Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Femtosecond laser inscription of waveguides and Bragg gratings in transparent cyclic olefin copolymers

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We report on a femtosecond laser based fabrication technique that enables simultaneous single-step generation of optical waveguides and Bragg gratings inside bulk cyclic olefin copolymers. Due to the nonlinear absorption of focused and spatially modulated laser radiation with a wavelength of 514 nm and a pulse duration of 450 fs, a modification concluding a refractive index shift increase inside the substrate can be achieved. A sophisticated characterization of the generated waveguides by means of an elaborate cut-back method reveals a maximum attenuation of 3.2 dB/cm. Additionally, a Mach-Zehnder interferometer is used to examine the waveguide’s refractive index profile. The integrated Bragg grating structures exhibit reflectivities up to 95 % and a spectral full width at half maximum of 288 pm, at a Bragg wavelength of 1582 nm, whereas the grating period can be deliberately chosen by adapting the fabrication parameters. Thus, due to its increased flexibility and the resulting dispensability of cost-intensive phase masks, this method constitutes an especially promising fabrication process for polymer Bragg gratings inside of bulk materials.

© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Integrated optical elements continuously attract considerable interest in applied and basic research [1]. The fabrication of photonic structures in planar transparent standard polymers [2,3] or organic-inorganic hybrid polymers [46] is commonly based on UV irradiation of the substrate. Using phase masks or interference effects, integrated optical elements such as Bragg gratings can be generated [79] and can be, mainly but not solely, used in sensor applications [3,10]. While these processes are associated with a very high performance, they have a limited freedom of design and are generally restricted to the substrate surface. An efficient possibility to create internal structures, in arbitrary depth below the surface, e.g. hollow microfluidic channel architectures in transparent materials, is the application of ultrashort laser pulses enabling a localized and distinctive energy deposition inside of the material [11,12]. By using focused femtosecond laser pulses to produce photonic structures, restrictions to the surface can be overcome as already demonstrated for planar glass substrates and fibers showing optical waveguides, couplers, interferometers, and grating structures [1315] inside bulk material. Based on nonlinear absorption of the laser pulse energy, a local change of the refractive index inside each focal voxel can be achieved. Especially Bragg gratings profit from an increased flexibility as point-by-point inscription allowing simultaneous creation of waveguide and Bragg gratings of almost any desired period [16] and structure, such as chirped Bragg gratings [17], superstructure Bragg gratings [18], phase-shifted Bragg gratings [19], or long period Bragg gratings [20] using only a single setup without the necessity to apply various cost-intensive phase masks [15]. This greater flexibility in conjunction with value-added total cost of ownership qualifies femtosecond lasers as a powerful tool in photonic device manufacturing.

In transparent standard polymers, e.g. polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), there are various reports on refractive index shifts in both positive [2123] and negative [2426] direction induced by ultrashort laser pulses depending on the applied processing conditions e.g. laser pulse repetition rate. According to the state of the art, however, photonic structures fabricated by femtosecond laser irradiation in planar transparent polymer substrates are still limited to the generation of simple configurations such as internal waveguides and couplers in PMMA [2123,27,28].

Amongst others, low-cost polymer planar waveguide-based devices fabricated by UV irradiation have already been applied for refractive index sensing, lab-on-a-chip applications, highly sensitive temperature measurements, and deformation sensing [2931]. Especially cyclic olefin copolymers (COCs), offering a low water absorption of less than 0.01 %, a high glass transition temperature, and a high resistance against common solvents are highly suitable to be used in a wide range of sensor applications [32]. In this study, we present a method to combine both, direct writing of waveguides and Bragg gratings in COCs based on femtosecond laser irradiation using an adaptive beam shaping approach. The generated structures are characterized according to their refractive index profile and their optical performance in terms of waveguide attenuation and Bragg grating reflectivity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on femtosecond laser inscribed optical waveguides and Bragg gratings inside COCs bulk material.

