Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler based broadband and compact silicon mode multiplexer/demultiplexer

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A mode multiplexer/demultiplexer (MUX/DeMUX) is a crucial component for constructing mode-division multiplexing (MDM) systems. In this paper, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a wide-bandwidth and highly-integrated mode MUX/DeMUX based on an inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler. By introducing a functional region composed of subunits, efficient mode conversion and evolution can be achieved, greatly improving the mode conversion efficiency. The optimized mode MUX/DeMUX has a size of only 4 µm × 2.2 µm. An MDM-link consisting of a mode MUX and a mode DeMUX was fabricated on the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform. The experimental results show that the 3-dB bandwidth of the TE fundamental mode and first-order mode can reach 116 nm and 138 nm, respectively. The proposed mode MUX/DeMUX is scalable and could provide a feasible solution for constructing high-performance MDM systems.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Silicon photonics offers advantages such as high integration density, low power consumption, and opto-electronic integration, making it promising for applications in optical communications, sensing, and computing [13]. Silicon photonics waveguides have a high refractive-index contrast, enabling ultra-high integration density. In addition, silicon photonics based devices can be fabricated using the standard CMOS (Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistor) technology, allowing for high integration with other integrated circuits (ICs) and significantly reducing manufacturing costs [4,5].

On-chip mode-division multiplexing (MDM) technology based on silicon photonics is a working technique that utilizes the optical mode multiplexing technology to transmit multiple signals simultaneously on the same bus waveguide [68]. It has significant importance in improving the performance and reducing the cost of optical communication/interconnect systems due to its characteristics of high-speed, high-capacity, and low-power consumption. To construct on-chip MDM systems, various mode-controlling devices have been proposed to achieve functions such as optical emission, transmission, mode modulation, mode multiplexing/demultiplexing, mode switching, mode exchanger, mode splitting, and so on [914]. Among them, the mode multiplexer/demultiplexer (MUX/DeMUX) is a device used to multiplex multiple optical signals over different fundamental modes into different high-order modes within the same bus waveguide at the transmission terminal, and these signals are demultiplexed and restored to their original signals by the mode DeMUX at the receiving terminal [1517]. The mode MUX and DeMUX have the same structure, but operate in opposite ways, and both are the key components of MDM systems.

In recent years, many structures have been reported for realizing the mode MUX/DeMUXs, including the asymmetric directional couplers (ADCs) [18,19], adiabatic couplers (ACs) [20,21], multimode interference (MMI) couplers [22,23], Y-junctions [24,25], micro-ring resonators (MRRs) [26,27], subwavelength gratings (SWGs) [28,29], inverse-design [30,31], etc. The ADCs based mode MUX/DeMUXs have been theoretically and experimentally reported to achieve low loss and low mode crosstalk at the central wavelength of 1550 nm [18,19]. However, traditional ADC structures require strict mode-to-mode phase matching conditions, leading to tight fabrication tolerances and the need for further bandwidth expansion. Sun et al. experimentally demonstrated an AC based mode MUX/DeMUX, which can achieve the crosstalk of lower than -20 dB and the insertion loss of ∼1 dB over a wavelength range of 75 nm [20]. While structures based on ACs can achieve high performance and larger fabrication tolerances, their mode evolution efficiency is relatively low, resulting in longer device lengths, typically around 200 µm [20,21]. A mode MUX based on an MMI structure proposed by Wang et al. can achieve a working bandwidth exceeding 70 nm with crosstalk levels below −10 dB [22]. However, most conventional MMI-based ones often require excessively long device dimensions to realize mode evolution and conversion [23]. Chen et al. reported a Y-junction based mode MUX/DeMUX, which achieve the best demultiplexing crosstalk of −31.5 dB within a bandwidth from 1537 to 1566 nm [24]. Although Y-junctions can realize low-loss and low-crosstalk mode MUX/DeMUXs, but their device lengths typically exceed 50 µm. The MRR can realize low-crosstalk mode MUX/DeMUXs and is compatible with wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) systems, but its operating bandwidth is relatively narrow (a typical scale of a few nanometers) [26,27]. The SWG structure based mode MUX/DeMUXs can achieve a relatively large bandwidth of >50 nm and a low crosstalk of < −16 dB, but its design process is complex and has a small feature size of SWG [28,29]. While traditional direct binary search (DBS) algorithm-based mode MUX/DeMUX can reduce the footprint to a few square micrometers, this algorithm's computation time is relatively long [30,31]. Hence, there is a need to propose new structures to further reduce the device size.

