Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Broadband continuous/discrete spectrum optical absorber using graphene-wrapped fractal oligomers

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this paper, a second-order fractal oligomer constructed by graphene-coated cylindrical nano-rods is proposed as the unit cell of a wideband optical absorber. Nano-rods have resided on a dielectric substrate with a thick metallic mirror. The fractional bandwidth of the designed structure is 88.67% for the absorption above 90%. Broadband absorption originates from the cooperative excitation of localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPRs) of the bottom, top, and lateral surfaces of the rods, engineered by the geometrical parameters through the fractal concept. Designed full absorber has an acceptable performance concerning the incident angles up to around 35° and it is polarization insensitive. Moreover, broadband absorption can be altered to multi-band performance in the same spectrum with the desired number of frequency bands. This feature is obtained by manipulating the substrate thickness to excite multiple orders of Fabry-Perot cavity resonances. Our proposed structure has potential applications in various optical devices such as filters, sensors, and modulators.

© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Absorbers at optical frequencies are of great interest in various applications including photovoltaics and thermophotovoltaics, photodetectors, color filters, and thermal light sources [1]. Enhanced narrow-band absorption is attainable by exploiting various types of configurations, including Salisbury screens, Fabry–Pérot cavities, guided resonances in the photonic crystals, and localized surface plasmon resonances in the metallic nanoparticles [2]. For some specific applications such as sensing, switching, and imaging, multiband, or broadband performance is required [3,4]. Circuit analog absorber (CAA), metamaterial absorber (MA), and frequency selective surface (FSS) absorbers are three main categories of broadband absorbers [5].

Resonant-based absorbers suffer from limited bandwidth of 10-30% [6]. One way of enhancing the bandwidth of the resonant structures is by combining several closely packed narrowband resonance frequencies [7]. This purpose can be achieved in various ways, including super-unit coplanar structures, a single structure with multiple resonating sections, and stacking metal-insulators [8]. In this regard, four all-dielectric cylinders with different radii are considered in the unit cell of a terahertz microstructure reflector [9]. Moreover, fractal cubic nanowires are proposed at the visible spectrum [10]. Specifically considering the graphene-based structures, 2D circular disks with various radii are considered in the design of a wideband invisible cloak [11]. Furthermore, CVD-grown single-crystal graphene Sierpinski carpet fractals are used to experimentally realize a broadband photodetector [12]. In another design, multiple graphene ribbons are stacked on an optically thick golden substrate [13].

In this research, graphene-covered fractal cylindrical nanoparticles are used as the unit cells of a broadband optical absorber. Previously, we had proposed a tunable optical absorber and a single negative (SNG) metamaterial reflector using assemblies of graphene-coated spherical nanoparticles [14,15] and now we are extending the research to cylindrical particles due to the geometrical flexibility via the length of the cylinders. The degree of freedom provided by the lengths of the cylinders is successfully used in the bandwidth enhancement using the fractal concept.

Another exotic property of the graphene-coated cylinders is the excitation of localized surface plasmons in their top, bottom, and lateral surfaces with different frequencies [16]. An innovative approach for obtaining a multispectral absorption response is to use different resonance modes in a single structure [17]. For instance, in an all-metal plasmonic perfect absorber, excitation of guided modes with different orders is responsible for the dual-band absorption [18]. Moreover, in another broadband structure, fundamental and second-order surface plasmons of graphene-based complementary metasurface are effectively excited at two resonance frequencies [19]. Interestingly, we have attained broadband performance by exciting multiple resonances of various orders in different sections of the unit cell.

To further improve the performance, the fractal geometry is re-arranged as an oligomer. Clusters of nanoparticles can provide much more degrees of freedom in manipulating the optical response [20]. Toroidal dipole resonances, magnetic Fano resonances (FRs) illustrated as hot and cold spots in the nano-gaps, and induced charge transfer plasmons (CTPs) are a few applications of such molecules [2123]. These assemblies have a great potential to enhance the light trapping of organic solar cells [24,25] and now we will extend their application to the infrared spectrum by using the plasmonic mode engineering in graphene. Importantly, experimental realizations of nanoparticle clusters show a good agreement with the simulation results [26]. It is worth noting that with the current fabrication technology, it is feasible to experimentally realize graphene-coated cylinders with the diameters around tens of nanometers [27,28].

