Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Theta-modulated generation of chromatic orbital angular momentum beams from a white-light source

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We demonstrate a simple experiment to produce chromatic orbital angular momentum (OAM) beams from a white-light source based on theta-modulation. The array of pixels of a single spatial light modulator (SLM) is divided into four sub-domains, each of which individually displays a holographic grating both for producing the desired OAM beam and for modulating the orientation of the blazed grating. In the Fourier plane of a 4f optical system, a tailor-made spatial filter is employed for the coloration of various OAM beams with different colors. In the imaging plane, we record the generated chromatic OAM beams of different topological charges as well as their superpositions, which appear as mixtures of red, green and blue (RGB) in different proportions. Our work may find direct application in optical information processing and in free-space optical communications.

© 2016 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

The orbital angular momentum (OAM) carried by a twisted light beam is associated with the helical phase structure ofexp(iφ), where is an integer andφis the azimuthal angle. In such a beam, each photon carries a well-defined OAM of , and in principle, the OAM can exist within an inherently infinite dimensional Hilbert space [1]. Over the past two decades, optical OAM has attracted a lot of research interest due to its promising applications ranging from biophysics [2], micromechanics [3], microscopy imaging [4] and quantum communications [5]. The OAM has been readily generated and extensively investigated with the monochromatic laser source [6–10], however, there were few studies reporting the connection of OAM with the white-light sources. Based on the combination of a single fork grating with a dispersion compensator, Leach et al. observed the chromatic effects near a white-light vortex with co-axial spectral components [11]. Besides, Wright et al. illustrated the mechanical effect of a white-light vortex beam, as a result of OAM transfer from light to microscopic particles held in optical tweezers [12]. Spangenberg et al. used a spatial light modulator (SLM) to shape any wavelength of a super-continuum fiber laser, and to produce a rotating white-light Bessel beams carrying orbital angular momentum [13]. Very recently, Kobashi et al. described the polychromatic generation of optical vortices in cholesteric liquid crystals, owing to the Bragg-reflection-based conversion mechanism [14]. Here we use a white-light LED source to produce chromatic OAM beams as well as their superpositions. In contrast with previous schemes, our approach is based on the combination of fork holographic gratings with the technique of theta-modulation in a 4f optical system. This method enables the OAM coloration with various topological charges, appearing as a tunable mixture of red, green and blue (RGB) in different proportions.

The theta-modulation was actually not a new optical technique, which was first proposed early in 1965 by Armitage and Lohmann [15]. This technique originated from the famous Abbe-Porter experiment, and were explored for production of a color image from a black and white film and for multiplex storage. Based on theta-modulation, the techniques of color mixture [16], optical logical processing [17], and multiplexing in multiple image [18] were subsequently demonstrated. Recently, theta-modulation was also extended to realize a dynamical optical encrypting technique to color time evolving phenomena [19]. Here we incorporate the theta-modulation into the programmable holographic gratings addressed by a spatial light modulator (SLM), and produce chromatic OAM beams of various topological charges from a white-light source. We anticipate that these chromatic OAM beams could find direct application in wavelength multiplexing for OAM-based optical communication.

2. Method and setup

There have been several methods established to generate OAM beams, such as spiral phase plate [9, 10], cylindrical lenses mode converter [20], computer-generated holograms [6] and q-plates [21]. Among these techniques, the spatial light modulator (SLM) has been a convenient and reliable way to shape the phase and amplitude of a light beam [22]. Here we employ a single SLM to perform the theta-modulation with OAM generation. Figure 1 is our experimental setup used for producing the chromatic OAM beams from a white-light source, which is basically a 4f optical system consisting of two lenses with focal length f1 = 500 mm and f2 = 300 mm. The white light derived from a 1 W LED (Daheng, GCI-060411) has a bandwidth ranging from 440 nm to 670 nm. A telescope is used to collimate the white-light beam, which then illuminates the SLM uniformly. The SLM is put at the object plane of the 4f system, while the demodulation of spatial filtering is performed at the Fourier plane. Then we record the generated OAM beams by placing a color CCD at the image plane.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Optical setup of 4f system used for theta-modulated chromatic OAM generation. Inset (a) and (b) Typical examples of holograms displayed by SLM; (c) Frequency spectrum in the Fourier plane, where the pinholes are exaggerated by the color circles.

