Abstract
A quasi-supercontinuum source in the extreme ultraviolet (XUV) is demonstrated using a table-top femtosecond laser and a tunable optical parametric amplifier (OPA) as a driver for high-harmonic generation (HHG). The harmonic radiation, which is usually a comb of odd multiples of the fundamental frequency, is generated by near-infrared (NIR) laser pulses from the OPA. A quasi-continuous XUV spectrum in the range of 30 to 100 eV is realized by averaging over multiple harmonic comb spectra with slightly different fundamental frequencies and thus different spectral spacing between the individual harmonics. The driving laser wavelength is swept automatically during an averaging time period. With a total photon flux of photons/s in the range of 30 eV to 100 eV and photons/s in the range of 100 eV to 200 eV, the resulting quasi-supercontinuum XUV source is suited for applications such as XUV coherence tomography (XCT) or near-edge absorption fine structure spectroscopy (NEXAFS).
© 2017 Optical Society of America
1. Introduction
Light sources with smooth, continuous spectra covering a large bandwidth are often referred to as supercontinuum sources and have many applications in spectroscopy and imaging. Prominently, visible and near-infrared supercontinuum sources are used in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) [1]. Many applications of supercontinua do not necessarily require temporal coherent light. Therefore, incoherent swept source quasi-supercontinua have been used for example in OCT devices [2]. The extension of OCT to the extreme ultraviolet (XUV), so-called XUV Coherence Tomography (XCT), has proven remarkable potential [3]. For example, silicon-based multilayer systems have recently been investigated with a depth resolution of better than 8 nm [4]. Another XUV application that can take advantage of XUV quasi-supercontinuum sources is near-edge x-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (NEXAFS) [5]. In NEXAFS studies, the absorption of XUV and soft x-ray radiation is measured beyond the absorption edges of materials and is typically used to investigate the electronic structure of solid-state systems. So far, both applications typically require large-scale synchrotron radiation sources [6, 7]. Applications such as XCT or NEXAFS would greatly benefit from laboratory-scale quasi-supercontinuum XUV sources with high flux, since higher availability in comparison to synchrotron sources would provide access to these methods to a much larger community.
Fortunately, high-harmonic generation (HHG) in suitable gas targets [8] driven by state-of-the-art femtosecond laser systems can provide photon fluxes in the XUV, which become competitive to synchrotrons [9, 10]. However, due to the high-harmonic process itself, the resulting XUV spectra are normally strongly modulated with twice the fundamental frequency and thus form combs of harmonic lines with a large spectral range but relatively small bandwidth of the individual harmonics. Consequently, HHG spectra are typically non-continuous, which limit their usability for applications such as NEXAFS or XCT.
One strategy to generate continuous HHG spectra is to temporally gate the generation process to a single emission event resulting in an isolated XUV attosecond radiation burst. Several gating methods such as temporal gating or polarization gating have been developed to confine the emission of the XUV radiation to one laser half-cycle while other half-cycles are unused [11–13]. A review is given in [14], Sansone et al., and in [15], Chini et al.. However, all these methods are technically demanding and reduce the overall-efficiency, which leads to lower XUV photon fluxes.
Here we present a new scheme for generating supercontinuous HHG spectra by temporally averaging over multiple laser pulses with different fundamental frequencies [16]. The setup utilizes an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) to shift the HHG driving wavelength in an easy, fast and reliable way. To this end, the pulses of the Ti:Sapphire laser are down-converted by the OPA into the near-infrared (NIR) up to the mid-infrared (mid-wave IR, MWIR). This has two advantages. Firstly, due to the longer wavelengths of the driving pulses, the ponderomotive potential and thus the high-harmonic cutoff () increases. Accordingly, photon energies readily exceeding 100 eV can be generated in a broad spectral range using the OPA [17]. Secondly, a shift of the driving wavelength leads to a slightly different spacing of the XUV harmonic combs. By time-averaging over several driving wavelengths, a supercontinuous XUV spectrum can be generated which is well suited for XCT in the silicon transmission window and also for NEXAFS studies, for example, at the silicon L-edge [18,19].