The ADC structure has many advantages, such as low loss, simple structure, and easy scalability, and has been widely utilized in mode multiplexing and demultiplexing [32,33]. However, the earliest proposed ADC structure requires strict phase-matching conditions, resulting in a narrow bandwidth and tight fabrication tolerance. To address this issue, a tapered directional coupler was proposed to construct a mode MUX/DeMUX, which includes a fixed-width waveguide and a tapered waveguide [34]. The relatively high fabrication tolerance of phase matching can be achieved by modifying the equivalent refractive index slope. Although the bandwidth and fabrication tolerance have been improved in the single-tapered waveguide based coupler, it still requires the phase matching, leading to limited bandwidth and limited improvement in fabrication tolerance. In 2015, Wang et al. proposed and demonstrated a mode-evolution counter-tapered coupler, which can construct a broadband MDM-Link [35]. This structure consists of two waveguides with counter-tapered cores, and different-order mode conversions can be achieved via the internal mode evolution. The experimentally measured 1-dB bandwidth is greater than 180 nm. In 2017, Li and Dai proposed a dual-core adiabatic tapers structure, which can achieve a low-loss and low-crosstalk mode MUX/DeMUX [36]. The specific mode drop can be achieved by using the supermode evolution inside the two tapered waveguides. The operating bandwidth was measured to be 65 nm. The coupler of the two tapered waveguides is no longer based on the phase matching but based on the mode evolution, which can achieve relatively large operating bandwidth. Nevertheless, the sizes of these device are still large, typically close to or even greater than 100 µm, due to the long evolution distance required for the mode conversion.

More recently, the inverse-designed photonic devices have attracted considerable attention due to their ultra-compact size and simple optimization-design process [37,38]. Several algorithms have been reported for designing photonic devices, including the DBS algorithm [39], particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm [40], binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO) algorithm [41], gradient-based optimization algorithm [42,43], etc. Based on the inverse design, the size of photonic devices can be reduced by almost an order of magnitude, providing a feasible solution for constructing ultra-compact mode MUX/DeMUXs. In 2021, Liu et al. proposed an inverse-designed mode MUX/DeMUX based on the DBS algorithm [30]. This device has a footprint of 6.8 µm × 6 µm, insertion loss of <1.4 dB and crosstalk of −15 dB over a 40-nm bandwidth. In 2019, a mode MUX/DeMUX with a footprint of 3.4 µm × 3.9 µm was reported based on the DBS, which can experimentally provide insertion loss of <0.92 dB and crosstalk of −20.43 dB over an 80-nm bandwidth [31]. In 2018, Chang et al. proposed and experimentally demonstrated a two-mode MUX/DeMUX based on an inverse-designed Y-junction [39]. The proposed device is with a footprint of 2.4 µm × 3 µm, and the measured insertion loss and crosstalk are less than 1.0 dB and −24 dB over a 60-nm bandwidth. In 2020, Piggott et al. experimentally demonstrated an inverse-designed two-mode MUX/DeMUX with a compact footprint of 3.55 µm × 2.55 µm, insertion loss of <1.0 dB and crosstalk of −15.6 dB over a 100-nm bandwidth [43]. In 2020, Yang et al. inversely designed and experimentally measured a 4-mode MUX/DeMUX, and the design area is 6.5 µm × 6.5 µm [44]. The measured insertion loss is less than 0.8 dB, and 3-dB bandwidth is wider than 120 nm with the mode crosstalk less than −18 dB. In 2023, Shang et al. demonstrated an inverse-designed mode MUX/DeMUX on the lithium niobate-on-insulator (LNOI) platform [45]. The optimized device is with a footprint of 12 µm × 12 µm, an insertion loss ∼1.5 dB and a crosstalk < −15.8 dB over an 80-nm bandwidth. In 2022, Zhou et al. inversely optimized and experimentally demonstrated a 4-mode MUX/DeMUX, in which the functional region is with a footprint of 4.8 µm × 4.8 µm [46]. The measured results show that the insertion loss and crosstalk are less than ∼1.5 and −13 dB, respectively over a 40-nm bandwidth. In 2021, Chen et al. proposed and investigated a mode MUX/DeMUX based on the PSO algorithm [47]. The optimized length of the proposed device is longer than 27 µm. The measured insertion loss and crosstalk are less than 4.73 and −15.15 dB from 1525 to 1596 nm. From the above-mentioned reports, it is evident that the inverse design can reduce the size of mode MUX/DeMUXs to a few square micrometers. Although the mode MUX/DeMUXs based on reverse design offer a wide operating bandwidth and low mode crosstalk, the inverse design algorithms typically require a significant amount of computation time. Because the computation time required for reverse design algorithms is directly proportional to the size of the functional area of the device. Therefore, proposing new structures to further reduce the size of the device's functional region becomes a challenging aspect of research.

In this paper, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a broadband and compact silicon mode MUX/DeMUX based on an inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler. By embedding functional region composed of subunits between two counter-tapered waveguides, efficient short-range mode evolution can be achieved, overcoming the drawback of the traditional dual-core adiabatic-tapers, which requires long-range supermode evolution. Additionally, by incorporating two counter-tapered waveguides outside the functional region, the required footprint of the functional region can be significantly reduced compared with the earlier works [30,31,39,4347]. This leads to a substantial reduction in the optimization design time and a significant improvement in the device's operating performance. The functional region was inversely designed using the combination of DBS algorithm and 3D full vectorial finite-difference time-domain (3D-FV-FDTD) method, resulting in a size of only 4 µm × 800 nm. The optimal design results in a compact device size of only 4 × 2.2 µm2 for the dual-mode MUX/DeMUX. The experimentally measured 3-dB bandwidths of TE1 and TE0 modes are 138 nm and 116 nm, respectively. The proposed structure is scalable and can be used for mode multiplexing and demultiplexing of more mode channels through cascading.

