Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Synthesis of molybdenum oxide-titanium dioxide nanocomposites with ultrashort laser ablation in water

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Nanocomposites of Molybdenum oxide (MoO3) and Titanium dioxide (TiO2) were synthesized with femtosecond laser ablation of the pelleted powder in water. The pressing with Cold Isostatic press (CIP) provides facile method for pelletization of the oxides mixture. With this method the nanocomposites can be synthesized without replacement of the target during laser ablation. After laser ablation in water the stable MoO3-TiO2 nanocomposites were synthesized. The morphology of the synthesized nanocomposites was investigated with transmission electron microscopy. While the band gap modifications of the synthesized nanocomposites were witnessed with UV-Visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy analysis. Besides, the generated nanocomposites were used for photovoltaic and photocatalytic applications. The nanocomposites exhibit significant improvement in the rate of photo conversion and photodegradation as well.

© 2017 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

The necessity of the clean water supply and green energy has been aggrandized globally. Heavy metals, industrial waste and dyes are the main sources of water pollution [1]. TiO2 stands as a potential candidate for the degradation of organic dyes, because of its inherited characteristics. However, the wide band gap (3.2 eV) and rapid recombination of photo-generated electrons imposes constraints for its utilization in the photo degradation processes [2]. In order to subdue these constraints, numerous strategies have been adopted for nanocomposites synthesis of TiO2 with metals, nonmetals, noble metals and semiconducting materials [3–11]. Thin films of TiO2 and MoO3 have also been demonstrated to be as a good photocatalyst [12, 13]. Experiments were performed in order to investigate the hybridize TiO2 with MoO3 via different synthesis techniques [14–22]. In 2010, core-shell TiO2 and MoO3 nanostructures were synthesized, in which TiO2 served as a core and MoO3 as a shell [23, 24]. Recently, a significant improvement in photochromic properties has also been successfully attempted via TiO2-MoO3 nanostructures. Two types of solvents were used, in which the nanostructures exhibited 66.6% higher photochromic coloration efficiency in ethanol than in water [25]. However, these techniques are surfactants based and required thermal treatments in order to avoid bi-products.

Here we provide a substitutive approach for nanocomposites synthesis with femtosecond laser ablation in water. The objective of current investigation is the synthesis of MoO3-TiO2 nano-composites with novel approach of pelletization, which was followed by laser ablation in water. In this approach, MoO3 was mixed with TiO2 and pressed into pellets with the help of cold isostatic press (CIP) technique. The stable nanocomposites were synthesized with femtosecond laser ablation of the pellets in pure distilled water. Besides, the nanocomposites were applied for Methylene Blue (MB) dye degradation and current-voltage study to investigate the photocatalytic and photovoltaic behaviors of the generated nanocomposites.

2. Experimental Protocols

The powder of MoO3 in (1, 3, 6 and 9 atm. %) was mixed with TiO2. For each pellet, 1.5 g of the mixed powder was pressed with hydraulic press. In order to overcome fragility of the material in water, the generated pellets were pressed with Cold Isostatic Press (CIP) by applying pressure of 200 MPa. As a consequence, the obtained pellets were of enough hardness and have no brittleness for nanocomposites synthesis with laser ablation in water. In the following text, the samples with MoO3 contents of 1, 3, 6 and 9 atm. % mixed with TiO2 are named as 1% MoO3-TiO2, 3% MoO3-TiO2, 6% MoO3-TiO2 and 9% MoO3-TiO2, respectively. During the experiment, an ultrashort Ti: Sapphire laser operating at 800 nm, with repetition rate of 1 kHz and 70 fs pulse duration was utilized in current investigation. Laser pulses with 0.2 mJ pulse energy were focused perpendicularly on the pellets surface with the help of 20 cm-plano convex lens, which resulted in a spot size of 0.45 cm2. The pellets performed of 2 mm thickness and 18 mm diameters were obtained. The target density (TD) of the pellets was 78%. The pellets were staged inside a glass vessel, which was filled with 7 ml deionized water (18 MΩ). The liquid column above the pellet surface was 6 mm. During nanocomposites synthesis, the stage containing glass vessel was rotated at a speed of 8 revolutions per minute (rpm). The stage was allowed to move 0.5 mm horizontally after each cycle of rotation. This process of laser ablation was kept running for 30 minutes duration. As a result, stable nanocomposites colloids with violet appearance for more than two weeks were obtained.

