Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Linear and nonlinear discrete light propagation in weakly modulated large-area two-dimensional photonic lattice slab in LiNbO3:Fe crystal

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A weakly modulated large-area two-dimensional square photonic lattice slab was fabricated through optical induction technique in a photorefractive photovoltaic LiNbO3:Fe crystal. Bragg-matched diffraction technique was used to characterize the square photonic lattice slab. Interestingly, linear discrete diffraction typical for waveguide arrays was observed in such a square photonic lattice slab, indicating that the lattice slab can be viewed effectively as a one-dimensional waveguide array. Furthermore, discrete soliton was demonstrated in the photonic lattice slab due to a saturable self-defocusing nonlinearity arising from the bulk photorefractive photovoltaic effect of LiNbO3:Fe.

©2009 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Periodical optical systems such as waveguide arrays (or photonic lattices) and photonic crystals have demonstrated many novel phenomena, for example, discrete diffraction [1, 2, 3] and self-collimation [4, 5, 6, 7, 8], for which no counterparts exist in the homogeneous media. This provides new opportunity to manipulate light propagation through structure design. The periodical system becomes more attractive if optical nonlinearity is introduced, and it can support spatially self-localized optical states named as spatial solitons [9] when the nonlinear confinement effect balances the tunnelling effect among the adjacent potential wells. The nonlinear periodical system enables light controlling light and novel potential applications such as optical router, switching and navigator where spatial solitons serve as one of the basic building block [10]. Various kinds of spatial solitons such as discrete/gap solitons [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17], dipole-like solitons [18, 19], multi-band solitons [20, 21], soliton trains [22, 23], surface solitons [24, 25, 26, 27] and vortex solitons [28, 29, 30] were demonstrated in nonlinear periodical system. Analogies between wave optics in a periodically curved optical waveguide and quantum mechanical dynamics of electrons in an atomic potential interacting with an intense electromagnetic field were also studied recently [31]. In this paper, we demonstrated that a weakly modulated two-dimensional (2D) photonic lattice slab (PLS) offers versatile possibility to control light propagation through structure design and optical nonlinearity but with a relatively simple fabrication technology and easy chip-level integration for various optical devices. Linear discrete diffraction and nonlinear formation of discrete spatial solitons were observed in such a large-area 2D PLS exhibiting a saturable self-defocusing nonlinearity. The corresponding beam propagation dynamics in the weakly modulated large-area PLS were also studied numerically.

2. Fabrication and characterization of 2D PLS

The weakly modulated large-area 2D PLS was fabricated by use of optical induction technique. A LiNbO3:Fe crystal with dimensions of 20×1×27 mm3 (X×Y×Z) was used as the virginal material exhibiting saturable self-defocusing nonlinearity due to the photorefractive photovoltaic effect. The crystalline C-axis was set along the X-coordinate direction. An amplitude mask was deposited directly on the surface parallel to the crystalline C-axis (X-Z plane), and the periodical structure on the amplitude mask was fabricated through photo-etching process. For simplicity but without loss of generality, we chose an amplitude mask with a square lattice consisting of tiny pinholes. The places with pinholes were transparent, and the pinhole diameter was 10 µm and the pinhole lattice spacing d was 20 µm. The 2D PLS was fabricated by launching an e-polarized and collimated 532 nm beam onto the X-Z surface of the crystal with the amplitude mask on it, as shown in Fig. 1, in which the experimental setup is depicted. This e-polarized and collimated 532 nm beam was called lattice beam and illuminated the whole X-Z surface of the crystal. A weakly modulated large-area 2D PLS with a backbone structure was generated due to the saturable self-defocusing nonlinearity of the LiNbO3:Fe crystal after an appropriate amount of light exposure. Note that the refractive index at the places with pinholes was reduced and that it was homogeneous along the Y-coordinate.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Experimental setup. S. F., spatial filter; L1 and L2, lens; M, mirror; λ/2, half-wavelength plate; A. T., attenuator; CCD, charge coupled device camera. The inset shows the mask on the X-Z plane of the LiNbO3:Fe crystal, each pinhole has a diameter of 10 µm and the spacing between the two nearest pinholes is 20 µm; C denotes the crystalline C-axis.

