Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Tunable chiroptical response of graphene achiral metamaterials in mid-infrared regime

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We numerically investigate a tunable and extrinsic chiroptical response of a graphene achiral metamaterial in mid-infrared regime. The achiral metamaterial is composed of cascaded metallic split ring apertures and complementary graphene rings patterned on a dielectric layer. The strong extrinsic chiroptical responses of the metamaterial are allowed at oblique incidence and the integrated graphene can dynamically modulate extrinsic chirality by changing its Fermi level. The spectra of the chiroptical responses will show a blue shift with increasing the Fermi level of the patterned graphene. The maximal values of circular dichroism in the reflection and transmission modes can reach 80% and 50%, respectively. The maximal values of polarization rotation angle in the reflection and transmission modes can reach 80° and 60°, respectively. This graphene-based metamaterial design paves a way for a myriad of important terahertz (THz) and mid-infrared applications, such as optical modulators, absorbers and polarizers.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Optical activity is one of the most important optical effects in 3D chiral materials. Optical activity has attracted much attention due to significant applications in crystallography, spectroscopy, analytical chemistry and optics [1]. Optical activity can behave as circular birefringence (CB) and circular dichroism (CD) in dissipative media. CB is an ability to rotate the polarization state of light, while CD refers to differential transmission or absorption of circularly polarized waves. Although chiral objects are ubiquitous in nature such as DNA, viruses, and amino acids, their responses are quite weak so that chiral optical materials are usually bulky along light propagation direction compared with the wavelength. The advent of metamaterials offers a promising opportunity to realize giant artificial chirality for manipulating the polarization state of light [2–7]. On the one hand, optical activity has been widely observed in 3D-chiral metamaterials [8–13], in which they do not superimpose onto their mirror images. These metamaterials possess intrinsic chirality. On the other hand, the chiral effects can also be reported in intrinsically non-chiral metamaterials [14,15], provided that the whole arrangement formed by such metamaterial together with the wave vector of light cannot be superimposed upon its mirror image. This phenomenon is termed as extrinsic chirality, where two requirements are necessary, i.e., metamolecules without 2-fold rotational symmetry and the oblique incidence [15]. Recently, chiral or achiral metamaterials have developed rapidly to show a powerful polarization manipulation from microwave to optical frequencies [14–26]. For example, chiral and anisotropic metamaterials composed of subwavelength metallic building blocks have been proposed for enhancing CD [16–18] and optical activity [19–22], enabling various potential applications, such as broadband circular polarizers [23], wave plates [24] and chiral sensing [25,26].

Although many chiral and achiral metamaterials have been successfully proposed, the lack of tunability makes them not efficiently and flexibly work in practical applications. Therefore, achieving dynamic manipulation of electromagnetic waves is highly demanded and how to dynamically manipulate the polarization state has become a hot topic in the field of metamaterials. Instead of awkwardly engineered properties by metamaterials' geometrical parameters, a great deal of active materials have been added into chiral metamaterials to achieve dynamic manipulation of the polarization state such as semiconductors [27,28], chalcogenide glass [29,30], VO2 [31], indium-tin oxide [32], and especially graphene [33–36]. Graphene is a two-dimension material consisting of one monolayer of carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice. Its sheet conductivity can be continuously tuned within a broad frequency range by changing the Fermi energy levels via chemical or electrostatic doping, which enables excellent electrical and optical properties including high transparency, fast electrical modulation and on-chip integration [37,38]. Therefore, graphene has been recently applied to realize tunable optical properties and photonic devices from polarization conversion [33], wave plate [34], anomalous refraction [35,36], optical modulation and detection [38], biosensing [39] to broadband fiber polarizer [40], plasmonic antenna [41,42] and perfect absorber [43]. Several metamaterials with patterned graphene or graphene layer have been investigated to achieve intrinsic and extrinsic 2D chirality showing asymmetric transmission [44–46]. For polarization manipulation using intrinsic 3D chirality, chiral metamaterial has been demonstrated to electrically modulate circularly polarized waves, in which the hybrid metamaterial is constructed by conjugated double-Z chiral meta-molecules with integrated graphene layer [47]. Another hybrid chiral metamaterial consisting of gold U-shaped resonators and graphene grating has been reported to exhibit tunable mid-infrared CD with ~10% intensity [48]. Besides graphene, optical activity in monolayer black phosphorus has been reported due to extrinsic chirality, in which CD can be tuned from 6.5% to 14.7% at the incident angle of 79° by controlling the Fermi level of black phosphorus through chemical or electrostatic doping [49]. To our best knowledge, extrinsically chiral metamaterial allows the presence of strong chiroptical response [14], thus graphene achiral metamaterial will be expected to generate a strong and tunable chiral phenomenon.