The Crystallinity of the synthesized nanocomposites colloids was probed with X-Ray diffraction (XRD) using Cu Kα radiation. While the absorption properties were investigated with UV-Vis spectro-photometer, which was equipped with diffuse reflectance port. The generated nanocomposites colloids were centrifuged at 9,000 rpm for 9 minutes, which was followed by drying the residue at 70 °C for 5 hours. As a result 3.1 mg of the nanocomposites powders were achieved. Almost same quantity of weight loss was examined by weighing the pellets before and after laser ablation. The synthesized nanocomposites were utilized for XPS, UV-Visible, photovoltaic and photocatalytic measurements. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) operating at 300 kV was utilized to ascertain the size of the generated nanocomposites colloids. For this analysis a few drops of the synthesized colloids were put on a Cu grid, which was followed by TEM and EDS analyses. An autolab potentiostat equipped with a 100 W xenon lamp was utilized for photovoltaic measurements. The current density-voltage (J-V) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were carried out under xenon lamp.

The valence state of the nanocomposites was ascertained with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, thermo Escalab 250 Xi). The measurements were carried out with Al Kα as a radiation source, comprising hυ = 1486.6 eV energy. While the values of binding energy were referenced to carbon C 1s peaks ranging from 284.6 to 285.2 eV. The photocatalytic assay of the synthesized nanocomposites was inspected by MB dye degradation with visible light irradiation. For this measurement, 4.4 mg of the catalyst and 0.44 mg of the MB concentrations were maintained in 40 mL water. The degradation measurements were carried out using mercury vapor lamp with 150 W power and wavelength from 420 nm to 800 nm for four hours. The visible light from the lamp was focused perpendicularly on the glass vessel. After continuous irradiation with mercury vapor lamp, the aliquots of samples were taken and centrifuged to eliminate photo-catalysts particulates. The degradation efficiency was ascertained with UV-Vis spectrometer. In order to investigate the photovoltaic properties of the nanocomposites, the mass concentration of 1.5 g/500 ml was maintained. The solution was dropped on fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) glass substrate, which served as a working electrode followed by drying in an oven at 80 °C. The Ag-AgCl and Pt plate were rendered as a reference and counter electrodes respectively in one mole NaOH electrolyte solution.

3. Results and Discussion

Synthesis of nanomaterial with laser ablation in liquids is governed by many factors and it is difficult to ascertain complex process of nanomaterials synthesis in liquids [9]. However, in our experiment when laser pulses hit the pellets surface, the dense clusters of the ablated species were ejected from the target. These species were accompanied by the generation of shock waves in the vicinity of laser impact. Therefore, the pressure and thermal gradients were amplified, which augmented the reaction of ablated species with the surrounding liquid. During the continuous process of laser ablation more species were ablated and the pressure gradient goes on increasing. The water layer restricts the forceful ejection of ablated species, which causes the confinement to the ablated species. A stage occurred when the confined zone could not sustain and the dense clouds of nanocomposites were ejected in water.

According to Schmitz et al [26] for nanomaterials synthesis with laser ablation in liquids the target density (TD) is one of the important factors. They speculated that the target porosity might have an impact on the particles crystallinity. In our experiment the TD was close to 80%, which might be supportive for the nanocomposites synthesis with 0.2 mJ pulse energy in water. The surface morphology of the synthesized nanocomposites is exhibited in Fig. 1. It can be recognized from Fig. 1(b) that spherical shaped TiO2 nanoparticles are decorated with MoO3 nanoparticles. The average size of the nanocomposites was 4.81 ± 0.79 nm, while the size ranged from 2 to 34 nm. The co-existence of crystalline TiO2 and MoO3 was revealed from HR-TEM images in Fig. 1(c). The fringe separations of 0.35 nm for TiO2 and 0.23 nm for MoO3 were determined from HR-TEM images. The elemental presence was analyzed with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping in Figs. 1(d)-1(f). The EDS results represented the TiO2 nanoparticles in Fig. 1(e), while the existence of MoO3 nanoparticles was revealed in Fig. 1(f). Therefore, the EDS results witness the co-existence of TiO2 and MoO3 in the synthesized nanocomposites. It means that pelletization with CIP followed by laser ablation provided a facile route for nanocomposites synthesis. Furthermore, the current mode of nanocomposites synthesis was without the replacement of target during laser ablation. In this approach, no subsequent heat treatment was mandatory for pelletization of the oxides mixture. Besides, during synthesis of the nanocomposites with replacement of one target by the other, a part of laser energy is wasted because of interaction with nanoparticle colloids from first target [27].

