Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

A pulsewidth measurement technology based on carbon-nanotube saturable absorber

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We demonstrate a proof-of-concept saturable absorption based pulsewidth measurement (SAPM) by exploring the intensity dependent nonlinear transmission (i.e., saturable absorption) of low-dimensional material (LDM) carbon nanotubes. A minimum pulse energy of 75 fJ is experimentally detected with an average-power-peak-power product (Pav Ppk) of 5.44×107 W2 near 1550 nm. A minimum detectable pulse energy of 10 fJ with a Pav Ppk of 1.3×109 W2 is estimated with further optimization. The nanometer-level thickness and femtosecond-level decay time of LDMs allow ultrafast light interaction on a very small footprint, which potentially supports chip-scale characterization of ultrafast pulses with minimum distortion.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Autocorrelation (AC) is one of the key technologies to characterize ultrashort pulses. Autocorrelation based on second harmonic generation (SHG) has been a great success during the last few decades [1–6]. Moreover, technologies developed from SHG including frequency-resolved optical gating (FROG) [7–10] and spectral phase interferometry for directelectric-field reconstruction (SPIDER) [11–18], have enabled retrieval of pulse amplitude and phase information simultaneously. However, there are also some limitations caused either by technological or engineering issues [4, 5, 19]. For example, light at different wavelength may require phase matching by beam alignment to optimize the SHG efficiency in the SHG crystal. SHG crystal is difficult to be integrated with current optical integration platforms (Si, Si3N4, III-V materials, etc.). The fabrication of high-quality SHG crystal may also be costly.

Another autocorrelation technology based on two-photon absorption (TPA) effect in semiconductors has also been widely investigated [1, 20–30]. TPA effect allows very compact autocorrelator design [24, 25] and high detection sensitivity [21, 27]. TPA effect usually has picosecond decay time in bulk semiconductors which may lead to limitation on the measurement of pulse width [27–30]. Hybrid integration between semiconductors and insulators (e.g., Si3N4 or SiO2) is still challenging if the insulator waveguides are preferred to reduce the propagation loss of the pulses.

On the other hand, low dimensional materials (LDMs) including one-dimensional (1D) carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and various two-dimensional (2D) materials have shown abundant photonic and optoelectronic properties. Their saturable absorption(SA), i.e., intensity dependent nonlinear transmission, has been widely used for mode locking operation in pulsed lasers including carbon nanotube in [31, 32], graphene in [33–35], topological insulators in [36–39], transition metal dichalcogenides in [40–46], black phosphorus in [47–50] and MXene in [51], etc. Saturable absorption also enables the materials to be a nonlinear medium for pulse interactions, which is a key requirement for pulsewidth measurement technologies such as AC. Compared with TPA, most LDMs exhibit femtosecond-level decay time after photonic excitation which is promising for measuring ultrashort pulses with minimum distortion [30, 52–54]. The atomic level thickness of the LDMs also minimizes the potential pulse broadening caused by the optical dispersion in the bulk materials, which is another advantage to achieve ultrashort pulse measurement [54–57]. Moreover, hybrid integration between LDMs and planar waveguides or between LDMs and optical fibers has been developed with simple procedures [54, 56–59]. Therefore, pulsewidth measurement based on the saturable absorption of LDMs may provide a new technical route for pulse characterization, which is potentially capable of measuring ultrashort pulses and compatible with various integrated or non-integrated photonic platforms.

Meanwhile, it is known that an ideal intensity AC requires the nonlinear medium to have a response proportional to the square of pulse intensity, which is unfortunately not the case of saturable absorption in LDMs. However, if there is still a nearly linear relation between the input pulse width and the pulse width of measured trace, and the pulse width measurement error is controlled within a reasonable range, e.g., less than 10%, we can still treat this LDM based technology as a quasi-AC measurement considering its advantages mentioned above.

In this paper, we propose and demonstrate a proof-of-concept quasi-autocorrelation technology based on the saturable absorption of carbon nanotubes, called saturable absorption based pulsewidth measurement(SAPM). Low saturation intensity of CNTs allows low input pulse intensity and relatively large modulation depth of CNTs allows better measurement result. A minimum measurable pulse energy of 75 fJ is obtained limited by the system loss. The corresponding average-power-peak-power product (Pav Ppk) is 5.44×107 W2 and the measurement time resolution is 9.0 fs. By further optimizing the experimental setup, it is estimated that the specifications can be improved to 10 fJ for minimum pulse energy and 1.3×109 W2 for Pav Ppk. The measurement error of the pulse width is less than 6% due to the non-ideal AC measurement. We believe this work may pave the way to a new type of pulsewidth measurement technology which is capable of achieving pulse width measurement down to few-femtosecond level and is easy to be integrated to various photonic platforms.

2. Principle and simulation

An ideal AC measurement requires the nonlinear medium to have a response proportional to the square of input pulse intensity. On the other hand, it is known that an ideal AC measurement does not reflect the actual input pulse shape [60]. So from a more practical point of view, the most important function of an AC measurement is to obtain the input pulse width based on a linear relation given by the following equation:

τin=τAC/Ccon
where τin is the input pulse width, τAC is the pulse width of the measured AC trace, and Ccon is a conversion coefficient. For ideal intensity AC, Ccon = 1.414 for Gaussian pulse and 1.543 for soliton pulse [6]. As mentioned in the introduction section, saturable absorption of LDMs is not an ideal “intensity square” relation required by the intensity AC measurement. However, if the relation between the input pulse width and the pulse width measured by our proposed quasi-AC SAPM technology is still nearly linear, we can simply use a different coefficient Ccon in Eq. (1) to calculate the input pulse width. Moreover, in the following simulation and experiment investigation, readers will see that the actually measured SAPM trace based on LDM is very similar to an ideal AC trace based on SHG.

In the following part of this section, we will discuss the preparation of LDM carbon nanotubes, the characterization of their saturable absorption, the experimental setup of a CNT based SAPM system, and the modelling and simulation of such a SAPM system, respectively.