In this work, we propose graphene achiral metamaterial and theoretically investigate chiroptical responses arising from extrinsic 3D-chirality in mid-infrared regime. The achiral metamaterial consists of cascaded metallic split ring apertures and complementary graphene rings that are patterned on a dielectric layer. The strong extrinsic chiroptical responses are only allowed in the metamaterial for oblique incidence and the integrated graphene can dynamically modulate extrinsic chirality by changing its Fermi level. The angular dependences of the extrinsic chiroptical responses are investigated as well. The proposed metamaterial scheme is of importance to realize active polarization modulator, biosensor and chiral detection.

2. Theoretical model

The achiral metamaterial is composed of three stacked layers, in which the top layer is gold split ring aperture resonators, the middle layer is structured graphene that is complementary to gold split ring aperture, and the lower layer is a dielectric substrate. The schematic diagram of the metamaterial with all geometric parameters is depicted in Fig. 1. The metallic split ring resonators are etched from a gold layer with the thickness ta = 50nm and the detailed dimensions are given below, p = 2000 nm, r = 850 nm, w = 150 nm, α = 160°, β = 140°. The open angles α and β are different. Herein, the incident waves propagate along the -z direction while the periodic boundary conditions are set along x and y directions. We numerically investigate the chiroptical response of graphene achiral metamaterials in the frequency range of 40-65 THz by use of the commercial software CST. In our simulation, the right-handed (RCP, +) and left-hand (LCP, -) circularly polarized waves are incident upon the metamaterial. The gold and graphene resonators lack two-fold rotational symmetry, thus the proposed hybrid achiral metamaterial will show extrinsic chirality with resonant optical activity when the tilted angle occurs around the symmetric axis of the metamaterial. At normal incidence, there is no extrinsic chirality. Therefore, the angle of incidence is set as 45° in the initial study. The patterned graphene is an array of asymmetrically split ring resonators that are an inverse design of the gold split ring apertures. The thickness of the graphene tg is 1 nm. The dielectric layer’s permittivity is 2.25 and its thickness ts = 200 nm. The gold is set as Drude model with the plasma frequency ωp = 1.37 × 1016 S−1 and the damping constant ωc = 4.08 × 1013 S−1 [50]. The conductivity of the monolayer graphene can be described by the Kubo formula [51,52]. The surface conductivity includes two terms: σg = σintra + σinter. σintra means the intraband electron-photon scattering, which can be described as:

σintra=ie2kBTπ2(ω-iτ1)[μckBT+2ln(exp(μckBT)+1)].
σinter can be written as the following form:
σinter=e24[12+1πarctanω2μc2kBTi2ln(ω+2μc)2(ω+2μc)2+(2kBT)2],
where e,kB,T,τ,μcmeans the electron charge, Boltzmann constant, temperature, momentum relaxation time and chemical potential. The electronic Fermi energy level of graphene can be tuned by external stimuli, correspondingly leading to the change of the sheet conductivity and relative permittivity. The dielectric constant of graphene can be obtained by ε=1+iσ/ε0ωt, where ε0 represents the vacuum permittivity, ω is angular frequency, and t = 1 nm is a typical value of the graphene thickness in the modeling and simulation. Here,σs(ω)=iEfe2/π(ω+iτ1), and Ef is the electronic Fermi energy level of graphene. Considering the practical scheme of actively controlled metamaterial, the patterned graphene can be tuned by electrostatic doping [53], illustrated by Fig. 1(c). If the large Fermi energy level is required, the chemical doping can also be applied to the patterned graphene before electrostatic doping. Thus, the patterned graphene metamaterial can provide an active polarization manipulation.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schematic views of the graphene achiral metamaterial (a) The stereogram view of a unit cell. (b) The front view of a unit cell. (c) The whole view of the graphene metamaterial. The circularly polarized wave propagates along -z direction. The patterned graphene can be tuned by electrostatic doping, illustrated by panel c.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Results and discussions

