Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Temperature-controlled terahertz polarization conversion bandwidth

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Active control of metasurfaces has attracted widespread attention because of the adjustable electromagnetic properties obtained. Here we designed and experimentally studied a dynamically controllable polarization converter in the terahertz band. By designing the structural parameters and utilizing the insulator-to-metal phase transition of vanadium dioxide and principle of current resonance, dynamic tunability of the polarization conversion function from dual-broadband (0.45∼0.77 THz and 0.97∼1.2 THz) to ultra-broadband (0.38∼1.20 THz) can be realized with a high polarization conversion ratio. The scheme proposed here can find potential applications in integrated terahertz systems, sensing, imaging and communications areas.

© 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Over the past decades, remarkable advances have been made in terahertz [13] functional devices such as modulators [4, 5], absorbers [6, 7], splitters [8, 9] and polarizers [1012]. In particular, terahertz polarization devices play a significant role in almost all branches of terahertz application systems. For example, in practical terahertz sensing and imaging systems, it is necessary to control the efficiency and bandwidth of polarization devices to improve the sensitivity and resolution of these systems [13, 14]. Traditional polarization conversion devices usually require large crystals to accumulate enough phase [15], which are not applicable in practical systems, so small size polarization conversion devices should be designed to develop the next generation of compact and lightweight terahertz systems. Artificially constructed subwavelength metasurfaces [1618] are attractive due to their ability to manipulate electromagnetic waves arbitrarily. In previous single-layer metasurfaces [19, 20], it has shown that they can produce polarization conversion in the terahertz band, but their bandwidths and polarization conversion ratios are limited. Currently, multilayer metasurfaces remain important options for achieving broadband and efficient terahertz polarization conversion [21, 22]. Recently, it has been discovered that wideband terahertz polarization conversion and asymmetric transmission based on coupled dielectric-metal gratings can be realized experimentally [23]. Highly efficient and broadband linear polarization to circular polarization conversion can also be accomplished at terahertz frequencies by the judicious design of birefringent metasurfaces [24]. Although the above mentioned multilayer metasurfaces have reported broadband polarization conversions, their bandwidth ranges are still limited. Moreover, they all rely on static geometry to produce the desired optical responses, which is also detrimental to practical applications.

Recently, switchable and multi-functional metasurface devices have gradually flourished and can modulate the electromagnetic responses via thermal, electrical, optical stimuli. Different means of modulating metasurfaces have been reported, such as semiconductor materials (silicon and conductive oxides) [2527], 2D materials (graphene and perovskite) [28, 29], phase change materials [vanadium dioxide (VO2) and chalcogenide GeSbTe (GST)] [30, 31] and nonlinear materials [32, 33]. All these methods have shown excellent ability to modulate the electromagnetic response. Among the known transition metal oxides so far, VO2 has been widely used because of its low insulator-to-metal phase transition temperature. For example, a recent demonstration of a VO2 based frequency tunable metasurface filter realized terahertz phase and polarization modulation [34]. In addition, a switchable VO2 integrated coding metasurface for wavefront and polarization manipulation of terahertz beams has been demonstrated numerically [35]. Most recently, temperature-controlled chirality, optical activity, and negative refractive index were observed in a terahertz metamaterial based on 3D-chiral metallic resonators and achiral VO2 inclusions [36]. Yet, most of these reported studies on VO2-based metamaterials/metasurfaces are for the control of the resonant frequency, field amplitude or the phase (polarization). All of these designs give no active control of the polarization conversion bandwidth.