The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, the unit cell of our proposed broadband absorber is introduced. The underlying mechanism of the performance is discussed based on impedance matching technique and the excitation of multiple first and second-order plasmonic resonances. Moreover, the substrate height is introduced as a means for exciting the desired number of Fabry-Perot cavity resonances with high absorption. Later, various aspects of the practical realization of the absorber are clarified. Finally, the concluding remarks are mentioned in section 3.

2. Results and discussions

The structure under analysis is a periodic arrangement of graphene-coated hollow cylinders. In this structure, the fractal nano-cylinders are assembled as an oligomer and an optical reflecting cavity is used as the substrate. The side and top views of the unit cell are illustrated in Fig. 1 and it is assumed that a plane wave with the wavenumber k normally illuminates the structure. The numerical simulations are carried out with the frequency domain solver of CST commercial software package. This solver performs based on the finite integrating technique (FIT). Moreover, unit cell boundary conditions are applied in x-y directions to account for the infinite planar array and Floquet ports are considered along the open z-directions. The absorption (A) of the structure is calculated using the simulated reflectance (R) and transmittance (T) as $A = 1 - T - R$ [7], where $T = {|{{S_{21}}} |^2}$ and $R = {|{{S_{11}}} |^2}$. The scattering parameters S11 and S21 respectively are the simulated reflection and transmission coefficients. Since the particles have resided on top of a metal-backed dielectric layer, the transmitted waves are fully blocked.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. The unit cell of the proposed broadband absorber constructed by graphene-coated fractal nano-cylinder oligomer. (a) Side-view of the particles, (b) side view of the substrate, and (c) top-view of the unit cell. The wavenumber of the incident wave is denoted by k.

Download Full Size | PDF

2.1 Broadband continuous/discrete spectrum absorption enhancement

To obtain a wide absorption spectrum, the geometrical and optical parameters of our proposed structure in Fig. 1 are optimized. The geometrical parameters are r1=90 nm, h1=1200 nm, r2=36 nm, h2=400 nm, hs=1.2 μm, g = 20 nm, and p = 312 nm. Graphene cover is considered as a thin sheet with the temperature T = 300 °K, relaxation time τ = 3.29e − 2 ps, and chemical potential μc=0.6 eV. The relative permittivity of the substrate is considered ε=2. Also, as another factor for broadband absorption enhancement, the distance of adjacent unit cells are reduced to 0.2 g for stronger coupling. The absorption, reflection, and transmission spectrum of the optimized structure are shown in Fig. 2.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. The absorption, reflection and transmission spectrum of the proposed broadband absorber shown in Fig. 1. The optimized geometrical and optical parameters are r1=90 nm, h1=1200 nm, r2=36 nm, h2=400 nm, hs=1.2 µm, g = 20 nm, p = 312 nm, T = 300 °K, τ = 3.29e − 2 ps, and μc=0.6 eV.

Download Full Size | PDF

The fractional bandwidth of 88.67% (21.11-54.74 THz) for the absorption above 90% is obtained by our proposed structure. In comparison to the broadband tunable metamaterial graphene absorber with − 10 dB bandwidth spanning from 22.02 to 36.61 THz on the same substrate [29], our proposed structure has a wider bandwidth. The ultra-thin electrical length of the former is 0.09λ at the lowest frequency while the latter is 0.169λ at the lowest frequency by neglecting the reflecting ground [29]. From the result of Fig. 2, it is inferred that the absorber has as a fourth-order band-pass response with the plasmonic resonance frequencies of f1=22.83 THz, f2=29.80 THz, f3=40.00 THz, and f4=50.05 THz. To provide further insight into the mechanism of the absorption, the real and imaginary parts of the retrieved surface impedance Z are illustrated in Fig. 3(a). The normalized surface impedance is extracted via [30,31]

$$Z ={\pm} \sqrt {\frac{{{{({1 + {S_{11}}} )}^2} - S_{21}^2}}{{{{({1 - {S_{11}}} )}^2} - S_{21}^2}}} ={\pm} \frac{{1 + {S_{11}}}}{{1 - {S_{11}}}}$$
Clearly, in the desired bandwidth, the real part of the surface impedance is around the normalized impedance of the free-space and the imaginary part oscillates around the zero. Moreover, the phase of reflection coefficient S11 is illustrated in Fig. 3(b). The reflection phase shows a 360° transition at each resonance. This is the necessary resonance condition of the Salisbury screen and leads to the absorption peak via impedance matching [32].