2. Structure, operating principle, and inverse-design

The schematic diagram of the proposed mode MUX/DeMUX based on an inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler is shown in Fig. 1. The proposed structure consists of an input dual-mode waveguide with a port I, two output single-mode waveguides with ports O1 and O2, and a functional region composed of subunits embedded between two counter-tapered waveguides. The distance between the two tapered waveguides is fixed, while the upper tapered waveguide gradually decreases in width from supporting dual-mode to supporting single-mode, and the lower tapered waveguide gradually increases in width from nanoscale (50 nm) to supporting single-mode. Traditional dual-core adiabatic-taper based mode MUX/DeMUXs rely on internal supermode evolution for mode multiplexing and demultiplexing, requiring a sufficient length to achieve adiabaticity, which results in a device length typically greater than tens or even hundreds of micrometers. For our proposed inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler, the functional region composed of subunits is introduced and its effective refractive index can be adjusted by inverse optimization of the distribution of square subunits. This functional region can directly guide high-order modes to evolve into the fundamental mode without relying on supermode evolution, greatly reducing the device size to the order of micrometers. Furthermore, the subwavelength subunit-structure based functional region has good working bandwidth characteristics, enabling broadband devices.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed mode MUX/DeMUX based on an inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler.

Download Full Size | PDF

As shown in Fig. 2, when the TE0 mode is injected at the port I, it is transmitted to the upper tapered waveguide through the input dual-mode waveguide, where the mode spot size is compressed to the size of the fundamental mode in the single-mode waveguide. Then, it is transmitted to the output single-mode waveguide and finally outputted at the port O1. When the TE1 mode is inputted at the port I, the upper tapered waveguide narrows from supporting dual-mode to only supporting single-mode, causing the TE1 mode to cut off and be “squeezed” into the functional region. After being guided by the functional region, its optical field evolves into the lower tapered waveguide, where the narrow end should be as small as possible to achieve more adiabatic coupling to its interior. Then, the coupled mode gradually evolves into the TE0 mode in the output waveguide, and finally outputs at the port O2. In contrast to the traditional dual-core adiabatic-taper, which requires a small waveguide spacing between the two output waveguides (<200 nm) for mode coupling evolution, our proposed inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler has greater redundancy for the output waveguide spacing, which can be set to several hundred nanometers or even micrometers. Therefore, the proposed structure has a lower output-port crosstalk.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) Structure and parameters of inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler based mode MUX/DeMUX. (b) The relationship between the transmission (left y-axis) and FOM (right y-axis) with respect to number of iterations.

Download Full Size | PDF

The structure and parameters of the inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler based mode MUX/DeMUX are shown in Fig. 2(a). The proposed device is based on the SOI platform, with a core waveguide thickness of h = 220 nm. The input waveguide is a dual-mode waveguide that can support both the TE1 and TE0 modes, and its width is chosen to be w1 = 1 µm. The two output waveguides are both single-mode waveguides, with a width of w2 = 400 nm, which is a commonly used width for single-mode waveguides. The width of the upper tapered waveguide gradually changes from w1 to w2, while the width of the lower tapered waveguide changes from a narrow end width of 50 nm to w2. To ensure adiabatic propagation of the TE0 mode in the upper tapered waveguide, the optimized tapered waveguide length is set to L = 4 µm. The size of the square subunit is set to w3 = 100 nm according to the actual fabrication-process accuracy. The size of the functional region is set to L × g = 4 µm × 800 nm, which includes 40 × 8 square subunits. One major drawback of the DBS algorithm-based inverse design is its lengthy computation time. By introducing an external counter-tapered coupler, we can reduce the entire functional region's area from a maximum of 40.8 µm2 to only 3.2 µm2 (a reduction of over 12 times) compared with the earlier works [30,31,43]. Consequently, under the same subunit size conditions, the number of subunits required for the DBS algorithm will be significantly reduced, leading to a substantial reduction in the required computation time. The issue of extra loss in the inverse-designed functional region is another drawback. Generally, smaller subunit sizes result in lower extra losses. However, due to the limitation of fabrication processes, subunit sizes within the functional region are typically larger than 100 nm, causing some extra loss. Therefore, reducing the size of the functional region can decrease the magnitude of extra loss it incurs. Because our proposed functional region has the distinct advantage of a small size, its associated extra loss is lower compared to previously reported structures [30,31,43].

