Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Manifestation of the anisotropic properties of the molecular J-aggregate shell in the optical spectra of plexcitonic nanoparticles

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

The theoretical studies of light absorption and scattering spectra of the plexcitonic two-layer triangular nanoprisms and three-layer nanospheres are reported. The optical properties of such metal-organic core–shell and core–double-shell nanostructures were previously explained within the framework of pure isotropic models for describing their outer excitonic shell. In this work, we show that the anisotropy of the excitonic shell permittivity can drastically affect the optical spectra of such hybrid nanostructures. This fact is confirmed by directly comparing our theory with some available experimental data, which cannot be treated using conventional isotropic shell models. We have analyzed the influence of the shell anisotropy on the optical spectra and proposed a type of hybrid nanostructure that seems the most convenient for experimental observation of the effects associated with the anisotropy of the excitonic shell. A strong dependence of the anisotropic properties of the J-aggregate shell on the material of the intermediate spacer layer is demonstrated. This allows proposing a new way to effectively control the optical properties of metal-organic nanostructures by selecting the spacer material. Our results extend the understanding of physical effects in optics of plexcitonic nanostructures to more complex systems with the anisotropic and multi-excitonic properties of their molecular aggregate shell.

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

The solution of a number of fundamental and applied problems of nanophotonics is closely related to the study of the optical properties of hybrid organic-inorganic nanostructures and materials. A promising approach to creating novel hybrid materials with unique optical properties is combining various plasmonic nanostructures as an inorganic component and complex molecular or excitonic supramolecular structures as an organic component of composite systems. Typical systems of this kind usually consist of single metallic nanoparticles (or their complexes and arrays) and ordered molecular structures, e.g., J-aggregates of organic dyes [19]. The optical properties of metallic nanoparticles have been intensively studied in many works [1014]. The effects of light interaction with such nanoparticles are explained in terms of localized surface plasmon resonances, responsible for great enhancing local electric fields near their surfaces and the light absorption and scattering cross sections. The optical properties of molecular J-aggregates are also well-known [1517] and can be successfully described within the framework of the Frenkel exciton model or its generalizations. J-aggregates possess a very narrow optical absorption band, resonance fluorescence with small Stokes shift, anomalously high oscillator strength, and great nonlinear optical susceptibility.

Over the past two decades, considerable efforts have been devoted to the experimental and theoretical investigations of the structure and optical properties of various two-layer nanoparticles of different sizes, shapes, and compositions, consisting of a metallic core (Ag, Au) and a cyanine dye J-aggregate outer shell. In most of these works, such hybrid particles of spherical [1827] and elongated (spheroids [2830], rods [3134]) shapes were studied. There are also several papers on two-layer metal-organic nanoplatelets (disks [3537], prisms [3841] and stars [42]). Further, these studies were supplemented by a series of works on the optical properties of three-layer nanostructures with a metallic core coated with a double organic shell consisting of an intermediate passive dielectric spacer and an outer layer of cyanine dye molecular J- or H-aggregates. Here it is worthwhile to mention some experimental and theoretical papers on the three-layer nanospheres [4348], nanorods [4951], nanodumbbells [52], and nanodisks [53]. The optical properties of such two-layer and three-layer metal-organic nanoparticles are primarily determined by the effects of the near-field electromagnetic coupling of Frenkel excitons in the J-aggregate outer organic shell with localized surface plasmons confined in the metallic core. Quite different regimes of plexcitonic coupling may occur depending on the size and shape of a hybrid nanoparticle and specific optical constants of its metallic and organic subsystems. These are weak, strong, and ultra-strong coupling regimes discussed in several review articles [5457] as well as one more coupling regime, which manifests itself in spectral-band replication in the optical spectra of individual plexcitonic nanoparticles [41] or the nanoparticle dimers [7,58].

Theoretical description of light absorption and scattering spectra and quantitative analysis of the plasmon-exciton coupling regimes in hybrid metal/J-aggregate and metal/spacer/J-aggregate nanostructures were carried out earlier in almost all cases within the framework of various isotropic models based on the quasistatic approximation or exact analytical and numerical methods, such as the generalized Mie theory, Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method, and some other numerical techniques. Within the framework of the isotropic models, the outer layer of the organic dye is usually considered as an isotropic medium with an effective local dielectric function of the resonance type. In many cases, electrodynamical approaches using the isotropic complex dielectric functions of a metallic core and a J-aggregate shell make it possible to reasonably describe the optical spectra of plexcitonic nanosystems and adequately interpret one or another regime of near-field electromagnetic coupling. Nevertheless, isotropic approaches have some limitations, and their use should be unjustified when the outer organic shell of the system has pronounced anisotropic dielectric properties.

At the same time, it is well known that structures of nanometric and micrometer sizes made of orientational molecules are generally anisotropic. A vivid example of the dyes capable of forming molecular J-aggregates with pronounced anisotropic dielectric properties is pseudoisocyanine dye (PIC: 1,1’-disulfopropyl-2,2’-cyanine triethylammonium salt). Various morphologies and formations of this and similar molecular aggregates have been the subject of intense studies for many years [5963]. In particular, linear dichroism of a spin-coated film dispersed with highly oriented J-aggregates of pseudoisocyanine bromide was investigated to clarify the molecular arrangement of the constituent molecules [60]. Anisotropic behavior of the absorption and fluorescence spectra of fibril-shaped J-aggregates of pseudoisocyanine dyes in thin-film matrices of polyvinyl sulfate was observed in [61]. Experimental results for oriented J-aggregates of PIC dye demonstrated an essential difference in absorption spectra obtained for polarizations parallel and perpendicular to the J-aggregate orientation axis. Considerable interest in elucidating the role of the anisotropic dielectric properties of the PIC J-aggregate in the formation of the optical properties of hybrid nanosystems is due to the use as an external organic layer in studies of the effects of plexcitonic coupling in metal-organic nanoparticles of various sizes and shapes including concentric spheres [21,24,43,44] and triangular prisms [3941].

Studies of the effects of anisotropy in the diffraction, absorption, and scattering of light by diverse nanoparticles have been actively carried out for many years. This is due to the important role of these effects in some technological and biological applications [64]. The orientational effects in dipole-dipole interactions between neighboring dye molecules were recently considered using the coupled-dipole model in a spherical shell geometry [65]. A theoretical analysis performed in [65] was carried out along with the study of the influence of the dye molecule concentration in the shell and the investigation of the role of uniformity in its coverage. A thin-shell approximation of the Mie scattering problem for a spherical core–shell and core–double-shell structures with radial anisotropy in the external layer was proposed in [66,67]. Such approximation describes some of the orientational and anisotropic effects arising from the resonant dye-plasmon coupling. In addition, the authors of papers [68,69] have developed a model for the evaluation of effective dielectric function for an anisotropic layer of polarizable molecules adsorbed on a metallic surface and for the description of the electromagnetic core-shell interaction in such systems.

Despite this progress, to authors’ knowledge, there are no works devoted to the theoretical analysis of the effect of the excitonic shell anisotropy of hybrid metal/J-aggregate and metal/spacer/J-aggregate nanoparticles on their optical properties. The main goal of this work is to elucidate the role of the orientational effects in the molecular arrangements of J-aggregated excitonic shell in the formation of the optical spectra of some plexcitonic core-shell and core–double-shell nanoparticles of various sizes, shapes, and compositions. To this end, we use an approach, which allows us to include the anisotropic dielectric function of a J-aggregate subsystem into the theoretical consideration. The approach takes into account the tensorial nature of the dielectric function of a J-aggregate shell with normal and tangential components.

This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we present our theoretical approach and discuss the calculation details, including describing the isotropic local dielectric function of a metallic core and the anisotropic dielectric function of an organic shell. Section 3 is devoted to discussing our results of calculations obtained for the cases of isolated plexcitonic nanospheres and nanoprisms. Particular attention is paid here to comparing the theory with the available experimental data. Finally, in Sec. 4, we give main conclusions of our work.

2. Theoretical approach

The optical spectra of plexcitonic two-layer and three-layer nanoparticles were described in this work using two theoretical methods. We employ the Mie theory extended to the case of multilayer concentric spheres with anisotropic optical properties for spherical nanoparticles. The generalization for a multilayer sphere was made in several works (see, e.g. [70]. To include into consideration the effects of radial anisotropy of the outer organic shell, we use the formulas of the extended Mie theory presented in [64]. For metal-organic nanoparticles of complex shapes (e.g., triangular prisms), our calculations of the extinction cross sections are based on the FDTD method implemented in a freely available software package MIT Electromagnetic Equation Propagation (MEEP). The final results are presented for orientationally averaged cross sections corresponding to the naturally polarized light incident onto the nanoparticles randomly oriented in colloidal solutions or matrices. If the nanostructures are placed on glass, we employ an effective host medium approximation to simulate the effect of the substrate [58,71]. The value of host medium permittivity, $\varepsilon _{\text {h}}$, used for this case is 1.65. The approach allows us to calculate the cross sections for nanoparticles of arbitrary shapes and dimensions, including contributions from all electric and magnetic multipoles.