2.1. CNT preparation and characterization

A high-quality CNT thin film is the key component of our system. The single wall CNTs are synthesized by the catalytic chemical vapor decomposition method and the diameters are from 1 nm to 1.5 nm. Then CNTs are mixed with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) to form thin films with the following steps. Firstly, 0.5 mgmL−1 CNT dispersion is prepared by dispersing filiform CNTs in deionized water using an ultrasonic cleaner for five hours. The dispersing agent used in the experiment is sodium dodecyl benzenesulfonate. Secondly, the CNT dispersion is centrifuged at 12000 g for several hours, and upper supernatant is collected to reduce unwanted scattering losses from large-scale agglomeration. Thirdly, 10 wt% aqueous PVA solution and CNT dispersion are mixed at a volume ratio of 1 : 2 by a magnetic stirrer for three hours. Finally, the obtained CNT-PVA mixture is dropped on a Petri dish for a two-day evaporation and a CNT-PVA thin film is obtained. Figure 1(a) shows the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of CNTs and Fig. 1(b) shows the image of the fabricated CNT-PVA thin film. The CNT-PVA thin film is then cut into small pieces and sandwiched between two fiber connectors to form a saturable absorber as shown in Fig. 1(c).

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) Transmission electron microscopy image of CNTs. (b) CNT thin film. (c) CNT thin film transferred onto a fiber end. (d) Experimental setup of the CNT saturable absorption measurement. (e) Nonlinear saturable absorption characteristics of the CNT saturable absorber (data and fit). (f) Transmission spectrum of the CNT.

Download Full Size | PDF

The nonlinear saturable absorption property of the CNT is characterized by a standard two-arm measurement as shown in Fig. 1(d). A passively Erbium-doped mode-locked laser (MLL) with a repetition rate of 37 MHz and a pulse width of 560 fs is used as an optical source with variable output power. After passing through a protective isolator (ISO), the pulses are divided by a 99:1 coupler. 1 % power is directly measured by a power meter (denoted as power meter 1) as reference and 99 % output power propagates through the CNT saturable absorber and is detected by another power meter (denoted as power meter 2). A 10 dB fixed attenuator (ATT) is added between the CNT saturable absorber and the power meter 2 to maintain a suitable detection power range. Figure 1(e) shows the measured optical transmittance of the CNT saturable absorber under different incident pulse intensity. The red curve in Fig. 1(e) is the fitting curve using the following saturable absorption formula [40]:

T(I)=1ΔTexp(IIsat)AnsβI
where T is the transmittance, ΔT is the modulation depth, I is the incident optical intensity, Isat is the saturation intensity, Ans is the nonsaturable absorbance and β is the two-photon absorption (TPA) coefficient. From thedata in Fig. 1(e), the tested CNT saturable absorber has a modulation depth of 9.182 %, a nonsaturable absorbance of 35.12 %, a saturation intensity of 20.69 MW/cm2, and a TPA coefficient of 0.01928 cm2/MW. To avoid the ambiguity of the incident intensity in the two-photon absorption region, the proposed SAPM technology is working within the intensity region from 0 to 40 MW/cm2 where the CNT transmittance monotonically increases with the increase of optical intensity. The corresponding peak power is from 0 to 32 W in a standard single mode fiber (e.g., SMF-28) with a mode area of 80 μm2. Figure 1(f) shows the measured transmission spectrum of the CNT saturable absorber from 1500 nm to 1630 nm indicating the proposed CNT basedSAPM can work in a wide spectral range.

2.2. Experimental setup, theory and simulation

The experimental setup of the proposed system with the CNT saturable absorber is shown in Fig. 2(a). The all-fiber configuration is chosen to allow an alignment free system. A homemade passively mode-locked laser with a repetition of 100 MHz and a center wavelength of 1560 nm is used as the optical pulsed source. An optical pulse from the MLL is divided by a polarization beam splitter (PBS). One of the split pulse is modulated by an electro-optic modulator (EOM) with a 1 kHz sinusoidal signal (denoted as R(t)) and the other pulse propagates through a variable time delay line (DL, General Photonics MDL-002). A tunable attenuator (ATT) is added to balance the power of two paths. Two optical pulses are recombined by another PBS. Polarization-maintaining optical fiber devices are used to avoid the interference between two paths. The output of the PBS (denoted as P(t)) passes through the CNT saturable absorber. The output from the CNT saturable absorber (denoted as P1(t)) is detected by a photodetector (PD) and measured by a Lock-in Amplifier (LIA, Signal Recovery 7280) system. The setup is very similar to a conventional intensity AC system except that the nonlinear medium is CNT instead of SHG crystal.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) Experimental setup of the CNT based SAPM. (b) Simulated transmittance change of CNT saturable absorber with respect to different delay time.

Download Full Size | PDF

The principle of the proposed SAPM can be explained as follows. When two split pulses combine at PBS, the peak power of the combined output pulse is dependent on the time delay between two split pulses. The transmission of the CNT saturable absorber is dependent on the peak power of the incident pulse. Therefore, the output power from the CNT saturable absorber is monotonically determined by the time delay of two split pulses. By measuring the average output photocurrent from the PD, the SAPM pulse profile can be obtained. The LIA and EOM are utilized to improve the measurement precision. Figure 2(b) shows an example of simulation result of the dependence between the CNT transmission and the delay time with an input pulse full width at half maximum (FWHM)of 1 ps.

The theoretical analysis of the proposed system is performed as follows. The temporal pulse power profile from the MLL is assumed Gaussian and given by:

Pin=P0exp(t2τ2)
where τ is a measure of the pulse width and P0 is the peak power. The output pulse P(t) from PBS can be described as:
P(t)=R(t)α1P02exp[t2τ2]+α2P02exp[(ttdelay)2τ2]
where R(t) is the 1-kHz modulation sinusoidal signal, α1 and α2 is the power transmission of each arm and tdelay is the time delay between two arms. The output instant power of the CNT saturable absorber is then given by:
P1(t)=P(t)T(I)
where T(I) is the nonlinear transmission of the CNT saturable absorber in Eq. (2). Here a fast saturable absorber model is used. The case of a slow saturable absorber model will be discussed in the Discussion section.

As mentioned previously, saturable absorption does not provide an ideal AC function, so it is important to understand how our quasi-AC SAPM technology is different from an ideal AC. To compare, we choose four different input pulse types, i.e., Gaussian pulse, soliton pulse (sech2 shape) and pulse with tale ringing caused by third order dispersion. The simulation results are summarized in Fig. 3 shown below. All the pulses have a pulse width (FWHM) of 1 ps and a normalized peak power Pn of 1. Here the normalized peak power Pn is defined as the ratio of pulse peak power over saturation power of CNT saturable absorber. And the saturation power equals to Isat80 μm2 = 16.55 W for our CNT saturable absorber.