Download Full Size | PDF

The structure parameters of the weakly modulated large-area 2D PLS was characterized by means of the Bragg-matched light diffraction technique. In the experiment, a collimated He-Ne laser beam operating at 632.8 nm was launched into the 2D PLS from the X-Y plane side and propagated paraxially along the 27-mm Z-coordinate direction (without the lens L1 in Fig. 1). The intensity of the He-Ne laser beam was attenuated to be of micro-watt level in order not to induce any noticeable optical nonlinearity or erasure effect on the PLS. The light intensity distribution on the output surface of the PLS was monitored by a CCD camera through a lens L2. Light diffraction was observed only at Bragg-matched incident angles obeying the relationship 2d sinθB=kλp, where θB is the Bragg-matched incident angle in air, k is an integer and λp is the wavelength of the He-Ne laser beam in vacuum. Figure 2(a) shows the output intensity profile for the normal incidence. Figures 2(b)–2(e) show the Bragg-matched diffraction which could be assigned to the 2D square lattice with Miller indices (h, k) integers [32]. The refractive index modulation amplitude Δn 0 of the PLS can be estimated by measuring the Bragg-matched diffraction efficiency η10 with Miller indices (1, 0) through a formula Δn0=λpsin1(η10)cosθB/(πd) [32, 33]. For a 2D PLS generated by a lattice beam of 1.38 mW/mm2 and an exposure time of 40 minutes, the refractive index modulation amplitude of the PLS was estimated to be ~10-4. It is evident that 2D PLS with various refractive index modulation amplitude can be fabricated by controlling the lattice beam exposure fluence.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Bragg-matched diffraction of a collimated He-Ne laser beam from the 2D PLS. The red spots in (a)–(e) correspond to output positions of the incident beam and the diffracted beam at the incident angles of 0°, 0.92°, 1.87°, 2.86° and 3.75° in air, respectively. The Bragg-matched diffractions in (b)–(e) are associated with lattice faces with Miller indices (1, 0), (2, 1), (3, 1) and (4, 1), respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. The fine intensity distribution structure (the bottom image) on the X-Y output surface of an optically induced 2D PLS when one launches a collimated He-Ne laser beam onto the 2D PLS along the Z-coordinate, which indicates the effective waveguide array property of the photonic structure. The top image shows the profile of the amplitude mask on the X-Z plane.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Linear and nonlinear discrete light propagation in 2D PLS

It is interest to note that such an optically-induced 2D PLS can also be viewed as an effective one-dimensional (1D) waveguide array. Figure 3 shows the fine structure of intensity distribution of the light spot at the output surface of the 2D PLS when one launches a collimated He-Ne laser beam normal to the X-Y surface of the crystal and propagates along the Z-coordinate direction. Here the 2D PLS was induced by a lattice beam of 1.38 mW/mm2 with an exposure time of 40 minutes. It is seen that the incident light was coupled into and guided along the refractive index backbones of the 2D PLS. This is because the LiNbO3:Fe crystal is of self-defocusing nonlinearity and the refractive index at the pinholes will be reduced under the illumination of the lattice beam, therefore the refractive index is high at the backbones of the PLS, forming effective 1D waveguide array along the Z-coordinate direction.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. The intensity distribution images (left column) and the corresponding intensity distribution profiles (right column) on the output X-Y surface of the 2D PLS at different exposure time t when a probe He-Ne laser beam was coupled into one backbone waveguide. The exposure time of the probe beam was t=0 minutes for (a) and (d), t=200 minutes for (b) and (e), and t=530 minutes for (c) and (f), respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

It is not surprising that, by coupling a He-Ne probe beam into one backbone waveguide of 2D PLS employing an additional lens L1, discrete diffraction typical for a waveguide array can be observed in such a 2D PLS. But more interestingly, we demonstrated that discrete solitons could also be generated in such a 2D PLS when the light tunnelling effect among the adjacent waveguides is balanced by the nonlinear confinement effects. Figure 4 shows the temporal evolution of the light intensity pattern at the output surface of the PLS when a He-Ne probe beam was coupled into one backbone waveguide of the 2D PLS using the lens L1. In the experiment, the intensity ratio between the probe beam and the lattice beam was set to be 560:1. It is seen that linear discrete diffraction is clearly demonstrated in Figs. 4(a) and 4(d) when the nonlinearity is not arose at the very beginning of the probe beam incidence. As the time goes on and the nonlinearity increases, the light begins to contract gradually (see Figs. 4(b) and 4(e) for an exposure time of 200 minutes), and is finally confined mainly in the original waveguide (Figs. 4(c) and 4(f) at time t=530 minutes), indicating the formation of discrete soliton.

