Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Interocular phase: its effect on binocular summation

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Assuming that the internal response to a brief change of luminance is biphasic,1 it has been proposed2 that responses to binocular stimuli must be interocularly in phase to produce a hypothetical fused effect represented psychophysically as binocular summation (e.g., at threshold). Binocular summation has been demonstrated3 for stimuli that were both spatially and temporally in 0 or 180° phase. These observations are in agreement with the model.2 To test it further, we measured differential luminance thresholds for binocular stimuli of like and opposite polarity as a function of interocular delay (SOA). Pulse duration was a parameter between 5 and 150 ms. With no delay, thresholds were lower for like than for opposite polarity stimuli: the usual finding. The relationship was reversed at a critical delay, near SOA = 50 ms. This effect was at maximum for pulses of 50-ms duration, which suggests that (1) both on and off parts of a pulse contribute to the net response and (2) there is a limit (a temporal window) of phase dependent binocular interaction.

© 1987 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Three over two: a fresh look at binocular summation

Alexander I. Cogan
WF1 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1985

Individual variability in the amount of binocular summation

Alexander I. Cogan and Hoover Chan
WG51 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1986

Toward a general model of binocular Interaction

Alexander I. Cogan
MI3 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1986

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.