Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

High-temperature-sensitive and spectrum-contrast-enhanced sensor using a bullet-shaped fiber cavity filled with PDMS

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Low temperature sensitivity and low spectral contrast are serious but common issues for most Fabry Perot (FP) sensors with an air cavity. In this paper, a high-temperature-sensitive and spectrum-contrast-enhanced Fabry Perot interferometer (FPI) is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. The device is composed of a hollow cylindrical waveguide (HCW) filled with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and a semi-elliptic PDMS end face. The semi-elliptic PDMS end face increases the spectral contrast significantly due to the focusing effect. Experimentally, the spectral contrast is 11.97 dB, which is two times higher than the sensor without semi-elliptic PDMS end face. Ultra-high temperature sensitivity of 3.1501 nm/°C was demonstrated. The proposed sensor exhibits excellent structural stability, high spectral contrast and high temperature sensitivity, showing great potential in biomedicine, industrial manufacturing, agricultural production and other applications.

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Compared with other conventional sensors, the fiber optic sensors offer many inherent advantages such as high flexibility, high radiation resistance, compact size and low cost. Beyond that, the fiber optic sensors have been extensively used in microfluidic chips [1,2], structural health monitoring [3,4] and biochemical analysis [57]. Air-cavity-based fiber sensors have been widely studied for temperature sensing. However, spectral contrast is only several decibels [812], and the low thermo-optical coefficient of air also causes the temperature sensitivity to be smaller [13,14].

Vernier effect can considerably improve the sensing sensitivity. It has been extensively used in different types of interferometers, such as Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) [15,16], Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) [17,18] and Sagnac interferometer (SI) [19,20]. Moreover, Vernier effect has been used in the detection of various physical quantities such as temperature [21,22], strain [23,24], refractive index [14,25], humidity [26,27] and magnetic field [28,29] sensing.

Experimentally, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) has been used for temperature sensing due to its good hydrophobicity, high radiation resistance, high elasticity and high thermal-optical coefficient [30]. As of now, there have been several methods for filling liquid into hollow cylindrical waveguide (HCW). Yang et al. used the capillary effect to fill the mercury into HCW. However, it generated a bubble when splicing single-mode fiber (SMF) with HCW [31]. Because the presence of a bubble, the structural stability will decrease. Cao et al. delivered liquid to a fiber micro-cavity by employing femtosecond laser induced breakdown technology [32]. However, it is expensive to manufacture, and there is still some residual air in the cavity. At present, the main method to improve the spectral contrast is to reduce the Fabry Perot (FP) cavity length [33,34]. This will make the FSR larger and the vernier spectrum formed after spectral superposition is not obvious. Another method is to plate a metal film on the end face to improve reflectivity [35,36]. However, the metal film will oxidize and the thickness is not easy to control.

Here, a novel FPI composed of a HCW filled with PDMS and a semi-elliptic PDMS end face is proposed and fabricated. A groove is created by using a fiber optic polishing machine (FOPM) and fusion splicer, and the HCW can be filled with PDMS by using the capillary effect. Comparing with the sensor reported by Nan et al. [37], our sensor has higher spectral contrast. That is due to the focusing effect of the semi-elliptic PDMS end face. The Vernier effect was used to further improve the temperature sensitivity. Experiments show that the contrast of the reflection spectrum is many times higher than the previously reported FP sensor with a cylindrical air cavity. The temperature sensitivity can achieve −3.1501 nm/°C within the temperature range of 25°C-95°C, and the linear response is 0.9848. The proposed temperature sensor has the advantages of high sensitivity, high spectral contrast, compact size, low cost and convenient manufacturing. Undoubtedly, it will benefit applications in biomedicine, industrial production, aerospace and other fields.

2. Fabrication and principle

The structural diagram of the FP sensor is shown in Fig. 1(a). A section of HCW that has an oblique gap is fusion spliced with the SMF, and it is fully filled with PDMS. Additionally, there is a semi-elliptic PDMS structure at the end face of the HCW. Thus, the FPI is constructed of two mirrors M1, M2. Figure 1(b) is the polarizing microscope image of the sensor. The length of the FP cavity is 201.63 µm, and the surface of the semi-elliptic PDMS structure is relatively smooth.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the temperature sensor. (b) Polarizing microscope image of the temperature sensor.

