Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

High-responsivity dual-band ultraviolet photodetector based on Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Ultraviolet photodetectors have aroused wide concern based on wide-band-gap semiconductors, such as GaN and Ga2O3. Exploiting multi-spectral detection provides unparalleled driving force and direction for high-precision ultraviolet detection. Here we demonstrate an optimized design strategy of Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure bi-color ultraviolet photodetector, which presents extremely high responsivity and UV-to-visible rejection ratio. The electric field distribution of optical absorption region was profitably modified by optimizing heterostructure doping concentration and thickness ratio, thus further facilitating the separation and transport of photogenerated carriers. Meanwhile, the modulation of Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure band offset leads to the fluent transport of electrons and the blocking of holes, thereby enhancing the photoconductive gain of the device. Eventually, the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure photodetector successfully realizes dual-band ultraviolet detection and achieves high responsivity of 892/950 A/W at the wavelength of 254/365 nm, respectively. Moreover, UV-to-visible rejection ratio of the optimized device also keeps at a high level (∼103) while exhibiting dual-band characteristic. The proposed optimization scheme is anticipated to provide significant guidance for the reasonable device fabrication and design on multi-spectral detection.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

In recent years, solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors (UV PDs) based on wide bandgap semiconductors have been broadly used in a variety of fields, such as environmental monitor, biological detection, astronomical exploration and ultraviolet communication [17]. Up to now, though various solar-blind UV PDs with different structures have been manufactured [8,9], there are still a large number of challenges in obtaining multi-spectral response and high-responsivity UV PD.

Due to their appropriate bandgap and intrinsic wavelength selectivity, wide bandgap semiconductor materials represented by GaN and Ga2O3 are outstanding candidates for the construction of UV PDs. Among kinds of GaN-based UV PDs, Schottky barrier diode (SBD) UV PD is one of the representative types owing to the simple fabrication process and prominent transient response [10]. However, GaN-based Schottky barrier diode UV PDs have the same problem as the other unipolar types PDs. The most striking issue is the high leakage current and low responsivity in the GaN-based Schottky barrier diode UV PDs. By contrast, Ga2O3, whose bandgap ranges from 4.7 eV to 4.9 eV, has also been fabricated for various unipolar type UV PDs, including metal-semiconductor-metal PDs and SBD PDs [1115]. However, it is challenging to improve the p-type doping of Ga2O3. Therefore, the Ga2O3-based bipolar devices such as p-i-n UV PDs are still limited to a great extent. Furthermore, obtaining a high responsivity and UV-to-visible rejection ratio for Ga2O3-based UV PDs is also an urgent problem to be solved.

Multi-spectral UV PD has good detection ability and can be widely used in optical communication, medicine and other fields. However, the research of multi-spectral PD mainly focuses on infrared band. Only a few publications have been published on the ultraviolet band [1618], and there are no comprehensive theoretical design models available.

In this work, we systematically proposed a Ga2O3/GaN ultraviolet photodetector with high responsivity, UV-to-visible rejection ratio and multi-spectral detection capability via comprehensive structure optimizations. The spectral response of the photodetector can be modulated effectively by optimizing the thickness ratio and doping concentration of light absorption layers. The simulated device after optimization showed a double absorption peak with a high responsivity of 892/950 A/W at 254/365 nm and a high UV-to-visible rejection ratio of 103.

2. Device structure and physical models

The vertical device structure diagram obtained through Silvaco TCAD software is shown in Fig. 1(a). The work functions of the anode and cathode were set to 5 eV and 3.93 eV, respectively. We exposed the device to UV light ranged from 230 nm to 450 nm with the direction of incidence perpendicular to the upper surface of the device. In addition, the thickness and doping concentration of light absorption layers play important parts in the detection performance of photodetectors. During the simulation, in order to achieve a UV PD with high performance by structural optimization, the thickness of GaN/Ga2O3 was set to vary from 200/160 nm to 1600/300 nm, and the doping concentration of GaN also had a scope of variation which ranged from 5 × 1015 to 5 × 1016 cm-3. The optical index coefficient of light absorption layers can be found in the works of Peelaers [19] and Muth [20] et al.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the high responsivity dual-band ultraviolet photodetector based on Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure. (b) Energy band diagram of the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure in equilibrium.

