Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Dynamic terahertz transmission based on coupling reconfiguration of spoof surface plasmon polaritons

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a dynamic transmission structure based on the coupling reconfiguration of spoof surface plasmon polaritons (SSPPs) in a 2D coplanar grating. By embedding a VO2 film into the signal line, the dynamic transmission is realized by reconfiguring the coupling of terahertz waves from quasi-TEM waves to SSPPs. The analysis shows that the transmission can be modulated in almost the entire band of the SSPPs, which further benefits a promising group delay due to the weak dispersion characteristic in the frequency region much lower than the cut-off frequency of SSPPs. In addition, for the dynamic modulation caused by the coupling reconfiguration, only rather a small area of VO2 film is needed to break the robustness of the 2D coplanar grating. Therefore, the coupling reconfiguration mechanism proposed in this paper facilitates the realization of an easily on-chip integrated dynamic SSPPs transmission structure with ultra-large bandwidth, and low group delay time difference. Accordingly, the presented mechanism will play a positive role in promoting the development of terahertz dynamic devices.

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Dynamic devices are widely used in terahertz systems [15]. According to the feeding forms of terahertz waves, the devices can be generally divided into two types. The first is the quasi-optics device, such as various meta-surfaces, in which the terahertz propagates in the free space and is modulated by resonances, Berry phase, and so on [610]. The second is the on-chip device, in which the terahertz propagates on the chip, and is modulated by the mechanisms of impendence matching, on-chip resonance, and so on [1114].

In order to realize an easy system integration, more compact dynamic device, Spoof Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SSPPs) becomes a potential breakthrough point. SSPPs are electromagnetic slow waves that exist on the surface of periodic structures [1518]. Due to its high localization and transmission robustness, it has great potential in wide applications of on-chip transmission line decoupling, parasitic parameter suppression, and chip miniaturization [1923]. More importantly, the transmission characteristics of SSPPs are strongly dependent on the periodic structure design, which makes the dispersion reconfiguration by structure reconstructing to be a new degree for on-chip electromagnetic wave modulation [24,25]. Especially in the terahertz band, dispersion reconfiguration becomes a powerful means of breaking through the difficult problem of weak terahertz-matter interaction to achieve efficient terahertz modulation and has demonstrated great potential for amplitude modulation and high-precision shifting [2629].

The typical routing of dispersion reconfiguration is to embed a phase transmission material into the periodic cell in a 2D grating, which adjusts the cut-off frequency of SSPPs to realize the amplitude modulation [3034]. It is reported that modulation with more than 12 dB modulation depth and a minimum insertion loss of 5.5 dB in the frequency region from 0.22 to 0.28 THz is presented by adjusting the SSPPs with different duty cycles [35]. In 2020, Tiejun Cui's team investigated an integrated multi-mode digital modulator based on SSPPs. By introducing PIN diodes in SSPPs, reconfigurable cells are constructed to realize different modulation schemes such as ASK and FSK [36]. In addition, taking advantage of the high localization of SSPPs, Y. Liang et al. recently achieved a high-speed terahertz OOK modulation up to 13.5 Gbps by using SSPPs metal waveguides combined with SRR [37].

Nowadays, the developing terahertz communication demands higher data capacity, higher transmission rate, and higher integration, which poses new challenges for SSPPs-based modulation in terms of operating bandwidth and transmission group delay. However, the modulation based on the dispersion reconfiguration mainly comes from the variation of the cut-off frequency of SSPPs, it tends to present strong dispersion characteristics in this frequency range, which makes it difficult to achieve low group delay in a large bandwidth. On the other hand, due to the robustness of SSPPs, large spatial structural reconstructing is often required to achieve dispersive reconfiguration, which makes the regulation circuit more and more complex and inevitably introduces more parasitic parameters. These also make it difficult to be integrated on-chip.