2. Experimental

2.1 Laser system

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the setup for femtosecond laser inscription of photonic structures inside bulk polymer including a spatial light modulator (SLM) and a 4f telescope with an additional pinhole in front of the focusing objective (a) and schematic illustration of an internal Bragg grating connected to waveguides on both ends (b).

Download Full Size | PDF

We employ an ultrashort pulse laser (Light Conversion, Pharos-10-600) with a fundamental wavelength of 1028 nm featuring an adjustable pulse duration from 220 fs to 15 ps and variable repetition rates up to 610 kHz. By using a second harmonic generation module, a laser wavelength of 514 nm can be emitted. The linear polarized laser beam is shaped using a spatial light modulator (SLM; Holoeye, Pluto VIS 21) with a resolution of 1920x1080 pixels and a pixel size of 8 µm. A 4f setup (f=300 mm) is used to image the SLM pattern at the focusing objective. At the focal plane of the telescope a pinhole is inserted to block the zeroth order of a blazed grating displayed on the SLM, as depicted in Fig. 1. The first diffracted order passes unaffected through the pinhole and is focused by an air objective with a NA of 0.5 (Zeiss, EC Epiplan-Neofluar) into the material. The phase function displayed on the SLM is calculated to enable both, a shaping of the beam to achieve a thin disk upright standing energy distribution [3335] and to correct the spherical aberration lens effect caused by the refractive index mismatch between air and processed transparent polymer [36]. Beam measurements on the resulting focal volume (voxel) using a coaxial CCD camera (Imagingsource, DMK 27AUJ003) are depicted in Fig. 2. The energy distribution of the focal voxel is characterized by a horizontal size of 1.5 µm in x direction, 25 µm in y direction (both measured at 1/e$^2$) and a focal height of 7.5 µm (FWHM). During processing, samples are positioned using linear translation stages (Aerotech, ANT130-XY). The focal position is controlled by a nanopositioning z stage (Aerotech, ANT95-50-L-Z).

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Measured normalized beam profile of the elliptical focal voxel in (a) x-y cross-section at the focal position, (b) y-z cross-section, (c) x-z cross-section using an ellipticity of 15 and an effective NA of 0.24 on the major axis.

Download Full Size | PDF

2.2 Material and methods

Photonic structures are generated according to the scheme shown in Fig. 1 and are consisting of a centered Bragg grating with a length of 5 mm which is directly coupled to laser inscribed waveguides on both sides. Thereby, all respective structures are created in a depth of 500 µm below the surface. Commercially available injection molded bulk COC sheets (type TOPAS 6017) with a thickness of 1.5 mm and a glass transition temperature of $175^\circ {\mbox {C}}$ are used. The refractive index $n$ of the material at the laser wavelength of 514 nm is 1.5362 at room temperature measured by Abbe refractometry [37]. The polymer sample is cut using the same ultrashort pulse laser in combination with a precision cutting head (FineCutter, Precitec) as already demonstrated by the authors [3]. Employing a laser pulse repetition rate of 250 kHz and a laser output power of 8.5 W at a wavelength of 1028 nm enables a cutting speed of 1 mm/s. The cutting process is supported by a coaxial nitrogen stream with a pressure of 6 bar enabling burr-free surfaces.

2.3 Characterization

The spatial distribution of the laser induced shift of the refractive index at 633 nm is measured by using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer microscope, a sophisticated discussion of the measurement setup is given by Hessler et al. [37,38]. Optical micrographs are obtained by using a reflection and transmission light microscope (Nikon, 70 Eclipse LVDIA-N). The attenuation of the waveguide is determined by reducing the size of a processed COC substrate using an advanced micromilling machine (Minitech Machinery, Minimill 4) and performing a measurement of the transmitted power at each length. To facilitate attenuation measurements, the optical waveguide is coupled to a single mode fiber. The output signal is collected by a multi-mode fiber. The attenuation coefficient is obtained for the structure under test by best fit straight line. In addition, generated structures are analyzed by recording the reflected and transmitted spectra of the Bragg grating using a source and detector interrogation system (Micron Optics, si155 HYPERION) that operates in a wavelength range from 1460 to 1620 nm. Thereby, the spectral position of the reflected Bragg wavelength, the full-width at half-maximum bandwidth (FWHM) and the reflected power are examined.

