Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Near-ultraviolet lateral photovoltaic effect in Fe3O4/3C-SiC Schottky junctions

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this paper, we report a sensitive lateral photovoltaic effect (LPE) in Fe3O4/3C-SiC Schottky junctions with a fast relaxation time at near-ultraviolet wavelengths. The rectifying behavior suggests that the large build-in electric field was formed in the Schottky junctions. This device has excellent position sensitivity as high as 67.8 mV mm−1 illuminated by a 405 nm laser. The optical relaxation time of the LPE is about 30 μs. The fast relaxation and high positional sensitivity of the LPE make the Fe3O4/3C-SiC junction a promising candidate for a wide range of ultraviolet/near-ultraviolet optoelectronic applications.

© 2016 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

The lateral photovoltaic effect (LPE) can be used in position-sensitive detectors (PSDs) because its output photovoltage changes linearly with the distance between the laser illumination spot and the electrodes [1–3]. Since the LPE was discovered by Schottky and expanded by Wallmark [1,4], investigations have been carried out in many different structures including Ti/Si amorphous superlattices [3], AlGaAs/GaAsheterostructures [5], hydrogenated amorphous silicon Schottky barrier structures [6] and some metal–semiconductor (MS) structures [7–10]. In addition to the sensitivity of the LPE to the position of the laser illumination, both the optical response and relaxation time associated with LPE are important characteristics for PSD applications. Because the LPE originates from the lateral diffuse transport of excited carriers from the point of excitation to the electrodes [4], the photovoltage response and relaxation time will be greatly influenced by the carrier mobility of the semiconductor in the conventional p-n or p-i-n junctions. The fast response time of LPE was achieved in Si p-n junctions due to the high carrier mobility of Si single crystal, but the position sensitivity of Si p-n PSDs is much smaller than that of a metal/Si structure [11]. However, due to the shorting effect of the metal, the LPE in metal/Si Schottky structures is highly sensitive to the metal film thickness. As a result, the metal film must be extremely thin (on the order of nanometers) resulting in instability due to the oxidation [7,11,13]. In contrast, oxide-films are stable in air and are, thus, potential candidates for LPE applications in PSDs. Some semiconductor oxides, such as Cu2O [12], show the large LPE. Recently, high position sensitivity of 32.5 mV mm−1 and a fast optical relaxation time was observed in Fe3O4/Si Schottky junctions, which is caused by the formation of accumulation of charge (inversion layer) at the interface between the half-metallic Fe3O4 thin film and the lightly-doped Si substrate due to the large difference in the work functions of Si and Fe3O4 [14].

Ultraviolet/near-ultraviolet photodetectors had been pursued for a long time due to their practical application such as the ultraviolet environmental monitoring and communicating. The ultraviolet PSD with fast response time (3~5 µs) had been realized when the Si-based junction was covered with an optical filter, but the device performance will become worse at high temperature and the high-power laser is needed [15]. Photodetectors utilizing wide bandgap semiconductors (WBS) have good visible-blind/solar-blind performance [16,17].However, there are few reports about the ultraviolet/near-ultraviolet LPE basing on WBS due to the difficulty associated with fabrication of p-type WBS. Our previous research on the LPE in Fe3O4/Si Schottky junctions suggest that fast ultraviolet/near-ultraviolet PSD could be achieved in Fe3O4/WBS Schottky junctions with large LPE if the inversion layer could be formed and the WBS has high carrier mobility. Silicon carbide is a wide-bandgap (2.2~3.3 eV at room temperature) semiconductor that is attractive for its great potential applications in ultraviolet/near-ultraviolet optoelectronic devices because of its high carrier mobility and excellent stability at high temperature [18,19].

In this paper, we report a sensitive LPE in Fe3O4/3C-SiC junctions with a fast relaxation time at near-ultraviolet wavelengths. The position sensitivity has a strong dependence on the Fe3O4 film thickness with the largest value of 67.8 mV/mm observed for a 15 nm Fe3O4 film under illumination with a 405 nm laser. The optical response and relaxation times of the LPE are roughly 3.2 μs and 30 μs, respectively.