In Figs. 3(a)3(c), the SAPM traces are shown in red dashed lines for Gaussian pulse, soliton pulse and pulse with tale ringing, respectively. The insets are the pulse shapes of the input pulses. For comparison, we also calculate the ideal AC traces generated by SHG based AC, shown in black solid lines. It can be seen that in all three cases, the traces generated by our SAPM technology match well with the AC traces by SHG based AC. In the pulse peak and wing region of the traces, there do exist slight differences in three cases, shown in Figs. 3(d)3(f). These differences are caused by the non-ideal AC nature of saturable absorption.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Simulated CNT based SAPM traces (red) and SHG AC traces (black) for an input of (a) Gaussian pulse, (b) soliton pulse, and (c) pulse with tale ringing. Insets in (a)-(c): Input pulse shapes. (d)-(f) Zoomed views of wing region of the traces in (a)-(c). Insets in (d)-(f): Zoomed views of peak region of the traces.

Download Full Size | PDF

Moreover, it is known that Gaussian pulse and soliton pulse input can be separated by comparing the fitting with Gaussian and soliton functions in the SHG AC trace. This can also be achieved by our technology. In Fig. 3(e), we also fit the soliton SAPM traces with a Gaussian function (green). It can be clearly seen that Gaussian fitting is different from both two traces in the wing region.

In Fig. 3, both SAPM traces and SHG AC traces are normalized by the corresponding Ccon (in Eq. (1)) in time axis because Ccon for SAPM traces is different from Ccon for SHG AC traces as discussed above. For example, for SHG AC trace with Gaussian/soliton pulse input, the corresponding Ccon = 1.414/1.543. For SAPM trace with same Gaussian/soliton pulse input, the corresponding Ccon = 1.365/1.779. This treatment is to allow a direct comparison of the trace shapes. The calculation of Ccon in the SAPM technology will be discussed later.

A pulse pair input is also simulated to compare with SHG AC, shown in Fig. 4. The pulse width is 1 ps and the pulse spacing is 4 ps. Time axis is not normalized by Ccon this time because the pulse separation will be changed. It can be observed that 4 ps pulse spacing can be clearly observed and the ratio between the main peak and side peak is 2, which confirms the capability of our SAPM technology to detect pulse pair.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Simulation of pulse pair input for (a) SHG based AC and (b) CNT based SAPM. Inset: input pulse pair.

Download Full Size | PDF

Then we investigate the conversion coefficient Ccon in Eq. (1). Figure 5(a) shows the simulation result of the relation between the input pulse width and the pulse width of the SAPM trace. The pulse shape is Gaussian and the normalized peak power of input pulse is fixed to 1. A nearly linear relation confirms our previous assumption that Eq. (1) is still held in our CNT based SAPM except for a different Ccon. The corresponding Ccon =1.365.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Simulation of (a) SAPM pulse width with respect to the input pulse width and (b) SAPM pulse width with respect to the input pulse peak power. (c) Three-dimensional simulation.

Download Full Size | PDF

The situation when input pulses have different peak power is also studied. The simulation result of the relation between normalized input peak power and SAPM pulse width is shown in Fig. 5(b). The pulse shape is Gaussian and the input pulse width is fixedto 1. The normalized peak power is from 0.001 to 2 because the system is working on the monotonic region of CNT saturable absorber to prevent data ambiguity (P0<32W or Pn<1.93) as shown in Fig. 1(e).

It can be seen that, due to the non-ideal AC nature of saturable absorption, the SAPM pulse width increases with the increase of input peak power. This means for different input pulse peak power, there will be a different conversion coefficient Ccon, which is not desired. However, it is noted that the maximum change of Ccon is 0.17 when the normalized input peak power changes from 0.001 to 2. If we choose Ccon = 1.365 as a standard value (normalized peak power Pn = 1), the pulse measurement error induced by Ccon is less than 6% which is within a reasonable range.

A more complete three-dimensional simulation result is shown in Fig. 5(c) to indicate the dependence of SAPM pulse width on input pulse width and normalized peak power. The curves corresponding to Figs. 5(a) and 5(b) are also denoted.

Lastly, it is worth mentioning that the value of Ccon is dependent on the nonlinear transmission property of CNT (and other LDMs to be used). So a calibration procedure is needed to determine the value of Ccon in the system.

3. Experimental results

3.1. SAPM pulse profile

A typical SAPM experimental result is shown as red circles in Fig. 6(a). The horizontal axis is the time delay between two pulses and the vertical axis is the measured LIA signal amplitude. Each data point is averaged by 100 times to reduce the noise from the environmental perturbation. The input pulse has a bandwidth of ∼ 57.2 nm, a repetition rate of 100 MHz and a center wavelength of 1560 nm. The red curve is the fitted SAPM pulse profile using a Gaussian shape. The pulse width (FWHM) of the SAPM trace is ∼ 11.94 ps based on the Gaussian fit. The pulse is broadened by the fiber dispersion of the system. The calibration of the system will be discussed in the next paragraph. The inset of Fig. 6(a) shows an AC trace measured by a standard SHG autocorrelator (Femtochrome FR-103 XL) with a pulse width (FWHM) of 1.03 ps. The pulse is not transform limited due to the ∼ 1-meter long fiber pigtail from the laser. The pulse peak power at the input port of the system is 23.635 W and the peak power entering the CNT saturable absorber is 0.345 W (zero delay between two arms) due to dispersion induced pulse broadening and the system loss of 7.71 dB. The corresponding normalized peak power is 0.02. The Fig. 6(b) shows the SAPM trace of a soliton pulse with hyperbolic secant profile and the inset of Fig. 6(b) is the corresponding standard SHG AC trace.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 (a) SAPM trace (purple circles) and Gaussian fit (red line), inset: AC trace with standard SHG autocorrelator, (b) SAPM trace (purple circles), hyperbolic secant fit (red line) and Gaussian fit (blue dashed line), inset: AC trace with standard SHG autocorrelator.

