Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Deterministic nonclassicality from thermal states

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Coupling an oscillator to a single two-level system is one of the most fundamental interactions in quantum physics. We report on a dynamical effect during which a thermal state of an oscillator is unconditionally transformed to a highly nonclassical state with negative Wigner function values by mere absorbtion by a single uncontrolled two-level system. This complements the traditional test of Rabi oscillations and it serves as a simply measurable witness that the process in question is highly nonclassical. The process is experimentally feasible with possible experimental implementation in a number of experimental platforms with intrinsic Jaynes-Cummings interaction and it has the potential of enabling deterministic generation of nonclassical quantum states.

© 2016 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

The most striking features of quantum physics, used as resources of modern quantum technologies [1–4], are those that can not be explained by any classical theory. These quantum states and quantum operations are naturally called nonclassical. Nonclassical quantum states of linear harmonic oscillators are best recognized by the presence of negative or singular values in their semiclassical quasi probability distributions [5–7]. An important kind of nonclassicality is bound to negative values of one particular quasidistribution, the Wigner function, and is considered a fundamental resource of advanced quantum information protocols, such as quantum computing [8–10]. The presence of negativity in Wigner function is directly measurable and it ensures that the state can not be replaced by a mixture of Gaussian quantum states.

Nonclassical processes are those that transform classical states into nonclassical ones. Again, the important nonclassical processes are those capable of generating states with negativity in Wigner function. Such processes offer a qualitative difference over both classical and linear dynamics of the oscillator and are necessary for preparation and processing of states for quantum information processing. The simplest example of such highly nonclassical process is a conditional addition (creation) of single quantum [11–15]. For classical states, this process always generates negativity in the Wigner function, even when the system was initially in a thermal state with arbitrary energy [5, 6]. This physical process is solely responsible for generation of optical single photon states that are the basic building blocks of all the optical discrete variable quantum information applications [16]. A conceptually similar process is a conditional subtraction (annihilation) of a single quantum [17, 18]. This process can be also used for generation of nonclassical states with non-positive Wigner function but for that that the initial state of the system already needs to be in a nonclassical squeezed state. As such, the conditional subtraction only converts one kind of nonclassicality into another one and it can not create nonclassicality in classical states on its own.

However, it is also possible to have a process that appears classical, but ultimately is not. Absorption is an elementary physical process in which energy of a given system S (for example, an oscillator) is collected by another system A (for example, a two-level system). From a macroscopic perspective, the rate of absorption does not depend on the energy of system S, which is damped linearly. This linear absorption is a classical process, because classical states of oscillator S, such as thermal states, can not be converted into non-classical ones. However, this model can be considered an approximation, in which the life-time of the excited level of the two level system is negligible. We can abandon this approximation and consider a situation, in which the absorption is performed by a single two-level system one quantum at a time. Such process is intrinsic to several modern experimental platforms, including for example single trapped ions which can absorb their mechanical energy [2], a single two-level atoms interacting with an electromagnetic radiation in optical resonator [1], or a single flux qubits absorbing electric energy of super-conducting LC circuit [4]. In the complete quantum picture, all these interactions are described within rotating wave approximation by the basic Jaynes-Cummings (J-C) model [19, 20]. Its presence was evidenced by the early experiments studying Rabi oscillations of two-level system without any measurements of the oscillator [21–23].

In this paper we study the state of the harmonic oscillator, initially in a thermal equilibrium, that is coupled to a single two-level system via Jaynes-Cummings interaction. In contrast to previous works and experiments, we consider only measurements performed on the oscillator, disregarding the two-level system entirely, see Fig. 1. We show that this deterministic dissipative process is highly nonclassical, capable of generating states with strongly negative Wigner functions even when the oscillator was initially found in a classical thermal state. This is the first account of nonclassicality of this kind being generated by a deterministic process without an external source of coherent energy. This is very important for harmonic oscillator quantum systems which are difficult to prepare in the ground state, such as vibrational modes of trapped molecular ions, solid state systems, and superconducting circuits. The noisy nature of those oscillators makes observation of any non-classical effect very difficult and the method we propose in this paper may be one of the first opportunities to do so. It should be stressed that it is not that the process is robust against the noise in the initial thermal state, but that it is actually driven by it. This is witnessed by the need for some minimal amount of thermal fluctuations before the nonclassicality can be observed. All these unexplored aspects of the absorbtion by a two-level system cannot be obtained in single-photon subtraction experiments [3]. The proposed process of generation of nonclassicality is also robust to an imperfect initial population of the two-level system, to its dephasing and to the detuning of the coupling laser field. We propose two experimental platforms for feasible tests of this effect. Repeated applications of this process can open a way to a qualitatively new way of generating non-classical states of quantum oscillator suitable for quantum technology.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Absorbtion of a quanta from quantum oscillator by a two-level with thermal populations unconditionally generates negative Wigner function from initially thermal state of the oscillator.