Note that the intensity ratio between the probe and the lattice beams was set to be very high as compared to those in literature reported for rigid waveguide arrays [34]. This is because there is relatively large energy leakage between the adjacent backbone waveguides due to the imperfect waveguide structure of the backbone PLS, therefore the nonlinearity necessary to form a discrete soliton should be much stronger than that for a rigid waveguide array even with the same virginal nonlinear material. It is well known that the wave coupling strength between the adjacent waveguides in a rigid waveguide array is mainly determined by the distance between the adjacent waveguides and the refractive index modulation amplitude of the individual waveguide [2]. Interestingly, for a backbone waveguide array in a 2D PLS, besides the distance between the adjacent waveguides and the refractive index modulation amplitude of the waveguides, it is also possible to finely tune the wave coupling strength between the adjacent waveguides by designing the longitudinal periodical distance of the pinholes, providing an additional way to manipulate the wave propagation behavior in such a 2D PLS.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Numerical simulation of the light propagation dynamics in the 2D PLS. Output intensity profiles (top row) and the corresponding beam propagation(bottom row) for different values of the normalized input intensity 0 (a), 0.69 (b) and 1.69 (c), respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

For comparison, we also simulated the beam propagation dynamics within the PLS using beam propagation method (BPM). The refractive index distribution profile Δn(x, z) of our 2D PLS can be approximately described as Δn(x, z)=Δn 0 cos[(x+z)/d]cos[(x-z)/d], where Δn 0 is the refractive index modulation amplitude of the PLS, d=20 µm is the lattice spacing, x and z are the transverse and longitudinal coordinates, respectively. Figure 5 shows the numerical simulations of the light propagation dynamics within the PLS corresponding to the cases shown in Fig. 4. From the results we can see that the light intensity distribution on the output surface (X-Y surface) experiences a transition from the very beginning discrete diffraction pattern to a final discrete soliton state with the increment of the optical nonlinearity. The nonlinear refractive index change induced by the soliton is ~2×10-4. The numerical simulations are in good agreement with the experimental results, indicating that the 2D PLS indeed can be used to control the light propagation dynamics and to support a discrete soliton state. In addition, due to the relatively larger energy leakage between the neighboring effective waveguides in the 2D PLS than that in traditional 2D photonic crystal and waveguide arrays [8], the coupling effect between the neighboring lattice structure is prominently important. More important, it is relatively easy to embed lattice defects in the lattices, to fabricate lattice interfaces among different lattice structure, to integrate functional lattice units on chip level, and finally to achieve fine tuning of the light circuit in such a large-area 2D PLS.

4. Conclusion

We fabricated large-area weakly modulated two-dimensional photonic lattice slabs using the optical induction method in LiNbO3:Fe crystal exhibiting a saturable self-defocusing nonlinearity. We observed experimentally the linear and nonlinear discrete light propagation dynamics in such a photonic lattice slab. The experimental results show that the weakly modulated two-dimensional photonic lattice slab supports the Bragg-matched light diffraction, the discrete light diffraction, and the formation of discrete optical spatial soliton under appropriate conditions. However, higher optical nonlinearity is required to form a discrete soliton due to the stronger energy leakage between the adjacent effective waveguides in the lattice slab. The numerical simulation confirms the experimental observation.

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the NSFC (60678021, 90922030, 10804054), the Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project, Ministry of Education of China (708022), the 973 program (2007CB307002), the CNKBRSF (2006CB921703), the 111 project (B07013), and the RFDP (200800551034).

