Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Tunable surface plasmon-polaritons based on quantum coherence

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Tunable surface plasmons on the interface of a multilevel atomic medium with a cross coupling of the electric and magnetic components of a plasmonic field are investigated. The strong chirality resulting from the quantum coherence leads to some exciting properties of the surface plasmons. Compared to the traditional chiral-metal interface, surface plasmonic mode can still be found at the interface between such atomic media and a dielectric even when both the permittivity and the permeability of the medium are positive. This is in contrast to the conventional plasmonic systems where the signs of the permittivities or permeabilities on the two sides of the interface are opposite. We call this phenomenon an electromagnetically induced plasmon. Additionally, as the chirality and effective refractive index of the atomic medium are dependent on the intensity and phase of the controlling field, we can conveniently manipulate the properties of the surface plasmons.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Surface plasmons are electromagnetic excitations associated with charge density waves on the surface of a metal or a semi-conductor [1–15]. They have attracted tremendous interest to a wide spectrum of scientists, ranging from physicists, chemists to material scientists and have been explored for potential applications in nanophotonic devices [2, 3], quantum information [10] and solar cells [11]. One of the most attractive aspects of surface plamsons is the subwavelength character, which brings them unique capability to localize and manipulate electromagnetic field.

The simplest surface plasmonic structure consists of a plane interface between noble metal and dielectric. For such a structure, the transverse magnetic (TM)-polarized surface plasmonic dispersion relation can be obtained by solving Maxwell’s equations under the appropriate boundary conditions and have the form: kp=k0εdεm/(εd+εm). Here kp and k0 are the plasmonic and vacuum wave numbers, respectively. The permittivities of the metal, εm, and the dielectric medium, εd, must have opposite signs if surface plasmon has to become possible at such interface. Since most of the traditional materials have positive permeability, transverse electric (TE)-polarized surface plasmons exist in nonmagnetic materials. However, several systems supporting TE-polarized plasmons were found recently such as in metamaterials [12, 16] and graphene layers with appropriate doping density [17]. However, these kinds of TE-polarized surface plasmons suffer from huge losses and strong retarding effects. The proper utilization of such TE-polarized surface plasmons is therefore very challenging.

In this article, we investigate the plasmonic properties at an interface constructed by media with strong chirality [18–25] on one side and dielectric or metal on the other side. The chirality results from the quantum coherence between atomic levels [26, 27] as discussed in [22–25]. In their model, coupling a magnetic dipole transition coherently with an electric transition, which is similar to electromagnetically induced transmission, leads to electromagnetically induced chirality. We find that under certain conditions when both the permittivity and permeability of the atomic medium are positive, the interface of such a coherent medium and a typical dielectric can still support a plasmonic mode. This is in contrast to the traditional chiral-dielectric (metal) structure which demands for opposite signs of the permittivities on the two sides of the interface. In our model, strong chirality is prerequisite. As a consequence, we call this phenomenon electromagnetically induced plasmon. Besides, due to the strong cross coupling between the electric and magnetic components of the plasmonic field, the surface plasmons are no longer purely TM-polarized. The surface plasmons also have a much larger TE-polarized component compared to the traditional chiral medium [28–34], such as organic molecule with comparatively weak chirality. Meanwhile, as the chiral strength and the effective refractive indices of the atomic medium are field intensity and phase dependent, the plasmonic properties can be highly tunable. The investigation can play an important role in realizing low loss, controllable, and all dielectric plasmonic devices.

The paper is organized as follows: In Sec. 2, we present the detail of our model and discuss electromagnetically induced chiral materials with analytical expressions. In Sec. 3, we obtain the dispersion relation for the surface plasmons at the interface between such chiral media and a metal or a dielectric. The numerical results of the study are presented in Sec. 4 while Sec. 5 gives the concluding remarks.

2. Chirality

Our model is schematically shown in Fig. 1, where two infinite half space media join at x = 0 in the xz plane. The medium below the interface, with relative permittivity ε2, is considered to be a nonmagnetic noble metal or a dielectric, which is termed as medium 2. The medium above the interface, with relative permittivity ε1 and magnetic permeability μ1, is composed of atomic gas with strong chirality, which is termed as medium 1. In order to realize strong chirality, we choose the model investigated in [22–24] to be the atomic gas (medium 1) of the type as discussed in the following.

In this model, we need to coherently couple the electric dipole and magnetic dipole for the same probe field. This is achieved via a five-level atomic medium of the type shown in Fig. 1. Such a medium, as discussed in [21–24], can simultaneously control the sign of the refractive index, suppress the absorption, and are appropriate for media of interest (atoms, molecules, excitons, etc.). Here the levels |3〉 and |4〉 are opposite parity states that couple the electric field and the levels |2〉 and |1〉 are the same parity states that couple the magnetic field. For an electromagnetic wave propagating in medium 1, the electric and magnetic fields of the probe pulse can therefore couple with |4〉 − |3〉 and |2〉 − |1〉 transitions with electric dipole d34 and magnetic dipole μ21, respectively [24]. The magnetic dipole μ21 and the electric dipole d34 are coupled by the control laser which is resonant with the |3〉 − |2〉 transition. The associated Rabi frequency of the control laser is Ω˜c=Ωceiφ with Ωc and φ being its magnitude and phase, respectively and can be tuned conveniently. Two external laser fields with Rabi frequencies Ω1 and Ω2 can generate quantum coherence between levels |1〉 and |4〉 via a Raman transition through level |5〉 and prepares the atom in a superposition of these two states. Under this condition, the system behaves as a modified three-level electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) like system with ground state being the superposition of states |1〉 and |4〉 as discussed in [22, 24]. A number of parameters, such as the Rabi frequencies Ω1 and Ω2, the control field intensity Ωc and phase φ are tunable which makes the given model highly controllable.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Two infinite half media conjunct at x = 0 plane. A surface plasmon propagates along the z direction. The inset circle is the atomic energy structure of medium 1. Two strong external laser fields with Rabi frequencies Ω1 and Ω2 prepare a coherent superposition of states |1〉 and |4〉.