Download Full Size | PDF

2. Nonclassicality from absorption

In quantum physics, the elementary absorbtion of energy of the oscillator by a single two-level system is an unitary process described by a full Jayness-Cummings Hamiltonian H = H0 + HI, where H0 is the free evolution Hamiltonian of the joint system and HI describes the interaction between it parts [19–21]. The free evolution Hamiltonian H0=h¯ωσZ2+h¯νaa depends on transition frequency ω=EeEgh¯ of the two-level system, where Eg and Ee are the energies of the ground |g〉 and the excited |e〉 states, respectively and ν denotes the frequency of the oscillator. The operator σZ is inversion operator for the two-level system and a, a are oscillator’s creation and annihilation operators of the oscillator. We denote Δ = ων as the detuning parameter. In the rotating-wave approximation, Jaynes-Cummings interaction Hamiltonian HI = ih̄g(σ+aσa) describes the processes of energy exchange between the oscillator and the two-level system, where g is interaction strength and σ+, σ are two-level raising and lowering operators, respectively.

For the resonant absorbtion (Δ = 0) the interaction between the two systems can be represented by unitary operator

UJC=exp[h¯gt(σ+aσa)]=n=0(gt)n(σ+aσa)n.
We can exploit the specific properties of the raising and lowering operators, namely σ+σ=|e〉〈e| and σσ+ = |g〉〈g|, and split the series into four:
U=Agg(t)|gg|+Aee(t)|ee|+Aeg(t)|eg|+Age(t)|ge|,
where
Agg(t)=n=0(gt)2n(1)n(aa)n=cos(gtn),Aee(t)=n=0(gt)2n(1)n(aa)n=cos(gtn+1),Aeg(t)=n=0(gt)2n+1(1)n(aa)na=sin(gtn+1)n+1a,Age(t)=n=0(gt)2n+1(1)n(aa)na=sin(gtn)na,
and n = aa is the operator of the number of the oscillator quanta. When the two-level system is initially in the ground state, the resulting state of the oscillator can be obtained as
ρout=Trtls[Uρin|gg|U]=Agg(t)ρinAgg(t)+Aeg(t)ρinAeg(t),
where Trtls denotes partial trace over the two-level subsystem. The nonlinear aspect of this evolution is governed by terms n+1 and n in the arguments of the oscillating trigonometric functions. They describe the aperiodic exchange of energy between the oscillator and the two-level system. These terms have been found responsible for vacuum Rabi oscillations and the collapse-revival phenomena in the population of two-level systems. We will focus on their impact on Wigner functions of thermal equilibrium states.

For the initial thermal state of the oscillator given by density matrix ρTH=n=0ρTH(n)|nn|, where ρTH(n)=n¯n(1+n¯)1+n is Bose-Einstein statistics, the absorption event unconditionally results in density matrix

ρ(t)=n=0n¯n(1+n¯)1+ncos2(gtn)|nn|+n=1n¯n(1+n¯)1+nsin2(gtn)|n1n1|.
The initial Bose-Einstein distribution is now modulated by irrationally oscillating terms. Beating of these oscillations causes the overall behavior of the resulting state to be aperiodic and fairly complex. This complexity, however, brings out novel non-classical effects. This kind of interaction was already studied in the past, but at the time the attention has been paid to the two-level system [24]. Here we focus on the oscillator to complete the picture.

As an indicator of higher nonclassicality of the oscillator state ρ(t), we use negative values of Wigner function. The presence of negative values ensures that the state is incompatible with a mixture of Gaussian states, which can be prepared only with quadratic nonlinearities. The negativity is also a necessary aspect of quantum states needed for advanced quantum information tasks [8–10]. Wigner functions can be obtained as the mean value W(x, p; t) = Trρ(t)D(x, pD(x, p), where Π=2πn=0(1)n|nn| is the parity operator [25], and x and p are the respective values of quadrature operators X and P, with [X, P] = 2i, and D(x, p) = exp[−i(xP + pX)] is the displacement operator. When we look just at the point of origin the formula can be explicitly evaluated and simplified to

W(0,0;t)=2πn=0n¯n(1+n¯)1+ncos(2gtn).

