Abstract
From the experimental evidence, at least three processes participate in the production of the binocular response to brief changes in photopic luminance. A skeletal model is proposed, which combines three processes to form two binocular channels: (i) The fused channel—the carrier of an early binocular, excitatory process, and (ii) the either-eye channel comprised of monocular ipsilateral excitation and contralateral (reciprocal) inhibition. In a late process, (i) and (ii) together produce the common binocular output. The model accounts for the usual amount of the binocular superiority at the differential luminance threshold: a factor of 1.5. The model also allows for the vagaries of binocular superiority, which can vary from less than a factor of 1 to more than a factor of 2 in different conditions and/or in different observers. In the main experiment, we measured summation at threshold, for two-pulse luminance changes (++, −−, +−, −+) presented with a variable interpulse delay (SOA) to the same eye or to opposite keda1 and Rashbass.2 The results on interocular summation were different, but only at small SOA values. At SOA > 50 ms, thresholds became independent of stimuli polarity and port of entry. Thus, rectification (squaring?) and the final binocular combination must both occur relatively late in visual processing.
© 1985 Optical Society of America
PDF ArticleMore Like This
Alexander I. Cogan, Maureen Clarke, and Andrew Rossi
FH3 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1987
Alexander I. Cogan and Hoover Chan
WG51 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1986
Alexander I. Cogan
MI3 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1986