Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Surface plasmon resonance gas sensor with a nanoporous gold film

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

This work demonstrates an optical gas sensor based on the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of nanoporous gold (NPG) thin films. The NPG films are prepared by a sputtering-dealloying combined method, and they can support the propagating surface plasmon mode and adsorb a large number of gaseous molecules; the interaction of the internal plasmon field and the adsorbed molecules enables the NPG-SPR sensor to have high sensitivity. The Kretschmann-type spectral NPG-SPR sensor is fabricated with a 60-nm-thick NPG film, and its spectral response to toxic H2S gas was investigated at room temperature. The optimal sensitivity of the sensor to H2S was achieved by controlling the dealloying time to tune the film porosity. Comparison of the spectral sensitivity to 100 ppm H2S indicates that the NPG-SPR sensor is at least six times more sensitive than a conventional Au-SPR sensor.

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group

Gas sensors are an important branch of sensor technology, which have been widely used in various fields, including air pollution monitoring, exhaled breath tests in clinical diagnosis, and drug and explosive detection. Gas sensors are mainly classified into electrical and optical types, the former also being called electronic noses, including metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors, electrochemical gas sensors, and catalytic combustion gas sensors. Electrical gas sensors are susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI), and some of them need to work at high temperatures, resulting in poor safety [1,2]. In contrast, optical gas sensors are inherently immune to EMI and can operate with high safety at room temperature [3,4]. In this sense, it is always desirable to develop advanced optical gas sensors to replace the electrical gas sensors currently used.

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors use an evanescent wave sensing technique capable of real-time detection of gas, chemical, and biological measurands [5,6]. The first SPR sensor was reported as early as 1982 [7], which was also the first SPR gas sensor. Since then, SPR sensors have been extensively studied, mainly for biosensing applications. Because gas molecules are generally much smaller than biomolecules, conventional SPR sensors are not sensitive enough to detect gas adsorption on the sensor surface like label-free detection of adsorbed biomolecules [8]. The gas-sensing films such as SnO2, WO3, and ZnO have been coated on Au-SPR sensors to improve sensitivity to toxic and harmful gases, including CO, CO2, H2S, NO2, and SO2 [911]. The sensitivity of such SPR sensors arises from the change in the refractive index of the gas-sensing film caused by chemisorption of gas molecules. Another approach to gas detection using SPR sensors is modification of the sensor chip with a nanoporous dielectric film [12]. Nanoporous dielectric films with huge internal surface areas can adsorb a large number of gas molecules and thus extend the depth of interaction between the plasmon field and the adsorbed molecules to the entire film thickness to cause significant sensitivity enhancement. This approach is effective but complicates the fabrication of SPR chips.

In this work, a simple and sensitive SPR gas sensor is developed by using nanoporous gold (NPG) films for surface plasmon wave propagation and gas molecule enrichment. NPG films are chemically robust and thermally stable and can be easily fabricated on solid substrates [13]. The huge internal surface of NPG films allows for simple functionalization through the well-established gold-thiol surface chemistry [14]. Furthermore, NPG films have salient propagating SPR effects and enable the plasmon field in the film to interact with the analyte molecules adsorbed on the pore wall of the film. Herein, uniform NPG thin films were prepared on glass substrates by using the sputtering-dealloying combined method, and the film thickness and porosity were controlled by controlling the sputtering time and dealloying time, to optimize the gas-sensing performance of the NPG-SPR sensor. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a colorless harmful gas, is selected as the analyte, and the standard sample of 100 ppm H2S in nitrogen was purchased from Shanghai MAOTOO Gas Company, Ltd. The H2S-sensing properties of the NPG film are investigated at room temperature by using a laboratory-made spectral SPR platform containing a high-index prism coupler (n = 1.796 @ 656.3 nm).