The reflection matrix Ekr=rkjEjinc relates the reflected wave Er to the incident wave Einc in terms of RCP and LCP waves. The same formula can be applied in the transmission. The reflection and transmission coefficients in terms of the power are given by Rkj=|rkj|2 and Tkj=|tkj|2. The phase of reflection and transmission will be described as arg r+-, arg r-+ and arg t, and arg t++, respectively. The extrinsic chirality of the achiral metamaterial is achieved by the tilted angle around the symmetric axis of the metamaterial.

The chiroptical response of the graphene achiral metamaterial is shown in Fig. 2, in which the angle of incidence is θ = 45° and the Fermi energy level of graphene Ef is set as 0.7eV. Here, reflection and transmission induced CDs can be expressed as ΔR=R+R+ and ΔT=TT++, corresponding to the reflection and transmission differences of RCP and LCP waves. The distinct reflection levels R+R+ can be obviously seen from Fig. 2(a). The maximal difference of R+- and R-+ happens at around 50 THz, and the reflective contrast exceeds 70%. Figure 2(b) shows the simulation results in the transmission mode, which indicates that the maximal difference of the transmission is about 40% at around 51 THz. At about 52.5 THz, the reflection and transmission CDs are vanished according to Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). The circular birefringence can be obtained from the phase difference. The circular birefringence in the reflection mode is defined as Δϕr=(argr+argr+)/2, while in the transmission mode it is defined as follows Δϕt=(argtargt++)/2. Figures 2(c) and 2(d) show the existence of the circular birefringence. As illustrated in Fig. 2(c), it can be noted that the maximum specular circular birefringence is about 40°. In addition, the maximum circular birefringence of the transmission can reach 50° according to Fig. 2(d).

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) Reflection spectra, (b) transmission spectra, (c) reflection phase and (d) transmission phase of circularly polarized waves for θ = 45° and Ef = 0.7eV.

Download Full Size | PDF

Graphene offers an advantage to dynamically tune the electromagnetic response of the metamaterial. We can modulate the extrinsic chirality of the graphene achiral metamaterial by changing the Fermi energy level. Figure 3 shows the optical properties in the achiral metamaterial for different Fermi energy levels. The peaks of all spectra will be blue shifted when the achiral graphene is added into the metamaterial. Meanwhile, the CD peak values of reflection and transmission are almost kept unchanged according to Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). It is easily concluded that the achiral metamaterial will own the nature of extrinsic chirality no matter there is a graphene or not. The CD peak values in the reflection and transmission will reach about 0.5 and 0.3 without graphene at θ = 45°. Figure 3(c) shows that the CB in the reflection can increase 5° with integrated graphene. While the peak amplitudes of the CB in the transmission slightly decrease after adding graphene in Fig. 3(d).

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 The tunable extrinsic chirality of the graphene achiral metamaterial. (a)-(b) The reflection and transmission induced CD spectra. (c)-(d) reflection and transmission circular birefringence spectra. (e)-(f) the absorption spectra of RCP and LCP waves at θ = 45° for different Fermi energy levels of graphene.

