Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Low-epsilon titanium oxide antenna infrared photodetector

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Optical antennas have high photoelectric transformation efficiency, and show great potential in various fields. However, it is very difficult to realize accurate fabrication even via the electron beam lithography because the size of an optical antenna is usually very small. Since it is difficult for the displacement current to flow in a low-epsilon material, the titanium oxide (TiOx) films with low-epsilon characteristics are fabricated for infrared detection via strictly controlling the oxygen content during the film deposition. The low-epsilon TiOx/Au bow-tie antenna with length of 3.7 μm is built, coupled with TiOx/TiO2/Au tunneling diode via in situ oxidation of TiOx that is covered by Au film. The rectifying antenna can convert an optical wave to direct current at about 900 nm. This work provides a new idea to surmount the small size limit of a noble metal optical antenna whose permittivity is heavily negative.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Transmission and conversion of the electromagnetic wave is an important way for optical detection and efficient utilization of green energy and, thus, has attracted great interest all over the world. As a major device component of the electromagnetic wave transmission and conversion, rectenna is widely used in high altitude vehicle, space solar power satellite, micro robot, radio frequency identification, sensor network, and the like [1–5]. Previously rectenna usually worked in microwave range. Nowadays it can be extended to optical range after more than 40 years' development [6–12].

Recently, the absorption mechanism of noble-metal based optical rectenna is considered to be antenna resonance and plasmon resonance. Since the size of near-infrared optical antenna is at the order of hundreds of nanometers, the fabrication process has a very important impact on the device performance [13–21]. Low-epsilon material shows similar properties to the epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) material, which is a new type of electromagnetic material with real part of epsilon (ε1) near to zero and limited imaginary part of epsilon (ε2) [22,23]. Displacement current plays a key role in noble metal optical antenna, while it is difficult for it to flow in the low-epsilon material. This unique property can effectively inhibit the plasmon resonance and surmount the fabrication difficulty caused by the antenna size reduction [24–28]. Specifically, the materials with low-epsilon characteristics are expected to show notable response to infrared light, whose wavelength is slightly shorter than that of ENZ point [23].

In addition, a tunneling diode made of two metal electrodes with different work function can be used for optical antenna rectifying without bias [29–34]. The structure of Ti-Au antenna coupled with the Ti/TiO2/Au tunneling diode is simple, which can work without bias [35]. However, a real rectenna may exhibit a low rectifying ratio, even in the case with an extremely small fabrication error during the preparation. Thus, the photocurrent cannot be detected in this system. One possible reason may be the uncontrollable quality of Ti and TiO2 films. Ti metal film can be readily oxidized, which can influence permittivity notably without an obvious change in the conductivity and, thereby, rectifying property of the devices can be affected [36]. Therefore, here a TiOx/TiO2/Au tunneling diode coupled with TiOx/Au antenna was constructed. The influence of oxygen content in TiOx on the film permittivity and device rectifying property was studied thoroughly. The low-epsilon TiOx films were obtained by controlling the deposition conditions very carefully. The TiOx/TiO2/Au tunneling diode was built using high permittivity TiO2 prepared via in situ oxidation. Eventually, the infrared responsive rectenna was obtained.

2. Low-epsilon rectenna

The scale of optical antenna should be around hundreds of nanometers because its effective length is larger than the physical length due to the non-zero imaginary displacement current at both ends. In contrast, TiOx low-epsilon material shows a low imaginary part of displacement current, giving rise to a weak plasmon resonance. The diagram of a rectenna with silica substrate (ε1 ~2.5, ε2 ~0) is shown in Fig. 1(a). The antenna length (L), triangular length (W), lead wire width (W1), film thickness of Au and TiOx (d), and vertex angle (θ) are 3.7 μm, 2.3 μm, 100 nm, 100 nm, and 60°, respectively. The diagram of metal-insulator-metal (MIM) tunneling diode with 3-nm thick TiO2 as the insulator is shown in Fig. 1(b). All the parameters used here were chosen according to the optimized parameters of a rectenna model reported previously [36,37], except the permittivity of TiOx.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Diagram of (a) rectenna and (b) MIM tunneling diode.