Here we demonstrate a dynamically controllable broadband linear polarization converter at THz frequencies. The device is a metasurface consisting of a five-layer structure, including a sapphire substrate, a layer of VO2 and gold split-ring resonators (SRRs), a polyimide dielectric layer, and a grating structure. By designing the structural parameters and utilizing the insulator-to-metal phase transition of VO2, the dynamic tunability of the polarization conversion function from dual-broadband (0.45∼0.77 THz and 0.97∼1.2 THz) to ultra-broadband (0.38∼1.20 THz) can be realized with a high polarization conversion ratio (PCR) via thermal stimuli. Simulation and experimental results show that there are two spike-like high-efficiency polarization conversion bandwidths on both sides of 0.85/0.92 THz, and the PCR can reach up to 95% at low conductivity of VO2 and room temperature. With the increase of the VO2 temperature and conductivity, the gold SRRs gradually change from asymmetric to symmetric, so that the amplitude of the valley and the PCR in the 0.85/0.92 THz band gradually increase until reaching the level of the two adjacent peaks. This process enables dynamic modulation of the bandwidth of the polarization conversion, changing from dual-band at low temperature to ultra-broadband at high temperature. Furthermore, for the proposed metasurface, the polarization conversion amplitude at the resonance frequency between the two transmission windows is greatly sensitive to the temperature, and the resonance frequency can be flexibly adjusted as well. These properties enable the designed metasurface promising in the fields of terahertz sensing, secret communication and imaging.

2. Structure and design

Figure 1(a) shows the unit cell, where the period is P = 80 µm. To fabricate the structure, we first grow a 150-nm-thick VO2 film on a sapphire substrate with a thickness of h = 2000 µm and fabricate a layer of VO2 SRRs with two obliquely symmetrical openings by lithography. Second, we engrave a layer of three-opening gold SRRs with a 200-nm-thickness on the processed VO2 structure, in which the opening O along the -45° direction is key to producing cross-polarization conversion, and O1 is key to generating the resonance. The specific parameters of the gold SRRs are R = 35 μm and R0 = 30 μm, and the split line of the two symmetrical O = 10° openings forms an angle of 45° with respect to the x-axis, and the split line of O1 forms C1= 30° with respect to the x-axis, as shown in Fig. 1(c). The two symmetrical openings of the gold SRRs are the same in size and direction as those of the VO2 SRRs. In a second lithography step, a gold grating is formed on top an isotropic polyimide layer with a thickness of t = 35 μm that is coated on a 5-inch SiO2 substrate. Then the gold grating and polyimide layer separated from the SiO2 substrate is assembled with the prefabricated sample consisting of sapphire substrate, VO2 and gold SRRs under a microscope. The grating structural parameters are: d1 = 10 µm, d2= 22 µm, and d = 200 nm. A schematic diagram of the vertical view of the metasurface unit cell is given in Fig. 1(b). Figures 1(d)–1(f) show the optical microscope images of the fabricated gold SRR array, gold grating and their combined structure, respectively. We use a transmission-type THz time-domain spectroscopy system (THz-TDS) [see Fig. 1(g)] to characterize the spectral response of the metasurface. To characterize the fabricated sample, four broadband terahertz wire grid polarizers are required. A wire grid polarizer is placed between the first two off-axis parabolic mirrors to obtain y-polarized wave as the incidence. The metasurface sample is placed at the focus of the second and third off-axis parabolic mirrors.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the metasurface structure and experimental system. (a) Unit cell, composed of sapphire substrate, VO2 and gold SRRs layers, polyimide dielectric layer and a gold grating, with geometrical parameters h = 2000 µm, P = 80 µm, d = 200 nm, t = 35 µm, d1 = 10 µm, and d2= 22 µm. (b) Vertical view of the unit cell. (c) Gold SRR with geometrical parameters O = 10°, O1 = 10°, C1= 30°, and C2= 45°. (d)-(f) Optical microscope images of the fabricated VO2 and gold SRRs, gold grating and their combined structure, respectively. (g) Sample characterization by THz-TDS.

