Fatigue Effects in Automated Perimetry

Chris A. Johnson; Craig W. Adams; Richard A. Lewis; John L. Keltner

doi:10.1364/NAVS.1987.WB2

Topical Meeting on Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System
Technical Digest Series (Optica Publishing Group, 1987),
paper WB2
•https://doi.org/10.1364/NAVS.1987.WB2

Fatigue Effects in Automated Perimetry

Chris A. Johnson, Craig W. Adams, Richard A. Lewis, and John L. Keltner

Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System 1987

Incline Village, Nevada United States
26–28 January 1987
ISBN:

From the session
Session 8 (WB)

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
C. A. Johnson, C. W. Adams, R. A. Lewis, and J. L. Keltner, "Fatigue Effects in Automated Perimetry," in Topical Meeting on Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System, Technical Digest Series (Optica Publishing Group, 1987), paper WB2.

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

Automated static perimetry has improved the detection and differential diagnostic capabilities of clinical visual field testing. However, automated perimetry is more demanding and less flexible than manual visual field testing. The increased effort and attentional requirements of automated perimetry may adversely influence the sensitivity and reliability of visual field testing.

PDF Article

More Like This

Automated Pupil Perimetry

Randy H. Kardon, Chris Haupert, and H. Stanley Thompson
MB5 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1990

Automated Kinetic Perimetry: An Efficient Method of Evaluating Peripheral Visual Field Loss

Chris A. Johnson, John L. Keltner, and Richard A. Lewis
WC3 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1986

Physiological statokinetic dissociation by automated perimetry

C. Hudson, J. M. Wild, and M. K. Hussey
SuA1 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1992

Previous Article Next Article