Download Full Size | PDF

The SLM (Hamamatsu, X10486-1) we use here is a phase-only modulator, which has an array of pixels (800 × 600) with an effective area of 16 mm × 12 mm and a pixel pitch of 20 μm. Each pixel imprints individually the incoming light with a phase modulation (0 ∼2π) according to the 8-bit grayscale (0 ∼255). And the whole SLM acts as a reconfigurable diffractive element, allowing an interactive manipulation with a response time comparable to the video displays. For producing helically phased OAM beams, the frequently used design is to add a blazed grating modulo 2π to a spiral phase ofexp(iφ), then we obtain a forked hologram with a prongeddislocation on the beam axis. When illuminated with a monochromatic Gaussian beam, the first-order diffracted beam acquires the desired exp(iφ) phase structure and therefore carries OAM per photon. It is noted that the SLM is not achromatic diffractive device such that the diffraction can create “rainbow” colors with a broadband white-light illumination. And the mth-order diffraction angle θm for wavelength λ is determined by the well-known grating equation, d(sinθm+sinθi)=mλ, where d denotes the grating period, θi and θm are the incident and diffracted angles, respectively, with respect to the normal to the grating surface [23]. However, it is just this spectral dispersion that enables the spatial filtering to generate the chromatic OAM with various RGB mixtures. To perform the theta-modulation, we divide the pixel array into four rectangle sub-domains, each of which has an area of 8 mm × 6 mm, consisting of 400 × 300 pixels, as was shown by inset (a) of Fig. 1. In each fork holographic grating, the prongeddislocation is responsible for the desired transverse phase structure of the diffracted light, while the blazed grating only serves as the carrier and its orientation determines the diffraction direction. Generally, we have the transmission function,T(x,y)=exp[iH(x,y)] for a pure phase grating, and specifically for our case,H(x,y) can be written as,

H(x,y)=2πλ(xcosθ+ysinθ)+Φ(x,y),
where θ denotes the orientation of the blazed grating with respect to x-axis (theta-modulation), and Φ(x,y)describes the desired transverse phase profile. Note that though our SLM is a pure-phase device, it can also be utilized to shape the intensity of the diffracted light. This can be realized by multiplying the phase holograms with the desired intensity distribution, and the final hologram is given by [24, 25],
H(x,y)=H(x,y)×sinc2(π[1I(x,y)]),
where I(x,y) is the desired intensity distribution, and sinc2() accounts for the mapping of the phase depth to the diffraction efficiency of the spatially dependent blazing function.

For theta-modulation, the blazed grating in each domain has been specially designed to have a different orientation, i.e.,θ=0°,45°,90°, and135°, respectively, see inset (a) of Fig. 1. All zero-order diffractions are trivially blocked out. In such a configuration, their diffraction patterns will be angularly separated, namely, situating on the lines along the angle of90°,135°,0°, and 45°, respectively. Each holographic grating can be programmed according to Eq. (1) to generate the desired OAM individually in the 1st-order diffraction. We estimate a conversion efficiency of about 20%. With a white-light illumination, these theta-modulating diffractions are also spectrally dispersed in the Fourier plane, see inset (c) of Fig. 1. In the demodulation process, we insert a tailed-made opaque mask with a set of pinholes to select a certain portion of each frequency spectrum. The size and position of the pinholes is closely related to the spectrum distribution we considered. As was shown by inset (c) of Fig. 1, we have marked these pinholes by color circles such that light beams with varied frequencies and different OAM can be generated effectively. In the image plane of the 4f system, we use a color CCD to record the intensity patterns of the colored OAM beams.

3. Experimental observations and RGB separation

Based on the optical setup of Fig. 1, we produce the chromatic beams with single and multiple OAM, respectively. For single OAM, the holographic gratings are simply the fork ones, which can be prepared according to Eq. (1) with Φ(x,y)=φ. The prong number in the center of the fork hologram determines the generated OAM number and the orientation of the grating is responsible for the theta-modulation. One typical example was shown by the inset (a) of Fig. 1, which are used for generation of single OAM =2,3, 4 and 5, respectively, see Fig. 2(b). We put an opaque disk in the Fourier plane and filter out suitable frequency components with four punctured pinholes in different locations of the disk. We use a color CCD camera to record the generated OAM beams in the image plane, and present our observations in Fig. 2. We successfully generated single OAM with different OAM numbers ranging from =1 to=5, and their colors are approximately blue, red, light green and light yellow. Besides, the reliability of our results can also be verified by these observed bright intensity rings, from which one can see that the ring radius scales with generally [26].

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Generation of single chromatic OAM, with the numbers being the topological charges.

