Abstract
The error calculations in our Erratum [Opt. Lett. 33, 2854 (2008) ] are correct and consistent with the numbers presented in the Comment [Opt. Lett. 34, 2602 (2009) ] on our Letter [Opt. Lett. 32, 3558 (2007) ]. However, we still find that the pulses in Fig. 3 pose a problem in correctly reconstructing the electric field shape.
© 2009 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Lina Xu, Daniel J. Kane, and Rick Trebino
Opt. Lett. 34(17) 2602-2602 (2009)
Balakishore Yellampalle, KiYong Kim, and Antoniette J. Taylor
Opt. Lett. 33(23) 2854-2854 (2008)
Balakishore Yellampalle, KiYong Kim, and Antoniette J. Taylor
Opt. Lett. 32(24) 3558-3560 (2007)