2. Sample growth and characterization

The high quality Fe3O4 thin films were prepared on 3C-SiC (111) substrates using pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The high purity target was prepared by pressing α-Fe2O3 powder into a pellet and sintering at 1000 °C for 10 h. The base pressure of the vacuum system prior to deposition was below 10−7Torr and the substrate temperature was 350 °C. The pulsed exciter laser used KrF (λ = 248 nm) and produced a laser beam with an intensity of ~150 mJ at a rate of 3 Hz. The deposition rate was approximately 1 nm/min. After the deposition, the films were annealed for 20 minutes under vacuum at 350 °C.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected using the X'Pert XRD spectrometer with Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation. The chemical states were measured using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) patterns were performed using the Tecnai G2 F30 Field Emission Transmission Electron Microscopy. The current-voltage (I-V) curves were measured using the Keithley 2601. All samples were scanned spatially with a laser focused on a roughly 100 µm diameter spot. All the contacts (less than 0.5 mm in diameter) to the films were covered by indium. The time response of the LPE was collected by an oscilloscope of 500 MHz (Tektronix DPO 5054) using 400 nm femtosecond laser which is modulated using SHG method by α-Ti: sapphire regeneration amplified laser system(the pulse duration is 130 fs).

Figure 1(a) shows the XRD pattern of a 20 nm Fe3O4 film on 3C-SiC substrate. Only the reflections from the (111) family for Fe3O4 are clearly observed indicating that a single-phase Fe3O4 film with cubic inverse-spinel structure is formed. X-ray photoelectric spectroscopy (XPS) was performed to determine the valence states of Fe in the Fe3O4 film. Clear evidence for the presence of Fe3+ (709.5 eV and 722.5 eV) and Fe2+ (711.1 eV and 724.2 eV) was observed with a content ratio of 2:1 for Fe3+: Fe2+, as shown in Fig. 1(b), confirming the high quality of the Fe3O4 film we obtained [20].The high-resolution cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image shown in Fig. 1(c) gives the clear structural features of the Fe3O4/SiC structure. The lattice constant a is 8.406 Å, which is consistent with the XRD results (a = 8.350 Å) and the lattice spacing of Fe3O4 (8.396 Å) [21].

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) The XRD pattern of the Fe3O4 film on 3C-SiC. (b) The Fe 2p XPS spectrum of Fe3O4 on 3C-SiC substrate. (c) The high-resolution TEM pattern of Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure. (d) Transmission spectrum of 3C-SiC wafer. We can estimate that the bandgap of 3C-SiC is about 2.36 eV from the (αhv)1/2 versus hv curve because the 3C-SiC is an indirect band gap semiconductor.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Results

The longitudinal I–V characteristic of the Fe3O4/3C-SiC junction for a 15 nm Fe3O4 film was measured at room temperature. Two indium electrodes were placed on the surface of the Fe3O4 film and 3C-SiC substrate, as shown in the inset of Fig. 2(a). It is clear that the longitudinal I–V curve exhibits a backward diode-like rectifying feature [14,22]. The junction current increases dramatically with increasing forward bias voltage, but the current remains very low for the reverse bias voltage even when the voltage reaches −3 V, indicating that the Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure is a typical Schottky junction. The electron concentration of 3C-SiC (111) is n ≈4.5 × 1016 cm−3 and EF-EC≈-0.083 eV which is calculated from n = NC exp[-(EC-EF)/kBT] where NC(SiC) = 1 × 1018 cm−3 at 300 K [23]. The work function of 3C-SiC is ΦS = χSiC + (EC-EF) = 3.73 eV where χSiC = 3.65 eV is the electron affinity of SiC and EF-EV = 2.27 eV [24]. On the other hand, the work function for clean Fe3O4 is ΦM = 5.3 eV [25]. Therefore, the difference between the work functions of Fe3O4 and 3C-SiC is ΦM-ΦS = ΦMS = 1.57 eV, which will induce an upwards band-bending at the SiC/SiO2 interface leading to accumulation and bounding of holes in a quasi-triangular potential well. The metal-to-semiconductor barrier height is very close to the experimental value of 1.6 V, as shown in the Fig. 2(a). The energy band diagram of the Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure is shown in Fig. 2(b). Once the Fe3O4 film has been deposited on the 3C-SiC substrate, a large build-in electric field forms and the Schottky junction is produced which increases the separation of light-induced carrier-pairs under the radiation of the laser.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) The longitudinal I–V curve for the Fe3O4 (15nm and 10 nm)/3C-SiC junction, the inset shows the schematic circuit. (b) Energy band diagram of the Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure.