Negativity of Wigner function is a well established sufficient criterion of nonclassicality. It is also a necessary prerequisite for some crucial quantum information tasks [8,9]. For Fock states |n〉 of the oscillator, the Wigner function Wn(x,p)=2π(1)nLn(4x2+4p2)exp(2x22p2) exhibits negative values. Here Ln corresponds to the Laguerre polynomial Here Ln corresponds to the Laguerre polynomial of n-th order. As the Fock number n increases, so does the number of negative regions and their distance from the point of origin. These regions of negativity are a definite sign of nonclassicality, meaning that the corresponding Wigner function can not be interpreted as a probability density of some hidden variables, and the state can not be obtained as a statistical mixture of Gaussian states.

When the oscillator in a thermal state is subject to the nonlinear absorption (5), the resulting state becomes strongly non-classical, which can be witnessed by observing negative values at the point of origin, see Fig. 2(a). These values arise unconditionally - after the interaction, the two level system is discarded without any measurement. The negativity is therefore not a direct consequence of correlations between the systems, but it appears purely as the effect of nonlinear dynamics incompatible with the classical linear absorption processes. The negative values appear as irregular oscillations and their presence is mostly independent on the mean energy of the initial thermal state with one exception: the energy can not be too low, the mean number of excitations roughly needs to surpass ∼ 2. The resulting nonclassicality is therefore clearly fuelled by the initial thermal energy. The minimum energy requirement can be easily understood by considering the properties of W(0, 0; t). This value is negative if the photon number distribution of the generated state has higher total weight of odd components compared to even ones. Since the vacuum term 〈0|ρ(t)|0〉 can never be reduced, as long as the initial state has 〈0|ρ(0)|0〉 ≥ 1/2 the produced state can never be nonclassical. This means that a necessary condition to observe any nonclassicality is initial state with > 1. In practice this requirement is slightly stricter because of higher Fock numbers and their more involved dynamics, but the basic reasoning remains. The reason why the nonclassicality is otherwise mostly independent on the energy of the oscillator may be gleaned from (6). There we can see that the initial mean energy serves only as a backdrop on which the nonclassical oscillating pattern produced by the absorption performs. As increases, the term n/(1 + )1+n becomes more and more uniform until it ends up completely irrelevant.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Negative values of W(0,0) for initial thermal states with mean energy undergoing absorption of a single photon with accumulated parameter gt. (a): ideal single atom absorption with the two level system in a ground state. (b): ideal single atom absorption with the two-level system being in a thermally excited state with Pe = 0.3. (c): single atom absorption in a detuned regime with g = 1, Δ = 5 and the two level system in a ground state. (d): single atom absorption with the two level system initially in a ground state undergoing loss (spontaneous emission into other modes) with g = 1 and γ = 0.015g.

Download Full Size | PDF

The negative values also appear only for stronger absorption corresponding to gtπ. The negative values of Wigner function thus cannot be observed in a short-time limit of the Jaynes-Cummings interaction. The process has both thermal and interaction length observability thresholds, which is the consequence of modulation of the Bose-Einstein statistic by the nonlinear terms. Maximum negativity for a given can be found by optimization of gt, which needs to be performed numerically.

The appearance of negative values does not require the two-level system starting in the ground state. As demonstrated in Fig. 2(b)., the negative values of Wigner function are generated even when the absorbing two-level system is initially in a state with relatively high energy. In this case the the two level system was initially in mixed state Pe|e〉〈e| + (1 − Pe)|g〉〈g| and the absorption transformed the state of the oscillator into

ρ(t)=Pej=ee,geAj(t)ρinAj(t)+(1Pe)j=gg,egAj(t)ρinAj(t).
The negative values are more rare, requiring both larger energy of the oscillator and longer time of the interaction, but they are always present. We have numerically verified this feature even in the high excitation limit in which the probability of excited state approaches Pe → 0.5.

The generation of negativity is a resonant effect and it therefore depends on detuning and dephasing of the two level system. To analyze this features we need to consider the total Hamiltonian in the rotating wave approximation H = Δσz + ih̄g(σ+aσa) and find the total dynamics of the system by solving master equation

ddtρ(t)=ih¯[H(ρ,t)]γ2h¯2[H,[H,ρ(t)]],
which describes two-level system dynamics under intrinsic decoherence and detuning with stochastic Poissonian time steps of unitary evolution [26]. This master equation has a formal solution [27] and, if we consider = 1 for simplicity, we can use it to arrive at density operator of the transformed system:
ρ(t)=n=014(2+Δ2/2(Δ/2)2+g2n+(2Δ2/2(Δ/2)2+g2n)cos(2t(Δ/2)2+g2n)×exp(2γt((Δ/2)2+g2n)))ρTH(n)|nn|+n=1g2n/2(Δ/2)2+g2n(1cos(2t(Δ/2)2+g2n)×exp(2γt((Δ/2)2+g2n)))ρTH(n)|n1n1|.
In Fig. 2(c) we can see that in case of detuning the negative values remain observable because the unitary dynamics is still preserved. On the other hand, dephasing counteracts the coherent evolution and, as can be seen in Fig. 2(d), allow observable negativities only for shorter times. In both cases, the main influence of the imperfections lies in narrowing the times for which the nonclassicality can be observed. The dependance on the initial state of the oscillator remains comparable to the ideal case.