In this paper, we propose a scheme to reconfigure the coupling process of SSPPs to achieve efficient modulation of terahertz waves. The coupling process of terahertz waves from on-chip quasi-TEM modes to SSPPs is regulated by the phase transmission of embedded VO2, and a full-band, low group delay, low insertion loss, and high switching ratio terahertz dynamic transmission structure is realized. At the same time, the presented structure has a small reconfiguration area, which is easy to realize multi-device integration.

2. Mechanism of coupling reconfiguration

The schematic of the presented dynamic SSPPs transmission structure is shown in Fig. 1(a), in which a coplanar grating (CG) consisting of a two-dimensional symmetric groove with a signal wire loading is fabricated on a quartz substrate. Terahertz waves are fed from the coplanar waveguide (CPW), and propagate on the CG in the mode of SSPPs. To enable the dynamic transformation of terahertz waves from quasi-TEM mode to SSPPs, a coupling area with VO2 film embedding is designed between the CPW and CG, as shown in Fig. 1(a). In this area, the gradually changed depth of the grooves provides the longitudinal electric fields and realizes the wave vector compensation to SSPPs.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) The schematic of the proposed terahertz dynamic transmission structure; (b) The dispersion relation of the symmetrical mode of SSPPs, in which the thickness of the quartz substrate is 50 µm, dielectric permittivity is 4.5 (and tangent of loss angle is 0.0004), the structure is composed of 44 periodic structures with a duty cycle of 66µm, the width of the signal line is 20µm, the depth of the groove in the periodic structure is 60µm, and the distance from the middle signal line is 50µm.; (c) The current distribution at 529 GHz; (d) The current distribution at 220 GHz.

Download Full Size | PDF

To make sense of the mechanism of the dynamic transmission structure, the propagation characteristic of SSPPs on the CG is studied at first. Figure 1(b) illuminates the dispersion of the symmetric mode, which is defined by the Ez field of SSPPs on the CG, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1(b). It is found that a strong dispersion character appears near the cut-off frequency of SSPPs, and the induced currents are mainly concentrated on the profile of the grooves, such as that at 529 GHz shown in Fig. 1(c). This is because, in the cut-off frequency region, the shorter wavelength indicates the boundary conditions are mainly determined by the grooves. Then the fields are confined to the grooves, and the coupling in CG is dominated by that between the grooves (groove-groove coupling, G-G coupling). While in the lower frequency region, the boundary conditions are determined by both the grooves and the signal wire for the larger wavelength, and then the field distribution is dominated by the coupling between the grooves and the signal wire (groove-signal wire coupling, G-S coupling). Accordingly, the induced currents are concentrated on the signal wire, such as that at 220 GHz shown in Fig. 1 (d). In this case, the propagating waves are perturbated by the space harmonic waves induced by the grooves to slow down the phase velocity, but the induced current distribution is still kept as that of the quasi-TEM mode, which makes the phase velocity in the promotion to the frequency. This indicates a shorter wavelength than TEM mode and a low group delay due to the weak dispersion character, which benefits the transmission of high-speed data on a small size chip.

Here, a piece of vanadium dioxide (VO2) is embedded into the signal wire in the transmission structure to modulate the terahertz waves, as shown in Fig. 1(a). For the physical states of VO2 can be controlled by laser illumination, the induced currents on the signal wire are adjusted, which results in the transmission control of terahertz waves. In this paper, the VO2 is described by the Drude model, whose parameters are adapted from Ref. [35,38,39]. And the geometry size is adjusted to match the impedance of VO2 and the middle signal line.

Figure 2 demonstrates the physical process of modulation. For the case of metallic VO2 shown in Fig. 2 (a), the conduction current propagates along the signal wire. In the coupling area, the gradually changed profile of the ground wires makes the current present a periodic perturbation, which induces the coupling between the grooves. Then the longitudinal electric fields are generated by the periodical current, and the wave vector is compensated between quasi-TEM and SSPPs modes. Thus, the terahertz waves are transformed into SSPPs modes and propagated along the grooves, corresponding to the “ON” state, as shown in Fig. 2(c).

