Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

4-fold photocurrent enhancement in ultrathin nanoplasmonic perovskite solar cells

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Although perovskite materials have been widely investigated for thin-film photovoltaic devices due to the potential for high efficiency, their high toxicity has pressed the development of a solar cell structure of an ultra-thin absorber layer. But insufficient light absorption could be a result of ultra-thin perovskite films. In this paper, we propose a new nanoplasmonic solar cell that integrates metal nanoparticles at its rear/front surfaces of the perovskite layer. Plasmon-enhanced light scattering and near-field enhancement effects from lumpy sliver nanoparticles result in the photocurrent enhancement for a 50 nm thick absorber, which is higher than that for a 300 nm thick flat perovskite solar cell. We also predict the 4-fold photocurrent enhancement in an ultrathin perovskite solar cell with the absorber thickness of 10 nm. Our results pave a new way for ultrathin high-efficiency solar cells with either a lead-based or a lead-free perovskite absorption layer.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

Corrections

10 December 2015: A correction was made to the body text.

1. Introduction

Perovskite based thin film solar cell has attracted increasing attention as a novel emerged promising technology to harvest and convert sunlight to electricity efficiently [1, 2]. The efficiency of the perovskite solar cell has been improved from 3.8% to as high as 20.1% since the first published in 2009 [3–6]. However, there exists a severe challenge for the widespread application of perovskite solar cells. A major concern is the toxicity of lead in the perovskite materials. One way to solve this issue is to replace lead in the perovskite crystal with a less toxic metal such as Sn [7, 8]. However, the Sn based perovskite material only delivers the solar cell with an efficiency of around 6% due to the fast electron-hole recombination rate at the defect sites in the absorber [8]. An alternative approach is to maintain the high performance of the lead based perovskite solar cell with a much thinner absorber thereby reducing the amount of lead in the material to minimize the detrimental effect on environment. However previous studies have found that an optimum thickness for the perovskite layer is about 300 nm, and films thinner than this would result in lower efficiency due to insufficient light absorption [9, 10]. In this case, some novel light trapping strategies should be applied for designing perovskite solar cells with extremely thin absorber layers.

Recently, plasmonic nanoparticles and nanostructures have been proven to be a useful technology to enable solar cells to improve the efficiency with thin absorber film [11–16], with most investigation ascribing the improvement to the enhanced light absorbance via the plasmonic effects. The first mechanism is that plasmonic light scattering effect from the large size particle is capable of redirecting the incident light into solar cells with increased light path length [17, 18]. The second one is that when embedded with small metal particles, the light absorption of the absorber can be enhanced due to the near field light concentration of the nanoparticles through the localized surface plasmons [19, 20]. In this paper, to address the challenging trade-off between the high absorbance and thinner absorber required for the perovskite solar cells, plasmonic metal nanoparticles incorporated into the perovskite absorber are investigated. First, near field light concentration effects of small Au and Ag particles are explored with different particle radii, surface coverage (SC) densities and integrated positions as shown in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b). Based on the optimization results of small metal particles, a lumpy Ag nanoparticle model is proposed which consists of a large Ag particle as the core particle with many small Ag particles decorated evenly outside the core particle together, thereby providing both the plasmonic scattering and the plasmonic near field concentration mechanisms. To fully utilize the plasmonic effects of the lumpy nanoparticles, the nanoparticles are inserted in the perovskite absorber directly at the rear surface forming a nanoshell structure for the absorber layer as shown in Fig. 1(d).

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Device schematics of the plasmonic perovskite solar cells. (a) With small metal particles embedded in the perovskite absorber at the front surface. (b) With small metal particles at the rear surface. (c) With lumpy nanoparticles at the rear surface. (d) The cross-section of the solar cells embedded with the lumpy nanoparticle.

