Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Surface transformation multi-physics for controlling electromagnetic and acoustic waves simultaneously

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A multi-physics null medium that performs as a perfect endoscope for both electromagnetic and acoustic waves is designed by transformation optics, which opens a new way to control electromagnetic and acoustic waves simultaneously. Surface transformation multi-physics, which is a novel graphical method to design multi-physics devices, is proposed based on the directional projecting feature of a multi-physics null medium. Many multi-physics devices, including beam shifters, scattering reduction, imaging devices and beam steering devices, for both electromagnetic and acoustic waves can be simply designed in a surface-corresponding manner. All devices designed by surface transformation multi-physics only need one homogeneous anisotropic medium (null medium) to realize, which can be approximately implemented by a brass plate array without any artificial sub-wavelength structures. Numerical simulations are given to verify the performances of the designed multi-physics devices made of brass plate array.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Thermal surface transformation and its applications to heat flux manipulations

Fei Sun, Yichao Liu, Yibiao Yang, Zhihui Chen, and Sailing He
Opt. Express 27(23) 33757-33767 (2019)

Multi-functional coding metasurface for dual-band independent electromagnetic wave control

Wen-Long Guo, Guang-Ming Wang, Hai-Sheng Hou, Ke Chen, and Yijun Feng
Opt. Express 27(14) 19196-19211 (2019)

Controlling electromagnetic scattering of a cavity by transformation media

Shenyun Wang and Shaobin Liu
Opt. Express 20(6) 6777-6787 (2012)

Supplementary Material (10)

NameDescription
Visualization 1       Visualization 1
Visualization 2       Visualization 2
Visualization 3       Visualization 3
Visualization 4       Visualization 4
Visualization 5       Visualization 5
Visualization 6       Visualization 6
Visualization 7       Visualization 7
Visualization 8       Visualization 8
Visualization 9       Visualization 9
Visualization 10       Visualization 10

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. The coordinate transformation relation between the real space (a) and the reference space (b). The yellow region between surfaces S1 and S2 of arbitrarily shapes is compressed into a thin yellow slab of thickness Δ in the reference space. The yellow regions in the real space and in the reference space are divided into many small trapezoid regions of height hi. Representative small trapezoid regions in the real space (c) and in the reference space (d).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The structures of metal plate array (a) and a metal plate with periodic sub-wavelength square holes (b) to effectively realize the 2D and 3D reduced null media, respectively. The metals are indicated by the blue color. d is the lattice constant. a is the height of the air gaps in (a) and side length of square air cylinders.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) Structure of the brass plate array used to achieve a multi-physics shifter for both electromagnetic wave and acoustic wave simultaneously (the thick black lines are brass and all other white regions are air). The length of each brass plate is h =mλ0 (the Fabry-Pérot resonance condition) and m = 2 here. The thickness of brass plate and air gap are both λ0/10, which means the filling factor of brass and air is 0.5. The angle between the brass plates and x axis is α=30 degree. The structure is designed at working wavelength λ0=3cm: corresponding frequencies are 10 GHz for electromagnetic wave and 11.433kHz for acoustic wave, respectively. (b) and (c) are distributions of normalized magnetic field’s z component for the TM polarized waves when a Gaussian electromagnetic beam incidents onto the brass plate array by 0 degree and -30 degree, respectively (see Visualization 1). (d) and (e) are normalized acoustic pressure distributions when a Gaussian acoustic beam incidents onto the brass plate array by 0 degree and -30 degree, respectively (see Visualization 2). (e) and (f) show the reflectivity of the multi-physics shifter in (a) when the wavelength deviates from the designed value λ0=3 cm for EM wave and acoustic wave, respectively (see Visualization 3 and Visualization 4).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) The structure of the brass plate array for multi-physics scattering reduction. The thick black lines are brass plates of thickness λ0/10 and length h= 2λ0. (b)-(d) The normalized magnetic field’s z component for the TM polarized waves when a Gaussian electromagnetic beam incidents onto the brass plate array by 0, 20 and 40 degrees (see Visualization 5). (e)-(g) The normalized acoustic pressure when a Gaussian acoustic beam incidents onto the brass plate array by 0, 20 and 40 degrees (see Visualization 6). The boundaries of the central object of strong scattering are set as PEC and hard walls for electromagnetic wave and acoustic wave, respectively. All other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 3. Visualization 7 and Visualization 8 show Gaussian beam normally incidents onto the multi-physics scattering reduction device in Fig. 4(a) when the wavelength of incident Gaussian beam changes from λ0/3 to 2λ0 for electromagnetic case and acoustic case, respectively.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Scattering when a Gaussian beam incidents onto the strongly scattering object by 0, 20 and 40 degrees. (a)-(c) The corresponding normalized magnetic field’s z component when the brass plates are removed from Figs. 4(b)–4(d) (only the central object of strong scattering is left in air). (d)-(f) The corresponding normalized acoustic pressure when the brass plates are removed from Figs. 4(e)–4(g). Other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 3. Visualization 9 and Visualization 10 show Gaussian beam normally incidents onto the strongly scattering object in the center of Fig. 4(a) (scattering reduction device is removed) when the wavelength of incident Gaussian beam changes from λ0/3 to 2λ0 for electromagnetic case and acoustic case, respectively.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. (a) Structure of the beam steering device. (b) and (c) are normalized amplitude of acoustic pressure and z component of the magnetic field in 2D numerical simulations when acoustic wave and TM polarized electromagnetic wave incident onto the beam steering device, respectively.