The functional region is inversely optimized using the DBS algorithm, which is designed to not affect the transmission of the TE0 mode and convert the input TE1 mode to the TE0 mode. The specific optimization steps are as follows:

  • (1) Randomly set the 0/1 matrix distribution of 40 × 8 square subunits in the functional region, where 0 and 1 represent the subunit material as silicon dioxide and silicon, respectively.
  • (2) Define the figure of merit (FOM) as FOM = Tport O1-TE0/Tport I-TE0 + Tport O2-TE0/Tport I-TE1, where Tport O1-TE0 is the power of the TE0 mode output from the port O1, Tport O2-TE0 is the power of the TE0 mode output from the port O2, and Tport I-TE0 and Tport I-TE1 are the powers of the input TE0 and TE1 modes, respectively.
  • (3) Using the 3D-FV-FDTD method, the FOM values for each subunit are calculated when the material is either 0 or 1, and the material with the higher FOM value is chosen.
  • (4) Iterate through the 40 × 8 subunits, comparing the FOM values and selecting the material with the higher value.
  • (5) Repeat the iteration process until the FOM value reaches the maximum or a certain threshold, obtaining the optimal structural parameters.
The relationship between the number of iterations and the normalized transmission and FOM values at the center wavelength of 1550 nm is shown in Fig. 2(b). It can be seen that with the increase of the number of iterations, the FOM value shows an increasing and gradually saturating trend; the transmission of the input TE1 mode converted to the output TE0 mode also shows a similar trend, but the transmission of the input TE0 mode shows small fluctuation. In this work, the structure after the 5th iteration is selected as the final device layout. At this time, the FOM value is 1.70, and the transmission of TE1 and TE0 modes are calculated to be 88% and 82%, respectively. The actual time cost of the whole optimization is about 25.3 h under the conditions of a workstation configuration with an Intel i9-10980XE CPU@ 3.00 GHz (36 cores) and 32GB of RAM. There are three methods to consider for accelerating DBS optimization design. (1) Hybrid Neural Network (NN) - DBS System: in this approach, we can build a hybrid system that combines a neural network with the DBS algorithm [48]. The neural network can be trained to predict the DBS's output results, reducing the number of iterations required in the DBS loop. This way, we can use the neural network to guide the optimization process more efficiently. (2) Gradient-Oriented Binary Search Method: this method involves combining DBS with the adjoint method [49]. It creates a gradient-oriented binary search approach. By establishing a relationship between refractive index gradients and FOM, this algorithm guides the flipping process more effectively, which can significantly speed up the DBS optimization process. (3) Bayesian Direct-Binary-Search Algorithm: here, the DBS is integrated with Bayesian inference, and this approach is known as the Bayesian direct-binary-search algorithm [50]. It utilizes statistical information obtained through Bayesian inference to accelerate the DBS optimization process. By incorporating probabilistic information, the algorithm can make more informed decisions about parameter adjustments.

The propagating fields of the optimized mode MUX/DeMUX obtained by the 3D-FV-FDTD method are shown in Fig. 3. When the TE0 mode is input at the port I, the mode field is compressed by the upper taper, and the mode size is reduced from a dual-mode waveguide to a single-mode waveguide without changing the mode order, and finally output from the port O1. It can be observed from Fig. 3(a) that the influence of the subunit structure in the functional region on the transmission of the input TE0 mode can be ignored. When the TE1 mode is input at the port I, the TE1 mode field is “squeezed” by the upper taper due to the gradually narrowing waveguide, and leaks out of the taper waveguide. Due to the guiding effect of the subunit structure in the functional region, the leaked mode field will propagate along the functional region and then couple with the inverted taper waveguide on the lower side, eventually evolving into the TE0 mode in the output single-mode waveguide and being output from the port O2. It can be seen from Fig. 3(b) that although the length of the taper waveguide is only L = 4 µm and the distance between the output waveguides is g = 800 nm, the introduction of the subunit functional region enables efficient conversion between the TE1 mode and TE0 mode, overcoming the long-distance defect of traditional supermode evolution.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Propagation Hy fields of the optimized mode MUX/DeMUX based on inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler when (a) TE0 mode and (b) TE1 mode are injected at the port I, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

The relationship between the transmission spectra and the operating wavelength of the optimized mode MUX/DeMUX is calculated using the 3D-FV-FDTD method, as shown in Fig. 4. When the TE0 mode is input from the port I, the insertion loss and crosstalk are calculated to be 0.87 dB and −14.28 dB, respectively, at the central wavelength of 1550 nm. When the wavelength varies between 1.50 µm and 1.65 µm, the insertion loss and crosstalk of this mode are less than 1.54 dB and −10.89 dB, respectively. When the TE1 mode is input from the port I, the insertion loss and crosstalk at the central wavelength are 0.56 dB and −21.56 dB, respectively, and the insertion loss and crosstalk within the 150 nm bandwidth range are less than 1.53 dB and −18.06 dB, respectively. These theoretical results indicate that the proposed mode MUX/DeMUX based on the inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler has an ultra-wide operating bandwidth of greater than 150 nm. It can also be noted from Fig. 4 that there is some power unbalance in the transmission spectra of the simulated results. In this study, we did not include the constraint functions in the optimization process. The constraint functions could be included in the algorithm to achieve a better power balance.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. The transmission spectra of the optimized mode MUX/DeMUX for input the TE0 and TE1 modes.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Fabrication and performance characterizations