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a) The real $(\Re )$ and imaginary $(\Im )$ parts of the retrieved surface impedance and (b) the phase of S11 parameter in the absorption band to illustrate the impedance matching with the free-space impedance.

Download Full Size | PDF

The absorption spectrums of the two sub-structures of the fractal geometry contributing to the bandwidth enhancement are shown in Fig. 4. As expected, the long center cylinder contributes to the low-frequency performance while the oligomer constructed by the short cylinders provides a high-frequency absorption. The mutual interaction of these two structures results in broadband performance, as discussed before.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. The absorption spectrums for the two sub-structures of the fractal geometry contributing to the bandwidth enhancement of the proposed absorber in Fig. 1. The blue curve represents the contribution of the center rod with the optimized geometrical and optical parameters as in Fig. 2. The red curve shows the same information for the oligomer in which the center cylinder has an identical size with the surrounding ones.

Download Full Size | PDF

Due to the large height difference in the elements of the unit cell, it is expected that the structure performs differently for various incident angles. As Fig. 5 shows, the broadband absorption maintains up to the oblique incidence of around 35°. Moreover, due to fourfold symmetry, the performance is polarization insensitive. Interestingly, for the grazing angle of 90°, the operational mode of the structure is switched to the dual-band reflector with an efficiency of 80%.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Absorptivity of structure in Fig. 1 for different incident angles of the illuminating wave. The optical and geometrical parameters are the same as Fig. 1.

Download Full Size | PDF

As a final comment, by considering the designed unit cell on top of the thicker substrates, depending on the height of the substrate, multiple orders of Fabry-Perot cavity resonances are excited and enhanced considerably. The realization of double, triple, and quadruple absorption bands by engineering the substrate height is illustrated in Fig. 6.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Realization of the multi-band absorber by engineering the substrate height. The substrate heights hs=8.4, 10.8, and 13.2 µm respectively result in the double, triple, and quadruple absorption bands.

Download Full Size | PDF

2.2 Revealing the underlying mechanism through surface plasmon engineering

In order to reveal the underlying absorption mechanism through surface plasmon engineering, each finite length graphene-wrapped cylinder can be considered as the combination of two circular disks and one cylindrical shell. Using full electrodynamics calculations, it can be proved that dipolar plasmon resonance of a 2D graphene disk leads to strong near-field enhancement [33]. Plasmonic resonances originate from charge accumulation and can trap the electromagnetic waves, to be dissipated in the ohmic losses of graphene [34]. In the disk assemblies, dipolar hybridization can excite the higher-order modes which are not excitable with a single disk [35]. Similarly, in an infinite graphene-coated cylinder, optical absorption resulting from the plasmonic resonances can be manipulated by the cylinder radius [36]. The necessary condition for plasmonic excitation in graphene wires is the induction of electric currents in the azimuthal direction [37]. For each mode order $m \ne 0$, 2 m nodes could be observed in the electric field, along the cross-section of the wire [38]. In the infinite length graphene-coated cylinders, there is no variation of the electric field along the length of the cylinder. By considering finite-length graphene-based rods, the standing waves are also formed. In the following paragraphs, the above-mentioned resonances will be illustrated. It is interesting to note that although absorber design using metallic nanoparticles is a well-known technique [39], the superiority of our proposed structure is using 2D graphene material which leads to plasmonic resonances of various orders in the different sections of a single structure.