Download Full Size | PDF

By taking into account the fully coupling Rabi frequencies, the Hamiltonian of the system can be expressed as [23]

H=i=15ωiA|ii|+[12d34Eeiωt|34| 12μ˜21Beiωt|21|2Ω1eiω1t|51| 2Ω2eiω2t|54|2Ω˜ceiωct|32|+H.c.].

Here, ωiA (i=1,2,3,4,5) is the energy frequency of level |i〉, d34=3|ere^E|4 and μ˜21=cμ21=c2|μe^B|1 are the electric and magnetic dipole moments, and E and B are the amplitudes of electric and magnetic components of the weak probe field having a frequency ω, e^E and e^B are corresponding unit vectors of the fields. The field associated with Rabi frequencies Ω1 and Ω2 oscillate at frequency ω1 and ω2, respectively. In a real atomic system discussed in [23], Ω˜c for left- and right-circularly polarized waves are opposite due to the opposite signs of the corresponding dipole moments. The result is that the model shown in Fig. 1 does not correspond to a chiral medium. We can however use a two-photon excitation process to couple levels |3〉 and |2〉 with a strong coupling field (here Ω˜c) [35]. In such situation, Ω˜c is the same for both left- and right-circularly polarized waves which is responsible for strong coherence resulting in strong chirality.

We set Ωc to be much stronger than the Rabi frequency of the probe field. The atomic model has similarities to resonant nonlinear optics based on EIT. This allows us to neglect the populations of states |3〉 and |2〉, i.e., ρ33 and ρ22, and we can solve the three-level subsystem |1〉, |4〉, |5〉 undisturbed by the probe field. The solution for the Λ-type subsystem corresponds to the pure state [23, 24]

(Ω2|1Ω1|4)/Ω12+Ω22.

Here, the external lasers with Rabi frequencies Ω1 and Ω2 are strong coupling lasers and throughout the paper, we take Ω1=Ω2. It is also assumed that γ1,γ4γ5, where γi(i=1,2,3,4,5) are the decay rates for the corresponding energy levels. The state given by the above equation can be considered as the ground state of the system.

In such a system, the electromagnetic constitutive relations relating the polarization P or magnetization M of the medium with the electromagnetic fields E and H are [25, 27] (see Appendix A)

P=χeε0E+ξEHcH;
μ0M=ξHEcE+χmμ0H.

The physical scenario is that the polarization, given by the coherence of the transition |3〉 − |4〉, is not only induced by the electric field component but also by the magnetic field component of the probe field. Similarly, the magnetization, induced by the coherence of the transition |2〉 − |1〉, also gets a contribution from the electric field component. The coefficients in the above equations can be written as

ε1=1+χe=1+NLloc[αEE+N3(αEBαBEαEEαBB)],
μ1=1+χm=1+NLloc[αBB+N3(αEBαBEαEEαBB)],
ξEH=NLlocαEB,
ξHE=NLlocαBE,

with the denominator

Lloc=1NαEE3NαBB3 N29(αEBαBEαEEαBB).

In Appendix A, we show that the coefficients αEB and αBE are proportional to the density matrix element ρ41, which refers to the quantum coherence between levels |1〉 and |4〉. If ρ41=0, i.e., if there is no quantum coherence, the chirality will be zero and no surface plasmons exist on the interface between this kind of medium and the dielectric if both the permittivity and permeability are positive. However, as discussed above, we can achieve maximum coherence (ρ11=ρ44=ρ14=ρ41=1/2) when Ω1=Ω2 [see Eq. (2)], thus leading to maximum chirality.

Next we derive the expressions for the refractive indices. A consequence of chirality is that the refractive indices for two states of polarization are different. First we derive a propagating equation for the field by using the Maxwell’s equations

×E=Bt;×H=Dt; D=0;B=0

and the constitutive relations, i.e., D=ε0E+P and H=B/μ0M, along with Eqs. (3) and (4). We obtain

××E=2E=×(Bt) =iωμ1μ0×(H+ξHEcμ1μ0E) =ω2μ1μ0ε1ε0E+ω2μ1μ0ξEHcHω2ξHEcμ1μ0(H+ξHEcμ1μ0E) =ω2[μ1μ0ε1ε0(ξHEc)2]E+ω2μ1μ0(ξEHcξHEc)H.

The resulting equation,

2E+ω2[ε1ε0μ1μ0(ξHE/c)2]E +ω2μ1μ0(ξEH/cξHE/c)H=0,
is the Helmholtz type equation for the electric field E inside a chiral medium with non-vanishing chiral coefficients ξHE and ξEH. Note that Eq. (12) reduces to the usual Helmholtz equation for non-magnetic media when the chiral coefficients go to zero. Following this, the Helmholtz type equation for the magnetic field H can also be obtained in a similar fashion.

The solution of the above equation are two circularly polarized waves with propagation wave numbers (see Appendix B)

k±=n±k0 =k02[4ε1μ1(ξEH+ξHE)2±i(ξEHξHE)],
where k0=ω/c is the vacuum wave number and c is the vacuum velocity of light. The upper sign applies for the right-circularly polarized light and the lower sign for the left-circularly polarized light.