The optimized device was fabricated on the SOI platform using two-step etching processes to form the grating couplers and the silicon waveguides, respectively. The TE-type grating couplers with a depth of 70 nm were first fabricated using the electron beam lithography (EBL) lithography and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching, followed by a second round of EBL and ICP to produce the core waveguides with a depth of 220 nm. Finally, a 1 µm-thick top cladding layer was deposited using the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The SOI wafer used in this work has a bottom cladding layer thickness of 3 µm. Microscope images of the fabricated device and a referenced waveguide used for normalization are shown in Fig. 5(a). A back-to-back connection of two identical mode MUX/DeMUXs was used to build an MDM-Link, as shown in Fig. 5(b). SEM images of the fabricated mode MUX/DeMUX and the functional region are shown in Figs. 5(c) and 5(d), respectively. As shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b), when the TE0 mode is launched from the port ITE0, it propagates along the upper bus waveguide and is directly output from the port OTE0. When the TE0 mode is launched from port ITE1, it propagates along the lower branch waveguide and is converted into the TE1 mode via the functional region of the mode MUX. And then this TE1 mode is transmitted to the functional region of the mode DeMUX and converted back to the TE0 mode, finally being output from the port OTE1.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. (a) Microscope image of the fabricated chip. (b) SEM image of the fabricated MDM-Link. (c) SEM picture of the mode MUX based on inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler. (d) Zoom-in image of the functional region.

Download Full Size | PDF

The performance of the fabricated MDM-Link was tested using a self-built vertical coupling test system for silicon-based photonic integrated circuits. The testing system consists of an optical link, an observation system, and an adjustment system. The optical link includes a tunable laser source with an operating wavelength range from 1490 nm to 1640 nm (Agilent 81640B), a polarization controller, and a photodetector. The observation system includes horizontal and vertical cameras and their corresponding displays. The adjustment system includes two six-dimensional manual tuning stages on both sides and a specimen stage in the middle for placing the chip.

The measured and simulated transmission spectra of the MDM-Link as a function of the operating wavelength are shown in Fig. 6. When the optical signal is input from the port ITE0, the measured insertion loss and crosstalk at the center wavelength of 1550 nm are 2.75 dB and −13.39 dB, respectively, and the 3-dB bandwidth is 116 nm. The crosstalk is less than −10.71 dB within a 138 nm range. As shown in Fig. 6(a), the experimental output power at the port OTE1 is lower than that in theoretical simulations. The reason for this phenomenon is that the theoretical simulations did not account for the propagation losses within the MDM-Link, whereas in practice, there are propagation losses. This leads to a lower output power at the port OTE1 compared to the theoretical simulations. When the optical signal is input from the port ITE1, the measured insertion loss and crosstalk at the center wavelength are 1.68 dB and −18.33 dB, respectively, and the 3-dB bandwidth covers the 138-nm wavelength range from 1500 nm to 1638 nm, with the corresponding crosstalk less than −12.11 dB. Compared with the theoretical results, the measured insertion losses at the center wavelength of the two modes show some degree of degradation, increasing by 1.01 dB and 0.56 dB, respectively. The reasons for this performance degradation include the fact that the theoretical simulation results did not include the propagation losses; the roughness of the sidewalls of the fabricated waveguides and the inherent waveguide propagation losses in the experimental samples caused extra losses. Although the fabrication errors can cause performance degradation, the 3-dB bandwidth of 116 nm and 138 nm demonstrated by the experimental testing confirms that our proposed mode MUX/DeMUX based on the inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler can achieve ultra-wide operating bandwidths.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Measured and simulated transmission spectra of the fabricated MDM-Link based on inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler, when the light is launched at (a) Port ITE0 and (b) Port ITE1.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have proposed, inverse-designed, fabricated, and measured a broadband and high-integration mode MUX/DeMUX based on a functional region assisted counter-tapered coupler. With the joint use of DBS algorithm and 3D-FV-FDTD method, we have obtained a square subunit functional region with a size of only 4 µm × 800 nm through inverse design. Benefitting from the efficient guidance of the functional region for mode evolution, the overall size of the proposed mode MUX/DeMUX has been optimized to be only 4 × 2.2 µm2. The theoretical results show that within a bandwidth range of 150 nm, the insertion loss and crosstalk of the TE0 mode are less than 1.54 dB and −10.89 dB, respectively, while those of the TE1 mode are less than 1.53 dB and −18.06 dB, respectively. The MDM-Link, containing a pair of back-to-back mode MUX/DeMUX, has been fabricated on the SOI platform. The insertion losses of the two modes at the central wavelength have been measured to be 2.75 dB and 1.68 dB, respectively, and the crosstalks have been tested to be −13.39 dB and −18.33 dB, respectively. The 3-dB bandwidths have been measured to be 116 nm and 138 nm, respectively. Theoretical and experimental results indicate that the proposed mode MUX/DeMUX has both ultra-small size and ultra-wide operating bandwidth, and can expand the number of handling modes through cascading. We believe that the proposed structure has the potential to be applied to on-chip MDM systems, realizing high-performance mode multiplexing and demultiplexing, and providing feasible key components for future hybrid WDM-MDM systems.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11904178, 62275128); State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China (2023GZKF015); The Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. R. Won and M. Paniccia, “Integrating silicon photonics,” Nat. Photonics 4(8), 498–499 (2010). [CrossRef]  