Download Full Size | PDF

The LPE in the Fe3O4/3C-SiC junctions was investigated in detail. Two indium electrodes were placed on the surface of the Fe3O4 film (2L = 3.6 mm), as shown in Fig. 3(a). When the Fe3O4 surface was partially illuminated with a laser (405 nm and 10 mW) spot, a large LPE was observed. Most of the light was absorbed by the 3C-SiC substrate because the probability of absorption in an ultrathin Fe3O4 film is very smaller than that in 3C-SiC from the transmission spectrum (See the Fig. 1(d) and the Ref [14]). The photon-excited electrons and holes will be generated in the junction and then separated into Fe3O4 and 3C-SiC by the build-in electric field, respectively. Figure 3(a) shows the dependence of the induced photovoltage on the laser position for the Fe3O4/3C-SiC junctions. The largest LPE is observed when the incident radiation spot is the closest to the electrodes and it shows a monotonic linear decrease as the spot is moved away from the contacts. According to the Ref [26], this structure with lateral photovoltaic effect can be served as a position-sensitive device (PSD) without applied gate-voltage. The largest open-circuit position sensitivity of 67.83 mV mm−1 is observed in the junction with 15 nm Fe3O4 film. The nonlinearity of the LPE on the Fe3O4 side of the junction is approximately 1.64% indicating a pretty linear response can be achieved in this junction.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) The dependence of the lateral photovoltage on the laser position for the Fe3O4/3C-SiC junctions. (b) LPE voltage on the 3C-SiC side. (c) LPE sensitivities as a function of Fe3O4 thickness. (d) LPE measurement in Fe3O4 (15 nm)/3C-SiC as a function of laser power with different light wavelengths

Download Full Size | PDF

The energy of the photons emitted by the 405 nm laser is sufficient to excite electron-hole pairs in 3C-SiC and Fe3O4. The excited electrons can move to the Fe3O4 side of the junction because of the build-in electric field of the Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure. The electric field gradient between the illuminated and the non-illuminated zones results in excess electron diffusion from the illuminated spot toward the electrodes. The position dependence of LPE can be fitted using the diffusion theory [7,13]:

LPV=KmN0[exp(|xL|λm)exp(|x+L|λm)]
Where Km is a proportionality coefficient, 2L is the distance between the two elctrodes, λm is the electron diffusion length in Fe3O4 and x is the distance between the laser spot position and light-induced electron. The fitted data are shown in Fig. 3(a). This result clearly suggests that the LPE can be explained using the diffusion model where the LPE originates from the lateral diffuse flow and recombination of the excited carriers away from the laser spot. The concentration of the excited carriers is different at different distances from the illuminated spot, therefore, the lateral field is formed and the LPE is observed.

A small LPE (11 mV) with a large nonlinearity is observed on the 3C-SiC side of the Fe3O4 (15 nm)/3C-SiC structure, as shown in Fig. 3(b), which is much smaller than the value of ~120 mV on the Fe3O4 side. We connected contact A (or C) and contact B (or D) with the positive and negative probes of a Keithley 2000 multimeter, respectively. When the laser illuminates the Fe3O4 surface near contact B, the light-induced voltage between A and B is positive, suggesting the lateral diffusion of electrons occurs. Meanwhile, the signal between C and D is also positive, suggesting that the LPE on the 3C-SiC side originates from the lateral diffusion of electrons instead of holes, because the light-excited holes are bound within the 3C-SiC semiconductor. Similar results have been reported for La0.9Sr0.1MnO3 /SrNb0.01Ti0.99O3 and La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/Si junctions and explained using the Dember effect [27,28]. Most of the light-induced electrons will have a probability (1−P) of moving into the Fe3O4 side of the junction through the Schottky barrier due to the existence of a build-in electric field, but some of the rest electrons can still diffuse within the 3C-SiC semiconductor with the probability, P, calculated from quantum tunneling theory. In a word, the LPE in both the Fe3O4 and 3C-SiC sides originate from the light-excited electrons’ lateral diffusion.

Wang et al. showed that the highest vertical photovoltage (VPE) could be observed for a critical thickness of La0.9Sr0.1MnO3 (LSMO) film in a LSMO/Si heterojunction [29]. Likewise, the LPE shows a significant dependence on the thickness of the Fe3O4 film because the interface region plays a crucial role on the separation of the excited electron-hole pairs. The highest LPE sensitivity of 67.83 mV/mm observed in the Fe3O4 (15 nm)/3C-SiC device can be understood as follows. The VPE is first induced by the separation of photon-excited electron-hole pairs through the built-in electric field near the interface. Then, the excited electrons laterally diffuse away from the laser spot and the LPE is observed. The short of the distance of excited electrons from 3C-SiC in a thinner Fe3O4 film can greatly reduce the incidence of electron-hole recombination, which results in the enhancement of photovoltage with decreasing Fe3O4 thickness. However, when the Fe3O4 layer is thinner than the critical thickness, the built-in electric field will weakened with decreasing thickness of the Fe3O4 film, reducing the separation of photon-excited electron-hole pairs. An imperfect diode-like rectifying character for the longitudinal I-V curve of the Fe3O4 (10 nm)/3C-SiC structure is shown in Fig. 2(a), confirming that the built-in field was reduced with reducing thickness of the Fe3O4 film. Therefore, there is an optimum thickness for the Fe3O4 film to obtain the highest LPE, as shown in Fig. 3(c).

