Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Nonlinear optical response of heme solutions

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Heme is the prosthetic group for cytochrome that exists in nearly all living organisms and serves as a vital component of human red blood cells (RBCs). Tunable optical nonlinearity in suspensions of RBCs has been demonstrated previously, however, the nonlinear optical response of a pure heme (without membrane structure) solution has not been studied to our knowledge. In this work, we show optical nonlinearity in two common kinds of heme (i.e., hemin and hematin) solutions by a series of experiments and numerical simulations. We find that the mechanism of nonlinearity in heme solutions is distinct from that observed in the RBC suspensions where the nonlinearity can be easily tuned through optical power, concentration, and the solution properties. In particular, we observe an unusual phenomenon wherein the heme solution exhibits negative optical nonlinearity and render self-collimation of a focused beam at specific optical powers, enabling shape-preserving propagation of light to long distances. Our results may have potential applications in optical imaging and medical diagnosis through blood.

© 2024 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Tired and stressed: direct holographic quasi-static stretching of aging echinocytes and discocytes in plasma using optical tweezers [Invited]

Alexander B. Stilgoe, Anatolii V. Kashchuk, Marie-Anne Balanant, Deborah Santangelo, Timo A. Nieminen, Emilie Sauret, Robert Flower, and Halina Rubinsztein-Dunlop
Biomed. Opt. Express 15(2) 656-671 (2024)

Optical trapping in an absorbing medium: from optical tweezing to thermal tweezing

Poonam Kumari, J. A. Dharmadhikari, A. K. Dharmadhikari, H. Basu, S. Sharma, and D. Mathur
Opt. Express 20(4) 4645-4652 (2012)

Nonlinear optical response of colloidal suspensions

W. M. Lee, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, K. Dholakia, and E. M. Wright
Opt. Express 17(12) 10277-10289 (2009)

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic of the experimental setup and two typical heme structures. (a) Two distinct molecular structures of the heme are used as solutes for two different nonlinear solutions. Left: hematin; Right: hemin. (b) A simple setup is used for nonlinear propagation experiments, where L1 and L2 form a beam expander; L3 is the focusing lens, and L4 is the imaging lens. CCD: charge-coupled device used as a beam analyzer together with the BeamView software.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Closed-aperture Z-scan measurements for the nonlinear refractive index coefficient of different types of heme solutions. Blue and red dotted lines are for hematin-ethanol and hematin-water solutions, and the gray dotted line is for hemin-ethanol solution. The relevant result of hemin-water solution is not presented, because of poor transmittance (hemin is difficult to dissolve in water). The concentration of hematin/ hemin in these three solutions is at the same value of 1.8 × 10−4 g/mL.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) Measured output beam diameter as a function of optical powers, after propagation over 30 mm in hematin-ethanol solutions of different concentrations. (b) The same as (a) but for hematin-water solutions. (c) Intensity pattern of the beam at the input facet of the cuvette. (d1-d4) Output patterns at different optical powers in hematin-ethanol solutions with 3.75 × 10−4 g/mL. (e1-e4) Side-views of beam propagations corresponding to (d1-d4). It is noted that the full width at 1/e2 of the ring pattern at the high-power region is meaningless, so it does not appear in (a) and (b).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Simulation results. (a) Input beam. (b)-(c) Output patterns at different (lower) powers. (d) and (e) are output patterns at severely high powers, with severe convection. (f) is the optical pattern, which is cut at the position of the orange frame in (i) during propagation. (g)-(i) Side views of beam propagation.

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

I ( x , y ) = 2 P π ω 2 exp ( 2 ( x 2 + y 2 ) ω 2 ) ,
v y = β g [ Δ T ] m a x π h 2 16 μ ,
Δ T ( x , y , t ) = α 0 P π ρ c p { 0 t d t 8 D t + ω 2 exp [ 2 [ ( y v y t ) 2 + x 2 ] 8 D t + ω 2 ] } ,
n = n 0 + d n d T Δ T .
i z ψ + 1 2 k 2 ψ + k d n d T Δ T n 0 ψ + i α 0 2 ψ = 0 ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.