The x, y, and z components of the electric fields in four absorption resonances in Fig. 2 are illustrated in Fig. 7. As the figure shows, the bandwidth is enhanced by exciting the localized surface plasmons of multiple orders in different sections [40,41]. The excitations of localized surface plasmons are inferred via the charge oscillations which are exhibited by the change in the sign of the induced electric fields. The red color shows the positive values and the blue color represents the negative values. In this figure, the second-order plasmons are excited in the center cylinders of Figs. 7(a), (g), and (j). In these figures, the plasmons are also modulated in the longitude direction, which is occurred due to the finite length of the cylinder. In contrast, in the center cylinders of Figs. 7(d)-(e), there are not variations of the electric fields along the lengths of the cylinders which resemble an infinite length cylinder. In the subfigures (c), (f), (i), and (l) the dipolar localized surface plasmon resonances of the top (bottom) disks of the center cylinders are excited. Moreover, in Figs. 7(d), (g), and (j), the quadruple plasmons of the top and bottom disks are excited. The same interpretations can be used for the surrounding cylinders. Localized surface plasmons in all surrounding cylinders are not excited simultaneously and each one contributes diffidently in the bandwidth enhancement. Note that these figures are associated with the first excited mode. By investigating the second mode, these interpretations will correspond to y-directed electric fields.

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. The electric field distributions of various absorption peaks fN for N = 1 − 4, in x, y, and z directions to illustrate the contribution of LSPRs of different parts in the broadband absorption.

Download Full Size | PDF

From the experimental point of view, in our proposed structure, cylindrical particles with various heights, side dimensions, and aspect ratios are exploited, which are realizable due to the current fabrication technologies [10,42]. For instance, the particles can be thinned down to the desired height with a defocused ion beam [43]. Moreover, graphene can be wrapped around particles with various shapes and sizes due to the van der Waals force [44]. The nano-gaps can be tuned with sacrificial poly-Si filling, which is then removed with highly selective poly-Si wet etchant [45].

To bias the graphene-based periodic structures with the electrostatic biasing scheme, it is essential to electrically connect the elements. In this regard, cross-like elements linked through graphene strips have been proposed [46]. Moreover, complementary structures are used as easier alternatives [47]. The single-gate biasing scheme by employing connecting strips can be exploited for the 3D structures [48]. To prevent the complexities arising from the biasing network, chemical doping is the best biasing technique for our proposed structure. This method does not pose any limitation in the practicability of the structure. On the other hand, since the real and imaginary parts of the graphene surface impedance Zs, shown in Fig. 8, drastically change with the chemical potential, the absorption rate, and the resonance frequency is not fixed for various chemical potentials. Therefore, the same performance cannot be attained for various chemical potentials. Note that the graphene surface impedance is the inverse of its surface conductivity. The data are extracted from the built-in data of the software.

 figure: Fig. 8.

Fig. 8. (a) The real $(\Re )$ and (b) the imaginary $(\Im )$ parts of the graphene surface impedance for various chemical potentials.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Conclusion

To provide multiple plasmonic resonances in a unit cell of the broadband absorber, the fractal concept is applied to the lengths and radii of an oligomer constructed by graphene-coated nano-cylinders. Each graphene-coated cylinder supports two kinds of multipolar LSPRs excited on the top-bottom disks and cylindrical shells. Using our proposed absorber, the fractional bandwidth of 88.67% for the absorption rate above 90% is obtained at the optical regime. The operation of the absorber is based on the wide-band impedance matching technique which is a well-known absorber design. Finally, the proposed structure can perform in the reflecting and multiband modes respectively by using grazing angle illumination and higher-order Fabry-Perot cavity resonances.

Funding

Iran National Science Foundation (97022894).

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

References

1. A. Monti, A. Alù, A. Toscano, and F. Bilotti, “The Design of Optical Circuit-Analog Absorbers through Electrically Small Nanoparticles,” in Photonics (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2019).

2. Q. Li, J. Lu, P. Gupta, and M. Qiu, “Engineering Optical Absorption in Graphene and Other 2D Materials: Advances and Applications,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(20), 1900595 (2019). [CrossRef]  

3. C. Guo, J. Zhang, W. Xu, K. Liu, X. Yuan, S. Qin, and Z. Zhu, “Graphene-based perfect absorption structures in the visible to terahertz band and their optoelectronics applications,” Nanomaterials 8(12), 1033 (2018). [CrossRef]  

4. L. Ye, F. Zeng, Y. Zhang, and Q. H. Liu, “Composite graphene-metal microstructures for enhanced multiband absorption covering the entire terahertz range,” Carbon 148, 317–325 (2019). [CrossRef]  