References and links

1. K. Gallo and G. Assanto, “All-optical diode based on second-harmonic generation in an asymmetric waveguide,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 267–269 ( 1999). [CrossRef]  

2. D. N. Christodoulides, F. Lederer, and Y. Silberberg, “Discretizing light behavior in linear and nonlinear waveguide lattices,” Nature (London) 424, 817–823 ( 2003). [CrossRef]  

3. H. S. Eisenberg, Y. Silberberg, R. Morandotti, and J. S. Aitchison, “Diffraction management,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1863–1866 ( 2000). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. T. Pertsch, T. Zentgraf, U. Peschel, A. Bräuer, and F. Lederer, “Anomalous refraction and diffraction in discrete optical systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093902 ( 2002). [CrossRef]  

5. H. Kosaka, T. Kawashima, A. Tomita, M. Notomi, T. Tamamura, T. Sato, and S. Kawakami, “Self-collimating phenomena in photonic crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1212–1214 ( 1999). [CrossRef]  

6. L. J. Wu, M. Mazilu, and T. F. Krauss, “Beam steering in planar-photonic crystals: from superprism to supercollimator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 21, 561–566 ( 2003). [CrossRef]  

7. D. M. Pustai, S. Y. Shi, C. H. Chen, A. Sharkawy, and D. W. Prather, “Analysis of splitters for self-collimated beams in planar photonic crystals,” Opt. Express 12, 1823–1831 ( 2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. P. T. Rakich, M. S. Dahlem, S. Tandon, M. Ibanescu, M. Soljacic, G. S. Petrich, J. D. Joannopoulos, L. A. Kolodziejski, and E. P. Ippen, “Achieving centimetre-scale supercollimation in a large-area two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Nature (London) 5, 93–96 ( 2006). [CrossRef]  

9. D. N. Christodoulides and R. I. Joseph, “Discrete self-focusing in nonlinear arrays of coupled waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 19, 794–796 ( 1988). [CrossRef]  

10. G. I. Stegeman and C. T. Seaton, “Nonlinear integrated optics,” J. Appl. Phys. 58, R57–R78 ( 1985). [CrossRef]  

11. H. S. Eisenberg, Y. Silberberg, Y. Morandotti, R. Boyd, and J. S. Aitchison, “Discrete spatial optical solitons in waveguide arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3383–3386 ( 1998). [CrossRef]  

12. Y. S. Kivshar, “Self-localization in arrays of defocusing waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 20, 1147–1149 ( 1993). [CrossRef]  

13. J. Feng, “Alternative scheme for studying gap solitons in infinite periodic Kerr media,” Opt. Lett. 20, 1302–1304 ( 1993). [CrossRef]  

14. J. W. Fleischer, T. Carmon, M. Segev, N. K. Efremidis, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of discrete solitons in optically induced real time waveguide arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 023902 ( 2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. J. W. Fleischer, M. Segev, N. K. Efremidis, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of two-dimensional discrete solitons in optically induced nonlinear photonic lattices,” Nature (London) 422, 147–150 ( 2003). [CrossRef]  

16. F. Chen, M. Stepić, Christian, E. Rüter, D. Runde, D. Kip, V. Shandarov, O. Manela, and M. Segev, “Discrete diffraction and spatial gap solitons in photovoltaic LiNbO3 waveguide arrays,” Opt. Express 13, 4314–4324 ( 2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. T. Song, S. Liu, R. Guo, Z. Liu, N. Zhu, and Y. Gao, “Observation of composite gap solitons in optically induced nonlinear lattices in LiNbO3:Fe crystal,” Opt. Express 14, 1924–1932 ( 2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. X. Qi, S. Liu, G. Zhang, R. Guo, Z. Liu, L. Zhou, and Y. Li, “Gap solitons in optically induced two-dimensional square photonic lattices in LiNbO3:Fe crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 131111 ( 2007). [CrossRef]  

19. S. Darmanyan, A. Kobyakov, and F. Lederer, “Stability of strongly localized excitations in discrete media with cubic nonlinearity,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 86, 682–686( 1998). [CrossRef]  