Download Full Size | PDF

The framework used in this device simulation is Poisson equation and continuity equation. Besides, Gummel and Newton nonlinear combinatorial iterative method were used to make the simulation results converge. In the process of simulation, we mainly used four types of physical models, which are mobility model, carrier recombination model, carrier generation model (impact ionization model and band-to-band tunneling model) and carrier statistical model (Fermi-Dirac statistical model), respectively. In the mobility model, the low-field mobility model (conmob) and the parallel electric field-dependent model (fldmob) are selected as the impurity concentration dependent mobility models at 300 K. In addition, the expressions of the carrier recombination model represented by Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) model, optical generation model and Auger model are listed as follows:

$${{R}_{{SRH}}}{= \; K\; (pn}\; \textrm{ - }\; {n}_{{ie}}^{2}{)}$$
$${{R}_{{OPT}}}{\; = \; C}_{c}^{{OPT}}{\; (pn}\; \textrm{ - }\; {n}_{{ie}}^{2}{)}$$
$${{R}_{{Auger}}}{\; = \; (}{{C}_{n}}{n + }{{C}_{p}}{p)(pn}\; \textrm{ - }\; {n}_{{ie}}^{2}{)}$$
Where ${K}$ and ${C}_{c}^{{OPT}}$ are Shockley-Read-Hall recombination coefficients and optical recombination coefficients respectively, ${{C}_{n}}$ and ${{C}_{p}}$ are temperature-dependent Auger recombination coefficients.

3. Results and discussions

In order to elaborate the transport principle of carriers in the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure, the energy band diagram is shown in the Fig. 1(b). At equilibrium, Ga2O3 and GaN have a conduction band offset, which can motivate further separation of photogenerated carriers [21]. Meanwhile, a low built-in potential barrier is generated at the heterostructure interface due to the conduction band offset between Ga2O3 and GaN. With this potential barrier, the flow of photogenerated electrons from Ga2O3 layer into GaN layer is thereby greatly accelerated. Instead, photogenerated holes in the valence band cannot be transported efficiently due to high valence band offset and low mobility. When a positive bias is applied to the GaN side, the degree of band bending in heterostructure interface becomes larger. This promotes it easier to transfer electrons from Ga2O3 to GaN and increases the barrier of photogenerated holes in GaN. The modulation of Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure band offset and electric field results in the transport of photogenerated electrons and the blocking of photo-excited holes, thereby enhancing the photoconductive gain of the device. Therefore, electrons will be continuously transported under the effect of electric field before the photogenerated carrier recombination, thus enhancing the photoconductive effect.

Responsivity (${R\; = \; }\frac{{{{I}_{{light}}}\; { \textrm{-} \; }{{I}_{{dark}}}}}{{{{P}_{{op}}}}}$) is an important parameter to characterize the performance of photodetectors, where ${{I}_{{light}}}$ and ${{I}_{{dark}}}$ stand for the current density under illumination and dark circumstance, respectively. In addition, ${{P}_{{op}}}$ means the power density of incidence light whose value is a constant in this work. Spectral response curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PD with different thicknesses of GaN are shown in Fig. 2(a). Meanwhile, the thickness of Ga2O3 and n-doping concentration of GaN is fixed at 200 nm and 1 × 1016 cm-3, respectively. As seen in Fig. 2(a), when the thickness of GaN ranges from 200 nm to 1500 nm, there are always two absorption peaks with varying intensity at wavelengths of approximately 254 nm and 365 nm corresponding to cut-off wavelengths of the two absorption layers. In addition, steep cut-off edges appear near the two absorption peaks, which is due to a larger response speed resulting from the plummet of absorption coefficient of the material. GaN exhibits an increasing trend in responsivity at the wavelengths of 230-254 nm with a maximum responsivity of up to 1931 A/W when its thickness varies from 200 nm to 1500 nm. The responsivity of wavelengths between 255 nm and 365 nm first increases and then falls with the increasing of GaN thickness, and the maximum responsivity in this waveband can be able to reach 618 A/W at the thickness of 600 nm. In the case of applying a positive bias on one side of GaN, the changing of GaN thickness will affect the electric field distribution of the heterostructure. Besides, the change trend of responsivity with electric field intensity will be explained in detail later. The two absorption peaks in these bands show a similar phenomenon in that they redshift as GaN thickness increases. The redshift of absorption peaks is attributed to the lack of optical dead space which is a region where photogenerated carriers are collected before recombination [22]. Due to the deep energy level in the GaN absorption layer, the device still shows an optical response when the incident wavelength is greater than 365 nm, which makes the electrons jump from the deep energy level to the conduction band and then form the photocurrent to generate the spectral response.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Spectral response curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different (a) GaN thickness and (b) GaN doping.