3. Dispersion relation of the surface plasmons

To derive the dispersion relation for the surface plasmon propagating in the z direction along the interface x = 0 between the two media [see Fig. (1)], we assume the field profiles of the form E1=(E1xe^x+E1ye^y+E1ze^z)eikzeiβ1xeiωt in medium 1 and E2=(E2xe^x+E2ye^y+E2ze^z)eikzeiβ2xeiωt in medium 2. Here, β1(2)=ε1(2)k02kz1(z2)2 is the normal component of the field E1(2) having wavenumber k1(2) inside the medium 1(2) and accounts for the the transverse decay of the field. Note that the z components of k1 and k2, i.e, kz1 and kz2, are the only field components which contribute to the eigen plasmonic wavevector such that kz=kz1=kz2k. We assume that the electric field component along y direction in medium 1 is of the form

E1y=i(a1b1),

where a1 and b1 denote the left- and right-circularly polarized components, respectively. By using Eq. (12), we obtain the magnetic field component as

H1y=1cμ1μ0ma1+1cμ1μ0m+b1,

where m± is given by

m±=12[4ε1μ1(ξEH+ξHE)2±i(ξEH+ξHE)].

The electric and the magnetic fields in the z direction are obtained to be

E1z=βnk0a1β+n+k0b1,

and

H1z=iβcμ1μ0nk0ma1iβ+cμ1μ0n+k0m+b1.

Here β±=n±2k02k2 are the transverse components of the corresponding left- and right-circularly polarized beams inside the medium 1. Similarly, we assume the electric fields in y and z directions in medium 2 to be in the form

E2y=a2,E2z=β2kb2.

The corresponding magnetic fields can be obtained by Maxwell’s equations as,

H2y=(β22ωμ0k+kωμ0)b2,H2z=β2ωμ0a2.

Making use of the boundary conditions for the field components in the two media along the interface, the continuity of the electric and magnetic field components requires

i(a1b1)=a2;βnk0a1β+n+k0b1=β2kb2;1cμ1μ0ma1+1cμ1μ0m+b1=(β22ωμ0k+kωμ0)b2;iβcμ1μ0nk0ma1iβ+cμ1μ0n+k0m+b1=β2ωμ0a2.

By solving the above set of equations, we obtain

(ε2βn+β2μ1m)(n+nβ2+β+μ1m+n)+(ε2β+n++β2μ1m+)(n+nβ2+βμ1mn+)=0.

This equation for the plasmonic wavenumber k (via the expressions for β± and β2) represents the dispersion relation of surface plasmons propagating along the interface shown in Fig. 1. A possible experimental setup for the realization of these electromagnetically induced plasmonic modes is to use Otto-type configuration. It is important to mention here that even though the present study develops an approach to study the properties of SPPs using electromagnetically induced chiral systems, the formalism can be equally applied to media with high structural chirality as well as metamaterials [19, 20, 36].

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 The permittivities, permeabilities, refractive indices and eigen surface plasmons versus the light frequency. Here, φ=π/2 and in (a) Ωc=60γp whereas in (b) Ωc=6γp. γp represents the non-radiative dephasing rate and is taken to be 103/s.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 The permittivities, permeabilities, refractive indices and eigen surface plasmons versus the control field Rabi frequency. (a) φ=π/4, ΔB=ΔE (b) φ=π/2 and (c) φ=π/4 but ΔB=2ΔE. The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Numerical results and discussions

In Fig. 2, we plot the real parts of the permittivity and permeability of medium 1 with two different values of ε2. We assume that ΔE=ΔB=Δ [21–27] and the atomic density is taken to be 5×1016cm−3, which is two orders of magnitude lower than those of the similar works [37, 38]. In the absence of any coupling field, the system effectively remains a three-level scheme with states |2〉, |3〉 and the dark state, i.e, the linear superposition of states |1〉 and |4〉 which allows us to assume the spontaneous decay rates of the two states γ1=γ4=0. Similarly, the magnetic response of a level transition is suppressed by four orders as compared to the electric response, therefore, the decay rates are taken to be γ3=γ5=1372γ2, where γ2=103/s, which accounts for realistic approaches [37, 38]. The plasmonic frequency is ω=3.14×1015 rad/s. Subsequently, the effective refractive indices for left- and right-circularly polarized lights can be obtained from Eq. (13), which are shown in Fig. 2(a2) and 2(b2). In Fig. 2(a), we assume that the medium 2 is a metal with permittivity ε2=2+0.1i and suppose that ε2 varies slowly in the frequency region that we are interested in. We can see that the real parts of ε1 and μ1 are always positive over a great range of probe field detunings and, therefore, the left- and right-circularly polarized fields are both right handed having positive refractive indices. In contrast to [22, 23], no negative refraction is achieved for any of the two beams inside the medium at these specific detunings. By using the dispersion relation given by Eq. (22), we can obtain the surface plasmon eigen modes, which are shown in Fig. 2(a4). The structure here behaves like a traditional chiral-metal interface and a single surface plasmon is supported when the detuning is small. Even though the refractive indices of the two circularly polarized fields have huge losses, the plasmonic wave number has a small imaginary part and can propagate a large distance.