Download Full Size | PDF

The SMF used in the experiment is Corning SM-28e with a core diameter of 9 µm and a cladding diameter of 125 µm. The length of the HCW is 181.29 µm, and the inner diameter of the HCW is 80 µm. The thermosensitive material used in the experiment, PDMS solution, was manufactured by thoroughly stirring basic agent (Sylgard 184-a) and curing agent (Sylgard 184-B) with a mixture ratio of 10:1. Then, the mixture is centrifuged to exclude the mixed air bubbles. The refractive index of the PDMS measured by the Abbe refractometer is 1.407.

The electric field component of the two reflective surfaces M1, M2 is expressed as [38]:

$${E_1}\textrm{ = }{E_0}\sqrt {{R_1}} \sqrt {1\textrm{ - }{C_1}} {e^{\textrm{ - }j\pi }}$$
$${E_2}\textrm{ }\textrm{ = }\textrm{ }{E_\textrm{0}}({1\textrm{ - }{R_1}} )\sqrt {{R_2}} \sqrt {1\textrm{ - }{C_2}} ({1\textrm{ - }{A_1}} )({1\textrm{ - }\alpha } ){e^{ - j4\pi L{n_0}\mathrm{/\lambda -\ }j\pi \,}}$$
where E0 is the incident electric field component, R1 and R2 represent the reflectivity of two reflective surfaces M1 and M2, respectively. C1 and C2 represent the reflection loss of two reflective surfaces M1 and M2, respectively. A1 is the transmission loss of reflective surface M1, α is the transmission loss in medium, L is the length of FP cavity, n0 is the refractive index of the medium, λ is the wavelength of incident light.

The total reflected electric field component is:

$$E\textrm{ = }{E_1}\textrm{ + }{E_2}$$

The light intensity can be calculated as:

$$I\textrm{ = |}\frac{E}{{{E_0}}}{\textrm{|}^\textrm{2}}$$
where E0 is the electric field component of the incident light. The total reflected light intensity of sensing FPI (FPIS) and reference FPI (FPIr) can be expressed as:
$${I_{s,r}}\textrm{ = }A\textrm{ + }B\textrm{ + }2C\cos \textrm{(4}\pi {L_{s,r}}n\textrm{/}\lambda \textrm{)}$$
Ls and Lr are represent the cavity length of sensing FPI and reference FPI, respectively. where A is R1(1-C1), B is (1-R1)2R2(1-C2)(1-A1)2(1-α)2, C is (1-R1)(1-A1)(1-α)$\sqrt {\textrm{(R1)}} $ $\sqrt {\textrm{(R2)}} \sqrt {\textrm{(1 - C1)}} \sqrt {\textrm{(1 - C2)}} $. In Eq. (5), when 4πLn/λm = (2m+1)π is satisfied, the reflectivity reaches a minimum, where m is a constant, λm represents the center of the wavelength of mth order, and it can be expressed as:
$${\lambda _m}\textrm{ = }\frac{{\textrm{4}Ln}}{{2m\textrm{ + }1}}$$

The FSR of FPIS and FPIr can be expressed as:

$$FS{R_{s,r}} = \frac{{{\lambda ^2}}}{{2{n_0}{L_{s,r}}}}$$

The vernier spectrum can be obtained by the following formula:

$${I_v}\textrm{ = }{I_s} + {I_r}$$

Figure 2(a), (b) show the optical path in the FP cavity without semi-elliptic PDMS and the optical path in the FP cavities with semi-elliptic PDMS, respectively. In the case of the flat end face, the incident light diffused into HCW and reflected at the PDMS-air interface, causing some optical loss and interference. However, the semi-elliptic PDMS structure allows more light reflected back to the SMF. Thus, the spectral contrast (difference between the maximum and minimum spectral values) of the sensor with a semi-elliptic end face will be higher.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a)The optical path of the sensor without semi-elliptic PDMS. (b) The optical path of the sensor with semi-elliptic PDMS.