Download Full Size | PDF

3.2. Influence of pulse width and peak power

The investigation on the influence of pulse width and peak power is also a calibration process for the system. The value of conversion coefficient Ccon is dependent on the saturable absorption of the nanomaterials. The all fiber setup allows alignment free but also induces pulse broadening by the dispersion, i.e., the group delay dispersion (GDD) with the units of ps/nm. So the calibration process is to determine Ccon and GDD of the SAPM system. A pulse train with fixed peak power and tunable pulse width is first generated. This pulse train is obtained by sending a pulse train from a mode-locked laser to the single mode fiber with different length. Fiber dispersion will broaden the pulse width. Meanwhile, the average power of the pulse train is adjusted so that the peak power is fixed. Then the pulse train is measured both by a standard SHG autocorrelator and by our SAPM system. Figure 7(a) shows four typical measured SAPM traces and their fitting curves for input pulses with four different pulse widths denoted on the figure. The traces are vertically offset to provide a clear view. Figure 7(b) summarizes the relation between the input pulse width and measured SAPM pulse width using our system. A linear fit is then plotted in red in Fig. 7(b). The relation between the measured SAPM pulse widths τSAPM and the input pulse widths τin is given by:

τin=(τSAPMΔτ)/1.217
where Δτ=10.687 ps is the pulse broadening in the system and the conversion coefficient Ccon = 1.217 assuming a Gaussian profile. The value of Ccon is close to the simulation result of 1.28 at Pn = 0.01 (5% error) mentioned in Fig. 5(a). The corresponding GDD is given by Δτ/Δλ = 0.187 ps/nm which is identical to the value directly estimated by the 11-m fiber length in the system, given by 17 (ps/kmnm) 11 (m) = 0.187 ps/nm.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 (a) SAPM traces with different input pulse width. (b) Relationship of the measured SAPM pulse width and the input pulse width. (c) SAPM traces with different input pulse power. (d) SAPM pulse width with respect to the normalized peak power.

Download Full Size | PDF

The influence of pulse peak power is also investigated when the input pulse peak power is increased from 46.6 W to 127.3 W at system input port corresponding to a normalized peak power Pn from 0.15 to 0.41 at the CNT saturable absorber. Four typical SAPM traces are shown in Fig. 7(c) with Pn denoted. Figure 7(d) summarizes the relation between measured pulse width and normalized peak power. It can be seen that when the normalized peak power is increased from 0.15 to 0.41 at the CNT saturable absorber, the measured SAPM pulse width is increased by 2%. This pulse broadening is due to the nonlinear transmission of the CNT. The red curve is the linear fit which is consistent with the CNT saturable absorption described in Eq. (2) and the simulation in Fig. 5(b).

To briefly summarize, there are 2 steps for the system calibration: Firstly, determining the conversion coefficient Ccon by comparing the input pulse widths (using SHG AC) and measured pulse widths of our SAPM traces using a certain pulse train. This step is necessary because Ccon is dependent on the nonlinear transmission property of LDM used. Secondly, determining the pulse broadening effect, i.e. group delay dispersion (ps/nm), caused by the fiber dispersion. This step can be removed in the future by applying a free-space system.

3.3. Stability and sensitivity

The stability of the system output is also investigated as shown in Fig. 8. Figure 8(a) shows a long-time SAPM traces (LIA signal train) obtained by measuring a known pulse 30 times which indicates that the measurement results are stable under environmental disturbance. Four typical measurement results with fitted pulse profiles are shown in Fig. 8(b). The data are vertically offset to give a clear view.

Figure 8(c) summarizes the measured pulse width deviation for each measurement similar to [1]. Blue circles represent the measured actual pulse width errors using SAPM technology according to Eq. (6) for 30 measurements with reference to the pulse width measured by the SHG autocorrelator. Red square (9.0 fs) represents the root-mean-square (rms) error of the measured pulse width. The error bar denotes the upper (21.6 fs) and lower (-17.6 fs) bound of the errors. The error histogram is shown in Fig. 8(d). The measurement error is mainly limited by the loss variation (0.6 dB) and the delay accuracy (∼ 10 fs) of the tunable delay line.

 figure: Fig. 8

Fig. 8 (a) Long-time stability test of the SAPM. (b) Four typical SAPM traces and their fit from (a). (c) Measurement error of the pulse widths. (d) Histogram of the error.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 9

Fig. 9 SAPM measurement with a pulse energy of 75fJ (-21.26 dBm average power).

Download Full Size | PDF

The sensitivity of our system is also studied. A variable optical attenuator with negligible excess dispersion is inserted before the input port to adjust the input average power. Figure 9 shows a typical SAPM trace with a minimum detectable input power of -21.26 dBm which in fact has exceeded the minimum measurable power of our SHG autocorrelator. The measured FWHM of SAPM pulse is 11.78 ps corresponding to an input pulse width (FWHM) of 895 fs according to Eq. (6). This calculated result has acceptable deviation (13.5%) in this low power condition compared with the actual input pulse width data in Fig. 6(a) (1029 fs (FWHM) measured at high power with SHG autocorrelator) and the corresponding single pulse energy is 75 fJ with a PavPpk of 5.44×107 W2 for the system.

4. Discussion

In this section, we compare the properties of two current AC technologies SHG and TPA with our quasi-AC SAPM technology, shown in Table I.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Property comparison among SHG, TPA and LDM based SAPM technologies

Firstly, SHG technology requires phase matching whereas TPA and SAPM technologies don’t which gives more flexibility in the beam alignment. Secondly, for integration, it is still challenging to integrate SHG crystal with current integration platform. TPA materials are compatible with semiconductor platform (e.g., Si or InP [24, 25]) but hybrid integration with insulator platform (e.g. Si3N4 or SiO2) is challenging and lossy. LDMs used in SAPM are relatively easy to be integrated to various platforms [54–57]. Thirdly, the recovery time of the nonlinear material is an important measure of the minimum measurable pulse width. The recovery time is nearly instant forSHG but from tens of picoseconds to nanosecond for TPA [61–63] (e.g. 25ps in [22] and 25ns in [64]) and from tens of femtoseconds to sub-picosecond for LDMs [52–54] (e.g. <30 fs for graphene [65], 280fs for CNT [66]). We simulate the influence of the recovery time for LDM saturable absorbers by using the slow saturable absorber model as follows [67]:

qt=qmqτRqP(t)EA
where q is the instant absorption, qm is the modulation depth, τR is the decay time, P(t) is the instant pulse power and EA is the saturation energy. As shown in Fig. 10(a), for an input pulse with of 1 ps the detected pulse width is broadened when the recovery time τR is increased. Four typical simulated SAPM traces are shown in Fig. 10(a) with recovery time denoted. Figure 10(b) summarizes the relation between simulated pulse width and recovery time and the inset is an enlarge view. Here we define a normalized recovery time (NRT) given by NRT = τR/input pulse width. It can be seen that when the recovery time is small compared with the input pulse width (NRT < 30%, corresponding to a recovery time less than 300 fs in this example), the pulse width calculated from the SAPM trace is slightly broadened, less than 10%, which is acceptable. The SAPM trace is well Gaussian fitted despite slightly pulse broadening (300 fs recovery time case, NRT=0.3) as depicted in Fig. 10(c). Whenthe recovery time is comparable or large than the input pulse width, the pulse broadening becomes serious. Moreover, the SAPM trace also becomes deformed from an ideal Gaussian shape, as shown in Fig. 10(d) (10 ps recovery time case, NRT=10).

 figure: Fig. 10

Fig. 10 (a) Four typical simulated SAPM traces with different recovery time and their fit. (b) Relationship of the measurement error and NRT, inset: measurement error against NRT when error is less than 10%. (c) Simulated SAPM trace (purple circles) and Gaussian fit (red line) with NRT equals 10. (d) Simulated SAPM trace (purple circles) and Gaussian fit (red line) with NRT equals 0.3.