2. Frequency combs by high-harmonic generation in gases
High-harmonic generation in gaseous media can be described by a three-step process [20]. In the first step, a strong laser field ionizes the gas atoms. Subsequently, in the second step, electrons are accelerated in the oscillating laser field and thus gain kinetic energy. Certain electron trajectories lead back to the parent ion where the electrons finally can recombine and high-energetic photons are emitted on a sub-femtosecond time-scale [21].
This process is repeated in every half-cycle of the laser pulse with an optical period . Thus, an attosecond pulse train with a spacing of is generated. The spectral representation (i.e. Fourier transform) of this light field is a modulated harmonic comb structure with odd harmonic frequencies,
where is the harmonic order and . In order to evaluate the magnitude of modulation of a harmonic spectrum, the harmonic peaks can be compared to their neighboring valleys. An expression for this is the contrast or the modulation depthFor typical (strongly modulated) HHG spectra the modulation depth is almost . A recorded spectrum is shown in Fig. 1. The driving laser pulse with a central wavelength of 800 nm has a pulse energy of 1.7 mJ and a pulse duration of 35 fs. The modulation depth in this case is and thus, this source is not suited for applications that require continuous spectra.
By changing the driving laser frequency, the harmonic frequencies can be shifted to
When several harmonic combs with different driving frequencies are accumulated, a continuous spectrum can be generated. In order to cover the spectral range between neighboring harmonics, i.e. andthe fundamental needs to be shifted byThis means, the required spectral shift is smaller for higher photon energies. For the silicon transmission window from 30 to 100 eV and a driving laser frequency of 1.3 µm (0.95 eV), the required shift can be calculated as follows.The 31st harmonic (29.6 eV) reaches the neighboring harmonic (33rd at 31.5 eV) at a shift of the driving fundamental wavelength by 80 nm. For the harmonics around 100 eV, a wavelength shift of only 25 nm is required. The mean of many slightly differently spaced harmonic spectra is shown in Fig. 2. For this calculation, a bandwidth (FWHM) of 0.4 eV for an individual harmonic is assumed as suggested by the experimental data of Fig. 1. The blue curve in Fig. 2 shows a modeled single harmonic comb with a large modulation depth of. An almost flat spectrum with a low modulation depth can be obtained by averaging over the generated combs of harmonics with fundamental wavelengths of 1260 nm to 1340 nm using a step size of 10 nm as shown by the red curve. The modulation depth is reduced to . Most importantly, a high spectral power density is realized for each frequency within the continuum. The shape of the residual spectral modulation is similar to a spectral beating due to the different harmonic spacing for the different frequency combs.
3. Experimental setup
We use a femtosecond Ti:Sapphire laser system with a repetition rate of 1 kHz. The laser pulses have a pulse duration of 35 fs and a pulse energy of up to 12 mJ. The central wavelength of this laser system is 800 nm and cannot be changed significantly to perform the wavelength scan. Therefore, the laser pulses from the Ti:Sapphire laser are used to pump an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) [22] whose output wavelength can be remotely tuned. Our setup is shown in Fig. 3. In the OPA, focusing a fraction of the 800 nm pulses into a sapphire plate generates a broad spectrum. The generated white light from 0.5 µm to 4 µm is then amplified in three OPA stages using barium borate (BBO) crystals. Stepper motors enable the adjustment of the phase matching angle by tilting the crystals. At 9.5 W pump energy, we typically achieve 2.5 W at a signal wavelength of 1.3 µm and a pulse duration of approximately 55 fs.
Laser pulses with a varying central wavelength at 1.3 µm are focused with a lens ( cm) into a gas capillary of argon or neon. The usable pulse energy in front of the lens is 1.7 mJ. The peak intensity in the focus is . The backing pressure of the gas is set to 700 mbar and the position of the focus regarding the gas capillary is adjusted to optimize the HHG efficiency.