Download Full Size | PDF

2.1 Low-epsilon materials characteristics

Au and TiOx films were deposited in a vacuum chamber with a base pressure of 5.0E-7 Torr. An adhesive layer (5-nm thick Cr) was deposited, followed by the 95-nm thick Au film. Three different TiOx samples (named respectively as TiOx-1, TiOx-2 and TiOx-3) were obtained via sputtering at room temperature by decreasing the oxygen flow from 0.05 to 0.02, and, finally 0.00 sccm. SEM cross-section images (N-430, FEI, USA) in Figs. 2(a)-2(d) of the obtained TiOx and Au films indicate that the thickness is about 100 nm. Figure 2(e) shows the XRD patterns of a typical TiOx film as well as the standard samples. The TiOx film is amorphous in nature and, thus, exhibits no obvious diffraction peaks of Ti (PDF #44-1294) or TiO2 (PDF #21-1276 and PDF #21-1272). The major diffuse scattering broadband pattern between 10° and 50° indicates the presence of amorphous SiO2 and TiOx films on the crystalline silicon substrate with (400) diffraction peak (PDF #27-1402), which is consistent with the growth direction of silicon (100).

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 SEM cross-section images of (a) TiOx-1, (b) TiOx-2, (c) TiOx-3 and (d) Au films. (e) XRD parrterns of TiOx compared with standard Si, Ti, rutile TiO2 and anatase TiO2 from MDI Jade 6.

Download Full Size | PDF

The component analysis is done by Rutherford backscattering analysis (RBS, General Ionex Corporation, GIC4117, USA) using a 2 MeV He+ beam with a scattering angle of 165° in 60° incidence. The SIMNRA 6.06 software is employed to analyze the RBS data. Inset (I) of Fig. 3(a) shows the fitting structure by tuning the thickness of TiOx film and the content of Ti and O, and 1-μm silica is a substrate thick enough, as the incident energy of He+ becomes very low upon decay in the silica. Inset (II) of Fig. 3(a) is the zoom-in RBS spectra in oxygen range. In Fig. 3(a), the oxygen content is about 40%, 37% and 32% for TiOx-1, TiOx-2 and TiOx-3, respectively. Thus, the oxygen content of TiOx films decreases and the Ti content increases in the sequence of TiOx-1, TiOx-2 and TiOx-3. TiO2 films are prepared via in situ oxidization of three lead wire with different TiOx using oxygen plasma processor (PJ-2, AST Products, USA). Inset (I) of Fig. 3(b) shows the fitting structure by tuning the thickness and content of Ti and O in the TiO2/TiOx film. An enhanced obvious shoulder is observed at high energy of O in the inset (II) of Fig. 3(b), indicating that a TiO2 film is formed with the oxygen content of 67%, in which the oxygen content is notably higher than that of the corresponding TiOx films shown in Fig. 3(a).

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 RBS spectra of (a) TiOx films and (b) TiO2/TiOx films on silica. (c) Raw and fitting Psi curves of TiOx films. (d) Raw and fitting Psi curves of TiO2/TiOx films. (e) Raw and fitting Delta curves of TiOx films. (f) Raw and fitting Delta curves of TiO2/TiOx films. (g) Real and (i) Imaginary part of permittivity of TiOx-1, TiOx-2, TiOx-3 and Ti-Kirillova. (h) Real and (j) Imaginary part of permittivity of TiO2-1, TiO2-2, TiO2-3 and rutile TiO2-Palik. Insets of (I) in (a), (I) in (b), (c) and (d) are the corresponding fitting structure. Insets of (II) in (a) and (b) are the zoom-in RBS spectra.