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. The physical process of modulation: (a) The enlarged fields distribution in the transition area at “ON” status; (b) The enlarged fields distribution in the transition area at “OFF” status; (c) to (d): The fields distribution at 220 GHz for different VO2 conductivity

Download Full Size | PDF

When the embedded VO2 is changed from metallic to dielectric, the conduction current is blocked gradually, and the induced charges are accumulated, which indicates that the transformation coupling is reconfigured by VO2, as shown in Fig. 2 (b). On the one hand, the fields proposed to provide the longitudinal field and wave vector compensation, converge on the accumulated charges to form a quasi-static mode, which disables the phase matching between the terahertz waves and SSPPs. On the other hand, the variation of the physical state of VO2 brings the change of boundary condition, which also blocks the propagation of SSPPs. Accordingly, the terahertz waves are switched off by the decreasing conductivity of VO2, as shown in Fig. 2 (c) to(e).

3. Analysis of coupling reconfiguration

Based on the revealed mechanism of coupling reconfiguration, the SSPPs can be modulated in an ultra-wideband range that almost covers the whole region below the cut-off frequency. The S21 parameters and the group delay of the dynamic CG in the region from 110 GHz to 400 GHz, which are commonly used in terahertz communication, are illuminated in Fig. 3. First, thanks to the long-range character of the asymmetrical mode SSPPs, the proposed CG presents a rather low insertion loss, which is as low as 0.8 dB at 140 GHz, 0.55 dB at 220 GHz and 0.5 dB at 340 GHz for the VO2 with the conductivity of 2e5 S/m. Second, owing to the broadband characteristic of the generated quasi-static fields, the terahertz waves are switched off in a wide frequency range almost covering all the regions below the cut-off frequency. It is found in Fig. 3(a) that the CG is gradually switched off by the decreasing conductivity, and the switch ratio reaches 32 dB at 140 GHz, 29 dB at 220 GHz, and 17 dB at 340 GHz for 140 S/m. Furthermore, promising group delays, which are described by $- {{d({\arg ({{S_{21}}} )} )} / {d\omega }}$, are obtained for the weak dispersion. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the group delay difference appears within 1 ps in the frequency region from 110 to 170 GHz, within 2 ps from 170 to 260 GHz, and within 14 ps from 260 to 400 GHz, respectively. As a result, the characteristics of low insertion loss, high isolation, wide bandwidth, and low group delay difference indicate the promising potential for high data-rate transmission. It is also found that both the switch ratio and group delay deteriorated by the increasing frequency, this is because that the coupling reconfiguration is weakened due to the stronger and stronger G-G coupling.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a) The spectra of s21 of the proposed dynamic transmission structure; (b) The group delay of the proposed dynamic transmission structure, and the symbol Δ is the difference of group delay.