3. Results and discussion

The fabrication of photonic structures inside of bulk COC substrates is performed in a single processing step. Substrates are irradiated using a laser pulse energy between 280 nJ and 336 nJ at a wavelength of 514 nm, a laser pulse repetition rate of 25 kHz and a pulse duration of 450 fs. The spatial distribution of the laser induced refractive index modification generated in a depth of 500 µm with a pulse spacing of 600 nm (corresponding writing speed = 15 mm/s) is illustrated in Fig. 3(a) measured by using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer at a wavelength of 633 nm. Size and shape of the symmetric circular modification is determined by the intensity distribution of the focal voxel shown in Fig. 1. The strength of the internal refractive index shift is controlled by the applied laser pulse energy. At a laser pulse energy of 336 nJ a maximum positive refractive index increase of $2\cdot 10^{-4}$ RIU is induced inside the bulk polymer. By performing a tempering process step (2 h at 120 °C) the maximum refractive index shift can be increased up to $4\cdot 10^{-4}$ RIU. Femtosecond laser induced refractive index shifts in COC were measured to be lower as compared to the strengths of modifications induced by using deep UV-irradiation at the surface of COC [37] ($1.86\cdot 10^{-3}$ at 633 nm) and to femtosecond laser induced internal structures generated in PMMA substrates [22] ($4.6\cdot 10^{-4}$ at 633 nm). The maximum strength of femtosecond laser induced internal modification is limited by both, a degradation of the material resulting in optical defects and by the appearance of beam filamentation due to the nonlinear refractive index of the polymer substrate at higher laser pulse energies. In addition to this, internal laser induced modifications are observable using a transmission white light microscope. In Fig. 3(b) the lateral dimensions of the horizontal modification are clearly visible and correspond well to the spatial dimensions of the refractive index shifts measured by using Mach-Zehnder interferometry.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Refractive index profile of laser inscribed waveguides at a wavelength 633 nm (a), top view white light transmission microscope image of a waveguide modification 500 µm below the surface (b).

Download Full Size | PDF

The generated structures exhibit a positive refractive index shift and are appropriate to be used as Type I waveguides [39,40]. The output profile at a wavelength of 633 nm of a waveguide inscribed with a laser pulse energy of 336 nJ is given in Fig. 4(a). Size and shape of the measured intensity distribution correspond well with the simulation of the output profile of the integrated waveguide illustrated in Fig. 4(c). The simulation is based on the measured refractive index profile given in Fig. 4(b) using the beam propagation method (Synopsys, Rsoft). The resulting circular gaussian intensity distributions are comparable to femtosecond laser inscribed waveguides in other transparent materials [21,41].

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Measured intensity distribution at the output of an internal waveguide at a wavelength of 633 nm (a), femtosecond laser induced refractive index profile measured by Mach-Zehnder interferometry (b) and corresponding simulation of the intensity distribution using RSoft at a wavelength of 633 nm (c).

Download Full Size | PDF

The attenuation of femtosecond laser inscribed waveguides is measured by using the cut-back method in a wavelength range from 1545 to 1555 nm. In Fig. 5 the graph represents the transmitted optical power of an integrated waveguide at decreasing sample length. Based on linear regression, the integrated waveguide exhibits an attenuation of 3.2 dB/cm. In comparison to results of UV-laser induced waveguides at the surface of planar COC substrates [42] (1.2 dB/cm at 1550 nm) the attenuation coefficient of the internal waveguide is higher. However, compared to femtosecond laser direct written waveguides in planar PMMA substrates [21] (4.2 dB/cm at 633 nm) here, a lower attenuation coefficient is achieved although studied polymers exhibit a remarkable lower absorption at 633 nm.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Transmitted optical power in a wavelength range of 1545 to 1555 nm of a waveguide measured during the cut-back method.