To better understand the LPE, we investigated the influence of laser wavelength and power on the LPE. Figure 3(d) shows the LPE voltage as a function of laser power at different wavelengths (532, 405 and 400 nm) in the Fe3O4 (15 nm)/3C-SiC structure. The average intensity was measured with a calibrated photometer and maintained by adjusting the power of the laser. The colored lines are the theoretical results. The LPE sensitivity is proportional to the power when the applied power is low and then slowly saturates as the power is increased. The power at which saturation occurs depends on the laser wavelength. The saturation is likely attributed to the rapidly increasing recombination rate of the carriers in the region of irradiation with increasing light intensity [8].Furthermore, the lateral voltage at 532 nm is quite small, which means the LPV could be only observed under near-ultraviolet light in Fe3O4 (15 nm)/3C-SiC junctions.

The time response of the LPE for a Fe3O4/3C-SiC junction was further investigated using a 400 nm femtosecond laser system. Figure 4(a) shows the diagram of the experimental setup. Figure 4(b) shows the typical variation of the open-circuit LPE voltage with time. The rise time is approximately 80 µs and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) is approximately 500 µs when the LPE is measured directly. The FWHM indicates the relaxation time for the LPE. To reduce the influence of the circuit in the measurement, some resistors with different values were connected, as shown in the inset of Fig. 4(c). Interestingly, a fast response and relaxation time of the LPE was observed. When a resistor with 1.3 kΩ was parallel connected with the oscilloscope, the rise time dramatically reduced to roughly 3.2 µs and the relaxation time is also decreased to about 30 µs.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 (a) Diagram of the experimental set-up for the optical response measurement. (b) The variation of the open-circuit LPE with time, the schematic circuit of the measurement is shown in the inset. (c) The variation of the LPE with time, different resistances were connected in parallel to the Fe3O4 film, the schematic circuit of the measurement is shown in the inset. (d) The transverse current-voltage curve on the Fe3O4 surface of the Fe3O4 (15nm)/3C-SiC junction.

Download Full Size | PDF

Once the Fe3O4 film was deposited on the 3C-SiC substrate, a large build-in filed forms at the Fe3O4/3C-SiC interface due to the difference of work-function and bandgap between Fe3O4 and 3C-SiC. Thus, the accumulation of charge appears easily in interface of the Fe3O4/3C-SiC, which has a higher conductivity than that of semiconductor. The higher conductivity layer of Si had been named as inversion layer and the transverse I-V curve measured on the surface of Fe3O4 film is an effective way to verify the existence of inversion layer because the Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure is similar to the metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS). The nonlinear increase in current with increasing voltage confirms the existence of the inversion layer in the Fe3O4/3C-SiC junction, as shown in Fig. 4(d) [7,14,30–32]. The inversion layer provides a low resistive path for carrier transport along the interface of the Fe3O4/3C-SiC junction and thus the measured resistance on the surface of the film is the parallel resistivity of the film and the inversion layer in the Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure. Figure 5 shows a schematic circuit of the lateral flow of the excited electrons away from the laser illumination spot in the Fe3O4 film and the inversion layer at the Fe3O4/3C-SiC interface. When the laser illuminates the junction, the excited electrons are driven towards the Fe3O4 side of the junction by the build-in electric field, and then laterally diffuse away from the laser spot. The laser-excited electrons could travel in Fe3O4 and the inversion layer at the Fe3O4/3C-SiC interface. However, the inversion layer has a lower resistance compared with the Fe3O4 film, and thus most of the excited-electrons diffuse laterally in the inversion layer at the Fe3O4/3C-SiC interface rather than in the Fe3O4film. The relaxation time is greatly influenced by the carrier mobility between the two electrodes because it originates from the lateral flow of the excited electrons away from the laser spot. It’s well-known that the electron mobility in the inversion layer, i.e. at the SiO2/SiC interface (~100 cm2V−1s−1), is much larger than the electron mobility of Fe3O4 (~0.48 cm2V−1s−1) [33,34].The I-V curve for the Fe3O4 film clearly suggests parallel circuits for the Fe3O4 film and inversion layer, therefore, the fast response and relaxation time of the LPE are due to rapid movement of electrons in the inversion layer at the interface of Fe3O4/3C-SiC. Although the relaxation time (~30 µs) of LPE in Fe3O4/3C-SiC junctions is longer than that (3~5 µs) of Si-based ultraviolet PSD covered with an optical filter, but the excellent stability at high temperature and the anti-irradiation properties of SiC make the great potential applications in ultraviolet or near-ultraviolet PSD under particular environmental conditions.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 The photo-excited electron motion profile in Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Physical mechanism