Download Full Size | PDF

The responsivity and rejection ratio of absorption peaks (254 and 365 nm) under various GaN thicknesses are displayed in Fig. 3(a) in order to better understand how the thickness of the GaN absorption layer affects the detection performance. From the perspective of responsivity, the responsivity of absorption peak at 254 nm decreases from 1157 to 123 A/W and that of absorption peak at 365 nm gradually increases from 50 to 497 A/W (at the thickness of 600 nm) before decreasing to 128 A/W as the thickness of GaN layer increases from 200 nm to 1500 nm, which is also consistent with the findings in Fig. 2(a). The rejection ratio, which is defined in this work as the ratio of responsivity at the wavelength of absorption peaks (254 nm and 365 nm) to 280 nm and 390 nm, is another crucial statistic to characterize the detection performance. Though R254/R390 and R365/R390 decreased gradually with increasing GaN thickness, they were still at high levels (1119 and 917, respectively) at the maximum intensity of 365 nm absorption peaks. To describe the relative intensity of absorption peaks, we additionally introduce R254/R280 and R365/R280. The rejection ratio of R254/R280 and R365/R280 at the thickness of 600 nm are 1.28 and 1.04, indicating high responsivity at the absorption peaks. Therefore, the value of 600 nm was determined as a fixed requirement in the subsequent optimization once the thickness of GaN had been optimized.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Responsivity and rejection ratio of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different (a) GaN thickness and (b) GaN doping. The red solid sphere and triangle represent the responsivity of the 254 nm and 365 nm absorption peaks, respectively. The blue solid (hollow) sphere and triangle represent the ratio of responsivity at 254 nm and 365 nm to 390 nm (280 nm), respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Device detection performance can be significantly impacted by doping of absorption layers. Therefore, we listed a series of GaN doping levels to modulate the responsivity and rejection ratio of Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs after optimizing the thickness of GaN absorption layer, as shown in the Fig. 2(b). There are always two absorption peaks in the spectral response when the doping of GaN absorption layer changes from 5 × 1015 to 5 × 1016 cm-3. At the wavelength of 230-254 nm, the responsivity of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PD increases with the doping concentration of GaN absorption layer and the maximum responsivity can be able to reach 1213 A/W with the doping concentration of 5 × 1016 cm-3. This is attributed to a markedly reduced voltage drop in the GaN region caused by the increasing doping concentration of GaN, which raises the voltage drop in the Ga2O3 region, thus enhancing the responsivity. On the contrary, the responsivity of the device steadily falls in the range of 255 nm to 365 nm as the doping of GaN absorption layer increases, while the maximum responsivity can still reach 1416 A/W when the doping concentration of GaN absorption layer is 5 × 1015 cm-3. Additionally, we found that the two absorption peaks have a blueshift with the increasing doping concentration of the GaN absorption layer, which can be attributed to the Moss-Burstein effect [23,24]. Namely, when the carrier concentration of n-type doping is too high and some electrons have occupied the conduction band, requiring more energy to make the electrons jump from the valence band to the conduction band.