5. M. M. Tirkey and N. Gupta, “The quest for perfect electromagnetic absorber: a review,” Int. J. Microw. Wireless Technol. 11(2), 151–167 (2019). [CrossRef]  

6. X. You, A. Upadhyay, Y. Cheng, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, C. Fumeaux, and W. Withayachumnankul, “Ultra-wideband far-infrared absorber based on anisotropically etched doped silicon,” Opt. Lett. 45(5), 1196–1199 (2020). [CrossRef]  

7. B.-X. Wang, L.-L. Wang, G.-Z. Wang, W.-Q. Huang, X.-F. Li, and X. Zhai, “Theoretical investigation of broadband and wide-angle terahertz metamaterial absorber,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 26(2), 111–114 (2014). [CrossRef]  

8. H. Xiong and F. Yang, “Ultra-broadband and tunable saline water-based absorber in microwave regime,” Opt. Express 28(4), 5306–5316 (2020). [CrossRef]  

9. B. Fang, C. Li, Y. Peng, and X. Jing, “Broadband terahertz reflector through electric and magnetic resonances by all dielectric cylinder microstructure,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 61(6), 1634–1639 (2019). [CrossRef]  

10. A. E. Dorche, S. Abdollahramezani, A. Chizari, and A. Khavasi, “Broadband, polarization-insensitive, and wide-angle optical absorber based on fractal plasmonics,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 28(22), 2545–2548 (2016). [CrossRef]  

11. M. Danaeifar and N. Granpayeh, “Wideband invisibility by using inhomogeneous metasurfaces of graphene nanodisks in the infrared regime,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33(8), 1764–1768 (2016). [CrossRef]  

12. F. De Nicola, N. S. Puthiya Purayil, V. Miŝeikis, D. Spirito, A. Tomadin, C. Coletti, M. Polini, R. Krahne, and V. Pellegrini, “Graphene Plasmonic Fractal Metamaterials for Broadband Photodetectors,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 6882 (2020). [CrossRef]  

13. D. Chen, J. Yang, J. Zhang, J. Huang, and Z. Zhang, “Section 1Tunable broadband terahertz absorbers based on multiple layers of graphene ribbons,” Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–8 (2017). [CrossRef]  

14. S. H. Raad and Z. Atlasbaf, “Tunable Optical Absorption Using Graphene Covered Core-Shell Nano-Spheres,” in Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Iranian Conference on, (IEEE, 2018).

15. S. H. Raad and Z. Atlasbaf, “Tunable optical meta-surface using graphene-coated spherical nanoparticles,” AIP Adv. 9(7), 075224 (2019). [CrossRef]  

16. S. H. Raad, Z. Atlasbaf, and C. J. Zapata-Rodríguez, “Multi-frequency near-field enhancement with graphene-coated nano-disk homo-dimers,” Opt. Express 27(25), 37012–37024 (2019). [CrossRef]  

17. Y. Cheng, H. Luo, F. Chen, and R. Gong, “Triple narrow-band plasmonic perfect absorber for refractive index sensing applications of optical frequency,” OSA Continuum 2(7), 2113–2122 (2019). [CrossRef]  

18. Y. Cheng, H. Zhang, X. S. Mao, and R. Gong, “Dual-band plasmonic perfect absorber based on all-metal nanostructure for refractive index sensing application,” Mater. Lett. 219, 123–126 (2018). [CrossRef]  

19. M. L. Huang, Y. Z. Cheng, Z. Z. Cheng, H. R. Chen, X. S. Mao, and R. Z. Gong, “Design of a broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on complementary structural graphene,” Materials 11(4), 540 (2018). [CrossRef]  

20. J. Chai, L. Ge, P. Hu, H. Xiang, and D. Han, “Angle-dependent optical response of the plasmonic nanoparticle clusters with rotational symmetry,” Opt. Express 28(7), 10425–10437 (2020). [CrossRef]  

21. G. Zhang, C. Lan, R. Gao, Y. Wen, and J. Zhou, “Toroidal Dipole Resonances in All-Dielectric Oligomer Metasurfaces,” Adv. Theory Simul. 2(10), 1900123 (2019). [CrossRef]  