Download Full Size | PDF

Ellipsometric spectroscopy (SE850, Sentech, Germany) with SpectraRay3 software is used to study the thicknesses and optical properties of the obtained TiOx and TiO2 films. The obtained ellipsometric spectra of TiOx, TiO2 and silica are fitted respectively by the model of Drude-Lorentz, Tauc-Lorentz and Cauthy. The inset of Fig. 3(c) presents the fitting structure with four layers of air/TiOx-n/SiO2/Si (n = 1, 2 and 3). The raw and fitting curves of Psi-Delta values of TiOx-n (n = 1, 2 and 3) films on the SiO2/Si substrate are shown in Figs. 3(c) and 3(e). The thickness of TiOx films is around 100 ± 3 nm. The permittivity of TiOx-n (n = 1, 2 and 3) is shown in Figs. 3(g) and 3(i). The real part of permittivity (ε1) decreases as the oxygen content decreasing in the range of 750 ~2000 nm (Fig. 3(g)). Obviously, the obtained TiOx films are typical low-epsilon materials compared to Ti-Kirillova [38], which is also measured by ellipsometric spectroscopy. The TiOx_3 has a similar permittivity to Ti film measured by Perkin-Elmer spectrophotometer previously [39]. Moreover, the ε1 of TiOx-3 is between −0.4 and 0 in 750 ~1070 nm (λENZ), indicating the interaction of free electrons and photons. So TiOx-3 is a low-epsilon material while still a metal film [27]. The inset of Fig. 3(d) shows the fitting structure with five layers of air/TiO2-n/TiOx-n/SiO2/Si (n = 1, 2 and 3). The raw and fitting curves of Psi-Delta values of TiO2/TiOx-n (n = 1, 2 and 3) films on the SiO2/Si substrate are shown in Figs. 3(d) and 3(f). An obvious absorption is observed in the UV range compared with pure TiOx film, indicating the presence of TiO2 film. The thickness of TiO2 films is around 3 ± 0.2 nm, suggesting a very thin TiO2 insulating film is obtained atop the relatively thick TiOx film. The permittivity of TiO2-1, TiO2-2 and TiO2-3 prepared respectively via in situ oxidization of TiOx-1, TiOx-2 and TiOx-3 is shown in Figs. 3(h) and 3(j). The ε1 of TiO2-3 is a little smaller than rutile TiO2-Palik [40] but much larger than that of TiO2-1 and TiO2-2, while the ε2 of TiO2-3 is very close to rutile TiO2-Palik but much smaller than that of TiO2-1 and TiO2-2 from 850 to 1200 nm. This phenomenon contributes to the strongest dielectric property of TiO2-3 among the obtained three amorphous samples.

2.2 Low-epsilon rectennas simulation

The difference in permittivity of TiOx films leads to the different displacement current. Displacement field D=εrε0E, where ε0 is the permittivity of free space, εr is the relative permittivity with εr=ε1+jε2, where ε2 is the imaginary part of the permittivity. A noble metal seldom behaves as a perfect conductor in the optical antenna. Furthermore, displacement current plays a more dominant role than the conduction current and, thus, is the primary one in radio frequency antenna [41].

When electric field E equals to E=E0exp(jωt), the displacement current can be written from Maxwell equation as Eq. (1).

dD/dt=jωD=jωεrε0E=jω(ε1+jε2)ε0E=ωε2ε0Ejωε1ε0E

The imaginary part of displacement current jωε1ε0E means the reciprocal transformation between the electric field and magnetic field. The real part ωε2ε0E exhibits the ability to absorb electromagnetic wave [42]. Since the ε1 of low-epsilon TiOx approaches to 0, the imaginary part jωε1ε0E also approaches to 0. Although the ε2 equals to 0 in an ideal ENZ material, a real low-epsilon material shows non-ignorable loss due to the non-zero ε2 [23,28]. The displacement current coefficient of the obtained TiOx films and Ti-Kirillova with a dimension of S/m are shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). The imaginary part of displacement current coefficient of TiOx-2 and TiOx-3 approaches 0, while the real part is pretty large because of the high ε2, which means strong absorbability [43].

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Displacement current coefficient of (a) TiOx-1, TiOx-2, TiOx-3, and (b) Ti-Kirillova. Return loss spectra of four rectenna models in (c) near-infrared band and (d) middle-infrared band. Model-m (m = 1, 2, 3, and 4) represents simulated structure made of TiOx-n (n = 1, 2 and 3) and Ti-Kirillova, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Return loss of the four rectenna models is simulated by applying external bias voltages on the MIM diode (Figs. 4(c) and 4(d)). TiO x-n/Au antenna coupled with the TiOx-n/TiO2-n/Au diode is denoted as Model-m (m = 1, 2 and 3), and Ti-Kirillova/Au antenna coupled with the Ti-Kirillova/TiO2-3/Au diode is named as Model-4. The return loss peaks in near-infrared band appear at 998 (−10.8 dB), 994 (−11.5 dB), 994 (−11.9 dB) and 940 nm (−10.1 dB) for Model-1, Model-2, Model-3 and Model-4, respectively; while those in the middle-infrared band are at 4284 (−7.8 dB), 4161 (−8.5 dB), 5027 (−8.3 dB) and 5916 nm (−15.7 dB) for Model-1, Model-2, Model-3 and Model-4, respectively. The Model-4 exhibits the highest middle-infrared response due to the notable plasmon resonance of Ti-Kirillova-based antenna. Interestingly, Model-3 has the highest near-infrared response, although the return-loss modulus are almost the same in these four models. This agrees well with the minimum imaginary part of displacement current for TiOx-3 among the films under test in the near-infrared band. The plasmon resonance can be very weak when the imaginary part of displacement current is close to zero.