Download Full Size | PDF

We use the electromagnetic simulation software CST Microwave Studio to design and optimize the spectral performance of the polarization conversion metasurface. In the simulation, we set the electric field along the y direction (y-linear polarization) as the excitation source, and use periodic boundary conditions in the x and y directions, and open boundary conditions in the + z direction. VO2 is modeled by the Drude model, where the relative permittivity εVO2 = 9, the temperatures are 296 K and 363 K corresponding to the fully insulated and metallic states respectively, and the two correspond respectively to the frequency-independent conductivity σlow = 10 S/m and σhigh = 2.6 × 105 S/m. The dielectric layer is composed of lossy polyimide with a relative permittivity of εpolymide = 2.93 + 0.044 i. The relative permittivity of sapphire is εsapphire = 9.67. The amplitude transmittance is defined as $|{T_{yy}}(\omega )|= |E_{yy}^{tr}(\omega )|/|E_{yy}^{re}(\omega )|$ and $|{T_{xy}}(\omega )|= |E_{xy}^{tr}(\omega )|/|E_{yy}^{re}(\omega )| , $where $E_{yy}^{tr}(\omega )$ and $E_{xy}^{tr}(\omega )$ represent the electric fields transmitted through the metasurface (superscript tr), and $E_{yy}^{re}(\omega )$ and$E_{xy}^{re}(\omega )$ are the electric fields through the reference sample (superscript re). In addition, the phase difference ${\delta _{\rm diff}} = \phi xy - \phi yy = \arg ({T_{xy}}(\omega )) - \arg ({T_{yy}}(\omega ))$ and the PCR ${\rm PCR}_{xy}(\omega ) = |{T_{xy}}(\omega ){|^2}/(|{T_{xy}}(\omega ){|^2} + |{T_{yy}}(\omega ){|^2})$ and ${\rm PCR}_{yy}(\omega ) = |{T_{yy}}(\omega ){|^2}/(|{T_{xy}}(\omega ){|^2} + |{T_{yy}}(\omega ){|^2})$ between the two orthogonal polarizations are extracted from the data.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Results

We have characterized the transmission characteristics of the metasurface, simulated VO2 as a function of its conductivity [Fig. 2(a)], and carried out experimental measurements as a function of temperature [Fig. 2(b)]. In the simulation shown in Fig. 2(a), when VO2 has a low conductivity (10 S/m), the cross-polarization |Txy| forms a valley in the vicinity of 0.85 THz frequency due to the existence of the O1 opening in the gold SRRs, and the formed two windows have 3 dB bandwidth of 0.32 THz (0.45∼0.77 THz) and 0.23 THz (0.97∼1.2 THz) respectively, showing a peak-valley-peak state as a whole. The PCRxy in this dual-band can reach up to 95%. With the gradual increase of the VO2 conductivity, the VO2 film state gradually changes from the insulator to the metal phase, and the opening O1 in each gold SRRs is gradually connected. Therefore, the cross-polarization amplitude |Txy| gradually increases, while the co-polarization transmission amplitude |Tyy| basically does not change. When the VO2 conductivity reaches 2.6×105 S/m, the amplitude |Txy| at 0.77∼0.97 THz has changed from the initial valley to the current peak, and is basically equal on the two sides. Now the polarization conversion 3 dB bandwidth is 0.82 THz (0.38∼1.20 THz). The corresponding PCRxy can reach more than 97%. The transition process from dual-broadband to ultra-wideband operation fully embodies the dynamic control function of VO2 on the polarization conversion bandwidth.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Transmission amplitude and PCR for simulation and experiment. (a) Simulated frequency dependence of co- and cross-polarization amplitudes and PCR for y-linear polarization incidence with VO2 conductivity ranging from 10 S/m to 2.6 × 105 S/m. (b) Measured frequency dependence of co- and cross-polarization amplitudes and PCR for y-linear polarization incidence at temperatures ranging from 296 K to 363 K.

Download Full Size | PDF

We have modeled a metasurface with a conductivity from 10 to 2.6 × 105 S/m for VO2 and compared the performance of the metasurface measured in the experimentally achievable temperature range from 296 K to 363 K. The experimental results are shown in Fig. 2(b), where at room temperature (296 K), the VO2 structure is equivalent to a transparent insulator and hardly affects the electromagnetic response characteristics of the structure. Therefore, the combined VO2 and gold structures are equivalent to gold SRRs functioning only. As the temperature increases, VO2 undergoes an insulator-to-metal phase change. At this time, the O1 opening in each gold SRRs is connected, and the electromagnetic response also changes. The cross-polarization |Txy| near 0.92 THz changes from a valley to a peak, and the co-polarization |Tyy| is basically unchanged. Therefore, the polarization converter is converted from low-temperature dual-broadband to high-temperature ultra-wideband. The electromagnetic response measured in the experiments and the calculated PCR are in good agreement with the simulation. However, compared with the simulation, there are some deviations in the actual measurement. For example, the transmission amplitude in the 0.92 THz∼1.4 THz frequency band is significantly reduced, and the valley of the transmission amplitude near 0.92 THz has a blue shift, which may be due to sample processing or experimental measurement. In general, the polarization conversion metasurface achieves dynamic control of the polarization conversion bandwidth and broadens the band of polarization conversion.