The nonclassicality of the state produced by the single atom absorption is dependent on the initial thermal fluctuations. There is a certain minimal energy threshold that needs to be surpassed before the absorption produces a state with negative Wigner function. Then, as the thermal energy increases, so does the number of regions with negative values; see Fig. 3. Note that since the resulting states are phase insensitive, these figures provide the complete information about the produced quantum states. The states are strongly mixed. The mixedness, however, does not eliminate the highly nonclassical effects. The number of negative regions for a given gt is not necessarily an indicator of strength of the nonclassicality. On the other hand, the set of gt values which produce negativity gets enlarged with increasing , which indicates that for higher initial thermal energy the highly nonclassical states are more common. In this sense it is safe to say that the produced nonclassicality is powered by the initial thermal fluctuations.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Negative values of W(x, 0) undergoing the ideal single photon absorption with accumulated parameter gt. The two level system initially in a ground state. (a): = 2. (b): = 5. (c): = 10. (d): = 20.

Download Full Size | PDF

For each particular initial energy, the value of Wigner function at the origin oscillates between positive and negative values as the interaction progresses. This is the consequence of various lengths of the interaction differently accenting either odd or even Fock states. Fig. 4 demonstrates this effect by showing Wigner functions and photon number distributions P(n, t) = 〈n|ρ(t)|n〉 for the thermal state with = 10 and two different interaction lengths gt = 5.5 and gt = 2π. In this example, the odd Fock states are dominant and even Fock states are suppressed for ρ(5.5), while the reverse holds true for ρ(2π). We can see in Fig. 4(a) that the negativity is fairly strong, being of the same order as the maximal positive values of the Wigner function.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Thermal states undergoing the ideal single photon absorption with the two-level system being initially in a ground state. (a) W(x, p) for = 10 and gt = 5.5. (b) W(x, p) for = 10 and gt = 2π. (c) P(n) for = 10 and gt = 5.5. (d) P(n) for = 10 and gt = 2π. The line in figures (c) and (d) follows the coefficients of the initial thermal state.

Download Full Size | PDF

Let us now discuss in detail the differences between nonclassicality from saturable absorption and nonclassicality traditionally produced in quantum optical experiments by either photon subtraction [17, 18] or photon addition [11–15]. The main drawback of photon subtraction is that it needs the initial states to be nonclassical, specifically squeezed, in order to produce states with negative Wigner function. Subtracting a photon from a thermal state produces only a classical state. Photon addition is more nonclassical in this regard as it can produce negative Wigner functions even from thermal states. The nonclassicality is caused mainly by the artificial removal of the vacuum term. This, in combination with monotonously increasing the weight of higher Fock components, leads to overall increase of energy and reduction of purity of the state. The saturable absorption on the other hand generates nonclassicality by modulating the weights of Fock coefficients, reducing the state’s energy and increasing its purity. Another important difference lies in the probability of success of the operation. Single photon subtraction and addition experiments operate with a very low success probability of about 10−4 [13] whereas the saturable absorption is a deterministic process.

3. Repeated absorptions

The process of saturable absorption can produce quantum states that are nonclassical. Let us now investigate what specific states can be created in this way. If we apply the absorption repetitively, using a separate two-level system for each event, the initial thermal state will slowly converge towards vacuum state, unless the interaction constant is set to gt=πk where k is a positive integer. In that case the Kraus operator for absorption, Aeg (3), yields zero when applied to certain Fock states and, irrespectively to the initial thermal energy, the state is driven towards the form

ρ=m=0pm|km2km2|.
The resulting nonclassical state is still mixed but it has higher purity than the initial thermal state. The parameter k contributes to determining parity of the produced state. When k is even, so is the final state. When k is odd, both parities are present in the mixture and the initial thermal energy of the state determines which one becomes dominant. This explains why higher temperature can lead to more pronounced nonclassicality. Let us consider k = 1 as an example. When the temperature of the state is low, the vacuum term is dominant. As a consequence, the nonclassicality of the state is difficult to reveal. As the temperature increases, the proportion of the vacuum term gets reduced in favor of the Fock state |1〉, which is strongly nonclassical.