The harmonic spectra are recorded using an XUV spectrometer that consists of a nickel coated toroidal mirror and a transmission gold grating (1000 lines/mm). The XUV spectrometer has been calibrated regarding the photon flux [23]. A CCD camera is used as a detector (Andor DO940P-BN). Aluminum or zirconium foils are applied to separate the XUV light from the infrared light.
We modified and improved the control interface of the OPA such that the output wavelength can be tuned on a sub-second time-scale without compromising efficiency. In comparison to swept source supercontinua in the visible and NIR/IR regime, where megahertz scanning is demonstrated [2], speed is not a crucial issue for the presented XUV light source, because the required time to record a single measurement in many XUV application is typically in the order of seconds. Therefore, we chose a time step per wavelength of 50 ms, which enables sweeping the wavelength over the full range several times per measurement.
4. Experimental results
Harmonic spectra, each of them with an individual driving wavelength in the range of 1260 nm to 1340 nm, are plotted in Fig. 4. For every individual harmonic line the measured spectral bandwidth (FWHM) is below 1.1 eV. It should be noticed that in our XUV spectrometer stray light from the transmission grating, higher diffraction orders, and a support grid on the grating broaden the spectrometer (instrument) function and thus also decrease the modulation depth. Therefore, the modulation depth of the harmonic combs is strongly underestimated owing to the instrument function of the spectrometer. It varies from in the aluminum transmission window, here in the range below 70 eV (Fig. 4, left), down to using zirconium as a transmission filter for photon energies above 70 eV (Fig. 4, right).
During the non-automated wavelength sweep, the XUV photon numbers remain approximately constant. We obtain a maximum photon flux of photons per at 40 eV. Also the harmonic cut-off keeps constant around 90 eV providing a flux of photons per . The total photon flux (averaged over the wavelength sweep) is around photons/s in the range of 30 eV to 100 eV.
Because slightly different driving wavelengths are used, all harmonic spectra show slightly different modulation frequencies. These differences in the individual XUV spectra can be exploited to generate an XUV quasi-supercontinuum. By averaging the individual spectra as shown in Fig. 5 the modulation depth can be decreased significantly. In this example, the modulation depth is reduced from to . Thus, the smoothness of the XUV spectrum is increased by at least a factor of two. A Fourier analysis of the averaged spectrum (Fig. 5, right) also shows that the modulation depth of the frequency comb is reduced in comparison to a single XUV spectrum.
Quasi-supercontinuous spectra can be obtained in a single acquisition cycle, when the driving wavelength of the OPA is scanned automatically during an exposure time of the XUV spectrometer. With a remote control interface it is possible to drive the optics of the OPA using stepper motors. Thus, single wavelength steps in the wavelength scan can be realized very fast, here on millisecond time-scale. This allows the direct accumulation of many different harmonic combs within an acquisition cycle using the XUV spectrometer. The time-averaging leads to a quasi-supercontinuous smooth XUV spectrum in a single exposure. Theoretically, the time-scale to obtain a quasi-supercontinuum XUV spectrum with ten wavelength steps is around 500 ms. However, relating to XCT and its signal to noise ratio, a chosen averaging time of some seconds is more adequate.
To cover a broad spectral range such as the silicon transmission window from 30 eV to 100 eV, the scan range of 1220 nm to 1320 nm was used for the highest HHG efficiency. The averaged XUV spectrum of the automatic scan is depicted in Fig. 6. The resulting modulation depth is in the aluminum transmission window (Fig. 6, left), which is a reduction by a factor of 7 compared to a single harmonic comb, while the photon number of up to photons per around 40 eV is still comparable to a single harmonic comb. Furthermore, the averaged total photon flux is photons/s in the range of 30 to 100 eV.
For reaching photon energies higher than 100 eV, neon is used for high-harmonic generation. Using a backing pressure of 700 mbar the cut-off energy is increased to eV (Fig. 6, right), which corresponds to the upper limit of the zirconium transmission window. The generated harmonic spectra in this spectral window show a negligible modulation. However, due to the low resolution of the XUV spectrometer (0.25 eV at 80 eV and 1.4 eV at 200 eV) the continuity of the spectrum cannot be evaluated in this range. The photon number in the cut-off region is photons per and the total photon flux is photons/s in the range of 100 to 200 eV.