Download Full Size | PDF

Two reflection spectra can be superimposed to form the Vernier effect, which can improve by multiple folds the sensing sensitivity. Figure 3(a), (b) are the reflection spectra calculated by Eq. (5). The two FP cavities length L1 and L2 are set 225 µm and 220 µm, respectively. The reflection loss and transmission loss are all set 0.1. The FSRs measured in Fig. 3(a), (b) are 3.78 nm and 3.49 nm, respectively. They agree well with the value (3.66 nm) calculated by Eq. (7). Figure 3(c) clearly shows the Vernier effect envelope.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a), (b) Reflection spectra of sensor with cavity lengths of 225 µm and 220 µm, respectively. (c) The Vernier effect were realized by superimposing two FP spectra from above.

Download Full Size | PDF

The Vernier effect amplification factor (M) can be expressed as:

$$M\textrm{ = }\frac{{FS{R_r}}}{{|{FS{R_r}\textrm{ - }FS{R_s}} |}}$$
where FSRr is the FSR of reference FPI. FSRs is the FSR of the sensing FPI.

The electric field distribution and reflection spectrum are obtained by using finite element analysis software Comsol. The refractive index of the SMF core is 1.462, the refractive index of the cladding is 1.45, the refractive index of PDMS is 1.407, the incident light wavelength is 1.55 µm, and the length of the cavity is 230 µm. Figure 4(a) shows the electric field distribution. It can see that the beam is reflected at the PDMS-air interface and reflected back to the SMF. The reflection spectrum is shown in Fig. 4(b). The FSR (3.71 nm) is almost consistent with the result calculated by Eq. (7).

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a) Electric field norm obtained by finite element analysis. (b) Reflection spectrum obtained by finite element analysis.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 5(a)-(f) illustrate the fabrication process of the temperature sensor. We firstly used a fiber fusion splicer (KL-280G) to fusion spliced a section of HCW (core diameter is 80 µm) with SMF. Then, the SMF-HCW structure was inserted into the fiber clamp of the FOPM, and the HCW against the sandpaper to form an oblique angle between the HCW and sandpaper. The polishing process requires just two minutes, and the air core was exposed to air. After that, the polished structure was fusion spliced with another SMF to form a groove and cut it by using the precise optical fiber cutting device. Thanks to the two grooves and capillary effect, the PDMS can automatically fill the entire air cavity. The PDMS was solidified by using a thermostatic heater, and the curing process requires 4 hours. After that, the solidified structure was vertically immersed into PDMS to form a semi-elliptic end face, and the curing process was repeated. As the above fabrication process, a PDMS cavity with high thermo-optical coefficient and a semi-elliptic PDMS end face with focusing effect have been successfully made. Thus, it can significantly improve the temperature sensitivity and the spectral contrast.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. The fabrication process of the FP sensor.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Experimental results and discussion

A temperature experimental setup was built to investigate the performance of this temperature sensor, as shown in Fig. 6. The incident light is derived from the supercontinuum sources (SC-5), and it can be guided into the 50:50 coupler through the circulator. The reflection spectrum is measured by the OSA (YOKOGAWA AQ6370B). The thermostatic heater (X1020TBD) is used to control environment temperature, and the two sensors FPI1 and FPI2 are connected with the 50:50 coupler. In order to make the sensor based on the Vernier effect achieves maximum sensitivity, FPI1 is put on the thermostatic heater, and FPI2 is put on the optical platform [14].

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. The experimental setup for temperature measurement.

Download Full Size | PDF

The differences between the sensor with semi-elliptic PDMS end face and the sensor without semi-elliptic PDMS end face have been investigated. As shown in Fig. 7(a), the sensor with a FP cavity length of 175.84 µm was produced. The reflection spectrum is indicated with black line, as presented in Fig. 7(c). The spectral contrast is 5.68 dB. When there is a semi-elliptic end face, the length of the FP cavity increases to 201.63 µm, as shown in Fig. 7(b). The reflection spectrum is indicated with orange line, as presented in Fig. 7(c). The spectral contrast is 11.91 dB. In summary, the change of spectral FSR is very small. The sensor with a semi-elliptic PDMS end face has higher spectral contrast, due to the focusing effect. This also helps to improve the quality factor. The higher quality factor is beneficial to reduce interference signals from irregular structures. Besides, it is more conducive to accurately finding the peak of the vernier spectrum and reducing the error.