Download Full Size | PDF

According to the presented mechanism, the dynamic CG is caused by the accumulation of induced charges, which are mainly determined by the structural spatial relation. Figure 4 presents the insertion loss and isolation for different lengths of VO2 pieces. For the metallic state, because of the Ohm loss of VO2, the conduction currents attenuate exponentially, which induces the increase of insertion loss with increasing VO2 length, as shown in Fig. 4. For the dielectric state, with the increase of the VO2 length, weaker fields are generated on the next part of the signal wire, according to a larger switching ratio, as shown in Fig. 4.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. The insertion loss and switch ratio for different lengths of VO2 pieces.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In this paper, a dynamic transmission based on SSPPs coupling reconfiguration in a 2D coplanar grating is proposed. The reconfiguration region is constructed by embedding a VO2 film into the signal wire in the transitional region between the coplanar waveguide and gratings, and the coupling between the quasi-TEM waves and SSPPs is reconfigured by the phase transmission of the embedded VO2 film. When the VO2 is in the metallic state, the fed terahertz waves are coupled to the SSPPs mode through the coupling structure. When the VO2 is in the dielectric state, quasi-static fields are excited between the grating structure and the signal line to realize the reconfiguration of the coupling process, which destroys the wave vector compensation of the SSPPs coupling and blocks the terahertz wave transmission. On the one hand, thanks to the broadband characteristics of the quasi-static field, the fed terahertz waves can be modulated in the entire region below the cut-off frequency of SSPPs. This not only provides a rather wide bandwidth but also benefits a promising group delay due to the weak dispersion character of SSPPs in the region much lower than the cut-off frequency. On the other hand, the mechanism of coupling reconfiguration indicates that the robustness of SSPPs can be broken by a dynamic material with a rather small action area, which greatly simplifies the auxiliary circuit for SSPPs reconfiguration, and presents a great potential for on-chip integration of terahertz devices. Thus, based on this mechanism, many other terahertz modulation devices can be explored, such as modulators, phase shifters by Schottky diodes, and high electron mobility transistors. Accordingly, the presented mechanism paves a promising way for a high-performance terahertz modulation device.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFA1400121, 2018YFB1801503); National Natural Science Foundation of China (61771327, 61871419, 61901093, 61921002, 61931006, 62131007, U20A20212); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M683285); Sichuan Science and Technology Program under Contract (2022JDRC0004).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. K. Tekbıyık, A. R. Ekti, G. K. Kurt, and A. Görçin, “Terahertz band communication systems: challenges, novelties and standardization efforts,” Phys. Commun. 35, 100700 (2019). [CrossRef]  

2. Z. Chen, X. Ma, B. Zhang, B. Y. Zhang, Z. Niu, N. Kuang, W. Chen, L. Li, and S. Li, “A survey on terahertz communications,” China Commun. 16(2), 1–35 (2019). [CrossRef]  

3. X. Ma, Z. Chen, W. Chen, Y. Chi, Z. Li, C. Han, and Q. Wen, “Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced indoor terahertz communication systems,” Nano Commun. Netw. 24, 100284 (2020). [CrossRef]  

4. Z. T. Ma, Z. X. Geng, Z. Y. Fan, J. Liu, and H. D. Chen, “Modulators for terahertz communication: the current state of the art,” Research 2019, 1–22 (2019). [CrossRef]  

5. H. J. Song and N. Lee, “Terahertz communications: challenges in the next decade,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 12(2), 105–117 (2022). [CrossRef]  

6. H. T. Chen, W. J. Padilla, J. M. Zide, A. C. Gossard, A. J. Taylor, and R. D. Averitt, “Active terahertz metamaterial devices,” Nature 444(7119), 597–600 (2006). [CrossRef]  

7. T. G. Folland, A. Fali, S. T. White, J. R. Matson, S. Liu, N. A. Aghamiri, J. H. Edgar, R. F. Haglund, Y. Abate, and J. D. Caldwell, “Reconfigurable infrared hyperbolic metasurfaces using phase change materials,” Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4371 (2018). [CrossRef]  

8. T. Nagatsuma, G. Ducournau, and C. C. Renaud, “Advances in terahertz communications accelerated by photonics,” Nat. Photonics 10(6), 371–379 (2016). [CrossRef]  

9. C. M. Watts, X. Liu, and W. J. Padilla, “Metamaterial electromagnetic wave absorbers,” Adv. Mater. 24(23), 98–120 (2012). [CrossRef]  

10. W. J. Padilla and R. D. Averitt, “Imaging with metamaterials,” Nat. Rev. Phys. 4(2), 85–100 (2022). [CrossRef]  

11. T. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Yang, S. Liang, L. Wang, Y. Zhao, F. Lan, Z. Shi, and H. Zeng, “Efficient THz on-chip absorption based on destructive interference between complementary meta-atom pairs,” IEEE Electron Device Lett. 40(6), 1013–1016 (2019). [CrossRef]  

12. S. Gong, H. Zeng, Q. Zhang, C. Bi, L. Wang, T. Zhou, Z. Yang, Y. Zhang, F. Meng, Z. Zhang, and Y. Fang, “Terahertz meta-chip switch based on C-ring coupling,” Nanophotonics 11(9), 2037–2044 (2022). [CrossRef]  