We propose a following model to explain the mechanism of LPE in Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure. When a laser illuminates on the junction, light-excited carriers are generated within the 3C-SiC at laser-spot position because the probability of absorption in an ultrathin Fe3O4 film is very smaller than that in 3C-SiC from the transmission spectrum (See the Ref 14 and the Fig. 1(d)). Then these light-excited electrons will have a possibility of (1-P), which can be estimated from the Schrodinger equation, to transit from the 3C-SiC into the upper layer (the inversion layer at the Fe3O4/3C-SiC interface) through the Schottky barrier due to the build-in field, and the rest electrons, possibility of P, can laterally diffuse within the 3C-SiC [35].

Based on this model, the light-induced electrons will diffuse laterally along the inversion layer away from the illuminated spot toward two different sides and thus generate a gradient laterally between the illuminated and the non-illuminated zones. One-dimensional situation in x direction was considered. According to diffusion theory [7,13],

Dmd2N(x)dx2=N(x)τm
here x is the distance of the laser spot position, τm is the life time of diffusion electrons in the inversion layer; Dm = kBT/e2ρNF,0 is the diffusion constant, where NF,0 = 8π/3(2m0EF,0/2)3/2 is the electron density below Fermi level of EF,0 at equilibrium state and ρ is the resistivity of the inversion layer. So the density of electrons in the inversion layer at position x can be written as:
N(x)=N0exp(|xL|/λm)
Here, λm = (Dmτm)1/2 is the electron diffusion length in the inversion layer. The quasi-Fermi level is determined by the excess carrier density and their relationship can be written as:

EF,m=EF,0+14π(22m0)3/2EF,01/2N(x)

The lateral photo-voltage can be obtained by calculating the difference of the quasi-Fermi level between the two contact electrodes position A and B in Fig. 5. So,

VAB=[EF,m(B)EF,m(A)]/e=14πe(22m0)3/2EF,01/2[N(B)N(A)]
So, we can obtain the Eq. (1). Clearly, when the distance of two electrodes is small (L<<λm), the LPE will show a good linearity vs. laser position, which is the significant characteristic of LPE. And the LPE sensitivity and nonlinearity in Fe3O4 film side can be written as:

Sensitivity=κm=2KmN0λmexp(Lλm)

If L<<λm, the nonlinearity will be very small, which means the LPE will show a very linear characteristic response to the laser position.

Equation (6) suggests that the LPE sensitivity is also determined by the electron diffusion length. The electrons diffusion length is related to the effective region of Schottky field, so we can suppose that the electrons diffusion length is proportional to the Fe3O4 film thickness, and thus it can be written as λm = C(tt0), where C is a proportional coefficient and t0 is the threshold thickness of Fe3O4 films [13,36,37]. The position sensitivity of LPE in Fe3O4 side can be written as:

κm=2KmN0C(tt0)exp(LC(tt0))
So there is an optimum thickness of Fe3O4 to achieve the largest value of the LPE sensitivity in Fe3O4/3C-SiC junction and the optimum thickness is satisfied as: t = t0 + L/C.

From the Eq. (3) and Eq. (6), the sensitivity of LPE in Fe3O4 side can be written as:

κmEF,01/4ρ1/2exp(ρ1/2)

It can be clearly seen that the resistivity and the Fermi level of the thin-film material are the two crucial factors of the sensitivity of LPE.

Generally, a large laser power will result in more excited-electrons tunneling from semiconductor to upper layer because the recombined electrons have more opportunity to be re-excited by photons. Thus the density of excited-electrons in the inversion layer at the laser spot position can be written as: N0 = n0[1−Pτp/no], where p is the laser power, τ is the life time of diffusion carriers, and n0 is the density of light-excited carriers [37,38]. So, in the linear region, the voltage can be signed as:

VAB,linear=2Kmn0λmexp(Lλm)[1Pτp/n0]x

The LPE sensitivity will increase and then saturate with increasing the laser power, which is consistent with our experimental results in Fe3O4/3C-SiC junction, as shown in Fig. 3(d). And the density of light-excited carriers strongly depends on the wavelength of laser and the bandgap of semiconductor, n0 = K[Eg]α, where K is a proportional coefficient, Eg is the bandgap of the semiconductor, and α is an exponential coefficient (0.4<0.7) [39]. Most of the photon was absorbed by 3C-SiC, and the electrons with a large rest energy of (hvEg) after transition from 3C-SiC possess a longer diffusion length (λm) in Fe3O4 film that can be written as: λm = γ(hν−Eg)β, where γ is a proportional coefficient and β is another related coefficient [39,40]. So,

κm(λ)=2KmKγ(hcλEg)αβexp(Lγ(hcλEg)β)[1PτpK1(hcλEg)α]

The LPE sensitivity will be in the maximum when the wavelength of laser is close to the value: λmax = hc/{Eg + [(L/γ)/ (1−α/β)]1}.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have fabricated high quality Fe3O4/3C-SiC junctions and investigated their LPE properties. Both rectifying behavior and a large LPE were observed. The dependence of the LPE on the laser spot position shows high sensitivity (67.8 mV mm−1) and good linearity. The optical response and relaxation times caused by the formation of the inversion layer at the interface of Fe3O4/3C-SiC were 3.2 μs and 30 μs, respectively. The high positional sensitivity and fast response speed together make Fe3O4/3C-SiC junctions a promising candidate for a wide range of ultraviolet/near-ultraviolet device applications.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51472064, 51372056, 61308052, 51672057), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. HIT.BRETIII.201220, HIT.NSRIF.2012045, HIT.ICRST.2010008) and Program for Innovation Research of Science in Harbin Institute of Technology (PIRS of HIT 201616), International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (2012DFR50020) and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-0174).

References and links

1. J. T. Wallmark, “A new semiconductor photocell using lateral photoeffect,” Pro. IRE 45(4), 474–483 (1957). [CrossRef]  

2. D. W. Boeringer and R. Tsu, “Lateral photovoltaic effect in porous silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 65(18), 2332 (1994). [CrossRef]  

3. B. F. Levine, R. H. Willens, C. G. Bethea, and D. Brasen, “Lateral photoeffect in thin amorphous superlattice films of Si and Ti grown on a Si substrate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 49(22), 1537 (1986). [CrossRef]  

4. J. P. Cascales, I. Martínez, D. Díaz, J. A. Rodrigo, and F. G. Aliev, “Transient lateral photovoltaic effect in patterned metal-oxide-semiconductor films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104(23), 231118 (2014). [CrossRef]  

5. N. Tabatabaie, M. H. Meynadier, R. E. Nahory, J. P. Harbison, and L. T. Florez, “Large lateral photovoltaic effect in modulation-doped AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 55(8), 792 (1989). [CrossRef]  

6. S. Qiao, Y. Liu, J. Liu, J. Chen, G. Yan, S. Wang, and G. Fu, “Large lateral photovoltaic effect in a-Si:H/c-Sip-i-n structure with the aid of bias voltage,” Appl. Phys. Express 8(12), 122201 (2015). [CrossRef]  

7. S. Q. Xiao, H. Wang, C. Q. Yu, Y. X. Xia, J. J. Lu, Q. Y. Jin, and Z. H. Wang, “A novel position-sensitive detector based on metal–oxide–semiconductor structures of Co–SiO2–Si,” New J. Phys. 10(3), 033018 (2008). [CrossRef]  

8. S. Q. Xiao, H. Wang, Z. C. Zhao, Y. Z. Gu, Y. X. Xia, and Z. H. Wang, “The Co-film-thickness dependent lateral photoeffect in Co-SiO2-Si metal-oxide-semiconductor structures,” Opt. Express 16(6), 3798–3806 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. S. Liu, X. Xie, and H. Wang, “Lateral photovoltaic effect and electron transport observed in Cr nano-film,” Opt. Express 22(10), 11627–11632 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. S. Wang, W. Wang, L. Zou, X. Zhang, J. Cai, Z. Sun, B. Shen, and J. Sun, “Magnetic tuning of the photovoltaic effect in silicon-based Schottky junctions,” Adv. Mater. 26(47), 8059–8064 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. J. Henry and J. Livingstone, “Aging effects of Schottky barrier position sensitive detectors,” IEEE Sens. J. 6(6), 1557–1563 (2006). [CrossRef]  

12. L. Du and H. Wang, “Infrared laser induced lateral photovoltaic effect observed in Cu2O nanoscale film,” Opt. Express 18(9), 9113–9118 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. C. Q. Yu, H. Wang, S. Q. Xiao, and Y. X. Xia, “Direct observation of lateral photovoltaic effect in nano-metal-films,” Opt. Express 17(24), 21712–21722 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. X. Wang, B. Song, M. Huo, Y. Song, Z. Lv, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Song, J. Wen, Y. Sui, and J. Tang, “Fast and sensitive lateral photovoltaic effects in Fe3O4/Si Schottky junction,” RSC Advances 5(80), 65048–65051 (2015). [CrossRef]  

15. http://www.hamamatsu.com/resources/pdf/ssd/s8673_kpsd1024e.pdf.

