Add to BibSonomyAbstract
We provide a CPU-time vs. accuracy comparison as a building-block for choosing among the multitude of numerical methods for wave equation solution (collocation-related, integral equation and shooting). Relative performance depends on both profile and guidance parameter, V. Shooting extrapolation and boundary-matching forms provide refinements for maximum efficiency.
© 1989 Optical Society of America
PDF ArticleMore Like This
Comparison of Numerical Studies on Active Rectangular Waveguide Couplers by Vector, Scalar Finite Element, and Effective Refractive Index Methods
Kyohei Sakuda and Koichi Hayakawa
SC2 Numerical Simulation and Analysis in Guided-Wave Optics and Opto-Electronics (GWOE) 1989
Intensity-Dependent Few-Mode Lightguide Interferometry
R. J. Black, A. Hénault, L. Gagnon, F. Gonthier, and S. Lacroix
THB13 Nonlinear Guided-Wave Phenomena (NP) 1989
Comparison of various numerical methods for ridge waveguides
M. Nisa Khan, Ram Piyaket, and Anand Gopinath
TuE6 Integrated Photonics Research (IPR) 1990