Download Full Size | PDF

Besides the generation of optical waveguides, femtosecond laser direct writing enables the creation of functional elements such as Bragg gratings inside of the transparent material. The inscription of the corresponding periodic refractive index modulation is carried out by a mask-less point-by-point writing exposure. As depicted in Fig. 6(b), the elliptical focal spots enables both, a wide grating perpendicular to the waveguide and a small period along the writing direction. Each period visible is induced by a single laser pulse. The spectral position of the characteristic Bragg wavelength $\lambda _B$ can be calculated according to Eq. (1) with ${n}_{eff}$ being the effective refractive index, $\Lambda$ denoting the period of the grating structure and $m$ describing the order of the Bragg reflection.

$$m\, \lambda_B=2\, {n}_{eff}\, \Lambda$$
Since $\Lambda$ is given in our approach by the pulse-to-pulse distance, it is possible to create various grating periods using only a single processing setup. Gratings with a spatial period of 1040 nm are inscribed at a repetition rate of 500 Hz and a pulse energy of 326 nJ. The reflected spectra given in Fig. 6(a), shows a peak at 1582 nm with a FWHM-bandwidth of 288 pm. The reflectivity of the grating is calculated by recording the transmitted optical spectrum of the grating. At the Bragg wavelength, a transmission dip $T_d$ of about 13 dB as compared to the baseline is detectable which corresponds to a reflectivity $R$ of 95% in accordance to Eq. (2) [43].
$$R=1-10^{-T_d/10}$$
The spectral position of the Bragg wavelength corresponds well with the inscribed spatial period of the grating. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on femtosecond laser inscribed Bragg gratings inside of planar COC substrate, thus approving the applicability of the femtosecond laser direct writing to different material classes such as glass solely by adapting processing parameters. Optical filter characteristics of the generated gratings are comparable to femtosecond direct written Bragg gratings in fused silica [14] showing a maximum reflectivity $R$ of 90% and a peak width of 200 pm at a wavelength of 1547 nm and to planar Bragg gratings fabricated by deep UV mask irradiation of COC having a maximum reflectivity $R$ of 99% and a peak width of 350 pm at a wavelength of 1532 nm [42]. Compared to the femtosecond laser writing of optical waveguides a reduced laser pulse repetition rate is necessary to obtain a defined spectral reflection peak of the Bragg grating. The authors contribute this effect to heat accumulation during processing which disturbs the creation of a continuous periodic refractive index modulation at a higher laser repetition rate.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Transmission and reflection spectra of a waveguide coupled optical grating with a period of 1040 nm (a), white light transmission microscope image of a waveguide coupled optical grating fabricated by femtosecond laser direct writing in cyclic olefin copolymers (b).

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

It was demonstrated that femtosecond laser direct writing is suitable to create photonic structures inside of transparent planar COC substrates. By the application of ultrashort laser pulses at a wavelength of 514 nm a maximum positive refractive index shift of $4\cdot 10^{-4}$ RIU measured by Mach-Zehnder interferometry is obtained. Depending on the processing conditions internal modifications can serve for both, optical waveguides and Bragg gratings. The results show a reflected wavelength of the waveguide coupled Bragg grating of about 1582 nm corresponding to the calculated and measured pulse-to-pulse distances. The high degree of freedom according to the general layout and the Bragg grating characteristics offers outstanding potential for the integration of photonic structures inside of planar polymer substrates.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (ZF4054307DF9).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. R. G. Hunsperger, Integrated Optics (Springer, 2009).

