taïeb, A. Maquet, D. Cubaynes, and M. Meyer, “Single-shot characterization of independent femtosecond extreme ultraviolet free electron and infrared laser pulses,” App. Phys. Lett. 90, 131108 (2007). [CrossRef]
9. I. Grguraš, A. R. Maier, C. Behrens, T. Mazza, T. J. Kelly, P. Radcliffe, S. Dsterer, A. K. Kazansky, N. M. Kabachnik, Th. Tschentscher, J. T. Costello, M. Meyer, M. C. Hoffmann, H. Schlarb, and A. L. Cavalieri, “Ultrafast X-ray pulse characterization at free-electron lasers,” Nat. Photon. 6, 852–857 (2012). [CrossRef]
10. C. Iaconis and I. A. Walmsley, “Spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction of ultrashort optical pulses,” Opt. Lett. 23, 792–794 (1998). [CrossRef]
11. Z. Wu, H. Loos, Y. Shen, B. Sheehy, E. D. Johnson, S. Krinsky, J. B. Murphy, J. Rose, T. Shaftan, X.-J. Wang, and L. H. Yu, “Spectral phase modulation and chirped pulse amplification in high gain harmonic generation,” Proceedings of the 2004 FEL conference, 285–288.
12. Y. Mairesse, O. Gobert, P. Bréger, H. Merdji, P. Meynadier, P. Monchicourt, M. Perdrix, P. Salières, and B. Carré, “High harmonic XUV spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 173903 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. E. Cormier, I. A. Walmsley, E. M. Kosik, A. S. Wyatt, L. Corner, and L. F. DiMauro, “Self-referencing, spectrally, or spatially encoded spectral interferometry for the complete characterization of attosecond electromagnetic pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 033905 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. E. Allaria, F. Bencivenga, R. Borghes, F. Capotondi, D. Castronovo, P. Charalambous, P. Cinquegrana, M. B. Danailov, G. De Ninno, A. Demidovich, S. Di Mitri, B. Diviacco, D. Fausti, W. M. Fawley, E. Ferrari, L. Fröhlich, D. Gauthier, A. Gessini, L. Giannessi, R. Ivanov, M. Kiskinova, G. Kurdi, B. Mahieu, N. Mahne, I. Nikolov, C. Masciovecchio, E. Pedersoli, G. Penco, L. Raimondi, C. Serpico, P. Sigalotti, S. Spampinati, C. Spezzani, C. Svetina, M. Trovò, and M. Zangrando, “Two-colour pumpprobe experiments with a twin-pulse-seed extreme ultraviolet free-electron laser,” Nat. Comm. 4, 2476 (2013). [CrossRef]
15. C. Svetina, A. Abrami, I. Cudin, C. Fava, S. Gerusina, R. Gobessi, L. Rumiz, G. Sostero, M. Zangrando, and D. Cocco, “Characterization of the FERMI@Elettra’s on-line photon energy spectrometer,” Proceedings SPIE 8139, Advances in X-Ray/EUV Optics and Components VI, 81390J (2011). [CrossRef]
16. C. Iaconis and I. A. Walmsley, “Self-referencing spectral interferometry for measuring ultrashort optical pulses,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 35, 4 (1999). [CrossRef]
17. B. Mahieu, E. Allaria, D. Castronovo, M. B. Danailov, A. Demidovich, G. De Ninno, S. Di Mitri, W. M. Fawley, E. Ferrari, L. Fröhlich, D. Gauthier, L. Giannessi, N. Mahne, G. Penco, L. Raimondi, S. Spampinati, C. Spezzani, C. Svetina, M. Trovò, and M. Zangrando, “Two-colour generation in a chirped seeded Free-Electron Laser: a close look,” Opt. Exp. 21, 22728–22741 (2013). [CrossRef]
18. FERMI@Elettra Conceptual Design Report.
19. M. E. Anderson, L. E. E. de Araujo, E. M. Kosik, and I. A. Walsmley, “The effects of noise on ultrashort-optical-pulse measurement using SPIDER,” Appl. Phys. B 70, S85 (2000). [CrossRef]
20. L. Giannessi, “Overview of Perseo, a system for simulating FEL dynamics in Mathcad,” Proceedings of the 2006 FEL conference, MOPPH026.
21. S. Reiche, “GENESIS 1.3: a fully 3D time-dependent FEL simulation code,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 429, 243–248 (1999). [CrossRef]
22. G. De Ninno, B. Mahieu, E. Allaria, L. Giannessi, and S. Spampinati, “Chirped seeded free- electron lasers: self standing light sources for two-color pump-probe experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 064801 (2013). [CrossRef]
23. G. Stupakov, “Effect of finite pulse length and laser frequency chirp on HGHG and EEHG seeding,” SLAC Report No. SLAC-PUB-14639 (2011).
24. D. Ratner, A. Fry, G. Stupakov, and W. White, “Laser phase errors in seeded free electron lasers,” PRST-AB 15, 030702 (2012).
25. D. Xiang, E. Colby, M. Dunning, S. Gilevich, C. Hast, K. Jobe, D. McCormick, J. Nelson, T. O. Raubenheimer, K. Soong, G. Stupakov, Z. Szalata, D. Walz, S. Weathersby, M. Woodley, and P.-L. Pernet, “Demonstration of the echo-enabled harmonic generation technique for short-wavelength seeded free electron lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 114801 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. J. Amann, W. Berg, V. Blank, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, P. Emma, Y. Feng, J. Frisch, D. Fritz, J. Hastings, Z. Huang, J. Krzywinski, R. Lindberg, H. Loos, A. Lutman, H.-D. Nuhn, D. Ratner, J. Rzepiela, D. Shu, Yu. Shvyd’ko, S. Spampinati, S. Stoupin, S. Terentyev, E. Trakhtenberg, D. Walz, J. Welch, J. Wu, A. Zholents, and D. Zhu, “Demonstration of self-seeding in a hard-X-ray free-electron laser,” Nat. Photon. 6, 693–698 (2012). [CrossRef]
27. A.A. Lutman, F.-J Decker, J. Arthur, M. Chollet, Y. Feng, J. Hastings, Z. Huang, H. Lemke, H.-D. Nuhn, A. Marinelli, J.L. Turner, S. Wakatsuki, J. Welch, and D. Zhu, “Demonstration of single-crystal self-seeded two-color X-ray free-electron lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 254801 (2014). [CrossRef]
28. L. H. Yu, E. Johnson, D. Li, and D. Umstadter, “Femtosecond free-electron laser by chirped pulse amplification,” Phys. Rev. E 49, 4480 (1994). [CrossRef]
29. F. Frassetto, L. Giannessi, and L. Poletto, “Compression of XUV FEL pulses in the few-femtosecond regime,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 593, 14–16 (2008). [CrossRef]
30. C. Feng, L. Shen, M. Zhang, D. Wang, Z. Zhao, and D. Xiang, “Chirped pulse amplification in a seeded free-electron laser for generating high-power ultra-short radiation,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 712, 113–119 (2013). [CrossRef]
31. E. Oliva, M. Fajardo, L. Li, M. Pittman, T. T. T. Le, J. Gautier, G. Lambert, P. Velarde, D. Ros, S. Sebban, and Ph. Zeitoun, “A proposal for multi-tens of GW fully coherent femtosecond soft X-ray lasers,” Nat. Photon. 6, 764–767 (2012). [CrossRef]
