Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Test-retest reliability of three methods for measuring contrast sensitivity

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Clinical applications of the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) have dramatically increased over the past decade. The CSF has been recommended for use in diagnosing vision disorders as diverse as glaucoma, age-related maculopathy, and retinitis pigmentosa. The CSF has also been proposed as a test for visual screening, as a technique for assessing visual function in patients with low vision, and even as a means of increasing revenue in clinical practice. Traditional methods for measuring contrast sensitivity require relatively expensive and sophisticated equipment and employ time-consuming psychophysical procedures. Recently, several contrast sensitivity tests have been developed, primarily for clinical use, which are inexpensive, quick, and simple to administer. The value of these new tests depends on the accuracy and reliability with which they measure contrast sensitivity.

© 1987 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Improving the Reliability of the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Test

Mark A. Bullimore, David B Elliot, and Ian L. Bailey
MD12 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1991

Comparative Norms & Screening Characteristics of Three Clinical Tests of Contrast Sensitivity

M.S. Shansky, M. Valella, and C.A. Uniacke
TuA2 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1987

Initial Results of Rapid Clinical Screening Using a New Contrast Sensitivity Vision Test Chart

Arthur P. Ginsburg and David W. Evans
WB6 Noninvasive Assessment of Visual Function (NAVS) 1985

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.