13. H. Zeng, H. Liang, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, S. Liang, S. Gong, Z. Li, Z. Yang, X. Zhang, F. Lan, and Z. Feng, “High-precision digital terahertz phase manipulation within a multichannel field perturbation coding chip,” Nat. Photonics 15(10), 751–757 (2021). [CrossRef]  

14. C. Jiang, A. Cathelin, and E. Afshari, “A high-speed efficient 220-GHz spatial-orthogonal ASK transmitter in 130-nm SiGe BiCMOS,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 52(9), 2321–2334 (2017). [CrossRef]  

15. W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424(6950), 824–830 (2003). [CrossRef]  

16. C. R. Williams, S. R. Andrews, S. A. Maier, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, L. Martín-Moreno, and F. J. García-Vidal, “Highly confined guiding of terahertz surface plasmon polaritons on structured metal surfaces,” Nat. Photonics 2(3), 175–179 (2008). [CrossRef]  

17. Z. Shi, Y. Shen, and S. Hu, “Spoof surface plasmon polariton transmission line with reduced line-width and enhanced field confinement,” Int. J. RF Microw. 30(8), 22276 (2020). [CrossRef]  

18. B Qu, S Yan, A Zhang, Y Pang, and Z Xu, “Shared-aperture antennas based on mode modulation of a patch antenna and spoof surface plasmon polaritons,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55(4), 045002 (2022). [CrossRef]  

19. S. Wang, K. L. Chung, F. Kong, L. Du, and K. Li, “A compact wide-angle frequency beam-scanning antenna using modulated composite waveguide based on half-mode substrate integrated waveguide and spoof surface plasmon polariton structure,” AEU - Int. J. Electron. Commun 145(1), 154078 (2022). [CrossRef]  

20. K. D. Xu, Y. J. Guo, Q. Yang, Y. L. Zhang, and Q. Chen, “On-chip GaAs-based spoof surface plasmon polaritons at millimeter-wave regime,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 33(5), 255–258 (2021). [CrossRef]  

21. J. Zhang, X. Hu, H. Chen, and F. Gao, “Designer surface plasmons enable terahertz cherenkov radiation,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 169, 25–32 (2020). [CrossRef]  

22. C. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Xie, Y. Yang, J. Han, E. Li, H. Chen, J. Gu, E. I. Wei, and F. Gao, “Enhancing directivity of terahertz photoconductive antennas using spoof surface plasmon structure,” New J. Phys. 24(7), 073046 (2022). [CrossRef]  

23. H. Yan, L. Jing, J. Zhao, C. Niu, Y. Zhang, L. Du, and Z. Wang, “Broadband nonreciprocal spoof plasmonic phase shifter based on transverse Faraday effects,” Opt. Express 30(13), 24000–24008 (2022). [CrossRef]  

24. W. Y. Cui, J. Zhang, X. Gao, X. Zhang, and T. J. Cui, “Passive amplitude-phase modulations and sensing based on Mach–Zehnder interferometer of spoof surface plasmon polaritons,” J. Opt. 23(7), 075101 (2021). [CrossRef]  

25. H. F. Ma, X. Shen, Q. Cheng, W. X. Jiang, and T. J. Cui, “Broadband and high-efficiency conversion from guided waves to spoof surface plasmon polaritons,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8(1), 146–151 (2014). [CrossRef]  

26. M. Q. Dinh and M. T. Le, “Surface plasmon polaritons in time-modulated metallic materials for non-reciprocal controllable leaky-wave antennas,” IEEE Access 10(1), 28461–28470 (2022). [CrossRef]  

27. F. Ding and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “A review of unidirectional surface plasmon polariton metacouplers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25(3), 1–11 (2019). [CrossRef]  

28. M. A. Unutmaz and M. Unlu, “Spoof surface plasmon polariton delay lines for terahertz phase shifters,” J. Lightwave Technol. 39(10), 3187–3192 (2021). [CrossRef]  