In Fig. 2(b), the medium 2 is replaced by a dielectric with permittivity ε2=1. We notice that as the detuning decreases, ε1 changes from negative (metal) to positive (dielectric) values while μ1 remains positive. This is a direct consequence of the field profiles inside medium 2 which can alter the properties of the above medium (medium 1). In contrast to the previous case where medium 2 was supposed to be a metal, the left-circularly polarized field inside medium 1 shows left-handed property when the medium 2 is a dielectric. The later geometry can be of particular interest for plasmonic studies as: when Re(ε1)<0, the structure is similar to traditional metal-dielectric interface and supports a surface plasmon. However, a remarkable property is noted for certain detunings when Re(ε1)>0, we can still excite a surface plasmon on the interface. This result is contrary to the traditional surface plasmonic condition that at least one of the permittivities or permeabilities on the two sides of the interface should be negative. This phenomenon is analogous to the electromagnetically induced chirality in [22] and we call the results electromagnetically induced plasmon. This exciting property means that we can realize an all dielectric plasmonic structure using our model.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The corresponding wave numbers perpendicular to the interface of the surface plasmons as shown in Figs. 3(a4)–(c4).

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 The permittivities, permeabilities, eigen surface plasmons, versus the quantum coherence ρ41. Here, Ωc=6.145γp and ρ41=|ρ41|.

Download Full Size | PDF

In Fig. 3, we show that the properties of medium 1 and, consequently, the plasmonic wave number k as well as the propagation distance, defined by L=1/2π Imk, can be controlled by either controlling the coupling laser intensity or phase. In Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), we set the frequency detuning to be Δ=0.0215γp. Figures 3(a) correspond to the case where φ=π/4 while 3(b) correspond to the case where φ=π/2. When Ωc is small, the medium shows metallic characteristics with Re(ε1)<0. However, when Ωc is large, the medium becomes pure dielectric with Re(ε1)>0. Under both initial phases, the left-circularly polarized field displays left-handed property by having negative refractive index. A surface plasmon mode can be found at certain Ωc region. In Figs. 3(c), we set ΔB=2ΔE=0.043Γp and φ=π/4. We can see that compared with Fig. 3(a), where we assume ΔB=ΔE, a slight detuning shift of transition frequencies from |3〉 to |4〉 and |2〉 to |1〉 has a small influence on the dispersion relation of the surface plasmonic mode. However, large detuning difference means that the cross coupling effect diminishes, resulting in reducing the chirality. As a consequence, the detuning cannot be too large in our model. All the numerical results show that the properties of the chiral material and consequently the surface plasmons are highly dependent on Ωc as well as φ, hence the plasmonic properties of the structure can be controlled efficiently.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 The electric field distributions as a function of the distance to the interface. The electric fields decay as eIm(k)z along z direction. (a) is the field intensity. (b) and (c) are the real parts of the electric field at time 0 and π/2ω. Here |Ωc|=5.93γp and φ=π/4. Time dependent variations of the plasmonic field can be seen more clearly in the supplementary Visualization 1 and Visualization 2 .

Download Full Size | PDF

In Fig. 4, we plot the imaginary parts of the transverse (x) component of the plasmon wave number corresponding to different phases. It is shown that for the case when φ=π/4, both β and β+ have nearly the same values even at different detunings of the probe field [Figs. 4(a), 4(c)]. This again reveals the fact that the medium’s responses remains almost unchanged by slightly varying the probe field detuning from ΔB=ΔE [Fig. 4(a)] to ΔB=2ΔE [Fig. 4(c)]. This means that the left- and right-circularly polarized fields are almost symmetric and contribute only by a small fraction to the TE-polarized component of the electric field intensity. On the other hand, when the phase of the controlling field is taken to be φ=π/2, β and β+ have much difference and will contribute more [Fig. 4(b)]. This property defines the nature of the plasmonic modes and will be shown in Fig. 7.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 The ratio between the energy densities of TE- and TM-polarized components of the surface plasmons. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 3.

Download Full Size | PDF

As discussed in [22, 23], the quantum coherence ρ41 plays a key role in the strong chirality of the medium. In order to investigate the role of ρ41 on the surface plasmons, we plot the surface plasmonic mode dispersion as a function of ρ41 in Fig. 5(a). When ρ41 is small, even the medium shows metallic characteristics, no surface plasmons are supported. However, when ρ41 reaches a certain specific value, surface plasmons can be found beyond that region. Note that as ρ41 approaches its maximum value, i.e., 0.5 [see Eq. (2)], the medium displays dielectric characteristic but surface plasmons are still supported. As a consequence, this special surface plasmons coming from the strong chirality is highly related to quantum coherence. We have previously mentioned that the coherence term ρ41 is directly dependent on the Rabi frequency of the driving field Ωc, therefore making a comparison between Fig. 5(a) and Fig. 3(b2), we see that both the results are in good agreement. Figure 5(b) shows the longitudinal and transverse components of the left- and right-circularly polarized beams in the chiral medium. The two components decay faster when the coherence is maximum. Similarly, both the real and the imaginary parts of the plasmonic wavevector are higher when the coherence is high.

Due to the asymmetry of the left- and right-circularly polarized fields, the plasmons at a chiral-metal interface are no longer purely TE- or TM-polarized. In Fig. 6, we plot the electric field distributions as a function of the distance to the interface. Electric field along y direction can be found. At different intervals, the behaviors of the electric field components in three directions are different, which satisfies the signature of circularly polarized fields. A time dependent visualization of these variations can be seen in the supplementary Visualization 1 and Visualization 2. Visualization 1 shows the real parts of the electric fields along x axis due to the translational symmetry along y direction; while Visualization 2 shows the real part of the electric field Ey

in the xz plane. These figures clearly display the circularly-polarized signatures of the plasmonic fields.