Throughout this work, we describe the nanoparticle metallic core by a local and isotropic frequency-dependent dielectric function, $\varepsilon _{\text {m}}(\omega )$. Such an approach is justified since we do not consider here the case of very small nanoparticle sizes, where the effects of spatial dispersion are manifested [72]. The choice of a specific way of describing the dielectric function, $\varepsilon _{\text {m}}(\omega )$, was done similar to our previous works with the account of both contributions from the intraband and interband transitions, $\varepsilon _{\text {m}} \left (\omega \right ) = \varepsilon _{\text {intra}} \left (\omega \right ) + \varepsilon _{\text {inter}} \left (\omega \right )$, and size effect of Kreibig [10], associated with scattering of free electrons from an interface between a metallic core and an organic layer.

We note that in all known calculations of the optical properties of hybrid metal/J-aggregate nanoparticles, carried out within the framework of a single exciton purely isotropic models, the frequency-dependent dielectric function of molecular J-aggregates was taken in the scalar form

$$\varepsilon _{\text{J}}(\omega)=\varepsilon^{\infty}_{\text{J}}+\frac{f_{\text{J}} \omega_{\text{J}}^2}{\omega _{\text{J}}^{2}-\omega ^{2}-i\omega {\gamma_{\text{J}}}}.$$

Here $\omega _{\text {J}}$ are the central frequency of the J-band; $\gamma _{\text {J}}$ is its full width; $f_{\text {J}}$ is the reduced oscillator strength; and $\varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\text {J}}$ is the permittivity outside the J-band.

In order to include the anisotropic and orientational effects of the outer J-aggregate shell in the theoretical description of the optical properties of hybrid metal/J-aggregate and metal/spacer/J-aggregate nanoparticles, its local frequency-dependent dielectric function should be significantly modified compared to simplified expression (1). In this case, it is necessary to represent it in tensor form and take into account the more complex nature of the J-band, in particular, the presence of several resonance peaks. Accordingly, we assume axial symmetry of the optical properties of the molecular J-aggregate and describe the components of the dielectric function tensor of the organic shell as the sum of the Lorentzians

$$\varepsilon_{({\parallel},\perp)}\left( \omega \right) =\varepsilon^{\infty}_{({\parallel},\perp)} +\sum\limits_{n}\frac{f^{({\parallel},\perp)}_{n}(\omega^{({\parallel},\perp)}_{n})^{2}}{(\omega^{({\parallel}, \perp)}_{n})^{2}-\omega^{2}-i\omega \gamma^{({\parallel}, \perp)}_{n}}.$$

Here $\varepsilon _{\parallel }$ and $\varepsilon _{\perp }$ are the tensor components associated with the direction parallel to the aggregate orientation axis (longitudinal component) and perpendicular to it (transverse component), respectively. Parameters in equation (2) are fitted from the measured absorption spectra.

The fitting procedure is as follows. The first term in the right-hand side of equation (2) is assumed to be the same for $\varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\parallel }$, and $\varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\perp }$, components of the J-aggregate permittivity tensor. This value is taken from the experimental data. The absorption spectra are simulated using the well-known formula for the dielectric constant of mixtures [73]. Since the dielectric function is a sum of a constant value and a set of the partially overlapping complex Lorentzians, the procedure determines the frequencies, $\omega ^{(\parallel, \perp )}_{n}$, and widths, $\gamma ^{(\parallel, \perp )}_{n}$, of spectral bands as well as the reduced oscillator strengths, $f^{(\parallel,\perp )}_{n}$, by fitting the shape of the spectra regardless of the absolute values of absorption. If the absorption spectra are measured separately for the light polarization parallel and perpendicular to the aggregate orientation axis, the fitting is performed separately for the parameters of $\varepsilon _{\parallel }$ and $\varepsilon _{\perp }$. A more complicated approach is used when the absorption spectra are measured for naturally polarized light or randomly oriented aggregates in a sample. In this case, we consider that some absorption bands are attributed to the longitudinal component and the rest to the transverse component of the J-aggregate permittivity tensor. The absorption spectra, $\sigma _{\parallel }$, and $\sigma _{\perp }$, are computed separately for light polarization parallel and perpendicular to the aggregate axis, respectively. Since axial symmetry of the optical properties of the molecular J-aggregate is assumed, two orthogonal polarization directions are perpendicular to the aggregate axis, and only one polarization direction is parallel to this axis. Thus, the resulting absorption spectrum is obtained as an equiprobable averaging over the orientations: $\left \langle \sigma \right \rangle = \sigma _{\parallel }/3 + 2\sigma _{\perp }/3$.

In order to explain the available experimental data most completely and correctly, we consider the following cases of molecular arrangements in the J-aggregate shell: (I) Normal aggregate orientation, when the direction of $\varepsilon _{\parallel }$ component is parallel to the normal direction to a nanoparticle surface; (II) Tangential aggregate orientation, in which the direction of $\varepsilon _{\parallel }$ component is perpendicular to the normal direction, and we assume the equiprobable orientation of the aggregate axis along the tangential plane of a nanoparticle; (III) Equiprobable orientation of the aggregate axis in space. In these three cases, the dielectric functions are described by tensors. The corresponding expressions are obtained by performing a proper averaging over possible directions of the J-aggregate axis. With tensor oriented along the $\mathbf {e}_{x}$, $\mathbf {e}_{y}$ and $\mathbf {e}_{z}$ axes (see Fig. 1.) the resulting expressions take the form

\begin{align}\widehat{\varepsilon }_{\text{norm}}&=\left( \begin{array}{ccc} \varepsilon _{\bot } & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \varepsilon _{\bot } & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \varepsilon _{\Vert } \end{array} \right) ,\text{\ \ }\widehat{\varepsilon }_{\text{tang}}=\left( \begin{array}{ccc} \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon _{\Vert }+\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon _{\bot } & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon _{\Vert }+\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon _{\bot } & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \varepsilon _{\bot } \end{array} \right) ,\nonumber\\\widehat{\varepsilon }_{\text{epo}}&=\left( \begin{array}{ccc} \frac{1}{3}\varepsilon _{\Vert }+\frac{2}{3}\varepsilon _{\bot } & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{1}{3}\varepsilon _{\Vert }+\frac{2}{3}\varepsilon _{\bot } & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{3}\varepsilon _{\Vert }+\frac{2}{3}\varepsilon _{\bot } \end{array} \right).\end{align}

In addition, for comparison of our results with those obtained on the basis of standard theoretical models, we consider one more case (IV) that corresponds to purely isotropic J-aggregate shell, described by scalar expression (1) for single excitonic peak, or its direct generalization,

$$\varepsilon_\text{iso}\left( \omega \right) =\varepsilon^{\infty}_{\text{J}} +\sum\limits_{n}\frac{f_{n}^{(\text{iso})}\omega_{n}^{2}}{\omega_{n}^{2}-\omega^{2}-i\omega \gamma_{n}.}$$
taking into account the multiple absorption bands of some molecular aggregates.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic view of a hybrid metal-organic nanostructures under study. Figs. 1(a) show a three-layer nanoparticle and Figs. 1(b) a two-layer nanoprism. The vectors $\textbf {e}_X$, $\textbf {e}_Y$ and $\textbf {e}_Z$ show the basis for the permittivity tensor of the shell material: $\textbf {e}_Z$ is directed normal to the surface, while $\textbf {e}_X$ and $\textbf {e}_Y$ lie in the tangential plane.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Results and discussions

