Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Changes in the peripheral pattern electroretinogram and visually evoked cortical potential with refractive error

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

We simultaneously recorded PERG and VECP responses from the visual periphery generated by an alternating checkerboard (0.3 checks, 89% contrast) under both steady state and transient conditions. Subjects viewed the stimulus through trial lenses of varying powers. The best-fit straight lines through the right sides of the amplitude versus dioptric-error plots had a slope of about 0.15 V/diopter for both the PERG and the VECP. These slopes can be compared to data from the center,1 where the PERG slope had about the same fall-off rate, but where the VECP slope was much greater at about 2.0 V/diopter. Thus, we find that the peripheral VECP is much less sensitive to blur than is the central VECP. This is consistent with results from psychophysical acuity experiments. When a stimulus to the fovea is blurred, acuity decreases very rapidly. On the other hand, in the periphery it does not matter whether refractive error is present or nob acuity is the same.2 This peripheral insensitivity to blur is now shown in the VECP.

© 1990 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Cortical Potentials Evoked by Short Wavelength Patterned Light

Jeff Rabin, Anthony J. Adams, Gene Switkes, Marilyn Schneck, and Ken Huie
ThA1 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1990

Evoked Potential Assessment of Cortical Adaptation

William Seiple, Mark Kupersmith, Jeremiah Nelson, and Ronald Carr
MB4 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1987

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.