2.3 Low-epsilon rectenna photodetectors

The rectenna patterns were defined with a bilayer resist using electron beam lithography (Vistec EBPG 5000plus ES, USA), followed by film deposition (TiOx and Cr/Au) and lift-off process. First, the primer resist (Rohm & Haas, LOL2000, USA) was spin-coated on the substrate, followed by positive resist (ZEON Corporation, ZEP520A, Japan). Three layers of TiOx antenna bow, TiO2 insulator box, and Cr/Au antenna bow were fabricated sequentially using the localizer for alignment by repeating thrice of the above process. TiO2 films were prepared via in situ oxidization of the three different TiOx lead wires using oxygen plasma. Finally, rectenna was fabricated using the obtained TiOx-n/Au antenna coupled with the TiOx-n/TiO 2-n/Au diode, denoted as Device-n (n = 1, 2 and 3). In the experimental setup, the cascaded grating acts as a wavelength filter after a tungsten strip lamp. Two groups of off-axis paraboloidal mirrors are used as beam adjustment system to focus the partially polarized monochromatic light on photodetector. The photocurrent signal is detected with a lock-in amplifier (SR830, Stanford) by setting the chopping frequency of 2 kHz. The responsivity of Device-3 is calibrated by a standard pyroelectric detector (DPe22, Zolix). It is found that the experimental photocurrent responsivity of Device-3 in the near-infrared band is about 13.6 nA/W at around 900 nm (Fig. 5(a)), which is close to the simulated near-infrared resonance wavelength. All of the four models contribute almost the same return-loss modulus in near-infrared range. Although Model-4 presents a better fit with the spectral location of the maximum photoresponse compared with Model-3, the Model-4 has a major response in the mid-infrared range, and its return-loss peak in the near-infrared has a high order oscillation and a weak absorption. Considering the effectiveness of spectroscopic ellipsometry fitting, moreover, Device-3 agrees well with Model-3 in the near-infrared band. The polarization dependence for Device-3 excited by the partially polarized light at 900 nm is shown in Fig. 5(b). Device-3 has a higher photoresponsivity when it is placed at 0° and 180°, implying the antenna response. However, there are no detectable photocurrent for the Device-1 and Device-2, possibly because of their bad rectifying property [29].

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 (a) Photocurrent responsivity spectrum of Device-3, inset is SEM image of a typical rectenna. (b) Polarization depencence for Device-3 excited by the partially polarized light at 900 nm. (c) The semilog plot of current modulus from I-V curve, inset is the schematic energy band structure of an MIM tunneling diode. (d) Efficiency of different devices. Device-n (n = 1, 2 and 3) represents the TiOx-n/Au antenna coupled with TiOx-n/TiO2-n/Au diode.

Download Full Size | PDF

Band diagram of the obtained MIM diode is shown in the inset of Fig. 5(c). For the unbiased structure, a built-in electric field is present due to the difference in the work function of Au and TiOx, which is also closely related to the thickness of TiO2 insulating layer (here, actually the width of tunneling barrier). Given Au is grounded, the barrier decreases when the potential applied on TiOx increases, and the tunneling current increases quickly. The rectifying characteristics of the obtained devices is manifested by the semilog plot of current modulus (Fig. 5(c)) from the I-V curve measured by Keithley Sourse Meter (2636B). Device-3 possesses the maximum rectifying ratio of 11 at ± 1 V bias, while it is 1.1 for both Device-1 and Device-2. Obviously, Device-3 has the best rectifying property among them, as the ε1 of TiOx-3 is negative, which can promote the rectifying property of an MIM diode [27]. This also agrees well with the fact that TiO2-3 exhibits the best dielectric property. Moreover, Fig. 5(d) shows the beta non-linear coefficient as calculated by Eq. (2) [33].