5. Conclusion
We have demonstrated a quasi-supercontinuous XUV light source with high photon flux (up to photons per in the range of 30 to 200 eV). The total photon flux is photons/s in the range of 30 eV to 100 eV and photons/s in the range of 100 eV to 200 eV. The HHG light source is driven by a table-top femtosecond laser together with a fast tunable OPA. For optimized efficiency, the OPA delivers signal pulses at 1300 nm with 2.5 mJ and 55 fs. The spectral modulations of the individual harmonic combs are strongly reduced by an automated sweep of the driving wavelengths during an acquisition cycle. The resulting XUV spectrum is quasi-continuous and has a remaining modulation depth of in the range of 30 eV to 70 eV, which does not limit the use of the radiation source for the envisaged application.
The simplicity, reliability and the table-top footprint of our quasi-supercontinuum XUV source allows to use it for lab-based microscopy methods like XCT or spectral absorption measurements like NEXAFS. Especially in the XUV, the harmonic source can be an alternative to large-scale synchrotron facilities [24, 25].
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG PA-730/5); Thüringer Aufbaubank (TAB Forschergruppe 2015FGR0094); Helmholtz Institute Jena; German Federal Ministry for Education (BMBF project VIP X-CoherenT); Volkswagen Foundation (501100001663).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Michael Zürch and Christian Spielmann for the help with the construction of the HHG source.
References and links
1. D. Huang, E. A. Swanson, C. P. Lin, J. S. Schuman, W. G. Stinson, W. Chang, M. R. Hee, T. Flotte, K. Gregory, C. A. Puliafito, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Optical Coherence Tomography,” Science 254(5035), 1178–1181 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. K. Sumimura, Y. Genda, T. Ohta, K. Itoh, and N. Nishizawa, “Quasi-supercontinuum generation using 1.06 μm ultrashort-pulse laser system for ultrahigh-resolution optical-coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 35(21), 3631–3633 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. S. Fuchs, A. Blinne, C. Rödel, U. Zastrau, V. Hilbert, M. Wünsche, J. Bierbach, E. Frumker, E. Förster, and G. G. Paulus, “Optical coherence tomography using broad-bandwidth XUV and soft X-ray radiation,” Appl. Phys. B 106(4), 789–795 (2012). [CrossRef]
4. S. Fuchs, C. Rödel, A. Blinne, U. Zastrau, M. Wünsche, V. Hilbert, L. Glaser, J. Viefhaus, E. Frumker, P. Corkum, E. Förster, and G. G. Paulus, “Nanometer resolution optical coherence tomography using broad bandwidth XUV and soft x-ray radiation,” Sci. Rep. 6, 20658 (2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. J. Stöhr, NEXAFS Spectroscopy, Springer Series in Surface Science, Vol. 25 (2013).