Download Full Size | PDF

2. Results

The optical performance of the designed plasmonic perovskite solar cell structure is conducted based on the finite difference time domain method (Lumerical FDTD solution). To fully optimize the lumpy nanoparticles for solar cells, the sizes of both core and surface nanoparticles need to be modified. Therefore, we first optimize the plasmonic light concentration effect of the small surface metal particles in the perovskite solar cells. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) illustrate the schemes of the model for the plasmonic perovskite solar cell with metal nanoparticles (Au or Ag) embedded in the perovskite absorber at front and rear surfaces, respectively. The solar cell is built up based on the common perovskite solar cell geometry (FTO: 700 nm, TiO2: 50 nm, Sprio-OmeTAD: 250 nm and Au back reflector: 60 nm). The thickness of the perovskite absorber is varied from 10 nm to 400 nm for the investigation of the metal nanoparticle plasmonic effects on the solar cell performances. The refractive index and the extinction coefficient of the perovskite absorber is measured using ellipsometer as shown in Fig. 2(a), which corresponds well with the data in other publications [21]. The optical constants of the other materials in the solar cells are taken from the reference [22].

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) The real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index of the perovskite material measured by ellipsometer. (b)-(e) Absorption enhancement with Au and Ag nanoparticles at different positions in 10 nm thick perovskite layer as a function of the radius and the SC density.

Download Full Size | PDF

To find out the optimum condition of the metal nanoparticles for a highest absorption enhancement in the ultrathin perovskite absorber, the radius and the SC density of the nanoparticles are systematically investigated. The thickness of the perovskite is selected to be 10 nm to demonstrate an ultrathin case. The radius of the metal nanoparticle is varied from 5 nm to 15 nm while the SC density is changed from 10% to 50%. Periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) are used at the lateral boundaries of the simulation model to mimic the infinite periodic arrays of nanoparticles. To quantify the influence of the nanoparticles on the performance of perovskite solar cells, the absorbance of the perovskite absorber is first calculated. Then by integrating the absorbance with the AM 1.5 solar spectrum, the area independent JSC can be obtained, assuming that all generated electron-hole pairs contribute to the photocurrent. Through mapping the perovskite absorption enhancement with nanoparticles as a function of the particle radius and the SC density, the optimized condition for the highest absorption enhancement in the perovskite absorber is achieved as shown in Figs. 2(b)-2(e).

Through the comparison of the perovskite absorption enhancement with Au nanoparticles in Figs. 2(b)-2(c) to that with Ag nanoparticles in Figs. 2(d)-2(e), the highest absorption enhancement of 323% is obtained with the optimized Ag nanoparticles at the rear surface of the solar cell with the particle radius of 10 nm and the SC density of 30%. The best position of the integrated nanoparticles is found to be at the rear surface in the absorber thereby avoiding the nanoparticle absorption loss when incorporated at the front surface, which can also be confirmed from the absorbance curves in Fig. 3(a). The Ag nanoparticles integrated at the rear surface can further boost the light absorbance in the short wavelength below 500 nm compared with the case with Ag nanoparticles on top. From Figs. 2(b)-2(e), it can also be observed that the Ag nanoparticles can enhance the absorbance more than the Au nanoparticles. That is mainly due to a stronger plasmonic near field light concentration effect from the Ag nanoparticle, which is illustrated in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c). From the comparison, it is clear that light intensity of Ag nanoparticles is much stronger than that of Au nanoparticles with the same size at the wavelength of 630 nm. The light energy is confined effectively around the Ag nanoparticle near the plasmon resonance frequency thereby further improving the light absorption of the perovskite material surrounding the nanoparticle.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) Absorbance in perovskite layer with/without Ag nanoparticles at the rear surface or on the top surface. (b)-(c) Normalized light intensity around Au and Ag nanoparticle in solar cells at the wavelength of 630 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

Based on the optimum condition of Ag nanoparticles in perovskite solar cells with thin absorber for the enhanced light concentration effect, a lumpy Ag nanoparticle model is designed with small Ag particles at a radius of 10 nm decorated on the surface of a large Ag core particle. To optimize the lumpy nanoparticle model, we define the radius ratio α as the ratio of the radius of the Ag core particle to that of the Ag surface particles and incorporate the lumpy nanoparticles into the thin perovskite absorber at the rear surface as being shown in Figs. 1(c) and 1(d). The radius ratios, α, are selected to be 75/10, 100/10 and 125/10 to find out the best nanoparticle parameters for the highest absorption enhancement in solar cells. Through the calculation of the absorption enhancement as a function of the radius ratio and the SC density, we find that the highest absorption enhancement of 431% is obtained under conditions with a radius ratio α = 100/10 and the SC density of 40%, as shown in Fig. 4(a).