In order to visually describe the transformation of the polarization state in the process of electrical conductivity and temperature changes, we use the following Stokes parameters [10]:

$$\begin{array}{l} {S_0} = |{T_{yy}}{|^2}\textrm{ + }|{T_{xy}}{|^2},\\ {S_1} = |{T_{yy}}{|^2}\textrm{ - }|{T_{xy}}{|^2},\\ {S_\textrm{2}} = \textrm{2}|{T_{yy}}||{T_{xy}}|\cos \delta {}_{\rm diff},\\ {S_\textrm{3}} = \textrm{2}|{T_{yy}}||{T_{xy}}|\sin \delta {}_{\rm diff}, \end{array}$$
where S0 describes the relative intensity between x-linear polarization and y-linear polarization, S1 is the dominance of x-linear polarization over y-linear polarization, S2 and S3 represent the phase information. Based on these parameters, we can obtain the normalized ellipticity χ:
$$\sin (2\chi ) = \frac{{{S_3}}}{{{S_0}}} , $$
where |χ| = 0 is for linear-polarization and |χ| = 1 is for circular-polarization.

As shown in Fig. 3(a), as the VO2 conductivity increases, the absolute value of the normalized ellipticity χ evolves from a low value (0.85, -0.22) to a maximum (0.84, 0.40) first at 0.85 THz, which clearly shows that the initial y-linear polarization gradually converts to elliptical polarization (Txy and Tyy coexist). Then χ gradually decreases to near 0 (0.85, -0.08), indicating that the elliptical polarization gradually changes to x-linear polarization. The change of the overall normalized ellipticity χ vividly demonstrates the dynamic control function of VO2 on the valley around 0.85 THz. Figure 3(b) shows the normalized ellipticity χ calculated in the experiment. It is found that the trend of evolution is basically the same as the simulation. The only difference is that χ is significantly higher at room temperature. It may be caused by measurement or sample processing.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Normalized ellipticity χ in simulation (a) and experiment (b).

Download Full Size | PDF

3.2 Physical mechanism

In order to better understand the physical mechanism of the polarization conversion process in the metasurface, we extract the surface current distribution on the microstructure to reveal the linear polarization conversion effect and its temperature-controlled modulation process. Vertical magnetic fields are generated by the currents in the metasurface according to Ampere's law. Our simulation reveals two surface current distributions, namely the electric and magnetic dipoles) (see Fig. 4). The electric dipole mode is controlled by the current in one direction (at a certain moment). It radiates, generates the orthogonal component, and leads to effective linear polarization conversion, thereby generating a field orthogonal to the incident y-linear polarization. In contrast, the magnetic dipole mode is dominated by antisymmetric charge oscillations in the SRRs, which results in a magnetic moment perpendicular to the metasurface. The magnetic dipole mode traps energy on the metasurface, and this energy is eventually dissipated, causing absorption instead of polarization conversion. At resonance, the y-linear polarization incidence on the substrate side of the metasurface excites the magnetic dipole mode [Fig. 4(b)] which does not induce the polarization conversion effect at low VO2 conductivity (σlow = 10 S/m). However, when increasing the conductivity of VO2 (σhigh = 2.6×105 S/m), the insulator-to-metal phase change of VO2 causes the gold SRRs opening O1 to be connected, and excite the electric dipole mode, which can be indicated by the symmetric current distributions as shown in Fig. 4(e), thereby greatly enhancing the polarization conversion effect. Moreover, the proposed metasurface at frequencies of 0.6 and 1.1 THz both excites electric dipole modes and exhibits good polarization conversion effects whether VO2 is in an insulating or metallic state [see Figs. 4(a), 4(c), 4(d), and 4(f)].