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. (a) Polarizing microscope image of the sensor without semi-elliptic PDMS end face. (b) Polarizing microscope image of the sensor with semi-elliptic PDMS end face. (c) The reflection spectrum of the sensor with the cavity length of 175.84µm and 201.63µm, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 8(a), (b) show two reflection spectra of the sensors with different cavity lengths of 201.36 µm and 205.28 µm, and the two FSRs are 3.89 nm and 3.64 nm, respectively. The experimental results were in good agreement with the Eq. (7). We have used the spectrometer to scan the spectrum many times and the spectrum has no obvious deformation. It shows good stability. In addition, in the process of heating and cooling, the wavelength is almost unchanged at the same temperature. Therefore, the repeatability of the sensor is also good. After superimposing two FP spectra, the obvious envelope based on Vernier effect is observed, as shown in Fig. 8(c). To avoid interference from irregular structures, Fast Fourier transform (FFT) was applied to the Vernier effect envelope, as shown in Fig. 8(d). The shape of the filtered spectrum agrees well with Fig. 3(c). To observe the shift of the Vernier effect envelope more clearly, the upper envelope curve acquired by curve fitting is shown Fig. 8(d) in orange line.

 figure: Fig. 8.

Fig. 8. (a), (b) Reflection spectra of FP sensor with different cavities length of 201.36 µm and 205.28 µm, respectively. (c) The Vernier effect envelope obtained by superimposing two FP spectra. (d) FFT result corresponding to (c).

Download Full Size | PDF

The upper envelopes curve were obtained and shifted when the ambient temperature varies. With the increase in temperature, the envelope in Fig. 9(a) experienced a blue shift. Figure 9(b) shows the relationships between the temperature and the dip wavelength for different temperature values. By using the Vernier effect and PDMS with a high negative thermo-optical coefficient, this novel FPI exhibits an excellent linear response to external temperature variation, the achieved sensitivity being up to −3.1501 nm/°C with R2 of 0.9848.

 figure: Fig. 9.

Fig. 9. (a) The shift of the upper envelope with different temperatures in the range of 25-95°C. (b) The dip wavelength shift in response to the temperature change.

Download Full Size | PDF

The fabricated sensor is compared with other FP sensors and temperature sensors, as shown in Tables 1 and 2. It is clear that our sensor has the advantages of higher sensitivity and wider temperature detection range.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparison of the proposed sensor with other Fabry Perot sensor

Tables Icon

Table 2. Comparison of the proposed sensor with other temperature sensor using vernier effect

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, a temperature sensor with high sensitivity and high spectral contrast was proposed. Specifically, the sensor has a bullet-shaped fiber cavity filled with PDMS. The experiments demonstrate that, the contrast of reflection spectrum in such sensor can reach to 11.97 dB. By using the Vernier effect and PDMS, the sensor exhibits a high temperature sensitivity of −3.1501 nm/°C within the range of 25 to 95°C, and the linear response is 0.9848. The temperature sensitivity is several times higher than the previously reported temperature sensors. The proposed sensor has advantages of high sensitivity, high spectral contrast and simple manufacturing process, making it has great potential in temperature sensing applications.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11874010, 61965006); Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (2020GXNSFAA238040, 2021GXNSFAA075012, 2021GXNSFAA220057).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but maybe obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. C. Lin and C. Zhang, “Optofluidic gutter oil discrimination based on a hybrid-waveguide coupler in fibre,” Lab Chip 18(4), 595–600 (2018). [CrossRef]  

2. J. M. Zhu, Y. Shi, and X. Q. Zhu, “Optofluidic marine phosphate detection with enhanced absorption using a Fabry-Perot resonator,” Lab Chip 17(23), 4025–4030 (2017). [CrossRef]  

3. H. N. Li, D. S. Li, and G. B. Song, “Recent applications of fiber optic sensors to health monitoring in civil engineering,” Eng. Struct. 26(11), 1647–1657 (2004). [CrossRef]  

4. B. Ozbey, E. Unal, and H. Ertugrul, “Wireless displacement sensing enabled by metamaterial probes for remote structural helth monitoring,” Sensors 14(1), 1691–1704 (2014). [CrossRef]  