22. A. Ahmadivand, R. Sinha, and N. Pala, “Magnetic fano resonances in all-dielectric nanocomplexes under cylindrical vector beams excitation,” Opt. Laser Technol. 90, 65–70 (2017). [CrossRef]  

23. A. Ahmadivand, B. Gerislioglu, and N. Pala, “Azimuthally and radially excited charge transfer plasmon and Fano lineshapes in conductive sublayer-mediated nanoassemblies,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 34(11), 2052–2056 (2017). [CrossRef]  

24. W. Wang, Y. Zhang, M. Chen, Y. Hao, T. Ji, F. Zhu, and Y. Cui, “Efficient light trapping in organic solar cell using a short-pitched hexagonal array of metallic nanocylinders,” IEEE Photonics J. 8(5), 1–9 (2016). [CrossRef]  

25. M. H. Muhammad, M. F. O. Hameed, and S. Obayya, “Absorption enhancement in hexagonal plasmonic solar cell,” in Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (IEEE, 2014).

26. Y. Cui, J. Zhou, V. A. Tamma, and W. Park, “Dynamic tuning and symmetry lowering of Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructure,” ACS Nano 6(3), 2385–2393 (2012). [CrossRef]  

27. Y. Gao and I. V. Shadrivov, “Nonlinear coupling in graphene-coated nanowires,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 38924 (2016). [CrossRef]  

28. M. Farhat, C. Rockstuhl, and H. Bağcı, “A 3D tunable and multi-frequency graphene plasmonic cloak,” Opt. Express 21(10), 12592–12603 (2013). [CrossRef]  

29. H. Xiong, Y.-B. Wu, J. Dong, M.-C. Tang, Y.-N. Jiang, and X.-P. Zeng, “Ultra-thin and broadband tunable metamaterial graphene absorber,” Opt. Express 26(2), 1681–1688 (2018). [CrossRef]  

30. H. Xiong, Q. Ji, T. Bashir, and F. Yang, “Dual-controlled broadband terahertz absorber based on graphene and Dirac semimetal,” Opt. Express 28(9), 13884–13894 (2020). [CrossRef]  

31. S. Lai, Y. Wu, X. Zhu, W. Gu, and W. Wu, “An optically transparent ultrabroadband microwave absorber,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(6), 1–10 (2017). [CrossRef]  

32. T. Li, K. Chen, G. Ding, J. Zhao, T. Jiang, and Y. Feng, “Optically transparent metasurface Salisbury screen with wideband microwave absorption,” Opt. Express 26(26), 34384–34395 (2018). [CrossRef]  

33. S. Thongrattanasiri, F. H. Koppens, and F. J. G. De Abajo, “Complete optical absorption in periodically patterned graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(4), 047401 (2012). [CrossRef]  

34. S. Ke, B. Wang, H. Huang, H. Long, K. Wang, and P. Lu, “Plasmonic absorption enhancement in periodic cross-shaped graphene arrays,” Opt. Express 23(7), 8888–8900 (2015). [CrossRef]  

35. G. Rosolen and B. Maes, “Asymmetric and connected graphene dimers for a tunable plasmonic response,” Phys. Rev. B 92(20), 205405 (2015). [CrossRef]  

36. T.-H. Xiao, L. Gan, and Z.-Y. Li, “Efficient manipulation of graphene absorption by a simple dielectric cylinder,” Opt. Express 23(15), 18975–18987 (2015). [CrossRef]  

37. M. Riso, M. Cuevas, and R. A. Depine, “Tunable plasmonic enhancement of light scattering and absorption in graphene-coated subwavelength wires,” J. Opt. 17(7), 075001 (2015). [CrossRef]  

38. Y. Gao, G. Ren, B. Zhu, H. Liu, Y. Lian, and S. Jian, “Analytical model for plasmon modes in graphene-coated nanowire,” Opt. Express 22(20), 24322–24331 (2014). [CrossRef]  

39. A. Monti, A. Toscano, and F. Bilotti, “Exploiting the surface dispersion of nanoparticles to design optical-resistive sheets and Salisbury absorbers,” Opt. Lett. 41(14), 3383–3386 (2016). [CrossRef]  