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 TEM images of the TiO2-MoO3 nanocomposites for 100 nm (a), and 50 nm (b), HR-TEM image of the nanocomposites (c), selected area EDS elemental mapping (d), Ti Kα1 (e), and Mo Kα1 (f).

Download Full Size | PDF

Therefore, the current method for nanocomposites synthesis with laser ablation is free from replacement of the target and more laser energy can be saved. The XRD patterns of the nanocomposites with different contents of MoO3 are depicted in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). It can be presumed from Fig. 2(a) that diffraction peaks of XRD pattern for TiO2 nanoparticles contains anatase phase with diffraction angles at 25.2°. While MoO3 diffraction peaks appears at 12.7° and 25.6° for 6%MO3-TiO2 and 9% MO3-TiO2, which is indicated in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). The diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) in Fig. 2(c) shows that the absorption edges of the nanocomposites were shifted towards visible region of the solar spectrum. Such shift indicates that sufficient quantity of MoO3 has been mixed with TiO2 by laser ablation. The band gap energy (Eg) was calculated using Eg = 1239.8/λ, which was 3.10 eV for pure TiO2 nanoparticles. Similarly, the band gaps calculated for 1%MoO3-TiO2, 3% MoO3-TiO2, 6% MoO3-TiO2, and 9% MoO3-TiO2 were 2.98, 2.92, 2.85, and 2.78 eV respectively. It means that the band gap of TiO2 can be decreased with current approach. The XPS spectrum of the nanocomposites generated with laser ablation of 3% MoO3-TiO2 is depicted in Fig. 3(a). The spectrum exhibits that the Ti, Mo, O and C elements were present on nanocomposites surface. This is in line with the TEM and EDS results, in which co-existence of TiO2 and MoO3 has been witnessed.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 XRD patterns of (a) TiO2, 1% MoO3-TiO2, 3% MoO3-TiO2, 6%MoO3-TiO2 and 9% MoO3-TiO2 nanocomposites, (b) Enlarged image showing MoO3 peak at 25.2° and 25.6°. (c) DRS spectra of TiO2, 1% MoO3-TiO2, 3% MoO3-TiO2, 6% MoO3-TiO2 and 9% MoO3-TiO2 nanocomposites, (d) Band gap calculation for MoO3-TiO2 nanocomposites.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 XPS spectrum of the nanocomposites (a), deconvoluted spectrum of Mo 3d3/2 into 231.6 and 232.2 eV (b), Ti 2p spectrum showing 457.8 eV and 463.8 eV binding energies (c).

Download Full Size | PDF

The deconvoluted peaks for Mo3d in Fig. 3(b) at 231.6 and 232.2 eV denote the Mo5+ and Mo6+ states, which offers their key role in band gap modification [28].In Fig. 3(c), the binding energies for Ti 2P3/2 and Ti 2P1/2 at 457.8 and 463.8 eV indicate the Ti4+ oxidation state [29]. The oxidation state is an important ingredient in dye degradation, which can be ascribed to the mixing of MoO3 with TiO2 as a result of laser ablation.

The photovoltaic assay of the nanocomposites was ascertained in terms of the photo conversion efficiency for dye sensitized solar cells. Figure 4 describes the photovoltaic performance of nanocomposites for dye synthesized solar cells. The values of photovoltaic and photocatalytic parameters are summarized in Table 1.The best performance of current density-voltage is obtained from 3%MoO3-TiO2 as shown in Fig. 4(a). Besides, from EIS analysis in Fig. 4(b) the smallest arc radius was derived from 3% MoO3-TiO2 sample as well. It means that better charge transfer and less resistance Rct have been offered by nanocomposites synthesized with 3% MoO3-TiO2.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 J-V graphs of the nanocomposites (a) and nyquist plots of the nanocomposites (b) for different MoO3 concentrations mixed with TiO2.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 1. Photovoltaic and photocatalytic parameters of the nanocomposites