5. Q. Rong, H. Sun, and X. Qiao, “A miniature fiber-optic temperature sensor based on a Fabry-Perot interferometer,” J. Opt. 14(4), 045002 (2012). [CrossRef]  

6. Y. Wang, D. N. Wang, and C. R. Liao, “Temperature-insensitive refractive index sensing by use of micro Fabry-Perot cavity based on simplified hollow-core photonic crystal fiber,” Opt. Lett. 38(3), 269–271 (2013). [CrossRef]  

7. Y. T. Tseng, Y. J. Chuang, and Y. C. Wu, “A gold-nanoparticle-enhanced immune sensor based on fiber optic interferometry,” Nanotechnology 19(34), 345501 (2008). [CrossRef]  

8. H. Fayemeh, R. R. N. Omid, L. Azam, H. Amir, I. Z. Mohammad, and L. Hamid, “Self-referred microcavity-based fused-fiber fabry-perot refractometer,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 68, 102753 (2022). [CrossRef]  

9. B. Wang, Y. Niu, and S. Zheng, “A high temperature sensor based on sapphire fiber fabry-perot interferometer,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 32(2), 89–92 (2020). [CrossRef]  

10. R. Pan, W. Yang, and L. Li, “A High-Sensitive Fiber-Optic Fabry-Perot Sensor With Parallel Poly-Air Cavities Based on Vernier Effect for Simultaneous Measurement of Pressure and Temperature,” IEEE Sens. J. 21(19), 21577–21585 (2021). [CrossRef]  

11. J. Li, Z. Li, and J. Yang, “Micro fiber Fabry-Perot interferometer used as a temperature sensor and an optical modulator,” Opt. Laser Technol. 129, 106296 (2020). [CrossRef]  

12. J. N. Dash, Z. Liu, D. S. Gunawardena, and H. Y. Tam, “Fabry-Perot cavity-based contact force sensor with high precision and a broad operational range,” Opt. Lett. 44(14), 3546–3549 (2019). [CrossRef]  

13. Y. Cui, Y. Jiang, and T. Liu, “A dual-cavity Fabry-Perot interferometric fiber-optic sensor for the simultaneous measurement of high-temperature and high-gas-pressure,” IEEE Access 8, 80582–80587 (2020). [CrossRef]  

14. J. Li, M. Zhang, and M. Wan, “Ultrasensitive refractive index sensor based on enhanced Vernier effect through cascaded fiber core-offset pairs,” Opt. Express 28(3), 4145–4155 (2020). [CrossRef]  

15. H. Zhu, J. J. He, L. Shao, and M. Li, “Ultra-high sensitivity optical sensors based on cascaded two Fabry-Perot interferometers,” Sens. Actuators, B 277, 152–156 (2018). [CrossRef]  

16. P. Chen, Y. T. Dai, D. S. Zhang, X. Y. Wen, and M. H. Yang, “Cascaded-Cavity Fabry-Perot interferometric Gas Pressure Sensor based on Vernier Effect,” Sensors 18(11), 3677 (2018). [CrossRef]  

17. L. Hao, L. Ping, F. Xin, X. Jiang, and J. Zhang, “Sensitivity amplification of fiber-optic in line Mach-Zehnder Interferometer sensors with modified Vernier-effect,” Opt. Express 25(22), 26898–26909 (2017). [CrossRef]  

18. Z. Wang, L. Huang, C. Liu, H. Wang, and D. Yang, “Sensitivity-Enhanced Fiber Temperature Sensor Based on Vernier Effect and Dual In-Line Mach-Zehnder Interferometers,” IEEE Sens. J. 19(18), 7983–7987 (2019). [CrossRef]  

19. B. Wu, C. Zhao, and B. Xu, “Optical fiber temperature sensor with single sagnac interference loop based on vernier effect,” 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (CLEO-PR), S1095 (2017). [CrossRef]  

20. B. Wu, C. Zhao, B. Xu, and Y. Li, “Optical Fiber Hydrogen Sensor with Single Sagnac Interferometer loop Based on Vernier Effect,” Sens. Actuators, B 255, 3011–3016 (2018). [CrossRef]  