Download Full Size | PDF

We perform a further experiment to generate the chromatic OAM mixtures. Without loss of generality, we have considered the coherent superposition of two different OAM, i.e., LGp=01 andLGp=02, where LGpdenotes the LG beam with radial and azimuthal indices p and, respectively. The holograms loaded on SLM are made according to Eq. (2), withΦ(x,y)=arg(LGp=01+LGp=02) andI(x,y)=|LGp=01+LGp=02|2. For example, the hologram shown by inset (b) of Fig. 1 was used to generate the beams in Fig. 3(b). The recoded patterns result essentially from the interference of anexp(i1φ) beam with the other exp(i2φ) beam, where the complete constructive and destructive interference occurs at the angle φ determined bycos(12)φ=±1, respectively. As a consequence, a pattern like a (12)-petal flower is formed [27, 28]. The observations of Fig. 3 confirm again the good feasibility of our scheme. Besides, it is noted that ± OAM superstitions, as shown by Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), have been extensively employed to the measurement of rotational Doppler shifts [29].

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Interference petal-like patterns of two OAM, LGp=01 andLGp=02, where the OAM combinations are indicated above each figure. The pixels indicated by white squares in (a) are used for RGB analysis in Fig. 4.

Download Full Size | PDF

In the frame of RGB color model, we analyze the color composition of the generated chromatic OAM beams. A color in the RGB model is described by indicating how much of each of the red (R), green (G), and blue (B) is included [30], which is expressed as an RGB triplet(r,g,b), and each component vary in the range 0 to 255. If all the components are at zero the result is black; if all are at maximum, the result is the brightest representable white. Without loss of generality, we pick up several pixels in Fig. 3(a) to specifically illustrate the RGB components. We present the RGB histograms in Fig. 4, and it is just these various RGB combinations that indicates the effective generation of chromatic OAM beams by our scheme. We also recorded the full spectral data as was shown in Fig. 4(e). Based on the grating function, we have estimated and marked the wavelengths of Figs. 4(a)-4(c) in the spectrum. Besides, it is noted that the generated chromatic OAM beams are displaced in space. Thus a possible extension of our scheme is to use additionally a serious of beam splitters to combine these beams directly for OAM multiplexing. Besides, we think that a similar corporation of theta-modulation with two-dimensional complex gratings may offer a simpler scheme for the same purpose, and we would like to leave this in our further studies.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The RGB analysis. (a)-(d) are the top-left, top-right, bottom-left and bottom-right pixels indicated by white squares in Fig. 3(a), respectively; (e) Measured rainbow spectrum.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In summary, we have incorporated the theta-modulation technique into the fork holograms to generate the chromatic OAM beams from a white light source based on a basic 4f optical system. The principle of preparing the desired holograms has been discussed. We have observed the generation of both single chromatic OAM and multiple chromatic OAM superpositions, and the RGB color model is utilized to show the feasibility of our scheme. The agreement between theoretical and experimental results can be clearly seen. Our work may find direct application in the OAM-based optical communication, where the multi-state and multi-color OAM holds promise for increasing the data capacity significantly.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (11474238, 91636109); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities at Xiamen University (20720160040, 20720150166); the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China for Distinguished Young Scientists (2015J06002); and the program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China (NCET-13-0495).

References and links

1. L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A 45(11), 8185–8189 (1992). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. D. G. Grier, “A revolution in optical manipulation,” Nature 424(6950), 810–816 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. P. Galajda and P. Ormos, “Complex micromachines produced and driven by light,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 78(2), 249–251 (2001). [CrossRef]  

4. S. Bernet, A. Jesacher, S. Fürhapter, C. Maurer, and M. Ritsch-Marte, “Quantitative imaging of complex samples by spiral phase contrast microscopy,” Opt. Express 14(9), 3792–3805 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. G. Gibson, J. Courtial, M. Padgett, M. Vasnetsov, V. Pas’ko, S. Barnett, and S. Franke-Arnold, “Free-space information transfer using light beams carrying orbital angular momentum,” Opt. Express 12(22), 5448–5456 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. V. Y. Bazhenov, M. Vasnetsov, and M. Soskin, “Laser beams with screw dislocations in their wavefronts,” JETP Lett. 52, 429–431 (1990).

7. N. Heckenberg, R. McDuff, C. Smith, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and M. Wegener, “Laser beams with phase singularities,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 24(9), S951–S962 (1992). [CrossRef]  

8. M. S. Soskin, V. N. Gorshkov, M. V. Vasnetsov, J. T. Malos, and N. R. Heckenberg, “Topological charge and angular momentum of light beams carrying optical vortices,” Phys. Rev. A 56(5), 4064–4075 (1997). [CrossRef]  

9. M. W. Beijersbergen, R. P. C. Coerwinkel, M. Kristensen, and J. P. Woerdman, “Helical-wavefront laser beams produced with a spiral phaseplate,” Opt. Commun. 112(5-6), 321–327 (1994). [CrossRef]  