Download Full Size | PDF

Here, we calculate the absorption AL of the LCP wave as the formulaAL=1RR+TT+and the absorption AR of the RCP wave can be described as AR=1R++R+T+T++. In Figs. 3(e) and 3(f), it is noted that the AL and AR change slightly after adding graphene to the metamaterials. As the Fermi level increases, the peak absorption of LCP and RCP waves will be actively modulated. Both of the absorption spectra shift blue while the absorption values almost remain unchanged. Importantly, there is a large absorption difference of the LCP and RCP waves and as a result the tunable extrinsic chirality occurs in the hybrid achiral metamaterial at oblique incidence.

In order to fully understand the property of the hybrid achiral metamaterial, next the angular dependence of the extrinsic chirality is investigated, in which the Fermi level is fixed at 0.7eV. As shown in Figs. 4(a)-4(d), the extrinsic chirality are vanished with zero CD and CB for both reflection and transmission when the circular polarized waves are normally incident and the optical activity will be more pronounced by increasing the incident angle θ. The CD of the reflection and transmission could reach 80% when the angle of incidence θ is nearly equal to 80°. At about 52.5 THz, the CD values of both reflection and transmission approaches zero, but the rotatory power CB of reflection and transmission can reach about 40° (see Fig. 4c) and 60° (see Fig. 4d), in which it is well known as a pure circular birefringence. This results are consistent with Fig. 2. As seen from Fig. 4(e), the absorption AL in the achiral metamaterial can reach 40% at θ = 80° and the absorption peak occurs at around 48 THz. The absorption AR of the RCP is much less than one of the LCP within a wide range of incident angles in Fig. 4(f). Therefore, the proposed hybrid achiral metamaterial will yield strong extrinsic chirality with large CB and CD values within a wide angle range for both reflection and transmission modes and are more flexible to the polarization detection of chiral molecules.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The angular dependence of extrinsic chirality in the graphene achiral metamaterial. (a)-(b) The reflection and transmission CD spectra. (c)-(d) reflection and transmission CB spectra. (e)-(f) the absorption of LCP and RCP waves. The graphene Fermi energy is 0.7eV and the angles of incidence θ vary.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have studied tunable extrinsic chirality of both reflected and transmitted waves in graphene achiral metamaterial for a wide range of incident angles. The patterned graphene is exactly complementary to the metallic structure. The strong extrinsic chiroptical responses of the metamaterial are allowed at oblique incidence and the integrated graphene can dynamically modulate CD and CB spectra by changing its Fermi level. The peaks of the chiroptical responses will show a blue shift with increasing the Fermi level of the patterned graphene. The maximal CD values of reflection and transmission can reach 80% and 50%, respectively. The maximal CB values (rotatory power) of reflection and transmission can reach 80° and 60°, respectively. The proposed graphene achiral metamaterial offers a strong and tunable extrinsic chiroptical response for both reflection and transmission simultaneously and therefore provides more flexible opportunities to realize chiral sensing and polarization manipulation.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61875044, 61675054 and 91750107); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M600668); the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (ZD2018015); 111 project to the Harbin Engineering University (B13015) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Harbin Engineering University (HEU) of China.

References

1. L. D. Barron, Molecular light scattering and optical activity (Cambridge University, 2009).

2. A. V. Rogacheva, V. A. Fedotov, A. S. Schwanecke, and N. I. Zheludev, “Giant gyrotropy due to electromagnetic-field coupling in a bilayered chiral structure,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(17), 177401 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. M. Schäferling, D. Dregely, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Tailoring enhanced optical chirality: design principles for chiral plasmonic nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. X 2(3), 031010 (2012). [CrossRef]  

4. X. Yin, M. Schäferling, B. Metzger, and H. Giessen, “Interpreting chiral nanophotonic spectra: the plasmonic Born-Kuhn model,” Nano Lett. 13(12), 6238–6243 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. X. L. Ma, W. B. Pan, C. Huang, M. B. Pu, Y. Q. Wang, B. Zhao, J. H. Cui, C. T. Wang, and X. G. Luo, “An active metamaterial for polarization manipulating,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 2(10), 945–949 (2014). [CrossRef]  

6. E. Plum, V. A. Fedotov, and N. I. Zheludev, “Planar metamaterial with transmission and reflection that depend on the direction of incidence,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(13), 131901 (2009). [CrossRef]  