Fig. 5 shows the evolution of the initial thermal state subjected to the sequence of absorption events. We can see that the Fock coefficients not corresponding to squares of integers (for k = 1) or their doubles (for k=2) quickly vanish. This can be exploited for practical purposes, such as state preparation. For example, using sequences of absorption events with different interaction constants and different limit distribution can be used to depopulate all but Fock states, thus allowing generation of an impure number state p′N+1|N + 1〉〈N + 1|+ p′0|0〉〈0|. The main limitation is that the contribution of the vacuum term p0 can never be lowered by the deterministic method. On the other hand, it can be completely removed by probabilistically subtracting a single quantum from the oscillator. In optics, this can be effectively done even with detectors with a low quantum efficiency. This allows preparation of an arbitrary number state |N〉 from a thermal state by a sequence of deterministic absorption events and only a single feasible probabilistic measurement. Such state can be then used as a universal resource for quantum information processing [28]. It should be noted that this kind of preparation of a specific state is largely independent on the choice of the initial thermal state. All thermal states lead to the same output state and the only difference is the success probability of the last conditional subtraction.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 The number distribution P(n) of a thermal state with = 5 undergoing M absorption events with coefficient gt = π.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Nonclassicality from emission

A complementary process closely related to the considered process of absorption is associated with emission of a single quantum. A complementary effect appears when the two-level system is initially in the excited state. There are several ways of possible implementation. One is having the two-level system initially in excited state and using the standard Jaynes-Cummings interaction. Another way keeps the two level system in the ground state, but applies the counter-rotating J.-C. Hamiltonian HI = h̄κ(aσ+ + ). Physically, this corresponds for example to driving the first blue-detuned sideband instead of the red one for a trapped ion. In this case, the excitation of the two level system is accompanied by emission of a quanta, rather than its absorption, and the nonlinear dynamics is qualitatively different.

As the oscillator receives the single quantum of energy, the state ρth is evolved to:

ρblue=n=0n¯n(1+n¯)1+n[cos(gtn+1)]2|nn|+n=0n¯n(1+n¯)1+n[sin(gtn+1)]2|n+1n+1|.
This can be also expressed as
ρblue=n¯+1n¯n=0n¯(n¯+1)n+1×[n¯n¯+1cos2(gtn+1)+sin2(gtn)]=2n¯+1n¯ρthn¯+1n¯ρred.
Again, ρred refers to (5). The results in terms of Wigner function negativities are visualized in Fig. 6. From there it can be seen that the main result remains the same. It is still possible to unconditionally generate a non-classical state of the oscillator exhibiting multiple regions of Wigner function negativity. Comparing Fig. 6 with Fig. 3 reveals that the emission produces more regions of larger negativity than the absorption. This is a natural consequence of the structure of the operations. For the absorption, the only nonclassical effect is the irrational fluctuation of the Fock coefficients as the actual absorption of a quantum, represented by operator a, fails to produce nonclassical states from classical ones. On the other hand, the emission has the same irrationally fluctuating terms resulting in similar dependency on the thermal energy of the system, but they are accompanied by the addition of quantum a which strongly contributes to nonclassicality on its own. Interestingly enough, the parity of the produced states is flipped. This can be seen by comparing Fig. 3 and Fig. 6, but it also follows from
n¯ρblue+(n¯+1)ρred=(2n¯+1)ρth,
where ρth is the density matrix of the initial state and ρred is the red detuned one (5). It is now apparent that for no parameters and at no phase space coordinates can the Wigner functions obtained by these two regimes be negative at the same time. We may now conclude that, with respect to he initial thermal energy of the oscillator, the nonclassicality from the emission behaves comparably to nonclassicality from the absorption, while the dependency on the interaction coefficients gt shows complementarity.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 Negative values of W(x, 0) for thermal states undergoing the evolution in the blue-detuned sideband regime. (a): = 2. (b): = 5. (c): = 10. (d): = 20.