21. F. R. Wang, Y. J. Liu, Y. Lan, and L. Li, “High-sensitivity Fabry-Perot interferometer temperature sensor probe based on liquid crystal and the Vernier effect,” Opt. Lett. 43(21), 5355–5358 (2018). [CrossRef]  

22. X. Jia, X. Zhou, M. Bi, G. Yang, and T. Wang, “High-sensitivity optical fiber temperature sensor of cascaded FSI and MZI based on Vernier effect,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 65(26), 102625 (2021). [CrossRef]  

23. J. Tian, Z. Li, Y. Sun, and Y. Yao, “High-Sensitivity Fiber-Optic Strain Sensor Based on the Vernier Effect and Separated Fabry-Perot Interferometers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 37(21), 5609–5618 (2019). [CrossRef]  

24. L. G. Abbas, “Vernier Effect-Based Strain Sensor With Cascaded Fabry-Perot Interferometers,” IEEE Sens. J. 20(16), 9196–9201 (2020). [CrossRef]  

25. X. Fang, W. Zhang, and J. Li, “Signal processing assisted Vernier effect in a single interferometer for sensitivity magnification,” Opt. Express 29(8), 11570–11581 (2021). [CrossRef]  

26. C. Zhou, Q. Zhou, B. Wang, J. Tian, and Y. Yao, “High-sensitivity relative humidity fiber-optic sensor based on an internal-external Fabry-Perot cavity Vernier effect,” Opt. Express 29(8), 11854–11868 (2021). [CrossRef]  

27. S. Liu, G. Lu, D. Lv, M. Chen, and Z. Zhang, “Sensitivity enhanced temperature sensor with cascaded Sagnac loops based on harmonic Vernier effect,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 66, 102654 (2021). [CrossRef]  

28. Y. Zhao, X. X. Wang, R. Q. Lv, G. L. Li, H. K. Zheng, and Y. F. Zhou, “Highly Sensitive Reflective Fabry-Perot Magnetic Field Sensor Using Magnetic Fluid Based on Vernier Effect,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70, 1–8 (2021). [CrossRef]  

29. L. Y. Shao, L. Yuan, Z. Zhang, X. Zou, and L. Yan, “Temperature sensor with enhanced sensitivity by cascaded fiber optic Sagnac loops,” International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors.9157 (2014).

30. Y. Ju and W. Yang, “Displacement and acoustic vibration sensor based on gold nanobipyramids doped PDMS micro-fiber,” Opt. Express 26(24), 31889–31897 (2018). [CrossRef]  

31. K. M. Yang, J. He, Y. Wang, S. Liu, C. R. Liao, Z. Y. Li, G. L. Yin, B. Sun, and Y. P. Wang, “Ultrasensitive Temperature SENSOR Based on a Fiber Fabry-Perot Interferometer Created in a Mercury-Filled Silica Tube,” IEEE Photonics J. 7(6), 1–9 (2015). [CrossRef]  

32. K. J. Cao, Y. Liu, and S. L. Qu, “Quantitative microfluidic delivery based on an optical breakdown- driven micro-pump for the fabrication of fiber functional devices,” Opt. Express 25(20), 23690–23698 (2017). [CrossRef]  

33. J. Zhang, L. Hao, L. Ping, X. Jiang, X. Fu, and W. Ni, “Ultrasensitive Temperature Sensor With Cascaded Fiber Optic Fabry-Perot Interferometers Based on Vernier Effect,” IEEE Photonics J. 10(5), 1–11 (2018). [CrossRef]  

34. M. H. Carlos, M. H. David, H. R. Lvan, and V. Joel, “Single tapered fiber tip for simultaneous measurements of thickness, refractive index and distance to a sample,” Opt. Express 23(17), 22141–22148 (2015). [CrossRef]  

35. K. Tian, J. Yu, X. Wang, H. Zhao, and P. Wang, “Miniature Fabry–Perot interferometer based on a movable microsphere reflector,” Opt. Lett. 45(3), 787–790 (2020). [CrossRef]  

36. O. R. Ranjbar-Naeini, H. Latifi, M. I. Zibaii, and A. Mousavian, “Measurement of milli-Newton axial force and temperature using a hybrid microsilica sphere Fabry–Perot sensor,” Opt. Lett. 43(21), 5210 (2018). [CrossRef]  