7. Y. Zhao, M. A. Belkin, and A. Alù, “Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers,” Nat. Commun. 3(1), 870 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. E. Plum, V. A. Fedotov, A. S. Schwanecke, N. I. Zheludev, and Y. Chen, “Giant optical gyrotropy due to electromagnetic coupling,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(22), 223113 (2007). [CrossRef]  

9. E. Plum, J. Zhou, J. Dong, V. A. Fedotov, T. Koschny, C. M. Soukoulis, and N. I. Zheludev, “Metamaterial with negative index due to chirality,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 79(3), 035407 (2009). [CrossRef]  

10. S. Zhang, Y. S. Park, J. Li, X. Lu, W. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Negative refractive index in chiral metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(2), 023901 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. Z. Li, K. B. Alici, E. Colak, and E. Ozbay, “Complementary chiral metamaterials with giant optical activity and negative refractive index,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(16), 161907 (2011). [CrossRef]  

12. M. Thiel, M. S. Rill, G. von Freymann, and M. Wegener, “Three-dimensional bi-chiral photonic crystals,” Adv. Mater. 21(46), 4680–4682 (2009). [CrossRef]  

13. E. Plum, “Extrinsic chirality: tunable optically active reflectors and perfect absorbers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(24), 241905 (2016). [CrossRef]  

14. E. Plum, X. X. Liu, V. A. Fedotov, Y. Chen, D. P. Tsai, and N. I. Zheludev, “Metamaterials: optical activity without chirality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(11), 113902 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. E. Plum, V. A. Fedotov, and N. I. Zheludev, “Specular optical activity of achiral metasurfaces,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(14), 141905 (2016). [CrossRef]  

16. M. Decker, M. W. Klein, M. Wegener, and S. Linden, “Circular dichroism of planar chiral magnetic metamaterials,” Opt. Lett. 32(7), 856–858 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. S. V. Zhukovsky, A. V. Novitsky, and V. M. Galynsky, “Elliptical dichroism: operating principle of planar chiral metamaterials,” Opt. Lett. 34(13), 1988–1990 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. T. Cao, L. Zhang, R. E. Simpson, C. Wei, and M. J. Cryan, “Strongly tunable circular dichroism in gammadion chiral phase-change metamaterials,” Opt. Express 21(23), 27841–27851 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. Y. Cui, L. Kang, S. Lan, S. Rodrigues, and W. Cai, “Giant chiral optical response from a twisted-arc metamaterial,” Nano Lett. 14(2), 1021–1025 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. M. Kuwata-Gonokami, N. Saito, Y. Ino, M. Kauranen, K. Jefimovs, T. Vallius, J. Turunen, and Y. Svirko, “Giant optical activity in quasi-two-dimensional planar nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(22), 227401 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. R. Zhao, L. Zhang, J. Zhou, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Conjugated gammadion chiral metamaterial with uniaxial optical activity and negative refractive index,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 83(3), 035105 (2011). [CrossRef]  

22. T. T. Kim, S. S. Oh, H. S. Park, R. Zhao, S. H. Kim, W. Choi, B. Min, and O. Hess, “Optical activity enhanced by strong inter-molecular coupling in planar chiral metamaterials,” Sci. Rep. 4(1), 5864 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. J. K. Gansel, M. Thiel, M. S. Rill, M. Decker, K. Bade, V. Saile, G. von Freymann, S. Linden, and M. Wegener, “Gold helix photonic metamaterial as broadband circular polarizer,” Science 325(5947), 1513–1515 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. C. Wu, H. Li, X. Yu, F. Li, H. Chen, and C. T. Chan, “Metallic helix array as a broadband wave plate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(17), 177401 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. M. Hentschel, M. Schäferling, X. Duan, H. Giessen, and N. Liu, “Chiral plasmonics,” Sci. Adv. 3(5), e1602735 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. Z. Wu, X. Chen, M. Wang, J. Dong, and Y. Zheng, “High-performance ultrathin active chiral metamaterials,” ACS Nano 12(5), 5030–5041 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. S. Zhang, J. Zhou, Y.-S. Park, J. Rho, R. Singh, S. Nam, A. K. Azad, H.-T. Chen, X. Yin, A. J. Taylor, and X. Zhang, “Photoinduced handedness switching in terahertz chiral metamolecules,” Nat. Commun. 3(1), 942 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. J. Zhou, D. R. Chowdhury, R. Zhao, A. K. Azad, H.-T. Chen, C. M. Soukoulis, A. J. Taylor, and J. F. O’Hara, “Terahertz chiral metamaterials with giant and dynamically tunable optical activity,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 86(3), 035448 (2012). [CrossRef]  

