Abstract
The dynamics of cavity polaritons in microcavities is presently debated, in particular whether or not the so-called Boser action is responsible for the observed laser-like emission from polaritons with zero in-plane wave vector (k‖ ~ 0), shown in the far-field image in the inset of Fig. (a).[1,2] This action relies on the bosonic nature of low-density polaritons enhancing scattering processes stimulated by the final-state polariton population nLP. A particular issue is if this should be distinguished from a parametric process, that has provided large pulse amplification under angle-resonant pumping conditions for polariton-polariton scattering on the lower-polariton branch.[3] In this work we time resolve the k‖ ~ 0 self-stimulated emission under similar excitation conditions (with a single pulse - see inset in Fig. (b)) in microcavities (MC) with differently broadened single quantum wells (QW). One sample (HMC in (b)) is homogeneously broadened with bare QW linewidth δ = 120 μeV < δMC = 260 μeV (the bare MC linewidth) and one sample (IMC in (a)) is inhomogeneously broadened with δ = 1.0 meV ≫δMC.[4] In contrast to the HMC, the self-stimulated emission transient in the IMC is much slower and the emission maximum does not shift to earlier times with increasing excitation density, if coherences should play a dominant role in the dynamical response, it should result in faster dynamics for increasing inhomogeneous broadening T, because of the well-known shortening of the dephasing time . We therefore conclude that there is a dominant contribution to the low-density polariton dynamics in microcavities from population effects under angle-resonant excitation conditions, which is in agreement with a rate-equation model with the bosonic enhancement factor (1+nLP) (not shown). [5] However, the strong emission is caused by the fast build-up of a coherent k‖ ~ 0 polariton population resulting in the emitting polarization. Thus, the emission process is like in a parametric process with nLP≫1 and therefore indistinguishable from the final-state stimulated polariton dynamics.
© 2000 IEEE
PDF ArticleMore Like This
John Erland, Wolfgang Langbein, Jacob R. Jensen, and Jørn M. Hvam
QThQ5 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference (CLEO:FS) 2000
Xudong Fan, Hailim Wang, H. Q. Hou, and B. E. Hammons
QMC5 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference (CLEO:FS) 1997
F. Tassone, R. Huang, and Y. Yamamoto
QMC6 International Quantum Electronics Conference (IQEC) 1998