Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Why was Reading Slower from CRT Displays than from Paper?

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Computer displays allow people to do many things that they could not do without them. Reading from these displays is a main behavioral activity that cuts across most uses of computers. Experiments have shown that people read more slowly from CRT displays than from paper, sometimes 20-30% slower (e.g., Gould & Grischkowsky, 1984). From 1983-1985, we conducted fifteen experiments and several more analyses in an effort to understand the cause of this reading difference. Initially, each experiment isolated one variable and studied whether that variable explained the difference (Gould, Alfaro, Barnes, Finn, Grishkowsky, and Minuto, 1987). Typically, experimental participants would proofread several pages of text in good quality fonts on Paper, and then (or before) proofread similar material from a computer-controlled CRT display. Proofreading time and accuracy was recorded, and the personal feelings of participants were also noted afterwards.

© 1989 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Reading: Effects of Contrast and Spatial Frequency1

Gordon E. Legge
ThB1 Applied Vision (AV) 1989

Reading with fixed and variable character pitch

Aries Arditi, Kenneth Knoblauch, and Ilana Grunwald
WCC5 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1989

Reading and Contrast Adaptation

Denis G. Pelli
ThB4 Applied Vision (AV) 1989

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.