We begin our consideration of the main features in optical spectra of hybrid metal-organic nanostructures associated with the anisotropic properties of their J-aggregate shell with a theoretical interpretation of available experimental data [21] on light scattering spectra by a three-layer, Au/MUA/PIC, nanoparticles (see Fig. 2). Such a plexcitonic system consists of a spherical gold core, an optically passive self-assembled MUA monolayer, and a J-aggregated outer shell of 1,1‘-diethyl-2,2‘-cyanine (PIC) dye. The anisotropic optical properties of PIC J-aggregate were studied in [5963]. For such oriented J-aggregates, a significant difference was demonstrated in the absorption spectra obtained for parallel and perpendicular polarization of light relative to the aggregate orientation axis (see red and black curves in bottom panels of Fig. 2(g)). To use these experimental data in our theoretical studies, we employ the basic tensor expressions (2) with the parameters fitted from the absorption spectra measured in [60]. The fitting procedure is described in Sec. 2. Following [21] we assume $\varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\parallel } = \varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\perp } = 2.9$. Remaining parameters are listed in Table 1.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Light scattering spectra of spherical three-layer Au/MUA/PIC nanoparticles. Figures 2(a), 2(c), and 2(e) in left column show comparisons of our theoretical results with experimental data [21]. Figures 2(b), 2(d), and 2(f) in right column show the scattering cross sections calculated for three cases (I) – (III) of molecular arangement in the J-aggregate shell described in Sec. 2. The Figures in the top three rows correspond to different diameters of a golden core, $D = 2R$ (see Fig. 1): $D=80$ nm for 2(a) – 2(b), $D=100$ nm for 2(c) – 2(d), and $D=130$ nm for 2(e) – 2(f). Curves to show the scattering spectra: Grey curves (A) and black curves (B) are experimental data [21] and the results of our calculations for two-layer, Au/MUA, nanoparticles, respectively. Green curves (C) and red curves (D) are experimental data [21] and our theoretical results for three-layer Au/MUA/PIC nanoparticles, calculated for normal J-aggregate orientation. Cyan curves (E) show the results calculated using standard scalar J-aggregate dielectric function (1) with the parameters taken form [21]. Curves to show the scattering cross sections: black curves (F) – no outer shell; red curves (G) – normal J-aggregate orientation; blue curves (H) – tangential orientation; green dashed curves (I) – equiprobable orientation of the aggregate in space. The Fig. 2(g) shows the absorption spectra [60] with parallel (dashed red curve) and perpendicular (solid black curve) polarization of incident light relative to the PIC-dye J-aggregate axis.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 1. Parameters of tensor dielectric function of PIC dye J-aggregate.

Figures 2(a), 2(c), and 2(e) (left column) present the results of our calculations of light scattering spectra by Au/MUA/PIC nanoparticles for three different diameters of a gold core ($D = 80$ nm, 100 nm, and 130 nm) and their comparison with experimental data [21]. In our calculations, the thickness of the MUA spacer layer is $s = 1.63$ nm for all core diameters. The thickness of the J-aggregate shell is assumed to be $d = 2$, 2.3, and 2.7 nm for the particles with core diameters 80 nm, 100 nm, and 130 nm, respectively (see Fig. 1). The permittivities of MUA and host solution are $\varepsilon _{\text {MUA}} = 2.1$, and $\varepsilon _{\text {h}} = 1.96$, respectively. The theoretical curves in these figures have been obtained using the anisotropic Mie theory for case (I) of normal J-aggregate orientation. In addition, in Figs. 2(b), 2(d), and 2(f) (right column), we demonstrate a comparison of the scattering cross sections, $\sigma _{\text {scat}}$, of light from the same nanoparticles, Au/MUA/PIC, calculated for the normal (I), tangential (II) and equiprobable (III) orientations of the outer J-aggregate shell of PIC-dye relative to the surface of a gold core covered with MUA spacer layer. As is evident from the figures, the shapes of curves for these three cases turn out to be quite different, and only case (I) of normal J-aggregate orientation agrees well with the experimental data [21]. These differences in the shape of the theoretical curves are, in fact, a consequence of radical differences in character and shapes of the absorption spectra obtained for parallel and perpendicular polarization of PIC-dye J-aggregate axis (see red and black curves in the bottom of Fig. 2(g)). Here it is important to stress that if the scattering spectra were calculated without taking into account the anisotropic properties of the J-aggregate, the narrow resonance peak in permittivity, $\varepsilon _{\parallel }$, would appear as a specific narrow dip in the scattering spectra, as directly shown by curves E in Figs. 2(a), 2(c) and 2(d). It is worth mentioning that the results of our calculations for spectra of two-layer Au/MUA nanoparticles well agree with the theoretical curves of Ref. [21]. Some divergence between the theoretical results and the experimental data in Fig. 2(e) is related to the divergence in theoretical and experimental curves for spectra of Au/MUA nanoparticles with a core diameter of 130 nm observed in Ref. [21]. However, the drastic difference in shapes of curves D and E in Fig. 2(e) demonstrates the importance of the aggregate orientation effect.

Next, we calculate the light absorption spectra of metal-organic three-layer nanoparticles, Au/TMA/PIC. This system is experimentally studied in [43]. It differs essentially from the example considered above by the material of the spacer layer, which is TMA: N,N,N-trimethyl(11-mercaptoundecyl) ammonium chloride. Another difference is an order of magnitude smaller size of the particle core. In our calculations, we use the following parameters: for the average particle diameter of Au/TMA, $a = 9.1$ nm, we take $D = 2R = 7.1$ nm, $s = 1.0$ nm, and $d = 1.0$ nm; while for the average particle diameter, $a = 15.2$ nm, we take $D = 2R = 12.4$ nm, $s = 1.4$ nm, and $d = 1.2$ nm (see Fig. 1.). The permittivities of TMA and host solution are $\varepsilon _{\text {TMA}} = 2.4$, and $\varepsilon _{h} = 1.78$, respectively. The results for Au/TMA/PIC are shown in Fig. 3. Similar to Fig. 2 panels in the left column of Fig. 3 present a comparison of our theoretical results with experimental data from Supporting Information of [43]. The panels in the right column demonstrate the behavior of the absorption cross sections calculated for three different cases (I–III) of the molecular J-aggregate orientation in the outer shell of the composite nanoparticle.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Spectra of light absorption by Au/TMA/PIC nanoparticles. Figures 3(a) and 3(c) (left column) show a comparison of our theoretical results with experimental data from Supporting Information of [43]. Figures 3(b) and 3(d) (right column) show the absorption cross sections calculated for three cases (I) – (III) of molecular arrangement in the J-aggregate shell. The results are presented for the average diameters of Au/TMA particles $a = 9.1$ nm (Figs. 3(a) – 3(b)), and $a = 15.2$ nm (Figs. 3(c) – 3(d)), as estimated in [43]. In Figs. 3(a) and 3(c) (left column): Grey curves (A) and black curves (B) are experimental data and the results of our calculations for Au/TMA, respectively. Green curves (C) and blue curves (D) are experimental data and our theoretical results for Au/TMA/PIC, calculated for tangential J-aggregate orientation. Notations of curves in Figs. 3(b) and 3(d) (right column) are same as in Figs. 2(b), 2(d), and 2(f).

Download Full Size | PDF

For Au/TMA/PIC nanoparticles, the agreement with the experimental data is obtained for the case of tangential J-aggregate orientation in the organic shell. Whereas, for Au/MUA/PIC, normal J-aggregate orientation yields better agreement. The difference in aggregate orientation of the organic shell can be explained by a significant difference between the chemical properties of MUA and TMA surfaces, on which the PIC J-aggregate is assembled. It is known that coating the Au or Ag nanoparticles with MUA and TMA produces the particles of opposite charge [74,75]. When the gold nanoparticle is coated with the TMA layer, the positively charged particle is formed, while the coating of the same particle with the MUA layer forms a negatively charged one. It was demonstrated [74] that such charging could cause electrostatic self-assembly of sphalerite (diamond-like) crystals, in which each nanoparticle has four oppositely charged neighbors. It was also shown [75] that the oppositely charged nanoparticles with the same metallic core but TMA or MUA coating could function as universal surfactants that control the growth and stability of microcrystals of charged organic molecules. Thus, our conclusion that the J-aggregate of a PIC dye has different arrangements in the outer shell, depending on the material of the spacer layer (TMA or MUA), agrees with concepts discussed in [74,75].

Analysis of Figs. 2 and 3 shows that the results calculated for tangential and equiprobable orientations are close to each other, while the results obtained for normal orientation are different. This observation can be explained by considering the form of permittivity tensors. Indeed, X- and Y- components of both $\widehat {\varepsilon }_{\text {tang}}$ and $\widehat {\varepsilon }_{\text {epo}}$ tensors contain terms, which mix the values of $\varepsilon _{\Vert }$ and $\varepsilon _{\bot }$ in different proportions. In turn, the $\widehat {\varepsilon }_{\text {epo}}$ tensor has the same values at all diagonal terms. Thus, the results obtained with this tensor are equivalent to those calculated with some effective scalar isotropic dielectric function (1). If the J-aggregate absorption spectra contain one dominant band, its oscillator strength can be adjusted to fit the main spectroscopic features of a hybrid system with tangentially oriented aggregates. This clearly explains why models with isotropic shells could be useful for treating a number of experimental data for spherical nanoparticles, except for some specific cases, like Au/MUA/PIC system [21].