β=0.5×(d2I/d2V)/(dI/dV)

It is found that the β of Device-3 is about 1.3 A/W without bias (Fig. 5(d)), which is large enough to contribute a good rectification compared with the reported value of around 0.5 A/W [34]. On the contrary, it is about 0.07 A/W for both the Device-1 and Device-2, which is almost an order of magnitude lower than the reported value. This may explain why the Device-1 and Device-2 have no detectable photocurrent. As for its essence, TiOx-3 has the lowest imaginary displacement current, and TiO2-3 has the strongest permittivity. This makes Device-3 have the highest antenna impedance and the best tunneling diode rectification among these three samples.

3. Conclusion

In conclusion, the fabrication recipe has a significant impact on the TiOx-based rectenna. Low-epsilon TiOx film is successfully prepared by optimizing the film deposition parameters, which exhibits a negative permittivity and considerable metallic property. TiO2 prepared via in situ oxidization of the TiOx shows strong dielectric property. Coupled with 3.7 μm length of TiOx/Au antenna, the MIM diode can be used to achieve photoelectric response at around 900 nm. Moreover, the performance of accurately prepared devices can be enhanced using the protocol proposed in this work, which may offer a new approach for the infrared photodetector meeting the requirements of practical applications.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z151100003315022); the Belt and Road Initiative by Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Acknowledgments

In memoriam of the help of RBS analysis from Analytical Instrumentation Center, Peking University.

References

1. W. C. Brown, Electronic, and mechanical improvement of the receiving terminal of a free-space microwave power transmission system (NASA CR-135194, Raytheon Company, 08, 1977).

2. J. O. McSpadden and J. C. Mankins, “Space solar power programs and microwave wireless power transmission technology,” IEEE Microw. Mag. 3(4), 46–57 (2002). [CrossRef]  

3. Y. Fujino, N. Kaya, and T. Saka, “Development of A C band rectenna for microwave power transmission toward a space robot,” Acta Astronaut. 50(5), 295–300 (2002). [CrossRef]  

4. Y. J. Ren, M. Y. Li, and K. Chang, “35 GHz rectifying antenna for wireless power transmission,” Electron. Lett. 43(11), 602 (2007). [CrossRef]  

5. K. Huang and V. K. N. Lau, “Enabling wireless power transfer in cellular networks: architecture, modeling and deployment,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 13(2), 902–912 (2014). [CrossRef]  

6. C. Fumeaux, W. Herrmann, F. K. Kneubühl, and H. Rothuizen, “Nanometer thin-film Ni-NiO-Ni diodes for detection, and mixing of 30 THz radiation,” Infrared Phys. Technol. 39(3), 123–183 (1998). [CrossRef]  

7. P. Bharadwaj, B. Deutsch, and L. Novotny, “Optical antennas,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 1(3), 438 (2009). [CrossRef]  

8. G. Moddel and S. Grover, Rectenna solar cells (Springer, 2013).

9. S. Grover and G. Moddel, “Applicability of metal/insulator/metal (MIM) diodes to solar rectennas,” IEEE J. Photovolt. 1(1), 78–83 (2011). [CrossRef]  

10. E. Briones, J. Alda, and F. J. González, “Conversion efficiency of broad-band rectennas for solar energy harvesting applications,” Opt. Express 21(S3Suppl 3), A412–A418 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. E. Briones, J. Briones, A. Cuadrado, S. McMurtry, M. Hehn, F. Montaigne, J. Alda, and F. J. Gonzalez, Computational analysis of a spiral thermoelectric nanoantenna for solar energy harvesting applications (The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, 2014).

12. G. P. Szakmany, A. O. Orlov, G. H. Bernstein, and W. Porod, “Polarization-dependent response of single- and bi-metal antenna-coupled thermopiles for infrared detection,” IEEE T. THz Sci. Techn. 5(6), 884–891 (2015).