The relationship between the responsivity and rejection ratio at the absorption peaks of 254 nm and 365 nm and the doping concentration of the GaN absorption layer is shown in Fig. 3(b), so as to further investigate the influence of the doping concentration of the GaN absorption layer on the device detection performance. According to Fig. 3(b), the rejection ratio of the device (R254/R390 and R365/R390) is generally in an upward trend when the doping concentration of GaN absorption layer increases, and the maximum values can be able to reach 2.76 × 105 and 1.37 × 103, respectively. Unfortunately, there is a rapid decline in the responsivity at the wavelength of 254/365 nm from 1139/1416 to 696/238 A/W when the doping concentration of GaN absorption layer increases from 5 × 1015 to 2 × 1016 cm-3. Therefore, there must be a trade-off between responsivity and rejection ratio. When the doping concentration of the GaN absorption layer is 1 × 1016 cm-3, the R254/R390 and R365/R390 of the device are 1119 and 917, respectively. At this time, the responsivity still remains at a high level (827/678 A/W correspond to 254/365 nm). Finally, we get to the conclusion that the ideal doping concentration for the GaN absorption layer is 1 × 1016 cm-3.

As shown in Fig. 4, the thickness and doping concentration of the GaN absorption layer can greatly affect the electric field distribution of the devices. Due to the energy band offset of the two absorption layers and the piezoelectric polarization effect at the interface, there are strong electric field spikes at the heterojunction of the two absorption layers from Fig. 4(a) and Fig. 4(c). In addition, Fermi level is found above the conduction band by observing the energy band. In the GaN absorption layer, some electrons transfer to the direction of cathode because the conduction band shifts downward with the increase of depth, so there is an electric field valley at the right side of the heterojunction. As can be seen from Fig. 4(b), taking the depth of 0.2 µm (0.35 µm) as an example, the electric field intensity of the device presents a trend of initially increasing and then monotonically decreasing with the increase of GaN thickness, which makes the responsivity of corresponding waveband of the device also present a same trend of first increasing and then monotonically decreasing with the increase of GaN thickness (see Fig. 2(a)). The same conclusion can be drawn in Fig. 4(d) that the electric field intensity at 0.2 µm (standing for Ga2O3 layer) /0.7 µm (standing for GaN layer) shows a monotonically increasing/decreasing trend with the increase of GaN doping, respectively. As a result, the responsivity of corresponding waveband of the device also exhibits the same changing trend (see Fig. 2(b)).

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a) Electric field intensity distribution curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different GaN thickness; (b) Electric field intensity versus the thickness of GaN at 0.2 µm (in Ga2O3 absorption layer) and 0.35 µm (in GaN absorption layer); (c) Electric field intensity distribution curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different GaN doping; (d) Electric field intensity versus the doping concentration of GaN at 0.2 µm (in Ga2O3 absorption layer) and 0.7 µm (in GaN absorption layer).