In Fig. 7, we calculate the ratio of the two components of the plasmons at the interface, defined by the quantity

S=|Ey|2/(|Ex|2+|Ez|2),

which represents the ratio between the electric energy densities of TE- and TM-polarized components. In this figure, we see that for φ=π/4, the ratio is much smaller than that for φ=π/2. The reason is that the relative difference between the x components of the wave vectors for the left- and right-circularly polarized fields was much larger at φ=π/2 [see also Fig. 4]. At this specific phase, the asymmetry of the two fields is large and, consequently, a large y component of the field. Having similar variations as in Fig 4(a), when φ=π/4 and ΔB=2ΔE, we see that the relative difference of the x components of the wave vectors decreases first and then increases by increasing the control field. As a consequence, in order to increase the TE-polarized component, the asymmetry of the left- and right-circularly polarized fields can be effectively controlled by varying the control laser intensity and phase. Therefore, the results presented in Fig. 7 are in good agreement with that of Fig. 4.

A wide range of atomic, molecular, and condensed matter systems, such as dysprosium [22], have similar energy structures as used in our model. Here the probe field at 710nm is coupled with the electric transition between 4f105d6s, J = 8 and 4f95d26s, J = 7 and magnetic transition between 4f106s6p, J = 7 and 4f106s6p, J = 6. The Rabi frequencies are dependent upon different external laser fields, which can be varied independently. On the other hand, even the relation between ΔB and ΔE depends upon the atomic level structure, however, as discussed and shown above, a small detuning difference between them has a slight (almost negligible) influence on our results. In contrast, large detuning means that the cross coupling effect diminishes, resulting in reducing the chirality. Therefore, the detuning cannot be too large in our model. In a real experiment, a dielectric slab can be used to trap the atomic gas medium. To observe the surface plasmon between the atomic gas and the dielectric, we can use the Otto configuration with prism located in the dielectric. The incident field from the prism to the the atomic medium can be coupled tothe surface plasmons at the interface and, consequently, the reflection can be modified efficiently.

5. Conclusion

In this article, we investigated the electromagnetic properties of surface plasmons at the interface between a multilevel medium and a metal or a dielectric. The cross coupling resulting from the quantum coherence leads to strong chirality in the atomic system. In contrast to the traditional chiral material, the surface plasmonic mode can be found at the interface between the atomic medium and a dielectric even the permittivities and permeabilities of both media are positive. As the chiral strength and effective refraction depend on the control laser intensity and initial phase, we can control the plasmonic properties conveniently. In principle, these special surface plasmonic modes can also be found using structurally chiral media and metamaterials having strong chirality [19, 20, 36]. To implement this work experimentally, a possible scheme is to use the Otto configuration to observe the influence of the surface plasmons on the reflection of an incident beam. These results may have important applications on the controllable and an all dielectric plasmonic devices.

Appendix A

The evolution of the atomic density matrix can be solved using the methods described in Chap. 7 of [39], where we keep all orders of the driving field Ω˜c and treat the probe field in linear approximation. We obtain the steady-state values of all the density matrix elements. The induced polarization P and the induced magnetization M are proportional to ρ34 and ρ21 respectively, i.e., [21, 23]

P/ε0=Nd34ρ34/ε0=NαEEE+NαEBcB,
μ0M=Nμ0μ˜21ρ21=NαBEE/c+NαBBB.

Here N stands for atomic density of the material

αEE=i2ε0d342ρ44[γ42+i(ΔEδc)][γ42+i(ΔEδc)](γ34+iΔE)+|Ωc|2/4,αBB=i2ε0μ212ρ11[γ31+i(ΔB+δc)][γ31+i(ΔB+δc)](γ21+iΔB)+|Ωc|2/4,αEB=14ε0d34μ21ρ41Ωc[γ42+i(ΔEδc)](γ34+iΔE)+|Ωc|2/4,αBE=i4ε0d34μ21ρ41Ωc*[γ31+i(ΔB+δc)](γ21+iΔB)+|Ωc|2/4.}
Here ωij=ωiAωjA, d34(μ21)=3ε0γ3(γ2)c3/(4ω3), ΔE=ω34ωp, ΔB=ω21ωp, and δc=ω32ωc. Throughout the paper, we set δc=0. These solutions are only valid for ΔE=ΔB. The decay rates γ42=(γ4+γ2)/2, γ21=(γ2+γ1)/2+γp, γ34=(γ3+γ4)/2+γp, and γ31=(γ3+γ1)/2+2γp, where γp comes from the non-radiative dephasing [23].

Due to the higher density of atomic gas, we consider the local field effect. By making use of the Clausius-Mossotti-type local field corrections [22–24, 27]. The induced polarization P and the induced magnetization M have the following modified forms:

P/ε0=NαEEEloc+NαEBcBloc,
μ0M=NαBEEloc/c+NαBBBloc.
Here Eloc and Bloc are the local electric and magnetic fields. They have the following forms [40]
Eloc=E+P/3ε0,Hloc=H+M/3.

Making use of the relation Bloc=μ0Hloc [40], the expressions for the induced polarization and magnetization can be obtained as

P=NαEE(ε0E+P/3)+Nε0αEBcμ0(H+M/3),
M=NαBE(E+P/3ε0)/μ0c+NαBB(H+M/3).

These two equations are indeed Eqs. (3) and (4) after the directions of the fields are considered [23]. By solving the above two equations, we can obtain Eqs. (5)-(9).

Appendix B

For a wave propagating along z direction in the medium with a wave number k, the electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular to the propagation direction. The electric field can therefore be expressed as

E=E1xe^x+E1ye^y.