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Physical mechanism of linear polarization conversion in multi-layer metasurface. Modes and surface currents (black arrow) excited on the gold SRRs layer by normally incident y-linear polarization wave at 0.6 THz (a) and (d), 0.85 THz (b) and (e), 1.1 THz (c) and (f) when VO2 is in insulator (σVO2 = 10 S/m) and metal phase (σVO2= 2.6 × 105 S/m).

Download Full Size | PDF

We used the principle of current resonance to explain the mechanism of polarization conversion of the gold SRRs, and then investigated the electromagnetic response of the structure composed of only the sapphire substrate, VO2 and gold SRRs (see Fig. 5). At low VO2 conductivity, the polarization conversion effect is obviously produced in the ranges of 0.45∼0.77 THz and 0.97∼1.2 THz. As the VO2 conductivity increases, the valley near 0.85 THz gradually turns into a peak and becomes flat with the peaks on both sides to form an ultra-wide band. However, the gold SRRs only obviously has a very low PCR. Therefore, we introduce a grating structure along the y-axis to reduce the co-polarization transmission |Tyy| to improve the PCRxy.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Unit structure and transmission amplitude in simulation (a) Unit structure composed of sapphire, VO2 and gold SRRs. Transmission amplitudes in simulation under VO2 conductivity of 10 S/m (b) and 2.6 × 105 S/m (c).

Download Full Size | PDF

3.3 Discussion

As we have shown in Figs. 2 and 4, at room temperature (σlow = 10 S/m), resonant magnetic dipole mode is excited around 0.85 THz, exhibiting a resonance valley in the cross-polarization spectrum. When VO2 is heated to 363 K (σhigh = 2.6×105 S/m), the heating-induced dielectric-to-metal phase transition of VO2 short-circuits the opening O1 in the gold SRRs. The observed behavior corresponds to a thermally switchable polarization convertor exhibiting different polarization conversion bandwidths. Here, we also investigate the influence of the different included angle C1 between the opening O1 in the gold SRRs and the x-axis on the electromagnetic response. As shown in Fig. 6, it can be clearly observed that as the included angle increases from 0 to 45°, the position of the valley has a blue shift, which shows that the included angle C1 determines the valley position. But as C1 increases from 45° to 90°, a red shift occurs. These two processes show a symmetrical change of the valleys. From this change, we can infer that the position of C1 in the gold SRRs may be shifted during the processing of the sample, leading to a blue shift of the spectrum in the experiment.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Transmission amplitudes for different C1 when the angle between the split line of O1 and the x-axis in the gold SRRs is 0° (a) and (e), 15° (b) and (f), 30° (c) and (g), and 45° (d) and (h).

Download Full Size | PDF

In the designed metasurface, the gold grating mainly inhibits the co-polarization components, and therefore enhances the polarization conversion. Due to the sub-wavelength size of the unit structure, the transmittance of different grating gap ratios for cross-polarization should be basically the same. To verify this conjecture, we numerically studied the effect of the grating gap ratio on the transmission spectrum. As shown in Fig. 7, in the structural changes with the grating gap ratios of 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1, the transmission spectra are nearly unchanged, indicating that the spacing between the grating does not affect the structural response. Therefore, the grating has good robustness and also provides favorable conditions for sample processing and multilayer alignment.

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. Transmission amplitudes when the grating gap ratio is 1:2 (a) and (d), 1:1 (b) and (e), and 2:1 (c) and (f).

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

We show a THz polarization conversion metasurface with dynamic control function. The metasurface device is composed of multilayer junctions, including a sapphire substrate, VO2 and gold SRRs, a polyimide dielectric layer, and a grating. This design uses the principle of current resonance to produce an efficient polarization conversion effect, and then uses the phase change property of VO2 to achieve the dynamic control function of the polarization conversion device. The metasurface-based polarization converter can realize the dynamic control function from dual broadband (0.45∼0.77 THz and 0.97∼1.2 THz) to ultra-wideband (0.38∼1.2 THz) operation with a high polarization conversion ratio (above 95%). By changing the opening position of the gold SRRs, the position of the resonance valley can be easily tuned, which makes the metasurface structure more flexible; the grating gap has almost no effect on the structure response, so the metasurface has good robustness, which provides favorable conditions for sample processing and alignment. The proposed active polarization converter is expected to be applied in technical fields such as integrated terahertz systems, imaging, and communications, thus enriching THz functional devices.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0701004); National Natural Science Foundation of China (11874245, 61605143, 61735012, 61775159, 61805129, 61875150, 62005193); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M680877, 2020TQ0224); Applied Basic Research Project of Shanxi Province, China (201801D221161).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0701004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61775159, 61735012, 61875150, 61805129, 62005193, 61605143, and 11874245), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 2020TQ0224 and 2020M680877), and Applied Basic Research Project of Shanxi Province (Grant No. 201801D221161).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. B. Ferguson and X.-C. Zhang, “Materials for terahertz science and technology,” Nat. Mater. 1, 26–33 (2002). [CrossRef]  

