Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Theoretical and experimental comparison of different techniques to characterize surface roughness

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Characterization of surface roughness remains today a crucial problem, in particular in the fields of optics and mechanics. Many techniques [1] have been developed in this aim, and involve scatterometers or profilometers. However the measured roughness values may strongly vary from one technique to another, and it becomes necessary to normalize the statistical parameters that describe surface defects. In this paper we present experimental results obtained from 3 techniques that are Angle-Resolved light Scattering measurements (ARS), mechanical profilometer (Talystep) and Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). Moreover, a theoretical tool is provided for a detailed investigation of the apparatus functions relative to the light scattering and Talystep techniques.

© 1992 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Comparison of Optical Scatterometer and Optical Profilometer Techniques for Microstructure Characterization of Optical Surfaces

R.D. Jacobson, S.R. Wilson, G.A. Al-Jumaily, and J.R. McNeil
TuA15 Optical Interference Coatings (OIC) 1988

Light Scatter from Polysilicon Surfaces and Comparison with Surface Roughness Statistics by AFM*

E. J. Bawolek, James B. Mohr, E. D. Hirleman, and A. Majumdar
PD2 Surface Roughness and Scattering (SURS) 1992

Comparison between laser stylus and contact stylus measurements on rough surfaces

Lars Mattsson and Pia Wågberg
SMB4 Surface Roughness and Scattering (SURS) 1992

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.