20. D. Neshev, E. Ostrovskaya, Y. Kivshar, and W. Krolikowski, “Spatial solitons in optically induced gratings,” Opt. Lett. 28, 710–712 ( 2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. O. Cohen, T. Schwartz, J. W. Fleischer, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Multiband vector lattice solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 113901 ( 2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. A. A. Sukhorukov and Y. S. Kivshar, “Multigap discrete vector solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 113902 ( 2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. Y. V. Kartashov, V. A. Vysloukh, and L. Torner, “Soliton trains in photonic lattices,” Opt. Express 12, 2831–2837 ( 2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. K. G. Makris, S. Suntsov, D. N. Christodoulides, G. I. Stegeman, and A. Hache, “Discrete surface solitons,” Opt. Lett. 30, 2466–2468 ( 2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. S. Suntsov, K. G. Makris, D. N. Christodoulides, G. I. Stegeman, A. Hache, R. Morandotti, H. Yang, G. Salamo, and M. Sorel, “Observation of discrete surface solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 063901 ( 2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. E. Smirnov, M. Stepic, C. E. Ruter, D. Kip, and V. Shandarov, “Observation of staggered surface solitary waves in one-dimensional waveguide arrays,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2338–2340 ( 2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. C. R. Rosberg, D. N. Neshev, W. Krolikowski, A. Mitchell, R. A. Vicencio, M. I. Molina, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Observation of surface gap solitons in semi-infinite waveguide arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 083901 ( 2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. G. A. Swartzlander Jr. and C. T. Law, “Optical vortex solitons observed in Kerr nonlinear media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2503–2506 ( 1992). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. L. P. Pitaevskii, “Vortex lines in an imperfect Bose gas,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 13, 451–454 ( 1961).

30. M. R. Matthews, B. P. Anderson, P. C. Haljan, D. S. Hall, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, “Vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2498–2501 ( 1999). [CrossRef]  

31. S. Longhi, D. Janner, M. Marano, and P. Laporta, “Quantum-mechanical analogy of beam propagation in waveguides with a bent axis: Dynamic-mode stabilization and radiation-loss suppression,” Phys. Rev. E 67, 036601 ( 2003). [CrossRef]  

32. A. Draude, H. Franke, and R. A. Lessard, “Two-dimensional refractive index patterns with crystalline symmetry,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38, 974–980 ( 2005). [CrossRef]  

33. H. Kogelnik, “Coupled wave theory for thick hologram gratings,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 48, 2909–2947 ( 1969).

34. X. Qi, S. Liu, R. Guo, Y. Lu, Z. Liua, L. Zhou, and Y. Li, “Defect solitons in optically induced one-dimensional photonic lattices in LiNbO3:Fe crystal,” Opt. Commun. 272, 387–390 ( 2007). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Experimental setup. S. F., spatial filter; L1 and L2, lens; M, mirror; λ/2, half-wavelength plate; A. T., attenuator; CCD, charge coupled device camera. The inset shows the mask on the X-Z plane of the LiNbO3:Fe crystal, each pinhole has a diameter of 10 µm and the spacing between the two nearest pinholes is 20 µm; C denotes the crystalline C-axis.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Bragg-matched diffraction of a collimated He-Ne laser beam from the 2D PLS. The red spots in (a)–(e) correspond to output positions of the incident beam and the diffracted beam at the incident angles of 0°, 0.92°, 1.87°, 2.86° and 3.75° in air, respectively. The Bragg-matched diffractions in (b)–(e) are associated with lattice faces with Miller indices (1, 0), (2, 1), (3, 1) and (4, 1), respectively.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The fine intensity distribution structure (the bottom image) on the X-Y output surface of an optically induced 2D PLS when one launches a collimated He-Ne laser beam onto the 2D PLS along the Z-coordinate, which indicates the effective waveguide array property of the photonic structure. The top image shows the profile of the amplitude mask on the X-Z plane.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The intensity distribution images (left column) and the corresponding intensity distribution profiles (right column) on the output X-Y surface of the 2D PLS at different exposure time t when a probe He-Ne laser beam was coupled into one backbone waveguide. The exposure time of the probe beam was t=0 minutes for (a) and (d), t=200 minutes for (b) and (e), and t=530 minutes for (c) and (f), respectively.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Numerical simulation of the light propagation dynamics in the 2D PLS. Output intensity profiles (top row) and the corresponding beam propagation(bottom row) for different values of the normalized input intensity 0 (a), 0.69 (b) and 1.69 (c), respectively.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.