Download Full Size | PDF

5. Experimental feasibility

The verification of both the fundamental aspects of nonclassical saturable absorption and the ability to prepare new highly nonclassical states is an interesting prospect. Currently, the experiment can be performed with cavity and circuit quantum electrodynamics or with mechanical states of trapped ions. For a single ion trapped in a Paul trap, coupling between the ion’s electronic states on a long-lived transition and ion’s motion in the Lamb-Dicke regime naturally appears in the form of J-C Hamiltonian. Presented calculations suggest that desired Wigner distributions with multiple negativity regions would be observable with experimental parameters and phonon numbers corresponding well to the Lamb-Dicke approximation [2]. Considering typical trapping parameters corresponding to ωtrap ∼ (2π) 1MHz, Lamb-Dicke parameter η ∼ 0.1, carrier transition Rabi frequency Ω ∼ (2π) 100kHz and laser-ion interaction on long-lived transition with coherence times at the order of milliseconds [29], coupling parameter g on the first motional sidebands would correspond to gηΩ = (2π) 10kHz. The number of coherent Rabi cycles for a single ion in such setup can easily reach gt > 10 without any substantial decrease of the oscillation contrast [2] and thus allows the proposed observation of several Wigner function negativity areas, as depicted in Fig. 3. Furthermore, the motional state of trapped ion after laser cooling conveniently corresponds to thermal distribution as a result of thermal equilibrium with an external reservoir [2]. The resulting Wigner distribution can be reconstructed using one of the well developed methods based on application of controlled coherent displacements to ion’s motion followed by the measurement of its populations in the Fock state basis [23]. Recent experimental results suggest that motional populations of up to n=10 phonons can be reliably estimated [30]. Together with an unprecedent control and measurement sensitivity to individual recoils this further demonstrates the convenience of ion trapping setups for experimental tests of the proposed generation of nonclassical states [31].

Alternatively, the proposed scheme could be tested in any other experimental platform where prominent interaction is governed by the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian and which provides necessary degree of control over this coupling. In cavity-QED setups utilizing high-Q microwave resonator, for example in [32–34], a high quality of direct probing of Wigner function will also allow to observe highly nonclassical effects of the absorption process. Thermal state of microwave field inside the cavity can be easily obtained from an external thermal source weakly coupled to the cavity. Recently, a preparation of high-quality quantum states with multiple negative islands of the Wigner function appeared in circuit-QED experiments, where well controllable J-C interaction is also available [35–39].

6. Conclusion and outlook

We have identified a highly nonclassical process capable of transforming highly classical states into highly nonclassical ones. The process, the naturally occurring saturable absorption by a single two-level systems, is set apart from the previously known nonclassical processes (single quantum addition, for example) by being deterministic and requiring no external coherent sources of energy. Both of these properties contribute towards its general feasibility. The proposed scheme can be easily implemented in most of existing systems governed by the fundamental J.-C. interaction and becomes extremely useful for platforms where reaching the ground state of the oscillator’s mode corresponds to a challenging task. Beyond the fundamentally interesting discovery of a deterministic highly nonclassical process, the presented work could be further extended by considering a sequence or combination of the absorption and emission events to further improve quality of the generated states. The presented approach will likely pave the way for further studies of other available nonlinear processes and their tests for analogical, or even more interesting, thermally induced nonclassical effects. We foresee a direct applications of our scheme for generation and tests of macroscopic quantum nonclassicality and for preparation of nonclassical states suitable for quantum information processing [9, 28] or precision measurements [40].

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by grant No. GB14-36681G of the Czech Science Foundation.

References and links

1. J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, “Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565–582 (2001). [CrossRef]  

2. D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, “Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281–324 (2003). [CrossRef]  

3. M. Bellini and A. Zavatta, “Manipulating light states by single-photon addition and subtraction,” Prog. Opt. 55, 41–83 (2010). [CrossRef]  

4. Z.-L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, “Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 623–653 (2013). [CrossRef]  

5. R. J. Glauber, “Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,” Phys. Rev. 131, 2766–2788 (1963). [CrossRef]  

6. E. C. G. Sudarshan, “Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277–279 (1963). [CrossRef]  

7. T. Richter and W. Vogel, “Nonclassicality of quantum states: a hierarchy of observable conditions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 283601 (2002). [CrossRef]  

8. E. Kot, N. Gronbech-Jensen, B. M. Nielsen, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, E. S. Polzik, and A. S. Sorensen, “Breakdown of the Classical Description of a Local System,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 233601 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. A. Mari and J. Eisert, “Positive Wigner functions render classical simulation of quantum computation efficient,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230503 (2012). [CrossRef]  

10. C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garca-Patrn, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, “Gaussian quantum information,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621–669 (2012). [CrossRef]  

11. G. S. Agarwal and K. Tara, “Nonclassical character of states exhibiting no squeezing or sub-poissonian statistics,” Phys. Rev. A 46, 485–488 (1992). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. C. T. Lee, “Theorem on nonclassical states,” Phys. Rev. A 52, 3374–3376 (1995). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. R. Kumar, E. Barrios, C. Kupchak, and A. I. Lvovsky, “Experimental characterization of Bosonic creation and annihilation operators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 130403 (2013) [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. A. Zavatta, V. Parigi, and M. Bellini, “Experimental nonclassicality of single-photon-added thermal light states,” Phys. Rev. A 75, 052106 (2007). [CrossRef]  