2. C. Wochnowski, S. Metev, and G. Sepold, “UV–laser-assisted modification of the optical properties of polymethylmethacrylate,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 154-155, 706–711 (2000). [CrossRef]  

3. M. Rosenberger, S. Kefer, M. Girschikofsky, G.-L. Roth, S. Hessler, S. Belle, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, “High-temperature stable and sterilizable waveguide Bragg grating in planar cyclo-olefin copolymer,” Opt. Lett. 43(14), 3321–3324 (2018). [CrossRef]  

4. L. R. Xavier, V. R. Fernandes, C. M. S. Vicente, É. Pécoraro, L. D. Carlos, R. A. S. Ferreira, and P. S. André, “UV laser photofabrication of waveguide couplers using self-patterning organic-inorganic hybrids,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 53(10), 2304–2307 (2011). [CrossRef]  

5. M. Girschikofsky, M. Förthner, M. Rommel, L. Frey, and R. Hellmann, “Waveguide Bragg gratings in Ormocer hybrid polymers,” Opt. Express 24(13), 14725–14736 (2016). [CrossRef]  

6. R. A. S. Ferreira, C. M. S. Vicente, V. Fernandes, A. G. Macedo, E. Pecoraro, R. N. Nogueira, P. S. Andrè, P. V. S. Marques, and L. D. Carlos, “Organic-inorganic hybrids for the new generation of optical networks,” 11th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (2009).

7. M. Rosenberger, G. Koller, S. Belle, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, “Planar Bragg grating in bulk polymethylmethacrylate,” Opt. Express 20(25), 27288–27296 (2012). [CrossRef]  

8. A. Othonos, “Fiber bragg gratings,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68(12), 4309–4341 (1997). [CrossRef]  

9. C. M. S. Vicente, R. Venkatachaam, B. M. Ferreira, P. G. Marques, C. A. F. Marques, E. Pecoraro, L. D. Carlos, P. S. André, and R. A. S. Ferreira, “Thin film optimization design of organic-inorganic hybrids for waveguide high-rejection optical filters,” Phys. Status Solidi RRL 5(8), 280–282 (2011). [CrossRef]  

10. M. Rosenberger, S. Hessler, S. Belle, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, “Compressive and tensile strain sensing using a polymer planar Bragg grating,” Opt. Express 22(5), 5483–5490 (2014). [CrossRef]  

11. G.-L. Roth, C. Esen, and R. Hellmann, “Femtosecond laser direct generation of 3D-microfluidic channels inside bulk PMMA,” Opt. Express 25(15), 18442–18450 (2017). [CrossRef]  

12. R. Osellame, G. Cerullo, and R. Ramponi, Femtosecond Laser Micromachining: Photonic and Microfluidic Devices in Transparent Materials (Springer, 2012).

13. V. Maselli, J. R. Grenier, S. Ho, and P. R. Herman, “Femtosecond laser written optofluidic sensor: Bragg grating waveguide evanescent probing of microfluidic channel,” Opt. Express 17(14), 11719–11729 (2009). [CrossRef]  

14. H. Zhang, S. M. Eaton, and P. R. Herman, “Single-step writing of Bragg grating waveguides in fused silica with an externally modulated femtosecond fiber laser,” Opt. Lett. 32(17), 2559–2561 (2007). [CrossRef]  

15. M. Ams, P. Dekker, S. Gross, and M. J. Withford, “Fabricating waveguide Bragg gratings (WBGs) in bulk materials using ultrashort laser pulses,” Nanophotonics 6(5), 743–763 (2017). [CrossRef]  

16. H. Zhang, S. M. Eaton, J. Li, and P. R. Herman, “Femtosecond laser direct writing of multiwavelength Bragg grating waveguides in glass,” Opt. Lett. 31(23), 3495–3497 (2006). [CrossRef]  

17. S. Antipov, M. Ams, R. J. Williams, E. Magi, M. J. Withford, and A. Fuerbach, “Direct infrared femtosecond laser inscription of chirped fiber Bragg gratings,” Opt. Express 24(1), 30–40 (2016). [CrossRef]  

18. C. Koutsides, E. Davies, K. Kalli, M. Komodromos, T. Allsop, D. J. Webb, and L. Zhang, “Superstructure Fiber Gratings Via Single Step Femtosecond Laser Inscription,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(8), 1229–1236 (2012). [CrossRef]  

