Open Access
Add to BibSonomy
Abstract
We correct two errors in our publication [Appl. Opt. 60, 8896 (2021) [CrossRef] ].
© 2022 Optica Publishing Group
Fig. 8. Relationship between detectivity and optical power density of ${\rm{CsPbB}}{{\rm{r}}_3}$ MAs photodetector device under (a) 440 nm and (b) 530 nm irradiation at a bias of 2 V, respectively.
We found two errors in Ref. [1], and the corrections are as follows:
- 1. The ${\rm{y}}$-axis label in inset of Fig. 6(a) should be ${(\alpha h\upsilon)^2}$.
- 2. Figure 8 was given mistakenly during unit conversion. The corrected figure is shown.
Therefore, the $D*$ of the photodetector under 440 nm and 530 nm irradiation in the text should be corrected to ${1.24} \times {{1}}{{{0}}^{11}}$ Jones and ${1.44} \times {{1}}{{{0}}^{11}}$ Jones, respectively, which are still comparable with that of reported literatures in Table 1 even though we tested under a small bias of 2 V.
It should be mentioned that the main results, techniques, and conclusions presented in the published paper [1] would not be affected. The authors regret the careless mistake.
REFERENCE
1. L. Ren, K. P. Gao, Q. H. Tan, C. Qing, Q. J. Wang, P. Z. Yang, and Y. K. Liu, “High-performance perovskite photodetectors based on CsPbBr3 microwire arrays,” Appl. Opt. 60, 8896–8903 (2021). [CrossRef]
