Open Access
Add to BibSonomyAbstract
The feature of a multicore fiber with one-ring structure is theoretically analyzed and experimentally demonstrated. The one-ring structure overcomes the issues of the hexagonal close-pack structure. The possibility of 10-core fiber with Aeff of 110 μm2 and 12-core fiber with Aeff of 80 μm2 is theoretically presented. The fabricated 12-core fibers based on the simulation results realized Aeff of 80 μm2 and crosstalk less than −40 dB at 1550 nm after 100-km propagation. The MCF with the number of core larger than seven and the small crosstalk was demonstrated for the first time.
©2012 Optical Society of America
1. Introduction
Space division multiplexing (SDM) is expected as a breakthrough technology against capacity crunch of optical transmission system over a single-mode fiber. Multicore fibers (MCFs) have been developed for a transmission fiber of SDM system [1–9] and the results of transmission experiments had been reported [3,7,10–12]. Almost all the reported MCFs were seven cores with hexagonal close-packed structure (HCPS). The recently reported 19-core fiber was also based on the HCPS [7]. The HCPS has some issues on effective crosstalk [3] and flexibility of the numbers of cores [5]. In addition, the trench-assisted structure, which is recognized as an indispensable technique to suppress inter-core crosstalk, causes another issue on the control of cutoff wavelength [1,4]. We have proposed a two-pitch structure (TPS) as a solution for these issues [5,6].
Recently, the transmission experiment with the record capacity of 1.01-Pb/s over a 12-core fiber has been reported [11]. The 12-core fiber employed novel core arrangement called one-ring structure (ORS). In this paper, the characteristics of the ORS-MCF are presented. After the explanation of the feature of the ORS, the optimization of the ORS by the numerical simulation is presented. The simulation results are confirmed by the characteristics of fabricated ORS-MCFs with 12 cores.
2. Feature of one-ring structure
Figure 1 shows schematic diagram of proposed MCFs. Though the HCPS has been the most popular structure, the HCPS has three issues to be concerned.
The TPS is a solution for the second and the third issues. However, the pitch of TPS is still constrained by the cutoff wavelength of a center core [6].
The ORS is free from the 1st issue thank to elimination of a center core. The elimination of a center core is helpful to overcome the second issue related to crosstalk. In the case of the HCPS, the center core has six adjacent cores and the outer cores have three or four adjacent cores. The cores of the ORS have only two adjacent cores. Here, we assume the following conditions:
- 1. All cores carry equal signal power.
- 2. Crosstalk between two cores is equal for all combination of adjacent cores.
- 3. Crosstalk between two cores is small enough.
Table 1 summarizes ΔXT of MCFs with various structures. The ΔXT of the HCPS ranges from 4.8 dB to 7.8 dB. In the case of TPS, The ΔXT of the inner core is 9.5 dB, which is largest value in Table 1. However, the 9.5-dB ΔXT is negligible because the XT between an inner core and an outer core is 30 dB smaller than that between outer cores [5]. The ΔXT of the ORS is 3.0 dB for all cores. Accordingly, we can conclude that the ORS can overcome the second issue.
Table 1. ΔXT for various structures
The third issue is related to the cladding diameter (Dc) limitation related to mechanical reliability. We have proposed 225 μm as an upper limit of the Dc [5]. Figure 2 illustrates the allowable number of core as a function of Dc for HCPS, where core pitch Λ = 40 μm [13] and cladding thickness (Tc) = 30 μm [2]. The Λ and the Tc are required to realize 100-km XT of −50 dB at 1550 nm at bending radius of 500 mm, effective area (Aeff) of 80 μm2 at 1550 nm without the excess loss of outer cores. XTworst is estimated to be about −42 dB. The Dc of 19-cores HCPS is estimated to be 220 μm. The ORS can flexibly arrange the number of cores in accordance with an allowed Dc as demonstrated in the following chapter.
Fig. 2 Cladding diameter dependence of maximum number of cores for HCPS: λc = 1.53 μm, Aeff at 1550 nm = 80 μm2 and 100-km XT at 1550 nm = −50 dB at bending radius of 500 mm. Core pitch Λ = 40 μm. Cladding thickness Tc = 30 μm.