By using the constitutive relation H=(BξHEE/c)/μ1μ0 and Eq. (10), we obtain H=(k×E/ωξHEE/c)/μ1μ0 Then the corresponding magnetic field is [40]

H=[(kE1yωξHEE1xc)e^x+(kE1xωξHEE1yc)e^y]/μ1μ0.

On substituting these expressions for E and H into Eq. (12), we obtain the x and y components for the plasmonic field,

k2E1x+ω2[ε1ε0μ1μ0(ξHEc)2]E1xω2(ξEHcξHEc)(ξHEcE1x+kωE1y)=0,
and
k2E1y+ω2[ε1ε0μ1μ0(ξHEc)2]E1yω2(ξEHcξHEc)(ξHEcE1ykωE1x)=0.
If we set
Ξ=k2+ω2[ε1ε0μ1μ0(ξHEc)2]ω2(ξEHcξHEc)ξHEc
and
Λ=kω(ξEHcξHEc),
Eqs. (34) and (35) lead to
ΞΛ=E1yE1x=E1xE1y.
yielding
E1y=±iE1x,

Then we see that the eigen modes of Eq. (12) are circularly polarized waves. It follows, on substituting Eq. (39) into Eq. (34), that

k2+ω2[ε1ε0μ1μ0(ξHEc)2]ω2(ξEHcξHEc)(ξHEcikω)=0.

The eigen wave numbers are the solutions of the above equation and can be expressed as Eq. (13).

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (11274132, 11804219); Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) (8-352-1-074).

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

References

1. E. N. Economou, “Surface plasmons in thin films,” Phys. Rev. 182, 539–554 (1969). [CrossRef]  

2. W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424, 824–830 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. D. K. Gramotnev and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit,” Nature photonics 4, 83–91 (2010). [CrossRef]  

4. S. Lal, S. Link, and N. J. Halas, “Nano-optics from sensing to waveguiding,” Nature photonics 1, 641–648 (2007). [CrossRef]  

5. S-W. Zeng, D. Baillargeat, H-P. Ho, and K-T. Yong, “Nanomaterials enhanced surface plasmon resonance for biological and chemical sensing applications,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 3426–3452 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. Y. Fang and M. Sun, “Nanoplasmonic waveguides: towards applications in integrated nanophotonic circuits,” Light: Science and applications 4, e294 (2015).

7. E. Altewischer, “Plasmon-assisted transmission of entangled photons,” Nature 418, 304–306 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. D. E. Chang, A. S. Sørensen, P. R. Hemmer, and M. D. Lukin, “Quantum optics with surface plasmons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 053002 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. X-D. Zeng, G-X. Li, Y. Yang, and S. Zhu, “Enhancement of the vacuum Rabi oscillation via surface plasma modes in single-negative metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 033819 (2012). [CrossRef]  

10. A. V. Akimov, A. Mukherjee, C. L. Yu, D. E. Chang, A. S. Zibrov, P. R. Hemmer, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, “Generation of single optical plasmons in metallic nanowires coupled to quantum dots,” Nature 450, 402–406 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. H. A. Atwater and A. Polman, “Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices,” Nature materials 9, 205–213 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. X-D. Zeng, J-P. Xu, and Y. Yang, “Spontaneous emission interference enhancement with a μ-negative metamaterial slab,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 033834 (2011). [CrossRef]  

13. X-D. Zeng, L. Fan, and M. S. Zubairy, “Deep-subwavelength lithography via graphene plasmons,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 053850 (2017). [CrossRef]  

14. X-D. Zeng, Z. Liao, M. Al-Amri, and M. S. Zubairy, “Controllable waveguide via dielectric cylinder covered with graphene: Tunable entanglement,” EPL 115, 14002 (2016). [CrossRef]  

15. D. E. Chang, A. S. Sørensen, P. R. Hemmer, and M. D. Lukin, “Strong coupling of single emitters to surface plasmons,” Phys. Rev. B 76, 035420 (2007). [CrossRef]  

16. G. X. Li, J. Evers, and C. H. Keitel, “Spontaneous emission interference in negative-refractive-index waveguides,” Phys. Rev. B 80, 045102 (2009). [CrossRef]  

17. S. A. Mikhailov and K. Ziegler, “New electromagnetic mode in Graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 016803 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. J. B. Pendry, “A chiral route to negative refraction,” Science 306, 1353–1355 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. E. Plum, J. Zhou, J. Dong, V. A. Fedotov, T. Koschny, C. M. Soukoulis, and N. I. Zheludev, “Metamaterial with negative index due to chirality,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 035407 (2009). [CrossRef]  

20. I. Fernandez-Corbaton, M. Fruhnert, and C. Rockstuhl, “Objects of maximum electromagnetic chirality,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 031013 (2016).

21. D. E. Sikes and D. D. Yavuz, “Negative refraction with low absorption using Raman transitions with magnetoelectric coupling,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 011806 (2010). [CrossRef]  

22. J. Kästel, M. Fleischhauer, S. F. Yelin, and R. L. Walsworth, “Tunable negative refraction without absorption via electromagnetically induced chirality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 073602 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. J. Kästel, M. Fleischhauer, S. F. Yelin, and R. L. Walsworth, “Low-loss negative refraction by laser-induced magnetoelectric cross coupling,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 063818 (2009). [CrossRef]  

24. R. Fleischhaker and J. Evers, “Phase-controlled pulse propagation in media with cross coupling of electric and magnetic probe field component,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 063816 (2009). [CrossRef]  

25. D. E. Sikes and D. D. Yavuz, “Negative refraction using Raman transitions and chirality,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 053836 (2011). [CrossRef]  