29. S. Li, Q. Zhang, Z. Xu, H. Zhao, and X. Yin, “Phase transforming based on asymmetric spoof surface plasmon polariton for endfire antenna with sum and difference beams,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68(9), 6602–6613 (2020). [CrossRef]  

30. Y. J. Zhou and Q. X. Xiao, “Electronically controlled rejections of spoof surface plasmons polaritons,” J. Appl. Phys. 121(12), 123109 (2017). [CrossRef]  

31. Y. J. Guo, K. D. Xu, X. Deng, X. Cheng, and Q. Chen, “Millimeter-wave on-chip bandpass filter based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons,” IEEE Electron Device Lett. 41(8), 1165–1168 (2020). [CrossRef]  

32. L. Zhang, H. Zhang, M. Tang, P. He, L. Niu, L. Liu, J. Lu, W. Tang, J. Mao, and T. J. Cui, “Integrated multi-scheme digital modulations of spoof surface plasmon polaritons,” Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63(10), 202302 (2020). [CrossRef]  

33. H. C. Zhang, P. H. He, X. Gao, W. X. Tang, and T. J. Cui, “Pass-band reconfigurable spoof surface plasmon polaritons,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30(1), 134004 (2018). [CrossRef]  

34. H. Ling, B. Zhang, M. Feng, P. Qian, Y. Wang, Q. Wang, Y. Zhang, and A. Song, “Multi frequency multi-bit amplitude modulation of spoof surface plasmon polaritons by Schottky diode bridged interdigital SRRs,” Sci. Rep. 11(1), 19181 (2021). [CrossRef]  

35. T. Zhang, X. Y. Zhang, Q. Shi, X. Yang, S. Liang, Y. Fang, F. Meng, X. Song, Y. Zhao, H. Zeng, and L. Wang, “On-chip THz dynamic manipulation based on tunable spoof surface plasmon polaritons,” IEEE Electron Device Lett. 40(11), 1844–1847 (2019). [CrossRef]  

36. X. Gao, L. Zhou, and T. J. Cui, “Odd-mode surface plasmon polaritons supported by complementary plasmonic metamaterial,” Sci. Rep. 5(1), 9250 (2015). [CrossRef]  

37. Y. Liang, C. C. Boon, H. C. Zhang, X. L. Tang, Q. Zhang, and H. Yu, “A 13.5-Gb/s 140-GHz silicon redriver exploiting metadevices for short-range OOK communications,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 70(1), 239–253 (2022). [CrossRef]  

38. H. F. Zhu, L. H. Du, J. Li, Q. W. Shi, B. Peng, Z. R. Li, W. X. Huang, and L. G. Zhu, “Near-perfect terahertz wave amplitude modulation enabled by impedance matching in VO2 thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(8), 081103 (2018). [CrossRef]  

39. Z. Song and J. Zhang, “Achieving broadband absorption and polarization conversion with a vanadium dioxide metasurface in the same terahertz frequencies,” Opt. Express 28(8), 12487–12497 (2020). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) The schematic of the proposed terahertz dynamic transmission structure; (b) The dispersion relation of the symmetrical mode of SSPPs, in which the thickness of the quartz substrate is 50 µm, dielectric permittivity is 4.5 (and tangent of loss angle is 0.0004), the structure is composed of 44 periodic structures with a duty cycle of 66µm, the width of the signal line is 20µm, the depth of the groove in the periodic structure is 60µm, and the distance from the middle signal line is 50µm.; (c) The current distribution at 529 GHz; (d) The current distribution at 220 GHz.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The physical process of modulation: (a) The enlarged fields distribution in the transition area at “ON” status; (b) The enlarged fields distribution in the transition area at “OFF” status; (c) to (d): The fields distribution at 220 GHz for different VO2 conductivity
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) The spectra of s21 of the proposed dynamic transmission structure; (b) The group delay of the proposed dynamic transmission structure, and the symbol Δ is the difference of group delay.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The insertion loss and switch ratio for different lengths of VO2 pieces.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.