Abstract

The proliferation of applications for near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy has been fostered by advances in instrumentation and statistics. NIR analytical instrumentation is becoming more stable and reliable. Chemometrics is playing an important role in qualitative and quantitative NIR spectra analysis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performances of four commonly used calibration models: (1) stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR); (2) classical least-squares (CLS); (3) principal component regression (PCR); and (4) partial least-squares (PLS) in NIR spectroscopy analysis when random noise is present in the optical data. A conceptually simple procedure for comparing the performance of the four calibration methods in the presence of different levels of random noise in spectra data has been introduced here. This procedure, using the computer simulation data and real spectra of tobacco, has provided useful information for understanding the effects of random noise on the performance of multivariate calibration methods. Both numerical and graphical results will be shown.

© 1998 NIR Publications

Quantitative analysis of bayberry juice acidity based on visible and near-infrared spectroscopy

Yongni Shao, Yong He, and Jingyuan Mao
Appl. Opt. 46(25) 6391-6396 (2007)

Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance

J. P. Rolland and H. H. Barrett
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9(5) 649-658 (1992)

Effects of a random phase screen on the performance of an imaging system

Chih-Chin Yang and M. A. Plonus
Opt. Lett. 19(14) 1073-1075 (1994)

Extraction of information from laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy spectral data by multivariate analysis

Nicole Labbé, Isabel Maya Swamidoss, Nicolas André, Madhavi Z. Martin, Timothy M. Young, and Timothy G. Rials
Appl. Opt. 47(31) G158-G165 (2008)

Discussion on the validity of NIR spectral data in non-invasive blood glucose sensing

Wanjie Zhang, Rong Liu, Wen Zhang, Hao Jia, and Kexin Xu
Biomed. Opt. Express 4(6) 789-802 (2013)