2. S. Y. Siew, B. Li, F. Gao, H. Y. Zheng, W. Zhang, P. Guo, S. W. Xie, A. Song, B. Dong, L. W. Luo, C. Li, X. Luo, and G.-Q. Lo, “Review of silicon photonics technology and platform development,” J. Lightwave Technol. 39(13), 4374–4389 (2021). [CrossRef]  

3. M. U. Khan, Y. Xing, Y. Ye, and W. Bogaerts, “Photonic integrated circuit Design in a foundry plus fabless ecosystem,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron. 25(5), 1–14 (2019). [CrossRef]  

4. Y. Su, Y. Zhang, C. Qiu, X. Guo, and L. Sun, “Silicon photonic platform for passive waveguide devices materials, fabrication, and applications,” Adv. Mater. Technol. 5(8), 1901153 (2020). [CrossRef]  

5. W. Bogaerts and L. Chrostowski, “Silicon photonics circuit design: methods, tools and challenges,” Laser Photonics Rev. 12(4), 1700237 (2018). [CrossRef]  

6. X. Wu, C. Huang, K. Xu, C. Shu, and H. Tsang, “Mode-division multiplexing for silicon photonic network-on-chip,” J. Lightwave Technol. 35(15), 3223–3228 (2017). [CrossRef]  

7. S. N. Khonina, N. L. Kazanskiy, M. A. Butt, and S. V. Karpeev, “Optical multiplexing techniques and their marriage for on-chip and optical fiber communication: a review,” Opto-Electron. Adv. 5(8), 210127 (2022). [CrossRef]  

8. Y. Shi, Y. Zhang, Y. Wan, Y. Yu, Y. Zhang, X. Hu, X. Xiao, H. Xu, and B. Pan, “Silicon photonics for high-capacity data communications. Photonics Research,” Photonics Res. 10(9), A106–A134 (2022). [CrossRef]  

9. H. Xu, D. Dai, and Y. Shi, “Silicon integrated nanophotonic devices for on-chip multi-mode interconnects,” Appl. Sci. 10(18), 6365 (2020). [CrossRef]  

10. G. Zhou, Y. Guo, L. Lu, J. Chen, and L. Zhou, “Silicon reconfigurable mode-selective modulation for on-chip mode-multiplexed photonic systems,” Opt. Lett. 46(5), 1145–1148 (2021). [CrossRef]  

11. X. Yi, C. Li, W. Zhao, L. Zhang, Y. Shi, and D. Dai, “On-chip mode-selective manipulation based on the modal-field redistribution assisted with subwavelength grating structures,” Nanophotonics 12(9), 1809–1821 (2023). [CrossRef]  

12. B. Stern, X. Zhu, C. P. Chen, L. D. Tzuang, J. Cardenas, K. Bergman, and M. Lipson, “On-chip mode-division multiplexing switch,” Optica 2(6), 530–535 (2015). [CrossRef]  

13. X. Han, H. Xiao, G. Ren, Y. Jiang, A. Mitchell, J. Yang, and Y. Tian, “On-chip non-blocking optical mode exchanger for mode-division multiplexing interconnection networks,” J. Lightwave Technol. 39(20), 6563–6571 (2021). [CrossRef]  

14. S. Mao, J. Hu, H. Zhang, and W. Jiang, “Optimal design and experimental demonstration of a silicon-based ultra-compact mode splitter,” Opt. Lett. 47(16), 4167–4170 (2022). [CrossRef]  

15. L.-W. Luo, N. Ophir, C. P. Chen, L. H. Gabrielli, C. B. Poitras, K. Bergmen, and M. Lipson, “WDM-compatible mode-division multiplexing on a silicon chip,” Nat. Commun. 5(1), 3069 (2014). [CrossRef]  

16. P. Bruna, Z. Mohammed, J. E. Villegas, and M. Rasras, “Ultra-compact ultra-broadband two-mode transverse-electric based SWG multiplexer demonstrated at 64 Gbps,” J. Lightwave Technol. 41(16), 5412–5417 (2023). [CrossRef]  

17. Q. Wang, Y. He, H. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Shen, Y. Zhang, and Y. Su, “On-chip mode division (de)multiplexer for multi-band operation,” Opt. Express 30(13), 22779–22787 (2022). [CrossRef]  