3. Simulation results
We have simulated the expected Dc of ORS-MCF. Full-vector finite element method was used for the simulation [14]. XT with homogeneous cores was simulated with power-coupling coefficient h given by Eq. (25) in Ref [15]. and fiber length L.
where κ is the coupling coefficient between neighboring cores, R is bending radius, β is the propagation constant of cores and Λ is core pitch. We used R = 155 mm for the simulation of ORS-MCF regarding our spool size. Note that the crosstalk of the HCPS shown in the previous chapter was estimated at the bending radius of 500 mm. XT is improved by 5 dB by changing the bending radius from 500 mm to 155 mm. The XTworst of the HCPS at the bending radius of 155 mm is estimated to be −47 dB.A trench-assisted structure shown in Fig. 3 was employed for the refractive index of core to suppress XT [1]. r2/r1 = 2.0, w/r1 = 1.2, Δ2 = 0% and Δ3 = −0.7%. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) represent the simulation results for different Aeff range: Fig. 4(a) shows 80-μm2 range and Fig. 4(b) shows 110-μm2 range. A cutoff wavelength (λc) was defined as the wavelength where the confinement loss of the LP11 mode was 1 dB/m. The effective cable cutoff wavelength of single-mode fibers is defined as the wavelength where the LP11 mode undergoes 19.3-dB attenuation after 22-m propagation [16]. The LP11-mode confinement loss of 1 dB/m means that LP11 mode suffers 22-dB attenuation after 22-m propagation and is good indicator of the effective cutoff wavelength. Dashed lines and dotted lines are contour line of Aeff and λc, respectively. Colored solid lines represent core pitch Λ contour that realizes XT of −50 dB at 1550 nm after 100-km propagation, which XT is equivalent to XTworst of −47 dB for the ORS.
Fig. 4 Structural parameter dependence of Aeff, cutoff wavelength and Λ-50.: (a) Results on 80-μm2 Aeff range. (b) Results on 110-μm2 Aeff range.
Figure 4(a) indicates that Λ of 36.5 μm is required to realize an ORS-MCF with Aeff of 80 μm2 and cutoff wavelength of 1530 nm. Figure 5 shows the allowable number of cores for ORS and HCPS as a function of Dc, where XTworst = −47 dB. Λ = 36.5 μm for the ORS. Λ = 40 μm for the HCPS. Tc = 30 μm for both the structures. The ORS allows us to increase the number of cores according to allowed cladding diameter. We can arrange 12 cores in a cladding of 201-μm diameter by using the ORS. In the case of 12-core fiber, the core can also be arranged on a hexagon: six core on tops and six cores on the middle of sides. The Dc with hexagonal structure is 206 μm, which is slightly larger than that of circular structure and is still smaller than that of the 19-core HCPS. We can select an appropriate structure in consideration of fabrication process.
Fig. 5 Cladding diameter dependence of maximum number of cores for ORS and HCPS: λc = 1.53 μm, Aeff at 1550 nm = 80 μm2 and 100-km XTworst at 1550nm = −47 dB at bending radius of 155 mm. Cladding thickness Tc = 30 μm. Λ = 36.5 μm for ORS. Λ = 40 μm for HCPS.
We can derive Λ of 41 μm for 100-km XT of −50 dB, Aeff of 110 μm2 and cutoff wavelength of 1530 nm from Fig. 4(b). 10 cores can be arranged in a cladding of 213-μm diameter including 40-μm Tc [4]. To achieve the same XTworst of −47 dB and Aeff of 100 μm2, Λ is 46.0 μm for HCPS [13] and 47.4 μm for TPS [5]. Small core pitch design is allowed by using the ORS. The cladding diameter of 10-core TPS and 19-core HCPS are estimated to be 219 μm and 264 μm, respectively. The ORS is effective to realize large Aeff and low crosstalk MCF with comparatively small cladding diameter.