2. M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics 1, 97–105 (2007). [CrossRef]  

3. T. Nagatsuma, G. Ducournau, and C. C. Renaud, “Advances in terahertz communications accelerated by photonics,” Nat. Photonics 10, 371–379 (2016). [CrossRef]  

4. X. Chen, Z. Tian, J. Wang, Y. Yuan, X. Zhang, C. Ouyang, J. Gu, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Hysteretic behavior in ion gel-graphene hybrid terahertz modulator,” Carbon 155, 514–520 (2019). [CrossRef]  

5. L. Gingras, A. Jaber, A. Maleki, O. Reshef, K. Dolgaleva, R. W. Boyd, and J.-M. Ménard, “Ultrafast modulation of the spectral filtering properties of a THz metasurface,” Opt. Express 28, 20296–20304 (2020). [CrossRef]  

6. Q. Yang, X. Chen, Y. Li, X. Zhang, Y. Xu, Z. Tian, C. Ouyang, J. Gu, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Aperiodic-metamaterial-based absorber,” APL Mater. 5, 096107 (2017). [CrossRef]  

7. F. Hu, Y. Li, X. Xu, Y. Zhou, Y. Chen, P. Zhu, S. Zhao, W. Jiang, W. Zhang, J. Han, and Y. Chen, “Broadband large-modulation-depth low-current-triggered terahertz intensity modulator based on VO2 embedded hybrid metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Express 11, 092004 (2018). [CrossRef]  

8. H. Zhang, X. Zhang, Q. Xu, C. Tian, Q. Wang, Y. Xu, Y. Li, J. Gu, Z. Tian, C. Ouyang, X. Zhang, C. Hu, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “High-efficiency dielectric metasurfaces for polarization-dependent terahertz wavefront manipulation,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6, 1700773 (2018). [CrossRef]  

9. X. Zhang, Z. Tian, W. Yue, J. Gu, S. Zhang, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Broadband terahertz wave deflection based on C-shape complex metamaterials with phase discontinuities,” Adv. Mater. 25, 4567–4572 (2013). [CrossRef]  

10. L. Cong, N. Xu, J. Gu, R. Singh, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Highly flexible broadband terahertz metamaterial quarter-wave plate,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8, 626–632 (2014). [CrossRef]  

11. L. Cong, N. Xu, W. Zhang, and R. Singh, “Polarization control in terahertz metasurfaces with the lowest order rotational Symmetry,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 3, 1176–1183 (2015). [CrossRef]  

12. N. K. Grady, J. E. Heyes, D. R. Chowdhury, Y. Zeng, M. T. Reiten, A. K. Azad, A. J. Taylor, D. A. R. Dalvit, and H.-T. Chen, “Terahertz metamaterials for linear polarization conversion and anomalous refraction,” Science 340, 1304–1307 (2013). [CrossRef]  

13. M. Neshat and N. P. Armitage, “Improved measurement of polarization state in terahertz polarization spectroscopy,” Opt. Lett. 37, 1811–1813 (2012). [CrossRef]  

14. M. Garcia, C. Edmiston, R. Marinov, A. Vail, and V. Gruev, “Bio-inspired color-polarization imager for real-time in situ imaging,” Optica 4, 1263–1271 (2017). [CrossRef]  