NPG is optically homogeneous in the visible near-infrared (NIR) range, and its average complex refractive index can be calculated as a function of porosity (p) based on the Bruggeman effective medium approximation. Here, the porosity is defined as the volume fraction occupied by pores. The propagation constant, βSP, for the surface plasmon traveling at the interface between air and the NPG film can be obtained based on Eq. (1) [15]:

$${\beta _{SP}} = {\beta _{SP0}} + \Delta \beta = \frac{\omega }{c}\sqrt {\frac{{{\varepsilon _m}{\varepsilon _a}}}{{{\varepsilon _m} + {\varepsilon _a}}}} + \Delta \beta ,$$
where βSP0 is the propagation constant of the surface plasmon at the interface between air and an NPG film of infinite thickness, and Δβ is the contribution of the finite thickness of the NPG film and the presence of the prism. ω is the angular frequency of light, c is the velocity of light in vacuum, and εa and εm are the real parts of dielectric constant for air and NPG, respectively. Figure 1 shows the calculated dispersion curves of the surface plasmon at the air/infinite-NPG interface, where the different curves correspond to different NPG porosity ranging from p = 0 to 0.5. Figure 1 also shows the dispersion curves for light in air (βa = ωc), light in the prism (βp = np ωc), and the evanescent wave produced at the total internal reflection (TIR) angle of φ = 45° (${\beta _{TIR}} = \sin \varphi \cdot {n_p}\omega /c$). According to the phase-matching condition, the value of βSP should be in the range between the two dispersion curves of light in air (black solid line) and in the prism (black dashed line). As the porosity of NPG film increases, the dispersion curve of the surface plasmon gradually moves downward, making the value range of βSP narrower. This implies that it is difficult to use large-porosity NPG films to generate SPR at the air/NPG interface and that the NPG-SPR gas sensors can be fabricated with the NPG thin films of p < 0.5.In addition, the dispersion of the surface plasmon at the air/infinite-NPG interface splits into two branches in the case of p > 0.3, which is explained in Ref. [16].

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Dispersions for the surface plasmon at the air/infinite-NPG interface, light in air (black solid line), light in the prism (black dashed line), and the evanescent wave produced via a TIR of φ = 45° (black dotted line).

Download Full Size | PDF

The NPG-SPR sensor chips were easily prepared by first sputtering gold–silver alloy films of ∼60 nm thickness on the cleaned glass substrates and then immersing the glass substrates in nitric acid to dissolve the silver component from the alloy film. The silver dissolution process, called dealloying, is accompanied by the self-assembly of gold atoms into a thermally stable nanoporous structure [17]. The above sputtering-dealloying combined method is described in detail in our previous work [13,14]. As shown in Fig. 2, the as-prepared Au–Ag alloy film is bright white, and the dealloyed film is brown. This brown color arises from localized SPR of nanostructured gold, indicating the NPG formation. Figure 3 displays scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of four NPG films with different dealloying times. By binarizing these SEM images, the porosity of the four NPG films was also estimated to be 0.37, 0.39, 0.42, and 0.40, corresponding to the dealloying times of 60 s, 90 s, 120 s, and 180 s, respectively (see Supplement 1, Fig. S1).

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Photographs of the large-area uniform Au–Ag alloy film and NPG film on the glass substrates (area: 25 mm × 25 mm).

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. SEM images of the NPG films prepared at different dealloying times: (a) 60 s, (b) 90 s, (c) 120 s, and (d) 180 s.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 4 schematically shows the Kretschmann-type spectral NPG-SPR gas sensor platform that contains a high-index glass prism (45°/45°/90°) and a gas-fluidic chamber. The platform allows the initial resonance wavelength (λR) to be adjusted by rotating the prism-immobilized stage to change the angle θ between the broadband collimated incident beam and the prism-surface normal (see Supplement 1, Fig. S2). Note that θ $> $ 0 if the incident light beam is on the side closer to the SPR chip, otherwise θ ≤ 0. The TIR angle φ is related to θ by Eq. (2):

$$\varphi = \arcsin \left[ {\frac{{{n_p}(\lambda )}}{{{n_g}(\lambda )}}\sin\left( {\frac{\pi }{4} + \arcsin \left( {\frac{{\sin\theta }}{{{n_p}(\lambda )}}} \right)} \right)} \right],$$
where np (λ) and ng (λ) are the refractive indexes of the prism and the glass substrate, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of the Kretschmann-type spectral NPG-SPR sensor platform for in situ gas detection at room temperature.