The use of an anisotropic shell model allows us to treat the recent experimental data [76] on the optical properties of hybrid AgPR/TPP nanoplatelets consisting of silver nanoprisms with different aspect ratios coated with TPP dye (5,10,15,20-Tetraphenyl-21H,23H-porphyrin). The authors of work [76] developed a unique technique and fabricated the triangular silver nanoprisms with precisely tuned localized surface plasmon resonance wavelengths. This new technique has a significant advantage over some previous works on plasmonic and plexcitonic nanoprisms because of the relatively small dispersion in size of the produced nanoplatelets. This achievement allows studying the fine details in the plexcitonic spectra by avoiding inhomogeneous broadening. The TPP dye has four absorption peaks in the wavelength range of 500–700 nm so that the hybrid AgPR/TPP system exhibits multi-mode plasmon-exciton coupling.

We succeeded in the theoretical treatment of the complicated optical spectra of AgPR/TPP nanoplatelets by considering the separation of the absorption spectra of the TPP dye into a sum of two contributions from longitudinal and transverse permittivity components as shown in Fig. 4(a). The high absorption band around $\lambda =434$ nm is attributed to the transverse component of the dielectric tensor, $\varepsilon _{\perp }\left ( \omega \right )$, while the four smaller bands to the longitudinal component, $\varepsilon _{\parallel }\left ( \omega \right )$. The assumption that the transverse components of the dielectric tensor cause more intense absorption, then the longitudinal component agrees with the symmetric flat molecular structure of TPP, reported in [76]. We also consider the purely isotropic case with the scalar dielectric function of the TPP dye described by expression (4).

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Results of simulation of the experimental data [76]. Figure 4(a) shows the absorption spectra of TPP: Green curve (A) – experimental data [76]. Yellow dashed-dotted curve (B) – results of fitting with the isotropic expression (4). Red curves (C) – the contribution of the longitudinal component of the model anisotropic tensor, $\sigma _{\parallel }/3$. Blue dashed curve (D) – the contribution of the transverse component $2\sigma _{\perp }/3$. Black dotted curve (E) – resulting spectra $\left \langle \sigma \right \rangle$. Figures 4(b) – 4(d) show light extinction cross sections by hybrid Ag/TPP nanoprisms computed with anisotropic TPP shell model. The nanoprism sizes correspond to those denoted in [76] as AgPRs-500, AgPRs-540 and AgPRs-560, respectively. In each figure: Grey curves (A) and black curves (B) show scaled experimental and orientally averaged theoretical results for bare AgPRs, respectively. Results for immobilized hybrid AgPR/TPP: Green curves (C) – scaled experimental data. Red curves (D) – computed spectra for normal aggregate orientation. Blue dashed curves (E) – results obtained for tangential orientation. Yellow dashed-dotted curves (F) – results obtained for isotropic outer shell material. In each figure vertical grey dotted lines mark absorption wavelengths of TPP.

Download Full Size | PDF

We obtain the parameters of the tensor components in (2) and scalar (4) by fitting the TPP absorption spectra using the approach described in Sec. 2. The constants $\varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\parallel }$ and $\varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\perp }$ are taken to be 2.56 [76]. The rest values found are presented in Table 2. We note the direct correlation between the reduced oscillator strengths for the anisotropic and isotropic cases. The absorption bands for the longitudinal and transverse components do not overlap, except for the first longitudinal band. When the fitting is performed for the anisotropic case, the contribution of the longitudinal part is twice less than that for the transverse part. In the isotropic case, the ratio of these contributions turns out to be equal. Thus, the reduced oscillator strengths of the dominating absorption bands for the transverse component are equal for both fitting cases. The reduced oscillator strengths for the longitudinal bands, which do not overlap with any transverse band, are two times larger for the anisotropic case than for the isotropic one. The only exception is the first longitudinal band, which overlaps with the transverse absorption band.

Tables Icon

Table 2. Parameters of tensor dielectric function of TPP dye.

Figures 4(b) – 4(d) show a comparison of experimental data [76] with our calculations. The results are presented for the nanoprism sizes, denoted in [76] as AgPRs-500 (Fig. 4b), AgPRs-540 (Fig. 4(c)) and AgPRs-560 (Fig. 4(d)), for which strong plexcitonic coupling is achieved. The nanoprism sizes used in our calculations are as follows: for AgPRs-500 – $L = 22.5$ nm, for AgPRs-540 – $L = 27$ nm, and for AgPRs-560 – $L = 31$ nm (see Fig. 1(b)). Corner radii and Ag core thickness are same for all prisms, $r = 4$ nm and $h = 10$ nm, respectively. We considered nanoprisms immobilized on the glass surface so that the organic shell covered only the top and sides of a silver core (see Fig. 1(b)). The thickness of the TPP shell is $d = 7$ nm for all samples, which corresponds to the height of the scattered molecular aggregates measured in [76]. Thus, all the sizes used in our simulations agree with those reported in [76]. We also evaluated the extinction cross sections for the case of nanoprisms, which are uniformly covered with the organic shell on all sides with shell thickness $d = 4$ nm. The results obtained for this case are similar to those obtained for the configuration mimicking the experimental setup. To convert from arbitrary units to centimeters squared we multiply the experimental curves in Figs. 4(b) – 4(d) by factors: $3.2\cdot 10^{-11}$ cm$^{2}$, $5.2\cdot 10^{-11}$ cm$^{2}$ and $7.3\cdot 10^{-11}$ cm$^{2}$, respectively.

Considering the organic shell anisotropic properties, a much better agreement between the theoretical results and the experimental data is achieved. In particular, by assuming normal aggregate orientation, multiple peaks and dips are correctly reproduced in the range of 500–700 nm. Such agreement can not be achieved within the purely isotropic model of molecular aggregate shell because the ratios of the reduced oscillator strengths are fixed according to the data on the TPP absorption. Overestimation of the reduced oscillator strengths causes an increase in frequency difference between the intense left peak ($\sim 435$ nm) and the main broad absorption band at the longer wavelengths. Overestimation of the shell thickness causes a shift of the main absorption band towards the longer wavelengths because of the relatively high values of $\varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\parallel } = \varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\perp } = 2.56$ [76]. It is worth mentioning that the normal orientation of the molecular aggregate corresponds to the case when a dominating dipole moment component is parallel to the nanostructure surface. Assuming that a larger dipole component corresponds to larger aggregate dimensions, we can conclude that the molecular aggregate is flat, and the plane of the aggregate is laid flat on the surface. As is mentioned above, this hypothesis agrees with the molecular structure of TPP dye, reported in [76].

Below we study the main spectroscopic features caused by shell anisotropy. First, we consider a core-shell spherical nanoparticle with a silica core ($\varepsilon _{\text {c}} = 2.4$) and a J-aggregate shell with a single Lorentzian spectral band (1) in the longitudual component, $\varepsilon _{\parallel }$ and $\varepsilon _{\perp } = \varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\text {J}}$. We take the parameters of J-aggregate to be those of TDBC dye [35]: $\varepsilon ^{\infty }_{\text {J}}$ = 2.56, $\hbar \omega _{\text {J}}=2.11$ eV ($\lambda _{\text {J}}=587.6$ nm), $\gamma _{\text {J}}=0.03$ eV, and $f_{\text {J}}=0.41$. The host medium is taken to be water, $\varepsilon _{\text {h}} = 1.78$.