Download Full Size | PDF

Lastly the material thickness is also important because a thinner material induces less dispersion and thus less pulse broadening. The typical thickness of these nonlinear materials is tens of microns to few millimeters for SHG crystals, sub-micron to few microns for TPA materials [30] and sub-nanometer to few nanometers for LDMs. Therefore, LDM based SAPM technology has advantages in beam alignment, integration and thickness. Its material recovery time is between SHG crystals and TPA materials.

Table II summarizes the specifications achieved by current SHG and TPA AC technologies as well as our LDM based SAPM technology. There are also other newly demonstrated pulse width measurement technologies including time-lens temporal imaging [68, 69], FWM-X-SPIDER [16], transverse second harmonic generation (TSHG) in nanowires [4], third-harmonic generation (THG) in photonic crystal waveguide [70] and graphene photodetector [71, 72]. Their specifications are also provided in Table II.

Tables Icon

Table 2. Different methods for pulse width measurement

Here we analyze the potential performance of our LDM based SAPM system. For operation bandwidth, a broadband LDM can be chosen to cover a wide wavelength range [54, 56, 57]. For minimum pulse width, the nanometer or sub-nanometer thickness and the ultrafast decay process of LDMs can support the measurement of pulse width down to few femtoseconds [52–54]. For the average-power-peak-power product and minimum measurable pulse energy, current system is limited by the loss (7.71 dB) mainly introduced by the EOM. If a better EOM with low insertion loss is chosen, or even the LIA is removed if the whole system is well isolated from the noise, the allowable single pulse energy sensitivity can be 10 fJ and the PavPpk can be improved to 1.3×109 W2 (corresponding to an average power of -21.26 dBm - 7.71 dB = -28.97 dBm). Choosing a saturable absorber material with even lower saturation intensity and higher modulation depth may further improve the sensitivity of the system to several ∼ fJ. For pulse width resolution, a better tunable delay line with less loss variation and better delay accuracy can potentially minimize the measurement error on the pulse width to sub-femtosecond level [1]. Free-space system may also be considered to avoid the dispersion effect.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have proposed and demonstrated a SAPM technology by using low dimensional nanomaterials based saturable absorber. In a proof-of-concept experiment with carbon nanotube, the SAPM system has a minimum measurable single pulse energy of 75 fJ, an average-power-peak-power product PavPpk of 5.44×107 W2, and a time resolution of 9.0 fs. By further optimizing the experimental setup, it is estimated that the system can potentially support fJ level pulse energy with fs pulse width. We believe this work may pave a new way for pulsewidth measurement which is potentially capable of measuring ultrashort pulses with high sensitivity and resolution. Our technology is also compatible to various integration platforms and can benefit the realization of a high-performance fully integrated pulsewidth measurement device.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61505105, 61875122); Open Fund of IPOC (BUPT).

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the helpful suggestions from Prof. Supradeepa, Indian Institute of Science.

References

1. J. Chen, W. Xia, and M. Wang, “Characteristic measurement for femtosecond laser pulses using a GaAs PIN photodiode as a two-photon photovoltaic receiver,” J. Appl. Phys. 121, 223103 (2017). [CrossRef]  

2. D. J. Bradley and G. H. C. New, “Ultrashort pulse measurements,” Proc. IEEE 62, 313–345 (1974). [CrossRef]  

3. A. Smolyaninov, M.-H. Yang, L. Pang, and Y. Fainman, “Plasmonic enhanced two-photon absorption in silicon photodetectors for optical correlators in the near-infrared,” Opt. Lett. 41, 4445–4448 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. C. Xin, S. Yu, Q. Bao, X. Wu, B. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, Z. Yang, and L. Tong, “Single CdTe nanowire optical correlator for femtojoule pulses,” Nano Lett. 16, 4807–4810 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. A. Hayat, A. Nevet, P. Ginzburg, and M. Orenstein, “Applications of two-photon processes in semiconductor photonic devices: invited review,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 26, 083001 (2011). [CrossRef]  

6. Femtochrome Research Inc, “Spec of rapid scanning autocorrelator model FR-103XL,” https://www.femtochrome.com.

7. R. Trebino, K. W. DeLong, D. N. Fittinghoff, J. N. Sweetser, M. A. Krumbügel, B. A. Richman, and D. J. Kane, “Measuring ultrashort laser pulses in the time-frequency domain using frequency-resolved optical gating,” Rev. Sci. Instruments 68, 3277–3295 (1997). [CrossRef]  

8. S.-D. Yang, A. M. Weiner, K. R. Parameswaran, and M. M. Fejer, “400-photon-per-pulse ultrashort pulse autocorrelation measurement with a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides at 1.55 μm,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2070–2072 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. D. N. Fittinghoff, J. L. Bowie, J. N. Sweetser, R. T. Jennings, M. A. Krumbügel, K. W. DeLong, R. Trebino, and I. A. Walmsley, “Measurement of the intensity and phase of ultraweak, ultrashort laser pulses,” Opt. Lett. 21, 884–886 (1996). [CrossRef]  

10. J. Gagnon, E. Goulielmakis, and V. Yakovlev, “The accurate FROG characterization of attosecond pulses from streaking measurements,” Appl. Phys. B 92, 25–32 (2008). [CrossRef]  

11. G. Stibenz and G. Steinmeyer, “Optimizing spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction,” Rev. Sci. Instruments 77, 073105 (2006). [CrossRef]  

12. J. Bromage, C. Dorrer, I. A. Begishev, N. G. Usechak, and J. D. Zuegel, “Highly sensitive, single-shot characterization for pulse widths from 0.4 to 85 ps using electro-optic shearing interferometry,” Opt. Lett. 31, 3523–3525 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. M. Anderson, A. Monmayrant, S.-P. Gorza, P. Wasylczyk, and I. Walmsley, “SPIDER: A decade of measuring ultrashort pulses,” Laser Phys. Lett. 5, 259–266 (2008). [CrossRef]  