15. T. Kiesel, W. Vogel, M. Bellini, and A. Zavatta, “Nonclassicality quasiprobability of single-photon-added thermal states,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 032116 (2011). [CrossRef]  

16. J.-W. Pan, Z.-B. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, and M. Żukowski, “Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 777–838 (2012). [CrossRef]  

17. M. S. Kim, E. Park, P. L. Knight, and H. Jeong, “Nonclassicality of a photon-subtracted Gaussian field,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 043805 (2005). [CrossRef]  

18. L. Hu, X. Xu, Z. Wang, and X. Xu, “Photon-subtracted squeezed thermal state: nonclassicality and decoherence,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 043842 (2010). [CrossRef]  

19. E.T. Jaynes and F.W. Cummings, “Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser,” Proc. IEEE 51, 89–109 (1963). [CrossRef]  

20. B. W. Shore, “Sir Peter Knight and the JaynesCummings model,” J. Mod. Opt. 54, 2009–2016 (1993). [CrossRef]  

21. J. H. Eberly, N. B. Narozhny, and J. J. Sanchez-Mondragon, “Periodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1323–1326 (1980). [CrossRef]  

22. G. Rempe, H. Walther, and N. Klein, “Observation of quantum collapse and revival in a one-atom maser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 353–356 (1987). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. D. Leibfried, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, “Experimental determination of the motional quantum state of a trapped atom,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4281–4285 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. P. L. Knight and P. M. Radmore, “Quantum revivals of a two-level system driven by chaotic radiation,” Phys. Lett. A 90, 342–346 (1982). [CrossRef]  

25. E. P. Wigner, “On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. 40, 749–759 (1932). [CrossRef]  

26. G. J. Milburn, “Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. A 44, 5401–5406 (1991). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. H. Moya-Cessa, V. Bužek, M. S. Kim, and P. L. Knight, ”Intrinsic decoherence in the atom-field interaction,” Phys. Rev. A 48, 3900–3905 (1993). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. P. Marek and J. Fiurášek, “Resources for universal quantum-state manipulation and engineering,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 062321 (2009). [CrossRef]  

29. P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, J. T. Barreiro, E. Martinez, S. Wang, Shannon, S. Quint, M. Brandl, V. Nebendahl, C. F. Roos, M. M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich, and R. Blatt, “A quantum information processor with trapped ions,” New J. Phys. 15, 123012 (2013). [CrossRef]  

30. D. Kienzler, H.-Y. Lo, B. Keitch, L. de Clercq, F. Leupold, F. Lindenfelser, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevitsky, and J. P. Home, “Quantum harmonic oscillator state synthesis by reservoir engineering,” Science 347, 53–56 (2015). [CrossRef]  

31. C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, P. Jurcevic, R. Gerritsma, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, “Entanglement-enhanced detection of single-photon scattering events,” Nat. Photonics 7, 630–633 (2013). [CrossRef]  

32. M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Hagley, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Quantum Rabi oscillation: a direct test of field quantization in a cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1800–1803 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

33. S. Deleglise, I. Dotsenko, C. Sayrin, J. Bernu, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence,” Nature 455, 510–514 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

34. C. Sayrin, I. Dotsenko, X. Zhou, B. Peaudecerf, T. Rybarczyk, S. Gleyzes, P. Rouchon, M. Mirrahimi, H. Amini, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states,” Nature 477, 73–77 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

35. J. M. Fink, M. Göppl, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, P. J. Leek, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, “Climbing the JaynesCummings ladder and observing its n nonlinearity in a cavity QED system,” Nature 454, 315–318 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

36. M. Hofheinz, H. Wang, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, J. Wenner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, “Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator,” Nature 459, 546–549 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

37. C. Eichler, D. Bozyigit, C. Lang, L. Steffen, J. Fink, and A. Wallraff, “Experimental state tomography of itinerant single microwave photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 220503 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

38. G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, H. Paik, E. Ginossar, M. Mirrahimi, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon Kerr effect,” Nature 495, 205–209 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

39. B. Vlastakis, G. Kirchmair, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Deterministically encoding quantum information using 100-photon Schrdinger cat states,” Science 342, 607–610 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