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 (a) Absorption enhancement mapping results in the perovskite layer with lumpy Ag nanoparticles. (b) Light absorbance of the perovskite absorber with/without metal nanoparticles at the optimized conditions.

Download Full Size | PDF

To further illustrate the influence of the lumpy nanoparticle on the absorbance in the perovskite layer, light absorbance curves of 10 nm thick absorbers integrated with small Au particles, small Ag particles and lumpy Ag nanoparticles are plotted respectively and compared with the flat reference case in Fig. 4(b). It can be found that with the small Au particles in the perovskite layer, the absorbance in the longer wavelength region is improved significantly due to the plasmonic light concentration effect while the light absorbance in the same wavelength region can be further increased with the small Ag particles. In contrast, the lumpy Ag nanoparticles can further boost the absorbance in the perovskite layer over the entire wavelength region significantly. The improvement of perovskite film’s light absorbance with lumpy nanoparticles can be ascribed to two possible reasons. One is that plasmonic light scattering effect from the large core particle and light concentration effect from the small surface particles being provided by lumpy Ag nanoparticles boost the longer wavelength light absorption. The other one is that the perovskite nanoshell structure induced by the lumpy nanoparticle shown in Fig. 1(d) can enhance the short wavelength absorbance due to the modes coupling into the shell structure and the enlarged effective perovskite material absorption area [23].

The achieved enormous absorption enhancement allows us to further investigate short circuit currents of solar cells with different absorber thicknesses. Based on the previous nanoparticle optimization results, JSC values in nanoparticle incorporated solar cells with different thick perovskite layers (from 10 nm to 400 nm) are calculated and compared to the flat reference solar cells as shown in Fig. 5.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 JSC of the perovskite solar cells with surface engineered metal nanoparticles as a function of the perovskite absorber thickness.

Download Full Size | PDF

It can be observed that the JSC enhancement is much higher when absorber is thinner. When the thickness is below 100 nm, JSC can be dramatically improved with rear surface engineered metal nanoparticles. CH3NH3PbI3 is proved to be a good light absorber with visible light absorption coefficient of around 2.5 x 105 cm−1 [24], therefore, most visible light is fully absorbed already when the film is thicker than 100 nm. This situation is more significant in terms of the case with lumpy Ag nanoparticles. When the thickness of the absorber is increased from 10 nm to 50 nm, the JSC values are improved from 3.44 mA/cm2 and 10.52 mA/cm2 without nanoparticles to 18.29 mA/cm2 and 22.5 mA/cm2 respectively with lumpy nanoparticles. And after the rapid increase in JSC with respect to the absorber thickness in this range, JSC tends to saturate at around 24.5 mA/cm2 with further increased thicknesses. Rather than a dramatical improvement in JSC, further increasing the perovskite layer thickness does not significantly improve the solar cell performance. In addition, the solar cell performance with lumpy Ag nanoparticles outweighs that with small Ag and Au particles, especially at the absorber thickness of less than 50 nm. In contrast, in terms of the solar cells with small Ag particles at front, JSC decreases with increasing the thickness to over 200 nm compared to the flat reference case. This is mainly due to that the absorption loss from nanoparticles overweighs the nanoparticle induced absorption gain in the absorber. These findings indicate a preferable absorber thickness choice with designed lumpy nanoparticles for high performance ultrathin solar cells. At the point of the 50 nm thick perovskite layer, JSC is increased from 10.52 mA/cm2 to 22.5 mA/cm2, which is even higher than the maximum achievable Jsc value in a flat 300 nm thick perovskite solar cell (21.6 mA/cm2).