14. C. Iaconis and I. A. Walmsley, “Spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction of ultrashort optical pulses,” Opt. Lett. 23, 792–794 (1998). [CrossRef]  

15. D. J. Moss, R. Morandotti, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “New CMOS-compatible platforms based on silicon nitride and hydex for nonlinear optics,” Nat. Photonics 7, 597 (2013). [CrossRef]  

16. A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, Y. Park, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, R. Morandotti, J. Azaña, and D. J. Moss, “Sub-picosecond phase-sensitive optical pulse characterization on a chip,” Nat. Photonics 5, 618 (2011). [CrossRef]  

17. I. A. Walmsley and C. Dorrer, “Characterization of ultrashort electromagnetic pulses,” Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 308–437 (2009). [CrossRef]  

18. D. A. Bender, J. W. Nicholson, and M. Sheik-Bahae, “Ultrashort laser pulse characterization using modified spectrum auto-interferometric correlation (MOSAIC),” Opt. Express 16, 11782–11794 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. G. Steinmeyer, “A review of ultrafast optics and optoelectronics,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 5, R1 (2003). [CrossRef]  

20. T. K. Liang, H. K. Tsang, I. E. Day, J. Drake, A. P. Knights, and M. Asghari, “Silicon waveguide two-photon absorption detector at 1.5 μm wavelength for autocorrelation measurements,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1323–1325 (2002). [CrossRef]  

21. J. M. Roth, T. E. Murphy, and C. Xu, “Ultrasensitive and high-dynamic-range two-photon absorption in a GaAs photomultiplier tube,” Opt. Lett. 27, 2076–2078 (2002). [CrossRef]  

22. G. Cong, M. Ohno, Y. Maegami, M. Okano, and K. Yamada, “Optical autocorrelation performance of silicon wire p-i-n waveguides utilizing the enhanced two-photon absorption,” Opt. Express 24, 29452–29458 (2016). [CrossRef]  

23. E. Z. Chong, T. F. Watson, and F. Festy, “Autocorrelation measurement of femtosecond laser pulses based on two-photon absorption in GaP photodiode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 062111 (2014). [CrossRef]  

24. K. Kondo and T. Baba, “On-chip autocorrelator using counter-propagating slow light in a photonic crystal with two-photon absorption photodiodes,” Optica 4, 1109–1112 (2017). [CrossRef]  

25. K. Kondo and T. Baba, “High-performance on-chip autocorrelator using a rib waveguide loaded with two-photon absorption diodes,” Opt. Lett. 43, 719–722 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. T. Sun, B. K. K. Fung, I. K. Sou, G. K. L. Wong, K. S. Wong, and G. Lanzani, “Two-photon absorption autocorrelation of visible to ultraviolet femtosecond laser pulses using ZnS-based photodetectors,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 14, 86–88 (2002). [CrossRef]  

27. J. K. Ranka, A. L. Gaeta, A. Baltuska, M. S. Pshenichnikov, and D. A. Wiersma, “Autocorrelation measurement of 6-fs pulses based on the two-photon-induced photocurrent in a GaAsP photodiode,” Opt. Lett. 22, 1344–1346 (1997). [CrossRef]  

28. D. Duchesne, L. Razzari, L. Halloran, R. Morandotti, A. J. SpringThorpe, D. N. Christodoulides, and D. J. Moss, “Two-photon photodetector in a multiquantum well GaAs laser structure at 1.55 μm,” Opt. Express 17, 5298–5310 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. D. Reid, W. Sibbett, J. Dudley, L. Barry, B. Thomsen, and J. Harvey, “Commercial semiconductor devices for two photon absorption autocorrelation of ultrashort light pulses,” Appl. Opt. 37, 8142–8144 (1998). [CrossRef]  

30. G. Cong, M. Okano, Y. Maegami, M. Ohno, and K. Yamada, “Interferometric autocorrelation of ultrafast optical pulses in silicon sub-micrometer p-i-n waveguides,” Opt. Express 26, 15090–15100 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

31. S. Y. Set, H. Yaguchi, Y. Tanaka, and M. Jablonski, “Laser mode locking using a saturable absorber incorporating carbon nanotubes,” J. Lightwave Technol. 22, 51 (2004). [CrossRef]  

32. S. Yamashita, Y. Inoue, S. Maruyama, Y. Murakami, H. Yaguchi, M. Jablonski, and S. Y. Set, “Saturable absorbers incorporating carbon nanotubes directly synthesized onto substrates and fibers and their application to mode-locked fiber lasers,” Opt. Lett. 29, 1581–1583 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

33. Q. Bao, H. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Ni, Y. Yan, Z. X. Shen, K. P. Loh, and D. Y. Tang, “Atomic-layer graphene as a saturable absorber for ultrafast pulsed lasers,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 3077–3083 (2009). [CrossRef]  

34. Z. Sun, T. Hasan, F. Torrisi, D. Popa, G. Privitera, F. Wang, F. Bonaccorso, D. M. Basko, and A. C. Ferrari, “Graphene mode-locked ultrafast laser,” ACS Nano 4, 803–810 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

35. M. Zhang, E. J. R. Kelleher, F. Torrisi, Z. Sun, T. Hasan, D. Popa, F. Wang, A. C. Ferrari, S. V. Popov, and J. R. Taylor, “Tm-doped fiber laser mode-locked by graphene-polymer composite,” Opt. Express 20, 25077–25084 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

36. M. Kowalczyk, J. Bogusławski, R. Zybała, K. Mars, A. Mikuła, G. Soboń, and J. Sotor, “Sb2Te3-deposited D-shaped fiber as a saturable absorber for mode-locked Yb-doped fiber lasers,” Opt. Mater. Express 6, 2273–2282 (2016). [CrossRef]  

37. Z. Luo, C. Liu, Y. Huang, D. Wu, J. Wu, H. Xu, Z. Cai, Z. Lin, L. Sun, and J. Weng, “Topological-insulator passively Q-switched double-clad fiber laser at 2μm wavelength,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 1–8 (2014). [CrossRef]  

38. J. Lee, J. Koo, Y. M. Jhon, and J. H. Lee, “A femtosecond pulse erbium fiber laser incorporating a saturable absorber based on bulk-structured Bi2Te3 topological insulator,” Opt. Express 22, 6165–6173 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