4. Measurement results of fabricated fibers
We have fabricated ORS-MCFs based on the simulation. Figure 6 shows cross sectional view of a fabricated ORS-MCF with 12 cores that are arranged on the hexagon. The arrangement of 12 cores on the hexagon is the same with outermost cores of 19-core HCPS as shown in Fig. 1. Accordingly, we could fabricate the 12-core fiber by using the stack and draw method, with which rods are assembled on the HCPS. Two preforms (A, B) were prepared for this experiment. Table 2 summarizes structural parameters and average characteristics of fabricated ORS-MCFs. The alphabet of a fiber ID indicates a preform ID. Λ = about 37 μm and Dc = about 225 μm for the fibers. The Dcs were larger than expected value of 201 μm, which is presented in the previous section, because the Tc of about 39 μm was larger than the minimum required value of 30 μm. Averaged attenuation at 1550 nm was about 0.20 dB/km. Aeff was about 80 μm2 in average. Cutoff wavelength was smaller than 1530 nm for all cores. Table 3 shows measurement results of the fabricated fibers. Measured λc and Aeff were varied within narrow limit: the fabricated fibers had quasi-homogeneous structure. Figure 7 shows estimated 100-km XT between cores. A 100-km XT was evaluated from measured crosstalk with each length based on length dependence of the XT [17]. XT was measured on a fiber wound on a spool with diameter of 310 mm. Averaged power over 4000 points sampled at 20 msec interval was used for XT calculation. Power variation over the averaging period was 6 dB at a maximum. The 100-km XT at 1550 nm ranged from −41 dB to −48 dB. The average XT at 1550 nm was −45 dB. The 100-km XTworst was estimated to be less than about −40 dB at 1550 nm and about −30 dB at 1625 nm.
Table 2. Structural parameters and average characteristics of fabricated MCFs
Table 3. Measurement results of fabricated MCFs
Figure 8 shows the relationship between 100-km XTworst and number of cores for single-mode MCFs(SM-MCFs) presented so far. The XTworst was estimated from reported XT with Eq. (1). The MCFs whose number of cores is larger than seven resulted in relatively large XTworst about −20 dB. The fabricated 12-core fibers with the ORS successfully increased the number of cores with the small XTworst of −40 dB at 1550 nm for the first time.
5. Conclusions
We have proposed a MCF whose cores are arranged on one ring. The characteristics of the proposed structure were theoretically analyzed and experimentally confirmed. The proposed MCF overcame three issues on the MCF with hexagonal close-packed structure. The simulation results indicated that the one-ring structure realizes 12-core fiber with Aeff of 80 μm2 and Dc of 201 μm and 10-core fiber with Aeff of 110 μm2 and Dc of 213 μm. We have fabricated 12-core fibers whose cores were arranged on a hexagon based on the simulation results. The fabricated 12-core fiber realized Aeff of 80 μm2 and 100-km worst crosstalk less than −40 dB at 1550 nm.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. H.Takara, Dr. A. Sano, Dr. H. Kubota, Dr. H. Kawakami, Dr. A. Matsuura, Dr. Y. Miyamoto, Dr. Y. Abe, Dr. H. Ono, Dr. K. Shikama, Dr. Y. Goto, and Dr. K. Tsujikawa of NTT Corporation and Prof. Morioka of Technical University of Denmark for helpful discussion and their encouragement. This work was partially supported by National Institute of Information and Communication Technology (NICT), Japan under “Research on Innovative Optical fiber Technology”.
References and links
1. K. Takenaga, Y. Arakawa, S. Tanigawa, N. Guan, S. Matsuo, K. Saitoh, and M. Koshiba, “Reduction of crosstalk by trench-assisted multi-core fiber,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2011), paper OWJ4.
2. T. Hayashi, T. Taru, O. Shimakawa, T. Sasaki, and E. Sasaoka, “Design and fabrication of ultra-low crosstalk and low-loss multi-core fiber,” Opt. Express 19(17), 16576–16592 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. B. Zhu, T. F. Taunay, M. Fishteyn, X. Liu, S. Chandrasekhar, M. F. Yan, J. M. Fini, E. M. Monberg, and F. V. Dimarcello, “112-Tb/s Space-division multiplexed DWDM transmission with 14-b/s/Hz aggregate spectral efficiency over a 76.8-km seven-core fiber,” Opt. Express 19(17), 16665–16671 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. K. Takenaga, Y. Arakawa, Y. Sasaki, S. Tanigawa, S. Matsuo, K. Saitoh, and M. Koshiba, “A large effective area multi-core fiber with an optimized cladding thickness,” Opt. Express 19(26), B543–B550 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. S. Matsuo, K. Takenaga, Y. Arakawa, Y. Sasaki, S. Taniagwa, K. Saitoh, and M. Koshiba, “Large-effective-area ten-core fiber with cladding diameter of about 200 μm,” Opt. Lett. 36(23), 4626–4628 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Y. Sasaki, K. Takenaga, Y. Arakawa, S. Tanigawa, S. Matsuo, K. Saitoh, and M. Koshiba, “Large-effective-area uncoupled 10-core fiber with two-pitch layout,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2012), paper OM2D.4.
