Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Experimental study and mechanism analysis of a pulsed laser cleaning aluminum alloy process

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A pulse laser with a wavelength of 1064 nm and a pulse width of 1 µs was used to experiment on the coating of a 2024 aluminum alloy surface. The removal performance of the pulse laser cleaning coating was explored by a single factor analysis and orthogonally conditions, and the effects of the laser power, scanning speed, and pulse frequency on the quality of laser coating removal were summarized. The mechanisms of pulse laser cleaning the coating were studied. The results show that the three parameters of the laser power, scanning speed, and pulse frequency have different effects on the quality of laser coating removal. Among them, with the increase of the scanning speed and pulse frequency, the quality of laser cleaning first increases and then decreases, respectively. With the increase in laser power, the quality of laser cleaning increases. A good laser cleaning quality can be achieved at the laser power of 16.5 W, a scanning speed of 600 mm/s, and a pulse frequency of 30 kHz. The laser cleaning coating involves a variety of mechanisms such as combustion, explosion, gasification, thermal vibration stripping, and laser plasma impact. The result can provide practical references for a better searching of the paint removal.

© 2024 Optica Publishing Group

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Study on the characteristics and mechanism of pulsed laser cleaning of polyacrylate resin coating on aluminum alloy substrates

H. C. Zhao, Y. L. Qiao, Q. Zhang, X. Du, Y. Zang, X. T. Liu, and B. Y. Han
Appl. Opt. 59(23) 7053-7065 (2020)

Simulation and experimental study on laser cleaning of paint-rust mixed layer on a Q235 surface

Hanqi Liu, Hang Dong, Tanghao Wang, Shanman Lu, and Wei Zhang
Appl. Opt. 63(12) 3290-3298 (2024)

Surface integrity control of laser cleaning of an aluminum alloy surface paint layer

Teng Shan, Fengshi Yin, Sijie Wang, Yulin Qiao, and Pengfei Liu
Appl. Opt. 59(30) 9313-9319 (2020)

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (15)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic of the optical fiber laser cleaning device.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Surface morphology of the uncleaned paint coating.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Schematics of the laser cleaning method of paint removal.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Damage characteristics of the laser cleaning paint layer: (a) 6 and (b) 9 W.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. 3D morphology of cleaning pits after the single-pulse laser scanning paint layer with different laser powers. (${\rm v} = {2600}\;{\rm mm/s}$, 30 kHz): (a) 10.5, (b) 12, (c) 13.5, (d) 15, (e) 16.5, and (f) 18 W.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Parameters of the cleaning pits after single-pulse laser scanning paint layers of different laser powers.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. 3D morphology of the surface of pulse laser cleaning with different scanning speeds (power 16.5 W, repeat frequency ${\rm f} = {30}\;{\rm KHz}$): (a), (d) 1000; (b), (e) 2400; (c), (f) 2600 mm/s.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. 3D morphology of the surface of pulse laser cleaning with different pulse frequencies (16.5 W, 2600 mm/s): (a), (d) 20; (b), (e) 30; (c), (f) 40; (g), (h) 50; (j), (k) 60 kHz.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. Parameters of the cleaning pits after different pulse frequencies of a single-pulse laser scanning paint layer.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10. 3D morphology of the surface of the orthogonal experiment.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11. 3D morphology of the surface cleaned with different laser powers. (a) 12, (b) 13.5, (c) 15, (d) 16.5, (e) 18, and (f) 19.5 W.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 12. 3D morphology of the surface cleaned at different scanning speeds. (a) 200, (b) 400, (c) 600, (d) 800, (e) 1000, and (f) 1200 mm/s.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 13. 3D morphology of the surface cleaned at different pulse frequencies. (a) 20, (b) 25, (c) 30, (d) 35, (e) 40, and (f) 45 kHz.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 14. Paint layer cleaning surface and cleaning product morphology.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 15. Mechanism diagram of pulsed laser paint removal.

Tables (9)

Tables Icon

Table 1. Main Parameters of Optical Fiber Laser

Tables Icon

Table 2. Level of Factors

Tables Icon

Table 3. Specific Parameters of the Orthogonal Experiment

Tables Icon

Table 4. Evaluation Score of Stripping Surface Cleanliness

Tables Icon

Table 5. Results of the Orthogonal Experiment

Tables Icon

Table 6. Variance Analysis

Tables Icon

Table 7. Surface Roughness after Laser Cleaning with Different Laser Powers

Tables Icon

Table 8. Surface Roughness after Laser Cleaning with Different Scanning Speeds

Tables Icon

Table 9. Surface Roughness after Laser Cleaning with Different Pulse Frequencies

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

η = E ρ α ρ c h P f ,
Y i = a i 1 y i 1 + a i 2 y i 2 + a i 3 y i 3 + + a ij y ij ,
Δ T = 2 F β κ α τ π .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.