Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Why is chromatic sensitivity greater than luminance sensitivity?

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

At ARVO 1992, we reported that when detection thresholds for luminance and red–green chromatic spots are expressed in cone contrast energy (the space–time integral of the squared contrast produced in either the L or M cones), sensitivity for the optimal chromatic spot was 5–8× higher than for the optimal luminance spot. For an ideal observer of chromatic signals, the noise level in P ganglion cells would not be limiting, suggesting that limits are imposed at subsequent stages. The large chromatic sensitivity advantage could result from (a) lower detection uncertainty in the red–green mechanism; (b) common mode rejection (removal of correlated noise) in the opponent pathway; (c) reductions in luminance gain, relative to chromatic gain, at cortical levels; or (d) greater spatial and temporal integration in the chromatic pathway.

© 1992 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Cone contrast comparison of luminance and chromatic sensitivities for movement, flicker, and flashes

Rhea T. Eskew, Charles F. Stromeyer, and Richard E. Kronauer
WR2 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1990

The Constancy of Equiluminant Red-Green Thresholds Examined in Two Color Spaces

Rhea T. Eskew, Charles F. Stromeyer, and Richard E. Kronauer
SaC2 Advances in Color Vision (ACV) 1992

Against a “covariance metric” for motion perception: chromatic and luminance information do not combine

Andrei Gorea, Ilona Kovacs, and Thomas V. Papathomas
FOO1 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1992

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.