Figure 5(a) shows absorption spectra of such model nanoparticle for four cases (I)–(IV) of molecular arrangements in the J-aggregate shell described in Sec. 2. The particle core diameter is 100 nm, shell thickness is 2 nm. One can mention that absorption wavelengths differ substantially for normal and tangential orientations. In cases of equiprobable orientation and isotropic shell, spectra have two bands associated with both normal and tangential components. In the model under study, the permittivity tensors for cases of equiprobable orientation and isotropic shell differ only by values of reduced oscillator strengths (see (2)–(4)). For equiprobable orientation, this value is three times smaller than for the isotropic shell. Thus, a comparison of the curves for these cases shows that the value of the oscillator strength significantly affects the absorption wavelengths. This conclusion is confirmed by comparing absorption spectra evaluated for the same sizes and composition of nanoparticles, but for various values of J-aggregate oscillator strength, shown in Fig. 5(b). For normal aggregate orientation, the absorption wavelength depends linearly on the oscillator strength, while for tangential orientation, the wavelength remains close to the J-aggregate absorption wavelength. The results shown in Fig. 5(c) demonstrate that the thickness of the shell does not significantly affect the absorption wavelengths.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Absorption spectra by SiO$_{2}$/J-aggregate nanoparticle calculated for different J-aggregate orientations. Figure 5(a) – results for the parameters of the TDBC J-aggregate. Red curve (A) – normal aggregate orientation. Blue curve (B) – tangential orientation. Green dashed curve (C) – equiprobable orientation. Yellow dashed-dotted curve (D) – isotropic shell. Figure 5(b) – results for different oscillator strengths, $f_{\text {J}}$. Dashed curves are for normal and solid curves are for tangential orientations: $f_{\text {J}} = 0.1$ – dashed red (A) and solid orange (B) curves; $f_{\text {J}} = 0.2$ – dashed blue (C) and solid cyan (D) curves; $f_{\text {J}} = 0.4$ – dashed dark-green (E) and solid green (F) curves. Figure 5(c) – results for different shell thickness, $d$. Dashed curves are for normal and solid curves are for tangential orientations: $d = 1$ nm – dashed black (A) and solid grey (B) curves; $d = 2$ nm – dashed red (C) and solid orange (D) curves; $d = 4$ nm – dashed blue (E) and solid cyan (F) curves; $d = 8$ nm – dashed dark-green (G) and solid green (H) curves. Vertical grey dotted line marks the TDBC J-aggregate absorption wavelength, $\lambda _{\text {J}} =587.6$ nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

Analyzing Figs. 5 we conclude that the absorption spectra of a silica nanoparticle coated with a J-aggregate contain one or two narrow absorption bands depending on the molecular arrangements in the shell. A single excitonic absorption wavelength is observed only for normal and tangential aggregate orientation. The absorption wavelengths of this system strongly depend on the aggregate orientation and the reduced oscillator strength. Previously, we concluded that the J-aggregate arrangements in the shell of the three-layer structures strongly depend on the physico-chemical properties of the intermediate optically passive layer (spacer). This allows us to propose a three-layer plexcitonic nanoparticle, which consists of a dielectric or semiconductor core, a passive self-assembled layer, and a J-aggregated shell as the most convenient system for experimental study of the anisotropic effects of J-aggregate shell on the optical properties of a hybrid system. Such systems have two advantages. First, molecular arrangements in the organic shell could be controlled by changing the material of the spacer layer. Second, the molecular arrangement could be straightforwardly determined by measuring the absorption wavelengths.

Figure 6 shows absorption spectra of the two-layer system, which is similar to that studied above. The sizes and the shell material are the same, but the core material is gold instead of silica. Similar to Figs. 5(a) we present our results for four considered cases of molecular arrangements in the J-aggregate shell. As in the case of silica core, the spectral features specific for different J-aggregate orientations are also observed in the system with the golden core. However, as can be seen in Fig. 6(c) under certain conditions, the absorption band, associated with normal molecular aggregate orientation, could be strongly coupled with the core plasmon, causing the spectral dip formation instead of the peak. At the same time, the absorption band, associated with tangential orientation, remains weakly coupled with the core plasmon. The dependences of the absorption wavelength on the oscillator strength for normal and tangential orientations are similar to those observed for the system with silica core. When the orientation is tangential, the wavelength of spectral peak (or dip) is close to the J-aggregate absorption wavelength, while in the case of normal orientation, the associated peak (or dip) tends to shift towards shorter wavelengths with an increase of the oscillator strength. We note that this observation also could be used to identify the anisotropic shell effects in the optical spectra of hybrid nanoparticles.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Absorption spectra by Au/J-aggregate nanoparticle calculated for different orientations and oscillator strengths of the J-aggregate: Figure 6(a) – $f_{\text {J}} = 0.05$, Fig. 6(b) – $f_{\text {J}} = 0.15$, Fig. 6(c) – $f_{\text {J}} = 0.45$. Black curve (A) – no shell. Red curve (B) – normal aggregate orientation. Blue curve (C) – tangential orientation. Green curve (D) – equiprobable orientation. Yellow curve (E) – isotropic shell. The sizes of nanoparticles: $D = 2R = 100$ nm, $d = 2$ nm. Vertical grey dotted line marks the TDBC J-aggregate absorption wavelength, $\lambda _{\text {J}} =587.6$ nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusions

This work have, for the first time, demonstrated vivid manifestations of the effects of orientation and anisotropy of ordered molecular aggregates of the outer shell of hybrid plexcitonic nanostructures in their optical spectra. We have considered three specific examples by performing numerical calculations of the absorption and scattering spectra of three-layer nanospheres (Au/MUA/PIC and Au/TMA/PIC) and two-layer nanoprisms (Ag/TPP) and comparing their results with the available experimental data. It was shown that the shape of the optical spectra of plexcitonic nanoparticles turns out to be quite different for normal and tangential orientations of aggregated molecules in the dye shell relative to the nanoparticle surface. Moreover, only one aggregate orientation provides good agreement with the available experimental data in each case.

We have demonstrated that the molecular J-aggregate orientation of a hybrid nanoparticle drastically depends on the surface material of a spacer layer on which the J-aggregate is assembled. It was illustrated by comparing our calculations with the experimental data on the optical spectra of Au/MUA/PIC and Au/TMA/PIC nanospheres having quite different MUA and TMA spacer layers. The difference in aggregate orientation can be explained by significantly different chemical properties of MUA and TMA surfaces. This conclusion agrees with the current concepts in chemistry that the metallic nanoparticles coated with MUA and TMA form oppositely charged particles. Our results indicate that it is possible to effectively control the optical properties of hybrid nanostructures by correctly selecting the optically passive spacer layer.

We have proposed a type of hybrid nanostructures that seems most convenient for observing the anisotropic shell effect on its optical properties. They are three-layer plexcitonic nanoparticles consisting of a dielectric or a semiconducting core, an optically passive layer, and a J-aggregated outer shell. The spectrum of such a system contains narrow absorption bands, with wavelength peak positions strongly dependent on the aggregate orientation in a shell. Thus, the molecular arrangement in such systems can be directly determined by measuring the absorption wavelengths.

Studies of plexcitonic nanostructures similar to those carried out in this work will create a complete physical picture of the effects of light interaction with hybrid metal-organic nanosystems possessing anisotropic and multi-excitonic properties of their molecular aggregate shell. Moreover, such studies are promising for developing some photonic and optoelectronic devices of the next generation operating on the basis of the effects of near-field electromagnetic plexcitonic coupling.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation (19-79-30086).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge funding support listed above. The authors are grateful to A.A. Narits for the valuable discussions.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. G. P. Wiederrecht, G. A. Wurtz, and A. Bouhelier, “Ultrafast hybrid plasmonics,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 461(4-6), 171–179 (2008). [CrossRef]  

2. N. T. Fofang, T.-H. Park, O. Neumann, N. A. Mirin, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas, “Plexcitonic nanoparticles: Plasmon–exciton coupling in nanoshell–J-aggregate complexes,” Nano Lett. 8(10), 3481–3487 (2008). [CrossRef]  

3. V. Lebedev, A. Vitukhnovsky, A. Yoshida, N. Kometani, and Y. Yonezawa, “Absorption properties of the composite silver/dye nanoparticles in colloidal solutions,” Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 326(3), 204–209 (2008). [CrossRef]  

4. A. E. Schlather, N. Large, A. S. Urban, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas, “Near-field mediated plexcitonic coupling and giant Rabi splitting in individual metallic dimers,” Nano Lett. 13(7), 3281–3286 (2013). [CrossRef]  

5. F. Nan, S.-J. Ding, L. Ma, Z.-Q. Cheng, Y.-T. Zhong, Y.-F. Zhang, Y.-H. Qiu, X. Li, L. Zhou, and Q.-Q. Wang, “Plasmon resonance energy transfer and plexcitonic solar cell,” Nanoscale 8(32), 15071–15078 (2016). [CrossRef]  

6. F. Todisco, M. De Giorgi, M. Esposito, L. De Marco, A. Zizzari, M. Bianco, L. Dominici, D. Ballarini, V. Arima, G. Gigli, and D. Sanvitto, “Ultrastrong plasmon–exciton coupling by dynamic molecular aggregation,” ACS Photonics 5(1), 143–150 (2018). [CrossRef]  

7. A. D. Kondorskiy and V. S. Lebedev, “Effects of near-field electromagnetic coupling in dimers of nanoparticles with a silver core and a J-aggregate dye shell,” Quantum Electronics 48(11), 1035–1042 (2018). [CrossRef]  

8. V. Krivenkov, S. Goncharov, I. Nabiev, and Y. P. Rakovich, “Induced transparency in plasmon-exciton nanostructures for sensing applications,” Laser Photonics Rev. 13(1), 1800176 (2019). [CrossRef]  

9. M. Pelton, S. D. Storm, and H. Leng, “Strong coupling of emitters to single plasmonic nanoparticles: exciton-induced transparency and Rabi splitting,” Nanoscale 11(31), 14540–14552 (2019). [CrossRef]  

10. U. Kreibig and M. Vollmer, Optical Properties of Metal Clusters (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1995).