26. P. P. Orth, R. Hennig, C. H Keitel, and J. Evers, “Negative refraction with tunable absorption in an active dense gas of atoms,” N. J. Phys. 15, 013027 (2013). [CrossRef]  

27. A. P. Fang, W. Ge, M. Wang, F. L. Li, and M. S. Zubairy, “Negative refraction without absorption via quantum coherence,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 023822 (2016). [CrossRef]  

28. G. Mi and V. Van, “Characteristics of surface plasmon polaritons at a chiral/metal interface,” Opt. Lett. 39, 2028–2031 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. A. N. Abdulrahman, Z. Fan, T. Tonooka, S. M. Kelly, N. Gadegaard, E. Hendry, A. O. Govorov, and M. Kadodwala, “Induced chirality through electromagnetic coupling between chiral molecular layers and plasmonic nanostructures,” Nano Lett. 12, 977–983 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. P. Pelet and N. Engheta, “The theory of chirowaveguides,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 38, 90–98 (1990). [CrossRef]  

31. N. Engheta and P. Pelet, “Surface waves in chiral layers,” Opt. Lett. 16, 723–725 (1991). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

32. K. M. Flood and D. L. Jaggard, “Single-mode operation in symmetric planar waveguides using isotropic chiral media,” Opt. Lett. 21, 474–476 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

33. J. A. Polo and A. Lakhtakia, “On the surface plasmon polariton wave at the planar interface of a metal and a chiral sculptured thin film,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 465, 87–107 (2009). [CrossRef]  

34. S. Bassiri, C. H. Papas, and N. Engheta, “Electromagnetic wave propagation through a dielectric–chiral interface and through a chiral slab,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1450–1459 (1988). [CrossRef]  

35. A. J. Traverso, B. Hokr, Z. H. Yi, L. Yuan, S. Yamaguchi, M. O. Scully, and V. V. Yakovlev, “Two-photon infrared resonance can enhance coherent Raman scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 063602 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

36. Z. Wu, X. Chen, M. Wang, J. Dong, and Y. Zheng, “High-performance ultrathin active chiral metamaterials,” ACS Nano 12, 5030–5041 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

37. Q. Thommen and P. Mandel, “Electromagnetically induced left handedness in optically excited four-level atomic media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 053601 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

38. M. Ö. Oktel and Ö. E. Müstecaplıoğlu, “Electromagnetically induced left-handedness in a dense gas of three-level atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 053806 (2004). [CrossRef]  

39. M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics, (Cambridge University, 1999).

40. D. M. Cook, The Theory of the Electromagnetic Field, (Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1975).

Supplementary Material (2)

NameDescription
Visualization 1       Time dependent visualization of the plasmonic field along x-axis.
Visualization 2       Time dependent variations of the y-component of the plasmonic field.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Two infinite half media conjunct at x = 0 plane. A surface plasmon propagates along the z direction. The inset circle is the atomic energy structure of medium 1. Two strong external laser fields with Rabi frequencies Ω1 and Ω2 prepare a coherent superposition of states |1〉 and |4〉.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 The permittivities, permeabilities, refractive indices and eigen surface plasmons versus the light frequency. Here, φ = π / 2 and in (a) Ω c = 60 γ p whereas in (b) Ω c = 6 γ p. γp represents the non-radiative dephasing rate and is taken to be 10 3 /s.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The permittivities, permeabilities, refractive indices and eigen surface plasmons versus the control field Rabi frequency. (a) φ = π / 4, Δ B = Δ E (b) φ = π / 2 and (c) φ = π / 4 but Δ B = 2 Δ E. The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The corresponding wave numbers perpendicular to the interface of the surface plasmons as shown in Figs. 3(a4)–(c4).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 The permittivities, permeabilities, eigen surface plasmons, versus the quantum coherence ρ41. Here, Ωc=6.145γp and ρ 41 = | ρ 41 |.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 The electric field distributions as a function of the distance to the interface. The electric fields decay as e I m ( k ) z along z direction. (a) is the field intensity. (b) and (c) are the real parts of the electric field at time 0 and π / 2 ω. Here | Ω c | = 5.93 γ p and φ = π / 4. Time dependent variations of the plasmonic field can be seen more clearly in the supplementary Visualization 1 and Visualization 2 .
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 The ratio between the energy densities of TE- and TM-polarized components of the surface plasmons. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 3.