Download Full Size | PDF

Following the optimization of the GaN absorption layer, it is necessary for improving the detection performance to optimize the thickness of intrinsic Ga2O3 absorption layer. As is shown in Fig. 5(a), there is the relationship between Ga2O3 thickness and responsivity of Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs. When the wavelengths of incident light range from 230 nm to 254 nm, the responsivity of Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PD responds progressively as the thickness of Ga2O3 absorption layer. This increasing of responsivity at the waveband of 230-254 nm can be attributed to the increase of layer thickness so that more electrons transition to the conduction band to form photogenerated carriers. On the contrary, the responsivity in the 255-365 nm range decreases with the increasing Ga2O3 thickness, which is attributed to the significantly decreasing voltage drop in both GaN and Ga2O3 region. The effect of thickness of Ga2O3 absorption layer on the responsivity and rejection ratio at the wavelength of 254 and 365 nm has been described in the Fig. 5(b). As the thickness of Ga2O3 layer increases from 160 nm to 300 nm, the responsivity at 254/365 nm absorption peak reduces dramatically from 982/1258 to 792/108 A/W. This can be explained by Fig. 5(c) and Fig. 5(d) which show that different Ga2O3 thicknesses affect the distribution of the electric field intensity of the devices. Namely, the responsivities at 254 nm and 365 nm exhibit the similar variation trend because the electric field intensity in the Ga2O3 and GaN absorption layers decreases with the increasing of Ga2O3 thickness (take the depth of 0.2/0.7 µm as an example). In the view of rejection ratio, R254/R390 and R365/R390 still keep a high level (103-104) and have a tendency to increase continuously with thickness. As shown in the red line in Fig. 5(a), it is expected to achieve as larger responsivity as possible with a high rejection ratio, which can be obtained at the Ga2O3 thickness of 180 nm. At this time, both absorption peaks have relatively high intensity (both R254/R280 and R365/R280 > 1) and responsivities of the two absorption peaks are 892 and 950 A/W, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. (a) Spectral response curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different Ga2O3 thickness and (b) responsivity and rejection ratio of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different Ga2O3 thickness. The red solid sphere and triangle represent the responsivity of the 254 nm and 365 nm absorption peaks, respectively. The blue solid (hollow) sphere and triangle represent the ratio of responsivity at 254 nm and 365 nm to 390 nm (280 nm), respectively; (c) Electric field intensity distribution curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different Ga2O3 thickness; (d) Electric field intensity versus the thickness of Ga2O3 at 0.2 µm (in Ga2O3 absorption layer) and 0.7 µm (in GaN absorption layer).

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In summary, we obtained a Ga2O3/GaN dual-band ultraviolet photodetector with an ultrahigh responsivity and UV-to-visible rejection ratio by means of optimization strategy. An optimal device design scheme is presented by optimizing the thickness ratio and doping concentration of the heterostructure. It is shown by using numerous simulation calculations that the responsivities of Ga2O3/GaN dual-band ultraviolet photodetector can reach 892 and 950 A/W at the wavelength of 254 and 365 nm, respectively. Furthermore, UV-to-visible rejection ratio of the optimal scheme can be greater than three orders of magnitude. The high performance optimization scheme in this work will make important theoretical preparation for the reasonable design of multi-spectral UV photodetectors in the future.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB3604900); National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2141241, 62104095); Key R&D Project of Jiangsu (BE2021026); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M691500).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. F. Xie, Y. Gu, ZJ. Hu, BL. Yu, and GF. Yang, “Ultra-low dark current back-illuminated AlGaN-based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors with broad spectral response,” Opt. Express 30(13), 23756–23762 (2022). [CrossRef]  

2. SO. Kelley, CA. Mirkin, DR. Walt, RF. Ismagilov, M. Toner, and EH. Sargent, “Advancing the speed, sensitivity and accuracy of biomolecular detection using multi-length-scale engineering,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 9(12), 969–980 (2014). [CrossRef]  

3. G. Wu, LB. Tang, GR. Deng, LN. Liu, Q. Hao, SZ. Yuan, JY. Wang, H. Wei, YP. Zhao, B. Yue, JM. Shi, Y. Tan, RJ. Li, YY. Zhang, JC. Yan, XY. Yi, JX. Wang, JC. Kong, and JM. Li, “Transparent dual-band ultraviolet photodetector based on graphene/p-GaN/AlGaN heterojunction,” Opt. Express 30(12), 21349–21361 (2022). [CrossRef]  

4. L. Zhou, R. Wang, C. Yao, XM. Li, CL. Wang, XY. Zhang, CJ. Xu, AJ. Zeng, DY. Zhao, and F. Zhang, “Single-band upconversion nanoprobes for multiplexed simultaneous in situ molecular mapping of cancer biomarkers,” Nat. Commun. 6(1), 1–12 (2015). [CrossRef]  