3. Conclusion

In conclusion, it has been theoretically found that the radii of the core and the surface particles and the surface coverage density of the lumpy Ag nanoparticles play an imperative role in the light absorption enhancement of ultra-thin perovskite solar cells. A maximum short circuit current density (JSC) gain of 431% relative to the reference flat perovskite solar cell with the absorber layer thickness of 10 nm can be achieved through optimizing the lumpy Ag nanoparticles. Under the optimized condition, we have found that the solar energy absorbed by a 50 nm thick perovskite layer is even higher than that for a 300 nm thick perovskite absorber without the modified nanoparticles.

Acknowledgments

Min Gu thanks the Australian Research Council for its support (DP140100849) and also acknowledges support from the Science and Industry Endowment Fund. Yong Peng acknowledges the support of the Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics.

References and links

1. M. A. Green, A. Ho-Baillie, and H. J. Snaith, “The emergence of perovskite solar cells,” Nat. Photonics 8(7), 506–514 (2014). [CrossRef]  

2. H. J. Snaith, “Perovskites: the emergence of a new era for low-cost, high-efficiency solar cells,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4(21), 3623–3630 (2013). [CrossRef]  

3. A. Kojima, K. Teshima, Y. Shirai, and T. Miyasaka, “Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(17), 6050–6051 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. M. Liu, M. B. Johnston, and H. J. Snaith, “Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition,” Nature 501(7467), 395–398 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. H. Zhou, Q. Chen, G. Li, S. Luo, T. B. Song, H. S. Duan, Z. Hong, J. You, Y. Liu, and Y. Yang, “Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells,” Science 345(6196), 542–546 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/images/efficiency_chart.jpg.

7. F. Hao, C. C. Stoumpos, D. H. Cao, R. P. H. Chang, and M. G. Kanatzidis, “Lead-free solid-state organic-inorganic halide perovskite solar cells,” Nat. Photonics 8(6), 489–494 (2014). [CrossRef]  

8. N. K. Noel, S. D. Stranks, A. Abate, C. Wehrenfennig, S. Guarnera, A.-A. Haghighirad, A. Sadhanala, G. E. Eperon, S. K. Pathak, M. B. Johnston, A. Petrozza, L. M. Herz, and H. J. Snaith, “Lead-free organic-inorganic tin halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications,” Energy Environ. Sci. 7(9), 3061–3068 (2014). [CrossRef]  

9. E. D. Gaspera, Y. Peng, Q. Hou, L. Spiccia, U. Bach, J. J. Jasieniak, and Y.-B. Cheng, “Ultra-thin high efficiency semitransparent perovskite solar cells,” Nano Energy 13, 249–257 (2015). [CrossRef]  

10. Y. Zhou, M. Yang, W. Wu, A. L. Vasiliev, K. Zhu, and N. P. Padture, “Room-temperature crystallization of hybrid-perovskite thin films via solvent-solvent extraction for high-performance solar cells,” J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain. 3(15), 8178–8184 (2015). [CrossRef]  

11. X. Chen, B. Jia, J. K. Saha, B. Cai, N. Stokes, Q. Qiao, Y. Wang, Z. Shi, and M. Gu, “Broadband Enhancement in Thin-Film Amorphous Silicon Solar Cells Enabled by Nucleated Silver Nanoparticles,” Nano Lett. 12(5), 2187–2192 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. B. Cai, B. Jia, Z. Shi, and M. Gu, “Near-field light concentration of ultra-small metallic nanoparticles for absorption enhancement in a-Si solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(9), 093107 (2013). [CrossRef]  

13. Z. Lu, X. Pan, Y. Ma, Y. Li, L. Zheng, D. Zhang, Q. Xu, Z. Chen, S. Wang, B. Qu, F. Liu, Y. Huang, L. Xiao, and Q. Gong, “Plasmonic-enhanced perovskite solar cells using alloy popcorn nanoparticles,” RSC Advances 5(15), 11175–11179 (2015). [CrossRef]  