15. T. Grosjean, F. Baida, R. Adam, J. P. Guillet, L. Billot, P. Nouvel, J. Torres, A. Penarier, D. Charraut, and L. Chusseau, “Linear to radial polarization conversion in the THz domain using a passive system,” Opt. Express 16, 18895–18909 (2008). [CrossRef]  

16. A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Planar photonics with metasurfaces,” Science 339, 1232009 (2013). [CrossRef]  

17. N. Yu and F. Capasso, “Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,” Nat. Mater. 13, 139–150 (2014). [CrossRef]  

18. Y. Xu, H. Zhang, Q. Li, X. Zhang, Q. Xu, W. Zhang, C. Hu, X. Zhang, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Generation of terahertz vector beams using dielectric metasurfaces via spin-decoupled phase control,” Nanophotonics 9, 3393–3402 (2020). [CrossRef]  

19. D. Wang, Y. Gu, Y. Gong, C.-W. Qiu, and M. Hong, “An ultrathin terahertz quarter-wave plate using planar babinet-inverted metasurface,” Opt. Express 23, 11114–11122 (2015). [CrossRef]  

20. L. Cong, W. Cao, Z. Tian, J. Gu, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Manipulating polarization states of terahertz radiation using metamaterials,” New J. Phys. 14, 115013 (2012). [CrossRef]  

21. T. Lv, X. Chen, G. Dong, M. Liu, D. Liu, C. Ouyang, Z. Zhu, Y. Li, C. Guan, J. Han, W. Zhang, S. Zhang, and J. Shi, “Dual-band dichroic asymmetric transmission of linearly polarized waves in terahertz chiral metamaterial,” Nanophotonics 9, 3235–3242 (2020). [CrossRef]  

22. T. T. Lv, Y. X. Li, H. F. Ma, Z. Zhu, Z. P. Li, C. Y. Guan, J. H. Shi, H. Zhang, and T. J. Cui, “Hybrid metamaterial switching for manipulating chirality based on VO2 phase transition,” Sci. Rep. 6, 23186 (2016). [CrossRef]  

23. S.-T. Xu, F.-T. Hu, M. Chen, F. Fan, and S.-J. Chang, “Broadband terahertz polarization converter and asymmetric transmission based on coupled dielectric-metal grating,” Ann. Phys. 529, 1700151 (2017). [CrossRef]  

24. C.-C. Chang, Z. Zhao, D. Li, A. J. Taylor, S. Fan, and H.-T. Chen, “Broadband linear-to-circular polarization conversion enabled by birefringent off-resonance reflective metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 237401 (2019). [CrossRef]  

25. L. Cong, Y. K. Srivastava, H. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Han, and R. Singh, “All-optical active THz metasurfaces for ultrafast polarization switching and dynamic beam splitting,” Light: Sci. Appl. 7, 28 (2018). [CrossRef]  

26. Y.-W. Huang, H. W. H. Lee, R. Sokhoyan, R. A. Pala, K. Thyagarajan, S. Han, D. P. Tsai, and H. A. Atwater, “Gate-tunable conducting oxide metasurfaces,” Nano Lett. 16, 5319–5325 (2016). [CrossRef]  

27. R. Drevinskas, M. Beresna, J. Zhang, A. G. Kazanskii, and P. G. Kazansky, “Ultrafast laser-induced metasurfaces for geometric phase manipulation,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1600575 (2017). [CrossRef]  

28. Z. Miao, Q. Wu, L. Xin, Q. He, and Z. Lei, “Widely tunable terahertz phase modulation with gate-controlled graphene metasurfaces,” Physical Review X 5, 041027 (2015). [CrossRef]  

29. L. Cong, Y. K. Srivastava, A. Solanki, T. C. Sum, and R. Singh, “Perovskite as a platform for active flexible meta-photonic devices,” ACS Photonics 4, 1595–1601 (2017). [CrossRef]  

30. Q. Wang, E. T. F. Rogers, B. Gholipour, C.-M. Wang, G. Yuan, J. Teng, and N. I. Zheludev, “Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials,” Nat. Photonics 10, 60–65 (2016). [CrossRef]  