The photocatalytic performance of the synthesized nanocomposites was evaluated in terms of MB dye degradation under visible light irradiation for four hours. The nanocomposites show higher photocatalytic efficiency compared with pure TiO2 nanoparticles. In Fig. 5, the 3%MoO3-TiO2 exhibited stronger photocatalytic efficiency. It can be presumed that 3% MoO3-TiO2 provided e–h+ separation and interfacial charge transfer during dye degradation [30,31]. After 4 hours irradiation with visible light only 5% of MB dye was left as shown in Fig. 5. It is also shown in Fig. 5 that dye degradation of nanocomposites was hindered with the addition of MoO3 above 3%. This is ascribed to exponential enhancement in the recombination process as the distance between e–h+ is reduced [17].

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 MB dye degradation under visible light for TiO2 mixed with different MoO3 concentrations.

Download Full Size | PDF

In previous work by the other researchers the best performance for dye degradation was observed with 5% Mo concentration [21]. However, in our experiment the best performance for dye degradation was examined with 3% MoO3 concentration. This is because the dye degradation reaction is termed as a surface reaction, which might be dependent on the mode of nanocomposites synthesis. For the nanocomposites synthesized with chemical methods the photocatalytic activity is hampered because of the surface contamination with residual reagents [32]. In contrast, the synthesis of the nanocomposites with laser ablation is deemed as relatively green technique, which does not require residual reagents during the synthesis process. Therefore, the nanocomposites synthesis with laser ablation could have better surface reaction for dye degradation and the photocatalyst with 3% MoO3 concentration exhibited best performance for MB dye degradation. Overall, the current approach for nanocomposites synthesis based on laser ablation of the pelleted sample provided a promising substitute for nanocomposites generation. This approach unveils the channels of interest for nanocomposites synthesis with laser ablation of other materials in powder form.

4. Conclusion

In summary, a surfactant free approach was devised for MoO3-TiO2 nanocomposites synthesis with pelleted powder samples. TEM analysis exhibited the TiO2 nanoparticles decorated with MoO3. The photovoltaic as well as photocatalytic characteristics of the nanocomposites were investigated. The nanocomposites manifested an efficient photo-conversion performance and light harvesting capability for MB dye degradation under visible light irradiation. This remarkable performance was attributed to better e–h+ separation by MoO3-TiO2 nanocomposites. Further research can be conducted by mixing more compounds for photo conversion and photocatalytic applications.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Key Scientific Instrument Project (2012YQ150092), National Natural Science Fund of China (11434005, 61505106, 11561121003 and 11504237), Shanghai municipal Science and Technology Commission (14JC1401600), and Shanghai Chenguang Project (15CG51).

References and links

1. C. Hu and Y. Wang, “Decolorization and Biodegradability of photocatalytic treated azo dyes and wood textile wastewater,” Chemosphere 39, 2107–2115 (1999).

2. Y. Zhang, W. Fu, H. Yang, S. Liu, P. Sun, M. Yuan, D. Ma, W. Zhao, Y. Sui, M. Li, and Y. Li, “Synthesis and characterization of P-doped TiO2 nanotubes,” Thin Solid Films 518(1), 99–103 (2009). [CrossRef]  

3. H. Y. Lin, Y. Y. Chou, C. L. Cheng, and Y. F. Chen, “Giant enhancement of band edge emission based on ZnO/TiO(2) nanocomposites,” Opt. Express 15(21), 13832–13837 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. D. Li, H. Huang, X. Chen, Z. X. Chen, W. J. Li, D. Ye, and X. Z. Fu, “New synthesis of excellent visible-lightTiO2-xNx photocatalyst using a very simple method,” J. Solid State Chem. 180(9), 2630–2634 (2007). [CrossRef]  

5. H. Guo, M. Kemell, M. Heikkila, and M. Leskela, “Noble metal modified TiO2 thin film photo catalyst on porous steel fiber support,” Appl. Catal. B 95(3-4), 358–364 (2010). [CrossRef]  