7. J. Sakaguchi, B. J. Puttnam, W. Klaus, Y. Awaji, N. Wada, A. Kanno, T. Kawanishi, K. Imamura, H. Inaba, K. Mukasa, R. Sugizaki, T. Kobayashi, and M. Watanabe, “19-core fiber transmission of 19x100x172-Gb/s SDM-WDM-PDM-QPSK signal at 305 Tb/s,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2012), paper PDP5C.1.
8. T. Hayashi, T. Taru, O. Shimakawa, T. Sasaki, and E. Sasaoka, “Low-loss and large-Aeff multi-core fiber for SNR enhancement,” in European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication (ECOC) (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 2012), paper Mo.1.F.3.
9. K. Imamura, H. Inaba, K. Mukasa, and R. Sugizaki, “Multi core fiber with large Aeff of 140 μm2 and low crosstalk,” in European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication (ECOC) (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 2012), paper Mo.1.F.2.
10. H. Takara, H. Ono, Y. Abe, H. Masuda, K. Takenaga, S. Matsuo, H. Kubota, K. Shibahara, T. Kobayashi, and Y. Miaymoto, “1000-km 7-core fiber transmission of 10 x 96-Gb/s PDM-16QAM using Raman amplification with 6.5 W per fiber,” Opt. Express 20(9), 10100–10105 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. H. Takara, A. Sano, T. Kobayashi, H. Kubota, H. Kawakami, A. Matsuura, Y. Miyamoto, Y. Abe, H. Ono, K. Shikama, Y. Goto, K. Tsujikawa, Y. Sasaki, I. Ishida, K. Takenaga, S. Matsuo, K. Saitoh, M. Koshiba, and T. Morioka, “1.01-Pb/s (12 SMD/222 WDM 456 Gb/s) crosstalk-managed transmission with 91.4-b/s/Hz aggregate spectral efficiency,” in European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication (ECOC) (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 2012), paper Th.3.C.1.
12. H. Takahashi, T. Tsuritani, E. L. T. de Gabory, T. Ito, W. R. Peng, K. Igarashi, K. Takashima, Y. Kawaguchi, I. Morita, Y. Tsuchida, Y. Mimura, K. Maeda, T. Saito, K. Watanabe, K. Imamura, R. Sugizaki, and M. Suzuki, “First demonstration of MC-EDFA-repeatered SDM transmission of 40x128-Gbit/s PDM-QPSK signals per core over 6,160-km 7-core MCF,” in European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication (ECOC) (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 2012), paper Th.3.C.3.
13. K. Saitoh, M. Koshiba, K. Takenaga, and S. Matsuo, “Crosstalk and core density in uncoupled multi-core fibers,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(21), 1898–1901 (2012). [CrossRef]
14. K. Saitoh and M. Koshiba, “Full-vectorial imaginary-distance beam propagation method based on finite element scheme: Application to photonic crystal fibers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 38(7), 927–933 (2002). [CrossRef]
15. M. Koshiba, K. Saitoh, K. Takenaga, and S. Matsuo, “Analytical expression of average power-coupling coefficients for estimating intercore crosstalk in multicore fibers,” IEEE Photon. J. 4(5), 1987–1995 (2012). [CrossRef]
16. IEC Standard 60793–1-44, Measurement Methods and Test Procedures- Cutoff Wavelength (2011).
17. K. Takenaga, Y. Arakawa, S. Tanigawa, N. Guan, S. Matsuo, K. Saitoh, and M. Koshiba, “An investigation on crosstalk in multi-core fibers by introducing random fluctuation along longitudinal direction,” IEICE Trans. on Commun,” E94-B(2), 409–416 (2011).