11. K. L. Kelly, E. Coronado, L. L. Zhao, and G. C. Schatz, “The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment,” J. Phys. Chem. B 107(3), 668–677 (2003). [CrossRef]  

12. N. J. Halas, S. Lal, W.-S. Chang, S. Link, and P. Nordlander, “Plasmons in strongly coupled metallic nanostructures,” Chem. Rev. 111(6), 3913–3961 (2011). [CrossRef]  

13. N. Harris, M. G. Blaber, and G. C. Schatz, “Optical properties of metal nanoparticles,” in Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology, B. Bhushan, ed. (Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2016), pp. 3027–3048.

14. A. D. Kondorskiy, N. T. Lam, and V. S. Lebedev, “Absorption and scattering of light by silver and gold nanodisks and nanoprisms,” J. Russ. Laser Res. 39(1), 56–66 (2018). [CrossRef]  

15. F. Würthner, T. E. Kaiser, and C. R. Saha-Möller, “J-aggregates: From serendipitous discovery to supramolecular engineering of functional dye materials,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50(15), 3376–3410 (2011). [CrossRef]  

16. J. L. Bricks, Y. L. Slominskii, I. D. Panas, and A. P. Demchenko, “Fluorescent J-aggregates of cyanine dyes: basic research and applications review,” Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 6(1), 012001 (2017). [CrossRef]  

17. B. I. Shapiro, A. D. Nekrasov, V. S. Krivobok, and V. S. Lebedev, “Optical properties of molecular nanocrystals consisting of J-aggregates of anionic and cationic cyanine dyes,” Opt. Express 26(23), 30324–30337 (2018). [CrossRef]  

18. N. Kometani, M. Tsubonishi, T. Fujita, K. Asami, and Y. Yonezawa, “Preparation and optical absorption spectra of dye-coated Au, Ag, and Au/Ag colloidal nanoparticles in aqueous solutions and in alternate assemblies,” Langmuir 17(3), 578–580 (2001). [CrossRef]  

19. G. A. Wurtz, J. Hranisavljevic, and G. P. Wiederrecht, “Photo-initiated energy transfer in nanostructured complexes observed by near-field optical microscopy,” J. Microsc. 210(3), 340–343 (2003). [CrossRef]  

20. G. P. Wiederrecht, G. A. Wurtz, and J. Hranisavljevic, “Coherent coupling of molecular excitons to electronic polarizations of noble metal nanoparticles,” Nano Lett. 4(11), 2121–2125 (2004). [CrossRef]  

21. T. Uwada, R. Toyota, H. Masuhara, and T. Asahi, “Single particle spectroscopic investigation on the interaction between exciton transition of cyanine dye J-aggregates and localized surface plasmon polarization of gold nanoparticles,” J. Phys. Chem. C 111(4), 1549–1552 (2007). [CrossRef]  

22. V. S. Lebedev, A. S. Medvedev, D. N. Vasil’ev, D. A. Chubich, and A. G. Vitukhnovsky, “Optical properties of noble-metal nanoparticles coated with a dye J-aggregate monolayer,” Quantum Electron. 40(3), 246–253 (2010). [CrossRef]  

23. D. Djoumessi Lekeufack, A. Brioude, A. W. Coleman, P. Miele, J. Bellessa, L. De Zeng, and P. Stadelmann, “Core-shell gold J-aggregate nanoparticles for highly efficient strong coupling applications,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(25), 253107 (2010). [CrossRef]  

24. V. S. Lebedev and A. S. Medvedev, “Plasmon — exciton coupling effects in light absorption and scattering by metal/J-aggregate bilayer nanoparticles,” Quantum Electron. 42(8), 701–713 (2012). [CrossRef]  

25. V. S. Lebedev and A. S. Medvedev, “Absorption and scattering of light by hybrid metal/J-aggregate nanoparticles: Plasmon–exciton coupling and size effects,” J. Russ. Laser Res. 34(4), 303–322 (2013). [CrossRef]  

26. A. Vujačić, V. Vasić, M. Dramićanin, S. P. Sovilj, N. Bibić, J. Hranisavljevic, and G. P. Wiederrecht, “Kinetics of J-aggregate formation on the surface of au nanoparticle colloids,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(7), 4655–4661 (2012). [CrossRef]  

27. T. J. Antosiewicz, S. P. Apell, and T. Shegai, “Plasmon–exciton interactions in a core–shell geometry: From enhanced absorption to strong coupling,” ACS Photonics 1(5), 454–463 (2014). [CrossRef]  

28. D. Gülen, “A numerical spectroscopic investigation on the functionality of molecular excitons in tuning the plasmonic splitting observed in core/shell hybrid nanostructures,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(32), 13825–13831 (2010). [CrossRef]  

29. H. Chen, L. Shao, K. C. Woo, J. Wang, and H.-Q. Lin, “Plasmonic–molecular resonance coupling: Plasmonic splitting versus energy transfer,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(26), 14088–14095 (2012). [CrossRef]  

30. G. Zengin, G. Johansson, P. Johansson, T. J. Antosiewicz, M. Käll, and T. Shegai, “Approaching the strong coupling limit in single plasmonic nanorods interacting with J-aggregates,” Sci. Rep. 3(1), 3074 (2013). [CrossRef]  

31. G. A. Wurtz, P. R. Evans, W. Hendren, R. Atkinson, W. Dickson, R. J. Pollard, A. V. Zayats, W. Harrison, and C. Bower, “Molecular plasmonics with tunable exciton–plasmon coupling strength in J-aggregate hybridized au nanorod assemblies,” Nano Lett. 7(5), 1297–1303 (2007). [CrossRef]  

32. W. Ni, T. Ambjörnsson, S. P. Apell, H. Chen, and J. Wang, “Observing plasmonic–molecular resonance coupling on single gold nanorods,” Nano Lett. 10(1), 77–84 (2010). [CrossRef]  

33. D. Melnikau, R. Esteban, D. Savateeva, A. Sánchez-Iglesias, M. Grzelczak, M. K. Schmidt, L. M. Liz-Marzán, J. Aizpurua, and Y. P. Rakovich, “Rabi splitting in photoluminescence spectra of hybrid systems of gold nanorods and J-aggregates,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7(2), 354–362 (2016). [CrossRef]  

34. R. Thomas, A. Thomas, S. Pullanchery, L. Joseph, S. M. Somasundaran, R. S. Swathi, S. K. Gray, and K. G. Thomas, “Plexcitons: The role of oscillator strengths and spectral widths in determining strong coupling,” ACS Nano 12(1), 402–415 (2018). [CrossRef]  

35. J. Bellessa, C. Symonds, K. Vynck, A. Lemaitre, A. Brioude, L. Beaur, J. C. Plenet, P. Viste, D. Felbacq, E. Cambril, and P. Valvin, “Giant Rabi splitting between localized mixed plasmon-exciton states in a two-dimensional array of nanosize metallic disks in an organic semiconductor,” Phys. Rev. B 80(3), 033303 (2009). [CrossRef]  

36. Y. B. Zheng, B. K. Juluri, L. Lin Jensen, D. Ahmed, M. Lu, L. Jensen, and T. J. Huang, “Dynamic tuning of plasmon-exciton coupling in arrays of nanodisk-J-aggregate complexes,” Adv. Mater. 22(32), 3603–3607 (2010). [CrossRef]  

37. F. M. Balci, S. Sarisozen, N. Polat, and S. Balci, “Colloidal nanodisk shaped plexcitonic nanoparticles with large Rabi splitting energies,” J. Phys. Chem. C 123(43), 26571–26576 (2019). [CrossRef]  

38. S. Balci, “Ultrastrong plasmon-exciton coupling in metal nanoprisms with J-aggregates,” Opt. Lett. 38(21), 4498–4501 (2013). [CrossRef]  