37. T. Nan, B. Liu, and Y. Wu, “A three-parameter measurement optical fiber sensor based on a hybrid structure,” Appl. Opt. 59(27), 8190–8195 (2020). [CrossRef]  

38. Z. L. Ran, Y. J. Rao, W. J. Liu, X. Liao, and K. S. Chiang, “Laser-micromachined Fabry-Perot optical fiber tip sensor for high-resolution temperature-independent measurement of refractive index,” Opt. Express 16(3), 2252–2263 (2008). [CrossRef]  

39. L. Hou, B. Xu, J. Kang, C. Zhao, and S. Jin, “Sensitivity-enhanced Fabry-Perot filled with PDMS temperature sensor based on Vernier effect,” 2018 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP), 196 (2018). [CrossRef]  

40. M. G. Sigifredo, H. R. Ivan, M. A. Daniel A, M. Vladimir P, and T. C. Miguel, “In-Line Mach-Zehnder Interferometers Based on a Capillary Hollow-Core Fiber Using Vernier Effect for a Highly Sensitive Temperature Sensor,” Sensors 21(16), 5471 (2021). [CrossRef]  

41. T. Paixao, F. Araujo, and P. Antunes, “Highly sensitive fiber optic temperature and strain sensor based on an intrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometer fabricated by a femtosecond lase,” Opt. Lett. 44(19), 4833–4836 (2019). [CrossRef]  

42. X. Fu, R. Ran, and Q. Li, “A sensitivity-enhanced temperature sensor with end-coated PDMS in few mode fiber based on vernier effect,” Opt. Commun. 497, 127173 (2021). [CrossRef]  

43. H. Li and G. Abbas, “Temperature sensing by hybrid interferometer based on Vernier like effect,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 64(3), 102538 (2021). [CrossRef]  

44. L. Xie, B. Sun, M. Chen, and Z. Zhang, “Sensitivity enhanced temperature sensor with serial tapered two-mode fibers based on the Vernier effect,” Opt. Express 28(22), 32447–42455 (2020). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but maybe obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (9)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the temperature sensor. (b) Polarizing microscope image of the temperature sensor.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a)The optical path of the sensor without semi-elliptic PDMS. (b) The optical path of the sensor with semi-elliptic PDMS.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a), (b) Reflection spectra of sensor with cavity lengths of 225 µm and 220 µm, respectively. (c) The Vernier effect were realized by superimposing two FP spectra from above.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) Electric field norm obtained by finite element analysis. (b) Reflection spectrum obtained by finite element analysis.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. The fabrication process of the FP sensor.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. The experimental setup for temperature measurement.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. (a) Polarizing microscope image of the sensor without semi-elliptic PDMS end face. (b) Polarizing microscope image of the sensor with semi-elliptic PDMS end face. (c) The reflection spectrum of the sensor with the cavity length of 175.84µm and 201.63µm, respectively.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. (a), (b) Reflection spectra of FP sensor with different cavities length of 201.36 µm and 205.28 µm, respectively. (c) The Vernier effect envelope obtained by superimposing two FP spectra. (d) FFT result corresponding to (c).
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. (a) The shift of the upper envelope with different temperatures in the range of 25-95°C. (b) The dip wavelength shift in response to the temperature change.

Tables (2)

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparison of the proposed sensor with other Fabry Perot sensor

Tables Icon

Table 2. Comparison of the proposed sensor with other temperature sensor using vernier effect

Equations (9)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

E 1  =  E 0 R 1 1  -  C 1 e  -  j π
E 2    =    E 0 ( 1  -  R 1 ) R 2 1  -  C 2 ( 1  -  A 1 ) ( 1  -  α ) e j 4 π L n 0 / λ   j π
E  =  E 1  +  E 2
I  = | E E 0 | 2
I s , r  =  A  +  B  +  2 C cos (4 π L s , r n / λ )
λ m  =  4 L n 2 m  +  1
F S R s , r = λ 2 2 n 0 L s , r
I v  =  I s + I r
M  =  F S R r | F S R r  -  F S R s |
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.