13. N. Engheta, A. Salandrino, and A. Alù, “Circuit elements at optical frequencies: nanoinductors, nanocapacitors, and nanoresistors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(9), 095504 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. L. Novotny, “Effective wavelength scaling for optical antennas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(26), 266802 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Tuning the scattering response of optical nanoantennas with nanocircuit loads,” Nat. Photonics 2(5), 307–310 (2008). [CrossRef]  

16. A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Input impedance, nanocircuit loading, and radiation tuning of optical nanoantennas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(4), 043901 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. F. J. González, J. Alda, J. Simón, J. Ginn, and G. Boreman, “The effect of metal dispersion on the resonance of antennas at infrared frequencies,” Infrared Phys. Technol. 52(1), 48–51 (2009). [CrossRef]  

18. P. Biagioni, J. S. Huang, and B. Hecht, “Nanoantennas for visible and infrared radiation,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 75(2), 024402 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. S. Choi, Efficient antennas for terahertz and optical frequencies (University of Michigan, 129, 2014).

20. S. K. Patel and C. Argyropoulos, “Plasmonic nanoantennas: enhancing light-matter interactions at the nanoscale,” EPJ Appl. Metamat. 2, 4 (2015). [CrossRef]  

21. N. Liu, F. Wen, Y. Zhao, Y. Wang, P. Nordlander, N. J. Halas, and A. Alù, “Individual nanoantennas loaded with three-dimensional optical nanocircuits,” Nano Lett. 13(1), 142–147 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. L. Braic, N. Vasilantonakis, A. Mihai, I. J. Villar Garcia, S. Fearn, B. Zou, N. M. Alford, B. Doiron, R. F. Oulton, S. A. Maier, A. V. Zayats, and P. K. Petrov, “Titanium oxynitride thin films with tunable double epsilon-near-zero behavior for nanophotonic applications,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(35), 29857–29862 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. D. Piccinotti, B. Gholipour, J. Yao, K. F. MacDonald, B. E. Hayden, and N. I. Zheludev, “Optical response of nanohole arrays filled with chalcogenide low-epsilon media,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(22), 1800395 (2018). [CrossRef]  

24. N. Engheta, “Materials science. Pursuing near-zero response,” Science 340(6130), 286–287 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. L. La Spada, Epsilon-near-zero nanoantennas (9th International Conference on Body Area Networks, 09, 2014).

26. I. Liberal and N. Engheta, “Manipulating thermal emission with spatially static fluctuating fields in arbitrarily shaped epsilon-near-zero bodies,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115(12), 2878–2883 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. M. Popović, M. Novaković, E. Schmidt, P. Schöppe, N. Bibić, C. Ronning, and Z. Rakočević, “Low-loss and tunable near-zero-epsilon titanium nitride,” Opt. Mater. 72, 775–780 (2017). [CrossRef]  

28. M. H. Javani and M. I. Stockman, “Real and imaginary properties of epsilon-near-zero materials,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(10), 107404 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. S. Grover, O. Dmitriyeva, M. J. Estes, and G. Moddel, “Traveling-wave metal/insulator/metal diodes for improved infrared bandwidth and efficiency of antenna-coupled rectifiers,” IEEE Trans. NanoTechnol. 9(6), 716–722 (2010). [CrossRef]  

30. J. A. Bean, A. Weeks, and G. D. Boreman, “Performance optimization of antenna-coupled Al/AlOx/Pt tunnel diode infrared detectors,” IEEE Trans. NanoTechnol. 47(1), 126–135 (2011).

31. N. Alimardani and J. F. Conley Jr., “Step tunneling enhanced asymmetry in asymmetric electrode metal-insulator-insulator-metal tunnel diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(14), 143501 (2013). [CrossRef]  

32. A. Sharma, V. Singh, T. L. Bougher, and B. A. Cola, “A carbon nanotube optical rectenna,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(12), 1027–1032 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

33. P. S. Davids, R. L. Jarecki, A. Starbuck, D. B. Burckel, E. A. Kadlec, T. Ribaudo, E. A. Shaner, and D. W. Peters, “Infrared rectification in a nanoantenna-coupled metal-oxide-semiconductor tunnel diode,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(12), 1033–1038 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

34. A. Belkadi, A. Weerakkody, and G. Moddel, “Large errors from assuming equivalent DC and high-frequency electrical characteristics in metal-multiple-insulator-metal diodes,” ACS Photonics 5(12), 4776–4780 (2018). [CrossRef]  

35. M. BareiB, P. M. Krenz, G. P. Szakmany, B. N. Tiwari, D. Kalblein, A. O. Orlov, G. H. Bernstein, G. Scarpa, B. Fabel, U. Zschieschang, H. Klauk, W. Porod, and P. Lugli, “Rectennas revisited,” IEEE Trans. NanoTechnol. 12(6), 1144–1150 (2013).