39. B. G. DeLacy, O. D. Miller, C. W. Hsu, Z. Zander, S. Lacey, R. Yagloski, A. W. Fountain, E. Valdes, E. Anquillare, M. Soljačić, S. G. Johnson, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Coherent plasmon-exciton coupling in silver platelet–J-aggregate nanocomposites,” Nano Lett. 15(4), 2588–2593 (2015). [CrossRef]  

40. K. Das, B. Hazra, and M. Chandra, “Exploring the coherent interaction in a hybrid system of hollow gold nanoprisms and cyanine dye J-aggregates: role of plasmon-hybridization mediated local electric-field enhancement,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19(41), 27997–28005 (2017). [CrossRef]  

41. N. T. Lam, A. D. Kondorskiy, and V. S. Lebedev, “Extinction spectra of bilayer organometallic nanoplatelets,” Bull. Lebedev Phys. Inst. 46(12), 390–394 (2019). [CrossRef]  

42. D. Melnikau, D. Savateeva, A. Susha, A. L. Rogach, and Y. P. Rakovich, “Strong plasmon-exciton coupling in a hybrid system of gold nanostars and J-aggregates,” Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8(1), 134 (2013). [CrossRef]  

43. A. Yoshida, Y. Yonezawa, and N. Kometani, “Tuning of the spectroscopic properties of composite nanoparticles by the insertion of a spacer layer: Effect of exciton–plasmon coupling,” Langmuir 25(12), 6683–6689 (2009). [CrossRef]  

44. A. Yoshida and N. Kometani, “Effect of the interaction between molecular exciton and localized surface plasmon on the spectroscopic properties of silver nanoparticles coated with cyanine dye J-aggregates,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(7), 2867–2872 (2010). [CrossRef]  

45. A. S. Medvedev and V. S. Lebedev, “Modeling of light absorption and scattering by metal nanoparticles coated with organic dye J-aggregate,” Bull. Lebedev Phys. Inst. 37(6), 177–179 (2010). [CrossRef]  

46. V. S. Lebedev and A. S. Medvedev, “Optical properties of three-layer metal-organic nanoparticles with a molecular J-aggregate shell,” Quantum Electron. 43(11), 1065–1077 (2013). [CrossRef]  

47. B. G. DeLacy, W. Qiu, M. Soljačić, C. W. Hsu, O. D. Miller, S. G. Johnson, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Layer-by-layer self-assembly of plexcitonic nanoparticles,” Opt. Express 21(16), 19103–19112 (2013). [CrossRef]  

48. B. B. Laban, V. Vodnik, and V. Vasić, “Spectrophotometric observations of thiacyanine dye J-aggregation on citrate capped silver nanoparticles,” Nanospectroscopy 1(1), 54–60 (2015). [CrossRef]  

49. A. Yoshida, N. Uchida, and N. Kometani, “Synthesis and spectroscopic studies of composite gold nanorods with a double-shell structure composed of spacer and cyanine dye J-aggregate layers,” Langmuir 25(19), 11802–11807 (2009). [CrossRef]  

50. B. I. Shapiro, L. S. Sokolova, V. A. Kuz’min, A. I. Tolmachev, Y. L. Slominskii, and Y. L. Briks, “Effect of meso-alkyl substituents in the polymethine chain of thiacarbocyanines on the morphology of dye aggregates,” Nanotechnol. in Russia 7(5-6), 205–212 (2012). [CrossRef]  

51. B. I. Shapiro, E. S. Tyshkunova, A. D. Kondorskiy, and V. S. Lebedev, “Light absorption and plasmon – exciton interaction in three-layer nanorods with a gold core and outer shell composed of molecular J- and H-aggregates of dyes,” Quantum Electronics 45(12), 1153–1160 (2015). [CrossRef]  

52. A. D. Kondorskiy, K. S. Kislov, N. T. Lam, and V. S. Lebedev, “Absorption of light by hybrid metalorganic nanostructures of elongated shape,” J. Rus. Laser Res. 36(2), 175–192 (2015). [CrossRef]  

53. F. Todisco, S. D’Agostino, M. Esposito, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, L. Dominici, I. Tarantini, M. Cuscuná, F. Della Sala, G. Gigli, and D. Sanvitto, “Exciton–plasmon coupling enhancement via metal oxidation,” ACS Nano 9(10), 9691–9699 (2015). [CrossRef]  

54. P. Törmä and W. L. Barnes, “Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 78(1), 013901 (2015). [CrossRef]  

55. M. Sukharev and A. Nitzan, “Optics of exciton-plasmon nanomaterials,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29(44), 443003 (2017). [CrossRef]  

56. E. Cao, W. Lin, M. Sun, W. Liang, and Y. Song, “Exciton-plasmon coupling interactions: from principle to applications,” Nanophotonics 7(1), 145–167 (2018). [CrossRef]  

57. A. P. Manuel, A. Kirkey, N. Mahdi, and K. Shankar, “Plexcitonics – fundamental principles and optoelectronic applications,” J. Mater. Chem. C 7(7), 1821–1853 (2019). [CrossRef]  

58. A. D. Kondorskiy and V. S. Lebedev, “Spectral-band replication phenomenon in a single pair of hybrid metal-organic nanospheres and nanodisks caused by plexcitonic coupling,” Opt. Express 27(8), 11783–11799 (2019). [CrossRef]  

59. P. Scherer and S. F. Fischer, “On the theory of vibronic structure of linear aggregates. application to pseudoisocyanin (PIC),” Chem. Phys. 86(3), 269–283 (1984). [CrossRef]  

60. K. Misawa, H. Ono, K. Minoshima, and T. Kobayashi, “New model of excitonic bands and molecular arrangement of highly oriented J-aggregates in polymer films prepared by a novel method,” J. Luminescence 60-61, 812–815 (1994). [CrossRef]  

61. T. Tani, M. Oda, T. Hayashi, H. Ohno, and K. Hirata, “Anisotropic observation of absorption and fluorescence transition dipoles in exciton-polariton properties of PIC J-aggregates,” J. Luminescence 122-123, 244–246 (2007). Luminescence and Optical Spectroscopy of Condensed Matter. [CrossRef]  

62. Y. Obara, K. Saitoh, M. Oda, and T. Tani, “Room-temperature fluorescence lifetime of pseudoisocyanine (PIC) J excitons with various aggregate morphologies in relation to microcavity polariton formation,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13(5), 5851–5865 (2012). [CrossRef]  

63. F. Haverkort, A. Stradomska, and J. Knoester, “First-principles simulations of the initial phase of self-aggregation of a cyanine dye: Structure and optical spectra,” J. Phys. Chem. B 118(29), 8877–8890 (2014). [CrossRef]  

64. C. Qiu, L. Gao, J. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljacic, “Light scattering from anisotropic particles: propagation, localization, and nonlinearity,” Laser Photonics Rev. 4(2), 268–282 (2009). [CrossRef]  

65. B. Auguié and E. C. Le Ru, “Optical absorption of dye molecules in a spherical shell geometry,” J. Phys. Chem. C 122(33), 19110–19115 (2018). [CrossRef]  

66. C. Tang, B. Auguié, and E. C. Le Ru, “Modeling molecular orientation effects in dye-coated nanostructures using a thin-shell approximation of Mie theory for radially anisotropic media,” ACS Photonics 5(12), 5002–5009 (2018). [CrossRef]  

67. C. Tang, B. Auguié, and E. C. Le Ru, “Thin-shell approximation of Mie theory for a thin anisotropic layer spaced away from a spherical core: Application to dye-coated nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. A 104(3), 033502 (2021). [CrossRef]  

68. B. Auguié, B. L. Darby, and E. C. Le Ru, “Electromagnetic interactions of dye molecules surrounding a nanosphere,” Nanoscale 11(25), 12177–12187 (2019). [CrossRef]  

69. C. Tang, B. Auguié, and E. C. Le Ru, “Refined effective-medium model for the optical properties of nanoparticles coated with anisotropic molecules,” Phys. Rev. B 103(8), 085436 (2021). [CrossRef]  

70. J. Sinzig and M. Quinten, “Scattering and absorption by spherical multilayer particles,” Appl. Phys. A 58(2), 157–162 (1994). [CrossRef]  

71. X. Niu, X. Hu, C. Lu, Y. Sheng, H. Yang, and Q. Gong, “Broadband dispersive free, large, and ultrafast nonlinear material platforms for photonics,” Nanophotonics 9(15), 4609–4618 (2020). [CrossRef]  

72. G. S. Agarwal and S. V. ONeil, “Effect of hydrodynamic dispersion of the metal on surface plasmons and surface-enhanced phenomena in spherical geometries,” Phys. Rev. B 28(2), 487–493 (1983). [CrossRef]  