Equations (40)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H = i = 1 5 ω i A | i i | + [ 1 2 d 34 E e i ω t | 3 4 |   1 2 μ ˜ 21 B e i ω t | 2 1 | 2 Ω 1 e i ω 1 t | 5 1 |   2 Ω 2 e i ω 2 t | 5 4 | 2 Ω ˜ c e i ω c t | 3 2 | + H . c . ] .
( Ω 2 | 1 Ω 1 | 4 ) / Ω 1 2 + Ω 2 2 .
P = χ e ε 0 E + ξ E H c H ;
μ 0 M = ξ H E c E + χ m μ 0 H .
ε 1 = 1 + χ e = 1 + N L l o c [ α E E + N 3 ( α E B α B E α E E α B B ) ] ,
μ 1 = 1 + χ m = 1 + N L l o c [ α B B + N 3 ( α E B α B E α E E α B B ) ] ,
ξ E H = N L l o c α E B ,
ξ H E = N L l o c α B E ,
L l o c = 1 N α E E 3 N α B B 3   N 2 9 ( α E B α B E α E E α B B ) .
× E = B t ; × H = D t ;   D = 0 ; B = 0
× × E = 2 E = × ( B t )   = i ω μ 1 μ 0 × ( H + ξ H E c μ 1 μ 0 E )   = ω 2 μ 1 μ 0 ε 1 ε 0 E + ω 2 μ 1 μ 0 ξ E H c H ω 2 ξ H E c μ 1 μ 0 ( H + ξ H E c μ 1 μ 0 E )   = ω 2 [ μ 1 μ 0 ε 1 ε 0 ( ξ H E c ) 2 ] E + ω 2 μ 1 μ 0 ( ξ E H c ξ H E c ) H .
2 E + ω 2 [ ε 1 ε 0 μ 1 μ 0 ( ξ H E / c ) 2 ] E   + ω 2 μ 1 μ 0 ( ξ E H / c ξ H E / c ) H = 0 ,
k ± = n ± k 0   = k 0 2 [ 4 ε 1 μ 1 ( ξ E H + ξ H E ) 2 ± i ( ξ E H ξ H E ) ] ,
E 1 y = i ( a 1 b 1 ) ,
H 1 y = 1 c μ 1 μ 0 m a 1 + 1 c μ 1 μ 0 m + b 1 ,
m ± = 1 2 [ 4 ε 1 μ 1 ( ξ E H + ξ H E ) 2 ± i ( ξ E H + ξ H E ) ] .
E 1 z = β n k 0 a 1 β + n + k 0 b 1 ,
H 1 z = i β c μ 1 μ 0 n k 0 m a 1 i β + c μ 1 μ 0 n + k 0 m + b 1 .
E 2 y = a 2 , E 2 z = β 2 k b 2 .
H 2 y = ( β 2 2 ω μ 0 k + k ω μ 0 ) b 2 , H 2 z = β 2 ω μ 0 a 2 .
i ( a 1 b 1 ) = a 2 ; β n k 0 a 1 β + n + k 0 b 1 = β 2 k b 2 ; 1 c μ 1 μ 0 m a 1 + 1 c μ 1 μ 0 m + b 1 = ( β 2 2 ω μ 0 k + k ω μ 0 ) b 2 ; i β c μ 1 μ 0 n k 0 m a 1 i β + c μ 1 μ 0 n + k 0 m + b 1 = β 2 ω μ 0 a 2 .
( ε 2 β n + β 2 μ 1 m ) ( n + n β 2 + β + μ 1 m + n ) + ( ε 2 β + n + + β 2 μ 1 m + ) ( n + n β 2 + β μ 1 m n + ) = 0 .
S = | E y | 2 / ( | E x | 2 + | E z | 2 ) ,
P / ε 0 = N d 34 ρ 34 / ε 0 = N α E E E + N α E B c B ,
μ 0 M = N μ 0 μ ˜ 21 ρ 21 = N α B E E / c + N α B B B .
α E E = i 2 ε 0 d 34 2 ρ 44 [ γ 42 + i ( Δ E δ c ) ] [ γ 42 + i ( Δ E δ c ) ] ( γ 34 + i Δ E ) + | Ω c | 2 / 4 , α B B = i 2 ε 0 μ 21 2 ρ 11 [ γ 31 + i ( Δ B + δ c ) ] [ γ 31 + i ( Δ B + δ c ) ] ( γ 21 + i Δ B ) + | Ω c | 2 / 4 , α E B = 1 4 ε 0 d 34 μ 21 ρ 41 Ω c [ γ 42 + i ( Δ E δ c ) ] ( γ 34 + i Δ E ) + | Ω c | 2 / 4 , α B E = i 4 ε 0 d 34 μ 21 ρ 41 Ω c * [ γ 31 + i ( Δ B + δ c ) ] ( γ 21 + i Δ B ) + | Ω c | 2 / 4 . }
P / ε 0 = N α E E E l o c + N α E B c B l o c ,
μ 0 M = N α B E E l o c / c + N α B B B l o c .
E l o c = E + P / 3 ε 0 , H l o c = H + M / 3 .
P = N α E E ( ε 0 E + P / 3 ) + N ε 0 α E B c μ 0 ( H + M / 3 ) ,
M = N α B E ( E + P / 3 ε 0 ) / μ 0 c + N α B B ( H + M / 3 ) .
E = E 1 x e ^ x + E 1 y e ^ y .
H = [ ( k E 1 y ω ξ H E E 1 x c ) e ^ x + ( k E 1 x ω ξ H E E 1 y c ) e ^ y ] / μ 1 μ 0 .
k 2 E 1 x + ω 2 [ ε 1 ε 0 μ 1 μ 0 ( ξ H E c ) 2 ] E 1 x ω 2 ( ξ E H c ξ H E c ) ( ξ H E c E 1 x + k ω E 1 y ) = 0 ,
k 2 E 1 y + ω 2 [ ε 1 ε 0 μ 1 μ 0 ( ξ H E c ) 2 ] E 1 y ω 2 ( ξ E H c ξ H E c ) ( ξ H E c E 1 y k ω E 1 x ) = 0 .
Ξ = k 2 + ω 2 [ ε 1 ε 0 μ 1 μ 0 ( ξ H E c ) 2 ] ω 2 ( ξ E H c ξ H E c ) ξ H E c
Λ = k ω ( ξ E H c ξ H E c ) ,
Ξ Λ = E 1 y E 1 x = E 1 x E 1 y .
E 1 y = ± i E 1 x ,
k 2 + ω 2 [ ε 1 ε 0 μ 1 μ 0 ( ξ H E c ) 2 ] ω 2 ( ξ E H c ξ H E c ) ( ξ H E c i k ω ) = 0 .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.