Abstract

We show white light interferometer experiments that clearly demonstrate the basic differences between geometric and propagation phases. These experimental results also suggest a way to answer the “boundedness problem” in geometric phase—whether geometric phase is unbounded (i.e., can take on any values without limit) or bounded (i.e., limited to values between ${-}\pi$ and ${+}\pi$). We show why the answer to this question is not as easy as it seems, from both a theoretical and an experimental perspective, and explain how the answer depends on one’s choice of phase convention. We also hope that the videos provided will be pedagogically useful for explaining geometric phase.

© 2024 Optica Publishing Group

Wave description of geometric phase

Luis Garza-Soto, Nathan Hagen, Dorilian Lopez-Mago, and Yukitoshi Otani
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 40(2) 388-396 (2023)

Nulling interferometry by use of geometric phase

Naoshi Baba, Naoshi Murakami, and Tsuyoshi Ishigaki
Opt. Lett. 26(15) 1167-1169 (2001)

Generating a geometric mode for clarifying differences between an operator method and SU(2) wave representation

Ching-Hsu Chen and Chi-Feng Chiu
Opt. Express 15(20) 12692-12698 (2007)

Phase-shifting determination and pattern recognition using a modified Sagnac interferometer with multiple reflections

Abdullahi Usman, Apichai Bhatranand, Yuttapong Jiraraksopakun, Khalid Sabo Muhammad, and Prathan Buranasiri
Appl. Opt. 63(4) 1135-1143 (2024)

Full-field optical coherence tomography by achromatic phase shifting with a rotating polarizer

Yuuki Watanabe, Yasuhiro Hayasaka, Manabu Sato, and Naohiro Tanno
Appl. Opt. 44(8) 1387-1392 (2005)