Equations (11)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

{ ε = J ε J T det ( J ) μ = J μ J T det ( J ) ,   { ρ 1 = J ρ 1 J T det ( J ) κ = det ( J ) κ .
x = { d 1 / ( Δ / 2 ) x , x [ 0 , d 1 ] tan ( π α 1 ) ( x Δ 2 ) / tan ( π θ 1 ) + d 1 , x [ d 1 , d 1 + h i / tan ( π θ 1 ) ] d 2 / ( Δ / 2 ) x , x [ d 2 , 0 ) tan α 2 ( x + Δ 2 ) / tan θ 2 d 2 , x [ d 2 h i / tan θ 2 , d 2 ] x , e l s e ; y = y ; z = z .
ε ε 0 = μ μ 0 = ρ 0 ρ = { d i a g ( 2 d 1 / Δ , Δ / 2 d 1 , Δ / 2 d 1 ) , x [ 0 , d 1 ] d i a g ( tan ( π α 1 ) / tan ( π θ 1 ) , tan ( π θ 1 ) / tan ( π α 1 ) , tan ( π θ 1 ) / tan ( π α 1 ) ) , x [ d 1 , d 1 + h i / tan ( π θ 1 ) ] d i a g ( 2 d 2 / Δ , Δ / 2 d 2 , Δ / 2 d 2 ) , x [ d 2 , 0 ) d i a g ( tan α 2 / tan θ 2 , tan θ 2 / tan α 2 , tan θ 2 / tan α 2 ) , x [ d 2 h i / tan θ 2 , d 2 ] 1 , e s l e .
κ / κ 0 = { 2 d 1 / Δ , x [ 0 , d 1 ] tan ( π α 1 ) / tan ( π θ 1 ) , x [ d 1 , d 1 + h i / tan ( π θ 1 ) ] 2 d 2 / Δ , x [ d 2 , 0 ) tan α 2 / tan θ 2 , x [ d 2 h i / tan θ 2 , d 2 ] 1 , e s l e .
ε ε 0 = μ μ 0 = ρ 0 ρ α 1 π / 2 α 2 π / 2 Δ 0 { d i a g ( , 0 , 0 ) , d 1 x d 2 1 , e l s e .
κ κ 0 α 1 π / 2 α 2 π / 2 Δ 0 { , d 1 x d 2 1 , e l s e .
{ ε = μ = d i a g ( , 0 , 0 ) ρ = d i a g ( 0 , , ) κ = , d 1 x d 2 .
{ ε y = d a ε h , ε x = ε z μ y = μ h , μ x = μ z = a d μ h .
ε y = d a ε h , μ z = a d μ h , ε x .
1 ρ x = f h ρ h + f m ρ m ,   ρ y = f h ρ h + f m ρ m ,   1 κ = f h κ h + f m κ m .
{ ε y = 2 ε 0 , μ z = 0.5 μ 0 , ε x ρ x = 2.58 k g / m 3 , ρ y = 4250.6 k g / m 3 , = 0.3 M P a .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.