29. X. Yin, M. Schäferling, A.-K. U. Michel, A. Tittl, M. Wuttig, T. Taubner, and H. Giessen, “Active chiral plasmonics,” Nano Lett. 15(7), 4255–4260 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. T. Cao, Y. Li, C. W. Wei, and Y. M. Qiu, “Numerical study of tunable enhanced chirality in multilayer stack achiral phase-change metamaterials,” Opt. Express 25(9), 9911–9925 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

31. T. T. Lv, Y. X. Li, H. F. Ma, Z. Zhu, Z. P. Li, C. Y. Guan, J. H. Shi, H. Zhang, and T. J. Cui, “Hybrid metamaterial switching for manipulating chirality based on VO2 phase transition,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 23186 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

32. Y. Zhu, X. Y. Hu, Z. Chai, H. Yang, and Q. H. Gong, “Active control of chirality in nonlinear metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(9), 091109 (2015). [CrossRef]  

33. H. Cheng, S. Chen, P. Yu, J. Li, L. Deng, and J. Tian, “Mid-infrared tunable optical polarization converter composed of asymmetric graphene nanocrosses,” Opt. Lett. 38(9), 1567–1569 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

34. Y. Zhang, Y. Feng, B. Zhu, J. Zhao, and T. Jiang, “Switchable quarter-wave plate with graphene based metamaterial for broadband terahertz wave manipulation,” Opt. Express 23(21), 27230–27239 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

35. J. Li, P. Yu, H. Cheng, W. Liu, Z. Li, B. Xie, S. Chen, and J. Tian, “Dynamically tunable broadband infrared Anomalous Refraction Based on Graphene Metasurfaces,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 3(12), 1744–1749 (2016).

36. T. T. Kim, H. Kim, M. Kenney, H. S. Park, H. D. Kim, B. Min, and S. Zhang, “Amplitude modulation of anomalously refracted terahertz waves with gated-graphene metasurfaces,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(1), 1700507 (2018). [CrossRef]  

37. K. S. Novoselov, V. I. Fal’ko, L. Colombo, P. R. Gellert, M. G. Schwab, and K. Kim, “A roadmap for graphene,” Nature 490(7419), 192–200 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

38. Z. Sun, A. Martinez, and F. Wang, “Optical modulators with 2D layered materials,” Nat. Photonics 10(4), 227–238 (2016). [CrossRef]  

39. D. Rodrigo, O. Limaj, D. Janner, D. Etezadi, F. J. García de Abajo, V. Pruneri, and H. Altug, “APPLIED PHYSICS. Mid-infrared plasmonic biosensing with graphene,” Science 349(6244), 165–168 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

40. Q. Bao, H. Zhang, B. Wang, Z. Ni, C. Lim, Y. Wang, D. Tang, and K. Loh, “Broadband graphene polarizer,” Nat. Photonics 5(7), 411–415 (2011). [CrossRef]  

41. N. K. Emani, T. F. Chung, X. Ni, A. V. Kildishev, Y. P. Chen, and A. Boltasseva, “Electrically tunable damping of plasmonic resonances with graphene,” Nano Lett. 12(10), 5202–5206 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

42. Y. Yao, M. A. Kats, P. Genevet, N. Yu, Y. Song, J. Kong, and F. Capasso, “Broad electrical tuning of graphene-loaded plasmonic antennas,” Nano Lett. 13(3), 1257–1264 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