5. QF. Lyu, HX. Jiang, and KM. Lau, “Monolithic integration of ultraviolet light emitting diodes and photodetectors on a p-GaN/AlGaN/GaN/Si platform,” Opt. Express 29(6), 8358–8364 (2021). [CrossRef]  

6. S. Aslam, L. Miko, C. Stahle, D. Franz, D. Pugel, B. Guan, JP. Zhang, and R. Gaska, “Dual-band deep ultraviolet AlGaN photodetectors,” Electron. Lett. 43(24), 1382–1384 (2007). [CrossRef]  

7. JJ. Xue, W. Zheng, and F. Huang, “Gallium oxide solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors: a review,” J. Mater. Chem. C 7(29), 8753–8770 (2019). [CrossRef]  

8. E. Monroy, E. Munoz, FJ. Sanchez, F. Calle, E. Calleja, B. Beaumont, P. Gibart, JA. Munoz, and F. Cusso, “High-performance GaN p-n junction photodetectors for solar ultraviolet applications,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 13(9), 1042–1046 (1998). [CrossRef]  

9. G. Parish, S. Keller, P. Kozodoy, JP. Ibbetson, H. Marchand, PT. Fini, SB. Fleischer, SP. DenBaars, UK. Mishra, and EJ. Tarsa, “High-performance (Al, Ga) N-based solar-blind ultraviolet p-i-n detectors on laterally epitaxially overgrown GaN,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 75(2), 247–249 (1999). [CrossRef]  

10. SJ. Chang, SM. Wang, PC. Chang, CH. Kuo, SJ. Young, TP. Chen, SL. Wu, and BR. Huang, “GaN Schottky barrier photodetectors,” IEEE Sens. J. 10(10), 1609–1614 (2010). [CrossRef]  

11. C. Yang, HW. Liang, ZZ. Zhang, XC. Xia, PC. Tao, YP. Chen, HQ. Zhang, RS. Shen, YM. Luo, and GT. Du, “Self-powered SBD solar-blind photodetector fabricated on the single crystal of β-Ga2O3,” RSC Adv. 8(12), 6341–6345 (2018). [CrossRef]  

12. R. Suzuki, S. Nakagomi, Y. Kokubun, N. Arai, and S. Ohira, “Enhancement of responsivity in solar-blind β-Ga2O3 photodiodes with a Au Schottky contact fabricated on single crystal substrates by annealing,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(22), 222102 (2009). [CrossRef]  

13. LP. Dong, JG. Yu, RX. Jia, JC. Hu, YM. Zhang, and JW. Sun, “Self-powered MSM deep-ultraviolet β-Ga2O3 photodetector realized by an asymmetrical pair of Schottky contacts,” Opt. Mater. Express 9(3), 1191–1199 (2019). [CrossRef]  

14. DY. Guo, ZP. Wu, PG. Li, YH. An, H. Liu, XC. Guo, H. Yan, GF. Wang, CL. Sun, LH. Li, and WH. Tang, “Fabrication of β-Ga2O3 thin films and solar-blind photodetectors by laser MBE technology,” Opt. Mater. Express 4(5), 1067–1076 (2014). [CrossRef]  

15. Y. Qin, HD. Sun, SB. Long, GS. Tompa, T. Salagaj, H. Dong, QM. He, GZ. Jian, Q. Liu, HB. Lv, and M. Liu, “High-performance metal-organic chemical vapor deposition grown epsilon-Ga2O3 solar-blind photodetector with asymmetric schottky electrodes,” IEEE Electron Device Lett. 40(9), 1475–1478 (2019). [CrossRef]  

16. A. Kalra, S. Vura, S. Rathkanthiwar, R. Muralidharan, S. Raghavan, and DN. Nath, “Demonstration of high-responsivity epitaxial β-Ga2O3/GaN metal–heterojunction-metal broadband UV-A/UV-C detector,” Appl. Phys. Express 11(6), 064101 (2018). [CrossRef]  