Download Full Size | PDF

To investigate the effect of porosity of the NPG film on the sensitivity of the NPG-SPR sensor to H2S gas, four NPG films with different porosities were prepared by controlling the dealloying time. Figure 5(a) shows the reflected light spectra of these four NPG films recorded before and after the injection of H2S gas. For better comparison, the initial resonance wavelength of each NPG film was adjusted at λR ≈ 700 nm. Exposure of these four NPG films to 100 ppm H2S gas results in an increase of 7.37 nm, 16.7 nm, 33.59 nm, and 25.96 nm in resonance wavelength, corresponding to the dealloying times of t = 60 s, 90 s, 120 s, and 180 s, respectively. The porosities of the NPG films were determined by fitting the experimental SPR spectra using the Fresnel formula combined with Bruggeman’s approximation equation. The effectiveness of this method has been demonstrated in our previous work [13]. The numerical simulation was fulfilled at θ = –10° using a multilayer structure composed of the prism, the glass substrate, a 10-nm Au layer, a 60-nm NPG film, and the air superstrate. As shown in Fig. 5(b), the best fits to the resonance spectra measured with the four NPG films lead to the porosities of p = 0.38, 0.41, 0.42, and 0.41, which are very close to the corresponding values obtained from the SEM images. It is worth noting that without having an NPG film only the 10-nm Au layer cannot support the SPR mode (see Supplement 1, Fig. S3). This confirms that the NPG film is indeed responsible for the SPR generation and the measured response to H2S gas. The optimal sensitivity of ΔλR = 33.59 nm was achieved with the NPG film of p = 0.42 and t =120 s. Using the same NPG film, the SPR response to 50 ppm H2S was measured to be ΔλR = 27 nm, being smaller than that to 100 ppm H2S (see Supplement 1, Fig. S4).

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. (a) Reflected spectra with different dealloying time (t) before and after injection of H2S gas. The optimal sensitivity of ΔλR = 33.59 nm corresponding to t =120 s. (b) Measured light intensity spectra and calculated reflectance spectra at θ = –10° with different t (Insert: magnified view of the reflectivity valleys).

Download Full Size | PDF

To compare the sensitivity between the NPG-SPR sensor and a conventional Au-SPR sensor, the Au-SPR chips were also prepared by successively sputtering a 3-nm Cr layer and a 50-nm Au layer on a glass slide. The SPR spectra for the NPG and dense Au films were measured at different incident angles before and after exposure to 100 ppm H2S (see Supplement 1, Fig. S5). The values of λR for both the NPG-SPR and Au-SPR sensors before and after the H2S injection were measured at different incident angles. Figure 6 shows that angular dependences of λR for the NPG-SPR sensor are similar to those for the Au-SPR sensor. A significant difference between them is that the change of λR caused by H2S exposure of the NPG film is larger than 30 nm at each incident angle of interest while exposure of the Au film to the same concentration of H2S leads to a small change of ΔλR < 5 nm. Comparing the responses of two sensors at the same incident angle of θ = –13° in Fig. 6 reveals that the NPG-SPR sensor is at least six times more sensitive than the conventional Au-SPR sensor.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Resonance wavelengths of the NPG film measured as a function of the incident angle before and after exposure to 100 ppm H2S. The curves obtained with a dense gold film also shown for comparison.

Download Full Size | PDF

To determine the sensor response time, the adsorption process of H2S molecules on the NPG-SPR chip was monitored in real time. The reflected light intensity spectra were successively recorded at 0.2 s intervals starting before the H2S injection until the spectra became stable. As shown in Fig. 7(a), each spectrum exhibits an absorption valley. The valley locates at λR = 702 nm before the H2S injection and starts to shift to longer wavelengths from t = 40 s and stabilizes at λR =735.26 nm at 184 s at which point the H2S injection was stopped. Figure 7(a) indicates that by choosing the wavelength change (Δλ) at a fixed intensity of I = 0.33 as the sensitivity parameter, a spectral response larger than ΔλR can be obtained. Figure 7(b) displays the two time courses of ΔλR and Δλ @ I = 0.33. At a given time, ΔλR is smaller than Δλ @ I = 0.33. The maximum values of ΔλR and Δλ @ I = 0.33 are 33.26 nm and 54.27 nm, respectively. The two curves in Fig. 7(b) are similar to each other, which represents the dynamic process of the adsorption of H2S molecules within the NPG film. The response time of the NPG-SPR sensor, which is defined as the time for ΔλR to reach 90% of its maximum, is estimated to be 45 s. As can be seen from Fig. 7(b), injecting N2 gas in the chamber did not restore λR, which indicates that adsorption of H2S molecules within the NPG film is an irreversible process. Figure 7(c) shows the time-dependent spectral changes relative to the spectrum recorded at 40 s, from which a large intensity variation (ΔI) at a fixed wavelength of λ = 675 nm was observed. This implies that the NPG-SPR sensor can operate at a single wavelength for sensitive H2S detection at room temperature. Figure 7(d) indicates that the time course of ΔI is similar to those of ΔλR and Δλ @ I = 0.33.