40. F. Chen, Y. Cheng, and H. Luo, “A broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on single-layer complementary gammadion-shaped graphene,” Materials 13(4), 860 (2020). [CrossRef]  

41. M. Huang, Y. Cheng, Z. Cheng, H. Chen, X. Mao, and R. Gong, “Based on graphene tunable dual-band terahertz metamaterial absorber with wide-angle,” Opt. Commun. 415, 194–201 (2018). [CrossRef]  

42. T. Ozel, B. A. Zhang, R. Gao, R. W. Day, C. M. Lieber, and D. G. Nocera, “Electrochemical deposition of conformal and functional layers on high aspect ratio silicon micro/nanowires,” Nano Lett. 17(7), 4502–4507 (2017). [CrossRef]  

43. A. Dhawan, J. Muth, D. Leonard, M. Gerhold, J. Gleeson, T. Vo-Dinh, and P. Russell, “Focused ion beam fabrication of metallic nanostructures on end faces of optical fibers for chemical sensing applications,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct.--Process., Meas., Phenom. 26(6), 2168–2173 (2008). [CrossRef]  

44. M. Cuevas, M. A. Riso, and R. A. Depine, “Complex frequencies and field distributions of localized surface plasmon modes in graphene-coated subwavelength wires,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 173, 26–33 (2016). [CrossRef]  

45. B. Zhu, G. Ren, Y. Yang, Y. Gao, B. Wu, Y. Lian, J. Wang, and S. Jian, “Field enhancement and gradient force in the graphene-coated nanowire pairs,” Plasmonics 10(4), 839–845 (2015). [CrossRef]  

46. A. Fardoost, F. G. Vanani, and R. Safian, “Design of a multilayer graphene-based ultrawideband terahertz absorber,” IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 16(1), 68–74 (2016). [CrossRef]  

47. J. Ding, B. Arigong, H. Ren, M. Zhou, J. Shao, M. Lu, Y. Chai, Y. Lin, and H. Zhang, “Tuneable complementary metamaterial structures based on graphene for single and multiple transparency windows,” Sci. Rep. 4(1), 6128 (2015). [CrossRef]  

48. A. Forouzmand, M. M. Salary, S. Inampudi, and H. Mosallaei, “A Tunable Multigate Indium-Tin-Oxide-Assisted All-Dielectric Metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(7), 1701275 (2018). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. The unit cell of the proposed broadband absorber constructed by graphene-coated fractal nano-cylinder oligomer. (a) Side-view of the particles, (b) side view of the substrate, and (c) top-view of the unit cell. The wavenumber of the incident wave is denoted by k.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The absorption, reflection and transmission spectrum of the proposed broadband absorber shown in Fig. 1. The optimized geometrical and optical parameters are r1=90 nm, h1=1200 nm, r2=36 nm, h2=400 nm, hs=1.2 µm, g = 20 nm, p = 312 nm, T = 300 °K, τ = 3.29e − 2 ps, and μc=0.6 eV.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) The real $(\Re )$ and imaginary $(\Im )$ parts of the retrieved surface impedance and (b) the phase of S11 parameter in the absorption band to illustrate the impedance matching with the free-space impedance.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The absorption spectrums for the two sub-structures of the fractal geometry contributing to the bandwidth enhancement of the proposed absorber in Fig. 1. The blue curve represents the contribution of the center rod with the optimized geometrical and optical parameters as in Fig. 2. The red curve shows the same information for the oligomer in which the center cylinder has an identical size with the surrounding ones.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Absorptivity of structure in Fig. 1 for different incident angles of the illuminating wave. The optical and geometrical parameters are the same as Fig. 1.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Realization of the multi-band absorber by engineering the substrate height. The substrate heights hs=8.4, 10.8, and 13.2 µm respectively result in the double, triple, and quadruple absorption bands.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. The electric field distributions of various absorption peaks fN for N = 1 − 4, in x, y, and z directions to illustrate the contribution of LSPRs of different parts in the broadband absorption.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. (a) The real $(\Re )$ and (b) the imaginary $(\Im )$ parts of the graphene surface impedance for various chemical potentials.

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

Z = ± ( 1 + S 11 ) 2 S 21 2 ( 1 S 11 ) 2 S 21 2 = ± 1 + S 11 1 S 11
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.