6. H. Li, W. Zhang, L. X. Guan, F. Li, and M. M. Yao, “Visible light active TiO2-ZnO composite films by cerium and fluorine co-doping for photocatalytic decontamination,” Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 40, 310–318 (2015). [CrossRef]  

7. J. H. Yum, P. Walter, S. Huber, D. Rentsch, T. Geiger, F. Nüesch, F. De Angelis, M. Grätzel, and M. K. Nazeeruddin, “Efficient far red sensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 films by an unsymmetrical squaraine dye,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129(34), 10320–10321 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. T. Seto, Y. Kawakami, N. Suzuki, M. Hirasawa, S. Kano, N. Aya, S. Sasaki, and H. Shimura, “Evaluation of morphology and size distribution of silicon and titanium oxide nanoparticles generated by laser ablation,” J. Nanopart. Res. 3(2/3), 185–191 (2001). [CrossRef]  

9. D. Zhang, B. Gökce, and S. Barcikowski, “Laser synthesis and processing of colloids fundamentals and applications,” Chem. Rev. 117(5), 3990–4103 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. D. Di Yao, M. R. Field, A. P. O’Mullane, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, and J. Z. Ou, “Electrochromic properties of TiO2 nanotubes coated with electrodeposited MoO3.,” Nanoscale 5(21), 10353–10359 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. G. Malekshoar, K. Pal, Q. He, A. Yu, and A. K. Ray, “Enhanced solar photocatalytic degradation of phenol with coupled graphene based titanium dioxide and zinc oxide,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53(49), 18824–18832 (2014). [CrossRef]  

12. Z. C. Wang, X. F. Hu, and U. P. Helmersson, “Sol-gel preparation photochromic /electrochromic properties of Mo-Ti Oxide Gels and Thin Films,” J. Mater. Chem. 10(10), 2396–2400 (2000). [CrossRef]  

13. M. Miyauchi, A. Nakajima, T. Watanabe, and K. Hashimoto, “Photocatalysis and photoinduced hydrophilicity of various metal oxide thin films,” Chem. Mater. 14(6), 2812–2816 (2002). [CrossRef]  

14. A. Chithambararaj, N. S. Sanjini, A. C. Bose, and S. Velmathi, “Flower like hierarchical h-MoO3 new findings of efficient visible light driven nano photocatalyst for methylene blue degradation,” Catal. Sci. Technol. 3(5), 1405–1414 (2013). [CrossRef]  

15. M. Lu, C. Shao, K. Wang, N. Lu, X. Zhang, P. Zhang, M. Zhang, X. Li, and Y. Liu, “p-MoO3 nanostructures/n-TiO2 nanofiber heterojunctions: controlled fabrication and enhanced photocatalytic properties,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(12), 9004–9012 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. M. S. Jeon, W. S. Yoon, H. Joo, T. K. Lee, and H. Lee, “Preparation and characterization of a nano-sized Mo/Ti mixed photocatalyst,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 165(2-3), 209–216 (2000). [CrossRef]  

17. Y. Yang, X. J. Li, J. T. Chen, and L. Y. Wang, ““Effect of doping mode on the photocatalytic activities of Mo/TiO2,” J. Photo-chem. Photo-bio,” Chem 163, 517–522 (2004).

18. L. G. Devi and B. N. Murthy, “Characterization of Mo doped TiO2 and its enhanced photo catalytic activity under visible light,” Catal. Lett. 125(3-4), 320–330 (2008). [CrossRef]  

19. V. Štengl and S. Bakardjieva, “Molybdenum-Doped anatase and its extraordinary photocatalytic activity in the degradation of orange II in the UV and visible regions,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(45), 19308–19317 (2010). [CrossRef]  

20. M. Khan, J. Xu, N. Chen, and W. Cao, “Electronic and optical properties of pure and Mo doped anatase TiO2 using GGA and GGA plus U Calculations,” Phys. B. 407(17), 3610–3616 (2012). [CrossRef]  

21. K. Bhattacharyya, J. Majeed, K. K. Dey, P. Ayyub, A. K. Tyagi, and S. R. Bharadwaj, “Effect of Mo-Incorporation in the TiO2 Lattice: A mechanistic basis for photocatalytic dye degradation,” J. Phys. Chem. C 118(29), 15946–15962 (2014). [CrossRef]  