16. G. Shoute, A. Afshar, T. Muneshwar, K. Cadien, and D. Barlage, “Sustained hole inversion layer in a wide-bandgap metal-oxide semiconductor with enhanced tunnel current,” Nat. Commun. 7, 10632 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. S. H. Park, G. Yuan, D. Chen, K. Xiong, J. Song, B. Leung, and J. Han, “Wide bandgap III-nitride nanomembranes for optoelectronic applications,” Nano Lett. 14(8), 4293–4298 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. J. Kunc, Y. Hu, J. Palmer, Z. Guo, J. Hankinson, S. H. Gamal, C. Berger, and W. A. de Heer, “Planar edge Schottky barrier-tunneling transistors using epitaxial graphene/SiC junctions,” Nano Lett. 14(9), 5170–5175 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. X. Chen, H. Zhu, J. Cai, and Z. Wu, “High-performance 4H-SiC-based ultraviolet p-i-n photodetector,” J. Appl. Phys. 102(2), 024505 (2007). [CrossRef]  

20. S. Tiwari, R. Prakash, R. J. Choudhary, and D. M. Phase, “Oriented growth of Fe3O4 thin film on crystalline and amorphous substrates by pulsed laser deposition,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40(16), 4943–4947 (2007). [CrossRef]  

21. Z. Zhang and S. Satpathy, “Electron states, magnetism, and the Verwey transition in magnetite,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 44(24), 13319–13331 (1991). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. K.-J. Jin, H.-B. Lu, K. Zhao, C. Ge, M. He, and G.-Z. Yang, “Novel multifunctional properties induced by interface effects in perovskite oxide heterostructures,” Adv. Mater. 21(45), 4636–4640 (2009). [CrossRef]  

23. S. Nishino, “Production of large-area single-crystal wafers of cubic SiC for semiconductor devices,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 42(5), 460 (1983). [CrossRef]  

24. G. Brauer, W. Anwand, E. Nicht, J. Kuriplach, M. Sob, N. Wagner, P. G. Coleman, M. J. Puska, and T. Korhonen, “Evaluation of some basic positron-related characteristics of SiC,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 54(4), 2512–2517 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. M. Fonin, R. Pentcheva, Y. S. Dedkov, M. Sperlich, D. V. Vyalikh, M. Scheffler, U. Rüdiger, and G. Güntherodt, “Surface electronic structure of theFe3O4 (100): Evidence of a half-metal to metal transition,” Phys. Rev. B 72(10), 104436 (2005). [CrossRef]  

26. H. Niu, C. Aoki, T. Matsuda, M. Takai, and M. Maeda, “A position-sensitive MOS device using lateral photovoltaic effect,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26(2), L35–L37 (1987). [CrossRef]  

27. K.-J. Jin, K. Zhao, H.-B. Lu, L. Liao, and G.-Z. Yang, “Dember effect induced photovoltage in perovskite p-n heterojunctions,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(8), 081906 (2007). [CrossRef]  

28. L. Liao, K.-J. Jin, C. Ge, C. Hu, H.-B. Lu, and G.-Z. Yang, “A theoretical study on the dynamic process of the lateral photovoltage in perovskite oxide heterostructures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(6), 062116 (2010). [CrossRef]  

29. C. Wang, K.-J. Jin, R.-Q. Zhao, H.-B. Lu, H.-Z. Guo, C. Ge, M. He, C. Wang, and G.-Z. Yang, “Ultimate photovoltage in perovskite oxide heterostructures with critical film thickness,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(18), 181101 (2011). [CrossRef]  

30. J. K. Tang, J. B. Dai, K. Y. Wang, W. L. Zhou, N. Ruzycki, and U. Diebold, “'Current-controlled channel switching and magnetoresistance in an Fe3C island film supported on a Si substrate,” J. Appl. Phys. 91(10), 8411 (2002). [CrossRef]  

31. X. Wang, Y. Sui, J. Tang, C. Wang, X. Zhang, Z. Lu, Z. Liu, W. Su, X. Wei, and R. Yu, “Amplification of magnetoresistance of magnetite in an Fe3O4-SiO2-Si structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(1), 023502 (2008). [CrossRef]  