36. K. Wang, H. Hu, S. Lu, L. Guo, T. Zhang, Y. Han, A. Zhou, and T. He, “Design and analysis of a square spiral nano-rectenna for infrared energy harvest and conversion,” Opt. Mater. Express 6(12), 3977–3991 (2016). [CrossRef]  

37. K. Wang, H. Hu, S. Lu, L. Guo, and T. He, “Design of a sector bowtie nano-rectenna for optical power and infrared detection,” Front. Phys. 10(5), 104101 (2015). [CrossRef]  

38. A. D. Rakić, A. B. Djurišić, J. M. Elazar, and M. L. Majewski, “Optical properties of metallic films for vertical-cavity optoelectronic devices,” Appl. Opt. 37(22), 5271–5283 (1998). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

39. M. A. Ordal, R. J. Bell, R. W. Alexander Jr., L. A. Newquist, and M. R. Querry, “Optical properties of Al, Fe, Ti, Ta, W, and Mo at submillimeter wavelengths,” Appl. Opt. 27(6), 1203–1209 (1988). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

40. E. D. Palik, Handbook of optical constants of solids (Academic Press, 1985).

41. Y. Li, Plasmonic optics: theory and applications (SPIE, 2017).

42. B. Edwards and N. Engheta, “Experimental verification of displacement-current conduits in metamaterials-inspired optical circuitry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(19), 193902 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

43. F. Ding, J. Dai, Y. Chen, J. Zhu, Y. Jin, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Broadband near-infrared metamaterial absorbers utilizing highly lossy metals,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 39445 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Diagram of (a) rectenna and (b) MIM tunneling diode.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 SEM cross-section images of (a) TiOx-1, (b) TiOx-2, (c) TiOx-3 and (d) Au films. (e) XRD parrterns of TiOx compared with standard Si, Ti, rutile TiO2 and anatase TiO2 from MDI Jade 6.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 RBS spectra of (a) TiOx films and (b) TiO2/TiOx films on silica. (c) Raw and fitting Psi curves of TiOx films. (d) Raw and fitting Psi curves of TiO2/TiOx films. (e) Raw and fitting Delta curves of TiOx films. (f) Raw and fitting Delta curves of TiO2/TiOx films. (g) Real and (i) Imaginary part of permittivity of TiOx-1, TiOx-2, TiOx-3 and Ti-Kirillova. (h) Real and (j) Imaginary part of permittivity of TiO2-1, TiO2-2, TiO2-3 and rutile TiO2-Palik. Insets of (I) in (a), (I) in (b), (c) and (d) are the corresponding fitting structure. Insets of (II) in (a) and (b) are the zoom-in RBS spectra.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Displacement current coefficient of (a) TiOx-1, TiOx-2, TiOx-3, and (b) Ti-Kirillova. Return loss spectra of four rectenna models in (c) near-infrared band and (d) middle-infrared band. Model-m (m = 1, 2, 3, and 4) represents simulated structure made of TiOx-n (n = 1, 2 and 3) and Ti-Kirillova, respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 (a) Photocurrent responsivity spectrum of Device-3, inset is SEM image of a typical rectenna. (b) Polarization depencence for Device-3 excited by the partially polarized light at 900 nm. (c) The semilog plot of current modulus from I-V curve, inset is the schematic energy band structure of an MIM tunneling diode. (d) Efficiency of different devices. Device-n (n = 1, 2 and 3) represents the TiOx-n/Au antenna coupled with TiOx-n/TiO2-n/Au diode.

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

dD/dt=jωD=jω ε r ε 0 E=jω( ε 1 +j ε 2 ) ε 0 E=ω ε 2 ε 0 Ejω ε 1 ε 0 E
β=0.5×( d 2 I/ d 2 V)/(dI/dV)
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.