43. S. Kim, M. S. Jang, V. W. Brar, K. W. Mauser, L. Kim, and H. A. Atwater, “Electronically tunable perfect absorption in graphene,” Nano Lett. 18(2), 971–979 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

44. T. Cao, C.-W. Wei, L.-B. Mao, and S. Wang, “Tuning of giant 2D-chiroptical response using achiral metasurface integrated with graphene,” Opt. Express 23(14), 18620–18629 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

45. J. Zhao, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Tunable asymmetric transmission of THz wave through a graphene chiral metasurface,” J. Opt. 18(9), 095001 (2016). [CrossRef]  

46. H. Jiang, W. Zhao, and Y. Jiang, “High-efficiency tunable circular asymmetric transmission using dielectric metasurface integrated with graphene sheet,” Opt. Express 25(17), 19732–19739 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

47. T.-T. Kim, S. S. Oh, H.-D. Kim, H.-S. Park, O. Hess, B. Min, and S. Zhang, “Electrical access to critical coupling of circularly polarized waves in graphene chiral metamaterials,” Sci. Adv. 3(9), e1701377 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

48. Z. Huang, K. Yao, G. Su, W. Ma, L. Li, Y. Liu, P. Zhan, and Z. Wang, “Graphene-metal hybrid metamaterials for strong and tunable circular dichroism generation,” Opt. Lett. 43(11), 2636–2639 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

49. Q. Hong, W. Xu, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Optical activity in monolayer black phosphorus due to extrinsic chirality,” Opt. Lett. 44(7), 1774–1777 (2019). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

50. H. Cheng, S. Q. Chen, P. Yu, J. X. Li, B. Y. Xie, Z. C. Li, and J. G. Tian, “Dynamically tunable broadband mid-infrared cross polarization converter based on graphene metamaterial,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 103(22), 223102 (2013). [CrossRef]  

51. B. Zhao, J. M. Zhao, and Z. M. Zhang, “Enhancement of near-infrared absorption in graphene with metal gratings,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105(3), 031905 (2014). [CrossRef]  

52. B. Wang, X. Zhang, F. J. García-Vidal, X. Yuan, and J. Teng, “Strong coupling of surface plasmon polaritons in monolayer graphene sheet arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(7), 073901 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

53. Z. Fang, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, A. Schlather, P. M. Ajayan, F. H. L. Koppens, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas, “Plasmon-induced doping of graphene,” ACS Nano 6(11), 10222–10228 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic views of the graphene achiral metamaterial (a) The stereogram view of a unit cell. (b) The front view of a unit cell. (c) The whole view of the graphene metamaterial. The circularly polarized wave propagates along -z direction. The patterned graphene can be tuned by electrostatic doping, illustrated by panel c.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) Reflection spectra, (b) transmission spectra, (c) reflection phase and (d) transmission phase of circularly polarized waves for θ = 45 ° and Ef = 0.7eV.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The tunable extrinsic chirality of the graphene achiral metamaterial. (a)-(b) The reflection and transmission induced CD spectra. (c)-(d) reflection and transmission circular birefringence spectra. (e)-(f) the absorption spectra of RCP and LCP waves at θ = 45° for different Fermi energy levels of graphene.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The angular dependence of extrinsic chirality in the graphene achiral metamaterial. (a)-(b) The reflection and transmission CD spectra. (c)-(d) reflection and transmission CB spectra. (e)-(f) the absorption of LCP and RCP waves. The graphene Fermi energy is 0.7eV and the angles of incidence θ vary.

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

σ int ra = i e 2 k B T π 2 ( ω - i τ 1 ) [ μ c k B T + 2 ln ( exp ( μ c k B T ) + 1 ) ] .
σ int er = e 2 4 [ 1 2 + 1 π arc tan ω 2 μ c 2 k B T i 2 ln ( ω + 2 μ c ) 2 ( ω + 2 μ c ) 2 + ( 2 k B T ) 2 ] ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.