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. (a) Reflected light intensity spectra measured at different times after injection of 100 ppm H2S; (b) two time courses of the wavelength changes at a fixed intensity of I = 0.33 and the resonance wavelength shifts (ΔλR); (c) spectral changes at different times relative to the resonance spectrum recorded at 40 s; (d) time course of the maximum change of the reflected light intensity at λ= 675 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

After exposure of the fresh NPG film to air for 24 h, the sensor response to 100 ppm H2S was observed to become smaller (see Supplement 1, Fig. S6), this indicates a negative influence of the air exposure on the NPG-SPR sensor performance due to surface contamination. To overcome this problem, 5-min ultrasonic cleaning of the NPG-SPR chip in de-ionized water followed by quick drying with nitrogen flow is performed before testing. This surface cleaning process was demonstrated to be very effective in keeping the sensor response fully repeatable [18]. Figure 8 shows the sensor responses to 100 ppm H2S gas measured at different times after preparation of the NPG film (p = 0.42). For better comparison, the initial resonance wavelength was set to be λR ≈ 700 nm by adjusting the angle of incidence before each test. The sensor response obtained with the fresh NPG-SPR chip is ΔλR = 32.86 nm. This chip was ultrasonically cleaned after being exposed to air for 24 hours and 48 hours. Repeat testing of the cleaned chip showed ΔλR = 32.17 nm and 31.83 nm, respectively, both of which are almost identical to that obtained with the fresh chip, verifying the complete surface regeneration of the NPG film by ultrasonic cleaning in de-ionized water.

 figure: Fig. 8.

Fig. 8. Spectral response of the NPG-SPR sensor to 100 ppm H2S measured (a) immediately, and (b) 24 hours and (c) 48 hours after the sensor chip preparation (p = 0.42 for the NPG film used).

Download Full Size | PDF

In conclusion, a Kretschmann-type NPG-SPR gas sensor with wavelength interrogation was demonstrated in this work. Large-area uniform NPG films with controllable thickness and porosity were fabricated on glass substrates by a sputtering-dealloying combination, which exhibits salient SPR effects in the visible NIR range when exposed to air. The NPG-SPR sensor is highly sensitive to toxic H2S gas at room temperature due to the interaction of the plasmon field with the gaseous molecules adsorbed on the inner and outer surfaces of the NPG film. The optimal sensitivity of ΔλR = 33.59 nm at 100 ppm H2S gas was achieved using the NPG film of p = 0.42, which is at least six times higher than that of a conventional Au-SPR sensor. Long-time storage of the NPG films in air reduces the sensitivity to H2S, and ultrasonic cleaning of the NPG-SPR chips in de-ionized water results in a fully reproducible response at room temperature, the response time being typically 45 s. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of NPG thin films as a highly sensitive SPR gas sensor.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB2008700, 2021YFB3200100); National Natural Science Foundation of China (61871365, 61931018, 62121003); Special Research Assistant Project of CAS.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Supplemental document

See Supplement 1 for supporting content.

REFERENCES

1. P. Cao, Z. Yang, S. T. Navale, S. Han, X. Liu, W. Liu, Y. Lu, F. J. Stadler, and D. Zhu, Sens. Actuators, B 298, 126850 (2019). [CrossRef]  

