Abstract
An erratum is presented to correct an error in the discussion section of [Opt. Express. 16, 7407–7417 (2008)] and to add a relevant reference on earlier work.
©2008 Optical Society of America
On page 4716 of ref. [1], the ω 6 dependence of the hole power transmission mentioned in the discussion should be ω 4. The power transmission depends on the aperture diameter a as a 6 as observed in references [26–28] in our paper. In addition, we have recently learned that a similar correspondence as the one that we observe between the time-derivative of the incident field and the near-field component Ez at the hole edge, was also observed in an earlier THz nearfield experiment by Mitrofanov et al.[2] This experiment measured the in-plane electric field, at a fixed position directly behind a small aperture, using a dipole antenna integrated with the structure, and should have been included as a reference for completeness.
References and links
1. A. J. L. Adam, J. M. Brok, M. A. Seo, K. J. Ahn, D. S. Kim, J. H. Kang, Q. H. Park, M. Nagel, and P. C. M. Planken, “Advanced terahertz electric near-field measurements at sub-wavelength diameter metallic apertures,” Opt. Express 16, 7407–7417 (2008) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. O. Mitrofanov, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K.W West, “Generation of low-frequency components due to phase-amplitude modulation of sub-cycle far-infrared pulses in the near-field diffraction,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1579–1581 (2002) [CrossRef]