39. P. Yan, R. Lin, S. Ruan, A. Liu, H. Chen, Y. Zheng, S. Chen, C. Guo, and J. Hu, “A practical topological insulator saturable absorber for mode-locked fiber laser,” Sci. Reports 5, 8690 (2015). [CrossRef]  

40. K. Wu, B. Chen, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, C. Guo, C. Li, P. Xiao, J. Wang, L. Zhou, W. Zou, and J. Chen, “High-performance mode-locked and Q-switched fiber lasers based on novel 2D materials of topological insulators, transition metal dichalcogenides and black phosphorus: review and perspective (invited),” Opt. Commun. 406, 214 – 229 (2018). [CrossRef]  

41. D. Mao, Y. Wang, C. Ma, L. Han, B. Jiang, X. Gan, S. Hua, W. Zhang, T. Mei, and J. Zhao, “WS2 mode-locked ultrafast fiber laser,” Sci. Reports 5, 7965 (2015). [CrossRef]  

42. D. Mao, X. She, B. Du, D. Yang, W. Zhang, K. Song, X. Cui, B. Jiang, T. Peng, and J. Zhao, “Erbium-doped fiber laser passively mode locked with few-layer WSe2/MoSe2 nanosheets,” Sci. Reports 6, 23583 (2016). [CrossRef]  

43. H. Zhang, S. B. Lu, J. Zheng, J. Du, S. C. Wen, D. Y. Tang, and K. P. Loh, “Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) as a broadband saturable absorber for ultra-fast photonics,” Opt. Express 22, 7249–7260 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

44. S. Wang, H. Yu, H. Zhang, A. Wang, M. Zhao, Y. Chen, L. Mei, and J. Wang, “Broadband few-layer MoS2 saturable absorbers,” Adv. Mater. 26, 3538–3544 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

45. R. I. Woodward, E. J. R. Kelleher, R. C. T. Howe, G. Hu, F. Torrisi, T. Hasan, S. V. Popov, and J. R. Taylor, “Tunable Q-switched fiber laser based on saturable edge-state absorption in few-layer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2),” Opt. Express 22, 31113–31122 (2014). [CrossRef]  

46. J. Koo, Y. I. Jhon, J. Park, J. Lee, Y. M. Jhon, and J. H. Lee, “Near-infrared saturable absorption of defective bulk-structured WTe2 for femtosecond laser mode-locking,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 7454–7461 (2016). [CrossRef]  

47. Y. Chen, G. Jiang, S. Chen, Z. Guo, X. Yu, C. Zhao, H. Zhang, Q. Bao, S. Wen, D. Tang, and D. Fan, “Mechanically exfoliated black phosphorus as a new saturable absorber for both Q-switching and mode-locking laser operation,” Opt. Express 23, 12823–12833 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

48. Z.-C. Luo, M. Liu, Z.-N. Guo, X.-F. Jiang, A.-P. Luo, C.-J. Zhao, X.-F. Yu, W.-C. Xu, and H. Zhang, “Microfiber-based few-layer black phosphorus saturable absorber for ultra-fast fiber laser,” Opt. Express 23, 20030–20039 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

49. J. Sotor, G. Sobon, M. Kowalczyk, W. Macherzynski, P. Paletko, and K. M. Abramski, “Ultrafast thulium-doped fiber laser mode locked with black phosphorus,” Opt. Lett. 40, 3885–3888 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

50. S. B. Lu, L. L. Miao, Z. N. Guo, X. Qi, C. J. Zhao, H. Zhang, S. C. Wen, D. Y. Tang, and D. Y. Fan, “Broadband nonlinear optical response in multi-layer black phosphorus: an emerging infrared and mid-infrared optical material,” Opt. Express 23, 11183–11194 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

51. Y. I. Jhon, J. Koo, B. Anasori, M. Seo, J. H. Lee, Y. Gogotsi, and Y. M. Jhon, “Metallic MXene saturable absorber for femtosecond mode-locked lasers,” Adv. Mater. 29, 1702496 (2017). [CrossRef]  

52. J. M. Dawlaty, S. Shivaraman, M. Chandrashekhar, F. Rana, and M. G. Spencer, “Measurement of ultrafast carrier dynamics in epitaxial graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 042116 (2008). [CrossRef]  

53. K. Wu, X. Li, Y. Wang, Q. J. Wang, P. P. Shum, and J. Chen, “Towards low timing phase noise operation in fiber lasers mode locked by graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes at 1.5 μm,” Opt. Express 23, 501–511 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

54. S. Z. Butler, S. M. Hollen, L. Cao, Y. Cui, J. A. Gupta, H. R. Gutiérrez, T. F. Heinz, S. S. Hong, J. Huang, A. F. Ismach, E. Johnston-Halperin, M. Kuno, V. V. Plashnitsa, R. D. Robinson, R. S. Ruoff, S. Salahuddin, J. Shan, L. Shi, M. G. Spencer, M. Terrones, W. Windl, and J. E. Goldberger, “Progress, challenges, and opportunities in two-dimensional materials beyond graphene,” ACS Nano 7, 2898–2926 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

55. Y. M. Chang, H. Kim, J. H. Lee, and Y.-W. Song, “Multilayered graphene efficiently formed by mechanical exfoliation for nonlinear saturable absorbers in fiber mode-locked lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 211102 (2010). [CrossRef]  

56. M. Xu, T. Liang, M. Shi, and H. Chen, “Graphene-like two-dimensional materials,” Chem. Rev. 113, 3766–3798 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

57. G. R. Bhimanapati, Z. Lin, V. Meunier, Y. Jung, J. Cha, S. Das, D. Xiao, Y. Son, M. S. Strano, V. R. Cooper, L. Liang, S. G. Louie, E. Ringe, W. Zhou, S. S. Kim, R. R. Naik, B. G. Sumpter, H. Terrones, F. Xia, Y. Wang, J. Zhu, D. Akinwande, N. Alem, J. A. Schuller, R. E. Schaak, M. Terrones, and J. A. Robinson, “Recent advances in two-dimensional materials beyond graphene,” ACS Nano 9, 11509–11539 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

58. C. Qiu, Y. Yang, C. Li, Y. Wang, K. Wu, and J. Chen, “All-optical control of light on a graphene-on-silicon nitride chip using thermo-optic effect,” Sci. Reports 7, 17046 (2017). [CrossRef]  