40. D. Braun, P. Jian, O. Pinel, and N. Treps, “Precision measurements with photon-subtracted or photon-added Gaussian states,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 013821 (2014). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Absorbtion of a quanta from quantum oscillator by a two-level with thermal populations unconditionally generates negative Wigner function from initially thermal state of the oscillator.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Negative values of W(0,0) for initial thermal states with mean energy undergoing absorption of a single photon with accumulated parameter gt. (a): ideal single atom absorption with the two level system in a ground state. (b): ideal single atom absorption with the two-level system being in a thermally excited state with Pe = 0.3. (c): single atom absorption in a detuned regime with g = 1, Δ = 5 and the two level system in a ground state. (d): single atom absorption with the two level system initially in a ground state undergoing loss (spontaneous emission into other modes) with g = 1 and γ = 0.015g.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Negative values of W(x, 0) undergoing the ideal single photon absorption with accumulated parameter gt. The two level system initially in a ground state. (a): = 2. (b): = 5. (c): = 10. (d): = 20.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Thermal states undergoing the ideal single photon absorption with the two-level system being initially in a ground state. (a) W(x, p) for = 10 and gt = 5.5. (b) W(x, p) for = 10 and gt = 2π. (c) P(n) for = 10 and gt = 5.5. (d) P(n) for = 10 and gt = 2π. The line in figures (c) and (d) follows the coefficients of the initial thermal state.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 The number distribution P(n) of a thermal state with = 5 undergoing M absorption events with coefficient gt = π.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Negative values of W(x, 0) for thermal states undergoing the evolution in the blue-detuned sideband regime. (a): = 2. (b): = 5. (c): = 10. (d): = 20.

Equations (13)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

U J C = exp [ h ¯ g t ( σ + a σ a ) ] = n = 0 ( g t ) n ( σ + a σ a ) n .
U = A g g ( t ) | g g | + A e e ( t ) | e e | + A e g ( t ) | e g | + A g e ( t ) | g e | ,
A g g ( t ) = n = 0 ( g t ) 2 n ( 1 ) n ( a a ) n = cos ( g t n ) , A e e ( t ) = n = 0 ( g t ) 2 n ( 1 ) n ( a a ) n = cos ( g t n + 1 ) , A e g ( t ) = n = 0 ( g t ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 ) n ( a a ) n a = sin ( g t n + 1 ) n + 1 a , A g e ( t ) = n = 0 ( g t ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 ) n ( a a ) n a = sin ( g t n ) n a ,
ρ out = Tr tls [ U ρ in | g g | U ] = A g g ( t ) ρ in A g g ( t ) + A e g ( t ) ρ in A e g ( t ) ,
ρ ( t ) = n = 0 n ¯ n ( 1 + n ¯ ) 1 + n cos 2 ( g t n ) | n n | + n = 1 n ¯ n ( 1 + n ¯ ) 1 + n sin 2 ( g t n ) | n 1 n 1 | .
W ( 0 , 0 ; t ) = 2 π n = 0 n ¯ n ( 1 + n ¯ ) 1 + n cos ( 2 g t n ) .
ρ ( t ) = P e j = e e , g e A j ( t ) ρ in A j ( t ) + ( 1 P e ) j = g g , e g A j ( t ) ρ in A j ( t ) .
d d t ρ ( t ) = i h ¯ [ H ( ρ , t ) ] γ 2 h ¯ 2 [ H , [ H , ρ ( t ) ] ] ,
ρ ( t ) = n = 0 1 4 ( 2 + Δ 2 / 2 ( Δ / 2 ) 2 + g 2 n + ( 2 Δ 2 / 2 ( Δ / 2 ) 2 + g 2 n ) cos ( 2 t ( Δ / 2 ) 2 + g 2 n ) × exp ( 2 γ t ( ( Δ / 2 ) 2 + g 2 n ) ) ) ρ TH ( n ) | n n | + n = 1 g 2 n / 2 ( Δ / 2 ) 2 + g 2 n ( 1 cos ( 2 t ( Δ / 2 ) 2 + g 2 n ) × exp ( 2 γ t ( ( Δ / 2 ) 2 + g 2 n ) ) ) ρ TH ( n ) | n 1 n 1 | .
ρ = m = 0 p m | km 2 km 2 | .
ρ blue = n = 0 n ¯ n ( 1 + n ¯ ) 1 + n [ cos ( g t n + 1 ) ] 2 | n n | + n = 0 n ¯ n ( 1 + n ¯ ) 1 + n [ sin ( g t n + 1 ) ] 2 | n + 1 n + 1 | .
ρ blue = n ¯ + 1 n ¯ n = 0 n ¯ ( n ¯ + 1 ) n + 1 × [ n ¯ n ¯ + 1 cos 2 ( g t n + 1 ) + sin 2 ( g t n ) ] = 2 n ¯ + 1 n ¯ ρ th n ¯ + 1 n ¯ ρ red .
n ¯ ρ blue + ( n ¯ + 1 ) ρ red = ( 2 n ¯ + 1 ) ρ th ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.