6. A. Kuznetsova, I. Popova, J. T. Yates Jr, M. J. Bronikowski, C. B. Huffman, J. Liu, R. E. Smalley, H. H. Hwu, and J. G. Chen, “Oxygen-containing functional groups on single-wall carbon nanotubes: NEXAFS and vibrational spectroscopic studies,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123(43), 10699–10704 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. E. Umbach, J. Taborski, P. Väterlein, H. Dietz, and U. Zimmermann, “NEXAFS investigations on ordered adsorbate layers of large aromatic molecules,” J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 75, 129–147 (1995). [CrossRef]
8. M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, “Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases,” J. Phys. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 21(3), L31–L35 (1988). [CrossRef]
9. J. Rothhardt, M. Krebs, S. Hädrich, S. Demmler, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Absorption-limited and phase-matched high-harmonic generation in the tight focusing regime,” New J. Phys. 16(3), 033022 (2014). [CrossRef]
10. R. Klas, S. Demmler, M. Tschernajew, S. Hädrich, Y. Shamir, A. Tünnermann, J. Rothhardt, and J. Limpert, “Table-top milliwatt-class extreme ultraviolet high-harmonic light source,” Optica 3(11), 1167–1170 (2016). [CrossRef]
11. B. Shan, S. Ghimire, and Z. Chang, “Generation of the attosecond extreme ultraviolet super-continuum by a polarization gating,” J. Mod. Opt. 52(2-3), 277–283 (2005). [CrossRef]
12. G. Sansone, E. Benedetti, F. Calegari, C. Vozzi, L. Avaldi, R. Flammini, L. Poletto, P. Villoresi, C. Altucci, R. Velotta, S. Stagira, S. De Silvestri, and M. Nisoli, “Isolated single-cycle attosecond pulses,” Science 314(5798), 443–446 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. A. L. Cavalieri, E. Goulielmakis, B. Horvath, W. Helmi, M. Schultze, M. Fieß, V. Pervak, L. Veisz, V. S. Yakovlev, M. Uiberacker, A. Apolonski, F. Krausz, and R. Kienberger, “Intense 1.5-cycle near infrared laser waveforms and their use for the generation of ultra-broadband soft-x-ray harmonic continua,” New J. Phys. 9(7), 242 (2007). [CrossRef]
14. G. Sansone, L. Poletto, and M. Nisoli, “High-energy attosecond light sources,” Nat. Photonics 5(11), 655–664 (2011). [CrossRef]
15. M. Chini, K. Zhao, and Z. H. Chang, “The generation, characterization and applications of broadband isolated attosecond pulses,” Nat. Photonics 8(3), 178–186 (2014). [CrossRef]
16. M. Wünsche, S. Fuchs, C. Rödel, and G. G. Paulus, “Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung von Laserlicht mit definierten Spektraleigenschaften,” DE patent 10 2014 018 511 A1 (2014).
17. B. E. Schmidt, A. D. Shiner, M. Giguère, P. Lassonde, C. A. Trallero-Herrero, J. C. Kieffer, P. B. Corkum, D. M. Villeneuve, and F. Légaré, “High harmonic generation with long-wavelength few-cycle laser pulses,” J. Phys. B 45(7), 074008 (2012). [CrossRef]
18. S. L. Johnson, P. A. Heimann, A. M. Lindenberg, H. O. Jeschke, M. E. Garcia, Z. Chang, R. W. Lee, J. J. Rehr, and R. W. Falcone, “Properties of liquid silicon observed by time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(15), 157403 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. I. Waki and Y. Hirai, “The silicon L-edge photoabsorption spectrum of silicon carbide,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1(37), 6755–6762 (1989). [CrossRef]
20. M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, “Theory of High-Harmonic Generation by Low-Frequency Laser Fields,” Phys. Rev. A 49(3), 2117–2132 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. P. B. Corkum and F. Krausz, “Attosecond science,” Nat. Phys. 3(6), 381–387 (2007). [CrossRef]
22. V. V. Yakovlev, B. Kohler, and K. R. Wilson, “Broadly tunable 30-fs pulses produced by optical parametric amplification,” Opt. Lett. 19(23), 2000–2002 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. S. Fuchs, C. Rödel, M. Krebs, S. Hädrich, J. Bierbach, A. E. Paz, S. Kuschel, M. Wünsche, V. Hilbert, U. Zastrau, E. Förster, J. Limpert, and G. G. Paulus, “Sensitivity calibration of an imaging extreme ultraviolet spectrometer-detector system for determining the efficiency of broadband extreme ultraviolet sources,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84(2), 023101 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. R. W. Schoenlein, S. Chattopadhyay, H. H. W. Chong, T. E. Glover, P. A. Heimann, C. V. Shank, A. A. Zholents, and M. S. Zolotorev, “Generation of femtosecond pulses of synchrotron radiation,” Science 287(5461), 2237–2240 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin, “User Facilities – Electron storage ring BESSY II - description and function,” https://www.helmholtz-berlin.de/quellen/bessy/elektronenspeicherring/index_en.html (2016).