59. K. Wu, C. Guo, H. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Wang, and J. Chen, “All-optical phase shifter and switch near 1550nm using tungsten disulfide (WS2) deposited tapered fiber,” Opt. Express 25, 17639–17649 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

60. J.-H. Chung and A. M. Weiner, “Ambiguity of ultrashort pulse shapes retrieved from the intensity autocorrelation and the power spectrum,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 7, 656–666 (2001). [CrossRef]  

61. P.-C. Heisel, J. Bergmann, W. Paa, W. Triebel, T. Zeuner, and H. Stafast, “197nm femtosecond laser-pulse duration: comparison of autocorrelation measurements,” Appl. Phys. B 112, 49–53 (2013). [CrossRef]  

62. F. Träger, Springer Handbook of Lasers and OpticsSpringer Science & Business Media2012 [CrossRef]  

63. L. P. Barry, B. C. Thomsen, J. M. Dudley, and J. D. Harvey, “Autocorrelation and ultrafast optical thresholding at 1.5 μm using a commercial InGaAsP 1.3 μm laser diode,” Electron. Lett. 34, 358–360 (1998). [CrossRef]  

64. A. Liu, H. Rong, M. Paniccia, O. Cohen, and D. Hak, “Net optical gain in a low loss silicon-on-insulator waveguide by stimulated raman scattering,” Opt. Express 12, 4261–4268 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

65. M. Breusing, C. Ropers, and T. Elsaesser, “Ultrafast carrier dynamics in graphite,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 086809 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

66. P. A. Obraztsov, A. A. Sirotkin, E. D. Obraztsova, Y. P. Svirko, and S. V. Garnov, “Carbon-nanotube-based saturable absorbers for near infrared solid state lasers,” Opt. Rev. 17, 290–293 (2010). [CrossRef]  

67. F. X. Kurtner, J. A. der Au, and U. Keller, “Mode-locking with slow and fast saturable absorbers-what’s the difference?” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 4, 159–168 (1998). [CrossRef]  

68. A. Pasquazi, Y. Park, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, F. Légaré, R. Morandotti, J. Azaña, and D. J. Moss, “Time-lens measurement of subpicosecond optical pulses in cmos compatible high-index glass waveguides,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 18, 629–636 (2012). [CrossRef]  

69. A. Tikan, S. Bielawski, C. Szwaj, S. Randoux, and P. Suret, “Single-shot measurement of phase and amplitude by using a heterodyne time-lens system and ultrafast digital time-holography,” Nat. Photonics 12, 228 (2018). [CrossRef]  

70. C. Monat, C. Grillet, M. Collins, A. Clark, J. Schroeder, C. Xiong, J. Li, L. O’faolain, T. F. Krauss, B. J. Eggleton, and D. J. Moss, “Integrated optical auto-correlator based on third-harmonic generation in a silicon photonic crystal waveguide,” Nat. Commun. 5, 3246 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

71. R.-J. Shiue, Y. Gao, Y. Wang, C. Peng, A. D. Robertson, D. K. Efetov, S. Assefa, F. H. L. Koppens, J. Hone, and D. Englund, “High-responsivity graphene-boron nitride photodetector and autocorrelator in a silicon photonic integrated circuit,” Nano Lett. 15, 7288–7293 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

72. K.-J. Tielrooij, L. Piatkowski, M. Massicotte, A. Woessner, Q. Ma, Y. Lee, K. S. Myhro, C. N. Lau, P. Jarillo-Herrero, N. F. van Hulst, and F. H. L. Koppens, “Generation of photovoltage in graphene on a femtosecond timescale through efficient carrier heating,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 437 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (10)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) Transmission electron microscopy image of CNTs. (b) CNT thin film. (c) CNT thin film transferred onto a fiber end. (d) Experimental setup of the CNT saturable absorption measurement. (e) Nonlinear saturable absorption characteristics of the CNT saturable absorber (data and fit). (f) Transmission spectrum of the CNT.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) Experimental setup of the CNT based SAPM. (b) Simulated transmittance change of CNT saturable absorber with respect to different delay time.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Simulated CNT based SAPM traces (red) and SHG AC traces (black) for an input of (a) Gaussian pulse, (b) soliton pulse, and (c) pulse with tale ringing. Insets in (a)-(c): Input pulse shapes. (d)-(f) Zoomed views of wing region of the traces in (a)-(c). Insets in (d)-(f): Zoomed views of peak region of the traces.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Simulation of pulse pair input for (a) SHG based AC and (b) CNT based SAPM. Inset: input pulse pair.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Simulation of (a) SAPM pulse width with respect to the input pulse width and (b) SAPM pulse width with respect to the input pulse peak power. (c) Three-dimensional simulation.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 (a) SAPM trace (purple circles) and Gaussian fit (red line), inset: AC trace with standard SHG autocorrelator, (b) SAPM trace (purple circles), hyperbolic secant fit (red line) and Gaussian fit (blue dashed line), inset: AC trace with standard SHG autocorrelator.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 (a) SAPM traces with different input pulse width. (b) Relationship of the measured SAPM pulse width and the input pulse width. (c) SAPM traces with different input pulse power. (d) SAPM pulse width with respect to the normalized peak power.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8 (a) Long-time stability test of the SAPM. (b) Four typical SAPM traces and their fit from (a). (c) Measurement error of the pulse widths. (d) Histogram of the error.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9 SAPM measurement with a pulse energy of 75fJ (-21.26 dBm average power).
Fig. 10
Fig. 10 (a) Four typical simulated SAPM traces with different recovery time and their fit. (b) Relationship of the measurement error and NRT, inset: measurement error against NRT when error is less than 10%. (c) Simulated SAPM trace (purple circles) and Gaussian fit (red line) with NRT equals 10. (d) Simulated SAPM trace (purple circles) and Gaussian fit (red line) with NRT equals 0.3.

Tables (2)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Property comparison among SHG, TPA and LDM based SAPM technologies

Tables Icon

Table 2 Different methods for pulse width measurement

Equations (7)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

τ i n = τ A C / C c o n
T ( I ) = 1 Δ T exp ( I I s a t ) A n s β I
P i n = P 0 exp ( t 2 τ 2 )
P ( t ) = R ( t ) α 1 P 0 2 exp [ t 2 τ 2 ] + α 2 P 0 2 exp [ ( t t d e l a y ) 2 τ 2 ]
P 1 ( t ) = P ( t ) T ( I )
τ i n = ( τ S A P M Δ τ ) / 1.217
q t = q m q τ R q P ( t ) E A
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.