18. D. Garcia-Rodriguez, J. L. Corral, and R. Llorente, “Design of asymmetrical directional couplers on ridge and strip SOI technology with high-dimensional variation tolerance,” Opt. Lett. 43(11), 2491–2494 (2018). [CrossRef]  

19. H. Shu, B. Shen, Q. Deng, M. Jin, X. Wang, and Z. Zhou, “A design guideline for mode (DE) multiplexer based on integrated tapered asymmetric directional coupler,” IEEE Photonics J. 11(5), 1–12 (2019). [CrossRef]  

20. C. Sun, Y. Yu, M. Ye, G. Chen, and X. Zhang, “An ultra-low crosstalk and broadband two-mode (de) multiplexer based on adiabatic couplers,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 38494 (2016). [CrossRef]  

21. J. Xing, Z. Li, X. Xiao, J. Yu, and Y. Yu, “Two-mode multiplexer and demultiplexer based on adiabatic couplers,” Opt. Lett. 38(17), 3468–3470 (2013). [CrossRef]  

22. Z. Wang, C. Yao, Y. Zhang, and Y. Su, “Compact silicon three-mode multiplexer by refractive-index manipulation on a multi-mode interferometer,” Opt. Express 29(9), 13899–13907 (2021). [CrossRef]  

23. T. Uematsu, Y. Ishizaka, Y. Kawaguchi, K. Saitoh, and M. Koshiba, “Design of a compact two-mode multi demultiplexer consisting of multimode interference waveguides and a wavelength-insensitive phase shifter for mode-division,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(15), 2421–2426 (2012). [CrossRef]  

24. W. Chen, P. Wang, T. Yang, G. Wang, T. Dai, Y. Zhang, L. Zhou, X. Jiang, and J. Yang, “Silicon three-mode (de)multiplexer based on cascaded asymmetric Y junctions,” Opt. Lett. 41(12), 2851–2854 (2016). [CrossRef]  

25. X. Guo, Y. Liu, J. Du, Q. Song, and K. Xu, “Scalable and compact silicon mode multiplexer via tilt waveguide junctions with shallow etched slots,” J. Lightwave Technol. 40(14), 4682–4688 (2022). [CrossRef]  

26. D. Gostimirovic and W. N. Ye, “Compact silicon-photonic mode-division (de)multiplexer using waveguide-wrapped microdisk resonators,” Opt. Lett. 46(2), 388–391 (2021). [CrossRef]  

27. H. Jia, X. Fu, T. Zhou, L. Zhang, S. Yang, and L. Yang, “Mode-selective modulation by silicon microring resonators and mode multiplexers for on-chip optical interconnect,” Opt. Lett. 27(3), 2915–2925 (2019). [CrossRef]  

28. C. Li, M. Zhang, H. Xu, Y. Tan, Y. Shi, and D. Dai, “Subwavelength silicon photonics for on-chip mode-manipulation,” PhotoniX 2(1), 11–35 (2021). [CrossRef]  

29. X. Wang, H. Yu, Q. Zhang, Z. Fu, P. Xia, Q. Huang, N. Ning, Z. Wei, Y. Wang, X. Jiang, and J. Yang, “Ultra-compact silicon mode (de)multiplexer based on directional couplers with subwavelength sidewall corrugations,” Opt. Lett. 47(9), 2198–2201 (2022). [CrossRef]  

30. Y. Liu, Z. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Wang, X. Guo, D. Li, Y. Yao, Q. Song, J. Du, Z. He, and K. Xu, “Ultra-compact mode-division multiplexed photonic integrated circuit for dual polarizations,” J. Lightwave Technol. 39(18), 5925–5932 (2021). [CrossRef]  

31. Y. Liu, K. Xu, S. Wang, W. Shen, H. Xie, Y. Wang, S. Xiao, Y. Yao, J. Du, Z. He, and Q. Song, “Arbitrarily routed mode-division multiplexed photonic circuits for dense integration,” Nat. Commun. 10(1), 3263 (2019). [CrossRef]  

32. J. Wang, S. He, and D. Dai, “On-chip silicon 8-channel hybrid (de)multiplexer enabling simultaneous mode- and polarization-division-multiplexing,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8(2), L18–L22 (2014). [CrossRef]  

33. I. Cristiani, C. Lacava, G. Rademacher, et al., “Roadmap on multimode photonics,” J. Opt. 24(8), 083001 (2022). [CrossRef]  

34. Y. Ding, J. Xu, F. Da Ros, B. Huang, H. Ou, and C. Peucheret, “On-chip two-mode division multiplexing using tapered directional coupler-based mode multiplexer and demultiplexer,” Opt. Express 21(8), 10376–10382 (2013). [CrossRef]  

35. J. Wang, Y. Xuan, M. Qi, H. Huang, Y. Li, M. Li, X. Chen, Z. Sheng, A. Wu, W. Li, X. Wang, S. Zou, and F. Gan, “Broadband and fabrication tolerant on-chip scalable mode-division multiplexing based on mode-evolution counter-tapered couplers,” Opt. Lett. 40(9), 1956–1959 (2015). [CrossRef]  