14. W. Zhang, M. Saliba, S. D. Stranks, Y. Sun, X. Shi, U. Wiesner, and H. J. Snaith, “Enhancement of Perovskite-Based Solar Cells Employing Core-Shell Metal Nanoparticles,” Nano Lett. 13(9), 4505–4510 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. X. Chen, B. Jia, B. Cai, J. Fang, Z. Chen, X. Zhang, Y. Zhao, and M. Gu, “Graphenized carbon nanofiber: a novel light-trapping material to achieve ultrahigh efficiency silicon thin-film solar cells,” Adv. Mater. 27, 849–855 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. M. Gu, Z. Ouyang, B. Jia, N. Stokes, X. Chen, N. Fahim, X. Li, M. Ventura, and Z. Shi, “Nanoplasmonics: a frontier of photovoltaic solar cells,” Nanophotonics 1(3-4), 235–248 (2012). [CrossRef]  

17. A. Dabirian and N. Taghavinia, “Theoretical Study of Light Trapping in Nanostructured Thin Film Solar Cells Using Wavelength-Scale Silver Particles,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(27), 14926–14932 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. H. A. Atwater and A. Polman, “Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices,” Nat. Mater. 9(3), 205–213 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. S. K. Cushing and N. Wu, “Plasmon-Enhanced Solar Energy Harvesting,” Electrochem. Soc. Interface 22, 63–67 (2013).

20. J. A. Schuller, E. S. Barnard, W. Cai, Y. C. Jun, J. S. White, and M. L. Brongersma, “Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation,” Nat. Mater. 9(3), 193–204 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. G. Xing, N. Mathews, S. S. Lim, N. Yantara, X. Liu, D. Sabba, M. Grätzel, S. Mhaisalkar, and T. C. Sum, “Low-temperature solution-processed wavelength-tunable perovskites for lasing,” Nat. Mater. 13(5), 476–480 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. J. M. Ball, S. D. Stranks, M. T. Hörantner, S. Hüttner, W. Zhang, E. J. W. Crossland, I. Ramirez, M. Riede, M. B. Johnston, R. H. Friend, and H. J. Snaith, “Optical properties and limiting photocurrent of thin-film perovskite solar cells,” Energy Environ. Sci. 8(2), 602–609 (2015). [CrossRef]  

23. Y. Yao, J. Yao, V. K. Narasimhan, Z. Ruan, C. Xie, S. Fan, and Y. Cui, “Broadband light management using low-Q whispering gallery modes in spherical nanoshells,” Nat. Commun. 3, 664–671 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. S. Sun, T. Salim, N. Mathews, M. Duchamp, C. Boothroyd, G. Xing, T. C. Sum, and Y. M. Lam, “The origin of high efficiency in low-temperature solution-processable bilayer organometal halide hybrid solar cells,” Energy Environ. Sci. 7(1), 399–407 (2014). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Device schematics of the plasmonic perovskite solar cells. (a) With small metal particles embedded in the perovskite absorber at the front surface. (b) With small metal particles at the rear surface. (c) With lumpy nanoparticles at the rear surface. (d) The cross-section of the solar cells embedded with the lumpy nanoparticle.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) The real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index of the perovskite material measured by ellipsometer. (b)-(e) Absorption enhancement with Au and Ag nanoparticles at different positions in 10 nm thick perovskite layer as a function of the radius and the SC density.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Absorbance in perovskite layer with/without Ag nanoparticles at the rear surface or on the top surface. (b)-(c) Normalized light intensity around Au and Ag nanoparticle in solar cells at the wavelength of 630 nm.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) Absorption enhancement mapping results in the perovskite layer with lumpy Ag nanoparticles. (b) Light absorbance of the perovskite absorber with/without metal nanoparticles at the optimized conditions.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 JSC of the perovskite solar cells with surface engineered metal nanoparticles as a function of the perovskite absorber thickness.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.