22. S. H. Elder, F. M. Cot, Y. Su, S. M. Heald, A. M. Tyryshkin, M. K. Bowman, Y. Gao, A. G. Joly, M. L. Balmer, A. C. Kolwaite, K. A. Magrini, and D. M. Blake, “The discovery and study of nanocrystalline TiO2-(MoO3) Core-Shell materials,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122(21), 5138–5146 (2000). [CrossRef]  

23. E. B. Santos, J. M. de Souza e Silva, and I. O. Mazali, “Raman spectroscopy as a tool for the elucidation of nanoparticles with core-shell structure of TiO2 and MoO3,” Vib. Spectrosc. 54(2), 89–92 (2010). [CrossRef]  

24. Y. Chen, J. Xiao, G. Wang, T. S. Zhang, F. Ma, Y. Gao, P. Zhu, C. L. Zhang, E. Xu, and Z. Li, “α-MoO3/TiO2 core/shell nanorods: Controlled-synthesis and low-temperature gas sensing properties,” Sens. Actuators B Chem. 155(1), 270–277 (2011). [CrossRef]  

25. N. Li, Y. Li, W. Li, S. Ji, and P. Jin, “One-Step hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2@MoO3 Core−Shell nanomaterial microstructure growth mechanism and improved photochromic property,” J. Phys. Chem. C 120(6), 3341–3349 (2016). [CrossRef]  

26. T. Schmitz, U. Wiedwald, C. Dubs, and B. Gökce, “Ultrasmall YIG nanoparticles with high coercivity at low temperature synthesized by laser ablation and fragmentation of pressed powders,” ChemPhysChem 18, 1–9 (2017).

27. K. Siuzdak, M. Sawczak, M. Klein, G. Nowaczyk, S. Jurga, and A. Cenian, “Preparation of platinum modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles with the use of laser ablation in water,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16(29), 15199–15206 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. A. Kubacka, M. Fernandez-Garcia, and G. Colon, “Nanostructured Ti–M mixed-metal oxides toward a visible light-driven photocatalyst,” J. Catal. 254(2), 272–284 (2008). [CrossRef]  

29. C. Liu, D. Yang, Y. Jiao, Y. Tian, Y. Wang, and Z. Jiang, “Biomimetic synthesis of TiO2-SiO2-Ag nanocomposites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5(9), 3824–3832 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. M. Kong, Y. Li, X. Chen, T. Tian, P. Fang, F. Zheng, and X. Zhao, “Tuning the relative concentration ratio of bulk defects to surface defects in TiO2 nanocrystals leads to high photocatalytic efficiency,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(41), 16414–16417 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

31. J. Yan, G. Wu, N. Guan, L. Li, Z. Li, and X. Cao, “Understanding the effect of surface/bulk defects on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2: anatase versus rutile,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15(26), 10978–10988 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

32. R. Streubel and B. Gökce, “High-productivity synthesis of ligand-free nanoparticles by laser ablation in liquids,” Proc. SPIE. in press.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 TEM images of the TiO2-MoO3 nanocomposites for 100 nm (a), and 50 nm (b), HR-TEM image of the nanocomposites (c), selected area EDS elemental mapping (d), Ti Kα1 (e), and Mo Kα1 (f).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of (a) TiO2, 1% MoO3-TiO2, 3% MoO3-TiO2, 6%MoO3-TiO2 and 9% MoO3-TiO2 nanocomposites, (b) Enlarged image showing MoO3 peak at 25.2° and 25.6°. (c) DRS spectra of TiO2, 1% MoO3-TiO2, 3% MoO3-TiO2, 6% MoO3-TiO2 and 9% MoO3-TiO2 nanocomposites, (d) Band gap calculation for MoO3-TiO2 nanocomposites.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 XPS spectrum of the nanocomposites (a), deconvoluted spectrum of Mo 3d3/2 into 231.6 and 232.2 eV (b), Ti 2p spectrum showing 457.8 eV and 463.8 eV binding energies (c).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 J-V graphs of the nanocomposites (a) and nyquist plots of the nanocomposites (b) for different MoO3 concentrations mixed with TiO2.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 MB dye degradation under visible light for TiO2 mixed with different MoO3 concentrations.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Photovoltaic and photocatalytic parameters of the nanocomposites

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.