19. J. R. Grenier, L. A. Fernandes, J. S. Aitchison, P. V. S. Marques, and P. R. Herman, “Femtosecond laser fabrication of phase-shifted Bragg grating waveguides in fused silica,” Opt. Lett. 37(12), 2289–2291 (2012). [CrossRef]  

20. X. Sun, P. Huang, J. Zhao, L. Wei, N. Zhang, D. Kuang, and X. Zhu, “Characteristic control of long period fiber grating (LPFG) fabricated by infrared femtosecond laser,” Front. Optoelectron. 5(3), 334–340 (2012). [CrossRef]  

21. S. Sowa, W. Watanabe, T. Tamaki, J. Nishii, and K. Itoh, “Symmetric waveguides in poly(methyl methacrylate) fabricated by femtosecond laser pulses,” Opt. Express 14(1), 291–297 (2006). [CrossRef]  

22. W. Watanabe, S. Sowa, T. Tamaki, K. Itoh, and J. Nishii, “Three-dimensional waveguides fabricated in poly (methyl methacrylate) by a femtosecond laser,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45(29), L765–L767 (2006). [CrossRef]  

23. P. J. Scully, A. Baum, D. Liu, and W. Perrie, “Refractive Index Structures in Polymers,” in Femtosecond Laser Micromachining: Photonic and Microfluidic Devices in Transparent Materials, vol. 123 of Topics in Applied PhysicsR. Osellame, G. Cerullo, and R. Ramponi, eds. (Springer, 2014), pp. 315–347.

24. A. Zoubir, C. Lopez, M. Richardson, and K. Richardson, “Femtosecond laser fabrication of tubular waveguides in poly(methyl methacrylate),” Opt. Lett. 29(16), 1840–1842 (2004). [CrossRef]  

25. M. C. Richardson, A. Zoubir, C. Rivero, C. Lopez, L. C. Petit, and K. A. Richardson, “Femtosecond laser microstructuring and refractive index modification applied to laser and photonic devices,” in Micromachining Technology for Micro-Optics and Nano-Optics II, E. G. Johnson and G. P. Nordin, eds. (SPIE, 2004), p. 18.

26. P. Ferreira, R. Stefanutti, F. J. Pavinatto, and C. R. Mendonça, “Femtosecond laser fabrication of waveguides in DR13-doped PMMA,” Opt. Commun. 318, 53–56 (2014). [CrossRef]  

27. W. M. Pätzold, C. Reinhardt, A. Demircan, and U. Morgner, “Cascaded-focus laser writing of low-loss waveguides in polymers,” Opt. Lett. 41(6), 1269–1272 (2016). [CrossRef]  

28. W.-H. Yuan, J.-M. Lv, C. Cheng, X.-T. Hao, and F. Chen, “Waveguides and proportional beam splitters in bulk poly (methyl methacrylate) produced by direct femtosecond-laser inscription,” Opt. Mater. 49, 110–115 (2015). [CrossRef]  

29. M. Rosenberger, M. Girschikofsky, M. Förthner, S. Belle, M. Rommel, L. Frey, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, “TiO2 surface functionalization of COC based planar waveguide Bragg gratings for refractive index sensing,” J. Opt. 20(1), 01LT02 (2018). [CrossRef]  

30. M. Rosenberger, G.-L. Roth, B. Adelmann, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, “Temperature referenced planar Bragg grating strain sensor in FS-laser cut COC specimen,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29(11), 885–888 (2017). [CrossRef]  

31. S. Hessler, M. Rüth, C. Sauvant, H.-D. Lemke, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, “Hemocompatibility of EpoCore/EpoClad photoresists on COC substrate for optofluidic integrated Bragg sensors,” Sens. Actuators, B 239, 916–922 (2017). [CrossRef]  