10. G. A. Turnbull, D. A. Robertson, G. M. Smith, L. Allen, and M. J. Padgett, “The generation of free-space Laguerre-Gaussian modes at millimetre-wave frequencies by use of a spiral phaseplate,” Opt. Commun. 127(4-6), 183–188 (1996). [CrossRef]  

11. J. Leach and M. Padgett, “Observation of chromatic effects near a white-light vortex,” New J. Phys. 5, 154 (2003). [CrossRef]  

12. A. J. Wright, J. M. Girkin, G. M. Gibson, J. Leach, and M. J. Padgett, “Transfer of orbital angular momentum from a super-continuum, white-light beam,” Opt. Express 16(13), 9495–9500 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. D.-M. Spangenberg, A. Dudley, P. H. Neethling, E. G. Rohwer, and A. Forbes, “White light wavefront control with a spatial light modulator,” Opt. Express 22(11), 13870–13879 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. J. Kobashi, H. Yoshida, and M. Ozaki, “Polychromatic Optical Vortex Generation from Patterned Cholesteric Liquid Crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(25), 253903 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. J. D. Armitage and A. W. Lohmann, “Theta Modulation in Optics,” Appl. Opt. 4(4), 399 (1965). [CrossRef]  

16. P. Andres, C. Ferreira, A. Pons, and C. Hernandez, “Colour mixtures through theta-modulation technique,” Opt. Commun. 48(2), 103–106 (1983). [CrossRef]  

17. A. W. L. H. Bartelt and E. E. Sicre, “Optical logical processing in parallel with theta modulation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1(9), 944–951 (1984). [CrossRef]  

18. A. S. Kumar and R. M. Vasu, “Multiplexing in multiple imaging through the theta modulation technique,” Opt. Commun. 66(1), 6–8 (1988). [CrossRef]  

19. F. Mosso, M. Tebaldi, J. F. Barrera, N. Bolognini, and R. Torroba, “Pure optical dynamical color encryption,” Opt. Express 19(15), 13779–13786 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. M. J. Padgett and L. Allen, “Orbital angular momentum exchange in cylindrical-lens mode converters,” J. Opt. B Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 4(2), S17–S19 (2002). [CrossRef]  

21. L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, “Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(16), 163905 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. L. Zhu and J. Wang, “Arbitrary manipulation of spatial amplitude and phase using phase-only spatial light modulators,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7441 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. N. Bonod and J. Neauport, “Diffraction gratings: from principles to applications in high-intensity lasers,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 8(1), 156–199 (2016). [CrossRef]  

24. J. Leach, M. R. Dennis, J. Courtial, and M. J. Padgett, “Vortex knots in light,” New J. Phys. 7, 55 (2005). [CrossRef]  

25. L. Chen, W. Zhang, Q. Lu, and X. Lin, “Making and identifying optical superpositions of high orbital angular momenta,” Phys. Rev. A 88(5), 053831 (2013). [CrossRef]  

26. M. J. Padgett and L. Allen, “The Poynting vector in Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes,” Opt. Commun. 121(1-3), 36–40 (1995). [CrossRef]  

27. M. Padgett, J. Arlt, N. Simpson, and L. Allen, “An experiment to observe the intensity and phase structure of Laguerre–Gaussian laser modes,” Am. J. Phys. 64(1), 77–82 (1996). [CrossRef]  

28. W. Zhang, Q. Qi, J. Zhou, and L. Chen, “Mimicking Faraday Rotation to Sort the Orbital Angular Momentum of Light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(15), 153601 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. M. P. Lavery, F. C. Speirits, S. M. Barnett, and M. J. Padgett, “Detection of a spinning object using light’s orbital angular momentum,” Science 341(6145), 537–540 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. R. W. G. Hunt, The Reproduction of Colour (John Wiley & Sons, 2005).

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Optical setup of 4f system used for theta-modulated chromatic OAM generation. Inset (a) and (b) Typical examples of holograms displayed by SLM; (c) Frequency spectrum in the Fourier plane, where the pinholes are exaggerated by the color circles.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Generation of single chromatic OAM, with the numbers being the topological charges.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Interference petal-like patterns of two OAM, LG p=0 1 and LG p=0 2 , where the OAM combinations are indicated above each figure. The pixels indicated by white squares in (a) are used for RGB analysis in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The RGB analysis. (a)-(d) are the top-left, top-right, bottom-left and bottom-right pixels indicated by white squares in Fig. 3(a), respectively; (e) Measured rainbow spectrum.

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H(x,y)= 2π λ ( xcosθ+ysinθ )+Φ(x,y),
H (x,y)=H(x,y)×sin c 2 ( π[ 1I(x,y) ] ),
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.