36. C. Li and D. Dai, “Low-loss and low-crosstalk multi-channel mode (de)multiplexer with ultrathin silicon waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 42(12), 2370–2373 (2017). [CrossRef]  

37. S. Molesky, Z. Lin, A. Y. Piggott, W. Jin, J. Vucković, and A. W. Rodriguez, “Inverse design in nanophotonics,” Nat. Photonics 12(11), 659–670 (2018). [CrossRef]  

38. H. Qi, Z. Du, X. Hu, J. Yang, S. Chu, and Q. Gong, “High performance integrated photonic circuit based on inverse design method,” Opto-Electron. Adv. 5(10), 210061 (2022). [CrossRef]  

39. W. Chang, L. Lu, X. Ren, D. Li, Z. Pan, M. Cheng, D. Liu, and M. Zhang, “Ultra-compact mode (de) multiplexer based on subwavelength asymmetric Y-junction,” Opt. Express 26(7), 8162–8170 (2018). [CrossRef]  

40. Z. Chen, T. Lin, and H. Lv, “Ultra-compact broadband in-line mode converter based on a width-modulated silicon waveguide,” IEEE Photonics J. 13(2), 1–7 (2021). [CrossRef]  

41. J. C. C. Mak, C. Sideris, J. Jeong, A. Hajimiri, and J. K. S. Poon, “Binary particle swarm optimized 2 × 2 power splitters in a standard foundry silicon photonic platform,” Opt. Lett. 41(16), 3868–3871 (2016). [CrossRef]  

42. G. Zhang, D. X. Xu, Y. Grinberg, and O. Liboiron-Ladouceur, “Topological inverse design of nanophotonic devices with energy constraint,” Opt. Express 29(8), 12681–12695 (2021). [CrossRef]  

43. A. Y. Piggott, E. Y. Ma, L. Su, G. H. Ahn, N. V. Sapra, D. Vercruysse, and J. Vuckovic, “Inverse-designed photonics for semiconductor foundries,” ACS Photonics 7(3), 569–575 (2020). [CrossRef]  

44. K. Y. Yang, C. Shirpurkar, A. D. White, et al., “Multi-dimensional data transmission using inverse-designed silicon photonics and microcombs,” Nat. Commun. 13(1), 7862 (2022). [CrossRef]  

45. C. Shang, J. Yang, A. M. Hammond, Z. Chen, M. Chen, Z. Lin, S. G. Johnson, and C. Wang, “Inverse-designed lithium niobate nanophotonics,” ACS Photonics 10, 1019–1026 (2023). [CrossRef]  

46. H. Zhou, Y. Wang, X. Gao, D. Gao, J. Dong, D. Huang, F. Li, P. A. Wai, and X. Zhang, “Dielectric metasurfaces enabled ultradensely integrated multidimensional optical system,” Laser Photonics Rev. 16(4), 2100521 (2022). [CrossRef]  

47. W. Chen, H. Li, B. Zhang, P. Wang, S. Dai, Y. Liu, J. Li, Y. Li, Q. Fu, T. Dai, H. Yu, and J. Yang, “Silicon mode (de)multiplexer based on cascaded particle-swarm-optimized counter-tapered couplers,” IEEE Photonics J. 13(6), 1–10 (2021). [CrossRef]  

48. K. Kojima, B. Wang, U. Kamilov, T. Koike-Akino, and K. Parsons, “Acceleration of FDTD-based inverse design using a neural network approach,” in Integrated Photonics Research, Silicon and Nanophotonics (Optical Society of America, 2017), paper ITu1A.4.

49. H. Chen, H. Jia, T. Wang, and J. Yang, “A gradient-oriented binary search method for photonic device design,” J. Lightwave Technol. 39(8), 2407–2412 (2021). [CrossRef]  

50. T. Fujisawa and K. Saitoh, “Bayesian direct-binary-search algorithm for the efficient design of mosaic-based power splitters,” OSA Continuum 4(4), 1258–1270 (2021). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed mode MUX/DeMUX based on an inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Structure and parameters of inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler based mode MUX/DeMUX. (b) The relationship between the transmission (left y-axis) and FOM (right y-axis) with respect to number of iterations.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Propagation Hy fields of the optimized mode MUX/DeMUX based on inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler when (a) TE0 mode and (b) TE1 mode are injected at the port I, respectively.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The transmission spectra of the optimized mode MUX/DeMUX for input the TE0 and TE1 modes.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. (a) Microscope image of the fabricated chip. (b) SEM image of the fabricated MDM-Link. (c) SEM picture of the mode MUX based on inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler. (d) Zoom-in image of the functional region.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Measured and simulated transmission spectra of the fabricated MDM-Link based on inverse-designed counter-tapered coupler, when the light is launched at (a) Port ITE0 and (b) Port ITE1.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.