32. P. S. Nunes, P. D. Ohlsson, O. Ordeig, and J. P. Kutter, “Cyclic olefin polymers: Emerging materials for lab-on-a-chip applications,” Microfluid. Nanofluid. 9(2-3), 145–161 (2010). [CrossRef]  

33. G.-L. Roth, C. Esen, and R. Hellmann, “Circular microchannels inside bulk polymethylmethacrylate generated by femtosecond laser using slit beam shaping,” J. Laser Appl. 31(2), 022603 (2019). [CrossRef]  

34. Y. Zhang, G. Cheng, G. Huo, Y. Wang, W. Zhao, C. Mauclair, R. Stoian, and R. Hui, “The fabrication of circular cross-section waveguide in two dimensions with a dynamical slit,” Laser Phys. 19(12), 2236–2241 (2009). [CrossRef]  

35. G.-L. Roth, S. Rung, C. Esen, and R. Hellmann, “Microchannels inside bulk PMMA generated by femtosecond laser using adaptive beam shaping,” Opt. Express 28(4), 5801–5811 (2020). [CrossRef]  

36. B. Horváth, P. Ormos, and L. Kelemen, “Nearly Aberration-Free Multiphoton Polymerization into Thick Photoresist Layers,” Micromachines 8(7), 219 (2017). [CrossRef]  

37. S. Hessler, M. Rosenberger, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, “Two-dimensional interferometric characterization of laser-induced refractive index profiles in bulk Topas polymer,” Opt. Mater. 75, 230–235 (2018). [CrossRef]  

38. S. Hessler, M. Rosenberger, S. Belle, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, “Influence of chemical polymer composition on integrated waveguide formation induced by excimer laser surface irradiation,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 356, 532–538 (2015). [CrossRef]  

39. D. Choudhury, J. R. Macdonald, and A. K. Kar, “Ultrafast laser inscription: Perspectives on future integrated applications,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8(6), 827–846 (2014). [CrossRef]  

40. F. Chen and V. de Aldana Jr, “Optical waveguides in crystalline dielectric materials produced by femtosecond–laser micromachining,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8(2), 251–275 (2014). [CrossRef]  

41. M. Pospiech, M. Emons, A. Steinmann, G. Palmer, R. Osellame, N. Bellini, G. Cerullo, and U. Morgner, “Double waveguide couplers produced by simultaneous femtosecond writing,” Opt. Express 17(5), 3555–3563 (2009). [CrossRef]  

42. M. Rosenberger, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, “Influence of the UV dosage on planar Bragg gratings in cyclo-olefin copolymer substrates,” Opt. Mater. Express 6(6), 2118–2127 (2016). [CrossRef]  

43. R. Kashyap, Fiber Bragg gratings (Academic, 2009).

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the setup for femtosecond laser inscription of photonic structures inside bulk polymer including a spatial light modulator (SLM) and a 4f telescope with an additional pinhole in front of the focusing objective (a) and schematic illustration of an internal Bragg grating connected to waveguides on both ends (b).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Measured normalized beam profile of the elliptical focal voxel in (a) x-y cross-section at the focal position, (b) y-z cross-section, (c) x-z cross-section using an ellipticity of 15 and an effective NA of 0.24 on the major axis.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Refractive index profile of laser inscribed waveguides at a wavelength 633 nm (a), top view white light transmission microscope image of a waveguide modification 500 µm below the surface (b).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Measured intensity distribution at the output of an internal waveguide at a wavelength of 633 nm (a), femtosecond laser induced refractive index profile measured by Mach-Zehnder interferometry (b) and corresponding simulation of the intensity distribution using RSoft at a wavelength of 633 nm (c).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Transmitted optical power in a wavelength range of 1545 to 1555 nm of a waveguide measured during the cut-back method.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Transmission and reflection spectra of a waveguide coupled optical grating with a period of 1040 nm (a), white light transmission microscope image of a waveguide coupled optical grating fabricated by femtosecond laser direct writing in cyclic olefin copolymers (b).

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

m λ B = 2 n e f f Λ
R = 1 10 T d / 10
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.