32. X. Wang, X. Zhao, C. Hu, Y. Zhang, B. Song, L. Zhang, W. Liu, Z. Lv, Y. Zhang, J. Tang, Y. Sui, and B. Song, “Large lateral photovoltaic effect with ultrafast relaxation time in SnSe/Si junction,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(2), 023502 (2016). [CrossRef]  

33. N. S. Saks and A. K. Agarwal, “Hall mobility and free electron density at the SiC/SiO2 interface in 4H–SiC,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 77(20), 3281 (2000). [CrossRef]  

34. D. Reisinger, P. Majewski, M. Opel, L. Alff, and R. Gross, “Hall effect, magnetization, and conductivity of Fe3O4 epitaxial thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(21), 4980 (2004). [CrossRef]  

35. J. I. Pankowe, Optical Processes in Semiconductors (Academic, 1971).

36. R. S. Markiewicz and L. A. Harris, “Two-dimensional resistivity of ultrathin metal films,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 46(17), 1149–1153 (1981). [CrossRef]  

37. C. Yu and H. Wang, “Large near-infrared lateral photovoltaic effect observed in Co/Si metal-semiconductor structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(17), 171102 (2010). [CrossRef]  

38. C. Yu and H. Wang, “Light-induced bipolar-resistance effect based on metal-oxide-semiconductor structures of Ti/SiO(2)/Si,” Adv. Mater. 22(9), 966–970 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

39. C. Yu and H. Wang, “Large lateral photovoltaic effect in metal-(oxide-) semiconductor structures,” Sensors (Basel) 10(11), 10155–10180 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

40. B. F. Levine, R. H. Willens, C. G. Bethea, and D. Brasen, “Wavelength dependence of the lateral photovoltage in amorphous superlattice films of Si and Ti,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 49(23), 1608 (1986). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) The XRD pattern of the Fe3O4 film on 3C-SiC. (b) The Fe 2p XPS spectrum of Fe3O4 on 3C-SiC substrate. (c) The high-resolution TEM pattern of Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure. (d) Transmission spectrum of 3C-SiC wafer. We can estimate that the bandgap of 3C-SiC is about 2.36 eV from the (αhv)1/2 versus hv curve because the 3C-SiC is an indirect band gap semiconductor.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) The longitudinal I–V curve for the Fe3O4 (15nm and 10 nm)/3C-SiC junction, the inset shows the schematic circuit. (b) Energy band diagram of the Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) The dependence of the lateral photovoltage on the laser position for the Fe3O4/3C-SiC junctions. (b) LPE voltage on the 3C-SiC side. (c) LPE sensitivities as a function of Fe3O4 thickness. (d) LPE measurement in Fe3O4 (15 nm)/3C-SiC as a function of laser power with different light wavelengths
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) Diagram of the experimental set-up for the optical response measurement. (b) The variation of the open-circuit LPE with time, the schematic circuit of the measurement is shown in the inset. (c) The variation of the LPE with time, different resistances were connected in parallel to the Fe3O4 film, the schematic circuit of the measurement is shown in the inset. (d) The transverse current-voltage curve on the Fe3O4 surface of the Fe3O4 (15nm)/3C-SiC junction.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 The photo-excited electron motion profile in Fe3O4/3C-SiC structure.

Equations (10)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

L P V = K m N 0 [ exp ( | x L | λ m ) exp ( | x + L | λ m ) ]
D m d 2 N ( x ) d x 2 = N ( x ) τ m
N ( x ) = N 0 exp ( | x L | / λ m )
E F , m = E F , 0 + 1 4 π ( 2 2 m 0 ) 3 / 2 E F , 0 1 / 2 N ( x )
V AB = [ E F , m ( B ) E F , m ( A ) ] / e = 1 4 π e ( 2 2 m 0 ) 3 / 2 E F , 0 1 / 2 [ N ( B ) N ( A ) ]
S e n s i t i v i t y = κ m = 2 K m N 0 λ m exp ( L λ m )
κ m = 2 K m N 0 C ( t t 0 ) exp ( L C ( t t 0 ) )
κ m E F , 0 1 / 4 ρ 1 / 2 exp ( ρ 1 / 2 )
V AB,linear = 2 K m n 0 λ m exp ( L λ m ) [ 1 P τ p / n 0 ] x
κ m ( λ ) = 2 K m K γ ( h c λ E g ) α β exp ( L γ ( h c λ E g ) β ) [ 1 P τ p K 1 ( h c λ E g ) α ]
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.