2. S. Zhao, Y. Shen, F. Hao, C. Kang, B. Cui, D. Wei, and F. Meng, Appl. Surf. Sci. 538, 148140 (2021). [CrossRef]  

3. B. Du, Y. Zheng, J. Ye, D. Wang, C. Mao, and N. Sun, Opt. Lett. 47, 1145 (2022). [CrossRef]  

4. Y. Jiang, Y. Yi, G. Brambilla, and P. Wang, Opt. Lett. 46, 1558 (2021). [CrossRef]  

5. B. A. Prabowo, A. Purwidyantri, and K.-C. Liu, Biosensors 8, 80 (2018). [CrossRef]  

6. J.-H. Qu, A. Dillen, W. Saeys, J. Lammertyn, and D. Spasic, Anal. Chim. Acta 1104, 10 (2020). [CrossRef]  

7. C. Nylander, B. Liedberg, and T. Lind, Sens. Actuators 3, 79 (1982). [CrossRef]  

8. M. Ikeda, H. Matsui, Y. Yano, H. Yamahara, and H. Tabata, Sens. Actuators, B 344, 130310 (2021). [CrossRef]  

9. A. Paliwal, A. Sharma, M. Tomar, and V. Gupta, Sens. Actuators, B 250, 679 (2017). [CrossRef]  

10. A. Paliwal, A. Sharma, M. Tomar, and V. Gupta, Sens. Actuators, B 216, 497 (2015). [CrossRef]  

11. G. S. Mei, P. S. Menon, and G. Hegde, Mater. Res. Express 7, 012003 (2020). [CrossRef]  

12. A. Berrier, P. Offermans, R. Cools, B. van Megen, W. Knoben, G. Vecchi, J. G. Rivas, M. Crego-Calama, and S. H. Brongersma, Sens. Actuators, B 160, 181 (2011). [CrossRef]  

13. C. Chen, Z. Liu, C. Cai, and Z. Qi, J. Mater. Chem. C 9, 6815 (2021). [CrossRef]  

14. L. Wang, X.-M. Wan, R. Gao, D.-F. Lu, and Z.-M. Qi, Sensors 17, 1255 (2017). [CrossRef]  

15. H. Raether, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, 1988).

16. M. O. Stetsenko, L. S. Maksimenko, S. P. Rudenko, I. M. Krishchenko, A. A. Korchovyi, S. B. Kryvyi, E. B. Kaganovich, and B. K. Serdega, Nanoscale Res Lett 11, 116 (2016). [CrossRef]  

17. J. Erlebacher, M. J. Aziz, A. Karma, N. Dimitrov, and K. Sieradzki, Nature 410, 450 (2001). [CrossRef]  

18. C. K. A. Nyamekye, Q. Zhu, R. Mahmood, S. C. Weibel, A. C. Hillier, and E. A. Smith, Anal. Chim. Acta 1048, 123 (2019). [CrossRef]  

Supplementary Material (1)

NameDescription
Supplement 1       Supplement 1

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Dispersions for the surface plasmon at the air/infinite-NPG interface, light in air (black solid line), light in the prism (black dashed line), and the evanescent wave produced via a TIR of φ = 45° (black dotted line).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Photographs of the large-area uniform Au–Ag alloy film and NPG film on the glass substrates (area: 25 mm × 25 mm).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. SEM images of the NPG films prepared at different dealloying times: (a) 60 s, (b) 90 s, (c) 120 s, and (d) 180 s.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of the Kretschmann-type spectral NPG-SPR sensor platform for in situ gas detection at room temperature.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. (a) Reflected spectra with different dealloying time (t) before and after injection of H2S gas. The optimal sensitivity of ΔλR = 33.59 nm corresponding to t =120 s. (b) Measured light intensity spectra and calculated reflectance spectra at θ = –10° with different t (Insert: magnified view of the reflectivity valleys).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Resonance wavelengths of the NPG film measured as a function of the incident angle before and after exposure to 100 ppm H2S. The curves obtained with a dense gold film also shown for comparison.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. (a) Reflected light intensity spectra measured at different times after injection of 100 ppm H2S; (b) two time courses of the wavelength changes at a fixed intensity of I = 0.33 and the resonance wavelength shifts (ΔλR); (c) spectral changes at different times relative to the resonance spectrum recorded at 40 s; (d) time course of the maximum change of the reflected light intensity at λ= 675 nm.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. Spectral response of the NPG-SPR sensor to 100 ppm H2S measured (a) immediately, and (b) 24 hours and (c) 48 hours after the sensor chip preparation (p = 0.42 for the NPG film used).

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

β S P = β S P 0 + Δ β = ω c ε m ε a ε m + ε a + Δ β ,
φ = arcsin [ n p ( λ ) n g ( λ ) sin ( π 4 + arcsin ( sin θ n p ( λ ) ) ) ] ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.