17. T. He, XD. Zhang, XY. Ding, C. Sun, YK. Zhao, Q. Yu, JQ. Ning, RX. Wang, GH. Yu, SL. Lu, K. Zhang, XP. Zhang, and BS. Zhang, “Broadband ultraviolet photodetector based on vertical Ga2O3/GaN nanowire array with high responsivity,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(7), 1801563 (2019). [CrossRef]  

18. ZD. Huang, RW. Chuang, WY. Weng, SJ. Chang, CJ. Chiu, and SL. Wu, “GaN schottky barrier photodetectors with a β-Ga2O3 cap layer,” Appl. Phys. Express 5(11), 116701 (2012). [CrossRef]  

19. H. Peelaers and CG. Van de Walle, “Sub-band-gap absorption in Ga2O3,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 111(18), 182104 (2017). [CrossRef]  

20. JF. Muth, JD. Brown, MAL. Johnson, ZH. Yu, RM. Kolbas, JW. Cook, and JF. Schetzina, “Absorption coefficient and refractive index of GaN, AlN and AlGaN alloys,” MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 4(S1), 502–507 (1999). [CrossRef]  

21. EG. Villora, K. Shimamura, K. Kitamura, K. Aoki, and T. Ujiie, “Epitaxial relationship between wurtzite GaN and β-Ga2O3,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(23), 234102 (2007). [CrossRef]  

22. T. Li, AL. Beck, C. Collins, RD. Dupuis, JC. Campbell, JC. Carrano, MJ. Schurman, and IA. Ferguson, “Improved ultraviolet quantum efficiency using a semitransparent recessed window AlGaN/GaN heterojunction p-i-n photodiode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 75(16), 2421–2423 (1999). [CrossRef]  

23. WS. Whitney, MC. Sherrott, D. Jariwala, WH. Lin, HA. Bechtel, GR. Rossman, and HA. Atwater, “Field effect photoelectronic modulation of quantum-confined carriers in black phosphorus,” Nano Lett. 17(1), 78–84 (2017). [CrossRef]  

24. H. M. Dong, J. Zhang, FM. Peeters, and W. Xu, “Optical conductance and transmission in bilayer graphene,” J. Appl. Phys. 106(4), 043103 (2009). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the high responsivity dual-band ultraviolet photodetector based on Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure. (b) Energy band diagram of the Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure in equilibrium.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Spectral response curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different (a) GaN thickness and (b) GaN doping.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Responsivity and rejection ratio of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different (a) GaN thickness and (b) GaN doping. The red solid sphere and triangle represent the responsivity of the 254 nm and 365 nm absorption peaks, respectively. The blue solid (hollow) sphere and triangle represent the ratio of responsivity at 254 nm and 365 nm to 390 nm (280 nm), respectively.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) Electric field intensity distribution curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different GaN thickness; (b) Electric field intensity versus the thickness of GaN at 0.2 µm (in Ga2O3 absorption layer) and 0.35 µm (in GaN absorption layer); (c) Electric field intensity distribution curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different GaN doping; (d) Electric field intensity versus the doping concentration of GaN at 0.2 µm (in Ga2O3 absorption layer) and 0.7 µm (in GaN absorption layer).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. (a) Spectral response curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different Ga2O3 thickness and (b) responsivity and rejection ratio of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different Ga2O3 thickness. The red solid sphere and triangle represent the responsivity of the 254 nm and 365 nm absorption peaks, respectively. The blue solid (hollow) sphere and triangle represent the ratio of responsivity at 254 nm and 365 nm to 390 nm (280 nm), respectively; (c) Electric field intensity distribution curves of the Ga2O3/GaN dual-band UV PDs under different Ga2O3 thickness; (d) Electric field intensity versus the thickness of Ga2O3 at 0.2 µm (in Ga2O3 absorption layer) and 0.7 µm (in GaN absorption layer).

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

R S R H = K ( p n  -  n i e 2 )
R O P T = C c O P T ( p n  -  n i e 2 )
R A u g e r = ( C n n + C p p ) ( p n  -  n i e 2 )
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.