73. J. A. Reynolds and J. M. Hough, “Formulae for dielectric constant of mixtures,” Proc. Phys. Soc. B 70(8), 769–775 (1957). [CrossRef]  

74. A. M. Kalsin, M. Fialkowski, M. Paszewski, S. K. Smoukov, K. J. M. Bishop, and B. A. Grzybowski, “Electrostatic self-assembly of binary nanoparticle crystals with a diamond-like lattice,” Science 312(5772), 420–424 (2006). [CrossRef]  

75. B. Kowalczyk, K. J. M. Bishop, I. Lagzi, D. Wang, Y. Wei, S. Han, and B. A. Grzybowski, “Charged nanoparticles as supramolecular surfactants for controlling the growth and stability of microcrystals,” Nat. Mater. 11(3), 227–232 (2012). [CrossRef]  

76. N. Takeshima, K. Sugawa, H. Tahara, S. Jin, M. Noguchi, Y. Hayakawa, Y. Yamakawa, and J. Otsuki, “Combined use of anisotropic silver nanoprisms with different aspect ratios for multi-mode plasmon-exciton coupling,” Nanoscale Res. Lett. 15(1), 15 (2020). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic view of a hybrid metal-organic nanostructures under study. Figs. 1(a) show a three-layer nanoparticle and Figs. 1(b) a two-layer nanoprism. The vectors $\textbf {e}_X$, $\textbf {e}_Y$ and $\textbf {e}_Z$ show the basis for the permittivity tensor of the shell material: $\textbf {e}_Z$ is directed normal to the surface, while $\textbf {e}_X$ and $\textbf {e}_Y$ lie in the tangential plane.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Light scattering spectra of spherical three-layer Au/MUA/PIC nanoparticles. Figures 2(a), 2(c), and 2(e) in left column show comparisons of our theoretical results with experimental data [21]. Figures 2(b), 2(d), and 2(f) in right column show the scattering cross sections calculated for three cases (I) – (III) of molecular arangement in the J-aggregate shell described in Sec. 2. The Figures in the top three rows correspond to different diameters of a golden core, $D = 2R$ (see Fig. 1): $D=80$ nm for 2(a) – 2(b), $D=100$ nm for 2(c) – 2(d), and $D=130$ nm for 2(e) – 2(f). Curves to show the scattering spectra: Grey curves (A) and black curves (B) are experimental data [21] and the results of our calculations for two-layer, Au/MUA, nanoparticles, respectively. Green curves (C) and red curves (D) are experimental data [21] and our theoretical results for three-layer Au/MUA/PIC nanoparticles, calculated for normal J-aggregate orientation. Cyan curves (E) show the results calculated using standard scalar J-aggregate dielectric function (1) with the parameters taken form [21]. Curves to show the scattering cross sections: black curves (F) – no outer shell; red curves (G) – normal J-aggregate orientation; blue curves (H) – tangential orientation; green dashed curves (I) – equiprobable orientation of the aggregate in space. The Fig. 2(g) shows the absorption spectra [60] with parallel (dashed red curve) and perpendicular (solid black curve) polarization of incident light relative to the PIC-dye J-aggregate axis.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Spectra of light absorption by Au/TMA/PIC nanoparticles. Figures 3(a) and 3(c) (left column) show a comparison of our theoretical results with experimental data from Supporting Information of [43]. Figures 3(b) and 3(d) (right column) show the absorption cross sections calculated for three cases (I) – (III) of molecular arrangement in the J-aggregate shell. The results are presented for the average diameters of Au/TMA particles $a = 9.1$ nm (Figs. 3(a) – 3(b)), and $a = 15.2$ nm (Figs. 3(c) – 3(d)), as estimated in [43]. In Figs. 3(a) and 3(c) (left column): Grey curves (A) and black curves (B) are experimental data and the results of our calculations for Au/TMA, respectively. Green curves (C) and blue curves (D) are experimental data and our theoretical results for Au/TMA/PIC, calculated for tangential J-aggregate orientation. Notations of curves in Figs. 3(b) and 3(d) (right column) are same as in Figs. 2(b), 2(d), and 2(f).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Results of simulation of the experimental data [76]. Figure 4(a) shows the absorption spectra of TPP: Green curve (A) – experimental data [76]. Yellow dashed-dotted curve (B) – results of fitting with the isotropic expression (4). Red curves (C) – the contribution of the longitudinal component of the model anisotropic tensor, $\sigma _{\parallel }/3$. Blue dashed curve (D) – the contribution of the transverse component $2\sigma _{\perp }/3$. Black dotted curve (E) – resulting spectra $\left \langle \sigma \right \rangle$. Figures 4(b) – 4(d) show light extinction cross sections by hybrid Ag/TPP nanoprisms computed with anisotropic TPP shell model. The nanoprism sizes correspond to those denoted in [76] as AgPRs-500, AgPRs-540 and AgPRs-560, respectively. In each figure: Grey curves (A) and black curves (B) show scaled experimental and orientally averaged theoretical results for bare AgPRs, respectively. Results for immobilized hybrid AgPR/TPP: Green curves (C) – scaled experimental data. Red curves (D) – computed spectra for normal aggregate orientation. Blue dashed curves (E) – results obtained for tangential orientation. Yellow dashed-dotted curves (F) – results obtained for isotropic outer shell material. In each figure vertical grey dotted lines mark absorption wavelengths of TPP.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Absorption spectra by SiO$_{2}$/J-aggregate nanoparticle calculated for different J-aggregate orientations. Figure 5(a) – results for the parameters of the TDBC J-aggregate. Red curve (A) – normal aggregate orientation. Blue curve (B) – tangential orientation. Green dashed curve (C) – equiprobable orientation. Yellow dashed-dotted curve (D) – isotropic shell. Figure 5(b) – results for different oscillator strengths, $f_{\text {J}}$. Dashed curves are for normal and solid curves are for tangential orientations: $f_{\text {J}} = 0.1$ – dashed red (A) and solid orange (B) curves; $f_{\text {J}} = 0.2$ – dashed blue (C) and solid cyan (D) curves; $f_{\text {J}} = 0.4$ – dashed dark-green (E) and solid green (F) curves. Figure 5(c) – results for different shell thickness, $d$. Dashed curves are for normal and solid curves are for tangential orientations: $d = 1$ nm – dashed black (A) and solid grey (B) curves; $d = 2$ nm – dashed red (C) and solid orange (D) curves; $d = 4$ nm – dashed blue (E) and solid cyan (F) curves; $d = 8$ nm – dashed dark-green (G) and solid green (H) curves. Vertical grey dotted line marks the TDBC J-aggregate absorption wavelength, $\lambda _{\text {J}} =587.6$ nm.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Absorption spectra by Au/J-aggregate nanoparticle calculated for different orientations and oscillator strengths of the J-aggregate: Figure 6(a) – $f_{\text {J}} = 0.05$, Fig. 6(b) – $f_{\text {J}} = 0.15$, Fig. 6(c) – $f_{\text {J}} = 0.45$. Black curve (A) – no shell. Red curve (B) – normal aggregate orientation. Blue curve (C) – tangential orientation. Green curve (D) – equiprobable orientation. Yellow curve (E) – isotropic shell. The sizes of nanoparticles: $D = 2R = 100$ nm, $d = 2$ nm. Vertical grey dotted line marks the TDBC J-aggregate absorption wavelength, $\lambda _{\text {J}} =587.6$ nm.

Tables (2)

Tables Icon

Table 1. Parameters of tensor dielectric function of PIC dye J-aggregate.

Tables Icon

Table 2. Parameters of tensor dielectric function of TPP dye.

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

ε J ( ω ) = ε J + f J ω J 2 ω J 2 ω 2 i ω γ J .
ε ( , ) ( ω ) = ε ( , ) + n f n ( , ) ( ω n ( , ) ) 2 ( ω n ( , ) ) 2 ω 2 i ω γ n ( , ) .
ε ^ norm = ( ε 0 0 0 ε 0 0 0 ε ) , \ \  ε ^ tang = ( 1 2 ε + 1 2 ε 0 0 0 1 2 ε + 1 2 ε 0 0 0 ε ) , ε ^ epo = ( 1 3 ε + 2 3 ε 0 0 0 1 3 ε + 2 3 ε 0 0 0 1 3 ε + 2 3 ε ) .
ε iso ( ω ) = ε J + n f n ( iso ) ω n 2 ω n 2 ω 2 i ω γ n .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.