31. C. H. Chu, M. L. Tseng, J. Chen, P. C. Wu, Y. H. Chen, H. C. Wang, T. Y. Chen, W. T. Hsieh, H. J. Wu, and G. Sun, “Active dielectric metasurface based on phase-change medium (Laser Photonics Rev. 10(6)/2016),” Laser Photonics Rev. 10, 1063 (2016). [CrossRef]  

32. M. Ren, B. Jia, J. Y. Ou, E. Plum, J. Zhang, K. F. Macdonald, A. E. Nikolaenko, J. Xu, G. Min, and N. I. Zheludev, “Nanostructured plasmonic medium for terahertz bandwidth all-optical switching,” Adv. Mater. 23, 5540–5544 (2011). [CrossRef]  

33. I. V. Shadrivov, V. A. Fedotov, D. A. Powell, N. I. Zheludev, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Giant nonlinear optical activity in chiral metamaterials,” in Optoelectronic and Microelectronic Materials and Devices (IEEE, 2010), pp. 87–88.

34. N. M. Tayyab, H. J. Hyun, F. Mohd, L. Kye-Jeong, N. Do-Young, and J. Jae-Hyung, “Vanadium dioxide based frequency tunable metasurface filters for realizing reconfigurable terahertz optical phase and polarization control,” Opt. Express 26, 12922–12929 (2018). [CrossRef]  

35. J. Li, Y. Yang, J. Li, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, H. Zhao, F. Li, T. Tang, H. Dai, and J. Yao, “All-optical switchable vanadium dioxide integrated coding metasurfaces for wavefront and polarization manipulation of terahertz beams,” Adv. Theory Simul. 3, 1900183 (2020). [CrossRef]  

36. M. Liu, E. Plum, H. Li, S. Li, Q. Xu, X. Zhang, C. Zhang, C. Zou, B. Jin, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Temperature-controlled optical activity and negative refractive index,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2010249 (2021). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the metasurface structure and experimental system. (a) Unit cell, composed of sapphire substrate, VO2 and gold SRRs layers, polyimide dielectric layer and a gold grating, with geometrical parameters h = 2000 µm, P = 80 µm, d = 200 nm, t = 35 µm, d1 = 10 µm, and d2= 22 µm. (b) Vertical view of the unit cell. (c) Gold SRR with geometrical parameters O = 10°, O1 = 10°, C1= 30°, and C2= 45°. (d)-(f) Optical microscope images of the fabricated VO2 and gold SRRs, gold grating and their combined structure, respectively. (g) Sample characterization by THz-TDS.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Transmission amplitude and PCR for simulation and experiment. (a) Simulated frequency dependence of co- and cross-polarization amplitudes and PCR for y-linear polarization incidence with VO2 conductivity ranging from 10 S/m to 2.6 × 105 S/m. (b) Measured frequency dependence of co- and cross-polarization amplitudes and PCR for y-linear polarization incidence at temperatures ranging from 296 K to 363 K.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Normalized ellipticity χ in simulation (a) and experiment (b).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Physical mechanism of linear polarization conversion in multi-layer metasurface. Modes and surface currents (black arrow) excited on the gold SRRs layer by normally incident y-linear polarization wave at 0.6 THz (a) and (d), 0.85 THz (b) and (e), 1.1 THz (c) and (f) when VO2 is in insulator (σVO2 = 10 S/m) and metal phase (σVO2= 2.6 × 105 S/m).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Unit structure and transmission amplitude in simulation (a) Unit structure composed of sapphire, VO2 and gold SRRs. Transmission amplitudes in simulation under VO2 conductivity of 10 S/m (b) and 2.6 × 105 S/m (c).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Transmission amplitudes for different C1 when the angle between the split line of O1 and the x-axis in the gold SRRs is 0° (a) and (e), 15° (b) and (f), 30° (c) and (g), and 45° (d) and (h).
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Transmission amplitudes when the grating gap ratio is 1:2 (a) and (d), 1:1 (b) and (e), and 2:1 (c) and (f).

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

S 0 = | T y y | 2  +  | T x y | 2 , S 1 = | T y y | 2  -  | T x y | 2 , S 2 = 2 | T y y | | T x y | cos δ d i f f , S 3 = 2 | T y y | | T x y | sin δ d i f f ,
sin ( 2 χ ) = S 3 S 0 ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.