Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Detection and Discrimination of Mirror-Image Letter Pairs in Central and Peripheral Vision

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Loss of central visual field function seriously disrupts reading performance (Legge et al., 1985; Cummings et al., 1985). Moreover, after magnification to compensate for the acuity loss and even after, prolonged training, reading speed in individuals with such losses rarely approaches that of normally- sighted individuals using central vision. Although it might be argued that subtle peripheral field losses that are undetected in clinical perimetry might limit reading performance, it seems unlikely that such an explanation would, by itself, be sufficient. For example, Turano and Rubin (1988) have noted deficient reading performance in the peripheral retina of those with normal function in both central and peripheral retina. Hence it seems more likely that reading deficits with central visual losses are due to differences in visual capabilities between central and peripheral visual field.

© 1992 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Contrast Discrimination in Observers with Vision Loss

Ronald A. Schuchard
MB4 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1992

Reading Performance with Peripheral Viewing Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation

Kathleen Turano and Gary S. Rubin
ThD2 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1988

Temporal Aspects of Letter Identification in the Peripheral Visual Field

William Seiple, Yelizaveta Shnayder, Alexander Kizhnerman, Karen Holopigian, and Janet Szlyk
SaC.4 Vision Science and its Applications (VSIA) 1998

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.